Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100

Simply here are some cons and pros.Pros1. Build Quality. Yep! It's Sony.2. High Contrast with Good size for printing.3. Good User Interface4. Customizable buttons5. Portable6. New Battery X takes over 300 shots (Usually I took over 500 shots with full charged)7. Mini usb charge8. Carl Zeiss T coated lens. I don't care about F. my favorite A setting is always F5.6 or 7 (yep. depends on people)9. iso 100 through 800 or even 1600. hard to find noise10. Great Movie recording feature. Mostly better than any dslr or mirrorless ones.11. CompactCons1. No External flash or VF connector (I think it is understandable issue. Because I saw Panasonic's LX7 design yesterday. And Design is so ugly. To me Don't want spend money to get expensive accessaries for compact camera. People doesn't want to spend extra money for that.. I believe. Instead of that, Internal flash is really working great.)2. Grip? (I am a big fan of gr digital or lumix LX series grip but for this camera. Without rubber grip, it makes much sharper and cool design. Yes. I want minimized design from Sony. I believe Leica X series has same issue and they are selling extra grip with very expensive price tag. And original leather case is supporting for this part well)3. No battery charger? Yep. I want battery charger.4. No WiFi? Um.. Actually Heavy photo files can be transferred by usb cable I think. no necessary with 20M pixel camera especially. This is seriously compact for professional or mania. GPS? yep... with gps and price higher is not good solution but same price with GPS feature. that will be great.5. Price... well. little expensive..6. 28mm Wide. 24mm or 25mm is very common spec now a days. First, Yes. I like 24mm Wide lens for landscape but also I like 28mm classic wide lens. In my memory, 28mm, 35mm, and 50mm is my old basic 3 lenses always. 28mm is better than 24mm's distortion and low light at corner issue and feel that is enough. also it is very useful for 5-6people shot at short distance. 35mm lens is classic. it is great for everywhere. portrait or landscape, especially street snap. 50mm is really good for portrait. Most of baby photo is from 50mm. On Automatic mode of RX100, easily change. there is 28mm-35mm-50mm - something like this. If there is 24mm option that will be great but without 24mm it is okay. This is luxury coated lens and classical 28mm.Thank you.

Needed a new DC since the old one is a bit outdated with biggest flaw as image quality not at a par with current DCs. Has to choose between Leica D-Lux 6, Panasonic LX7 (the least expensive one) and this Sony one (due to rave reviews from the internet, TIME and NY Times.)Attractive features:1. Excellent image quality - fine details, little noise in low light (even better than Nikon D300) due to the 1" sensor2. Extremely high pixel count, allowing great details recorded especially at wide angle shot where people on the streets can still be seen reasonably3. Pleasant colors (Zeiss lens does not disappoint)4. Superb focusing (very, very quick)5. Easy to use Fcn button (no manual but once you press a button, there are a few lines explaining what to do; can also get tips from the internet very easily)6. Sweeping panaroma is an eye-opening feature7. Long lasting battery and quick to turn on the camera and start shooting8. Very small size and light weight but quality and build is superb. Also the camera is designed that the weight is well distributed around the thin body, minimizing handshake problem (image stablization highly satisfactory).9. Last but not least, very good looking with right proportions as a small camera should beNeeds to improve1. Macro not as close as I hope to be (remedy: cropping, due to high pixels, the crop stills looks wonderful)2. Starts at 28 mm (not 24 mm). At the far end 100mm, the aperture is a little bit small.3. Sony NEX 5n and 6 still produces photos of less noise. However their size with the lens will be much bigger, if not too heavy4. Price a bit steep (I might have waited a bit before buying this, but the photos are really good so do not want to wait)All in all, no regrets in buying this camera. Can bring it along everyday.

This camera is the perfect compromise between a small point and click and a large, expensive camera. The quality of photos is just stunning. I take it on vacations because it's portable, but I don't feel like it draws so much attention to me that I'm going to get robbed.

I bought this camera after leaving my usual Nikon DSLR with zoom lens and Bogen monopod at the hotel throughout a vacation to Acadia National Park. After that, I realized it was worth exploring what's available in a quality lightweight compact camera, as I also threw away 80% of the photos taken with my cell phone on that trip.I have only fooled with the RX100 a little bit yet, so these are initial impressions. First, it's small, a size that reminds me of a deck of cards or a pack of cigarettes, so yes, it does fit in a shirt pocket (if a little heavy and expensive to actually carry there). It weighs a good deal less than either the bare body or the lens of my DSLR.That small size does have a downside compared to a conventional DSLR - ergonomics. You've got both hands hanging onto a slick metal body smaller than either hand. It has very small fonts and icons, even the icons printed on the case are just a few mm high and hard to really see as they are small and not illuminated. The physical controls are relatively few, and tend to have many functions. The main control you use is a wheel that's also a 4-way rocker switch (both vertical and horizontal) and is less than 1/2 inch in diameter - it's so small that I make a lot of errors manipulating it, getting one motion when I intended another. Of course the ergonomics issues are an inherent compromise with the small form factor, especially because they tried to retain a lot of controls and options. There are a lot of menus to step through.I've taken a dozen or so shots, and have played with the high dynamic range options in difficult lighting. The mode that really works well takes 3 images in 1/3 second and combines them to achieve a well controlled result in both highs and lows. Picture quality has been very good - sharp, with pretty nice colors, and low noise.I am hoping that the ergonomic issues will be mitigated with memorizing the controls and menus as I become more familiar with this camera. I do like the carry-everywhere size and picture quality. Will update this review when I have more experience with this little guy.

Disclaimer: I'm just a regular woman with no special knowledge of camera tech.My husband and I went into an intense debate about which camera we should buy with the upcoming arrival of our first child. We currently old a Canon SD800 that is too slow and a SLR which is too big for us to carry around along with all the baby stuff. He really wanted us to go with the NEX-6 whereas I gravitated more to the RX100. I think essentially, we want different things and we have different goals! Once we established that this camera was primarily for MOM (i.e. me), it was easy to decide why this camera was awesome for ME.- Small and light. I can throw this into a purse no problem. Love it!- One-time purchase. I won't have to buy multiple lenses for different uses. This is one size fits all for 80% of the situations I am in. So even though it is the most expensive compact out there, I actually save more in the long run because I know I won't be blowing more cash on additional lens.- Great for low-light and super fast lens for babies! I don't know the technical specs at all, but this camera meets that criteria when I tested it in the Sony store.- Easy to use and no need to muck around too much with settings. The "intelligent mode" is pretty awesome but I do switch between that and "A" and "P" mode so I can adjust the aperture with the ring to tell the camera what to focus on.- Friends have asked me why not the canon s100? Easy, the sensor size!!! I have no idea what it really means to be honest but I like knowing something about this camera is just as good as the NEX series which should in theory set it in a different class from the other P&S.Cons:- Unfortunately, one of the biggest reasons why I didn't shoot before was that it was a pain to get pictures of our SLR. I really really wished the RX100 came with wifi but I know that would have compromised on size. I did pick up an eye-fi card and it actually does the job quite well. It's so easy to get my pictures on my iphone now! Eye-fi review here: http://www.amazon.com/review/R1JHHYE8AV4DD0/ref=cm_cr_notf_FIRSTHELPFULVOTE_prd

We like pro-compact cameras. It's a great way to take good pictures on the go. We already own an Olympus XZ-1. This would have been a nice camera since it was smaller and faster than XZ-1 while offering a bigger sensor than any P&S.Pros- Image quality- Speed- Size- Customization (Add/remove which settings to change)- Built-in HDR- Built-in flash- Auto-collapsing lens with coverCons- Cost- Durability- Usually harder to find a compatible software for RAW processing (other than the Sony's own software)After 6-7 months of usage this camera died of corrosion. I have never had any electronics that died on me because of this reason. I expected more from Sony. Olympus XZ-1 has been working strong for years even though it has been in tougher weather situations. This camera is not sealed very well. If you are planning to use it in indoors, or in perfect weather conditions with no humidity/wind/dust/rain/snow - than this camera will probably work. Consider shelling out extra $100 to get a full coverage, otherwise repair centers will not even touch it.

I am not a big fun of sony sensor. However, I must admit that this is one of the best compact cameras on the market right now.It performed surprising well during my trip to Cancun indoor or outdoor, day or night.I have multiple professional grade cameras such as Canon 5DII and Nikon D700 and professional lens.This little camera can cover 90% of time when I travel with my family.The only down side is the wide angle is not wide enough. The panorama feature is not that easy to use. You have to move very quickly and it covers less view than my iPhone5 does.

There is plenty of discussion of the merits of this camera, but the image quality goes for naught due the lack of any real auto-bracketing. A cheaper, camera with lower resolution can produce better final images if it has a real auto-bracket function. Sony has been made aware of this glaring flaw repeatedly on their own feedback forums, but refuses to issue a firmware update that could easily fix this.The AEB function only allows + or - .7EV, which is basically nothing. For a 3-image limit, they need at least + or - 2.0EV range.If you plan to take any serious images in lighting that is the least bit challenging, PASS on this camera unless Sony releases a firmware update - which I doubt will happen.

Somehow Sony managed to fit a 1 inch sensor in a smaller body camera than its competitors. This harkens back to the days of the Walkman and Discman being the smallest models of any tape or CD player. And most importantly it takes great photos.I was a fan of the Panasonic LX series for many generations. But the 1 inch sensor of this camera takes amazing pictures in all light conditions. The Panasonic LX might take better bright light pictures and may have superior optics. But this camera take amazing pictures in Jpeg right out of the camera. I don't like the idea of having to convert every picture from RAW just to make your pictures acceptable.I can also take pictures in very low light conditions with alot less noise and blur that the LX series can't handle.Cons:The battery door pops open too often.The grip is poor. Although I highly recommend the leather sticker grips from Japan. Makes the camera easier to grip and gives it a distinctive retro look.Its a little heavier than the LX cameras.If you are looking for great picture quality in a tiny package and shoot mostly auto, this is the best camera you can buy.

My RX 100 is my 2nd Sony camera. My first, a NEX 5 stopped working when travelling in Costa Rica in damp hot humid climate. It was too expencive even to check what was wrong, so I bought a RX 100. It warked fine for a year. Now I am in hot humid Belize and it stopped working! The problem with Sony cameras is that they don't work when you most need them!

I've had this camera since mid-August. I would estimate I have taken several thousand photos with it. I gave it 5 stars when I first started using it. I give it 5 stars today. I've had more fun with this camera, and captured a higher percentage of great shots, than with any camera I've ever owned.I have been an avid photographer for 40 years. I still use professional-grade Nikon film cameras, Canon DSLRs, and Mamiya medium format cameras. I also have a number of higher quality Canon and Panasonic pocket digitals.The Sony RX100 EASILY blows away any pocket camera I've ever used, and in some cases it outperforms even my best 'professional' equipment.It's embarrassing to admit that most of my best photos from the past two months were shot, not with my digital DSLRs, but with my Sony RX100. How come? You've heard "the best camera is the one you have with you." The RX100 is the first camera that's so good and so small that I take it almost everywhere I go. I'm capturing more great images than ever because I finally have a great camera with me almost all the time.Make no mistake, this is a complex camera with a bewildering array of features. While it captures great images on full automatic, it will deliver its best results in the hands of advanced enthusiasts who understand, say, the relationship between aperture and shutter speed. The RX100's advanced capabilities will largely be wasted on duffers who never take their cameras off automatic. But if you are an experienced photographer, believe me: this camera will dazzle you with what it can do.The Sony RX100 is not a replacement for a DSLR in the hands of a professional or advanced amateur. But if you're like me, you may find it's the perfect camera for capturing all those terrific pictures you would have missed because you didn't want to bother taking a 'real' camera with you.

Sony RX100 is an amazing piece of hardware with disappointing software. I own a Canon S90 and the RX100 gives me about a 2 stop advantage and it's only slightly bigger. That's incredible. But I find myself disappointed by the camera software. So much so that I think the $400 Canon S110, with superior software, is much better bang for the buck than the $650 RX100. I find the following RX100 issues unacceptable:- No ability to edit photos or movies in camera. Can't clip movies. Can't crop photos.- Movies and photos are in separate menus and it's tedious to switch between them- Can't set minimum shutter speed except in shutter priority mode. I'd like to use the other modes but the camera often chooses 1/30 exposure which results in blurry pictures if subject is not perfectly still.- No external battery charger included.- Review mode doesn't allow you to select and delete multiple photosComing from the S90, there are a couple features that really stand out though:- Dedicated movie button- Ability to capture full res photos while recording video- Much better battery life

Nothing else to say except it's the best small camera I've ever owned, and i have owned a ton of them over the years. Image quality is incredible.

Seems like a nice camera but not as wide at the wide angle as I would like. It is 28mm. Many cameras today will do 24mm-25mm at wide angle. I have a NEX 5r and really the size difference is not that big of deal. I was hoping to get something smaller than the 5r to tote around but after having, and returning the RX100, I will just stick with the 5r. 5r has same price, tilt screen, 300% larger sensor for better low light photos, and Wi-Fi. RX100 was fine but in the end-for the price- it went back.

The camera takes remarkable photographs. Rich, luscious color and a wonderful film like quality. My major gripe is that the LED display on the back scratches incredibly easy.I bought this camera in July and a few days later took a trip to Europe for a couple of weeks. For most of the trip I kept the camera in my pocket (it is a pocket camera after all!) and took it out to snap photos of our adventures. I took approximately 600 pictures with the camera over a two week period. By the time I returned the LED display was ugly with scratches. In my defense, I did not keep keys, coins or other hard objects in the pocket with the camera. I simply slid it in and out of my pocket and by the time I got back to the States, the display was ugly with scratches. My iPhone 4S by the way was in my other pocket, one where I typically keep coins and other somewhat hard objects. The iPhone's display, now going on one year is nearly perfect. Why can't Sony employ similar technology on a premium product like the RX100? Also, I bought a Canon 5D MK3 in June and that camera, obviously not a pocket camera, gets banged around while hanging over my shoulder against all manner of obstruction. Its display too is without any scratches whatsoever so I know that the technology to build a more durable scratch resistant display exists.Fortunately, the display works perfectly and is usable for reviewing the pictures, but I'm very concerned that the accumulation of scratches after a year or so will render the display opaque!I'm also told that the same type of display is on Sony's new $2800 RX1. If that's the case, then I'll think long and hard before dropping that kind of money on a camera whose display is so easily marred. For that kind of money, I would expect a Sapphire Crystal covered display to mitigate this kind of wear and tear.

I would first like to say that I was a loyal Panasonic, LX3 user for years. I waited out the LX5 and when the LX7 arrived, I made the jump. After 400+ shots I was left disappointed. I really never liked the cost of Sony products, but I had to give the RX100 a try and I must say it really, really is leagues above the Panasonic LX series, and I hate to admit that. I am so impressed to find such a high quality camera that I can cram in my pocket and love the images at the end of the day when I am back on my computer. Well done Sony.Crisp, Vivid images even when shooting in low light/ high speeds!The Con's: Non intuitive menu controls, especially adjusting the ISO in full manual. Maybe this is a personal bias, being used to Canon/ Panasonic. But that is the one thing that prevents the (5) star rating at this time. That, and the fact that it did not come with an external battery charger, but requires the camera to be plugged in.I will recommend this camera to anyone, and what is another $200-$300 more for a camera that will give you thousands of images for many years that you will love!

Met all our expectations based on the research I'd done. Arrived on time and in good condition. Takes good pictures of the baby

I got rid of a Canon S100 to get this camera. The S100 was a great camera but if the price of this one doesn't scare you away then this would be the better one in my opinion. While the S100 took great photos the RX100 takes them better and packs more in features. I really like the panoramic sweep pic mode, the s100 lacked this feature yet sony has been having it for years. You can still stitch photos in the S100 to make panoramic photos but this camera makes it so much easier with one sweeping shot. I was a little disappointed that the panoramic pic mode doesn't work well at night but I was expecting this since the shutter needs to take multiple quick shots in low light within a seconds to create the picture. You can still stitch multiple night pics together instead of using this mode if needed. I thought the extra photo effects would be gimmicky but I found the illustration and hdr painting mode to be really neat effects without the need to edit the photos on my computer. The S100 was limited to a 15 second shutter speed but with the RX100 I am able to go up to 30 seconds! There was one feature the S100 had that I really liked and the RX100 is lacking which is the built in ND filter. I really liked this feature as it helped make it more possible to use slower shutter speeds in conditions with a bit more light. There's a few things I really wish were included for the hefty price-wifi, nd filter, 10x or greater optical zoom. An external battery charger would of been nice as well but since I can use the same mini usb charger for my phone to charge this camera, then that's one less thing I have to carry around with me. IF you're looking for the best bang for the buck for a compact camera that takes great quality photos, get the S100 which costs currently almost half the price of this camera. If you want a pocketable camera that takes the best quality photos out right now then get the RX100

This camera just got back from 3 1/2 weeks, mostly in Turkey, where I took 2100 pictures and 30 videos, which will be culled to a manageable number for sharing. So the camera has been tried in a variety of conditions: low light museums and mosques, sunny beaches, rainy Greek and Roman ruins, closeups of art, and local faces/dress shot at a distance. Plus a variety of short videos shot in similar conditions.In short, the camera is astonishing in the quality of its shots and ease of use. Its greatest strength is shooting at low-light. I seldom used a flash and when I did usually went straight back to using available light to capture warmer colors. In some dark cave ruins in Turkey, the camera captured colors and detail that could literally not be seen with the naked eye - without a flash. Frankly, felt like science-fiction.The videos are crisp and clear. True HDI bought this camera as a supplement to my Canon SLR and the last minute decided just to take the Sony. Never regretted the decision for minute. Its pictures were sharper than my SLR's and I could safely carry it in my front pocket. The wrist strap is a must. It doesn't have a ergonomic grip. Its only other weakness, I would say, is that its telephoto pictures when you get into the long digital zoom range , are noticeably noisy at low light. The 3.5 optical zoom is a little short for such purposes.But all in all, its one fantastic camera which turned out to be worth its high price tag when put to the test.

We've been using this camera for a few months now and decided it's time for a review.Deciding what to rate the camera is the hard part.What do we like? - It's small/reasonably light but has a comparatively larger sensor size. - IQ is excellent for something of this size. - It's a nice looking camera. - Has pretty good low light performance. - Useful when you don't want to lug a bigger DSLR around everywhere. - Superior intelligent auto mode.What's ok? - The camera has plenty of good features but not necessarily that intuitive. - The ring around the lens is not tactile enough but does a job.What's not to like? - The price - being Sony, they will always charge a premium for their products. - It's one of the more complex/harder to use cameras out there if you are trying to go beyond the basic auto mode.We're not pro-photographers so this would be more aimed at people considering a high end compact. If you can afford a little more and portability is a high priority then this would be a great choice. It costs as much as a starter DSLR, can deliver good pictures but is not as cumbersome. Some of the functions and usability of the camera when using more manual settings was not as easy as expected but manageable.Overall, this is a great camera but for a price.

"Pocket" camera? You have to have very big pockets...I've been using a Sony DSC-TX66 for the past 6 months as my daily camera and generally love it, but when I saw the enthusiastic NY Times review for this DSC-RX100, I got very excited and ordered one.The RX100 is a great camera. It is fast and takes great pictures and has every manual setting that a serious photographer could want.But compared to my DSC-TX66, it is huge. My TX66 comfortably fits into my front pants pocket with my wallet. The RX100 does not comfortably fit into any pocket I have, even by itself. This is a big drawback for me.If the photos from the RX100 really were *amazingly* better then any other smallish camera, I might find a way to live with the extra size but I shot both cameras side by side for several days and I really don't think there was a clear winner on image quality. I know that the RX100 has an amazingly huge sensor, but in real life it does not seem to make a noticeable difference in final image quality- at least not for the photos I take. I even took a lot of low light and fast motions shots, but the fact is that the smaller TX66 is also a great low-light performer.One plus is that this RX100 does finally have a standard micro USB port which is nice. The TX66 (like every other Sony I've ever had) uses a proprietary cable, which is just one more cable to have/lug around.Overall, I am sticking to my TX66. If you are looking for lots of manual settings and focus, and don't mind carrying your camera around your neck or in a bag, then maybe the RX100 is for you. If you just want to take great pictures, and want to always have your camera in your pocket then I'd recommend you look at the older and smaller TX66 instead.Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 18.2 MP Exmor R CMOS Digital Camera with 5x Optical Zoom and 3.3-inch OLED (White) (2012 Model)

This is an almost perfect camera. It's truly like a DSLR in a point and shoot body. However, what makes it fall short is the lens. 3.6x zoom is just not quite enough range (5x would fit much better in the point and shoot department). Sure, with a 20MP large sensor, digital zoom is much better. But still, just about every medium-priced point and shoot is over 5x. Also, while the wide-angle f/stop is very nice, at the telephoto end it's really bad. Panasonic is making a 24x zoom that's f/2.8 for the entire range. While that wouldn't be realistic with the sensor size in this camera, I'd think a 5x with f/2.8 over the entire zoom range would make this a killer camera. As it stands now, it's very close to the best point and shoot camera on the market. But, zoom range and lens speed is just not quite up to the task. Make the lens 5x and f/2.8 over the entire zoom range and it really will be a DSLR in a point and shoot body. As it stands, it doesn't really fit as a point and shoot nor a DSLR. So, I ended up getting a different camera. Looking forward to the RX-200 however!

I am a profesional photographer. I currently own a Canon 20D and a Canon 5D Mk II, with a purchase of the Canon 1DX slated for the next few months. I was looking for a small camera that could produce professional-quality images. The Sony RX100 fits that bill!Pros: Excellent image quality. Owned for about a month now. Took over 200 images at a house party in low light conditions. Had a retention rate of > 50%. Ability to shoot RAW invaluable. The digital zoom is fine, but with 20.2 MP you can crop to your heart's content without losing image quality.Cons: Size (it is really small). Need to learn to shoot with one hand, without having a viewfinder to look through and compose the image.Suggestions: Get a quality case to accompany the camera (remember how much you paid for it). Also get a hand strap for convenient carrying and shooting.Recommended for: Professionals/Prosumers who intend to shoot RAW.

This camera takes great pictures. If you are only interested in pictures, this camera is very good. But for this price, the camera shouldn't do anything poorly.The video mode on this camera is faulty. I will try to download a video for review. Loud sounds, such as motorcycles, will cause crazy horizontal lines to appear in the video. I've returned the camera, but I'm stuck will all the cost of protective screens and additional manuals (which should have come with the camera at this price point).I only give two stars because the picture quality was good. I would have given it three stars, but I found the anti-motion feature didn't work as well as my Canon or Nikon point and shoot.