Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
272 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX170 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
27.12.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Фотоаппарат достаточно шорошо и качественно снимает, +прекрасный зум.
- - Отсутствие возможности заряжать...
vov1979
16.11.2014
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Да нет у него достоинств кроме зума в 16
- - больше чем достоинств
аккумулятор держит не плохо. Хорошо при освещении снимает видео даже на зуме четко. Матрица очень шумная ночью...
Скроменый эксперт
11.12.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Очень крутой аппарат, режим "авто" не чё, а вот "лайв" норм, зум просто крутой!!! Надпись "mad in chaina" немного смущает, а так сборка класс!!! Удобно распаложина кнопка приближения. Этот список может продолжаться до бесконечности...
- - Нету!!!
Фотик класс!!!
Скроменый эксперт
21.09.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Любые настройки вручную. Если настроиться, получается хорошо.
- - Автоматический режим слабоват, получается не очень, автофокус тоже подглючивает на большом зуме.
Можно взять, цена приемлема для...
Андрей
03.10.2014
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
ужасная модель
Поставил оценку 1. Причина - отсутствие в комплекте кабеля, соединяющего фотоапапарат с компьютером. Казалось бы - мелочь? Это было бы мелочью, если бы кабель не был экзотикой. Зовётся это чудо Интерфейсный кабель IFC-400PCU. Его вообще в продаже нет. А в интернете он стоит 500 - 1500 (!!!) рублей.
Дмитрий
24.09.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
Данную мыльницу приобрел по просьбе супруги(с моей камерой ей было сложно обращаться)
Интерфейс очень понятный как у всех Canon-ов,качество снимков на твердую четверку (если сравнивать с другимы брендами в этой цене)
Видео также на четверочку. В общем жена довольна-и мне спокойно)
Интерфейс очень понятный как у всех Canon-ов,качество снимков на твердую четверку (если сравнивать с другимы брендами в этой цене)
Видео также на четверочку. В общем жена довольна-и мне спокойно)
Сергей для Андрея
05.10.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
Этот кабель как и у всех Кэнонов - МИНИ-USB! Самый распространенный кабель у фотиков! А фотик хороший, на любителя, и очень недорогой для таких характеристик!
Скроменый эксперт
11.08.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Компактный, неплохие материалы, дешёвый - не жалко
- - Цветопередача оставляет желать лучшего. Без фотошопа...
vzorvan
10.07.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Удобно лежит в руке, качественный материал, отличная сборка (хоть и китайская). Обилие ручных настроек (в т.ч. выдержки и диафрагмы) для бюджетного аппарата...
Александр
01.09.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
Купили фотоаппарат сегодня.Зарядили аккумулятор.Включили и сразу сюрприз-ничего не работает. Камера не снимает.Просто черный экран и всё. Ни в коем случае не берите этот аппарат
Скроменый эксперт
03.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + И правда хорошая модель за свои деньги. Меню удобно, лишних кнопок - нет. Весит мало. Объектив - шикарный, особенно для тех, кто любит играть с увеличением. Видео - HD.
- - Корпус из пластика. Сделан в Китае (что печально, потому что Canon люблю именно за Японскую сборку).
3 года прожил S90, пока "добрая тетенька" из ремонта не сообщила, что Модель эта крайне дорога в ремонте (белый ремонт - 12 тыщь, черный...
Александр
01.09.2014
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
ужасная модель
Купили фотоаппарат сегодня. Включили, а он не работает.
Скроменый эксперт
07.09.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
As some of you know, the Canon SX100 series are my favorite cameras. I always carry the latest model with me in a video-camera-shoulder-bag (i.e. - "purse" for dudes,) everyday, wherever I go. I have owned and used all of them from the SX100 to the SX160. I have long-considered the Canon SX100 line of cameras to be "The Best 2-AA-Battery All-Purpose Travel and Field Cameras Ever Made." I have posted 5-star reviews of both the SX150 and SX160 here on Amazon during the last two years, and I have made it abundantly clear why I feel so strongly favorable of them.Accordingly, I bought a new Canon SX170. I tested it out to compare it. For sentimental reasons, I intend to keep it. But for the most obvious of reasons, which I just indicated in the above statement, I'm not pleased with it. To the contrary, I am deeply saddened about what has now been completely lost to all consumers, worldwide - The day the last full-featured, full-manual-control, compact, 2-AA battery, travel & field camera left on the entire worldwide market - Died.Here is a summary of my comparative conclusions.&&&&&&&&&&&&&SX160 IS vs. the SX170 IS - A CAMERA COMPARISON - THE BOTTOM LINEThe Canon SX160 runs on 2-AA rechargeable batteries.The Canon SX170 runs on a Canon NB-6LH proprietary battery.Other than the battery, the two cameras are virtually identical.I will start with the conclusion first - There is no serious reason even to consider buying the new Canon SX170 instead of the previous model Canon SX160 ... unless you absolutely HATE using 2-AA rechargeable batteries in a camera.Both cameras have exactly the same features, the same functions, and the same specs - except for the batteries. Cosmetically they are virtually identical cameras in almost all respects except for a small change in the shape of the grip on the right side of the SX170 camera. Functionally they both work exactly the same, and they both produce identical quality pictures. No changes were made to either the sensor or to the DIGIC 4 image processor to bring any improvement to the final images produced.The initial Amazon release price of the SX170 is $179. (Sept. 2013)The current Amazon price for the SX160 is $144, about $35 less. (Sept. 2013)Literally, you have to HATE using 2-AA rechargeable batteries in a camera to want to pay $35 more for the same camera with a mini-sized proprietary battery that will only take about half as many shots with each charge, when the quality of the pictures you get will be absolutely identical with both cameras.SPARE BATTERIES. Amazon is currently selling official Canon brand NB-6LH spare batteries for about $38 apiece. (Remember, people, your camera warranty is now VOID if you use a "cheap Hong Kong knockoff" proprietary battery in it. You do so at your own risk.) A spare pair of top-quality Sanyo brand "eneloop" rechargeable AA batteries can be bought on Amazon for about $4, but even "cheap" AA batteries won't void your warranty for the SX160.CAVEAT EMPTOR.That is the bottom line.&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&SX160 & SX170 - BACKGROUND INFO & THE "2-AA" BATTERY CAMERA.The SX170 is the seventh model of the Canon SX100 line of cameras. This series began with the SX100 in the year 2007. From the beginning these cameras have always run on 2-AA rechargeable batteries. That has always been their strongest selling point - the fact that they use 2-AA batteries. If you happened to run out of rechargeable AA batteries, you could always buy spare AA batteries for them to keep taking pictures.That is the main feature which made them ideal travel & field use cameras literally anywhere in the world.The cameras of this SX100 series were all full-featured, with full manual control, and a good megazoom. They were also very affordable. Spare batteries for them could be purchased easily and economically. So these cameras were also inexpensive to use, too. And if you bought a new camera, you just transferred the rechargeable AA batteries to the new camera. You never had to buy any new (and much more expensive) proprietary batteries each time you bought a new camera. So in the long term, the AA battery cameras were always much less expensive for people to own and operate.The new model SX170 no longer uses AA batteries. Instead it uses a mini-sized NB-6LH proprietary battery. These batteries are not readily available except by mail order unless you happen to live near a very large city. If you are traveling, the situation gets much worse. In many places the NB-6LH batteries will not be locally available at all. So the usefulness of the SX170 as a travel & field camera worldwide has been negated. If you are stuck in the middle of nowhere with dead batteries, then you are just stuck with no more pictures!During the last couple of years, these Canon SX100 series cameras were the only full-featured, 2-AA battery, travel & field cameras still left on the world market. The SX160 was the last one. Now the consumer can no longer buy a full-featured 2-AA battery camera at ANY
Скроменый эксперт
29.04.2014
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I don't know why the rave reviews for this camera. I have personally found that this thing is constantly letting me down.Low light pictures: Horrible, grainy, not even worth trying.Daylight pictures: Over saturatedPortraits: Comparable to my smart phone, meaning not worth the price tag on this camera.Resolution: 16MP @ 4:3 Aspect ratio. Meaning few MP at resolutions people actually use.Autofocus: Hope you like playing games trying to get the camera to focus on the correct thing in distances photos. Anything over 25 feet good luck.Screen: Clunky, fuzzy, pixilated, gigantic power hog. Not a fair replacement for a classic viewfinder.Buttons: The buttons are a bit wonky. The "ok" button actually says "func. set" on it. The flash button doesn't do anything on the default settings. I can't figure out how, if possible, to delete multiple pictures at once.Battery: Actually not bad, except that you have to remove it to charge it thereby reseting the date/time and several other settings.Other Features: No WiFi, not the typical mini USB plug, flash needs be manually deployed, confusing menus, limited manual adjustments, basically disappointment all round. This camera is barely a notch above a smart phone, the only thing that is an improvement is the optical zoom, and even that is a bit flaky.To be completely honest, I bought this a quick/cheap replacement for the Nikon S9700 I lost in an airport. That camera took gorgeous photos and was absolutely fluid to use. I know it is almost double the price, but I am returning this Canon and buying another S9700. The S9700 is literally the total opposite of this camera on ever case listed. Supports WiFi, standard mini-usb, plugin the camera to charge, intuitive user interface, solid low light photos, precise and responsive optical zoom, gorgeous LCD, accurate color, auto-popup flash, etc.Bottom line: This camera after 3-days I hate it. Nikon S9700 after 3-days I loved it, but lost it in the damn airport.
Скроменый эксперт
09.01.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I returned this camera after a couple of days use. The images all seemed to have an over-smoothed, anti-aliased quality coming right off the camera. I tried photographing stationary subjects outdoors, the camera hand-held, in bright early day broad daylight, with Image stablization both activated and then turned off.The results weren't blurry or out of focus. Yet I could tell this camera would apparently never achieve tack sharp focus. The deal-breaker for me was that another very cheap camera that I have at hand -- the Fuji JV100 -- produced sharper/better images of the same photo-op. The Powershot SX170 might well be an adequate camera for the arena of low expectations: for production of icons, thumbnails and small images on the net. But keeping it honest, as an upgrade to a low-end $70 Fuji, this camera fails to measure up.This is not even getting into the battery debate. I am strictly commenting on the quality of images it produces.One thing: Where my latest camera before the SX170 has an image default dpi of 72 (with image widths of 55 inches at 12 mp) when I open pics in Photoshop for post-processing, this camera produces images of 180 dpi at smaller dimensions as a starting point. This difference got me to wondering about how much and what kind of interpolation is taking place with my old camera versus this one.Perhaps the interpolating is where things are being bungled by the camera. Or maybe it is the anti-aliasing filter on the image sensor. All I do know for sure is that I am going to be looking at aspects of new cameras carefully (suspiciously?) that I hadn't considered before -- including, now, any image smoothing (so-called) that a camera may include. At general info sites, this specific information is scant; maybe specialist sites will be able to help.Cannot recommend the Powershot SX170. I had very high hopes for it, but the image quality is just too soft. My experience with this camera makes me wonder if the same could be true of all newer generation Canon 16 and 18 MP cameras within a hundred dollar range of this one. Anyone?If you want to know more about digital camera "anti-aliasing filters", look up "Optical Low-Pass Filter". This is definitely a subject for further research, one on which opinion is divided. But the SX170 earns a definite "No" from me.
Скроменый эксперт
10.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have had other Canons (one in the AS series that I literally wore out) and my current cameras - SX130is and T3i. For a long time my husband and I have shared the 130 so I decided to get a second point and shoot so each of us could have one which comes in handy on vacation. Sometimes the T3i is not the perfect camera to grab and take a photo from the car window, but I think this one will be. This SX170is is a upgrade from the SX160is. The 170 uses NB-6L lithium batteries so I am hoping that they will last much longer than the AA batteries we use in the 130. The camera comes in a box with one battery, a charger and a wrist strap. This camera comes in red and black. I ordered the red and it is a deep matte cranberry color. Very pretty. It does not have a viewfinder but it does have a 3" screen. The buttons are all the same as other Canons and very user friendly. The body is slightly smaller and much lighter than the 130. I have small hands and there is a difference in how it feels due to the placemen of the grip on the front, but it is still comfortable enough. I have shot moving vehicles and birds with it in "automatic" mode and they came out super clear and sharp with no hint that the subjects were in motion. I am very please with those test shots. This camera takes a moment to find it's focus in low light but has no problem with full light. The 16X zoom is awesome and a zoom across the length of two football fields comes in very clear. It can become noisy when cropped at those zooms but still useable. While the video is not as superior as the T3i, it works for me and I am very pleased with this purchase. I also ordered two extra batteries and a car charger for it. Now I am ready for vacation and anxious to try it out on our island retreat in a few weeks.
Скроменый эксперт
11.03.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Canon SX170 is a small step above the SX160. Let me use my usual disclaimer, in the interest of fairness, and admit that many cameras by reputable makers (and there are many) deliver what they promise. It is more about what camera traits you are looking for. So, I would suggest to anyone looking to buy one to google 'camera trait search' and get the lay of the land.The SX170 is a fixed lens camera (point and shoot, some would say), with 16 resolution (megapixels), and a big x16 zoom. The sensor size is 1/2.3 inch CCD-type, which is standard for cameras of its class.If you were to, say, take pictures of friends and family at an outdoor gathering, this camera is what you need. If you get ambitious, there will be stumbling blocks. Here is the camera's trait mix: It does not have a viewfinder, which, again, many in its class don't. The ISO rating, which is the gauge for how well it does in low light, is 1600. That rating is lower than many others, but it is sufficient for most purposes. The video is a Full HD- that is 1980x1080 resolution. The camera gives you the option to control manually both the exposure and the focus. It does not have a hot shoe for an external flash option. That is not unexpected for its size and category. The LCD screen is a 230,000 resolution. The camera does not do RAW processing but you would need only if you did not want to be limited by JPEG type storage. The weight of the camera is 251 grams, which is light for its zoom.The main difference between the SX170 and SX160:1. SX170 has a doable burst rate of 2.8; SX160 has 0.5. That is useful for fast action pictures.2. SX170 is lighter due to mechanical improvements.Overall, nice camera. Having been into photography for a while, I do stress though that you do a camera trait search. That will also tell you more about what you want.
Скроменый эксперт
01.01.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
to be fair, I just got this before Christmas and although I have used it, I haven't gotten prints from it yet. I hope that the photo quality is as good as advertised. I thought this camera would be easier to hold one handed (I have a baby and a toddler so I only ever have one extra hand for anything) since I am right handed. It isn't. It isn't bad, just takes some getting used to. The red color is fabulous though. I can always find it even when I can' remember where I set it down and it just looks so new and smart. I was looking for an easy set up, click and shoot kind of camera since I want decent pictures but I don't understand all of the features. This camera is constantly showing me diferent options on the screen and the slightest bump of the dial on the back, yeah, right where your fingers go when holding with one hand, and it changes the settings. What a bother!!! The screen is nice and big and reviewing pictures on it is easy. The flash is terribly bright though so I am going to have to find someone help me adjust the settings for that. It is too dark without the flash in my house during the day but the flash has a tendancy to really wash out the people in the pictures. I know that this is as much operator error as anything. Be aware, the flash doesn't pop up at all when you need it. It in fact has to be manualy raised before use and manually lowered. That was a detail I missed before buying and was a terrible pain when I started using it but I have that down to a habit now and am not bothered a bit. It makes it easier to get good pictures of my seven month old since the flash doesn't snap open and cause her to look shocked in all of her pictures like my old camera did. I simply raise it myself without any noise and it is ready to go.
Скроменый эксперт
01.11.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I was looking for a carry-around camera model that would serve as a good alternative to my husbands clunky, cumbersome (to me) DSLR. Specifically, I need something to have on hand for events for my children's school and generally capturing family moments. I had read a number of reviews.. unfortunately, I had not read this one..."The Canon SX170 is not a fast-action camera, and it never will be. It still has all the same problems of the previous models. It has a noticeable shutter lag, a slower focus, a slow image processor, a slow maximum shooting speed of 0.8 fps (less than one picture per second,) a very slow flash recovery time, it doesn't work very well indoors or in low light, and it does not shoot full 1920x1080 HD video, either, only the older 1280x720 quasi-HD video."~ By John Sturgeon (Monterey, California)http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SX170-Digital-Black/product-reviews/B00EFILR6E/And, in the words of another reviewer, there you have it.It is not good with capturing fast-moving children or shots indoors. It is S_L_O_W, a hand even comes up in between shots asking for you to wait. It does have a proprietary battery, which many are upset about... I'm just impatient to wait for recharging. And, it is constantly _not_ finding the objects that I am interested in shooting (faces of my children), and instead chooses random points in the background - which I found interesting considering I had the subjects faces in the center of my screen. The camera was trying to be too smart, it seemed.I was ready to return within hours of buying it - my husband thought he'd give it a shot... admittedly, he is more of a camera geek than I am. Within minutes or reassembling it from its store-packaging, he came to tell me to bring it back.So, if slow-paced, outdoor picture taking is your thing; I guess this would be great. But, if you were really into that, you'll probably have a high-end DSLR with specialty lenses to suit your subject matter best.
Скроменый эксперт
20.05.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I have had an older model Canon digital camera. The one I've had for a few years is a Canon Power Shot A570IS. Loved that camera except that the batteries would get eaten up by it. Other than that I loved it, the pictures were clear, it was easy to use and learn. I use my camera in my work/hobby and take several pictures weekly and put them up on my website. I decided maybe the newer model with more pixels might be a better choice and give me better pictures. I bought the camera and ended up returning it to be replaced thinking it was just a defect in that one camera. When I use the auto mode, the flash doesn't like to work if there is a least amount of light in the room and my pictures were all coming out dark. My older model did this sometimes, but not nearly as much as the newer one. So I have the replacement, I THINK it MIGHT be better, but not much. I have to put it in portrait mode for the auto flash to work as needed. That seems to help the problem. But honestly, I would have thought they would improve on the newer camera, with today's technology, I was hoping to be blown away by it. It is a decent camera, I have nothing else to compare it to except my older model. The new model is 16 Mega Pixels. The older was 7.1. I really can't tell the difference.
Скроменый эксперт
09.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I am absolutely LOVING this camera. I thought it would be a little larger going by the picture but in all respects, I rather like it. It's a powerful little camera. You can do so much and it's not heavy to carry or cumbersome to pack in your purse. I bought the carrier which was a little extra and I love it. My daughter's graduation is soon and I needed something fast but I didn't want to rush into things so I did a little homework. What I liked about this was the wifi feature. My daughter got everything set up for me which didn't take long but the wifi part she was having a little trouble with although she said if she wasn't rushed, she would probably be able to figure it out. But you know, that's a nice added plus, but since I bought the cord (extra) that hooks to my computer from the camera, it was simple to download them on the computer and make them smaller using my graphics program to put the pictures up on Facebook. My son seems to think there's a setting on there to downsize the pictures and I'm sure there is but I was just so excited to get it, that part didn't even matter to me at the time. I haven't tried the video function but it looks super easy. Overall, this is a terrific camera and I would highly recommend it. Love it! Oh btw the picture quality is EXCELLENT.
Скроменый эксперт
02.01.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
While I don't consider myself an expert on photography, I have spent some time in learning photography and have been making the most our of my old Canon camera.My wife has wanted to learn photography, but going to take pictures with just one camera is annoying, having to take turns.I decided to give this one as a gift this past Xmas and it she just loved it.The camera is small, you can definitively identify it as a compact camera. You can easily hold it with one hand as it is very light.It comes with quite a nice sensor considering the size of the camera. I tested taking some pictures at night and of fireworks and they look pretty amazing.The camera offers all the quirks to learn how to handle more powerful and professional cameras. While you can use the automatic and preconfigured settings that are normal on compact cameras (like portrait pictures, or night pictures), you have access to the Manual (M), Speed (Tv), Aperture (Av) and Program (P) settings which allows you to more properly set the camera to take pictures you want. Mirroring most of its big sisters, this camera has nice controls over white balance and flash intensity, for example.The camera may seem small, and yes, it is pretty limited when compared to other more expensive options, but for someone who wants to learn, or for someone who is looking for a smaller, cheaper side camera, I think this is a perfect option.The only reason I took 1 star out is that I like to have a viewfinder besides a LCD screen. I know for many photographers is a must and it is for me, but this is a small point considering the kind of camera.My wife is very happy and she also loved the color.
Скроменый эксперт
06.12.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was sketical about buying this camera. It should be stated that I am not an owner of a DSLR or Nikon, although I've used those before so I know how some who may own those and buy a camera like this may be disappointed or find it less than great. I don't really think it's fair to rate this compared to those kinds of cameras so I am comparing it to my previous "point and shoot" camera.We had some traveling coming up and wanted a new camera since my current camera looks in really bad quality at night time or dim lighting (like concerts). So I opted for this camera with the Black Friday sale. I've taken multiple shots with this camera and my old one to see what the difference really is and I will say that this camera shoots way better. My old camera in natural light in my home would be dark, this one is naturally very bright. If I took a photo of a carrot peel with my old camera it would just look like some orange thing, whereas with this camera the carrot peel looks way brighter, the image is sharper, you can see the details such as texture or drops of water on the carrot unlike the old camera. I did go outside and try to take photos and while this does shoot better at night than my other camera, there isn't even a night time option so I'm still having that issue of the photo comes out with the bright lights looking hazy, but it's an improvement from the other camera we owned.Overall, if you just need to update your "point and shoot" then I recommend this camera. My old camera only had a 10x zoom and it was 8 MP so this was a really nice upgrade. I take photos of animals, food, and landscapes and have been really pleased with the outcome. If you own a fancy camera, you probably won't be impressed with this camera.
Скроменый эксперт
30.12.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The SX170 is actually the first camera I've ever owned. I was a bit skeptical at first. because I wasn't sure I wanted this to be my first camera, but I knew I wasn't ready for a DSLR. I'm not that into photography or anything, I just want to be able to take nice, clear, crisp images whenever I can and want. After about a week contemplating, I came down to the SX170 and the Nikon L820. A lot of reviews I read deemed the L820 the clear winner, and there were a lot of negative reviews for the SX170 (partially due to the lithium battery). Both of them have super cheap deals going on, but the Nikon L820 was about $70 more, and a bit more advanced, and bigger than I would like my first camera to be. Plus you needed 4 AA batteries to operate it, and I'm a firm believer in Lithium rechargeable batteries. I decided to go with the SX170, and I haven't regretted it since. I got an amazing deal, the camera, plus a free 16 GB for just $99. I am so happy I bought this camera.I'm still playing around with the functions of the camera, and trying to learn everything and get the the most out of this camera. This is an amazing beginner camera. I have so many people asking me if I took the photos on a DSLR! The quality really is that amazing.The only thing I would have to say is that I still haven't gotten a hold of the focus too well, the camera gets very shaky, when its on full zoom on Manual mode (without a tripod) but I think its something that I remedy quickly once I get a hang of it and maybe purchase a tripod. Overall, this is an amazing little camera, with incredible bang for you buck!
Показаны отзывы 25-48 из 272.
