Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX170 IS — 272 отзывов, плюсы и минусы

8.6/10

Отлично

Рейтинг: Отлично 272 отзывов
Средняя цена в магазинах 27 008

Краткие характеристики:

  • 16.60 МП
  • 1/2.3"
  • Zoom: 16х
  • до 0.80 к/с
  • видео до 1280x720
153
69
25
10
15

272 отзывов пользователей о Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Пользовались Canon PowerShot SX170 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

153
69
25
10
15
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

07.09.2013

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

As some of you know, the Canon SX100 series are my favorite cameras. I always carry the latest model with me in a video-camera-shoulder-bag (i.e. - "purse" for dudes,) everyday, wherever I go. I have owned and used all of them from the SX100 to the SX160. I have long-considered the Canon SX100 line of cameras to be "The Best 2-AA-Battery All-Purpose Travel and Field Cameras Ever Made." I have posted 5-star reviews of both the SX150 and SX160 here on Amazon during the last two years, and I have made it abundantly clear why I feel so strongly favorable of them.Accordingly, I bought a new Canon SX170. I tested it out to compare it. For sentimental reasons, I intend to keep it. But for the most obvious of reasons, which I just indicated in the above statement, I'm not pleased with it. To the contrary, I am deeply saddened about what has now been completely lost to all consumers, worldwide - The day the last full-featured, full-manual-control, compact, 2-AA battery, travel & field camera left on the entire worldwide market - Died.Here is a summary of my comparative conclusions.&&&&&&&&&&&&&SX160 IS vs. the SX170 IS - A CAMERA COMPARISON - THE BOTTOM LINEThe Canon SX160 runs on 2-AA rechargeable batteries.The Canon SX170 runs on a Canon NB-6LH proprietary battery.Other than the battery, the two cameras are virtually identical.I will start with the conclusion first - There is no serious reason even to consider buying the new Canon SX170 instead of the previous model Canon SX160 ... unless you absolutely HATE using 2-AA rechargeable batteries in a camera.Both cameras have exactly the same features, the same functions, and the same specs - except for the batteries. Cosmetically they are virtually identical cameras in almost all respects except for a small change in the shape of the grip on the right side of the SX170 camera. Functionally they both work exactly the same, and they both produce identical quality pictures. No changes were made to either the sensor or to the DIGIC 4 image processor to bring any improvement to the final images produced.The initial Amazon release price of the SX170 is $179. (Sept. 2013)The current Amazon price for the SX160 is $144, about $35 less. (Sept. 2013)Literally, you have to HATE using 2-AA rechargeable batteries in a camera to want to pay $35 more for the same camera with a mini-sized proprietary battery that will only take about half as many shots with each charge, when the quality of the pictures you get will be absolutely identical with both cameras.SPARE BATTERIES. Amazon is currently selling official Canon brand NB-6LH spare batteries for about $38 apiece. (Remember, people, your camera warranty is now VOID if you use a "cheap Hong Kong knockoff" proprietary battery in it. You do so at your own risk.) A spare pair of top-quality Sanyo brand "eneloop" rechargeable AA batteries can be bought on Amazon for about $4, but even "cheap" AA batteries won't void your warranty for the SX160.CAVEAT EMPTOR.That is the bottom line.&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&SX160 & SX170 - BACKGROUND INFO & THE "2-AA" BATTERY CAMERA.The SX170 is the seventh model of the Canon SX100 line of cameras. This series began with the SX100 in the year 2007. From the beginning these cameras have always run on 2-AA rechargeable batteries. That has always been their strongest selling point - the fact that they use 2-AA batteries. If you happened to run out of rechargeable AA batteries, you could always buy spare AA batteries for them to keep taking pictures.That is the main feature which made them ideal travel & field use cameras literally anywhere in the world.The cameras of this SX100 series were all full-featured, with full manual control, and a good megazoom. They were also very affordable. Spare batteries for them could be purchased easily and economically. So these cameras were also inexpensive to use, too. And if you bought a new camera, you just transferred the rechargeable AA batteries to the new camera. You never had to buy any new (and much more expensive) proprietary batteries each time you bought a new camera. So in the long term, the AA battery cameras were always much less expensive for people to own and operate.The new model SX170 no longer uses AA batteries. Instead it uses a mini-sized NB-6LH proprietary battery. These batteries are not readily available except by mail order unless you happen to live near a very large city. If you are traveling, the situation gets much worse. In many places the NB-6LH batteries will not be locally available at all. So the usefulness of the SX170 as a travel & field camera worldwide has been negated. If you are stuck in the middle of nowhere with dead batteries, then you are just stuck with no more pictures!During the last couple of years, these Canon SX100 series cameras were the only full-featured, 2-AA battery, travel & field cameras still left on the world market. The SX160 was the last one. Now the consumer can no longer buy a full-featured 2-AA battery camera at ANY
источник
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

09.01.2014

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I returned this camera after a couple of days use. The images all seemed to have an over-smoothed, anti-aliased quality coming right off the camera. I tried photographing stationary subjects outdoors, the camera hand-held, in bright early day broad daylight, with Image stablization both activated and then turned off.The results weren't blurry or out of focus. Yet I could tell this camera would apparently never achieve tack sharp focus. The deal-breaker for me was that another very cheap camera that I have at hand -- the Fuji JV100 -- produced sharper/better images of the same photo-op. The Powershot SX170 might well be an adequate camera for the arena of low expectations: for production of icons, thumbnails and small images on the net. But keeping it honest, as an upgrade to a low-end $70 Fuji, this camera fails to measure up.This is not even getting into the battery debate. I am strictly commenting on the quality of images it produces.One thing: Where my latest camera before the SX170 has an image default dpi of 72 (with image widths of 55 inches at 12 mp) when I open pics in Photoshop for post-processing, this camera produces images of 180 dpi at smaller dimensions as a starting point. This difference got me to wondering about how much and what kind of interpolation is taking place with my old camera versus this one.Perhaps the interpolating is where things are being bungled by the camera. Or maybe it is the anti-aliasing filter on the image sensor. All I do know for sure is that I am going to be looking at aspects of new cameras carefully (suspiciously?) that I hadn't considered before -- including, now, any image smoothing (so-called) that a camera may include. At general info sites, this specific information is scant; maybe specialist sites will be able to help.Cannot recommend the Powershot SX170. I had very high hopes for it, but the image quality is just too soft. My experience with this camera makes me wonder if the same could be true of all newer generation Canon 16 and 18 MP cameras within a hundred dollar range of this one. Anyone?If you want to know more about digital camera "anti-aliasing filters", look up "Optical Low-Pass Filter". This is definitely a subject for further research, one on which opinion is divided. But the SX170 earns a definite "No" from me.
источник
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

01.11.2013

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I was looking for a carry-around camera model that would serve as a good alternative to my husbands clunky, cumbersome (to me) DSLR. Specifically, I need something to have on hand for events for my children's school and generally capturing family moments. I had read a number of reviews.. unfortunately, I had not read this one..."The Canon SX170 is not a fast-action camera, and it never will be. It still has all the same problems of the previous models. It has a noticeable shutter lag, a slower focus, a slow image processor, a slow maximum shooting speed of 0.8 fps (less than one picture per second,) a very slow flash recovery time, it doesn't work very well indoors or in low light, and it does not shoot full 1920x1080 HD video, either, only the older 1280x720 quasi-HD video."~ By John Sturgeon (Monterey, California)http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SX170-Digital-Black/product-reviews/B00EFILR6E/And, in the words of another reviewer, there you have it.It is not good with capturing fast-moving children or shots indoors. It is S_L_O_W, a hand even comes up in between shots asking for you to wait. It does have a proprietary battery, which many are upset about... I'm just impatient to wait for recharging. And, it is constantly _not_ finding the objects that I am interested in shooting (faces of my children), and instead chooses random points in the background - which I found interesting considering I had the subjects faces in the center of my screen. The camera was trying to be too smart, it seemed.I was ready to return within hours of buying it - my husband thought he'd give it a shot... admittedly, he is more of a camera geek than I am. Within minutes or reassembling it from its store-packaging, he came to tell me to bring it back.So, if slow-paced, outdoor picture taking is your thing; I guess this would be great. But, if you were really into that, you'll probably have a high-end DSLR with specialty lenses to suit your subject matter best.
источник
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

08.01.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I purchased this as a gift for my wife, who wanted something better than her cellphone. She is a birdwatcher but not a fanatic, and wanted something with high resolution and good optical zoom while being small, light and simple to use. This seemed to fit the bill. Unfortunately, when it arrived there was a distinct set of flaws in the images produced, with small but visible blotches on the images. We contacted Canon about this, and were extremely impressed with their response. Within a few minutes we were through their voice response system and speaking to a real service person. She clearly knew the camera. After less than 10 minutes with her trying various fixes, she agreed the camera was defective. Canon emailed me a pre-paid return label with full insurance, saying they'd have the camera repaired and back to us in 15 working days. The actual turnaround was 8 days, and this at the height of the Christmas rush. We received a new rather than refurbished device, along with an extra battery and additional strap for our trouble. The new camera works perfectly, with my wife having some gorgeous shots of cardinals at the bird feeder during a snow storm. She is happy with the device, and we're both very happy with Canon service.
источник
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

09.12.2013

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

Not impressed for a couple of reasons. I am comparing this to the SX260 which I bought a few weeks ago. The SX170 feels like plastic while the SX 260 feels much more sturdy. The flash on the SX170 is manual and while I dont care for the placement of the flash on the SX260( under your left fingers as you hold it) I do like the idea that it is auto when you want it to be. I love the grip area on the SX170 for holding the camera steady but the LCD screen is awful on this camera. SO GRAINY....what a shame!! I dont get it. Why would they use a screen that looks this cloudy grainy and unclear?? In comparison to the SX260 which is crystal clear that fact alone made me send this camera back. The 99.00 deal I got was great but honestly the LCD would bother me the entire time so it wasnt worth it. I own mostly canon and Panasonic Lumix cameras and I can depend on the photos being amazing with both brands so it comes down to cosmetic issues for me and the little things like plastic feel and grainy LCD didnt cut it for me on this camera.Forgot to add that it doesnt come with the USB cable either and while I do have a few of those MANY people would not. I find it odd that they wouldn't include something so basic. It has nothing to do with the performance of the camera, just sayin'....
источник
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

02.12.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

The most frustrating part was waiting for the lithium battery to charge, but after that delay, I love this camera. I don't do smartphones and I bought the Canon SX170 IS for its video capabilities. It seems smartphones have almost killed the low end dedicated digital video product category, but the slack has been taken up by what seems (to my armature sensibilities) to be excellent video capture in low-end 'still' cameras. I was not expecting any great low-light video capability when I ordered this camera, but I just took a very acceptable video of my cat lit by a single desk lamp, at night. The white balance adjustment seemed very good too. Previously, earlier in the day, I tested the video with available light from two windows on a cloudy December afternoon . . . handheld. It worked great. I don't normally gush about new gadgets, but I am very happy with this camera. It is just EASY to use. I strongly recommend also buying the Canon USB Cable IFC-400PCU and downloading the Canon software for this camera. This is how I transfer video and images from the camera to my desktop. You will also need an additional memory card.
источник
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

01.06.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Pretty good, for this price, small and compact, good quality of pictures, gas flash light , good for starting photographing
источник
Profile no image

Скромный эксперт

26.02.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

The camera was purchased to replace another that ate batteries. Even with flash, I was able to secure many shots, includind close up details of accident scenes and damaged equipment, witthout any loss of power.
источник
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 272.


Как менялась цена на Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Характеристики Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Камера
Тип камеры : компактная
Конструкция : компактная
Объектив
Оптический Zoom : 16x
Число оптических элементов : 11
Число групп оптических элементов : 9
Асферические линзы : есть
Низкодисперсные линзы : есть
Стабилизатор изображения (фотосъемка) : оптический
Система стабилизатора : подвижный элемент в объективе
Оптический Zoom : 16 x
Минимальное фокусное расстояние : 28 мм
Матрица
Auto ISO : есть
Физический размер матрицы : 1/2.3"
Кроп-фактор : 5.62
Тип матрицы : СCD
Тип матрицы : СCD
Кроп-фактор : 5.62
Число мегапикселей матрицы : 16.6 Мпикс
Число эффективных мегапикселей матрицы : 16.6
Физический размер матрицы : 1/2.3"
Разрешение по X : 4608 пикс.
Разрешение по Y : 3456 пикс.
Функциональные возможности
Подавление эффекта красных глаз : есть
Скорость быстрой съемки : 0.8 кадров/с
Режимы съемки
Таймер : есть
Макросъёмка : есть
Видоискатель и ЖК-экран
Тип видоискателя : отсутствует
Экспозиция
Экспокоррекция : +/- 2 EV с шагом 1/3 ступени
Фокусировка
Подсветка автофокуса : есть
Ручная фокусировка : есть
Тип автофокуса : контрастный
Фокусировка по лицу : есть
Минимальное расстояние съемки : 0.01 м
Тип автофокуса : контрастный
Фокусировка : по лицу, подсветка автофокуса, ручная
Память и интерфейсы
Тип USB : 2.0
Разъемы и интерфейсы : USB, аудио, видео
Версия USB : 2.0
Поддерживаемые карты памяти : SD, SDHC, SDXC
Питание
Тип аккумуляторов : свой собственный
Количество аккумуляторов : есть
Емкость аккумулятора : 300 фотографий
Тип аккумуляторов : свой собственный
Количество аккумуляторов : есть
Емкость аккумулятора (количество фотографий) : 300
Запись видео и звука
Запись видео : есть
Максимальное разрешение записи видеоролика : 1280x720
Запись звука : есть
Запись видео в формате MOV : есть
Использование видеокодека MPEG4 : есть
Время записи видео : 30 минут
Число кадров в секунду при 1280х720 : 100
Поддержка форматов изображения : MOV, MPEG4, формат 16:9, формат 1:1, формат 3:2, формат 4:3
Число уровней JPEG : 2
Максимальное разрешение видеосъемки : 1280x720
Максимальная частота кадров видеоролика : 30 кадров/с
Время записи видео : 30 минут
Число кадров в секунду при 1280х720 : 25/30
Другие функции и особенности
Цифровой Zoom : 4x
Крепление для штатива : есть
Датчик ориентации : есть
Видоискатель
Видоискатель : нет (вывод на экран)
Вспышка
Опции вспышки : встроенная вспышка, подавление эффекта красных глаз
Максимальное расстояние действия вспышки : 3 м
Прочее
Ширина : 108 мм
Высота : 71 мм
Вес камеры (с элементами питания) : 251 г
Дополнительно
Цифровой Zoom : 5.9
Расширенные функции : датчик ориентации
Дополнительные опции : крепление для штатива, таймер
Комплектация : аккумуляторная батарея, зарядное устройство для аккумулятора, кабель питания переменного тока, ремень фотокамеры
Экран
Размер экрана : 3 "
Экран : работа в режиме видоискателя, фиксированный
Число точек LCD : 230000
Съемка
Экспозиция : auto ISO, автоматическая с приоритетом выдержки, автоматическая с приоритетом диафрагмы, общая (Evaluative), ручные настройки выдержки и диафрагмы, точечная, центровзвешенная
Экспокоррекция : +/- 2 EV с шагом 1/3 ступени
Светочувствительность ISO : ISO100
Баланс белого : авто, предустановки, ручная установка
Режимы съемки : запись видео, макросъемка, серийная съемка
Время работы таймера : 2, 10, 1-30
Линейка
Линейка : PowerShot
Режим ISO100 : есть

Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца

Альтернативы с более высокой оценкой

9.9/10 баллов

Nikon D810

198 отзывов

от 235593.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Nikon D7500 Body

85 отзывов

от 177593.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-7M3 Kit

195 отзывов

от 207990.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Nikon D750 Body

598 отзывов

от 92297.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Canon EOS R6 Mark II Kit

72 отзывов

от 272550.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Canon EOS 600D

698 отзывов

от 48198.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Fujifilm X-T30 II Kit XC15-45mm, серебр

101 отзывов

от 141546.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Nikon D3100

1623 отзывов

от 24007.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Canon EOS 1100D

473 отзывов

от 29990.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Canon EOS R8

74 отзывов

от 137789.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 100D

103 отзывов

от 129498.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 7D Mark II Body

208 отзывов

от 86500.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

57 отзывов

от 245828.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-7M4

83 отзывов

от 246486.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Nikon D850

114 отзывов

от 229990.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-6400

202 отзывов

от 114149.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 200D Kit

180 отзывов

от 71609.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 77D Kit

287 отзывов

от 95890.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Nikon D5

1337 отзывов

от 41000.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS RP Kit

123 отзывов

от 147949.00 0