Отзывы о Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
Где купить Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
 | Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 300 черный | Яндекс Маркет | 8 986 ₽ 15 276 ₽ | Посмотреть |
| Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 300 черный | Яндекс Маркет | 10 485 ₽ | Посмотреть |
1163 отзывов пользователей o Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
Пользовались
Canon CanoScan LiDE 300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Фотон-3ZQCM
08.02.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The power supply on my hp5470C finally bit the dust, and this scanner doesn't cost much more than an HP power supply. plus, it's a lot more portable.i read the earlier reviews and was prepared for noise and slow speeds. i was pleasantly surprised.WRT noise, the scanner makes a noticeable mechanical whine when preview scanning at 150DPI. at 300 DPI or more, it's much quieter. i measured the sound output from about a foot away, and it's roughly 56 dB (A weighted). that's not loud.WRT speed, a full page is roughly 15 seconds at 300 DPI color. i tried scanning a dollar bill at 1200 DPI to get a feel for the resolution - the 1200 DPI scan took about a minute and a half, of just the bill.sharpness was excellent. i could zoom in on the engraving on the bill with very nice results. color was good, and sharpness was fine.on text scanning, i tried OCR'ing a page of the instructions that were written in small (about 6pt) type. the included ScanSoft Omnipage software got 100% accuracy.the three buttons on the front of the scanner were easy to configure, and worked very well. a high quality copy of a color photo came out very nicely, when printed directly to my HP inkjet.the form factor is great. it's about as thick as my hand, is roughly 14 3/4" x 10 1/4". weight is very light. it'd travel very easily in a briefcase or backpack, and i would have no compunction using it in a library (from a noise standpoint). it takes power from the USB cable, so would work very well w/ a notebook.overall, i'm extremely pleased with this purchase. it exceeded my expectations.
Интеллектор-1QSUH
29.08.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Fantastic!!! To use this scanner has been thrilling. I have been using 35mm SLR cameras since the 70's and have many slides and negatives. This scanner was purchased to digitize them. The results are excellent. Even though it will scan up to 2400 dpi, 800 dpi makes very pleasing pictures with files that are about 150k in size. Colors are brilliant and snappy. they look better than any other way that I have viewed them. The software that was encluded is easy to use and powerful. It helps to have some photography experience to know what some of the functions are. Sure beats using a darkroom. My favorite part of this software is the scratch removal, cropping features, exposure, and contrast altering. Quick & easy.At 800 dpi each slide or negative scan takes about 45 seconds. This scanner exceeds my expectations!
ТерраБот-3OIFC
06.11.2006
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I had the 8400F at home and was pleased with it, so I bought the 8600F for work when I needed to scan in a bunch of graphics. For this job, I found it to be a really fast scanner. Both the preview and the final scan of the color graphics were speedy. Sorry, but I did not use the scanner to scan negatives, so I cannot comment on that.You can tell more about a company when something goes wrong than when everything goes right. The scanner I received had problems with streaking during the scans. I called Canon and got right through to tech support. They spoke English (meaning, it didn't sound like an overseas call center) and determined after 20 mintues that the scanner was bad. Two days later I received a brand new replacement that worked great. I highly recommend buying the Canon brand based on this experience.I have no regrets buying this scanner, but here are a few things that Canon could do to improve it:1) The USB cable was a tad short (about 4.5 foot). A 6-foot cable would have been better.2) The top of the "scan area" is by the hinge of the lid. That means you have to open the lid wide to put something in. For areas where you are limited in vertical space, it would be better if this were moved to the front of the scanner.3) The scanner cuts off just a hair along the edge of the item being scanned. The edges are how you keep an item "squared" on the scanner, yet 1mm or less along the edge was not included in the scan.The software that comes with the CanoScan is good, especially Adobe Photoshop Elements 4.0, which is always rated well in the PC magazines. The CanoScan driver is flexible with plenty of options for the advanced user, as well as basic options for the not-so-advanced user.I expected a good quality scanner, and was surprised at the speed. I recommend the CanoScan 8600F to you.
Синтрон-9FYHC
01.10.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Very easy to use with a simple user interface that should be good for the average non-tech user. Scans very well all the way up to the reported 1200dpi. You do have to look to find where to adjust the resolution. It is a little slower due to the fact that it has no power supply (which is a very good thing) and gets its power from the USB port which has limited available power. Be sure you have a "powered" USB port. The long-term reliability should be very good because it consumes so little power. I've always loved Canon products and have never been let down. Small, lightweight, cheap, low-power, well engineered, good software, 1200dpi resolution... What else do you want?
Пандорец-7ESAC
19.01.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
USB powered means just one cable. Included software makes scanning a breeze, and lets you change the one touch settings. One touch really works, push a button, and the image is saved to your favorite location. Quality of the scans is very good. Bundled programs are easy to learn and useful.
ИнфраГость-9ZBTK
15.02.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Film scan quality exceeded my expectation considering its scanning mechanism and price. If you want to feel good old way of taking photos, this is a must have! =]
Кронос-0OTIE
18.09.2007
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
With the film scanner attachment door closed and turned upside down you will find 3 pairs of rubber tabs (I am assumming all LiDE 600Fs are the same as mine). These Rubber tabs allow you to hold 3 mounted slides in place while you turn the film scanner attachment over and place it on the scanning bed. From here scan as you would for film. Not the best for someone who has a lot of slides to scan in a hurry, thus I rate the scanner as a 4 instead of a 5Sorry made a mistake. The software is too smart. It looks for the gaps between frames to seperate files, and the mounts muck this up. Clearly the hardware designers and the programs had a laps in communication.
ХроноГость-6GQSK
27.07.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've been using the scanner for over a month now and have NO complaints.The setup was as easy as it gets. Having just one cable to hook up is a real bonus these days, and power consumption is negligible. Instructions were a little sketchy, but adequate. Software is fine, but if you have a photo editor you are used to it allows you to use that instead. I did not install the OCR software as it wasn't important to me, but my son-in-law says it's the best. The quality of the scans were amazing, and the speed was about what I expected. Higher quality takes a minute or so, but in my opinion not that much better that the default setting. Some scans actually improved the original. It suited my space needs better than any other scanner on the market, fits perfectly on top of my horizontally placed Dell compact. I highly recommend this product.
Аргонавт-0NITO
10.08.2007
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Good Only For Scanning Flat Items ~ No Depth Of Field For 3 Dimensional Items & Only Trial Software that you will need to pay extra for upgrades ~ if you want to resize your photos, etc. I am disappointed, as I have always used a scanner for items I list on auctions and this scanner is not really serving my purpose appropriately. I had a Hewlett Packard scanner that worked great for many years, but because I now have a computer with Windows Vista, it would not recognize my scanner because it was more than eight years old. So much for Vista ~ not too happy with that either. Live and learn. Now I see why so many people complain about the new windows vista. UPDATE: Scanner malfunctioned and Canon offered great customer service and a replacement at no charge to me!!!!!
Синтрон-3YOFO
08.02.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The Scanner is easy to use & setup, the resultant scans has been very good. The best thing it works well with Vista & the new Mac intel
ТерраБот-7CUVN
28.10.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I can't tell you how much i love this scanner! I mostly use it to scan old photos ,sketches i make and documents and it is very fast if set to the right settings.I highly recommend this scanner and believe me at first when i ordered it i was very worried if it would work great or not and now I'm so glad i bought it!It also has a nice sleek design,easy to install and use ,and this is the first time i used a scanner so I'm very impressed and happy with it.
Квантум-2NSIS
24.11.2007
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
What would you expect from a scanner under $100.00 Exactly and that's what you get. It's okay for the money thus far I have just made copies of office work and it works quite well but a bit slow conpaired to the last scanner I owned. The software that comes with it is nice and easy to use. over all I would give it a C+.
НаноПилигрим-8RSJW
07.12.2007
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I did not used it very often. The best thing is it is very compact, save a lot of space. Moreover, it only use USB port for power supply. One shortcoming is when you save the scanning pictures as Jpeg, it is a little slow. However, it is much faster to save as PDF files.
Кварковец-2BLXY
26.02.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I wanted a scanner that would work under Linux with an app called VueScan. After reading the list of compatible scanners and a BUNCH of reviews on Amazon and elsewhere, I settled on this scanner. The combination of VueScan and this scanner produces amazing results when scanning color photos. The color rendition is superb and the image quality is outstanding IMHO. Although I am certainly not trying to compare it to high-end scanners, nor have I ever used anything like that, so I guess my opinion is purely subjective. It *does* put an older HP ScanJet 3200C (that I got for free and tried) to shame. It does make a moderate amount of noise when scanning, but it's certainly not objectionable to me. To sum it up: PROS: inexpensive, a *great* bargain uses LEDs as the light source, which should be very reliable great image quality when scanning color photos USB powered small footprint, easily portable works with Vuescan under Linux CONS: none that I have found Things that don't matter to me: Makes some noise OCR not required so no comment Bundled apps not required as I am not using it on a Windows boxOverall, I'd buy this scanner again in a hearbeat. Now it just remains to be seen how long a lifespan it has...
Интеллектор-0XTUG
08.01.2007
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I have had two of these scanners in 14 months. The first one started showing blue streaks after 8 months and Canon did an outstanding job of overnighting a new scanner to me (under warranty = no cost to me). I just packed up the old one and sent it back with a prepaid label, so it didn't cost me a penny! The second scanner lasted 6 months before showing yellow streaks in the scan that couldn't be calibrated out. It is out of warranty and Canon will only give me a 10% discount on a new scanner only if purchased at their online store (so even with the discount and free overnight shipping, the bottom line cost is actually higher than if purchased at Amazon.com).As far as the scanner, I could not be happier with the scanner's ability to scan 35mm slides. Granted, you have to wait awhile, as scanning a batch of 4 slides at the high quality automatic setting at 2400dpi takes about 1 hour. The results are superb and well worth the wait. The automatic settings have trouble with slides with a lot of white (e.g. your slides of Israel) and your scan will end up with details completely washed out, even though the preview looks OK. I spent a few hours playing around with manual settings and now have a "preset" I load up before scanning these types of slides.What can I say - the scanner produces great scans. It just doesn't hold up to moderate usage, so I don't recommend it.
Спектр-0XCSM
23.09.2007
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Easy to install and operate. Takes a full minute to scan each 35mm color negative so the process is quite slow, even though you can put 12 negatives at a time on the scanner. Comes with Adobe Photoshop Essentials 4.0. Software needed to scan and process the pictures is cumbersome. Quality of scanned photos is excellent. Has auto red eye and scratch/dust removal functions. For the price, I'm satisfied. Free shipping from Amazon arrived several days before the "expected" date of delivery.
НоваГость-3PYSP
09.10.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I cannot say enough about this scanner. Just finished scanning almost 2,000 slides dating back to the 1970's and everything came out wonderful! This was definitely the way to go, rather than having a professional business do the same thing for much, much more cost. I saved money, enjoyed digitizing my slides and was completely satisfied. Even the software was/is easy to use. Thank you Canon for an excellent product.
Плазмоид-1NPCP
07.01.2007
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought the CanoScan 8600F primarily to scan negatives and slides - both 35mm and medium format. The first one I bought had to be returned because there was a large speck of something under the glass. I probably wouldn't have noticed it if I was scanning prints, but blowing up 35mm made it too large to ignore. The second 8600 also had a speck under the glass but it's small enough to work around. I recommend that the first thing you do after buying the 8600 is scan a smooth, white, paper at high resolution and check for specks in the center area where film is scanned.I also have an old HP PhotoSmart S-20 film scanner that I've used for several years, but it can't do medium format. So, I thought, if nothing else, I could continue to use the S-20 for 35mm and use the CanoScan 8600F for my medium format material - hopefully, the CanoScan would be good enough to use for everything. I wanted another dedicated film scanner, but one for medium format is way too much money. I did extensive tests and found that the 8600 was very good, but my old S-20 still delivers a slightly better image from 35mm, even though its top resolution is only "2400" dpi. The CanoScan 8600F is very good, and, because it's so easy and fast, I'll probably use it for everything but my most critical 35mm work - and I finally have a scanner for all my medium format material.
Спектр-8QRCE
30.12.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The scanner arrived in timely fashion & pleased my son-in-law when he received it. Thanks for a satisfying shopping experience.
Астероид-7QTAF
15.05.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The CanoScan CS8600F has been great. I've used it a moderate amount, although not extensively. I have scanned in negatives, slides and photos, all with very good results.The only downsides I would mention are that at high resolution it is relatively slow, but I can't imagine any product in this price class being any faster.The support for Mac and PC is great, as I have used it on both, though primarily use it on my Mac. The bundled software is good as well, with Adobe Photoshop Elements a great addition. I actually had Photoshop CS, but find Elements a little better complement to the simple needs I have for most of my scanning and touch ups. Only switched into full CS for one really complicated photo.Overall, a great combination of features, performance and especially price. If there is a better product in the under 250 category, I certainly haven't heard of it.
Синтрон-2GTLW
11.12.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Bought this to use for my small design business. I work from home so the small size was great for me. Easy to understand and works well with my Mac.
ОмниКод-8ZZRO
09.10.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This scanner was strictly bought to scan and archive negatives and slides. Impressive quality and ease of use, and the price is unbeatable. I know there are more pricy ones out there with more features, but for our purposes in archiving my husband's "old school" pro photography it is wonderful. A++++++
Нейрон-2LWKK
22.08.2007
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This was the cheapest scanner with the specs I was looking for in an at home scanner. I use it probably every other day, mostly to at home deposits. I've only used it a couple of times for pictures (some old 1940s pics) and they came out good enough to blow up from the small wallet size pic to a 3"X5". The speed isn't the greatest, takes about 15-20 secs to boot up and about the same amount of time to scan, so probably not ideal for scanning a ton of pics.
Фотон-7RPJU
14.05.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I don't know why others have had problems with the software running on a Mac. I have an Intel Mac, I installed the scanner software and it worked perfectly out of the box. Imported from Photoshop CS3 Import menu and tried it with included software as well and had no problems. GREAT scans too, by the way.As far as the knocks on the scanner software's value as an image editor, I don't know if people are expecting to get a high end image editor or something with a $150 scanner but its been my experience that scanner software usually isnt all that great...same goes for printer software. They are usually adequate and nothing more. There's a reason why Photoshop costs $600.This scanner is great...USB powered (no fat AC plug), 180 degree flip-off cover, and superb image quality. You can't go wrong!
Показаны отзывы 913-936 из 1163.
