Отзывы о Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
1154 отзывов пользователей o Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
Пользовались
Canon CanoScan LiDE 300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
НаноРейдер-0YGOF
15.06.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
For years I had been using an HP flatbed that also scanned slides and negatives (but not very easily). It finally broke which gave me the excuse to purchase a new one. I had intended to purchase an Epson, but after reading the reviews decided to get the Canon 8600. I am so glad I did!!! The best feature to me is being able to scan multiple photos, slides, or negatives. I have many of each and the ability to scan more than one at a time is great.For multiple photos, you just have to leave a bit of space (3 cm is recommended) between each photos and the edge of the glass. I aquired the images directly into Photoshop bypassing Canon's image editing program. AND, each photo came in as a separate file - no cropping needed! It took a few scans to get the photo orientation and order of scanning figured out, but it was painless.Slides were also a breeze. You have to remove a cover (easy) and place the slides in a provided attachment. Place the attachment in the slot and connect a cable from the lid to the body of the scanner and you are ready. I did use the Canon image editing with the slides and found it to be better than what I would normally expect to be bundled with a scanner. With the multiple image scan selected, the software automatically separates each slides into a separate file as it did with the photos.Negatives were a bit trickier. The negative attachment tray has room to insert two 35mm filmstrips of 6 negatives each. If you do not fill up all the entire slot, you have to put a piece of black paper over the remaining slot. My only complaint is that I wish Canon had provided a contraption. Since it did not, I had to find some black construction paper and cut two strips to fit in the slots. Not hard, but a hassle. So if you are going to do negatives, have the black paper ready when the scanner arrives. Again, each negative is scanned seperately so naming each file is a snap. The sctual scan can take a couple minutes if you have several negatives, but time is not a issue with me. There is also a 120 film attachment, but I have not/will not be using it.I am still in awe of how easy this scanner is. The quality is remarkable! I am scanning some slides and negatives that are over 25 years old. In most cases, using the auto adjustment corrects the color and exposure. I would recommend this scanner to beginners and pros alike.
МехаРейнджер-6LBJX
29.02.2008
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Ok, so you're shopping for a scanner and you're considering the Canon Canoscan Lide25. Great!Ask yourself the following questions:1. Are you interested in very good quality?2. Are you going to scan VERY INFREQUENTLY?If you answered both questions in the affirmative then please consider this a 5 star review. The Lide-25's quality easily rivals anything you're likely to ever want to spend consumer money on.On the other hand, and I can't belive this hasn't been stressed in all the other reviews, this scanner is so PAINFULLY SLOW that use beyond occasional use would probably be maddening for most individuals.For isntance in my case I was in the market to replace my previous scanner (a Canon Canoscan D1250U for what it's worth) which gave up the ghost. I use my scanner to scan in health insurance paperwork, credit card statements, letters, receipts and warranty info for products under warranty etc.THERE IS NO WAY IN HECK that I could live with this scanner for my purpose.Just to give you an idea... I tested the Canoscan Lide-25 and Lide-90 head-to-head ... scanning two pages in Grayscale 300dpi one after the other took 49 seconds with the Lide-90 and 101 seconds with the Lide-25 ... more than twice as long.Again, if frequent scanning isn't your thing I would easily recommend this scanner as you'll probably be very satisfied with the results given the price level.
ХроноГость-6ERSL
24.04.2007
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I get so sick of interface programs that are forced down my throat. Windows XP already has the Scanner Wizard feature, which should be able to detect and control any scanner I plug in to my computer. But, the wizard doesn't detect it. So, the only way to use it is with Canon's interface program.The interface is a reasonable program, but so what? I always prefer the XP wizard over the interface programs coming with scanners, because scanner interfaces always have two negatives: they're unnecessarily complicated and they're much slower controlling a scanner than the XP wizard.The reason I bought a scanner has nothing to do with their interface obviously. I should be able to use XP alone, for faster results. This is not the fault of XP or my computer; it's the fault of the scanner for being weird. All I asked for is a scanner that would read what I put on it. I can fix my pictures myself. Why make things more complicated when I already know what I want?Additionally, the Canon people know that users like friendly products. I mean, if there is a locking mechanism under the scanner, how am I suppose to know that this is the reason my scanner isn't working? It makes me feel like an idiot for not knowing things about computer stuff. I almost sent the thing back to Amazon. Why didn't their instructions file mention it? I've used several brands of scanners at work, but other people had unboxed them.Then, why can't my computer locate the necessary files online on its own? I get a dialogue box stating the files can't be found online. I have to find the specific website to download the files. The problem arising from this is public computers, like the ones at my college or at my job, usually don't allow people to install programs. It's a security thing preventing tampering.Do I care about the whirring noise when I go to scan something? Not really. I just want the darn thing to operate the way I tell it, and without the pageant of programs on the CD I'm forced into using.There's a lot of talk about how good this scanner is for the fact that it takes its power through the USB. Well, that's great for laptops, I guess. But, it's obviously irrelevant for desktop computers.The only thing I favor about this scanner is the small amount of storage space it uses: it fits neatly into a small drawer. It'd be perfect for travelers with laptop luggage, those who don't mind using the programs coming with it.
Плазмоид-5CIIC
25.10.2008
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
This scanner is extremely thin and lightweight. It runs completely off the power from the USB cable, no power cable. Quality from the scans is very high. The only thing that bothers me is the software - it must be running in order for the quick buttons on the scanner to scan, and then when you want to save the photos you have to close the software before it prompts you to save. There's no File/Save option that is obvious. I feel that this is an excellent choice for such a low cost, and it has definitely met my needs.
Туманник-4UFGR
22.11.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is a great all purpose scanner. Power supply through USB - so no additional cabling etc.Great image quality. I have been using it since 2005 - flawless.Quite compact - so one can carry it in a briefcase, if necessary.And - works with a Mac quite seamlessly.Even works with SANE (linux, unix).Only thing that I miss is the ADF. But of course, that will significantly reduce the portability of the scanner.
Кронос-0JSFV
18.02.2008
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
So, it is fair to give one star to a scanner only costing $50? In this case, I think the answer is yes. Why?If you just occasionally scan in a single sheet of paper, you may get away with this scanner. The web is filled with complaints of people who can't even do that -- google this scanner and "twain error" -- but I've had no trouble with single pages yet.The problems really start occurring if you try to scan in any multi-page document. The scanner is incredibly slow, which goes along with the price, but it randomly crashes in the middle of scans with a "twain error." Even more egregiously, everything you've scanned in so far is lost in the process. So, it's back to square one, where it's just as likely to crash mid-process again. It can literally take an hour to successfully scan in a 10 page gray-scale paper, as it keeps crashing in the middle. Just awful.If you have any intention of scanning in documents, this is simply not the scanner to buy. You'll save money upfront, but you'll just end up having to return it and getting a better (non-Canon) scanner as a replacement. And Canon is of zero help in figuring out what's wrong; it is presumably a problem with their drivers that they cannot fix.My advice is avoid this at all costs unless you are the most casual of scanner users. If it doesn't work, it's not a bargain.
Супернова-1RRZX
18.12.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I got this scanner because of the price. When I got it, I loved because of:1. The scans look so good.2. The scanner is usb powered, you can attach it to a netbook and then you will get a scanner camera (only add the lenses).Amazing value for the price. I love it.
Гиперион-4SDDL
02.11.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I had bought a CanoScan 650U about 5 years ago and is still going strong and i was so impressed I went for another Cano Scan for my Company. it is slim and can be adjusted for thick books and it has only one USB cord for both scan and Power.this LiDE 25 has three small buttons in the front for quick scan-copy-email option which is very handy. if I was you I would go for another one
Квантум-6OUUO
24.10.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I was worried about where I was going to fit the scanner on my crowded desk, but I discovered that is was small enough to easily fit in my file cabinet in a hanging folder. It takes about 1 minute to initialize when I plug it in each time, but after I'm done, I just lock the scanning mechanism in place and file it away until it is needed again. Great quality for a very reasonable price.
Пульсар-5NTSI
12.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Scanner works as it should right out of the box. Both Mac and PC. No power cable needed as it runs right off the power from your USB. Lightweight, portable and thin. Would definitely buy this product again.
Астрономад-2IKPQ
28.10.2007
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I purchased this unit to digitize ~1000 photographs that have been taken over the last 20+ years. I'm also using the scanner to obtain text from my student textbooks.This is a small, lightweight scanner. You probably don't want to let your young children operate this somewhat lightweight unit. It's size means you can easily store it near your work area and grab for quick scans.If your computer is running windows Vista you'll want to obtain updates for the Arcsoft photostudio and OmniPage SE programs that come on the CD. Canon does have a web page discussing Vista & software updates. Speaking of the CD; after installing the applications make sure to run them before storing the CD! At least one of the installations is an 'installer' install, which asks for the CD to install the program(?)Pluses-- OCR software works pretty well. This is my first time using OCR software. Picks up and lays out text content nicely, clearly flagging uncertain portions of the scan for manual correction.- small size- USB power only; no extra cord to carry- The price is right :)- multi-scan automatically creates separate scanned images of multiple items, a big time saverMinuses-- It's a bit noisy, you won't want to use it in a library- software is not visa-ready, remedied by visiting canonusa.comIt's a good unit, though you'll probably want to schedule 2 hours to set it up and 'play with' the software. Software works well but has some difficulty installing under Vista.This is a decent 'first' scanner. As light and small as it is you may find yourself 'going digital', digitizing all your paperwork, photographs, etc.
НаноПилигрим-3XVDP
28.08.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This scanner is exactly what you get when you pay $50 for a scanner. It's great for a few copies in a sitting, but not made for large quantities of scans. If thats what you need, then look at more expensive models. I bought this scanner for the sole purpose as an addition to my home PC to scan articles or the odd business document. The quality is good and you can barely tell the difference between the original and copy on 300dpi. The machine is loud and slow, but it gets the small jobs done. Well worth the $50 I spent on it.
Гиперион-1WPOJ
12.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I ordered this scanner to work with my new Mac. It was easy to connect...the software was user friendly. It is so compact and light I just love it!!! Great deal
Кварковец-7ZLFJ
26.07.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought it to scan negatives.It is a bit slow when it does this, I guess it's to be expected.Performs wonderfully on normal scans.Only reason I gave it 4 instead of 5 is the drivers load in memory every time operating system boots.There's no need for TSR drivers; make a device driver that can be read from a file.The drivers for this are just memory hogs - there's no need for them to be running as programs all the time.If you are looking for a good scanner and don't know what any of that means; buy this scanner. It's a good one.If you DO know what that means, complain to Canon.It's just laziness that they wrote the drivers that way.
Кронос-6HQCB
07.12.2007
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
*edit*I have now been using this scanner for the past several years, and it is amazing. I previously wrote about Canon's terrific customer service, and the product itself is easy-to-use and reliable as long as you maintain it properly. I use it to scan my artwork into the computer, and I'd definitely recommend it to anyone looking for an affordable quality scanner.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------I was very excited to have purchased this scanner--it has been on my wishlist for many years now and I could finally afford it out of my own pocketbook ^_^ However, it turns out that this scanner is defective. I thought I was being technologically incompetent--I continued receiving the same error messages--but the Canon rep I spoke with today said it is a hardware problem and not a software or computer problem. And they are issuing me a new one under warranty (So I don't have to pay a cent). Right now it is Friday, and he said to expect it sometime around Monday. Warranty or not, the Canon customer service was AMAZING, and to be honest, I am not angry at all, albeit a bit disappointed that I couldn't use my scanner sooner. After all, sometimes these things do happen, right? So I plan to come home early as I can on Monday and try out my new scanner. And then I'll finally be able to write a review on its performance! So take this 2-star review lightly until then...
НеоВояжер-8EQYX
11.09.2008
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I purchased the model several years ago. I'd been quite happy with it, it worked on my PCs or my Macintoshs. The problem now is Canon has not kept up with the drivers on the Macintosh and since I don't use PCs anymore this unit is dead weight. Searching the Internet for alternate drivers shows me many other people have the same issue with driver software and there seems to be no alternatives. It is not USB 2.0 compatible BTW. It was not designed to be.
Альфа-Юнит-8UWAI
15.05.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I was looking for a scanner to scan two huge boxes of old familyphotos. cant beat the price. its small but great for scanningprints. I like the no power-block to keep down on the clutter. andI must rave about the auto-crop feature... its exactly what I needed.if I scan, say, 4 old photos at once it detects the seperate imagesand auto-crops them into their own files. a huge time saver so nowI dont have to do the cropping by hand in photoshop.BUT I returned the lide25 for the lide90 cuz it just wasnt fast enuff.its usb 1.1. a 600 dpi scan took 120 seconds which just isnt going towork for a huge box of photos. a 300 dpi scan is 60 seconds but stillnot faster enuff. I also couldnt find a way to select any dpi between300 and 600 if I wanted to do auto-crop so 600 it is. I wish it wouldallow me to pick 400 dpi.great scanner if you dont care about the speed.
Кронос-1YVRH
24.11.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Good scanner. I just needed better quality images for website; better than just digital photos. I have to work on them in photoshop, but if you have photoshop it's a good scanner for the money.
Гравитон-7SRPJ
01.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This scanner is great I dont know why people gave it bad reviews?... The Scan took long time but it gave what I want ^^ took longer then 10 days to reach my house ^^
Пандорец-6DVOJ
20.09.2007
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I purchased this scanner from Amazon after reading all the reviews on Amazon- both negative and positive. I mainly purchased this scanner to scan & archive old 35mm slides as well as store important documents on my computer. I'm very happy with this scanner.Installation went very smoothly (I'm using Windows XP w/1GB RAM). It's easy to use, produces high quality scans, and scans my 35mm slides quickly.The product comes with Adobe Elements 4.0, but this was of little value to me since I have Elements 5.0. Canon also bundles ArcSoft Photostudio 5.5- which is a great program for quickly scanning and enhancing the images of your film/slides. Also bundled is Omnipage- a OCR to PDF software converter. The software did convert a typed document to Word RTF format, but required me to upgrade to get PDF output. When I tried to upgrade, the web page couldn't be found.The quality is very good. The scan times are very reasonable-- requiring about 3 minutes to scan 4 slides at 150 DPI (which is sufficient for viewing on a computer screen). There is a high pitch squealing noise coming from the scanner-- so this may bother some people. I found the 35mm film/slide holder & accessories to be acceptable- unlike others who found the film holders to be flimsy.The only complaint is there is a very small scratch on my scanner platen glass on the inside of the scanner. I don't think this will affect my scans, but it should not be there.I understand that Canon just came out with a slightly more expensive scanner that doesn't have a warmup time. At 15-20 seconds, I don't find the scanner's warm up time objectionable.I would highly recommend this scanner.
ХроноГость-4DTGY
02.11.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The Cannon Scanner works very well and the instruction manual is very easy to understand. Having the ability to be able to copy, scan and e-mail without needing to go into the software is very convenient.
Гравитон-5AHEU
01.05.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Before I get too far into the review, I should mention I use my scanner for art related purposes. So I do a lot of scanning from sketchbooks of different sizes. I've wanted a flatbed scanner for quite awhile and I recently decided to buy this one. It seemed like a good deal and it was what i wanted. Before that I used an all-in-one device that really didn't give me a good scan. This one fits everything pretty well. The scanning software is good too and easy to figure out. It also seems to scan faster than the all-in-one device and doesn't slow down my computer usage. And I also don't have to plug the scanner in which is absolutely great since I already use the outlet by my pc for a multitude of things. I think next I need to invest in a surge protector. Overall I'd say I'm in love, even though I haven't had it very long.
Капеллан-2COAC
28.07.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is a great scanner in terms of image quality, cost, and size/portability. The best part, though, is ease of use. It will do anything I need it to do, and nothing else, and it does it intuitively, easily, and efficiently. There must be better scanners out there, with more awesome features, but, frankly, I'd rather have a scanner with all the features I want and NOTHING ELSE to clutter up the interface. For scanning text documents & home photos, this unit can't be beat.Oh, yeah, and *perfectly* Mac-compatible.
НаноПилигрим-6DWHR
03.07.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have LiDE 20 for many years (scanned a lot of pictures and a lot of documents). I am still using it regularly. It always perform as expected and it is slim and light and power directly through USB. Since it is so good, I wanted to buy a second one (one at home, one at work). But LiDE 20 is out of market so I bought the LiDE 25. The LiDE 25 Windows driver is different to LiDE 20 but there is no sweat. The price is so low. I was paying $100 for the LiDE 20 but LiDE 25 cost only $50. The LiDE 25 has more features but I just want it to work like LiDE 20 and it did.
Показаны отзывы 793-816 из 1154.
