1163 отзывов пользователей o Canon CanoScan LiDE 300

Пользовались Canon CanoScan LiDE 300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Profile no image

НоваГость-7QBNZ

27.04.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought this scanner about a month ago around the same time I needed my computer system upgraded. I read some reviews that mentioned the software was difficult to install and there were some problems, but since I had a professional set everything up for me during my system upgrade I haven't had a problem.I'm very happy with my scanner right now.
источник
Profile no image

Астрономад-4XTVY

24.08.2007

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I bought this scanner for its ability to scan text. I work for a newspaper and need to use it quite often. It is far better at recognizing characters than the scanner I previously used at work. It takes a little longer to scan a page, but it scans documents the old scanner would have turned into a jumbled mess. Though I read reviews complaining about the noise this scanner makes, I find that it actually makes less noise than the one I used at work.I would give it five stars but it does a few things which annoy me. Sometimes while scanning a window will pop up to ask if I want to upgrade the software. I've yet to find an option to make it stop doing that. There are times when I'll scan a page and it finds an error and will refuse to copy more than a paragraph into a word document. I end up having to rescan the page from that section down. Rescanning is also an issue as each time I scan a new page, I have to close Omnipage or allow several of them to open when reusing the same window would be more efficient.All in all, it's a great scanner for the price. I use it to scan multiple documents about three times a week and I'm glad it bought it. Sure beats having to type everything!
источник
Profile no image

Супернова-5UDDZ

19.05.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

As a college student I don't have alot of scratch to spare but this thing gives me great resolution and is user friendly. It also works with 3rd party software, I can be working in Photoshop and just import directly into the program.All in all a great product.
источник
Profile no image

Сириус-7OWFP

19.06.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This scanner does exactly what I need it to do: scan checks for deposit. It works quickly and is a breeze to use. Would recommend to family and friends.
источник
Profile no image

КиберНаблюдатель-1EHCY

03.05.2007

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I've had the CanoScan LiDE 600F for about a month now, and I've been very impressed. It replaced my old Canon scanner that didn't survive a move - so I was looking for similar functionality. I LOVE the fact that it draws power from it's USB cord - I wouldn't have considered it if it didn't. The footprint isn't bad, either, especially if you keep it on it's stand (that is, scanning vertically). Also, the fact that it's a USB 2 connection makes it much faster than previous scanners that I've had (only USB 1), so it zooms through a scan even at higher resolutions (I only top out at 600 dpi). But the best feature of all is the cover that opens a full 180 degrees! I scan a lot of illustration boards that are 14"x17", so that makes things much, much easier.I'm a Mac user - and I agree with previous reviews that the included software is a bit disorienting for those used to more "Mac-like" apps. But, it does the job. I mean, how much time do you really spend in the scanning software? It was essential for me that I could scan directly from within Photoshop, and the plugin that comes is straightforward and flexible. Very nice. I don't use much in the way of "image enhancement" (I'm a PS junkie), so I can't tell you if any functionality is missing there. Also, the OCR software that is included is pretty decent. A little unintuitive, but performs well.In summary: if you're looking for a fast, flexible scanner that has a small footprint, USB power, and you're using it just to capture images that you will edit yourself later anyway, this scanner is damn near perfect.
источник
Profile no image

Дроид-0YLNA

27.05.2008

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I find the product simple to use and perfect to include in my backpack with my laptop computer. It is compact and light weight. It is powered by my laptop. My only disappointment is that it is slow to scan an image.
источник
Profile no image

Пандорец-3VYPT

01.02.2007

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I lost virtually all printed photos from my first 25 years of life in a freak flood about 12 years ago, at a time when the digital photography we take for granted today was nothing more than a dream.I bought this scanner to (i) digitise surviving negatives and prints such that I will never suffer the same fate again, whether due to flood or fire or other catastrophe, and (ii) ensure I have high quality scans of ultrasound images of my daughter to be, for the same reason.So to my first use of the scanner, negatives from what may transpire to have been a once-in-a-lifetime trip to south-east Asia. One of the shots was of a Bangkok Airways De Havilland Dash-8 landing at Samui airport (the aircraft I was about to step onto to return to Bangkok for an onward flight to Kuala Lumpur). The negative was obviously significantly flawed, and not at all pleasing to the eye as a consequence. I used all corrective options in the supplied ArcSoft software to correct those flaws, then printed the corrected scan on my Canon i9900 printer. The flaws in the image were gone and the print exceeded the quality of the original.Onto my second use -- ultrasounds. I had scanned images of the early ultrasounds using an HP 7130xi AIO, and been very dissatisfied with the quality of those images and of the i9900 prints I created from those scans. I used the 8600F to scan those very same images. The improvement in quality from the HP 7130xi to the 8600F is an order of magnitude improvement. Moreover, I am thrilled that I did not spend more on a higher-end scanner because when printed at 6 x 4, I cannot see how image quality could be improved.I cannot say anything about the medium format or slide scanning capabilities of this scanner, but for negatives and prints the quality is outrageously good for the price paid. This product represents fantastic value for money.
источник
Profile no image

Интеллектор-6NBMG

18.04.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I use it primarily to scan my lecture notes and paste them in OneNote since it's impossible to type algebraic equasions in Word or OneNote directly. For this purpose the scanner works like a charm.I also scanned a few photographs and pictures from magazines with very good resulting quality.USB power and small size are definite pluses.
источник
Profile no image

Супернова-7ZQLT

14.06.2007

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I've been using the Canoscan LiDE25 for over a year and a half...no mechanical problems. I use it primarily for scanning/storing text docs and for emailing & faxing.I bought it in 2005 when I got a new PC,finally upgrading from ME to XP. My old scanner was a Visioneer that I loved, but read that the old Visioneer driver could really screw up XP and that a new driver had to be downloaded (which included ~20 steps of installation instruction). A lot of reviewers said that they had system wide problems with the new driver as well...not worth the risk...so I looked for a replacement; the smallest,least expensive scanner on Amazon and ended up with the Lide25.ProsSize-wafer thin. Nice!Price-unbeatablePower supply-USB connection only with no need for an electrical outlet is a wonderful feature...frees up a slot in the powerstrip!Scans well-probably is not the fastest in the world, but quite acceptable for home use.Cons...I thought it was just me, but as other reviewers have indicated, the software has more whistles and bells than I need at the expense of simplicity. I really miss Visioneer's software that included a single desktop-type interface from where you could perform all filing,saving, editing, and secondary (fax/print/email) functions. If Canoscan has this capability, it is not readily apparent.If not for the needless complexity of the software I would give the product 5 stars.
источник
Profile no image

Туманник-7RWKV

21.04.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I needed a photo scanner quickly for a family reunion and this was perfect. It shipped very quickly and was very easy to setup. The immediate results were impressive. It is very light weight and does not require a separate power supply, which I really like since this device will travel with us to other family reunions.
источник
Profile no image

Туманник-5XVLL

03.04.2007

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Thousands of color slides taken during my sweet school days brought many wonderful memories. Unfortunately, most of them have been discolored, faded, spotted, or scratched. For years, I have set one of my retirement projects to be to restore some of those memorable pictures. And for several years, I have been waiting to see the price of Nikon CoolScan dropping, but it has not happened. With regard to this Canon scanner, I have initially been hesitating for a while as I really did not have confidence that flatbed scanner can cater for the high grain of slides. I have several flatbed scanners over the past years and none of them could give me satisfactory results on slides. Encouraged by positive reviews on this scanner, the affordable price, the reputation of Canon products, and most of all, my pleasant experience with Amazon purchases in the past, I decided to give this one a try.The product arrived on time in good condition as always with Amazon services. After one month of operation, I already scanned hundreds of slides and brought many of them to vivid conditions. With slides developed commercially some 50 years ago, the grains are not comparable to professional qualities. Therefore, I consider this scanner is more than adequate to digitize those color slides, positives, and grayscale negatives. My recent work proved this statement. I am totally satisfied with this scanner. If I have to pick a small concern, I believe the film guide looks to be a little flimsy. However, I think with careful handling, it should last for a long time, and hopefully until I will finish converting all my historical photos!
источник
Profile no image

Лунатик-7PYJD

18.01.2008

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I am writing this review for the benefit of iMac users (flat panel) who have difficulties installing or re-installing the software. The trouble during installation is due to the lack of authority. Therefore, log in as system administrator and perform the installation as such. Make sure that you first install the Canosan software and afterwards the LIDE 50 driver. I used the 4.1.3 version of Canoscan (CSTb4130MXE.dmg) and the 7.3.1 version of the driver (LiDE50_OSX_v7134X.app.sit). Works perfectly and always.The LIDE 50 is a competent scanner and, if you can get hold of one, one of the cheapest around.
источник
Profile no image

Астероид-9YEJQ

20.04.2008

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I had rated it as 4 star, because it deserves it. This is the best price to performance ratio. It is very light and the setup is easy. One of the best thing is it is USB powered so no more power cords. If you are looking for a good scanner you should look no further and go for it.
источник
Profile no image

НеоВояжер-3NKHR

12.04.2008

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

This seems to be a great little scanner, especially for the reasonable price. The pictures do not look very clear when I scan them so it is hard to figure out exactly what the printed picture will look like ; however, when I get the picture color right, it prints a very good picture.
источник
Profile no image

Спектроник-9AURV

28.03.2008

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

The Scanner works perfectly fine, it picks up a good deal of details in pictures and works for my purpose, scanning old pictures to put into jpg formats. The one complaint I have is it's pretty loud. While it's actually scanning the photo it makes a good deal of noise, but it still does the job and does it well.
источник
Profile no image

Спектр-4EANN

16.02.2007

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought this to scan 35 mm slides. Period. Opened it up, set it up, followed the instructions. Didn't work with slides. Tried it on two more computers. Still didn't work with slides. Studied and re-studied documentation (real men don't ask for directions). Kept getting error message saying that I should check for "protective sheet". Tried the internet and Canon web site for help, couldn't find what I needed. Finally broke down and called them. It seems that the "protective sheet" is a 1/4" + piece of hard black plastic with a piece of black foam attached and a white background on the whole thing--try sleeping on a sheet like that! After talking with the tech reps (all spoke perfect, understandable English) got it working. It does a great job, making old slides look like new (and I'm talking OLD--like 40 years old).It's a great low-cost high-function scanner that does the job that you may have to pay $1,000 for in a dedicated scanner--sure beats paying 50 cents to $1 to have each slide scanned by a service. The process is slow--does 4 slides at a shot and takes about 5 minutes to do the magic. The magic is just that--the scanner hums and whirrrs for many cycles but turns lead into gold (almost). This thing comes with a nifty slide carrier (in addition to raw film carriers and others) and does all sorts of other scanning tasks. I bought it only for the 35 mm slide thing so can't comment on other scanning abilities.All of this said, it's a great machine, well made, low cost, and does an excellent job.Amazon rocks, naturally. I did the free shipping thing yet got the machine only 1 day after ordering. I didn't check other prices but with Amazon service, who cares.
источник
Profile no image

Фотон-9VPFQ

26.03.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I love this scanner especially the "no ac adapter" part.It is easy to flip out and stow away. Also, I love the part where it sits at an angle and you can just slide a paper into it to be scanned.As far as quality, I am no graphics specialist but it does a superb job for documents and images alike.
источник
Profile no image

Сириус-7ZJXX

25.04.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I was skeptical when I saw this only cost $49, but it works great. Not very fast, but it does a good job on the scan. It also takes up very little space on my desk. I would recommend it.
источник
Profile no image

Гелиос-5VDLX

12.04.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I am very pleased with this scanner. Easy to install and no problems scanning from pictures, to documents. I like the fact that I didnt need to buy an all in one. As it is much more reasonable price for this.
источник
Profile no image

НаноПилигрим-7JYXU

07.01.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I'm really happy with this scanner. It exactly meets my needs of being able to scan photographs and documents to be able to save them on my computer. I also love the "copy" feature that enables you to scan a document and immediately send the result to your printer to produce a copy. I only wish that it would also save an electronic version simultaneously. I also enjoy that it get its power via the USB port, eliminating the need for yet another cable. This is an inexpensive scanner that is perfect for casual home use.
источник
Profile no image

Аэронавт-8FQQL

13.02.2008

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I started off using this scanner with Windows XP, fow whoch it barely worked (the drivers and software were terrible). Then I bought a Mac, and the scanner was useless, as the drivers didn't work at all.I finally tried connecting the scanner to an Ubuntu (9, 10, 11+) machine running SANE drivers, and surprise -- it works flawlessly! So I'm now using it on a daily basis, six years later.
источник
Profile no image

НаноРейдер-3GVAN

09.01.2007

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I bought this scanner to digitize about 500 old 127 format film slides which had faded over the years. The Canon product literature clearly states that this scanner will accept these slides. Well, the literature is incorrect, and the Canon tecnical representative admitted, to his surprise, that there was an error. 127 film slides are mounted in the standard 2x2-inch mounts, same outside dimensions as 35mm slides; however, the image is much larger than 35mm, being 40mm square (about 1.5 inches). When set up to scan slides, the CanoScan 8600 automatically crops the scan area to 35mm film size and cuts off much of the 127 slide image. The Canon tech rep was able to find a work-around that allows me to scan these slides at full image, but it is a rather crude way to do it, resulting in many more manual steps to accomplish the task. BUT, it does work after you get used to the process.By the way, I did not find any other scanner on the market that says it would scan 127 format slides.This scanner comes with Photoshop Elements 4.0 as well as other software. I also purchased the book "Photoshop Elements 5.0, The Missing Manual" by Barbara Brundage. If you are new to scanning, and especially if you are new to Photoshop as I was, I HIGHLY recommend that you buy this book. It literally holds you by the hand and guides you thru the steps to do whatever it is that you're attempting to do with your scanner. Elements does not come with an instruction book, only "on-line" help is available, and it is not easy to use because it assumes you already know how to use Photoshop Elements, which is very powerful, but also very complicated until you spend a lot of time with it. Buy the book, you'll be glad you did!
источник
Profile no image

ТерраБот-2HEFF

22.11.2007

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

No instruction manual, a couple of paragraphs and I guess you are supposed to know how to use it. Help online answers questions that aren't understandable, if you could understand them you wouldn't ask the questions. No explanation of how to add a scan to a file or to email it. It's not intuative so I guess you need training(!) to operate it. I'd send it back and order another model but I'm afraid I'd get the same results. I checked at a local computer repair and he agreed figuring it out is not for the novice. Canon, be ashamed.......I guess I'll need training that cost more than your product.....
источник
Profile no image

ОмниКод-9DZUA

07.08.2007

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I'm a big fan of Canon products in general however this product really is making me rethink things. It gives decent image quality but is very noisy, slow, and causes strange computer issues. It draws so much power through it's USB cable that I have to unplug it from my computer before I boot up or else it will take an extra 10 minutes! I am not able to even use it with my USB hub because it draws more power than my total hub supports (which is ridiculous because I have no problem when the camera, card reader and mp3 player are simultaneously plugged into the hub and being used). I didn't find the software to be an issue. The instructions are clear and easy to follow. There are a lot of bundled products though and it may take a moment to read and follow instructions. A few years ago I got a free no-name scanner when I signed up for ISP service and I'd take it back over the Canon LiDE 25 in a heartbeat if only the software would run on XP.
источник
Показаны отзывы 889-912 из 1163.

Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой

8.9/10 баллов

Canon CanoScan LiDE 300

1163 отзывов

от 8986.00 руб.

8.7/10 баллов

Canon CanoScan LiDE 400

558 отзывов

от 10775.00 руб.

8.7/10 баллов

Epson WorkForce DS-870

23 отзывов

от 54585.00 руб.

8.6/10 баллов

Canon P-215II

167 отзывов

от 50650.00 руб.

8.6/10 баллов

Plustek OpticFilm 8200i SE

146 отзывов

от 75138.00 руб.

8.6/10 баллов

Plustek OpticFilm 8100

45 отзывов

от 64424.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

Plustek OpticSlim 2610

30 отзывов

от 33677.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

Epson WorkForce DS-1630

112 отзывов

от 24999.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

Epson Perfection V19

352 отзывов

от 11297.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

HP ScanJet Pro 2000 s2

23 отзывов

от 48200.00 руб.

8.4/10 баллов

Canon ImageFORMULA P-208II

38 отзывов

от 28490.00 руб.

8.2/10 баллов

Epson Perfection V39

615 отзывов

от 28067.00 руб.

8.2/10 баллов

Avision FB10

50 отзывов

от 9923.00 руб.

8.1/10 баллов

Avision FB2280E

7 отзывов

от 8650.00 руб.

8.1/10 баллов

Epson FastFoto FF-680W

330 отзывов

от 149900.00 руб.

8/10 баллов

Fujitsu FI-5000N скансервер

17 отзывов

от 5500.00 руб.

8/10 баллов

Canon DR-C225

33 отзывов

от 52809.00 руб.

7.9/10 баллов

Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai

29 отзывов

от 177809.00 руб.

7.8/10 баллов

Canon DR-M260

16 отзывов

от 141456.00 руб.

7.7/10 баллов

Canon image Formula DR-C240

10 отзывов

от 51897.00 руб.