1154 отзывов пользователей o Canon CanoScan LiDE 300

Пользовались Canon CanoScan LiDE 300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Profile no image

Интеллектор-6NBMG

18.04.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I use it primarily to scan my lecture notes and paste them in OneNote since it's impossible to type algebraic equasions in Word or OneNote directly. For this purpose the scanner works like a charm.I also scanned a few photographs and pictures from magazines with very good resulting quality.USB power and small size are definite pluses.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Супернова-7ZQLT

14.06.2007

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I've been using the Canoscan LiDE25 for over a year and a half...no mechanical problems. I use it primarily for scanning/storing text docs and for emailing & faxing.I bought it in 2005 when I got a new PC,finally upgrading from ME to XP. My old scanner was a Visioneer that I loved, but read that the old Visioneer driver could really screw up XP and that a new driver had to be downloaded (which included ~20 steps of installation instruction). A lot of reviewers said that they had system wide problems with the new driver as well...not worth the risk...so I looked for a replacement; the smallest,least expensive scanner on Amazon and ended up with the Lide25.ProsSize-wafer thin. Nice!Price-unbeatablePower supply-USB connection only with no need for an electrical outlet is a wonderful feature...frees up a slot in the powerstrip!Scans well-probably is not the fastest in the world, but quite acceptable for home use.Cons...I thought it was just me, but as other reviewers have indicated, the software has more whistles and bells than I need at the expense of simplicity. I really miss Visioneer's software that included a single desktop-type interface from where you could perform all filing,saving, editing, and secondary (fax/print/email) functions. If Canoscan has this capability, it is not readily apparent.If not for the needless complexity of the software I would give the product 5 stars.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Туманник-7RWKV

21.04.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I needed a photo scanner quickly for a family reunion and this was perfect. It shipped very quickly and was very easy to setup. The immediate results were impressive. It is very light weight and does not require a separate power supply, which I really like since this device will travel with us to other family reunions.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Туманник-5XVLL

03.04.2007

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Thousands of color slides taken during my sweet school days brought many wonderful memories. Unfortunately, most of them have been discolored, faded, spotted, or scratched. For years, I have set one of my retirement projects to be to restore some of those memorable pictures. And for several years, I have been waiting to see the price of Nikon CoolScan dropping, but it has not happened. With regard to this Canon scanner, I have initially been hesitating for a while as I really did not have confidence that flatbed scanner can cater for the high grain of slides. I have several flatbed scanners over the past years and none of them could give me satisfactory results on slides. Encouraged by positive reviews on this scanner, the affordable price, the reputation of Canon products, and most of all, my pleasant experience with Amazon purchases in the past, I decided to give this one a try.The product arrived on time in good condition as always with Amazon services. After one month of operation, I already scanned hundreds of slides and brought many of them to vivid conditions. With slides developed commercially some 50 years ago, the grains are not comparable to professional qualities. Therefore, I consider this scanner is more than adequate to digitize those color slides, positives, and grayscale negatives. My recent work proved this statement. I am totally satisfied with this scanner. If I have to pick a small concern, I believe the film guide looks to be a little flimsy. However, I think with careful handling, it should last for a long time, and hopefully until I will finish converting all my historical photos!
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Лунатик-7PYJD

18.01.2008

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I am writing this review for the benefit of iMac users (flat panel) who have difficulties installing or re-installing the software. The trouble during installation is due to the lack of authority. Therefore, log in as system administrator and perform the installation as such. Make sure that you first install the Canosan software and afterwards the LIDE 50 driver. I used the 4.1.3 version of Canoscan (CSTb4130MXE.dmg) and the 7.3.1 version of the driver (LiDE50_OSX_v7134X.app.sit). Works perfectly and always.The LIDE 50 is a competent scanner and, if you can get hold of one, one of the cheapest around.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Астероид-9YEJQ

20.04.2008

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I had rated it as 4 star, because it deserves it. This is the best price to performance ratio. It is very light and the setup is easy. One of the best thing is it is USB powered so no more power cords. If you are looking for a good scanner you should look no further and go for it.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

НеоВояжер-3NKHR

12.04.2008

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

This seems to be a great little scanner, especially for the reasonable price. The pictures do not look very clear when I scan them so it is hard to figure out exactly what the printed picture will look like ; however, when I get the picture color right, it prints a very good picture.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Спектроник-9AURV

28.03.2008

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

The Scanner works perfectly fine, it picks up a good deal of details in pictures and works for my purpose, scanning old pictures to put into jpg formats. The one complaint I have is it's pretty loud. While it's actually scanning the photo it makes a good deal of noise, but it still does the job and does it well.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Спектр-4EANN

16.02.2007

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought this to scan 35 mm slides. Period. Opened it up, set it up, followed the instructions. Didn't work with slides. Tried it on two more computers. Still didn't work with slides. Studied and re-studied documentation (real men don't ask for directions). Kept getting error message saying that I should check for "protective sheet". Tried the internet and Canon web site for help, couldn't find what I needed. Finally broke down and called them. It seems that the "protective sheet" is a 1/4" + piece of hard black plastic with a piece of black foam attached and a white background on the whole thing--try sleeping on a sheet like that! After talking with the tech reps (all spoke perfect, understandable English) got it working. It does a great job, making old slides look like new (and I'm talking OLD--like 40 years old).It's a great low-cost high-function scanner that does the job that you may have to pay $1,000 for in a dedicated scanner--sure beats paying 50 cents to $1 to have each slide scanned by a service. The process is slow--does 4 slides at a shot and takes about 5 minutes to do the magic. The magic is just that--the scanner hums and whirrrs for many cycles but turns lead into gold (almost). This thing comes with a nifty slide carrier (in addition to raw film carriers and others) and does all sorts of other scanning tasks. I bought it only for the 35 mm slide thing so can't comment on other scanning abilities.All of this said, it's a great machine, well made, low cost, and does an excellent job.Amazon rocks, naturally. I did the free shipping thing yet got the machine only 1 day after ordering. I didn't check other prices but with Amazon service, who cares.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Фотон-9VPFQ

26.03.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I love this scanner especially the "no ac adapter" part.It is easy to flip out and stow away. Also, I love the part where it sits at an angle and you can just slide a paper into it to be scanned.As far as quality, I am no graphics specialist but it does a superb job for documents and images alike.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Сириус-7ZJXX

25.04.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I was skeptical when I saw this only cost $49, but it works great. Not very fast, but it does a good job on the scan. It also takes up very little space on my desk. I would recommend it.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Гелиос-5VDLX

12.04.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I am very pleased with this scanner. Easy to install and no problems scanning from pictures, to documents. I like the fact that I didnt need to buy an all in one. As it is much more reasonable price for this.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

НаноПилигрим-7JYXU

07.01.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I'm really happy with this scanner. It exactly meets my needs of being able to scan photographs and documents to be able to save them on my computer. I also love the "copy" feature that enables you to scan a document and immediately send the result to your printer to produce a copy. I only wish that it would also save an electronic version simultaneously. I also enjoy that it get its power via the USB port, eliminating the need for yet another cable. This is an inexpensive scanner that is perfect for casual home use.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Аэронавт-8FQQL

13.02.2008

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I started off using this scanner with Windows XP, fow whoch it barely worked (the drivers and software were terrible). Then I bought a Mac, and the scanner was useless, as the drivers didn't work at all.I finally tried connecting the scanner to an Ubuntu (9, 10, 11+) machine running SANE drivers, and surprise -- it works flawlessly! So I'm now using it on a daily basis, six years later.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

НаноРейдер-3GVAN

09.01.2007

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I bought this scanner to digitize about 500 old 127 format film slides which had faded over the years. The Canon product literature clearly states that this scanner will accept these slides. Well, the literature is incorrect, and the Canon tecnical representative admitted, to his surprise, that there was an error. 127 film slides are mounted in the standard 2x2-inch mounts, same outside dimensions as 35mm slides; however, the image is much larger than 35mm, being 40mm square (about 1.5 inches). When set up to scan slides, the CanoScan 8600 automatically crops the scan area to 35mm film size and cuts off much of the 127 slide image. The Canon tech rep was able to find a work-around that allows me to scan these slides at full image, but it is a rather crude way to do it, resulting in many more manual steps to accomplish the task. BUT, it does work after you get used to the process.By the way, I did not find any other scanner on the market that says it would scan 127 format slides.This scanner comes with Photoshop Elements 4.0 as well as other software. I also purchased the book "Photoshop Elements 5.0, The Missing Manual" by Barbara Brundage. If you are new to scanning, and especially if you are new to Photoshop as I was, I HIGHLY recommend that you buy this book. It literally holds you by the hand and guides you thru the steps to do whatever it is that you're attempting to do with your scanner. Elements does not come with an instruction book, only "on-line" help is available, and it is not easy to use because it assumes you already know how to use Photoshop Elements, which is very powerful, but also very complicated until you spend a lot of time with it. Buy the book, you'll be glad you did!
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

ТерраБот-2HEFF

22.11.2007

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

No instruction manual, a couple of paragraphs and I guess you are supposed to know how to use it. Help online answers questions that aren't understandable, if you could understand them you wouldn't ask the questions. No explanation of how to add a scan to a file or to email it. It's not intuative so I guess you need training(!) to operate it. I'd send it back and order another model but I'm afraid I'd get the same results. I checked at a local computer repair and he agreed figuring it out is not for the novice. Canon, be ashamed.......I guess I'll need training that cost more than your product.....
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

ОмниКод-9DZUA

07.08.2007

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I'm a big fan of Canon products in general however this product really is making me rethink things. It gives decent image quality but is very noisy, slow, and causes strange computer issues. It draws so much power through it's USB cable that I have to unplug it from my computer before I boot up or else it will take an extra 10 minutes! I am not able to even use it with my USB hub because it draws more power than my total hub supports (which is ridiculous because I have no problem when the camera, card reader and mp3 player are simultaneously plugged into the hub and being used). I didn't find the software to be an issue. The instructions are clear and easy to follow. There are a lot of bundled products though and it may take a moment to read and follow instructions. A few years ago I got a free no-name scanner when I signed up for ISP service and I'd take it back over the Canon LiDE 25 in a heartbeat if only the software would run on XP.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Фотон-3ZQCM

08.02.2007

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

The power supply on my hp5470C finally bit the dust, and this scanner doesn't cost much more than an HP power supply. plus, it's a lot more portable.i read the earlier reviews and was prepared for noise and slow speeds. i was pleasantly surprised.WRT noise, the scanner makes a noticeable mechanical whine when preview scanning at 150DPI. at 300 DPI or more, it's much quieter. i measured the sound output from about a foot away, and it's roughly 56 dB (A weighted). that's not loud.WRT speed, a full page is roughly 15 seconds at 300 DPI color. i tried scanning a dollar bill at 1200 DPI to get a feel for the resolution - the 1200 DPI scan took about a minute and a half, of just the bill.sharpness was excellent. i could zoom in on the engraving on the bill with very nice results. color was good, and sharpness was fine.on text scanning, i tried OCR'ing a page of the instructions that were written in small (about 6pt) type. the included ScanSoft Omnipage software got 100% accuracy.the three buttons on the front of the scanner were easy to configure, and worked very well. a high quality copy of a color photo came out very nicely, when printed directly to my HP inkjet.the form factor is great. it's about as thick as my hand, is roughly 14 3/4" x 10 1/4". weight is very light. it'd travel very easily in a briefcase or backpack, and i would have no compunction using it in a library (from a noise standpoint). it takes power from the USB cable, so would work very well w/ a notebook.overall, i'm extremely pleased with this purchase. it exceeded my expectations.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Интеллектор-1QSUH

29.08.2007

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Fantastic!!! To use this scanner has been thrilling. I have been using 35mm SLR cameras since the 70's and have many slides and negatives. This scanner was purchased to digitize them. The results are excellent. Even though it will scan up to 2400 dpi, 800 dpi makes very pleasing pictures with files that are about 150k in size. Colors are brilliant and snappy. they look better than any other way that I have viewed them. The software that was encluded is easy to use and powerful. It helps to have some photography experience to know what some of the functions are. Sure beats using a darkroom. My favorite part of this software is the scratch removal, cropping features, exposure, and contrast altering. Quick & easy.At 800 dpi each slide or negative scan takes about 45 seconds. This scanner exceeds my expectations!
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

ТерраБот-3OIFC

06.11.2006

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I had the 8400F at home and was pleased with it, so I bought the 8600F for work when I needed to scan in a bunch of graphics. For this job, I found it to be a really fast scanner. Both the preview and the final scan of the color graphics were speedy. Sorry, but I did not use the scanner to scan negatives, so I cannot comment on that.You can tell more about a company when something goes wrong than when everything goes right. The scanner I received had problems with streaking during the scans. I called Canon and got right through to tech support. They spoke English (meaning, it didn't sound like an overseas call center) and determined after 20 mintues that the scanner was bad. Two days later I received a brand new replacement that worked great. I highly recommend buying the Canon brand based on this experience.I have no regrets buying this scanner, but here are a few things that Canon could do to improve it:1) The USB cable was a tad short (about 4.5 foot). A 6-foot cable would have been better.2) The top of the "scan area" is by the hinge of the lid. That means you have to open the lid wide to put something in. For areas where you are limited in vertical space, it would be better if this were moved to the front of the scanner.3) The scanner cuts off just a hair along the edge of the item being scanned. The edges are how you keep an item "squared" on the scanner, yet 1mm or less along the edge was not included in the scan.The software that comes with the CanoScan is good, especially Adobe Photoshop Elements 4.0, which is always rated well in the PC magazines. The CanoScan driver is flexible with plenty of options for the advanced user, as well as basic options for the not-so-advanced user.I expected a good quality scanner, and was surprised at the speed. I recommend the CanoScan 8600F to you.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Синтрон-9FYHC

01.10.2007

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Very easy to use with a simple user interface that should be good for the average non-tech user. Scans very well all the way up to the reported 1200dpi. You do have to look to find where to adjust the resolution. It is a little slower due to the fact that it has no power supply (which is a very good thing) and gets its power from the USB port which has limited available power. Be sure you have a "powered" USB port. The long-term reliability should be very good because it consumes so little power. I've always loved Canon products and have never been let down. Small, lightweight, cheap, low-power, well engineered, good software, 1200dpi resolution... What else do you want?
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Пандорец-7ESAC

19.01.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

USB powered means just one cable. Included software makes scanning a breeze, and lets you change the one touch settings. One touch really works, push a button, and the image is saved to your favorite location. Quality of the scans is very good. Bundled programs are easy to learn and useful.
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

ИнфраГость-9ZBTK

15.02.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Film scan quality exceeded my expectation considering its scanning mechanism and price. If you want to feel good old way of taking photos, this is a must have! =]
оригинал отзыва
Profile no image

Кронос-0OTIE

18.09.2007

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

With the film scanner attachment door closed and turned upside down you will find 3 pairs of rubber tabs (I am assumming all LiDE 600Fs are the same as mine). These Rubber tabs allow you to hold 3 mounted slides in place while you turn the film scanner attachment over and place it on the scanning bed. From here scan as you would for film. Not the best for someone who has a lot of slides to scan in a hurry, thus I rate the scanner as a 4 instead of a 5Sorry made a mistake. The software is too smart. It looks for the gaps between frames to seperate files, and the mounts muck this up. Clearly the hardware designers and the programs had a laps in communication.
оригинал отзыва
Показаны отзывы 841-864 из 1154.

Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой

8.9/10 баллов

Canon CanoScan LiDE 300

1154 отзывов

от 6771.00 руб.

8.7/10 баллов

Canon CanoScan LiDE 400

548 отзывов

от 9431.00 руб.

8.7/10 баллов

Epson WorkForce DS-870

22 отзывов

от 40889.00 руб.

8.6/10 баллов

Canon P-215II

167 отзывов

от 188386.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

Plustek OpticFilm 8200i SE

142 отзывов

от 75138.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

Plustek OpticFilm 8100

42 отзывов

от 64977.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

Epson Perfection V19

344 отзывов

от 10193.00 руб.

8.4/10 баллов

Plustek OpticSlim 2610

27 отзывов

от 10983.00 руб.

8.4/10 баллов

Epson WorkForce DS-1630

106 отзывов

от 26188.00 руб.

8.4/10 баллов

HP ScanJet Pro 2000 s2

21 отзывов

от 70481.00 руб.

8.3/10 баллов

Canon ImageFORMULA P-208II

36 отзывов

от 26097.00 руб.

8.2/10 баллов

Epson Perfection V39

614 отзывов

от 10530.00 руб.

8.2/10 баллов

Brother ADS-1700W

38 отзывов

от 92330.00 руб.

8.1/10 баллов

Epson FastFoto FF-680W

328 отзывов

от 132900.00 руб.

8/10 баллов

Brother DS-640 (DS640R1)

191 отзывов

от 23490.00 руб.

8/10 баллов

Fujitsu FI-5000N скансервер

17 отзывов

от 5500.00 руб.

8/10 баллов

Avision FB10

45 отзывов

от 9607.00 руб.

7.9/10 баллов

Canon DR-C225

28 отзывов

от 43146.00 руб.

7.9/10 баллов

Avision FB2280E

5 отзывов

от 6650.00 руб.

7.8/10 баллов

Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai

27 отзывов

от 105480.00 руб.