Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D7100 Kit

Покупкой безумно довольна. Для первой "зеркалки" отличный выбор. Качество снимков и видео заслуживают высокой оценки. Советую всем! Я не пожалела, что приобрела это "чудо"!

Подарили эту камеру на новый год. я в восторге. маленькая, удобная в эксплуатации. до этого фотографировала только на цифру. когда я взяла в руки мыльницу, то поняла - не отдам.) очень хорошо подходит для начинающих, и детей. весом около 1кг, для меня это не тяжело, а для взрослого и тем более. одним словом, покупайте - не пожалеете.

Фотоаппарат купила для дочки - дошло быстро, упаковка хорошая, нареканий никаких. Ребенок в восторге!!! Спасибо Озону!!!

В чем отличие от модели Nikon D3100 Kit 18-55VR ?http://www.ozon.ru/context/detail/id/5526863/

Доставили быстро спасибо ОЗОНУ!!!! На автомате снимки нормальные, но хочется большего, сижу разбираюсь в настройках!

Классный фотик! Очень понравился. Пользуюсь недели 3, еще до конца не разобралась в настройках, но уже довольна. Доставка 2 недели, упаковано очень хорошо. Спасибо озону!

Фотоаппарат хороший. Делает качественые снимки даже если у снимающего кривые руки. Немного растроила даставка. Ждал около месяца данный товар

Прекрасная модель, качество снимков просто превосходное, фотоаппарат очень удобно лежит в руке. А качество оптики даёт огромный простор для творчества!Спасибо озону =)

Пользуюсь уже почти год.Нареканик пока нет.Очень удобен поворачивающийся дисплей.Покупала не на озоне и за 23 тыс.,но в комплекте была карта на 1 гб.Всем советую!

Купил недавно сей девайс,-очередная и далеко не последняя покупка в интернет-мегамаркете OZON.RU.В оригинальной упаковке,не вскрытый!Не то что в некоторых интернет-магазинах и не только...(так называемая,-"предпродажная проверка").Нареканий нет вообще!Отличный апаратище!Всё продумано грамотно.При использовании дополнительной оптики профи- класса,использовании карты памяти Transcend SDХC Card Class 10 64Gb (покупалась тут же!), показатели фото и видео ничем не уступают камерам профессионального уровня и доставляют бесконечное удовольствие!Тем более,что откидной экран есть только в этой модели!!!Соотношение:цена-качество в данной фотокамере очень привлекательно,как ни крути!Особенно если учесть,что приобретается Любой товар в OZON.RU наложенным платежом!!!Доставка (за очень небольшую плату),происходит быстро и качественно в любую точку России! Вывод напрашивается сам,-берите без сомнений,раздумий и угрызений!Огромное спасибо Всем сотрудникам Супер интернет-магазина OZON.RU!Удачи и процветания!OZON Рулит!!!

У вас на картинке фотоаппарат с объективом VR, а в описании товара об этом ничего не сказано. Так какой все таки объектив?

Фотоаппарат действительно замечательный! Очень нравится как качество фотографий, так и качественный материал корпуса. Экран ну просто шикарный. Расположение кнопок очень порадовало, удобно для правши. Замечательное качество фото. Полный детальный обзор, фото, сделанные этим аппаратиком, и характеристики смотрите здесь http://irecommend.ru/content/kachestvo-na-vysote-nikon-venikov-ne-vyazhet

цену снизили на 1 тыс.так что сейчас получается карта на 16 Гб в подароквыгодное предложение

Эргономичная, умная, качество фоток в формате RAW выше всяких похвал.

это супер фот !!! берите не пожалеете!!! особенно по такой цене!!)

Did I mention noise? With 40 years as a Nikon shooter with almost all their cameras (starting with Nikormats) and god know how many lenses, I know a little about photography. I was also a beta tester on the original Photoshop, I'm that old. So I bought this camera as a replacement for my D90 as my DX shooter for birds, with the 300af-s +1.4TC combo. I knew about the small buffer -(hey its REALLY friggin small and bites you just at the wrong moment, to the point you loose all chimping capability without a camera restart) but expected a big resolution upgrade. The fact is whatever marginally you gain in resolution the tradeoff is really bad noise in the shadows at any iso because the sensor Nikon had utilized for this camera is the same 24Mpix APS-C sensor as the D5200 and entry-level D3200 models. The pixel density is equivalent to that of a 56-Mpix full-frame 35mm camera!! Sounds great, right? Not so fast, they cram that many pixels be using the smallest possible "pitch" measured in microns.Let's compare cameras shall we?D700 - 8.45 microns, FX, 12MP - winner - look at the prices asked for USED copies!D4 - 7.3m, FX, 16MPD610 - 5.9m, FX, 24MPD800 - 4.88m, FX, 36MPD7000 - 4.78m, DX, 24MPD7100 - 3.9m, DX, 24MP ---- DOWNGRADE from the D7000D5200 - 3.9m, DX, 24MPD3200 - 3.84m, DX, 24MPAll pixels collect the same amount of noise, but larger pixels collect more of the "good" data than smaller pixels. With all else equal, a larger pixel will result in a higher quality image (less noise) than a smaller one. The pixels of the D7100 are so small my D200 produces better images that need less work in post-processing.People ooh and aah over the resolution of this camera, but after you run the image through your noise reduction program - which ads blur - you are throwing that extra resolution away. No complaints about build, focus are other factors, those are all to taste. Do yourself a favor and pick up a D700 or a D610 and compare the image to the D7100. Creamy goodness.

I had the Nikon D 7000 before and loved that camera with all my heart. It was a loyal friend and companion for thousands of pictures, some were mentioned by the editors of National Geographic on their website, others won prizes in a photo magazine. So you see, it performed well and helped me show my creativity.The D 7000 was a superb camera but has a bigger brother now, the D 7100. The difference is huge in sheer sharpness, clarity and brightness. I was lucky enough to test the 7100 out at the same location, same month, same event and at the same light conditions two years apart. The difference is in quality ( sharpness, light sensitivity and brightness) is truly astounding!Whoever comes from the 7000 will have a very easy time adjusting. Some of the buttons are at different locations, one has to get used to that but one will eventually.The only two things I don't understand is why Nikon made the front dial on the right side slimmer than on the D7000. The dial on the 7000 stuck out a touch wider and had a better feel to it.And last I have to say there is one thing I think is a bad design on both cameras. I already was bothered by it on the 7000 and can not believe they didn't fix this design flaw with the newer model... it used to happen ALL the time that after I put my camera back in the photo bag, the little compartment in which the memory sticks are slipped open by itself.This should not happen and should be double secured. To make sure this does not happen without me noticing it, I put black tennis (grip) tape over it. It would be a shame to loose memory sticks because of this.But except for this, this is an absolutely brilliant camera for the advanced photographer. I would not recommend this camera for a pure DSLR beginner, it's too complex but once you know what you are doing, this is a beauty!!

I picked up the body three days ago, as an upgrade to my D90 - I was particularly interested in the weather sealing, how it performed without an AA filter, and some of the goodies that filtered in from the prior model, like the dual SD slots.Coming from the D90, this is simply an astounding upgrade in terms of image rendition, range, light sensitivity, and performance... but it takes spending some quality time becoming familiar with it to truly appreciate it.If you are the sort of person - like me - who simply starts tweaking things in advance without really testing them, then you can easily make things difficult for yourself. Case in point: 51 AF points. Coming from the D90, where I had 11, this seemed to be a really good thing, and it CAN be, in the right scenario. However, if you blindly set it to use 3D tracking without considering your subject, the sheer density of the focus points combined with certain subjects can lead to a lot of focus-shifting back and forth. The solution to this is to either use pure auto focus (and I know you purists are shaking your head already at that one, I know I was at first), change the AF mode to AF-S, or use less focus points. I suspect if I had just left the focus as it shipped, I wouldn't have seen any issue at all.Much of what is new to me, like the custom modes, won't be new to somebody coming from the D7000, so I won't go into detail on those. It does feel that this has become the definitive DX camera to track action - sports and wildlife in particular, given the new crop mode (which is of no use to me) and the aggressive focus tracking. But there's plenty in there for other shooters as well, and the extra resolution and light sensitivity is never a bad thing.

I am a Nikon guy through and through. I progressed from D100 to D200, to D300 and finally to this camera which is the "D400" if such a thing existed. The stills are amazing. Incredibly low noise even at high ISO. Coupled with a sharp lens, this camera simply makes everything else before it obsolete. But I still cannot fathom why Nikon simply has no clue about professional video. If you are looking for a DSLR as a large sensor video camera for "cinematic look" video, DO NOT buy this camera. The quality of the video is simply not there. I cannot explain why. There is no explanation except the software because the sensor clearly has far more resolution than is required to make exceptional video, but this camera just doesn't do it. It's just soft and lousy looking when compared to virtually any other DSLR or even a cheap video camera. Cranking up the sharpening setting just makes it worse (it looks like soft video that has been sharpened). The 60i mode is so bad it's unusable. I'm extremely disappointed in this camera's video quality. In addition, the pre-amp on the mic input is really noisy, so there is a lot of hiss on interviews even when using premium lav mics. I give it 4 stars because it's an exceptional still camera and that's what most people will buy it for. But if you are a filmmaker looking for a DSLR cinema camera, buy a Canon. I hate to say it, but it's true. Come on Nikon, you can do so much better. Hire an engineer that knows something about video.

I'm just a noob, but a serious noob. I also own a D5100. I'm not going to go into details why I think it is an awesome DSLR because someone else probably already stated all those reasons. I didn't buy the D7100 hoping for better image quality vs the D5100. Both have similiar image quality and impossible to tell apart. Some said, the D7100's high ISO performance isn't that great vs the D5100. It's actually slightly better, but not by much according to my tests. Keep in mind you're viewing a 24mp vs 16mp too.Tested the D610 before making my choice to go with the D7100. The D610 isn't a bad camera, but can't stand all the focus points cluttered into a tight space. The D7100 also seem to focus faster too with the same lens (50mm F/1.8). If i were to go full frame, i would skip directly to the D800's. Personally I think the D7100 is better than the D610 and D700. I do mostly daylight photography, so paying extra $$$ for low light performance isn't worth it and it's not like the D7100 sucks in low light anyway. I get usable/good pictures up to ISO 3200.Only a few thing I don't quite like about this DSLR.****The ISO button cannot be programmed to another button. when using a light lens, it's not so bad, but when using a heavy lens like the 70-200 F/2.8, it's tough.EDIT: 4/9/14 After 1000 shots, about 20-30 small spots appeared across the whole frame at F22. I almost never shoot pass F8 (portrait photographer only), but this sort of bothers me. My D5100 doesn't have this problem after 6000 shots. Please comment if you have this problem too.

I have owned the camera for about 7 months now. It is a phenomenal DSLR! I have worked my way up through the Nikon 3100, 5100, and now I am absolutely loving the D7100. The thing is packed with features that are extremely useful and make for a perfect introduction to professional-level ideas and concepts, such as the built-in intervalometer to make time-lapse really easy. Its essentially a pro-featured camera which I love, but still includes a few simpler options for my wife who prefers point-and-shoot simplicity. I had been upgrading every two years, but will be keep this model for quite a bit longer. The reviews online are predominantly very positive, with the D7100's small buffer being the only real negative mark. It can slow the # of frames taken in a certain amount of time, but it is only a problem for a small subset of scenarios (shooting full-size RAW @ 6 frames per second, for example). A high-speed memory card and a few quick settings adjustments and you can get past that problem pretty easily, with negligble effect on image quality. i highly recommend this DSLR...