Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon Coolpix W300
394 отзывов пользователей o Nikon Coolpix W300
Пользовались 
          Nikon Coolpix W300?
          
            Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
          
The menus are terrible to navigate. I can't find the setting I'm looking for without spending minutes trying to navigate the menus. It gives different menus based on what "mode" the camera is in and it's a pita to try and change "modes" to get what your looking for. They have some horribly stupid menu system for part of it where you tilt the camera to move the selection cursor. Well it doesn't work. It doesn't recognize you have tilted the camera most of the time or it's so slow to change you tilt it a again and it now moves past what you were trying to select.
On the plus side the battery life is excellent on it. I haven't had any issues with the wifi or Bluetooth but I honestly have hardly used either.
Can't speak to the waterproofing. I never intended to take it underwater in any case. I just wanted it to survive rain but I haven't had it in the rain either. It's been such junk I don't bother taking it out with me any more.
I'll be looking for another small camera soon to replace this one. Shame I really like all my other Nikon cameras and lenses.
This camera is waterproof to 100 feet (30 meters) and shock-proof from a height 8 feet. I have tested it under water, taking pictures in tide pools and filming in a rushing river. I’m impressed with the video quality, in and out of the water. It shoots in 4k and the video looks amazing, but the photos look awesome too.
Scene modes - Portrait, beach, close-up, action, indoor, sunset, dusk/dawn, night landscape and more. These modes automatically adjust the camera settings for you, which makes it easier for a novice like me. I’ve played around with the different modes to see how they affect the picture. You can really see the difference when you are shooting a sunset or sunrise. The different modes will affect the colors of the shot. It does take a little bit of extra time to pick the mode you want to use for the shot, which can be a challenge if you need to take a picture quickly.
If it is a little too bright or too dark for my shot, there is an easy way to adjust the brightness before you take the photo. There is a button on the camera to click up or down for the picture brightness. It will show the change on the screen before you take the shot. (This option is not available when shooting video.) There is also a button on the side of the camera to turn a front light on while shooting. It is different from the flash and stays on until you turn it off by repressing the button. It will only help with close-up shots though. The light doesn’t project very far from the camera. (This option is available for video.) The Nikon Coolpix W300 has a maximum photo resolution of 4608 x 3456; plenty big enough to be able to crop and edit photos, if needed.
I’ve been using it for about four months now and I’ve taken some great videos and photos with this camera.
Both of the photos on this review were taken with the Nikon Coolpix W300.
So as to the Nikon Coolpix W300, I haven't put it through all its paces yet, as I've had it only two months, but here's the skinny so far.
Pros:
-- The images look sharpe, auto-focus seems accurate and the colors appear reasonable and accurate for land-based snapshots at least. I haven't dropped it or taken it into cold temperatures, nor has it been underwater yet.
-- The functionality - scene selection modes and other flash/no flash options seem to be present as they were with the Canon and appear to work effectively.
Cons:
-- I miss the four point, user choice for strap location that the Canon had.
-- I greatly miss being able to open the compartment, remove the battery and charge it outside of the camera with the compartment closed. All these so-called waterproof cameras will go bad quickly if even the slightest tweak is done to the water-tight door, so having the door open while it sits on a table with a cord attached to the camera and power source is asking for an accident, it seems to me.
-- Maybe I'm just getting used to the switches and functions, but the Nikon seems somewhat less intuitive to operate than the Canon was but, since the Canon is no longer available and I'm a life-long Nikon man, I may grow to love it once I've internalized the new routines.
In the end, I'd rather use my land-based Nikons than either tough camera, so the real test of usefulness of the W300 will be when I take it under water. But frankly, I'm not going to tempt fate until I actually have a need. As time goes along and I make more use of the camera, I will try to update this review.
Now to say a few unflattering words.
The instructions that come with this camera are in two very thick books which somehow manage to contain absolutely no information of any value at all. The "action" button on the side of the camera that is suppose to support "shaking" the camera to cause it to display different photos is a complete waste of functionality. The old version of this camera provided some really cool GPS functions, but I guess too many people thought it was a real GPS and perhaps got lost using it. The W300 will record GPS locations and it does sync up with the GPS systems which is "kind of" nice for being able to recall where you took a photo, but I haven't yet found it all that useful. The lat/long information does not show up in "Photos" nor on the Snapbridge App, nor in the camera.
More importantly though is that one of the major selling features of this camera is that you are suppose to be able to set it up to wirelessly transfer your photos from the camera to a "smart device". That means you cannot transfer them to your computer but only to your phone. This requires that you download an application called "Snapbridge" to your phone. The camera comes with a manual that purports to describe how to use the "Snapbridge", but it provides conflicting instructions. Although the manual does discuss Wi-Fi connections, a Bluetooth connection must be established first. I had once set up Bluetooth one time after several hours of trying. Once it was finally set up, it appeared it would continue to work, but after a couple of weeks of not using my W300 it refused to automatically connect.
Well, it turns out that you need to first "forget this device" in the Bluetooth list of devices in settings on your iPhone, and then when you try to reestablish the connection you must SIMULTANEOUSLY select the camera on your iPhone -AND- press the OK button on the camera. This requirement is well hidden at the back of the snap bridge manual.
Now to download photos from my camera to my smart device, I have to "switch to wifi". This means your wifi can no longer be used to connect to the internet.
The photos on your camera will then be displayed. You have to individually select each one that you want to download. There is no "select all" option. {Note: "select all" is now available}
There is suppose to be a way to use an android emulator on your mac that will allow you to run Snap Bridge. I was able to install the NOX emulator and download the Snapbridge app, but it fails when it tries to turn on the Bluetooth (which was already on) and is stuck.
Again, I'm quite happy with the performance of the camera. It takes some very nice photos and the "scene selection" option even works well under water. When I would take a photo above the surface, it selected the right option and those photos also look good.
Finally, if you just cannot stand the use of Snapbridge you can always use the cable to download the photos directly to your camera.
Nikon also provides 15G of free disk space to back up your photos. Snapbridge can be used to upload the photos. I'm not sure this is a "good thing" or not.
Addendum: I took this camera to Portugal for 6 weeks. I want to remind you that I was very disappointed with the "WiFi" download. Well, the download worked perfectly for those 6 weeks. If i were to guess, I think it has something to do with the way Bluetooth works. I've noticed with other Bluetooth devices, if you manage to get a Bluetooth connection for the first 10 to 20 times (a WAG) that after that, Bluetooth becomes much more reliable at making a connection. After this trip, it is almost as if my camera is acting like a spurned lover trying to "reconnect". It takes seconds to get my phone to recognize the camera and set up the WiFi for download.
All I can say is, if you can perceiver through the initial "pairing" operations, once the camera figures out the phone it is suppose to be connected to, it will rapidly reconnect.
OTOH, I wonder what will happen if I get a new phone. No Good I'm sure.
OK, it is several months later. I have upgraded my phone to ios13.5.1. I had upgraded the camera firmware to 1.4 after the Portugal trip. I also upgraded to Snapbridge 2.7.0. All of these are the "latest". My phone and camera will not connect to one another. In the past, the Bluetooth connection was usually made. Now even that isn't working. I tried to forget the camera in bluetooth on my phone. I am extremely frustrated. Tried to call Nikon, but they have "unusually high call volumes so use 'chat'," after a 10 minute wait for a chat connection, I gave up. I've wasted 90 minutes trying to reconfigure this.
A "solution", is to:
-- forget this device in iPhone Bluetooth settings
-- forget this device in SnapBridge
-- Reset Default settings on your camera
-- try to re-pair starting from the beginning. (this worked for me)
The company did send a new replacement. Just didn't get any pictures from our Hawaii trip.
The Nikon COOLPIX W300 is simple to configure and operate. If you want point and click, then this is easily done with good results. You also have some manual control of settings and may want to view the on-line manual to see if it can do what you want. It’s small enough for a daily carry camera or if you don’t want to lug around an SLR. Based on specifications, features, reviews and research I believe I made the better choice for my needs. I mainly got it for 4K videos and does an impressive job at that; looks great on the 4K big screen while streaming from my NAS. Don’t cheat yourself and opt for the highest settings on video or pictures since storage is cheap. I used a 128GB V30 SDXC card that never missed a beat. You’ll get about 45 minutes worth of video at that resolution so you may want to get additional batteries based on your usage. I see approximately 32GB per hour of footage.
I tested the camera at home under water and didn’t see any issues with leaking. I’ve taken it on trips to pools, beaches and snorkeling with no leaking. Make sure you read the warnings on sealing the camera before water use and you shouldn’t have problems. The TG-5 has two compartments to seal and potentially leak where the W300 has one. For some reason I had an issue with temporary fogging on the LCD screen when parasailing which cleared up after landing. Contacted Nikon support and told to send in for repair but ended up exchanging for a new unit since I was still under my return window.
Those “action” cameras are too tiny to handle and not worth the trouble. The size of this camera is a good compromise and comfortably attaches to my mountain bike with a standard mount although the novelty of watching bumpy rides wears off quickly. It’s not that the image stabilization is an issue, just that being there is much better than watching it on any screen which can be nauseating to some.
Here are some early unaltered samples from this camera.
- - -
Had to decrease video resolution from 3840x2160 to 1920x1080 since amazon upload was destroying the quality.
- - -
Either the new uploaded video didn't replace the original or the quality of amazon's re-encoding is still killing the actual video quality.
Very disappointed with Amazon Nikon seller.
Over a week of skiing, I've found the Nikon to frequently have trouble obtaining focus (both in pictures and over the course of a short video), it doesn't do as good a job with auto-exposure or auto-white balance (even in the dedicated "snow" mode and in both sunny and overcast conditions) and worst of all, the battery exhausts itself early in the day, after very few pictures or video clips, presumably due to the cold (merely in the 20's F). All batteries suffer from exposure to cold, but I always keep my camera in my pocket and close to my body in such conditions and never had my old Panasonic declare its battery depleted part way through the day like this one did repeatedly.
I was excited about its stated 100 ft underwater depth rating and its 4K video and newer image sensor, but it's a failure at just handling a day out skiing in mildly cold weather. Unfortunately, it's become too late to return the camera via Amazon's return policy so I'm going to have to try to find somebody who's interested in this camera despite its shortcomings.
The photos attached are straight out of the camera. I have not applied any corrections, adjustments, or crops.
I'm disappointed. Images are not sharp and the colors don't seem properly balanced. Yellow and orange seem strong but greens and blues are weak.
After realizing it had leaked i initiated warranty repair with Nikon support who immediately blamed it on user error and would not repair the device with a $150 service fee plus return shipping after I had paid to ship it to them initially. I demanded a pressure test on the device which they had NOT done. Months later Nikon came back and indicated the camera passed the pressure test but provided no test results or paperwork supporting the claim and offered me 10% off and free shipping to repair. I asked for the paperwork on the test and received nothing and they just shipped me the camera back unrepaired yesterday 3/20.
dont get me wrong i love the shots from this camera but the quality and support are so poor i could never recommend it to anyone. After such poor treatment from Nikon on this issue on an expensive item I am making sure to let people know especially in the dive community to STAY AWAY
Look at the TG series or the new Sealife Micro out this summer
Camera doesn't know how to SD card. The thing beeped like a bomb. But there's an app so it'll be fine. It wasn't.
Camera can't hold a charge. I changed it for over a day, bust it out. "BATTERY EXHAUSTED"
I tried charging again. Green light appears. It's charging. Turn it on and "BATTERY EXHAUSTED"
I'd give it less than 1 star for the battery because that's ridiculous. I've played with dozens of cameras and this was new. Never had a problem like this.
Look elsewhere.
This waterproof P&S conceals a host of really interesting features. Like its little brother the W100, its a rugged camera that defies water [just follow the instructions, and don't take the toaster into the tub, OK?]
• I can pull serious b&w images by desaturating the color menu, adjust exposures via the +/- thumb wheel. For the tech-weenies out there the RGB pixel pile in photoshop showed all heaps as exactly the same.
• Color can be as lush or modulated as you want, like when shooting people under tree canopies and that green is doing things to their faces etc.
• Native image size is 14x11 at 300dpi. The Bluetooth upload to your camera is a half-size jpg ready for IG, FB or whatever web destination.
DISLIKES:
• Zoom tends to interpolate pixels. Stick w native wide angle.
• The SnapBridge software is a bit clumsy on install, don't rush it. Directions are cryptic. It took me several tries.
• Camera only came with a neck strap. This is the only time I've ever used a wrist-strap, and I found mine attached to a junk camera in a thrift shop for $3.
MEH: The usual clutter of post-effects. I ignore them. If I want a glaze, I'll get a donut. Facial recognition? didn't use it.
I was taking pictures with the W300 on a family vacation and noticed the images were grainy and just didn't look sharp. I was shooting out of the box and didn't mess with any "artistic" settings. I hated how it chose exposure based on my focus points (I did mess with different focus point styles) and I couldn't get the images to clear up no matter how I tried to expose the shot.
Long story short: Every shot I took was no where near as crisp as my phone camera. As an added bonus on a smart devise all you need to do is tap for a proper focus and exposure point.
The near $400 expense just isn't worth it for me. I already have a waterproof phone and if I need to dive deeper than a pool (which I do on occasion) a GoPro is significantly cheaper with significantly better image quality.
You would think that a camera company, producing a consumer grade camera would outperform a camera phone. The truth is, the W300 just doesn't compare. 3 stars because it's a solid unit but it is a camera after all and should at least produce good images...
I'm attaching an image as comparison. It was shot in bad lighting and I wasn't really trying to go for anything fancy. Just a shot of my kid fishing. I intentionally took a second shot with my iPhone after noticing the sharpness / ISO graininess issues. The image was edited at full resolution in Photoshop and exported at 72dpi.
PS: I'm not advising you swim with your iPhone. I'm just saying that in tests, it's fine for light weight water shots. Do so at your own risk.


 
            
           
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
            



 
                        