Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon Coolpix W300
394 отзывов пользователей o Nikon Coolpix W300
Пользовались
Nikon Coolpix W300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор




у МЕНЯ НЕ было КАМЕРЫ.













It takes good pics & videos but it keeps fogging all the time ..it fogs underwater, it fogs in sunlight, it fogs everywhere within a short time of use...unless there is fix for this fogging( condensation on the lens & sometimes on the screen too) there is no point in buying this cam..2 stars only for the few pics it takes before fogging u..otherwise zero stars....
Highly disappointed...hope nikkon has a fix for this problem at the earliest
Anyone know how to stop this fogging issues in the lens & screen, kindly let me know
Thanks

Red colour doesn't show up below 10 mts- Use The SCENE mode for reliable colours- Other modes give you greenish hue
The click button on top is fiddly & does not activate immediately _ My friends works fine - His battery lasts much longer at dives than mine - But otherwise nothing to complain
Small tip Use video mode reliably as focussing underwater on moving fish is tough - Inanimate and still corals can be clicked beautifully
Couldn't find the mode for multiple pictures tho was activated - That would have been a big help
Used it for 7 days & about a 1000 photos




On paper, no the W300 is not significantly better than the AW130. No improved sensor size, no improved zoom, and while it has 4k, no 4k 60P.
However there are a lot of hidden under-the-hood improvements that make this a significantly better camera than the AW130/AW120 (which are almost identical).
The image and video stabilization is significantly better. They also fixed a lot of white balance and dynamic range issues. The old AW series used to take a lot of work with exposure compensation and metering to get images that weren't over or under exposed...but the new W300 consistently does a much better job with this. This is especially noticeable shooting landscapes in overcast conditions. Nikon added D-lighting to this camera as well which really helps too.
Another nice plus was that they dialed down the noise blurring somewhat. Many of the old AW cameras would to fix noise, aggressively blur the image and then sharpen it, giving it a "water color" look. This was disastrous for some photos...for example shooting trees resulted in most of the leaves being smudged together giving you an "abstract painting". This is much improved now.
The screen is much improved which in some ways is minor, but it really does help with exposure compensation and seeing if your shot turned out.
On the downside, it is a much heavier camera than the previous AW's and they axed the map feature which I was really disappointed in.
Whether this is a worthy competitor to the Olympus TG-5 is a good question. I suspect the TG-5 does a better job of shooting low-light photos, making underwater videos and doing macro shots. While the W300 is likely a better camera for above-water video (mostly for its better stabilization), better average picture quality, and is more affordable.

