Отзывы о Мфу Epson L1800

I bought the Epson R2000 because it was rated one of the best photo printers.It is the worst. The pictures after a few are printed start getting line through the photo. I phoned customer service and they said I was using the wrong paper and they were a bit rude. I also ran the test page and cleaned it. Still not good. So I changed to the Epon photo paper and it still prints with lines through the picture after a while. I was stiffed on my rebate of $100.00 also! This printer was over $600.00!!! I will never buy an Epson again!!!! It makes a great table top.

I just installed the R2000 on my 2nd computer with the wifi set up and it works good so far. It nice to be able to print without hooking up the USB cable. I din't follow the directions at first and it stop in the middle some place. Then I followed the directions (that is - don't plug in the USB cable until you are told to) and it was installed in about 10 minutes or so.I print mostly "people" using the Epson icc profiles in Photoshop and the printer prints beautifully just like the R1900 I had. Super quiet. I wonder sometimes if it is even printing. The bigger ink cartridges are nice too.If you are wondering if this is good enough for you - I rest assure you that you will love the output from this printer. The gloss adds a nice clear coat to make the glossy photos something special. See if you can catch it on sale and save $100 or so.

The print quality is excellent. Loading media is a whole different game. I use Epson Satin Canvas cut to 8.5x11 rear loaded as instructed. There is no release mechanism to aid in loading and feeding limp canvas into the rear over the white feed wheels is very difficult. Surely this could be easily fixed with a simple spring and release lever. Also, I find that sometimes when it rejects the media as loaded, you can click eject and it works (about 50% of the time). Otherwise, when it rejects loading to print, it is a real hassle to get it working right.

I absolutely love the prints I get from this printer. I print both photos and graphic designs and the colors are sharp, vibrant, rich, deep and beautiful. It really looks best with Epson papers. I was extremely happy for about 8 months but then the printer started having paper feed problems. Thankfully it was still under warranty and Epson sent me a new replacement printer, which so far is working excellent. I use this printer as part of my business. I print heavily (about 100-200 prints per week) so perhaps this printer is not meant for such heavy use. It might be better for less use. Overall, I would definitely recommend it for it's print quality. If you are planning to use it commercially or for heavy use, you may want to look for a more qualified printer. I am happy though.

Professional Graphic Designer (retired) and amateur photographer. I've had my Epson R2000 about 2 months and already I'm longing to have my old Epson 1280 back, with its 2-cartridge system (compared to 8 cartridges with the 2000). While print quality and color usage with the R2000 seem reasonable, the printer drinks "Gloss Optimizer" at the rate of 4 or 5 cartridges to 1 color cartridge. As I prefer to print on matte paper, why do I need gloss optimizer and why does it use so much? Is there a way to bypass gloss optimizer? Bob D

This gargantuan printer prints incredible photos. There are endless color adjustments possible and the prints are sharp and clear. I find the Adobe RGB setting to be most realistic color for fleshtones. The downside for me, and the reason I have to return this printer, is that although the printer is wireless and is supposed to be one of the printers that is Epson iprint enabled, the ONLY things that I was able to print through the iprint app were JPEGs. The app brings up choices of photos, docs, cloud storage, etc. as selections for printing, but each and every file type except JPEG produces an "unsupported file type" error. The printer is also not (yet) compatible with Epson's email printing. To be clear, I was able to print all the file types I needed from my home computer/laptop. But much of what I want to print, I want to be able to do remotely from an android device.I contacted Epson about the JPEG only issue, as the types of projects I would be printing would include files other than JPEG and I regularly use andoid devices for at least parts of my projects. Epson's response was as follows: "At this time, the JPEG file type is all that is supported. They are always updating this so it will most likely have more support in the future." I wish they could have given me something more concrete - what additional remote printing options will be available and in what time frame. So I have to reluctantly return this printer, but will keep an eye on it to possibly purchase again in the future when updates to connectivity have been made.

Contrary to some reviews the ink consumption is not bad at all. I have printed a 13" x 8ft panaroma, a 8.3" x 15ft panaroma and over 30 8.5 x 11 prints on the first set of ink cartridges. I did have to replace the gloss cartridge, but that is a small price to pay for the outstanding quality. The color,IQ and clarity is amazing. Everyone thinks I had prints made it is so good. There was no drying out even after a 2 week trip to China. I highly recommend this printer. For the price is is a bargain considering what you get.

I received my printer yesterday and have spent the last 14 hours trying to get it set up and running. The instructions are incomplete and inadequate. I still have not got it right. I saw no information in the instructions regarding how changing black ink cartridges will alter the icc paper profiles available so I spent 4 your trying to figure what happened to my glossy paper choices. I now think I have it operating but at about 20% capability. I would not suggest anyone purchase this or any other epson printer if you are running an IMAC.

When the 2880 works it makes great photos. It rarely works. The sheet feeder works about 1 in 20 attempts (more often not at all). Once in a while an unplug reboot works to get me one or two prints (before again refusing to feed). I'm just waiting to use the hundreds of dollars of ink I have before getting replacing the printer. Not only would I not recommend to a friend I would give to an enemy. Hint: To change black inks you have to un-install and re-install the printer.

As a composer I use the printer primarily to make enlarged copies of complex music scores.It took a while until I found the correct paper to use , but once I did I found that it was perfect.I also use it quite often to print unique labels right on to my CD's jand it is excellent for that purpose and quite easy to use. the ink does tend to be a bit pricey, however if you use the Epson inks they're quite good.I highly recommend this printer.

This printer is a terrific. I have been taking college courses in photography. Other students ask me "where did you have that printed" I say "at home". Then they say " I wish I had a printer like that".The printer is easy to use. I do a fair amount of black and white printing the three shades of black helps to get better black and white prints.Color prints are also very good quality. It is best to use Epson paper.

Excellent printer for someone just beginning to print large format photos. Good and true color reproduction. Accepts most papers but is difficult to adjust to some sizes, takes persistence to determine just how to fit a digital photo to some paper sizes. Reasonable ink conservation depending on type of paper used. You learn a lot from this before stepping up in printer quality if you are doing art studio work.

I was quite disappointed with this printer. It is slow, for one thing, and rather complicated in terms of the manipulation of its capabilities. The most egregious condition is with the inks. When one of the cartridges runs out, the printer will not print, so you must get a whole new set. The expense of this is unacceptable.I had this printer for 4-5 months, then sold it for less than half of its original cost.

I have used Canon and HP printers in the past. They were in the $ 200 - $ 350 range. At this time I have been able to devote much more of my time to photography. So I tried the Epson R2000, money well spent. When I print a photo now it looks just like the one that I took with my camera. There is a learning curve with this printer which I lived through and was worth it. I paid a little more but I'm happy with the qaulity of the finished product. At this time I use Epson paper which I like very much and has a good selection.

I am a photographer and have been using Epson printers from the beginning.My last printers were the 3800 and also the 280. Unfortunately they were ruined in the hurricane. I bought the 2880 to replace them. I am super happywith my new printer. Vivid colors and easy to use. I also have an older 2200 which is now used by my husband.Highly recommend the 2880 and other Epson products.

I've had my Epson R2000 for about 2 months now and I really love it. Setting up the printer was a breeze and I'm not the best with this type of thing. But I set it up myself without any problems.This is the first photo printer I've owned (that isn't an all-in-one) and I'm really enjoying printing with it. I'm learning about ICC profiles, color management and this printer makes it all very easy to use.Except for a few prints that did not come out well (could be my settings, not sure yet) every thing else came out very nice- color prints as well as black and white.I also don't fully agree with the comments about the ink usage. I've only had to replace 2 cartridges so far and I've printed over 50 8.5x11 prints, as well as a few 13x19. This doesn't seem too bad to me.Overall I'm very happy with this printer.

Pros:Excellent print quality, reasonably fast.Cons:Single sheet feed failed after three prints, small tank capacity and high ink consumption on high quality setting means frequent purchase of cartriges.I can live without the single sheet feed, but it's failure is disappointing. This is an expensive printer and quality control should be better.

I needed a printer that would print paper smaller than 8x10. I shopped around and found this one that, with a rebate, was less than most of the smaller printers, and not be expensive to fill with ink, although I don't think it is as economical as my 3880. The prints it makes, and I have tried it to 13x19 are just as good as the 3880.

I have been using the Epson Photo Stylus 2880 for over three years. I took my a while to figure out how to print high quality photographs but once I did I have been impressed with the quality. The large format is a very nice feature. My only complain is having to switch from Matte Black to Photo Black to print pictures. WCS

After years of using my Epson Stylus Photo 1800 I felt it was time for me to upgrade to newer printer technology and better color prints. After much research and many conversations with more talented photographers I decided the Epson Stylus Photo R2000 was the printer for me. My photographer friends all said, and I quote, "It's the best printer I've ever had". With the new profiles and inks they all said they get perfect color prints right out of the box. I've only had my R2000 for a week or so, but I have printing many prints for Christmas gifts. So far,it has performed as recommended by my friends. If you want good color prints, the Epson R2000 is the printer to consider.

I love this printer for how it prints BW's but the ink is sooooooooo expensive!! If I'd known that I would NOT have purchased it. Seriously!! Inkjet printers are getting way too expensive to use. I had the Epson 2200 before the 2880 and I couldn't believe how much smaller the inks are. But it does make a beautiful print.

I purchased this printer in February of this year, after reading a glowing review in Pop Photography Magazine. The price was steep at $500. but with the promised $100. rebate, that brought it down to an affordable amount for my limited retirement budget. I figured I could swing $400. for it. And it seemed like a very good printer to boot. After receiving the printer, I filled out all the neccessary paper work with proof of purchase and carefully mailed it to them. To date, I never received a rebate and there is no number or web site to contact them at. I feel I have been cheated out of the promised $100. I will never buy an Ebson product again. I rated the product only one star because the price was part of the deal and I probably would have purchased another cheaper brand except for the rebate. If you plan on purchasing this printer, keep in mind you may be paying full price and may never get your promised rebate. As for the quality of the prints, A cheaper brand would probably do as well. Pfuuut!.........Aug.7 update! Still no rebate check sent to me. I wrote a formal letter to their headquarters explaining my issue, two months ago and received NO response. Customer service is zero. I don't think this printer is worth $500. I should have bought a $99. Lexmark printer from HSN. I think I would have gotten a better deal.

The Epson Stylus Photo R2000 works flawlessly, putting out high quality color and B&W prints. I have made many color and B&W prints, every size from 4X6 to 10X44 inches without so much as a hick-up! I would recommend it to anyone wanting an economical reliable printer for excellent print output.

This is a great printer for me and my ability...the next one up (R3000)was a bit out of my price range. Easy to setup and use...great colors on all types/styles/manufactures of paper. Haven't tried a roll of paper yet, but I am sure that I will be more than satisfied.