Отзывы о Мфу Epson L1800
Где купить Мфу Epson L1800
 | Epson Струйный принтер EPSON L11058, черный, оригинальная упаковка с оригинальными чернилами. | Яндекс Маркет | 74 985 ₽ | Посмотреть |
| Принтер струйный Epson L1800, цветн., A3, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 88 888 ₽ 159 999 ₽ | Посмотреть |
461 отзывов пользователей o Epson L1800
Пользовались
Epson L1800?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Синтрон-5EUXS
17.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was eager to see how the Epson Stylus Photo R2880 compared to my trusty old Epson Stylus Photo R800 Inkjet Printer which is still a great printer and was Epson's first true photo-quality printer. The first thing that I noticed was the R2880's size and design. When the doors are opened up for printing, the printer takes up considerable real estate, but when closed up it really doesn't seem that big. The build quality is top-notch and the styling is sleek and solid-looking.There are 2 USB ports on the rear of the printer which allow the connection of 2 computers at the same time. Not exactly a network-ready solution, but it works well for me. There's a PictBridge port on the front of the printer, but given the cost of the consumables for this type of printer, I can't really see anyone printing their photos directly from their camera without at least previewing them.Setup was very easy using the supplied software wizards. I took the time to allow the software to install the proper drivers, and the printer was ready to roll (after installing the ink cartridges too). I noticed that the size of the cartridges for the R2880 were actually a smaller capacity than my R800. This was a bit disappointing since the cartridges for the 2 printers are about the same price.My first color prints were absolutely stunning, right out of the box. I printed on both glossy and matte paper and was totally impressed with the quality which easily surpassed that of the R800. It's disappointing, however, that you have to swap out the Photo Black with the Matte Black cartridge when switching between Glossy and Matte paper. I printed B&W and Sepia photos using the Advanced BW printing mode and had great results each time.Overall, the Epson Stylus Photo R2880 has all of the features I need in a color photo inkjet printer and I would recommend it to anyone desiring a quality printer. There are some reviewers who have complained about the amount of ink that this printer uses, but if you look at the reviews here on Amazon for comparable printers from HP and Canon, you'll find that there are an equal amount of complaints about their ink usage too. The bottom line here is that you are paying for the ability to manipulate and control the output of your photos. There are many cheaper ways to have your photos printed, but always with a sacrifice in color quality.Here's a summary of my review. The cons are really pretty minor issues that are vastly overshadowed by the pros, so I gave this printer 5 stars. It really is that good.PROS:Stunning color print qualityB&W and sepia printingFeatures/DesignCONS:Small cartridge sizePhoto/Matte Black cartridge swapping
Астрон-9UIBB
19.09.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
In order to keep the inks from drying up, you need to use this printer at least once a week. I've had to perform all types of maintenance on the printer to keep it going, and sometimes I think that, despite the excellent quality of the prints, it might be worth the hassle, the timesuckage, and the per page expense of using the printer at school rather than having it conveniently at home, all to myself, (theoretically) at a less expensive price.
НаноРейдер-3PUBL
13.09.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Working with this printer is a purgatorial experience and feels something like one of the levels of torment in Hell from Dante's Inferno.The printer will fail you, and after it does, dealing with Epson customer support is like trying to negotiate with the SS.Please, whatever you do, PLEASE DO NOT buy this printer. Stop now, turn back. This way lieth destruction.I would rather eat my hands than buy another Epson.
Гравитон-1ELXN
21.08.2008
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I ordered my Epson R2880 about a month ago from Amazon, as a replacement for my trusty old Epson 2000P which was about seven years old. My new printer arrived very promptly a few days later. The Vista software installation went smoothly except for the fact that a couple of the amber "ink-empty" lights did not work properly, one never came on and one was flickering, like on and off. (These little lights are located in the ink well, they all (should) come "on" upon printer startup, then go "off", one by one, as each ink cartridge is inserted into the well.) The first couple of prints I made were not good, but I soon discovered that with this printer use only Epson paper and be sure to select the particular type of paper on the screen before commencing printing. I then printed several color and B/W sample prints, examined them under a loupe, and I must say they were great. I was impressed with the quality.Everything seems to run smoothly for the first week or so, although I noticed that the printer had a tendency to perform prolonged nozzle cleaning sessions. One session lasted between 6 and 7 minutes. That's when I started to look at the ink levels charts. This printer is really using the ink I thought. I then noticed large random dots, about 3mm in diameter on some of my prints, sometimes only an hour after a new start-up nozzle cleaning session. My last printing endeavor on this printer - just following a nozzle cleaning session - were eight 4x4" images where these dots showed up on five prints, some were in the margins and some right on the image itself.Calling Epson was quite an experience. The person told me to simply do a nozzle clean. I told him I had just done nozzle cleans, but he insisted and I did it. The first print out had the famous 3mm dots on the paper and the print. Do the nozzle clean again, he said. At this point I confronted him with the question of how much ink a nozzle clean required because my ink indicators showed a decrease in ink level of about 15% with each cleaning. He had no answer to that, or to any of my other questions, including the amber light question.I was now out of ink and had a lot of unwanted dots on many of the prints I had made. At this point I knew I would never feel comfortable using a set of inks priced at about $125. and only wind up with a handful of usable images. I returned the printer as I was still within the 30 days grace period.One last observation: It appears to me, after reading other reviews, that the ink/nozzle picotechnology is perhaps behind the curve of where it ought to be. In the quest for smaller and smaller picoliter dots, perhaps a different nozzle cleaning technology is required. At least, upscale future printers like this R2880 should have the ability to just clean one (1) color nozzle at a time, as user required, instead of necessarily cleaning all eight colors at a cost I figure to be about $18. to $20. per cleaning session.Tage Blytmann
Астероид-6ADPM
08.08.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've been making due with an older Epson Photo EX...can't believe how much the technology has improved since then. The printer is easy to operate, and colors are nothing short of amazing...fine, detailed prints like nothing I've ever been able to produce.Drawbacks are probably what others mention...the matte black/photo black swapping thing is just silly, the ink cartridges are too small, at highest quality settings the printer's a bit slow, no built-in network interface, and the printer's physically a little on the large size.Still, for me it's all about the final image quality - and nothing I've seen tops the Epson in this regard.UPDATE:Okay, so I've been living with my R2880 for about sixteen months now, and I wanted to refute some of the claims other reviewers have made. Perhaps I'm just one of the lucky ones, but my experience with the R2880 has been nothing short of fantastic.I've printed well over 2000 prints and gone through dozens of ink cartridges by now, and I'm happy to say that I haven't experienced EVEN A SINGLE JAM, MIS-FEED or other operational problem. I tend to use Epson's Ultra-Premium Luster for 8x10 size prints, Epson Velvet or Exhibition Fiber in 13x19 - and a few non-Epson brands including Museo, Ilford Silk and a few others. I've done a bit with canvas (both sheets and roll), though that's relatively rare for me. The short story is that everything I've tried has worked properly. Overall, I couldn't be happier with my printer.I do use my printer fairly regularly - always at least once or twice a week, usually more. As of now, except for the cycle when I install a new ink cartridge or initially power it on, I've never seen it waste ink on a cleaning cycle, nor have I ever had to manually trigger cleaning. My volume is high enough that I deal with the ink-swapping sillyness by simply waiting until I have enough material that I can use an entire print cartridge (about 50 prints, generally). I make the switch, print till I run out of matte ink, and then I switch back. This works for me, and doesn't waste any ink.My initial comment regarding the ink cartridges being too small is probably my number one gripe. Because the various color inks are used at different rates according to the tones in your photographs, it's not like you stop every so often and replace all the ink. You print, replace one color, print some more, replace the next one, and so on. I just find this slows me down unacceptably, and I'd like the option to have maybe 3-5 times more ink per cartridge.Print quality continues to be amazing...the only other printer I've seen that beats it is Epson's newer 7900 - a much larger printer that costs five times what the R2880 sells for. Yes, I'm a perfectionist with top quality gear, all the best software, calibration equipment, and I spend a lot of time fine tuning everything to get the best possible image quality. But I feel I've been rewarded for this work, and everyone who sees my prints comments as to the quality.
Интеллектор-4QHGN
04.11.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've had my R2880 for about six months now and have put it through its paces. I can't say enough about this printer. The print quality is outstanding...far better than any commercial print I've ever purchased. And that's not just color. B&W is fantastic...deep, rich blacks all the way through the gamut. The fact that I can now produce large (up to 13 x 19, though I generally stay with A3, or 12 x 16, paper) versions of my photographs with such startling results has me in a printing, matting, and framing frenzy!Admittedly, the ink is expensive. Each set of 8 cartridges runs about $110, but I consider it very worthwhile. Additionally, the Epson software (I'm using it with a Macintosh) makes it spectacularly easy to order new cartridges from Epson. If you order more than three colors, Epson ships them overnight or two day for free! The only problem I've had with the R2880 is trying to print on Epson's Velvet Fine Art Paper. The few prints I tried on it bled. I haven't tried to troubleshoot this with Epson, as I've fallen in love with their Ultra Premium Photo Paper Luster and do nearly all of my printing on that paper.I can't recommend this printer too highly. I've you're a serious photographer, you need this printer. I haven't used one, but I'd imagine the R3880, which is even larger format, prints similarly but for about $400 more. 13 x 19 is plenty large enough for me right now.
Вояджер-3LJGZ
10.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have been looking for an inkjet printer that could make both color and black and white prints that would showcase my panoramic photography. The Epson Stylus 2880 was an incredible find for me. It is very reasonable and its K3 inks are archival. I had my doubts that a printer under a thousand dollars could produce the kind of prints I was used to. I was surprised and extremely pleased with the results. For a panoramic photographer the 13inch wide format was perfect. I could make my prints at home up to 47" allowing me to produce museum quality prints without going to high-end labs. I have shot with the Linhoff Technorama and Fuji G617 for decades. Printing in the wet lab on Oriental Seagull with filtration on a cold light had been my hallmark for many years. When I made the transition to digital printing it took me quite a while to adjust to the new format. However I have found that good scans (I use an Epson V750 pro which allows me to use oil scans which I find superior and cleaner in terms of dust and flatness) I was able to produce very large prints at a fraction of the cost and with impeccable consistent results. In truth getting the first print is always harder than working with chemistry but the subsequent prints are almost effortless. I tried the Epson first with the glossy prints and after calibrating my monitor and making sure my paper profiles were correct, I made my first print and was stunned by the results. It was every bit as good as the 9880 which I had just used at a lab but I was not expecting such good results. The printer was easy to set up and use. The prints looked professional. Next I tackled my B&W panoramas on the roll paper. I used Epson ultra smooth matte and after using the correct profile printed a stunning 13x38 panorama on my first try. I admit cutting the print required care but the final result was truly superb. I would recommend and even urge panoramic photographers to use this printer as you will be very happy with the results and it will save you a ton of money. Finally a printer with archival inks and a roll feeder at a reasonable price that is easy to use and delivers great results has arrived. In addition those digital photographers who do panoramic stitching should seriously consider this printer as the 13 wide format allows you to print images up to 13x47 in an archival print. It's been a long time coming but the wait was worth it. My compliments and kudos to the engineers at Epson who remembered the artists who do panoramic prints.
Гравитон-0AVMJ
08.12.2009
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I had an Epson 2200. I loved it. I upgraded to this. I hate it in every way.You have to swap out the ink from matte to glossy if you change paper types. It insists you do. There is no way around it (There was on the 2200). This means that every time I print on a DVD, I have to switch the ink. To do so, the printer primes itself and literally takes 7-10% of the ink to do it. Then to switch it back there goes another 7%. I have gone through so much ink I can hardly stand to look at it.Sorry Epson, but the jig is up. This swapping ink system is a scam.Just for kicks, here is the final straw that triggered this review:I had just printed a glossy b&W print. Then I needed to print a CD so I switched out the photo-black to the matte-black like a little monkey. As the printer primed the inks, it literally ran itself out the last 10% of both magenta and light cyan. Now I can't print. I have to go to the store and buy more colored ink. Of course this is NUTS since I was only doing black and white prints.Yuck.
Пульсар-6TSQH
12.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is the first time I have ever felt compelled to write a review and postit online. I just received my Epson R2880 and I cannot say enough goodthings about it.The set up was a breeze! I followed the directions in the quick startguide, installed the drivers from the CD enclosed with the printer and wentto Epson's site to get the latest ICC profiles.Within thirty minutes I had my first print in hand. WOW! Simplyoutstanding! Epson?s claim that the R2880 provides "Exhibition QualityPrints" is spot on in my book.The funny thing is, I have a brand new color printer, and the first print Imade was black and white. It brought me back to being a kid in thedarkroom, when I made my first black and white print. (The ones that havehad the experience of seeing a print come to life in developer for the firsttime, know what I?m talking about). Well, it was just like that experiencewith my new Epson R2880.The bad thing about that, is now I want to run out and buy a scanner for allthose black and white negatives that I have tucked away in the archive. Mostlikely an Epson V750.The other thing I like about this printer is the ability to use the rollpaper attachment that came in the box with the printer. I installed it justafter pulling the printer out of the box. Now, I can print either a 13" x44" or 8.5" x 44" for either panoramic or gang printing. In addition, youhave the option to print 13" x 19" on 1.3mm thick media and Canvas. Icannot wait to play with that.What about color prints? Thanks for asking.The palette of colors seems to be real broad. The skin tones seem to bespot on and the bright colorful images simply popped! Hey, after all youhave 8 cartridges of Epson?s UltraChrome K3 ink going to that media.That brings me to the ink issue you might have read about in other reviews.All I can say is you get what you pay for! The Epson R2880 is worth it forthe results you will have for a lifetime.The foot print is not small, but you sure do get a lot packed in to its24.3" (W) x 31.4" (D) x 16.3" (H) size.I am hooked on this Epson R2880 printer. So much so, I signed up for anupcoming Epson Print Academy to get that much more out of my Epson R2880.Just go get one and you will see what I mean.Enjoy the prints of a lifetime!
Пандорец-3CASR
24.11.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I ordered the 2880 when my Epson 1800 started sending out "End of Life" messages. (The "End of Life" messages meant I needed new ink pads, which I had installed for under $100-and the 1800 is like new again. I now use it just for experimental photography on non-photography and hand cast paper that I apply digital ground to).I re-printed a couple images that I had already printed on my 1800, and noticed an improved red, and all over saturation improvement. I'm an artist who also does photography, experimental printing, and who uses photo-references for hyper-realist work. I need color accuracy, and got it instantly by using the printer's optional Adobe RGB setting with Photoshop. This machine plus a kick ass Canon SLR camera are able to do anything I demand. I've only had the machine for less than a month, and am pleased. I just need to find out if anyone locally stocks the ink jet cartriges. I know I can order them from Epson direct/no shipping charge, though.
Сатурниан-7CYGE
07.05.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Good Luck to everyone foolish enough to purchase an EPSON printer product.Support at best is dismal. Problems and build is frustrating and dismal at best.Why can't Epson finally get it? My Epson printers including the 2200 were nothing but a complete waste of money!!As of this date and on, I will avoid Epson printers with resolve!!!
Синтрон-6PXBU
10.11.2009
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
After the ease of delivery and set-up and the much anticipated use of this "amazing" professional photo printer my husband and I were terribly disappointed. We have a $100 canon printer that prints no better than this printer. The quality was not at all what we had hoped with the price of this printer. Yes, it can print poster size and yes it can print on cds...all very cool, but the foundational point---quality of printing pictures---was absent. The prints, no matter the size, were flat and obviously printed from a home computer. I even purchased high quality printing paper.It wasn't fast, if that's important to you and it's just a giant printer in our house now we will probably rarely use. Again, the fact that it's versatile in size printing is neat, but I would be using it mainly for 4x6-8x10 printing and printing on cds.
Сатурниан-4YXSP
18.12.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
ink jets have always been a cash cow for printer companiesthey often seem specifically designed to waste high priced ink cartridgesthis kind of engineering we do not need, but is what we get here, big timeearly in the era, about twenty years ago, third party companies would refill ink cartridges for prices under manufacturer's prices. Some religious communities kept afloat with this scheme.Epson has defeated this third party service now with this useless tank, which recognizes when its name brand cartridge is not in place. In fact it is so ethnically pure it sometimes refuses, inexplicably and without appeal even to customer service, to accept its own cartridges fresh out of the boxand then, when it does accept a set of its own high priced ink cartridges, it inexplicalby and without recourse wastes all of that ink on some obsessive-compulsive ink jet cleaning.this ink jet printer may look cute and may now and then put out a product, just often enough to torment you and keep you on the hook, but faggedaboudid, it ain't worth it, when you could be passing out 4x6's from your Canon SELPHY CP770 Compact Photo Printer (3058B001) in no time at all and to the delight of allbut we wouldn't want to make anyone happy with our photos, would we?forget the Epson unless you have endless patience and an endless account for ink cartridges. It's like getting a top supermodel as trophy wife, and then realizing the high maintenance.It's like getting the keys to a super Hummer and then charged all you got for a pint of fuel. over and over again.And then those large format photo sheets jam. Forget it. Have fun with your art instead of sacrficially appeasing an implacable and vengeful printer god. The purpose of art is peace, not feeding the endless Epson maw.but I do love mine and use it all of the time. great photo printeruse it for exhibitions etc.
Аэронавт-1VTDW
05.06.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Another great printer from Epson. ever since their first true photo printers came out around 2002, they have been industry leaders - particularly for the "prosumer" market (forgive me, I hate portmanteaus like that, but it fits). This printer is no exception and handles media from CDs up to 13x19" sheets. The color reproduction is pretty flawless and the ink use seems to be reasonable.Okay, now my wish list: First, Epson does not produce enhanced matte paper in a 13" roll, but the printer can handle roll paper(?!) what's up with this? The Enhanced Matte (now under the cumbersome moniker of "Ultra Premium Presentation Paper Matte") is their best stock for image reproduction. Second, and this is understandable, they do not make it easy to use second party ICC profiles thus expanding your range of usable paper stock. For a fine art photographic printer, this becomes very limiting. Finally, their printing software for printable CDs is a little basic. As a result you get little color control and so the quality (and no one should expect this really) isn't as good as on their paper. I should say, however, that it is adequate and I love this feature. I will be upgrading to a 7880 this fall and will miss that capacity.
Вектрон-3BKEV
10.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The Epson Stylus R2880 produces excellent prints. The archival quality is important to me, and the colors are brilliant. Most prints came out virtually the same as my monitor; every so often I have to tweak a file. I made no adjustments to get perfect black and white prints with no color casts; rich blacks and a nice tonal range. It prints beautiful portraits.If this will be your home computer, make sure you have a decent-sized place to set it up. It's very sleek looking and closes up to keep dust out. It's about 2 ft wide, but is compact for a printer that produces up to 13" x 19" prints.The set up was easy, and it's easy to use. Make sure you read all of the directions. It's sensitive to each kind of paper and where it's loaded. I'm working on Windows Vista. I just checked for the latest drivers. Also, it doesn't come with a printer cable, so purchase one separately if you don't have an extra.I use the printer for color proofing book and poster designs and making high-quality prints. To get the promise of quality, only Epson products should be used which means no bargain shopping. I like the Ultra Premium Photo Luster paper.Also the difference in using the quality versus max quality print settings is hardly noticeable if you want to save ink. However, I will always use max quality for my final product. I've only printed on 8 ? x 11 so far, but I'm looking forward to printing on roll and larger paper. I can't wait to try out some of the features such as printing images on my DVDs. It will make my home video productions look more professional to send to family.I would definitely recommend this printer to any serious amateur or professional dealing with images.Epson R2880 Large Format Photo Printer (C11CA16201)
НаноРейдер-9YLPL
31.12.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Prints look just like they came from my professional lab on lustre and glossy papers. Love.Please note other reviews inappropriately relate to the 3rd party provider not the ink itself. This ink is fabulous as works just as described by Epson.
Гиперион-9ZMNY
17.01.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Re: Epson Stylus Photo R2880 Printer.The Epson Stylus Photo R2880 printer is a sweet machine. From start up to printing the "quick start" guide was clear and concise with a step by step approach that did not leave this novice confused. Frankly, what has kept me from printing photos in the past has been a fear of technical language beyond my vocabulary. But the instructions given here left nothing to chance or misunderstanding. Loading the ink, the paper, connecting to my MacBook Pro and printing the first photos was easy and did not take a lot of time. From box to print took about 45 minutes and that was after checking everything twice.So far, color family photos, a couple of scenics and several black and white photos have gone through the machine with fantastic results. The color on the print very well matches what I see on the screen. And black and white photos come out even better. They are fantastic. After showing my wife the same photo in color and black and white, she preferred the black and white, but it was a hard choice for her to make.I am only beginning to explore the capabilities of this printer and I know that in the hands of someone more experienced this machine would put out awesome photographs. I would highly recommend the Epson Stylus R2880 to anyone who wishes to have more control over their printing. Its ease of use and quality photos will spoil even the most critical user.
ТехноНаблюдатель-3LCLU
28.06.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Long story short, the quality of this printer is simply stunning. (Am giving it four stars because the quality is literally amazing.)However, I wanted to use Moab canvas, and found out later the ICC profiles were not available for the R1900. I moved on to Epson paper with the Epson profiles and viola! perfect images.The buttons are less than intuitive, and the you have to be careful to cut rolls of paper perfectly straight or else canvas will not load. (Frustrating.) The thing sucks ink like crazy, but I suppose I print on it more than the normal person too. I use the printer for jobs where I need a print immediately. It costs more than my pro lab, but the quality is exceptional.All that said, would I buy the printer and go through all that again? Yes. The images are KILLER.
Аргонавт-7KQGF
20.01.2009
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
In my opinion, a large format printer is mostly for the large-format printing photographer who doesn't contract out for printing services. With all the printing services available, its hard to justify the cost of this printer. However, it can produce stunning photos of large sizes. It serves it purpose well, but its an expensive printer compounded by the costs of catridge replacment.Epson is touting its new Vivid Magenta and Vivid Light Magenta inks, which look to satisfy those who want heavily saturated prints. I like to oversaturate in Aperture for the extra punch, so this works for me. The dual-black (matte and photo) support is nice (but requires swapping) and this printer can print directly to CDs or DVDs.As always, ink is a major cost here. The cartridges are small for printing such a large format. Plus there seem to be alot of reports on the web about running out of ink really fast. The culprit seems to be because owners are leaving the printer on for exteneded periods of time. I had this problem on my Artisan 800, whose catridges lasted only about two weeks with minimal printing. I don't leave this one on.This printer produces stunning prints, but you must understand the costs (both up front and recurring) before you make a decision.
ОмниКод-1ETCW
26.07.2008
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this printer mainly because of additional feature of the CD/DVD direct printing, as my Epson R2400 does not have this capability. After completion of installation of the software, ink, etc., the printer went into what seemed like an extended cleaning mode. After printing one 7x5 image, the printed showed the photo black ink approximately one-quarter left. The rest of the ink levels had dropped to almost one-half level. Two days later, I turned on the printer and the printer seemed to kick into another cleaning cycle, and an extended one at that! After the printer was in the cleaning cycle for approximately four minutes, I noticed the printer icon bouncing in the dock at the bottom of the computer screen. When I opened the software, it showed me that the photo black ink was completely consumed and the printer wanted it replaced. I replaced the photo black ink and after approximately two more minutes of printer moving the head left and right, I was able to print. After printing a grand total of eight 7x5 images, the rest of the inks were totally out! At this point, I made arrangements to have the printer replaced. Well, I got the new printer and unfortunately, it has behaved the same as the first one. The only difference being that all of the inks went down almost even as opposed to the photo black ink going down first. After a total of two print sessions, all of the inks were consumed by the printer. For the whole set of inks, I managed to print ONLY TWO 2.5 inch x 1.4 inch size images! Actually, I had to replace the light light black ink along the way. I searched the internet and found no complaints with this device. I have no idea what is going on. All I can say is that this is not the case of user error as I have been using inkjet printers for a while (Canon S800, Epson 1270, Epson 2200, and Epson 2400).
НоваГость-0EDNU
19.08.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Fantastic quality for my demanding needs as a graphic designer and artist. I could not be happier with the print quality.The only issue with the 2880 is the same that plagued the 2200 it replaced. Feeding a stack of Epson Double Sided Matted Paper (S041568) always causes alignment problems, whether it is five or fifty sheets. I produce a double sided catalog and I have to feed each sheet individually or the pages will not line up front and back.Otherwise a wonderful purchase!
Странник-2OZHV
02.05.2009
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Do not buy direct from Epson. I bought the Epson R1900 for $[...] with a $[...] rebate. Two months passed, three months, four months... Finally I sent them a letter, "Where is my rebate?""You forgot to put the serial number in your application. But if you do it now and send the materials to us within 30 days, you'll get the rebate."I did that. Result: another letter."We cannot give you a rebate at this time. Refer to the terms and conditions on the mail-in form."20-20 hindsight: Why did they wait so long to warn me about the lack of the serial number on the application? To let the rebate period expire? You said it, I didn't.I find it amazing that a company of this size would antagonize its own customers and risk bad word of mouth, for the sake of $[...]. But that is what happened.Do not buy direct from Epson.
Интеллектор-8HCTG
17.04.2009
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
This product has been really disappointing. We have had it for over a year, and at the beginning it was great. Photos looked really nice, colors were bright, etc. But after just a few photos, it started to print really streaky pictures...so you run the auto headcleaning utility and waste a quarter of the ink just to clean the printheads. Then it works for a few more pictures and becomes streaky again. Additionally, if you are just printing something that isn't a photo, only the expensive paper will load. It gives an error message for any other thin stock paper. So basically, if you spend a lot of money on paper and ink, you will get nice photos some of the time, but you will end up wasting half of the expensive ink cleaning the printheads. I would not recommend that anyone buy this printer.
Лунатик-4LMLY
03.10.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have owned this printer for only a few days. In that time I have printed over 200 prints. I have printed both 8.5 by 11 and 13 by 19 inch prints without any difficulty. I have also replaced the ink cartridges without any problem. I have not had any contact with epson's tech support because I have not had any problems.Now for the printer itself. The build quality is solid. Setup was simple and I was printing prints within a few minutes of connecting the printer to my mac.I am using this printer in conjunction with a macintosh computer and photoshop elements. I tried other programs (iphoto) but elements gave me the truest reproduction of what I saw on my screen. This printer prints color accurately but it prints slightly darker than what you see on your screen. In other words the printer provides an accurate but dark copy of what you see on your screen when you print. The difference is slight but noticeable. Black and White printing is accurate and there is no color cast.The only caveat that I can offer is that the printer drinks ink. I have been printing a lot at best quality and I have gone through a number of ink cartridges. Vivid light magenta in particular disappears quickly. I am very happy with this printer after a few days of extensive use. If a problem crops up after a longer period of time I will amend my review. Otherwise I am marking this printer as a five star product and giving a wholehearted buy recommendation
Показаны отзывы 409-432 из 461.
