461 отзывов пользователей o Epson L1800

Пользовались Epson L1800?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Profile no image

Кронос-2AGRZ

25.03.2013

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

The printed copies, if they come out of the machine, look good, so IT PRINTS WELL WHEN IT PRINTS.I chose the printer because of its ability to print on 11x17 paper, which I occasionally do, and so I spent the extra money on it. I like that I can print all the way to the edge.Since owning the R2000 I have experienced many frustrating and really vexing difficulties to get it to print with a print command. It is extremely fickle at the paper feed, claiming "no paper" or "paper misfeed" when there is paper loaded in the machine. Other times it will sit there and grind away at some kind of self-test process that uses up the ink but produces no printed copy. Sometimes it clicks and grinds and I wonder if and when I will get a printed copy, and then it goes ahead and prints!Epson tech support staff during the last non-printing episode is not helpful and rather condescending. I told them that I wanted to print 6 copies of a sheet of postcards and that only one copy printed and nothing else could be coaxed out of the machine. They blamed the software program (Microsoft Publisher) and ignored the fact that the program was fine when the first sheet printed. Then of course they blamed the paper, even though I had printed similar jobs on the same paper before without a problem. To humor the tech staff I tried printing on their own Epson brand paper, without success. Same grinding noises, no result.My husband and I spent a good portion of a day trying to print 6 sheets of paper on the R2000 and finally succeeded by repeatedly rebooting the computer and the printer, which in the meantime had gone through 1/3 of a new ink cartridge while producing no printed copy. The third tech guy at Epson was kind enough to ship us a new ink cartridge for free.In summary, the R2000 is ill-equipped to handle anything other than light presentation paper or 24 lb bond. One should forget card stock. The baffling part of Epson's logic is that they make a printer that accommodates 11x17 sheets but Epson does not sell such paper. Yet the tech staff insists that if any product other than Epson paper is used, all bets (and warranty) are off. Now how is a consumer supposed to deal with that problem?I have kept the $ 430 printer because I can't afford to chuck it out and look for something else, but my experience is not endearing this equipment to me.
источник
Profile no image

НоваГость-4TUAF

31.05.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

First off, I want to say I'm primarily a photographer who in the past paid others to print out my photos. I always wanted to do my own printing but the start up costs and the steep learning curve kept me from attempting it. But then I read an article about the R2000 that made me curious whether or not this could be the printer for me. So I googled this reviews for this printer and couldn't for the life of me find any bad reviews, in fact, they all said about the same thing - excellent image reproductions along with the ease of not having to switch out the black cartridges. Then I see a rebate being offered by Epson for $100 off the top. This, coupled with free shipping and no tax, I couldn't resist and I pushed the little yellow Amazon button.The printer arrived one day later (I did the $3.99 overnight shipping. How they can ship a printer overnight for only $3.99 is beyond me). Worried the set up would be complicated I read everything I could about it. Turns out the set up was painfully simple. Just remove the multiple strips of blue tape, plug it in and add the ink. One thing the instructions failed to mention is once you add the ink cartridges and close the hood you have to press the little "ink" button, whereas the instructions would leave you to believe simply closing the hood would trigger the priming. Nevertheless, it took maybe 5 min at the most to be up and running. The installation software was equally simple and took approximately another 5 min to install and to connect to my wireless network. Crazy simple, I thought, all the while waiting for the "other shoe" to drop. Printing will be another story, I thought.Well, I couldn't be more wrong. Printing was as simple as setting the printer up. The key is to be sure you understand color management and use the right profiles for both printer and paper. It took a little experimentation but nothing drastic. And once I dialed in it all began to make sense. As long as you have the profile for the paper (which is pretty much the profile for the printer, too) and you either choose to let the printer handle color management or you do it in Photoshop/Lightroom and you're done. You may at first think your printouts are slightly darker than the monitor image would lead you to believe but generally they're not. Part of the issue is that you have to match the same viewing light on the print out as you are in the monitor and once I used stronger light (or the sunlight) the image was indeed perfect. Don't get me wrong, there were examples where the print out didn't match the monitor but it always turned out to be an operator error and one that was easily fixed. Just be sure to use quality paper and soon your walls will be filled with images that before only existed in cyberspace!To sum it all up, I highly recommend this printer to anyone looking to print high quality fine art images. You certainly can pay more for a printer with bigger numbers next to the words "Epson" but you really can't produce a better print out with that money (with the possible exception of specialized B%W printers, but that's another story altogether). Don't be worried that you'll waste ink trying to figure this one out because it really is as easy as they say it is.
источник
Profile no image

Сириус-3GGHA

10.09.2012

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I'm happy for all the people who write glowing reviews for this printer. My experience has not been the same. The frustration began when trying to set it up. I have a Mac with OS 7. It turns out that the instructions that came with the printer and that Epson has on their website don't work. I could not install the software via the updater the way they tell you. I wound up having to contact tech support by email. They responded the next day with a lengthy list of instructions to follow. I had to install the driver for 10.6 and then go through the updater for 10.7. Considering that Apple is up to 10.8, it is ridiculous they still don't have this ironed out. It simply should not have been this difficult to install the driver just so I could get it working.But that was just a taste of what was to come with this printer. It is frustrating to operate. I try to load in an *Epson* paper, with the settings *Epson* recommends, in the single sheet feeder that Epson instructs I am to use... but it won't give me the option of actually choosing the paper I need. It is greyed out. I have set the roller guide to the side and done everything I can tell I'm supposed to do, but it won't let me choose the paper I need and then it won't print, because it says I don't have the right paper setting chosen. I go round and round in circles trying to figure out how to get it to let me print. Then it turns out it wants the paper in the regular tray, which is not the one Epson says to use for the particular paper I was trying to print on. When I finally manage to print something, the quality is not that remarkable. Color matching is difficult. I upgraded from a simple 4-color Epson 1100 and it had better print quality that was easier to achieve.I should add that every one of the many printers I've had has been an Epson. I'm a hobbyist photographer and an artist. I understand how to use ICC profiles and know how to choose different print settings. But the color on this is just not as close as what I had on my less expensive (and less expensive to maintain) 1100, which seems almost bizarre to me.On the plus side, once it will deign to print something, it is very quick and quiet. Although, as others have noted, it also goes through its ink cartridges relatively quickly.
источник
Profile no image

Небулоид-8FJKM

15.12.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought a refurbished r2000 from Epson for $349.00 with a one year warranty. Additional years were available.I've had the Epson r2000 Pro Photo Printer about two weeks and I've given it a workout.. I've printed 52- 13 x 19 prints on the highest setting and over 40 -8.5 x 11 prints also at the highest setting. All prints were beautiful. They were my wildlife shots from safaris in South Africa.The printer worked flawlessly, but I did find it uses the gloss optimizer at a faster rate than the other cartridges, followed by the gloss black and then cyan. Printing on semigloss photo paper at the highest quality settings--For the prints that I've done I've used 4 gloss Optimizer, 3 gloss black, 2 cyan. And one or less of the other cartridges. I've not used any matte paper.For quality, I have a picture of a female leopard and you can actually count her whiskers in the picture.When printing on 13 x 19 paper using WiFi the prints were taking almost 30 minutes each print.(I do have a slow router) I decided to connect the printer directly to my computer and it cut the time down to six minutes and 23 seconds. For the 8.5 x 11 when connected to the computer the prints were taking three minutes 11 seconds.Now for the good news!! There seems to be a glut of genuine Epson ink for this printer. You can buy a set of 8 genuine Epson cartridges for as little as $14.30. Amazon has them listed at $21.98 and they work perfectly with your printer. There is no problem with the printer not recognizing them. They come vacuum shrink wrapped just like the cartridges that are supplied by Epson. You can also find genuine gloss optimizer on eBay for $8.99 + $2.50 shipping.PS -- -- if you're looking for an outstanding photo paper try Red River Photo Paper, it is the heaviest best looking paper that I have ever found..----If you try this paper stop back and leave your opinion it might help others. Thanks
источник
Profile no image

Небулоид-2HZPG

17.04.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

When I clicked on a printer offered in the Vine program I had no idea what I was getting into. Matter of fact, I didn't even realize they made printers THIS big!To start, I am not a professional photographer. I do love to take photos on my digital camera, and I have a gazillion that I still have to print. I love larger prints, and have a lot of photos from New Mexico and Arizona that I would love to frame on my walls.The Epson Stylus offers many options. I feel it will take me some time to "learn" this printer well enough to consider this an expert review. So my initial thoughts and impressions are very, very positive with this machine. It can do canvas rolls, rolled paper, sheets etc. It is very well made. The setup was very easy, I was printing in no time. Right now, I am doing simple print jobs and learning the ropes in photo editing with my Corel software. I am amazed at the quality of the photos coming out of this printer. My prior experience was with an HP 5510 and this Epson (of course) blows that experience out of the water. The HP was no slouch, just in a different league.I'd say this is a purchase for a hobbyist. It is rather cheap to go to websites and order okay looking prints. This takes up quite a bit of precious desk real estate. In my mind, it is a luxury and a very, very nice item. So far I have done 10 8x10 prints and am eagerly awaiting my rolled photo paper that I ordered here. The prints were beautiful, but I am sure as I research I will perfect this even more.As a machine, this gets a 5/5. I'm sure if you have even found this printer you pretty much know what you are looking for so all I can say is this thing is very sturdy, fast and so far no problems. Hope this helps!Update 5/30/12I have printed more photos from my Ofoto account. Mostly larger prints of my children and some of those New Mexico photos. Perhaps you have seen pics of White Sands National Monument? Well, my previous Canon printer and the HP 5510 could not handle these pics with all the white and the glare. The photos were passable, but still looked tacky and the depth of the whites just seemed flat and washed out. I tried them on the Epson printer and the result was a lot more satisfactory. I am not sure if it is the gloss that does it? Yet I am using the same Kodak paper I have used with the other printers. The pics of the kids came out very, very nicely. And the speed at which this printer prints has me floored and of course now family is piping up with their own orders, so this item is really getting some good work and is actually decent on the ink usage.
источник
Profile no image

ТерраБот-9SUVA

23.05.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I have been using LightScribe burners for the last few years for putting labels on my CD's and DVD's and I am very happy with them. However, they take close to 30 minutes and they are only in greyscale. So, I started looking at color CD/DVD labels. The paste on labels are a definite "NO" for me as they tend to peel up over time and they can throw the CD/DVD off balance, which will either damage the player or make the CD/DVD unreadable.I started my hunting looking at CD/DVD label printers themselves, but $1,500 was way too high and they were using inkjet technology anyway. So, I broadened my search to printers that could be used for regular printing and CD/DVD printing.The Epson Stylus Photo R2000 was among the best in class and one of the highest rated from the customers and at $499, it was in the right price range.Setting the printer up was the toughest part but once you put in the CD and connect it to the wireless network, everything else falls into place. It doesn't have an LCD panel so checking ink levels and all that needs to be done from the computer.I tested the software that comes with the printer and it is fairly straight forward. However, I think the way it handles text is annoying. I haven't been able to figure out how to change the color of text at all. I have been able to place images and round the text around the CD/DVD.When I actually started printing DVD's (I had a project of 35 DVD's I needed created in one day) I was burning two DVD's at a time and the R2000 was keeping up with printing the label on them at high quality and full coverage. The image I had as the background was mostly black with some color in the middle and then white text (again, I haven't been able to figure out how to put color in the text). Knowing that I was using a lot of black ink, I checked my ink levels at the end of the job and the black ink is only slightly down. WOW!I am very impressed with how the printer handles ink, that is a big selling point right there. Replacement ink, for a full 8 cartridges, is only $28. That is another selling point. It is fast at printing the CD/DVD labels, it takes about 2 - 3 minutes to print full coverage at high quality. It is faster with lower quality and less coverage.I'm sold on the printer, not necessarily the software, but the printer is outstanding. The software on the included CD is for Mac and PC. I am using a Mac, so my review is based on that.
источник
Profile no image

Спектроник-5BUZU

30.03.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I did my research by reading many online reviews and customer comments from a variety of web sites - no actual test drives or in-store touch and feels. Pretty much limited my choices to Epson photo printers as they have frequently been given high marks for the quality of the image (although some low marks for replacement ink costs). Made my choice since this printer - R2000 - has relatively small amounts of individual ink quantities and, thus, relatively low replacement ink costs. A slightly higher rated Epson printer had very expensive replacement ink costs due to much larger ink capacity. I think it was more of a high use printer. I don't think the R2000 was designed for this nor did i desire or need this capabilityThe first prints were excellent. Set up was very easy with clear and concise instructions. The only comment that i might add was that this printer will not fit on the corner of your desk - it's a whopper - 13" x 25" footprint - since it was designed for formats larger than the 8 x 10 that I work with. I am an amateur photographer and archival quality 8 x 10 is about as large as I want to print. I do use the Epson papers and am satisfied with the results of the matte paper. Less so with the glossy. The glossy finish appears applied to the paper during printing rather than the paper itself being glossy.Excellent product!
источник
Profile no image

Странник-8JNIZ

25.03.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

The Epson 2880 is a very good printer. I have never had any quibbles about its print quality. It will print images that are equal to Epson's 3880, which is the bottom of Epson's professional line. I own both printers so I know what each one is capable of doing. However, the 2880 has two flaws. The first is ink tanks that are way too small and don't last very long, which increases the cost per print. The second is the user must physically swap ink tanks when switching from printing on matte papers to papers that require photo black ink such as Epson's Premium Luster paper. Fortunately, Epson's Stylus Photo R3000 has corrected these two problems. The 3000 has much larger ink tanks and the 3000 will automatically switch black inks when the user selects the type of paper to print on. The larger ink tanks and automatic ink switching make the workflow much more efficient on the R3000 and the cost per print less. I doubt the user will see any physical difference between prints made on the 2880 and the 3000 since both use the same ink set. To be fair, when I bought my Epson R2880, the R3000 was not available. Epson has since upgraded the R2880 to the newer R3000. If purchasing price is a consideration, buy the 2880 but if you are concerned about efficient workflow and a less expensive cost per print, buy the 3000.
источник
Profile no image

НаноРейдер-4ABFG

25.03.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I was looking to replace my old Epson P2000 printer with something that could produce at least as high quality print as that one, and was advised by Epson that this printer would do the job, after looking around at all different brands and their specs. I ordered this one on faith, and when it arrived I was quick to put it through its paces. I was astounded at its even higher quality print capabilities, greater speed, as well as other features that made it even better than my old one. It does an excellent job, and was even less expensive than my original P2000 Epson, so it was a win all around.Its multiple individual color cartridges make it easy to replace only the color depleted, its paper feed even discerns when a different type of paper is inserted from the one you programmed it for and will not proceed until you have reset it, its paper feed is unerring, always taking only a single sheet at a time, a low color cartridge alert warns you of exactly which color is soon needing replacement, and it is overall a very attractively styled printer.I strongly recommend this printer to anyone needing high quality color printing. It prints on oversize paper, banners, as well as standard size paper, and using Presentation Matte paper by Epson I get phenomenal color prints. A five star product all the way!
источник
Profile no image

Аргонавт-8GTPB

12.03.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought this printer to force myself to get into actually printing out and displaying some of my pics. Have been fortunate to travel to a lot of places but the pics mostly sit on my hard drive. I previously bought another brand of photo printer and it was a disaster so I lost interest.I found setup to be quite easy. I already had the Epson 845 so the software nosed around and found the internet connection by itself. Like the 845 it has been rock solid in holding the wireless connection.I've been experimenting by printing out 4x6's and playing with the various settings. I haven't had any of the alignment problems I had with the previous printer I bought ....thank goodness. I don't think the ink usage is that bad.Pic quality is quite nice. Still learning to tune the colors. I think the glossy surface looks good.I have several panoramas I took a few weeks ago up in the Tetons including one at dawn. Looking forward to using the roll function and see how it looks on my wall.I spent quite a bit of time researching printers on the internet before I picked the R2000. One of the few that had very consistent positive reviews. I can see why. Very happy so far and I recommend it for an easy to use, high quality, mid-level printer.Note: do read the color management guide. It is key to properly understanding/managing how the printer handles your pic.
источник
Profile no image

Плазмонавт-0BBHA

25.03.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I am an artist who sells prints of colored pencil drawings. I was paying a company to make prints for me, but it became clear that I could justify buying a nice printer of my own. The R2000 works well with rich vibrant colors. I print small prints and greeting cards on it and my customers love them. I love that the inks are rated to last a very long time. The printer is very easy to use with Photoshop and downloadable ICC profiles for different papers.My only problem has been with the sheet feeder in the back of the printer. It is quite difficult to get the paper to feed correctly. I usually end up making the printer use the normal sheet feeder for thicker paper and it works fine. But if I had a really thick sheet of media, I would not be pleased - the back feeder is very picky.I use higher end giclee printers at my day job and this little guy does just as well. I have to tweak things a little bit in Photoshop because of the different inkset, but the finished product is just as vibrant and detailed. I have printed on rag fine art paper, glossy photo paper and thinner card stock and in every case I get quality images.
источник
Profile no image

Сатурниан-6WZBR

28.12.2012

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Granted this is the only photo printer I've used. However, I am OCD and did a ton of research as to which one to buy. I only give it four stars because the matte/gloss ink cartridges that have to be switched out. Its annoying because I have to stop and I can never remember to bring the one with me I need when I (sometimes) take the printer home. I like that it's wide format, that it can print on 100% cardstock-and does do without having to bend the cardstock in the least. It allows you to manually load the paper in the front of the printer.My set up/work flow (if it matters) I use a Canon7d, Lightroom 4 (first LR2 then LR3), Photoshop CS6. I print large portraits and art. I do not print snapshots.GOOD:ReliabilityHolds its value (its selling for what I paid for it in 2008.)Non-Epson supplies work just fine with the printer. (while Epson encourages on every level use of Epson materials for the best output-they do not make it impossible to use other paper vendors, etc. I had a Brother printer that basically made the the use of non-Brother supplies impossible.)Not too heavy to move every once in awhile.Ink cartridges last and are not too expensiveBAD:Having to switch out ink cartridges.It takes a minute to warm up-I think it checks ALL of the inks levels at first-an it doesn't do that until you sendIt is heavy and takes up a lot of space-but if you have to have wide format you don't have another choice.
источник
Profile no image

Гелиос-7DAFN

23.11.2011

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Needing a good but "lower" end printer I did some research and settled on this model mostly based on its black and white features. I am generally happy with the decision but after working with it for a few months I have found a few things that make the printer review less than it could be.Cost- I do the majority of photo work in B and W photography and the printer is excellent at printing but is a real ink hog. After about 20 prints ranging from 13 by 19 to smaller 8.5 by 11's, the low ink warning came on. Having to replace the three black ink cartridges at a cost of about $40 I was back online. Needless to say this is NOT an inexpensive printer to run.Documentation- The user's manual is almost nonexistent! I am not a professional photographer and I do not have a large group of people to draw information from so I am largely dependent on reading the manual and adjusting my ideas about how things work as I go along. The manual will get you up and running but that is about it. I needed to learn a great deal through trial and error about how Photoshop and the printer interact in order to get a quality print out of the machine. Things like color handling, saturation, features of different papers, and color gamut switching all were largely ignored in the manual. Needless to say this has been a long expensive process that could have been eased through a manual written by a competent professional person who knew something about the printer.Photoshop and printer control- I nearly sent the printer back over issues related to how Photoshop and the printer communicate. It all started when I changed to Matte Black printing. I have come to find out that you can't change cartridges while Photoshop is running and connected with the printer. While this should be pointed out in the manual it took a week of trying different things and an hour call to tech support to be able to configure the inks and paper properly. Luckily, after a wasted hour on the phone with low level tech support I was pushed to a supervisor who had the problem diagnosed and fixed in a matter of minutes. Mike was his name and he turned out to be a professional photographer. I learned more in a 15 minute conversation and a few subsequent emails with him then I did over multiple readings of the entire manual- he is the one that should writing the manuals!Overall, I am happy with the printer and I have been able to get a number of good prints out of it but I would not expect to get quality prints straight out of the box. I guess no printer is able to determine how I see things in a photograph and on the computer screen but a more details about how things work in the printer would make the learning curve a bit less steep and costly.
источник
Profile no image

Супернова-1OWBL

25.03.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

For years I have bought all in one printers, I decided to by an Epson 2000 printer only (made by Seiko, Japan)and an Epson Scanner rather that another all in one. My choice was a wise one. The printer produces incredibly high quality photographs on glossy or matte paper as well as simple B&W documents. Ink costs are much less with this printer. There are 7 color cartridges and a finishing glaze cartridge as well. If when a particular color runs low, you only replace that color and leave the rest at the levels they are at. In an all in one you have to replace the whole color cartridge each time it runs low. The Espson system not only produces superior color prints due to the 7 colors it has to work with but saves money on ink as only the color that is low needs to be replaced. It is a big machine but the results are well worth the cost if you are serious about having high quality prints as well as a plain paper printer for simple copies: Get one. I'll never go back to all in ones again.
источник
Profile no image

Интеллектор-9WSZZ

27.03.2013

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I bought this printer to make matte fine art prints in the 11x14 or 8.5x11 sizes on fine art paper. After a while, it started to refuse to load the paper. It turns out, the paper dust gets on the rubber roller that feeds in the paper and starts to slip. So I figure this out months later and use a bit of scotch tape to remove the dust from the roller. It also has problems printing the full darkest parts of the image. Epson tells me to only use their paper, so I give up on the expensive art paper I bought and buy epson fine art paper. I multiple times clean the heads, fully charge them with ink, still a problem with the 11x14 sizes! Epson tells me the paper has a slight curve to it from slight water absorption, and to heat the paper slightly or press it so it removes the curve. I do this and finally, finally, I get a decent print. This is such a fussy printer that I wish I hadn't bought it. I had a r1900 that was much less trouble.
источник
Profile no image

НеоВояжер-1NSRN

25.03.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I think the images that this printer reproduces are simply stunning. Color reproduction is "darkroom quality". The number of paper formats this printer supports has really expanded my "decorating" choices (I'm an amateur photographer). I've always been happy with the reliability of Epson products and this printer bolsters that reputation. Ink (as always) is expensive, but you know; it certainly is $100's cheaper than having enlargements and framing done professionally.I only gave this printer 4 stars; but NOT because of any feature missing, but rather simply cost. For the MSRP price, you have to be pretty committed to your photography; because you wouldn't want to use it for general purpose printing. I wish for (Epson's sake), that they could make a less-expensive version!Nonetheless, I HIGHLY RECCOMEND it for the user who just wants "more" from their photos!
источник
Profile no image

ТехноНаблюдатель-1VUIL

25.03.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

set-up has been easy. Although I got a not genuine Epson Ink message at first (black ink)...that was pretty annoying, specially just out of the box.It went away after much work, really Epson ? the printer did not want to print? this is kind of low specially on your own cartridges...Print quality is great, even on 13'' roll paper, instructions are not detailed enough though.Prints on 13'' x 19'' are quick, and great looking. This printer uses a lot of ink (it figures) but even more gloss optimizer...make sure you get plenty of that as well.Would I buy it again ?? FOR SURE ! if you want to get to the next level with either Publisher 2010 or Lightroom 4.3 this is the printer, this thing will print stuff you had no idea was there even on lower resolution pictures...EPSON...good JOB :)P.S keep in mind that you wont be able to find the ink off the shelf.
источник
Profile no image

Туманник-5BQKE

12.03.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Bought an Epson stylus Photo R2000 to replace my photo stylus 2200 which seems to have reached the end of its useful life and to give me network printing.Printer set up easy enough although after inserting the ink cartridges they did not prime as the instructions said they would; had to call support. They had me cycle the power and that took care of the problem.The printer would not install wireless using my WEP "button" on the router for some rason. Then tried to install for usb connection; software hung right after the printer was detected; back to support.Restarted the install program; again chose wireless, this time via usb and everything went as it should.Have a wonderful new printer, would have liked to have done it without support but I guess that is what they are there for... they were very professional, and got me up and running! Off to print my first newsletter!
источник
Profile no image

Астероид-0QBCI

25.03.2013

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

This is a good printer and seems to be working a long time without repairs, but I dislike the need to change from matte black to photo black each time I want to change paper type. It is a big pain and wastes a great deal of ink. I don't understand why, after the beauty of the R1900, Epson would go back to that kind of primitive ink design.And while I am at it: let me comment on a more general problem with Epson printers. I go through a lot of them because I do a few thousand prints per year. Used to be that all I had to do to get repairs was take a cab to an authorized service. Now there are very few places and they all require shipping each way and a 1-2 week wait for service. You are a large successful company. Why not design better service instead of expecting everyone to treat a printer like a disposable item?
источник
Profile no image

Странник-4XQPA

25.03.2013

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

Like the the shovel, I'm sure the Epson R2880 is designed to do the the job for which it was intended, but missing a handle ( clear instructions on how to use it or direct it to do what I want it to do) currently renders it useless until I learn how to construct the handle. I have spent many hours reading the instructions and have not had much success responding to the messages I get about loading paper in the right location. And if I were able to solve this problem, my ability to manipulate my downloaded watercolor images is seriously impared by my Apple computer not having certain required formatting capabilities. It is a 2011 Mac Pro.I paid good money for this unit because it was recommended to me by artist mentor. I will continue to try to correct my difficulties, but I wish this unit were more user friendly.
источник
Profile no image

НеоВояжер-7BKDC

05.02.2013

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

The printer is fine. Other reviews are good. The issue I'm addressing is that you should NOT count on getting your rebate. The paperwork is confounding, Epson response is slow, and the key is that the rebate documents change every single month. I'd advise you download the rebate form BEFORE you buy the printer and make sure it covers the exact timeframe you're planning on buying your printer. Make sure you've downloaded the correct one for the locale you live in.And my best advice, do NOT buy your printer toward the end of the month. The reason is that Epson immediately pulls the correct rebate forms at the beginning of the next month. What this means is if you bought your printer on January 31, if you go on-line on February 1, the correct rebate form will be gone. Search on Epson's site for the January form and you will not be able to find it.The printer is fine. Just expect to pay the full price since there's high odds you'll never actually get your rebate.
источник
Profile no image

МехаРейнджер-8GMLA

25.03.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I cannot say that I've used my printer everyday. If I had, I probably would have learned a valuable fact: Read page 25 where it says select from the following options, "Gloss Optimizer to add a glossy finish to your print." This option, at least on my printer, was set as a default. So, you guessed it, the gloss optimizer was applied to everything and quickly ran out and the printer wouldn't print until I did something... like find that option buried among Advanced Options and deselect it. Nevertheless, unbeknownst to me, I had printed my business cards with gloss optimizer and people began to remark, "Wow, beautiful, how did you get this laminated, gel finish?" As almost nobody notices business cards any more, this is a positive. So, so far, I'm very pleased with my Epson R2000.
источник
Profile no image

Вояджер-6JWKD

25.03.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

As a professional photographer I have used Epson printers for almost 20 years. I tried a Canon 17 inch printer and just didn't like it. Although it never seemed to clog, it used an inordinate amount of ink. I use an Epson 7890 for a lot of my printing but bought the 2880 as a second printer to run single 8x10's etc. I am a little disappointed at the ink expense with the 2880, but what else is new....Ink and gold seem to be on the same standard. Secondly , the prints do not match the 7890 prints very closely. I had hoped that using the same type of ink and the onboard profiles I would not have to adjust each file depending on the printer.That said it does give very rich and detailed prints.Epson Stylus Photo R2880 Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA16201)
источник
Profile no image

Интеллектор-6XFOI

25.04.2012

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

This Epson Photo Printer is very nice. The quality of the photos that I've printed are pretty incredible. The printer was packaged very well and it's very easy to use once you have it set up. There are some great features that come with this printer including the ability to use a roll of paper to print on and the ability to print on a CD or DVD if desired. I have yet to use either of these functions but I think it's great that the option is there to use if desired.Setting the printer up was pretty easy but I did run into a couple problems. I used the quick-start guide and followed step-by-step. I ran into my first problem in step #3 after inserting the ink cartridges. In step #2 it told you to turn on the printer. Step #3 was to insert the cartridges. This was simple to do but after inserting the cartridges it told you to shut the lids and that the printer would prime the ink. It said not to do anything (including turning off the printer) for 4 minutes until this process was complete. Problem was I didn't hear anything happening. I waited the 4 minutes anyway and nothing was happening. I ended up turning off the printer and then turned it back on. Then the priming began and lasted for the 4 minutes.My next problem came in steps 5 & 6 where you set up the connection and install the software. I wanted it set up wirelessly and although my router qualified for setting it up without using a USB cord, it wouldn't work. A USB cord is recommended for setting up the printer however, a USB cord is not included. Once I used the USB cord to set up the printer via Wi-Fi, I was good to go. Although it wasn't hard to do, it's just a pain if you don't have a USB cord handy.Yes, the printer is rather large and bulky and yes, it's a bit loud and slow but, it works great. After the initial set-up issues I've had no other problems with this printer. I would recommend it. The quality is great.
источник
Показаны отзывы 289-312 из 461.

Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой

9.9/10 баллов

Fujifilm Instax Mini Link 2

110 отзывов

от 14139.00 руб.

9.4/10 баллов

HP LaserJet Pro M15w, ч/б, A4

271 отзывов

от 42280.00 руб.

9.4/10 баллов

Pantum M6507, ч/б, A4

2397 отзывов

от 30191.00 руб.

9.4/10 баллов

Pantum P2500W

46 отзывов

от 13852.00 руб.

9.3/10 баллов

Canon I-SENSYS LBP6030, ч/б, A4

105 отзывов

от 17874.00 руб.

9.2/10 баллов

HP Color Laser MFP 179fnw

190 отзывов

от 68839.00 руб.

9.2/10 баллов

deli P2000

44 отзывов

от 13499.00 руб.

9.1/10 баллов

Canon i-SENSYS LBP631CW

72 отзывов

от 37185.00 руб.

9.1/10 баллов

Digma DHP-2401W

121 отзывов

от 14661.00 руб.

9.1/10 баллов

Xiaomi Mijia Photo Printer 1S, цветн., м

372 отзывов

от 13186.00 руб.

9.1/10 баллов

Canon Pixma G1420

83 отзывов

от 59572.00 руб.

9/10 баллов

Canon i-Sensys LBP-6030

253 отзывов

от 22761.00 руб.

9/10 баллов

Brother HL-1223WR, ч/б, A4

460 отзывов

от 31990.00 руб.

9/10 баллов

Epson L18050 (C11CK38403)

30 отзывов

от 69535.00 руб.

9/10 баллов

Epson EcoTank L3210

292 отзывов

от 34276.00 руб.

9/10 баллов

Fujifilm Instax Link Wide

29 отзывов

от 23725.00 руб.

8.9/10 баллов

Canon ImageCLASS LBP6030 (8468B006)

8 отзывов

от 16805.00 руб.

8.9/10 баллов

Pantum P2506W

42 отзывов

от 17900.00 руб.

8.9/10 баллов

Canon Laser Shot LBP2900, ч/б, A4

103 отзывов

от 26012.00 руб.

8.9/10 баллов

HUAWEI PixLab B5 [CV81Z-WDM2]

33 отзывов

от 49990.00 руб.