Отзывы о Wi-Fi роутер D-link DIR-620S
646 отзывов пользователей o D-link DIR-620S
Пользовались
D-link DIR-620S?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
I was initially using a TP-Link double antenna router, which is not a good one due to it's poor reception capabilities.
This router is one of the best option in this price of ₹899.


Thank You!


Which is not compatible to us. The configuration is much tuffer than previous product and also i realise the reset bottom is not working on this device.
This is for your knowledge, please comparison
The product with previous model.
Thanks.


Good Signal , u can install it easily... 4 lan port and 1 wan port... Speed lags when more than 2 device connected... For office works it's good...
5/10 I rate...
Thanks Amazon for fast delivery 🙂




The sad part is that the quality test on this particular product may not have been done effectively which in turn coates me.
If Amazon reads this, I'd request them to reach out to me.




1. setup process
I've never had to EVER put my phone into airplane mode to setup a device....WTF. (at lease the app tells you in the setup process to disable cellular network)
2. firmware
I made sure to upgraded to the latest firmware (1.08). After several reboots, 1/2 devices is showing up as 1.07.
3. Wifi SSID
it only supports "Only A-Z, a-z, 0-9, “-”, “_”, and spaces are allowed"
this is very unfortunate. We should be able to use any character we want for higher security
4. Router / Bridge mode
I already have a very robust and capable router. I wanted to use this system as just Access Point mode. I had to settle for bridge mode. After switching to bridge mode, I lost guest-wifi ability. Again...WTF?!?
5. point devices
the 2 devices are no longer showing as being connected to the system when I use wired connection for the backhual
6. high latency
one of the reviews mentioned slow connection. download speeds are VERY SLOW. I have 200mb internet connection. I'm barely able to get 3mbps when connected to this system.
Maybe I got a broken unit(s) like other reviewers? I'm not sure. what I do know is like the other bad reviewers, I had a really bad experience with this. I'm going to return it back.


Now to the truth of things. We do photo and video editing and while the connection says it is fast it can not keep up with my Asus RT-AC66U access points and routers. It starts out at 42Mbps for about 3-5 seconds then drops to less than 1Mbps. The unit gets hot as soon as I access large data files. My AC setup with my RT-AC66Us transfer at 50-65MBps for the whole transfer and I tried this we 4 different laptops and 2 desktops that all have AC-9260 all the way up to AX200's that do 160MHz connections.
I do not think this is a valid Netgear as it looks like it was a refurb or a knock off. Very displeasing and I will be returning it.
Just disappointing at this point that this fails on so many levels for what it was built for. I do not blame Netgear, their equipment looks more polished than this and I am sure they perform better too.

And it’s simply false advertising. They say “extremely high power antennas!” But it’s a load of BOLOGNA. Two of the antennas are a measly 2 DBI (think: your router from 2003 when roadrunner first came out and most people still had Dial-Up) and the other two *gasp* are 5 dBi... NOT TO MENTION THEY ARE ALL OMNI. WHY.
Not everyone has the luxury of being able to install the router in the dead center of their living space.
I currently use an outdoor 20 DBI directional antenna on my 5 year old Netgear so I can get full coverage in my shed and backyard. I also use a 10 DBI directional antenna to point directly at my lovely repeater in the basement. The other port has a loss-less splitter on it with 2x 9 DBI OMNI antennas. I thought to myself: gee it’s time for an upgrade... yeah. A completely utterly worthless downgrade. They charged me more for something worse than my 5 year old router cost back when it was brand new.
All those replacement parts I mentioned (outdoor 20DBI antenna $20; indoor directional 10DBI $5, 2x Omni 9DBI and splitter $3 total for all parts::: for those who can’t math well I spent $28 four years ago when I first got Google Fiber Gigabit Internet to upgrade my router. Now my 5 year old router gives me 450mbps on 2.4 ghz in the shed 100 feet from my house, and 900 on 5 ghz inside the house. On the basement repeater I get around 450 mbps...
Fast forward to today: unboxing day. 5 years later. I open this utter piece of garbage and comparatively it looks like a Geo Metro compared to my Ferrari (which by the way was $120 when I bought it 5 years ago. Cheaper than this junk. I’m not even adjusting for inflation. Even if you add in the cost of the antennas I bought for my old router the cost would be equal. EQUAL. 5 years apart. No inflation added.
I have no clue what I’m going to do with this. I am absolutely furious. Never buy D-Link again.

The new one is far more (physically) lightweight, but who cares? Because it's setup software and "admin dashboard" are FAR, FAR better and easier to use than the old model.
AND (to our amazement), even our home-wide Ethernet network (wired) is MUCH snappier than with the older model. Progress!
We only have Wi-Fi for (frequent guests), but this IS a dual-band "AC" (the successor to "N") model, at "only" 1200 speed, which is fine for the freeloader visiting us. Ha ha. We bought another D-Link because the first one has been SO reliable (it was still chugging along, albeit slowly).
Thanks, D-Link



my main complaints were
1)the web interface is terrible. There were times where I would change settings, apply them, and the modem would have a completely different configuration on startup.
2)There's no easy way to run this router with DCHP disabled. I allocated a static IP in my cable modem, set it on this router, and disabled DCHP, items connecting to the router via wifi were unable to acquire an IP.
3)The router is only happy when it's on a different network address than my cable modem. my local network address is 192.169.0.xxxx, and this router would only work with DHCP enabled, and it would create a new network address 192.168.100.xxxx
4)I pretty much gave up on the idea of integrating the router in the local network, so I focus on getting it working on its own network (they only way it likes to work), the first time I ran a speed test I got shockingly fast speed (250mbs/300mbs) but as I continued to test the speed drastically dropped to around 50mbs. the upload speeds never hit their full potential of 20mbs
I would say this router is pretty bad, not enough options, broken UI, and the speed are insanely inconstant.


I do use this router with two laptops, one tablet, two cel phones using wifi calling, and 8 ethernet devices, some of them POE cameras, and one of them an ethernet smart TV, so the cumulative data can add up. Remember, this is in a metal building with foil insulation and metal walls with metal vehicles inside, going through metal insulated doors, as well. I do recommend setting two antennas straight up and two sideways. So far, so good, but the improvement is extremely noticeable. I will likely update on long term performance in the future.
