Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10040 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
When the camera came I was disappointed with the small size of the screen- only 2" versus most of the competitors that are 2.5" and yes it does make a big difference in how the picture looks. Big deal the lens swivels around, and after a day or so you will get tired of that. It does nothing to actually help the camera. And also if you look at the lens from the side it is hazy and lacks color, which is a sign of a cheap screen.
Also notice this camera takes four large batteries whereas most of the competition takes only two. These extra batteries make it almost impossible to fit this camera in your pocket and weigh the camera down.
Most importantly I was disappointed with the optics of the camera. 4x zoom should come in clearer than what this camera delivers. Objects only 30 feet away will come in faintly and will lack crispness. One should not have to buy overpriced, proprietary lenses to take a good picture. A better bet would be the Fuji Finepix with 9MP which is more portable and has much better resolution.
Two complains I have with this camera: body size and the LCD screen. My brother just bought a Samsung 7MP point and shot camera during Christmas. Around $160. It also uses 2 AA batteries and the screen size is the same as my A540. The Samsung is slimmer and its LCD screen is much sharper than mine. I am not sure the picture quality of its printed photo since I have not seen one yet.
For the price I paid (around $170 shipped), this is a good camera. I will keep it for awhile.
[...]
I called Canon and they said it is made of a "durable plastic" in order to make it lighter. I think that should be mentioned in the description.
Oh, and the lens is also made of plastic, which I didn't know (glass is superior but of course would cost more). My only complaint is that once again, there is no mention of that in the description.
I sold my Canon G5, a while back now, and loved that camera. Bought an Olympus E-500 to replace it, and as much as I love the olympus, I am selling it because I would prefer a point and shoot.
I read around about the A620, and everywhere I read it got rave reviews, so I figured I can't go wrong with it. I got it this morning, and have been snapping all day, and it is just brilliant! I have compared it to my E-500 (which is a DSLR) and the A620 comes very very very... you get the drift... close! I have taken pictures of the same thing moments after each other and displayed them on my computer screen, and it would take a better eye than mine to see any difference! OK the E-500 has more functions and settings, but I can't see myself ever using them, most likely to stay in auto mode!
Well, I dont know how canon do this, but at this price the quality of the pictures is great! You can't/won't go wrong with this little beauty!
As for the negatives, well some rechargable batteries wouldn't have gone a miss, but they cost next to nothing now-a-days. Also the feel of it is very plasticy, doesnt feel as well put together as my old Canon G5, but its still very sturdy.
So what you waiting for? go get one now! :-)
Image Stabilization
It is making its way into all lines of cameras, including the Canon Elph series. Sony, Kodak -- they are all moving towards image stabilization.
I have used several cameras with image stabilization and I will never go back to a camera that doesn't have it.
The 2" LCD is also small by today's standards. The Kodak EasyShare One is selling at a very attractive price point right now (< $200, I got one for $149). It has a 3" swivel LCD, and great video mode with high compression and high quality. However, that camera also lacks image stabilization.
A camera can have excellent specs in all areas, but if it doesn't have image stabilization, blurry pictures will inevitably result in many lighting conditions.
Save your money, wait for image stabilization to make its way into this line of Canon cameras, or check out the many cameras on the market that have this now.
I am very happy with the Battery Life, performance, and price. Shutter speed is much better than my old Kodak. I also like the optical viewfinder and don't understand why anyone would make a camera w/o one. The LCD screen on this camera is great!
The only negative - i have a hard time with all the options. I have not and probably won't use the movie features or many of the other features this camera offers.
If you like pressing the shutter button and then having the picture snap two seconds later, this is the camera for you.
I like the A630 very much.
Advantages:
1. It has a great resolution, great colours and an absolutely fabulous print quality.
2. 7 megapixel allows substantial cropping of images.
3. Great battery life.
4. Flip LCD is fun to play with.
Disadvantages
1. The flash sometimes gives bright spots.
2. Small Screen; While most of it's competitors give a 2.5" screen this one only has a 2" screen.
3. Heavy; It uses four AA batteries which makes it heavy. This is not a carry in my pocket camera.
All in all, it is camera meant for ameteur photography enthusiasts. I will recommend Cannon A700 above this camera for the following reasons:
1. Bigger screen
2. Uses two AA batteries which make it lighter and easier to use.
3. The biggest advantage is that is has a 6x optical zoom which is a big plus as compared to a 7 megapix.
At the time I bought my camera A700 was unavailable so I went with A620 which is a very decent and does its job pretty well.






