Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10040 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
'Snobby purists insist on RAW.'
No, people who understand bit depth and post-processing insist on RAW. If you insist on calling people who are educated and skillful snobby then that's your (sad) business.
'RAW takes hours of work for marginal improvements.'
It does not. It takes seconds or at worst minutes.
'JPEG is better for almost all applications.'
JPG is 'adequate' for almost all applications but it is certainly not better (unless by better you mean more convenient). RAw images are 16 bit and JPGs only 12 bit so again, learn!
Now to my review: the S80 takes marvellous still images. I've used an S70 for over a year (mostly in RAW mode Mr Griffin) including a trip to Japan and it's generally (although not consistently) the equal of my Canon 20D DSLR. The S80 is better than the S70 because of the slightly higher resolution, the digic II processing (faster response) and very importantly the video mode. The S70 has a poor video mode (640 x 480 @ 10fps and only 30 second files) but the S80 blows it away with 640 x 480 @ 30fps or 1024 x 768 @ 15fps! Both the modes are constant up to 1GB or card fill. Now think about this: put a couple of strips of masking tape over the top and bottom of the lcd monitor to give a 16:9 aspect, shoot in the XGA mode and then use Premiere (or whatever) to crop the 4:3 output of the S80 into 16:9. What we have here people is a pocket widescreen camcorder at near broadcast quality(ish... & mono sound... but that's picky).
Unreservedly recommended.
Started to take some pictures (which is what it's meant to do) and I am absolutely blown away by the quality and ease of use of this camera. I'm a bit of a novice with a camera so having just the basics is great...but then you can also make everything completely manual.
In manual mode I could get a crystal clear picture of something that was 1cm away from the lense!!!!
Awesome camera....buy it if you can put up with it being a little bulky and feel a little toy-like!!!!!
I'm disappointed because I do like the photos that the camera takes when it does function properly.
Fortunately, I bought it at Costco, so it's going back.
I would highly recommend this camera. I have had zero problems and love Canon products.
For starters, the thing had to go straight from the box to the canon repair center (on my dime natch, as my wife purchased the camera several months before as a birthday present so there was no option to return it to the store once my birthday rolled around, and canon did not offer to pick up the shipping): the image was blurry and overexposed.
Now that I have it back from the shop, here's my beefs: a) the viewfinder is atrocious -- only the center of the image in the viewfinder is in focus, with the rest being a blurry mess. b) Pictures are still a little blurry, even at maximum resolution. c) The supplied software doesn't have much to recommend; just a very basic image downloading/viewing program along with a program to stitch images together.
The issue is this camera makes an annoying clicking noise during videos, and it shows up on the files when you watch them on your computer. The reason for this is the microphone inside picks up the sounds of the camera's internal pieces clicking and whirring. The SD600 does NOT have this issue with videos.
Buy the SD600 instead!
I was a little surprised that this camera still comes with the 16 MG card - definitely upgrade to the 512 or 1 GB card. I use the video function infrequently and if this is an important feature for you there are probably better cameras out there. But if you need great pictures in almost every possible light setting, this camera will be excellent.
I read a couple of reviews that slammed the indoor light conditions - not true. There are a lot of settings, as one reviewer noted, and a few minutes working with the instructions will have you taking great shots in any light. Anyway, if you upgrade to the 1 GB card, you can take lots of practice shots.
Any interference with the action of the zoom lens renders the camera inoperable. It must be returned to Canon for repairs. To their credit, they did repair our camera no charge in about 2-3 weeks. If I had known this product was a fragile as an empty eggshell, I would have never purchased it. Caveat emptor, or "we reserve the right to take advantage of the weak, the stupid, and the ignorant. If you want trust...buy a dog"
Because my previous camera was such a GOOD one, I found myself to be somewhat picky before purchasing the next one. Reason I started researching was because my old one started malfunctioning w/in 1-1/2 years of usage.
Things I looked for were: GOOD quality images, Video with Sound, uses SD (instead of Sony's annoying Memory sticks), Cheap, and Easy to Use.
Since I never used a Canon before, I was worried about the Image quality and ease of use. But with so many good reviews, I had to try it out. This camera just stood out from the REST of the cameras because of it's A+ rating on every site and having the LEAST negative reviews.
I admit, I am happy with my purchase. Never knew I could take pictures this GOOD!
Negative Side: A/V door is extremely flimsy which worries me to an extent. Still sturdy, just flimsy. Also, the Lens cover on my camera seems a little uneven (Doesn't seem to close as properly as my sony digital). Not sure if it's with all cameras or just mines. Seems to work fine though.
I own two other Canon Digital camera's (3.2mp elph and 8mp DSLR rebel)and have never regreted buying canon.
- is much more light weight (works with 2 batteries).
- Controls are easy to operate
- Screen colors are not that realistic (but photos would come with real colors)
- Photo quality is good (comparable to A80)
- Even though it is entry level digital camera, I guess it is sufficient for some one like me who takes lot of photos and expect them to come nice without having any photography skills
- Surprisingly its video came out better than A80 in low light






