Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10038 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
I was a little surprised that this camera still comes with the 16 MG card - definitely upgrade to the 512 or 1 GB card. I use the video function infrequently and if this is an important feature for you there are probably better cameras out there. But if you need great pictures in almost every possible light setting, this camera will be excellent.
I read a couple of reviews that slammed the indoor light conditions - not true. There are a lot of settings, as one reviewer noted, and a few minutes working with the instructions will have you taking great shots in any light. Anyway, if you upgrade to the 1 GB card, you can take lots of practice shots.


Any interference with the action of the zoom lens renders the camera inoperable. It must be returned to Canon for repairs. To their credit, they did repair our camera no charge in about 2-3 weeks. If I had known this product was a fragile as an empty eggshell, I would have never purchased it. Caveat emptor, or "we reserve the right to take advantage of the weak, the stupid, and the ignorant. If you want trust...buy a dog"






Because my previous camera was such a GOOD one, I found myself to be somewhat picky before purchasing the next one. Reason I started researching was because my old one started malfunctioning w/in 1-1/2 years of usage.
Things I looked for were: GOOD quality images, Video with Sound, uses SD (instead of Sony's annoying Memory sticks), Cheap, and Easy to Use.
Since I never used a Canon before, I was worried about the Image quality and ease of use. But with so many good reviews, I had to try it out. This camera just stood out from the REST of the cameras because of it's A+ rating on every site and having the LEAST negative reviews.
I admit, I am happy with my purchase. Never knew I could take pictures this GOOD!
Negative Side: A/V door is extremely flimsy which worries me to an extent. Still sturdy, just flimsy. Also, the Lens cover on my camera seems a little uneven (Doesn't seem to close as properly as my sony digital). Not sure if it's with all cameras or just mines. Seems to work fine though.

I own two other Canon Digital camera's (3.2mp elph and 8mp DSLR rebel)and have never regreted buying canon.

- is much more light weight (works with 2 batteries).
- Controls are easy to operate
- Screen colors are not that realistic (but photos would come with real colors)
- Photo quality is good (comparable to A80)
- Even though it is entry level digital camera, I guess it is sufficient for some one like me who takes lot of photos and expect them to come nice without having any photography skills
- Surprisingly its video came out better than A80 in low light



When the camera came I was disappointed with the small size of the screen- only 2" versus most of the competitors that are 2.5" and yes it does make a big difference in how the picture looks. Big deal the lens swivels around, and after a day or so you will get tired of that. It does nothing to actually help the camera. And also if you look at the lens from the side it is hazy and lacks color, which is a sign of a cheap screen.
Also notice this camera takes four large batteries whereas most of the competition takes only two. These extra batteries make it almost impossible to fit this camera in your pocket and weigh the camera down.
Most importantly I was disappointed with the optics of the camera. 4x zoom should come in clearer than what this camera delivers. Objects only 30 feet away will come in faintly and will lack crispness. One should not have to buy overpriced, proprietary lenses to take a good picture. A better bet would be the Fuji Finepix with 9MP which is more portable and has much better resolution.


Two complains I have with this camera: body size and the LCD screen. My brother just bought a Samsung 7MP point and shot camera during Christmas. Around $160. It also uses 2 AA batteries and the screen size is the same as my A540. The Samsung is slimmer and its LCD screen is much sharper than mine. I am not sure the picture quality of its printed photo since I have not seen one yet.
For the price I paid (around $170 shipped), this is a good camera. I will keep it for awhile.


[...]

I called Canon and they said it is made of a "durable plastic" in order to make it lighter. I think that should be mentioned in the description.
Oh, and the lens is also made of plastic, which I didn't know (glass is superior but of course would cost more). My only complaint is that once again, there is no mention of that in the description.


I sold my Canon G5, a while back now, and loved that camera. Bought an Olympus E-500 to replace it, and as much as I love the olympus, I am selling it because I would prefer a point and shoot.
I read around about the A620, and everywhere I read it got rave reviews, so I figured I can't go wrong with it. I got it this morning, and have been snapping all day, and it is just brilliant! I have compared it to my E-500 (which is a DSLR) and the A620 comes very very very... you get the drift... close! I have taken pictures of the same thing moments after each other and displayed them on my computer screen, and it would take a better eye than mine to see any difference! OK the E-500 has more functions and settings, but I can't see myself ever using them, most likely to stay in auto mode!
Well, I dont know how canon do this, but at this price the quality of the pictures is great! You can't/won't go wrong with this little beauty!
As for the negatives, well some rechargable batteries wouldn't have gone a miss, but they cost next to nothing now-a-days. Also the feel of it is very plasticy, doesnt feel as well put together as my old Canon G5, but its still very sturdy.
So what you waiting for? go get one now! :-)

Image Stabilization
It is making its way into all lines of cameras, including the Canon Elph series. Sony, Kodak -- they are all moving towards image stabilization.
I have used several cameras with image stabilization and I will never go back to a camera that doesn't have it.
The 2" LCD is also small by today's standards. The Kodak EasyShare One is selling at a very attractive price point right now (< $200, I got one for $149). It has a 3" swivel LCD, and great video mode with high compression and high quality. However, that camera also lacks image stabilization.
A camera can have excellent specs in all areas, but if it doesn't have image stabilization, blurry pictures will inevitably result in many lighting conditions.
Save your money, wait for image stabilization to make its way into this line of Canon cameras, or check out the many cameras on the market that have this now.


