Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 5D Mark II Body

591 отзывов пользователей о Canon EOS 5D Mark II Body

Странник-3ZHZZ

27.11.2011

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

by itself, the 5d isn't the best choice for video, but with magic lantern firmware, the full size sensor helped us shoot a great video that took place at night in low-light

источник

Аргонавт-6FPMX

28.11.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

All I can say is wow. Huge upgrade from 60D. I love it. Love the full frame. Makes a huge difference for me. Would love to buy a 70-200mm L IS II USM lens next.

источник

Интеллектор-0SOSC

28.11.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This is the best camera I've owned. Great low light performance. At $1,999, you can't go wrong with it. I wished I've got this camera earlier.

источник

Астрономад-5YDEL

10.01.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Look at most of the 3, 2 and 1 star reviews; they all mention Nikon in one way or another. I wonder if they even tried this camera or are standing by and hugging and kissing and sleeping next to their D90 and D3s's and lowering the rating for this beautiful beast. (Note: I am not being biased. I think Nikon makes really wonderful cameras too, though I prefer Canon.)First off, this camera is FAST. It isn't as fast as one of the $5000 professional 1D series cameras, but for half the price, what can you expect? The Mark II is a semi-pro camera that will make an amateur feel like a pro. This camera is fantastic! It's amazingly fast, the ISO performance is staggering, and the full-frame sensor and all 21.1 megapixels of beauty are all you really need to fall in love with this thing over and over again. It pays for itself. There is no price on the shot; if you are debating whether to get this camera or not, I say YES! If you are upgrading from a 5D Mark I, should you upgrade? YES! Are you debating between the 7D and the 5D Mark II? I say to test them both out and see if you prefer the cropped sensor or the full-frame (for me, the full-frame Mark II cannot be beat, though the 7D is also a very nice camera.)Bottom line: just get it.

источник

Сириус-4FPNG

25.07.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I purchased the Canon EOS 5D Mark II 21.1MP Full Frame CMOS Digital SLR Camera with high expectations and Cannon has not only met but surpassed all of them. Previously had a 50D which will now be my backup camera, but it just cannot compare to the 5DM2. I use all L lens and what a beautiful combination when you put the best lens with the camera that was designed to give this kind of performance. I highly recommend this camera to anyone who is serious about photography. I purchased this camera from Amazon and my camera was shipped promptly without a hitch.

источник

Плазмоид-2CYHI

11.08.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

The BAD:Too noisy. Impossible to shoot stills during filming without using a blimp.The GOOD:Stills come out fantastic, but the video:This entire video was shot on the 5D: <...> using 24-105mm L Series and the 70-200mm L series. The camera shoots stunning full HD 1080 progressive 1920x1080. The cinematic shallow depth of field is easily achieved with the focus. The video was shot @24p.

источник

НаноРейдер-0COHG

25.06.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I've been a happy Canon user for years (including a Canon II rangefinder, a Canon EOS 1-V film SLR, and the 5D). I don't often have problems but, when I do, Canon factory service has always been great. The mirror in the 5D recently popped out and, though the camera was out of warranty, they fixed it in a day and fedexed it back to me for no charge. If you're going to spend thousands of dollars on equipment, it's nice to know the manufacturer treats it as important too.

источник

НаноРейдер-6ROKF

08.09.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Anyone who is looking at this camera has probably scoured through the reviews already but here are my two cents. I upgraded from a T1i to this camera. The 5DMKII is significantly heavier than the T1i, especially gripped. The controls are slightly different but intuitive for a previous Canon user. But that's just the small stuff...Most importantly, the low light capability ROCKS! With my T1i, I could go up to ISO800 and maybe ISO1600 with post processing before the photo became unusable. With this camera, I was shooting away at ISO3200 and while there was some noise, it easily went away with a little PP. It takes beautiful photos, even with the 50mm 1.8! I do love the 24-105mm f/4 which I think is a great range to function as a walk about lens. Really, I now feel limited by only my skill. (I'm still an amateur when it comes to dSLRs-I've upgraded quickly!). I'm so happy I upgraded. I have only one complaint and that is with the autofocusing system. I'm not sure if it's just because I'm still learning but I do think it's a little slow and outdated. I wish it had more focus points. Also, I miss having a flash on the camera. I try not to use the on camera flash- I hate flash photography- but sometimes it's needed...I do have a Speedlite but I don't want to have to carry it everywhere!

Overall, I LOVE this camera and I'm so glad I upgraded. I initially choked a little on the price but now I wish I just bit the bullet earlier...

источник

ТерраБот-9IYXA

27.06.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Well this camera rocks shoots low level lighting like it is only its business man shoot at 3200 and nothing but clarity noNoise awesome love the depth of field love. The feel just an all around nice experience,why wait till who knows when for the mkiii. Summer is now buy it now kit is nice get a thosand dollar L lens with it for a fraction of the cost win win scenario..Rogerwilco357Go Blue

источник

Синтрон-0GHLO

10.08.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This camera was a gift for our daughter, who in finishing up her photo journalism major at school. She's already an accomplished photographer and videographer, and this camera will allow her to hopefully begin her professional career.

источник

ТерраБот-2TMBJ

28.08.2010

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I can't say much more than what's already been said however in my arsenal of lenses both Canon and non-Canon, I've found differences in IQ that are now noticeable whereas my 30D could not "see" any differences. Lenses are Canon EF 70-200-mm f4, Canon EF 28-135m f4-f5.6, Sigma 18-50-mm f2.8, Tokina 11-16-mm f2.8. First the Digital Tokina. As expected the vignette is bad at 11mm but at 16mm perfectly acceptable and still sharp. The Sigma is untested at the moment. The Canon EF 28-135-mm is soft at all settings and the Canon EF 70-200-mm is excellent at all zoom ranges. With a trip coming up to California and the Oregon coast I'll have the Canon EF 70-200-mm and the Tokina along and put both to the test. The Sigma I'm guessing may be fine at 50-mm as it shows some softness below f5.6 on my 30D.I'll report back on my successes as well as the not so great successes.Edit December, 2010 In short this is what I've found. Canon 28-135mm Not bad if PP with Photoshop USM and masking in camera raw CS5. Canon 70-200mm still my best lens. Sigma 18-50mm not usable, serious vignette over full range and not used on the trip. Tokina 11-16mm usable at 16mm only with a lot of edge CA and distortion.Edit July 2013:I've caved and purchased a Canon 24-105mm f4L, what a difference from my old 28-135mm. It's now my carry around lens with amazing sharpness compared to my 28-135. Should have done this long ago.

источник

Спектр-9GGLS

11.03.2011

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

This is the first digital camera that I haven't been searching to replace a year later. I bought this the first week it was available, with the lens kit and a 70-200 f/4 L lens and am still happily shooting with no issues whatsoever. The images are crisp and I've submitted to National Geographic. I actually had to send it back to Canon to calibrate the focus after trips to 3 continents and given that it was only a week out of my hands I can't even really complain about that given that the focus is OK now. The resolution is crazy, I can crop 90% and still have great photos. The feel is very solid and heavy and durable compared to my prior Rebel. One of my better Amazon purchases

источник

Гелиос-4VPXD

14.06.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Picture quality is outstanding. What is more important. I have used both L & other Canon Lenses along with a Tokina Macro. All have produced outstanding images.I also used a Nikon d300 but prefer the Canon system as I believe it is more user friendly& faster to use. The new model will probably have a new focus system, this one is fine for me.

источник

Астероид-5CDEU

21.06.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Lots of great reviews here. I love this camera. So expensive though, but it was worth it to me. I'm an amateur but the quality of my pictures knocks me out. Read the pro reviews to get the best description of what this camera can do. I'm "gentle king" on flickr if you want to check out my amateur pictures.

источник

Небулоид-7RFAY

23.01.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought the camera wanting to take the technical limitations out of my photography. My advice for the people who aren't that experienced in photography is to take the lens into consideration - it can add up considerably to the price of the body.I got a midrange priced Canon lens, which I am not happy with. To reach the maximum quality with this camera you need a good lens: the lower the f-number the better the lens. It also helps if you can try the lens out before buying it.My first reaction was happiness over how much clearer the image looked than the ones taken with my old cameras. After the initial excitement wore off I realized the image still wasn't as clear as I had hoped for. A good lens is worth the money you pay. The camera is great but you need a lens that can handle all that greatness.

источник

НеоВояжер-6WPQN

09.06.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I have three Canon Cameras. I started with a 30D and I still have it to use as my version of a point and shoot, then when I got serious I bought a 1D Mark III and was blown away by the speed, flexibility and quality it offers. I still use that camera for sports and outdoor photography. Then I decided to get a portrait camera and although I was tempted to spend the big bucks and get a 1DS III, this camera came out with that same big sensor AND video, which the 1DSIII doesn't even have. Well, the story gets better and better the more I shoot with this camera. The resolution is incredible, the exposure and saturation are consistently excellent and the lack of noise at high ISO is amazing. I have a large format 13x19" printer that I print shots taken from this camera with and all I can say is WOW. When I can print these shots that big and still be amazed at the quality of the picture, that's when I really get excited about this camera. I can shoot at ISO800 and still consider the pictures excellent. I was reminded of how special that is the other day when I had my 1D Mark III and took it indoors at an event, and ran it at ISO800. The noise was so noticeable and I had to really bump up the noise filters during post-processing, but not with the 5D Mark II. I also love the ability to crop down on images much farther than any other camera I have and still have a tack-sharp image that can be printed large format. This is easily my favorite camera. Seriously, the 1D Mark III only comes out for fast action outdoor shooting now. Get one and you'll be so happy you did!

источник

Квантум-8ZXJA

27.04.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I have been using my new camera since Friday (6 days ago) and love the results and ease of use! Live view is a great feature but if you are auto-focusing, hit the button on the top right of the back panel on the camera that says AF-ON before you click the shutter. Full frame is the way to go for professional results! Highly recommended for anyone upgrading from a semi-professional to professional camera.

источник

Астрономад-6LJUP

07.02.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I had a Canon 40D and needed an upgrade. I bought the 5D MKll and instantly fell in love. It is amazing in low light situations. To see some samples please go to my webpage at [...] if you go to the wedding portfolio section mostly all of the low light pictures you see were taken at 1600 ISO on this camera. The images are very crisp! And the color is still preserved. Only con i have is I wish that a camera of this caliper and price was made a little more tougher. When holding it the body feels very plastic-like and just very delicate and not rugged. I am very pleased with the quality images that this camera has produced over the past year. Highly recommend this product!

источник

Кронос-3BFMJ

07.01.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I've tried both the 7D and the 5D mk 2 and found the 5D better. The picture quality of the 7D is excellent but I found the 5D mk 2 better. That full frame sensor make a big difference. On the 7D I found the crop factor somewhat irritating. The 24-105 lens on the 5D make for a great travel lens. Put that same lens on a 7D and you have a 40-170mm lens. Not really useful.Now the 7D has 19 focus points the 5D mk 2 only nine. That is not a problem. The 5D is as fast as the 7D. In fact I got the feeling that the 7D were sometimes confused by all the focus points.Construction both are superb.No pop-up flash on the 5D but I never use a pop-up flash anyway.Both the 7D and 5D are fantastic cameras but the 5D beats it to the finish line

источник

Аэронавт-5HVBU

30.04.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I've only had this 2 days but I am blown away by the image quality. But purchased @ B&H b/c it's only $2,699 there, $300 less than Amazon - if you want it cheaper I believe they still have some in stock. Looking forward to starting my pet photography business with this amazing camera, don't expect I'll have to upgrade for many years!

источник

Странник-9ZMWF

17.03.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I agree with other positive reviews. There is not much to add other than saying that I am completely satisfied with the picture quality. Very well built and responds to my commands effortlessly. Canon EF 24-105L is useful lens that I use most often, but EF 16-35L that I had for some time is so much fun on it. The advantage of full-frame sensor is obvious. If you are after the best possible picture quality in wide range of conditions, you should consider Canon 5D Mark II as an option.

источник

Аэронавт-4LLSP

22.05.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I'm so glad I made the plunge and decided to buy this camera after two years of wanting it. It's everything I hoped for! The video/image quality is outstanding and I'm extremely impressed.

источник

Лунатик-6GQAF

02.06.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Simply said. . . this camera is the best. I don't see anyone whoknows what they are doing, not liking this camera.

источник

Гиперион-5CDEN

14.04.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I love this camera so far.. only bad thing is you can't control the zoom with a remote, other then that its a great camera and we have taken some excellent pictures and the video is great.

источник

Фотон-1YJQL

07.05.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I've had a couple cheaper rebels in the past and jumped up to the 5D II because I was tired of wanting to upgrade and figured I would just do it all in one big leap.I love this camera. I see some people complain about the AF and the points. I don't do studio work and 90% of the time (or more) use the center point anyway, so this might be an issue for some but really has no effect on my use. High ISO is just great compared to the crop frames. I can use my 100-400mm L in many more situations now because of the ISO performance on this camera as that lens needs good light because it is not very fast. 4 frames a sec is perfectly fine for what I do. The camera is large and heavy compared to a Rebel but for a full frame I think it is quite compact and feels great in my hand. I do not mind walking half the day with the 24-70mm f/2.8L mounted. I would recommend getting a hand strap for it though, instead of the neck strap. I got one for around $15 and it works great! The camera is a lot of money for an amateur but I am happy that I have and think I got what I paid for!Some sample pictures that I've taken with the 5D Mark II: click 'all sizes' above the pic for larger sizes.24-70mm f/2.8L, B&W CP[...]24-70mm f/2.8L, B&W 10 stop ND filter[...]24-70mm f/2.8L, B&W 10 stop ND filter[...]135mm f/2L[...]24-70mm f/2.8L, B&W 10 stop ND filter[...]

источник

Спектр-1JEWH

29.03.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I will try and add to the review pool by pointing out the other things that have not been expressed. I will use a comparison: Nikon.I bought the Canon Eos 5D MkII because I got tired of waiting for Nikon to come out with a full-frame body that has at least 20 megapixels, and is reasonably-priced. All that Nikon has at this level are full-frame bodies with only 12 megapixels. Come on! Film's equivalent = 20 to 36 megapixels, not half, which is 12. I don't like being nickel-and-dimed in the megapixel department year after year.The difference between a Canon vs. the comparable Nikon body is that the Nikon's "brain" can adjust the contrast automatically. The Canon body will record what it sees, and you tweak it as a RAW file. That's why a D90's colors looks so much more vivid right out of the camera. Nikon's jpeg images are stunning, while Canon's jpegs are a little drab by comparison. And the Canon...well, again, the images have to be worked up in a digital darkroom to look just as vivid, or low-key or whatever you want to express.Did you know that you can use Nikon, Pentax K-mount, M39 and M42-mount lenses on your Canon? Yes. Search for them here at Amazon.com, or the web!The 5D Mark II shutter is quieter than most Nikon dslr's.Is the Canon 5D MkII equal to the Nikon D3X? Not even close. The 24.5 megapixel D3X is years ahead of its time. The 5D MkII cannot hold a candle to the D3X in terms of overall image quality. Besides, who's got $7000+ laying around?

источник

Альфа-Юнит-0EAJK

03.12.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Absolutely the best camera on the market today! You can spend more than twice the price of 5D Mark II, to buy the top of the line Canon or Nikon, and all you'll get for your money is the same or worst camera with an extra battery. The only things I would change in this camera to improve it are:1. a bit less megapixel to allow for a bigger individual pixel size, which would improve the atmospheric depth of the image and an overall quality of it;2. this camera needs a much-much-much! better auto-focus system for the movie mode.But since you can't have everything, when in doubt, buy 5D Mark II

источник

Сатурниан-7ZLEM

01.02.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I was finally able to upgrade from the 5D to the 5D Mark II and couldn't be more thrilled. As a professional photographer, the high ISO capability alone on this camera is worth the purchase price. Canon continues to prove over and over that they are a premier camera manufacturer and I wouldn't shoot with any other brand.

источник

Астрон-2EGBC

17.02.2011

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

Sony SLR: In body image stabilization that works well (around 2 stop advantage)Olympus SLR: In body image stabilization that works well (around 4 stop advantage)No In-body image stabilization like Sony & OlympusNo Tilt & Swivel LCDNo 1080p HD video recording 60 fps

источник

Астрон-1MNFC

05.09.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I purchased this for low light situations with out the flash and the typical indoor poor lighting issues. Overall it performed well. I was able to get the pix. In a hotel with mixed light the colors are very yellow. In the low light the colors seemed to red. Photo Shop fixed the red; but didn't help much in the yellow photo's. I'd expect to NOT have to use PS to much with this kind of camera. I didn't have a lot of time to 'practice' with this before I needed it for this occasion. All the buttons are different than my xti; so I used auto to much. IT CHOSE to use the 2.8 part of my lens; so many pix are still blurry outside of what I was focused on. MY mistake. NEXT TIME I'll know to use manual or how to compensate better. I think once I learn the camera it's going to be the wisest camera choice I've made!!!

источник

Гелиос-3NBTE

18.11.2010

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

This camera is all it's advertised to be. But as expensive as it is, it does not offer the feature found in less expensive brands and Nikon, the ability to take in one burst exposures to make a good HDR photograph. Some Nikon models take up to 9 exposures with one click.Canon offers the long standing 3 exposure bracketing, and only the feature mentioned above, on their most expensive model. To take multiple bracketing shot is slow and doesn't work if there is movement in the scene. AT the price of a 5D Mark II this feature should be included.

источник

Альфа-Юнит-2IDGC

20.09.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

GREAT CAMERA! Full frame is everything they proclaim it to be. It is great for cropping because the field of view is much larger and the images are sharper. The ISO range offers bright, sharp images in dark situations with relatively little noise. The colors are correct every time. My lenses work so much better on this camera as well. The video recording, rear LCD focus and HDMI hookups are all pluses. Overall the camera is great to work with. Lots of pros on this camera, lots of learning, and lots of fun! The only con I have at the moment is the loud shutter noise it makes while shooting, but its the sound of greatness.

источник

НаноРейдер-2WLOJ

04.01.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This camera is very well rounded, crisp images through low levels of light to high. The size is the size, it's a professional DSLR, what do you expect? All in all, very happy with my new purchase.

источник

Странник-2JCXV

06.05.2010

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

After several years of reliable service from my old Canon EOS Rebel body, I was ready to move up to a "pro level" body when the 5D Mk II came out. I was one of the first photographers on Maui to buy the Mk II and I was REALLY looking forward to the overall measurably better picture quality promised by Canon and the indie reviews. After a couple of months of testing and comparisons with my old Canon body, I was VERY disappointed with the 5D MkII's output: EVERY PHOTO I TOOK, regardless of mode (AF and MF), turned out to be poorly focused, so much so that I couldn't even compensate for it in Photoshop. MY old Rebel EOS body (less than half the body-only price) produces much CLEARER images. I went back to using the older body and am returning the 5D MkII to the retailer for either a trade-in or heavy service work to correct whatever the problem is with the optics. My advice: If you absolutely MUST have one of these beasts, test drive it by viewing a few full-size images on-screen. You may be sorry otherwise.

источник

Астрономад-9EHCK

11.12.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

So far, this camera has exceeded my expectations although I have owned it for only less than one month. My previous camera was a Canon 50D and what a difference! Picture quality (with equally exceptional lenses, of course) is impressive!

источник

ОмниКод-3HZMP

13.10.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

There is a lot to love about this camera; Full Frame, 21.1 MP, HD Video capable, High ISO etc...But what I also love about it is the quality and reproduction of colors on even "so so" lenses.I moved from Nikon D300 to this Canon and I am completely happy with the decision. The learning curve for this camera is much shorter than the Nikon. Nikon wins in the fast focus and it is a very good camera but the Canon 5d MK II is simply awesome.

источник

Кварковец-6IMCA

18.11.2010

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I also bought the Canon 5D mark 2, had the same problem with the focus plate falling into the mirrors and blurred photo's. I returned and ordered a second one and had the exact same problem. Canon claims it is part of the design!

источник

НоваГость-6YKOD

10.10.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Excellent camera and can't wait to increase my lens library. Shot some shots under low light and can't believe the image quality even at low light. Love playing around with the settings. Camera came in a few days and I was happy to have received it through Amazon. Gave me extra confidence in buying rather than getting from the New York scammer sites.

источник

Квазар-0XOSG

25.06.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I am a serious demo person when i want to purchase a piece of gear at this price i need to know if it's gonna fit the bill, so i make sure i do dura-testing on the product before i seal the deal... and i owned the 7D for a minute it was a sturdy camera i like the 8 fps a whole lot and the 60fps which was a deal helper, which was hard of letting go once i decided to go with the 5D mk2 so full frame beat the APS-c sensor anyday... it really helps when using L series or nice primes... this thing rocks when shooting.7D has a dual processor which is good cause you can shoot video for 30min instead of 12min, also when shooting at the 8fps it buffers faster so significant differences. but still doesn't beat FF. LOL

источник

Аргонавт-0EZWZ

04.10.2010

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

A Full Frame camera a few steps above the Canon 50D. The controls are almost completely similiar to the 50D yet different then the 7D. Excellent for still shots but the 7D is better for action shots due to its more frames per second. I have both cameras and love them both. Each has its own purpose. If you ever owned a 50D, this is a much better camera by far.

источник

Астероид-1EFNA

28.09.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

i am constantly amazed by the pictures i get from this camera. i love the extra width i get from full frame as well as the extra shallow depth of field. i'm a wedding/portrait photographer and this camera is beyond amazing for what i do.if you shoot high ISO, you can't beat this camera at the moment. i shoot ISO 6400 like it's ISO 1600, it is that clean. and ISO 3200 is the new ISO 800 for me, i don't even hesitate. i will not go above ISO 6400 though as you'll start to see banding.the lcd has me spoiled, so much so that i'm selling my 40d so that i can either get a 50d or the new 7d. on the 40d all of the pictures just look blah...and blurry. they still turn out good on the computer, but it can be very frustrating at the time. on the 5d II, you can tell right away if you've misfocused or if your exposure is off.video quality is amazing though i don't really use it for that.autofocus is better than people like to give it credit for. i shoot mainly dimly lit receptions and it locks perfect whenever i need it to. i'm talking ISO 6400 f/1.6 1/30s dim. also i have no problem using outer focus points as they work great as well.manual focus is a cinch with the 5d II. if you put the camera in live view, move the small box over what you want to focus on, then push the zoom button twice to see that box at pixel level. focus the lens and shoot away.lenses used are 35mm f/1.4L, 85mm f/1.8, 16-35mm f/2.8L I, and 70-200mm f/2.8L IS.if you need high ISO and want full frame, this is the camera for you. if you don't need either, save some money and get the 50d or 7d...or even a used 40d.

источник

Аэронавт-2WRIZ

22.06.2010

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I have done photography in the past with High Quality Canon film cameras and lenses for magazines. I decided to get back into photography and purchase the Canon D5 Mark ll. I found the camera Large, Heavy, Over Priced, and the Quality of the photos taken at 21.1 mega pix was poor and darker than at a normal photo would be taken in auto mode. My 10year old Sony 5.0 mega pix takes better photos.This Camera is not for a person that is a beginner or not knowledgeable in Photography. The HD video is good quality, however unless you use a Tripod or compensating lense, the video is shakey on playback.I was very disappointed in this camera.

источник

Нейрон-5IDUP

17.04.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

LOVE THIS CAMERA. IS EVERYTHING I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE AND MUCH MORE. MY IMAGES ARE SPECTACULAR EVERYWHERE I GO, AND IT IS SO EASY AFTER HAVING MY "BEGINNING TRAINING" IN A CANON REBEL XTI WHICH I GOT YEARS AGO. 4105 LENS IS AWESOME.AND IT CAME TO MY DOOR IN LITTLE TOWN MIDDLE OF NOWHERE IN 21 HOURS AFTER I ORDERED IT. IF YOU DO ORDER A CAMERA FROM AMAZON AND THEY GIVE YOU A LIST OF ACCESSORIES, BE CERTAIN THEY FIT THE SIZE OF YOUR LENS. I BOUGHT A LENS THAT WAS OE THE LIST AND IT WAS WRONG SIZE DUE TO MY IGNORANCE AND SPPED OF ORDERING. I HAD ORDERED A 7 D FROM ANOTHER CAMERA DISTRIBUTOR AND SENT IT BACK AFTER 2 DAYS. AND ORDERED THIS ONE FROM AMAZON BECAUSE THEY WERE SO SPEEDY AND I HAD TO LEAVE ON TRIP IN TWO DAYS.SO HAD GREAT PHOTO TRIP OVER 2400 PHOTOS IN 3 WEEKS EVEN WITHOUT MY UV FILTER.

источник

Лунатик-1BPBQ

16.10.2009

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

The Canon 5D Mark II really hits a new portion of the market- it's really a professional level DSLR at a price accessible to shutterbugs, photography enthusiasts, and independent filmmakers. The camera features an incredible Full Frame CMOS sensor that does very well in low light...this sensor is, in fact, larger than that of the Red One 4K Cinema camera, which costs approximately $17,000 (please note that I am not comparing these two cameras- they really do serve two VERY different purposes).Canon really made a step in the right direction with this camera. It provides quality, functionality, ease of use, and the accessibility of professional level products to those with shallower pockets. This camera has been great for everything from candid family shots, to shooting great videos of trips to Europe, family gathers, etc.While the still photos are incredible and the video rivals that of exponentially more expensive HD cameras, the only things keeping this camera from being much better with video is the processor and the write speed. I think we can, however, expect to see Canon focus on this in the near future. They do provide great user requested features in their firmware updates, which is more than can be said by most prosumer/professional electronics manafacturers.I would absolutely recommend this camera to anyone who is looking for a camera that does it all without having to cost more than the car they drive.

источник

Сатурниан-2KGGC

26.12.2009

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

If you've made it this far you're basically looking for encouragement to buy this camera - not for actual information. I can offer encouragement.

I've been a working professional for my entire life and have spent fortunes on gear. I own a complete Hasselblad H3DII system and that system was so good I sold my entire backup Canon EOS 1Ds MkII system since it simply wasn't good enough for ad campaigns. This camera still isn't as good as the Hasselblad but it's close - close enough that I use it a lot. The video function however puts it in another realm altogether. It's got issues with sound but as I make my transition to moving images this camera is helping the process. The camera needs manual level controls for the audio and it needs firewire for shooting tethered - USB is so slow it's worthless. Those are my complaints.

I consider it my Hasselblad point and shoot. Good enough for print work and cheap enough to replace when it get's smashed. I did a two week off road motorcycle trip in Canada and the camera was dropped, mounted to the motorcycle, used in pouring rain and whipping dust storms - things I'd never do with the Hasselblad. It didn't miss a beat.

источник

Астероид-6EWXM

27.08.2010

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

The major complaint I have despite all the great values :1) The focusing is just bad/ if you have tried 7d, you will see a huge difference2) I wish the ISO performance will be improved in the next model3) auto focusing in video is non-existent4) not very weather sealingThen I pretty much agree with all the good things about this camera!!!!

источник

НаноРейдер-5ZLLR

02.12.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I finally gave up on film, reluctantly, like the old guy that I am, surrendering my Nikon after playing with my brother's Canon 5D. The 5D Mk II is an amazing camera, and if there were ever a question about digital having finally surpassed film, the answer is in. The images are crisp and gorgeous, and the camera has all the flexibility anyone could every hope for, and then some. The controls quickly become familiar and convenient, and the low-light sensitivity is astounding.That having been said, there are some notes I would make. It is built like a tank, and when matched with an "L"-series lens like the 24-70mm or 70-200mm is significant in its mass. In addition, the video images, though beautiful, must be further processed before they can be used in many video-editing programs (I use Vegas Pro 8.1), and I ended up having to purchase CineForm's NeoScene at about $100 to make them usable. It almost seemed as though Canon's video people weren't consulted fully on the video part of the camera. Again, however, great images are obtained once properly dealt with.I am sure that in the near future, an even more amazing camera will be sold; for me, this thing is perfect, even though I had to trade with my wife big time to purchase it.

источник

НеоВояжер-7NXNZ

19.04.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I have owned the Canon 5D Mark II for over two months now and it is an amazing camera body. The HD video is fantastic.Pros:Amazing low light capabilities.Simple and intuitive menu system.Comfortable ergonomic design.Light weight.Film quality 1080P HD video.Breathtaking quality resolution.Cons:Uber expensive.Subpar autofocusing.Full frame sensor will always have numberous 'hot' pixels.Hot pixels show up in HD video and are impossible to remove without expensive post processing software.Need expensive L series lenses to really capture great images.Huge RAW files take up tons of hard drive space and require a bleeding edge workstation to edit in an efficient manner.Uber expensive.

источник

• «
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• 11
• 12
• 13
• 14
• »