Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 5D Mark II Body
590 отзывов пользователей o Canon EOS 5D Mark II Body
Пользовались
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Body?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Coming from the 60D (which is a stellar camera in its own right), I was blown away by this cameras Image Quality. With the 60D I found I could only use 50% crops for critical work. With the 5D Mark II, I found 100% crops were so detailed I could use them no problem. Additionally the low light capability wipes the floor with the 60D. The differences are night and day. With the 60D I would see noise creeping in at around 800 or so ISO. 1600 was the max I felt comfortable shooting in, with 3200 requiring heavy use of noise reduction software resulting in much less detail. With the 5D Mark 2 ISO 3200 is much better than the 60D's 1600 ISO. I can actually shoot at 6400 for less critical work and it looks much better than the 60D at 3200. The retention of detail and the way the camera squashes noise is very impressive. If you have the coin this camera is a rock star. However! The 5D Mark III is set to be announced on Feb 28th 2012 or within the week of Feb 28th 2012, so you may want to hold off and grab this sucker at a steal of a price. If you need the camera now, you wont be disappointed. Another thing to note.
Auto Focus:
I've read a lot of people complaining that this camera only has 1 cross type focus point. I want to say that most people use the center focus point anyway, so it really is a bit of an overblown issue.
Canon vs Nikon:
The D700 has better focusing. But unless you're doing sports this is a non issue. The low light is better than the Canon, but you only have 12.1 megapixels. It BETTER have better low light capabilities than the 5D Mark II. But honestly, at only 1/3rd of a stop better in low light giving up around 2x the resolution seems a bit silly. It is argued that the only time you will need the extra resolution is when printing billboard sized images. This does not factor in cropping at all. If you want to crop your 5d Mark II image to say 100% you can do that while maintaining stellar levels of detail. With the D700 you're left with a lot left detail. Another thing any prospective buyer should do is look at the prices and quality of their potential lenses. I would start at the 24-70, then the 70-200 to cover your zoom range. The canons being cheaper and the 70-200 IS II being MUCH better (probably the best lens on the market) Then compare primes, the Cannon has the 85 1.2 V2 vs the Nikkor.... 85 1.4? You can't find a Nikkor 1.2 and the Canon 1.2 is only ~$100 more than the 1.4 Nikkor. The canon has a 50 1.2 the Nikon has a 50 1.4. Again Nikkor doesn't even have a 1.2 lens.
One last thing about Nikon vs Canon. Movie mode. I know I know, but if you EVER want to record a movie, EVER, you cannot on a D700 and you get commercial level videos on the 5D Mark II. Not just adequate movies, but box office quality movies. That's a MASSIVE!!!! improvement.
I know a lot of people were initially disappointed that it did not have the headline grabbing specifications of the Nikon D800 but on closer inspection the changes are all that we really required.
In particular the AF system has been improved out of all recognition but then let's face it you could not get worse than 9 points with just one cross type point. The new system locks focus instantly even in the dimmest of light and it tracks objects as they move across the screen flawlessly. You can also set up different focus set ups for portrait and landscape just as you can in the 7D - that is very useful.
Other worthwhile improvements come in the speed that the camera achieves. Although I never found the MkII sluggish, the MkIII just feels snappier. I'm not a machine gun shooter so the increased frame rate is not important but the speed it writes to the card is. The DIGIC 5+ processor really is faster than the old DIGIC 4 it replaced just as Canon claim.
The addition of a second card slot is a great benefit. Although I have never had a card fail, I know plenty who have so the ability to record to two cards is good insurance.
The ability to shoot at even higher ISO speeds than with the MkII and still get clean results is a huge bonus to those like me who prefer natural light to flash.
There are also other subtle improvements like the lock on the mode dial, the quick menu button, a larger viewing screen which matches the normal format, 100% viewfinder and the start stop button for video.
Put these things together and they make the upgrade worthwhile.
UPDATE 5 weeks on and less than 700 pictures taken, the camera has developed Error 30 which means the shutter is stuck and needs replacing. Since it is outside the 30 days, I do not qualify for a replacement so will have to send it off to Canon for repair.
I'll compare what upgrading from the "beginner's DLSR" to this semipro/pro body, using casual language since I'm nowhere near being a pro, but take my photography seriously as a hobby.
Size & Weight
- The 5d markii is significantly bigger all around. The weight is more substantial and the materials used seem more sturdy and solid. The xti looks almost like a toy compared to the 5dmarkii. Don't let this size scare you away, I see many of people traveling with the 5d body or 7d/60d which are about the same size, and the feeling of the camera is just very nice to hold.
Crop vs. zoom
- It has taken me quite some time to learn how the crop factor on the XTI affects the image vs. the full frame. I'm currently shooting with the same 28-135mm lens, and the same lens on the 5d body is significantly wider. What I mean by this is you get much more of what you are looking at on the view finder without having to step backwards to fit more into the frame. (After using the xti for so long, I hate to think of how much I have missed out on my images without the full frame.
Speed
- The sound and speed of the shutter are different on this camera. The shutter sounds a bit more violent, but the speed in between exposures is quite noticeable. I recently took some outside photos of my 3 year old niece and I was able to get much more of her facial expressions just using the single shot mode and still got more shots in than before.
Camera bag
- if you have a small camera bag (single dslr) for an xti sized body, you will likely need to upgrade your bag since the body and eventually, the lens you attach will no longer fit.
Image quality and size
The full frame camera and bump of 20 mb per image are huge when you want to crop and zoom and still be able to print out a clear image. Graininess is less when you look closer at the image, but I'm sure that will improve even more after I purchase a 28-70mm f2.8 L lens.
Menus & wheel
If you are a pretty seasoned user of the XTI style menus, the 5D MKII menus did not take very long to figure out. The wheel does make scrolling through menus and thumbnails easier. The exposure and focus point buttons are still taking some time to get used to (position on the body wise)
LCD screen
This has a beautiful screen attached and you can truly see what the image will look like when you get home and on your actual computer monitor. The colors are more rich and deep in color. The screen is bright and very clear.
Video
Have not taken a lot of video on this body yet, but I did notice you can't have IS switched on while filming, otherwise, you hear the motor running in the video.
Summary
If you can afford a body of this caliber, take your photography seriously, and value the people or things you are taking pictures of, I think that alone is worth the $. Time and again, I wish I had a better camera body to capture those moments like birthdays and be able to print or send large images of the moments. Having that option is fantastic.






