Отзывы о Жесткий диск Western Digital WD Re 1 ТБ WD1003FBYX
 | Жесткий диск Western Digital WD Re 1 ТБ WD1003FBYX | Яндекс Маркет | 9 916 ₽ | Посмотреть |
 | Жесткий диск Western Digital WD Re 1 ТБ WD1003FBYX | Яндекс Маркет | 14 255 ₽ | Посмотреть |
233 отзывов пользователей o Western Digital WD Re 1 ТБ WD1003FBYX
Пользовались
Western Digital WD Re 1 ТБ WD1003FBYX?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Плазмонавт-6HHIO
15.05.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Western Digital RE4 drives are the best bang for your buck regardless of capacity period! When I build a desktop computer, and I have built many, I utilize WD RE4 drives exclusively. Enterprise class drives just can't be beat. The 5 year warranty speaks for itself. The only way I could be made happier would be if Western Digital would make a 6Gb version. These 3Gb drives, when utilized as primary drives, boot quickly with their 64MB of cache and I have yet to receive a DOA unit when bought through Amazon.
Пульсар-7JNRW
22.08.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I bought two of these Western Digital RE4 WD2003FYYS 2 TB 64-meg cache drives for use in a quad-processor desktop PC with a Raid 1 configuration, 4-gigs of memory, running Windows 7 (32-bit). When the drives arrived, one was working and the other one had numerous bad sector errors (according to WD's drive evaluation DOS utility). Both had been well-packed for shipment: each OEM drive was packed in foam in it's own box, and then each of those boxes were surrounded by bubble-wrap and then packed in another carton. Since these were supposed to have been ultra-reliable "enterprise-class" drives, a failure rate of 50% wasn't what I had expected. RMAed both of the drives and instead bought two WD1002FBYS RE3 1 TB 32-meg cache drives. The RE3 drives have been working fine since installed.On a more positive note, when tested against my 3-year old Hitachi HDP7250GLA 500 GB drives with a 16-meg cache, the WD2003FYYS drives (in a Raid 1 configuration on my system) had a 90% faster average access time (19.8 for the Hitachi HDP7250GLA vs. 10.4 for the WD2003FYYS). Most of that difference likely due to the 16-meg vs. 64-meg disk cache -- along with improvements in hard drive technology over a period of 3 years. Comparing the RE4 WD2003FYYS to the RE3 WD1002FBYS drives, the WD1002FBYS drives' average access time is about 18% slower -- although still 56% faster than the two older-model Hitachi's that they replaced.
Квантум-6UBXD
26.06.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I purchased four of these drives for use in a Thecus N4200 NAS. All four of them are working without any problems to date (purchased in December 2010). I chose these drives because of the support for RAID configurations and the 5-year warranty. The NAS is used for backup purposes only but I wanted decent performance and reliability. So far, I have both.
Квантум-4SZZT
26.06.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I purchased four of these drives for use in a Thecus N4200 NAS. All four of them are working without any problems to date (purchased in December 2010). I chose these drives because of the support for RAID configurations and the 5-year warranty. The NAS is used for backup purposes only but I wanted decent performance and reliability. So far, I have both.
Астероид-6YHNG
10.06.2011
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
This is the 2nd time in 3days i have had to return a drive back to Amazon and WD.Had a really bad week.Apart from the frustration involved waiting for a return and a refund... the working one a solid and fast drive.Only time will tell if this one dies before i receive my RMAWestern Digital 500 GB RE4 SATA 3 Gb/s 7200 RPM 64 MB Cache Bulk/OEM Enterprise Hard Drive - WD5003ABYX
НоваГость-4CJCV
29.01.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this to replace a Seagate backup drive that lacked enough room for drive images. The WD5003 is quiet and speedy and comes with a 5-year Enterprise warranty. No problems with it at all.Buyers have been complaining about Amazon's poor bare-drive packaging in many of the reviews I've read. However, this drive was packaged properly in a box of its own made by WD, with plastic end caps suspending the drive over the bottom of the box. This package was put in another box with the rest of the items I ordered and a couple of air pillows. Perhaps Amazon has listened to the well-founded complaints and revised their bare-drive shipping accordingly. Then again, it might only apply to this particular hard drive.
Плазмоид-9XJLX
29.01.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this to replace a Seagate backup drive that lacked enough room for drive images. The WD5003 is quiet and speedy and comes with a 5-year Enterprise warranty. No problems with it at all.Buyers have been complaining about Amazon's poor bare-drive packaging in many of the reviews I've read. However, this drive was packaged properly in a box of its own made by WD, with plastic end caps suspending the drive over the bottom of the box. This package was put in another box with the rest of the items I ordered and a couple of air pillows. Perhaps Amazon has listened to the well-founded complaints and revised their bare-drive shipping accordingly. Then again, it might only apply to this particular hard drive.
Астрон-7VCWA
14.05.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Installed in my Mac Pro 2008. Cloned my boot drive to it an have been using full time for a week. Drive is silent (really I can't hear anything even if I put my ear to the computer case.) It is faster than the WD Blue that came OE with the Mac. It just works flawlessly. Nothing more to say. Anything different happens I will update my review.
Кронос-0XBCN
20.03.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I will second P. Levine's positive review on the packaging. Mine was identically packed and included being in a sealed antistatic bag. Looks like it's not a fluke. Online vendor packaging is frequently so bad that I believe the 10% plus DOA or early death rate for drives is due to this issue. Kudos to Amazon.About the drive. It's fast and very quiet. No issues. The RE4 is an Enterprise quality drive and per WD, each is burned-in before shipping. I'm happy to trade a few more bucks to reduce the chance of HD failure.
Эксопилот-0SFZE
10.06.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm using two of this babies with a Linksys NAS200, Mirroring with Journaling.This is a quiet HardDisk, and so far all good and happy
Сириус-9SSZQ
16.04.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Just installed it and check enitre disk for errors -- none found -- just what I would expect from a premium-priced hard drive. If you don't hear back from my it is safe to assume it is continuing to work well.
Небулоид-1HUDO
06.04.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
If your enterprise data is valuable to you, then these are the drives to get. Much more expensive than the consumer versions, but when reliability is a must, these are the drives to get.
Альфа-Юнит-0JYGX
24.02.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Personally, I bought this drive simply becuase the client wanted the enterprise 5 year warranty. I didn't use it in a raid application, but am thouroughly pleased with simple IDE usage. Not even running AHCI on it. Just keeps it simpler.
Кварковец-0LGPF
05.03.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The fastest drive on the market with a motor. It works great for video projects and music production. This unit is more expensive than all other drives in its class, but for a reason.
Вектрон-9IAIX
23.03.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was skeptical at first.But I bought two, and put in a RAID1 mirror config, in a 8-drive raid box with 2 x multilane infiniband interfaces and a RocketRaid card.The 64MB cache is noticeable, totally. It is not hype. On average, I get 100MB/sec copying across a gigabit network in the LAN from one machine to this RAID volume. In a similar test (using the same source machine, to a volume of 750GB AAKS', I get ~82MB/sec across the wire. Again, the cache is noticeable in my tests.I am amazed at the quality of this drive.I recommend these drives to anyone who needs to use a RAID config, and needs capacity, and reliability.I only use WD, period.I currently own 46 hard drives, all WD.The only WD hard drive I ever had fail, was a green 750GB one.The older AAKS series was phenomenal, and these are the new ones to get!(I have had drives fail a great deal using other manufacturers)appdevman
Туманник-9SIBF
23.03.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was skeptical at first.But I bought two, and put in a RAID1 mirror config, in a 8-drive raid box with 2 x multilane infiniband interfaces and a RocketRaid card.The 64MB cache is noticeable, totally. It is not hype. On average, I get 100MB/sec copying across a gigabit network in the LAN from one machine to this RAID volume. In a similar test (using the same source machine, to a volume of 750GB AAKS', I get ~82MB/sec across the wire. Again, the cache is noticeable in my tests.I am amazed at the quality of this drive.I recommend these drives to anyone who needs to use a RAID config, and needs capacity, and reliability.I only use WD, period.I currently own 46 hard drives, all WD.The only WD hard drive I ever had fail, was a green 750GB one.The older AAKS series was phenomenal, and these are the new ones to get!(I have had drives fail a great deal using other manufacturers)appdevman
Фотон-0ZSQO
11.07.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this drive because I believe it to be the best in terms of reliability and performance. So far, so good...
Показаны отзывы 217-233 из 233.
