Отзывы о Жесткий диск Western Digital 1 ТБ WD1001FALS
497 отзывов пользователей o Western Digital 1 ТБ WD1001FALS
Пользовались
Western Digital 1 ТБ WD1001FALS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Klaus-Tannenberg
16.06.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Скорость, быстрая работа с тысячами мелких файлов, объем. Не очень сильно греется (но охлаждение лучше прикрутить)
- - Хрустит... это он чипсы есть наверное, при просмотре фильмов или играх не слышно...
Весьма хороший винчестер, до этого не было опыта использования террабайтников, но этот меня не разочаровал, несмотря на то что на винты более 500 гигабайт...
Скроменый эксперт
24.09.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Очень быстрый, самый быстрый из всех терабайтников после WD RE3. В компе стоит 8 штук RE3 и 4 этих винта. Шум в пределах нормы. Хороший...
Зайцев Денис
08.08.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Очень шустрый, не горячий и надежный винт. Скорость очень нравится. Отлично работает с папками с кучей картинок или других мелких...
spitfire-che
18.05.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Быстрый, супернадёжный, как все WD, ну и, конечно же, Объём! Именно с большой буквы.
- - Отсутсвуют. Кто-то считает его шумным - не знаю... Не шумный он. Обычный. За шумом ATI 4850 и пропеллеров вообще безразлично.
Очень хороший жёсткий. Быстрая и качественная чёрная икра. Температура в районе 34 градусов (немного обдувается косвенно, с бокового вентилятора). Так что вообще отличный винчестер.
mehan0id
09.07.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Высокая надежность, хорошие скоростные показатели
- - цена высоковата
Отличный выбор для тех, кто печется...
a-2x
21.03.2009
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Быстрый, объёмный
- - Шумный
Диск хорош, только шумит как пылесос. Это не брак, это действительно заявленные тех. характеристики (24-33 dBA).
Лучше берите WD Green Power и не ошибётесь. Он намного тише, экономичнее и по производительности...
Лучше берите WD Green Power и не ошибётесь. Он намного тише, экономичнее и по производительности...
Капитонов Андрей
26.03.2009
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Быстрый, не особено громкий и конечно объемный!
- - Я бы их не заметил, если бы данный винчестер не проработал у меня менее 4 месяцев и внезапно появились BAD блоки в первом...
Матыжонок Виктор
24.05.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Быстрый, тихий.
- - не удалось подсоединить к RAID-контроллеру SIL 3114 SATARaid
Скроменый эксперт
07.04.2009
1/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Нет
- - Работа не громкая, но "хруст" при его работе сильно напрягает.
В режиме ожидания он не шумит, а вот при копировании, загрузке ОС и т.п. действиях связаных с нагрузкой на винт, шум выражающийся "хрустом" очень сильно напрягает. Терпеть не могу "хрустящие" винты.
Arsenov Dmitry
14.03.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + высокая скорость
Просто отличный винчестер после старенького самсунга. Просто тихоня по сравнению с ним - за кулерами...
Скроменый эксперт
28.03.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Все работает как должно работать.
- - Чуть шумноват, ночью посвистывает:-)
Итого: гуд.
Скроменый эксперт
15.01.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
WARNING: in certain RAID configurations these WD desktop series drives will frequently get flagged FAILED due to Western Digital - specific issue with TLER setting causing conflict as to whether error handling should be undertaken by the hard drive or by the RAID controller. Please parse search string "TLER" on Wikipedia for more information. Parse words like "TLER locked raid failure" (without quotes) into Google and it will return countless links to PC forum threads on this matter.Yes, I do acknowledge Western Digital, like most HDD manufacturers, does NOT endorse their desktop (non "enterprise") series drives such as the Caviar Blacks for use in RAID configurations. For RAID use, they assume the HDD will see heavy duty cycle in an "enterprise" (file server, or similar) environment, so for RAID use they push you to their much HIGHER COST drives on basis they have designed those with higher reliability (such as improved MTBF) required for enterprise duty cycles. However, home PC "enthusiasts" have generally had no significant reliability problems in using desktop series drives (from other manufactures!) to create RAIDs for typical home PC environment - assuming here home use means a VERY LOW DUTY CYCLE compared to an "enterprise" (file server, or similar) 24x7 environment.However, Western Digital has now moved from merely "advising against" to now somewhat maliciously LOCKING the TLER feature as DISABLED making the HDD INCOMPATIBLE (= very unreliable) when used in certain RAID configurations. They did this to FORCE you to use only their expensive enterprise series drives for any RAID.Western Digital burned us, sometime in late 2009, when they abruptly changed the firmware so that all versions of these drives now shipping have the Time-Limited Error Recovery (TLER) setting permanently LOCKED with TLER READ and TLER WRITE both set as DISABLED, so the WDTLER.EXE utility no longer works to toggle TLER to ENABLED. In order to use these drives in a RAID you want to set TLER to ENABLED, but you can no longer do that by any method.Western Digital never warned anyone of that firmware change, and doesn't even include a packing slip with the drive warning us these drives can no longer be used in RAID.If you dig and dig, you'll eventually find buried in obscure area of the WD website their warning:"Western Digital manufactures desktop edition hard drives and RAID Edition hard drives. Each type of hard drive is designed to work specifically in either a desktop computer environment or a demanding enterprise environment. If you install and use a desktop edition hard drive connected to a RAID controller, the drive may not work correctly...."This is reported to affect ALL of their desktop series drives (shipping late 2009, or later).With my PC, the frequency at which these drives would get dropped from my RAID was also influenced by my operating system setup. Initially, I configured my RAID using motherboard-based Intel® X58 / ICH10R with Intel Matrix Storage Manager; however, the problem was NOT that I was using such a "software motherboard-based" RAID. Apparently what made the Caviar Blacks drop from the RAID on a weekly basis was that for unrelated reasons, I had installed Vista 64-bit with a Mandarin language support configuration that for some reason prevented certain key MS updates from installing.When I did properly reload Vista so it picked up all the key updates, then the frequency of dropped drives was much lower (less then once a month) for Caviar Blacks. Plus I soon went to Windows 7 64-bit. Still there were dropped drives.So now I'll tell what completely eliminated issue of RAID mistakenly marking HDD's as FAILED due to this TLER error handling conflict:SOLUTION: I replaced all my desktop series Western Digital Caviar Blacks with Hitachi's desktop series Deskstar 7K3000, choosing the 2TB model of the 7K3000 series : HDS723020BLA642. Problem solved.And for you RAID purists who are going to flame me for using software-based RAID: yes I did eventually reconfigure for hardware RAID, in my case buying the LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-8iIn closing, I'll share a very surprising Lessons-Learned I experienced in web-researching HDD reliability: the perception of HDD reliability versus manufacturer you'll get from a SURFACE browse through web forums is nearly OPPOSITE of what you'll learn from a very thorough fact-based read of objective reports on this subject.THIS is the kind of study you should read: [...]Yes, that's just one data point, but it is a VALUABLE data point because of the large sample size set of field return data. Next go surf the web and find another half dozen real world large sample studies just like that. That's what I did. What you'll find are strong CONSISITENCIES between completely unrelated independant studies in terms of how they ranked HDD manufacturers on actual real world use HDD failure rates. You parse those consistencies across those large sample studies, now you are finally cutting through the
Скроменый эксперт
26.07.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
UPDATE August, 2010:I am amending my review for the WD Black 1TB 32MB Cache "Firmware Rev 05.00K05" HD's tonight because I've been quietly buying masses of them from Amazon.com, a total of 60+ of them through my account and my company account since I wrote this review, into August 2010, and the packaging at Amazon.com has improved 100% in the past year, so much so that all recent HD's have been sent in new, clean, strong HD-specific boxes with "T-Mount Fittings" for HD suspension, a box within a box, with air bladders, without fail in all my recent shipments. This adequately packages the HD's for transport, and I see no reason to continue to call Amazon.com down on its shipping practices for OEM HD's, as they have learned their lessons well it turns out and remedied the shipping problems with their OEM HD's 100% in 2010.This isn't to say things couldn't be improved because they can be improved: Amazon.com could use foam inserts in the boxes to protect against static electricity and other impact damages which the hard cardboard mounting doesn't protect against, so please take note of that idea also...it is encouraging to see the good packaging, however, with all recent Western Digital Black 1TB HD shipments, and Amazon.com is to be commended for changing its ways and trying to do the customer right with adequate packing for all HD shipments in 2010, at least with my accounts it's improved to this status. This should be noted by people reading this review and others that were critical of Amazon.com packaging of OEM HD's in the past, especially 2009, a year where Amazon.com didn't fare well with criticism from most customers about their OEM HD packaging and protection during shipments.In addition there has been a post above where one person is commenting about WD changing the firmware in the OEM WD Black HD's to make them incompatible with RAID use, and that is patently false, and is NOT TO BE BELIEVED! All WD Black 1TB HD's that I have been purchasing this year, and last year, are 100% compatible with RAID arrays, any sort of RAID array, and with hardware RAID controller use, as I have built many systems this year utilizing WD Black OEM 1TB RAID setups, with and without hardware RAID controllers, and they are 100% compatible, no disclaimers necessary at all for that fact, and any claim to the contrary cannot be believed. PROVE IT TO ME if you want to publish such commentary, because up to now that whole idea is just plain uninformed, misconceived thinking, and it needs to be taken down from this web site because people will believe stupid claims like that, given the chance.Wavey Davey - August 23, 2010____ _____ _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___I have been waiting to review my six (6) WD Black 1TB 32MB Cache SATA 2 HD's because I wanted to establish a track record with them, a baseline, since I am using them in two distinctly different RAID mediums. In any case, the SATA HD's are working fantastic in RAID 5 and RAID 0 for me and my newest PC build. Let me digress a little and I'll rate the HD's after I tell you how I am using them.I have four (4) in a FirmTek SeriTek 2eEN4 4-Bay HotSwap RAID Enclosure as my primary "write-to" HD system for video and sound projects, in a RAID 5, so total space available in RAID 5 is 3TB. A RAID 5 uses speed and redundancy so it's an ideal medium for film or audio, as it "saves" one HD as a "spare drive" in the array, just in case of a single HD failure, and will replace that failed drive with the "saved" drive instantly so that you never lose data, or hardly ever. You'd have to have 2 HD's out of the 3 fail to lose data with RAID 5, at least in theory this is the case.The RAID 5 is connected to an Areca 1680IX-8 SAS to eSATA/SATA Hardware RAID Controller in the PC, and it's got a rudimentary installation of Vista 64-bit Ultimate on it to make it bootable, also. That's correct, I can boot the PC externally using the RAID 5 if necessary, and I do when I am building a film project from scratch if you must know the application's benefits. The RAID 5 writes at more than 405MB/sec, and reads at more than 430MB/sec with an empty volume to give you some perspective on "Hardware RAID" versus software, or system-bus RAID on an internal volume, so there is quite a benefit with the Areca 1680IX-8 controller in place.The second use for my WD Black SATA 2 HD's is as the boot system for the PC 90% of the time, as I have two (2) of the HD's mounted internally in the PC, still pushed by the Areca controller for hardware RAID 0 inside the case also. I have all of my main applications like Photoshop CS3, Illustrator 11, etc+ my web browser, Outlook, Mail, on this HD system, as it suffices to drive the PC most of the time, but for when I use the external RAID 5 and am involved in a film project. The 2TB RAID 0 (c.1.8TB formatted) gets your attention right away, as it's much faster than a system bus RAID 0 could ever be with the hardware cont
Скроменый эксперт
12.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
WD blacks are hands down the champ of 1 TB drives for gaming and fast loads. It's not as fast as some other drives out there, but it's a great value and these drives are very reliable.
Скроменый эксперт
10.07.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This highly advanced and high performance 2 TB Western Digital performs extremely well so far. The most unique feature of this drive is the off platter parking and locking when powered down. With this feature, the platters are not likely to suffer shock damages from the heads pounding from rough handling while being shipped. Speaking about shipping, Amazon.com as well as many other online retailer should do a better job of packaging OEM hard drives for shipping. My drive was shipped double boxed with the outer box slightly larger with an airbag pillow on one end. The inner box appear to be supplied by Western Digital with two plastic cushioning inserts on the ends and does appear to be adequate. The outer box practically does not offer any more protection from shock damages. The outer box should have been large enough to be fitted with some foam cushioning all around. The other desirable feature that this drive has is that it has dual processors and dual activators for the heads for precise tracking. The secondary activator utilizes piezoelectric technology to really fine tune in on the exact track on the platter quietly. This of course improved performance somewhat.I purchased this hard drive to use for additional storage on my computer. Because of the high-performance nature I feel this hard drive also makes an excellent boot drive for Windows. Of all the hard drive I ever purchase, it also produced the least amount of vibration when on. It's about as quiet as my Seagate hard drives. The only difference is that it makes the clunk sound occasionally when powered down when the heads park and lock. I'm paranoided from experience with my last two Seagate hard drive purchase that had growing reallocated section count shortly after placed in service. To make sure that I have a sound drive, right after installation I ran Western Digital's own Data Iifeguard For Windows to check for bad sections by running the complete surface scan. This software can be downloaded from Western Digital website. . I also ran a surface scan on this drive using HD Sentinel Pro. Both tests passed with no problems.Final thoughts: Because this Western Digital is better engineered than any of my previous hard drive, my hope is for longtime reliability. So far I'm fully impressed with the performance I have been receiving. When I ran a benchmark, the maximum read speed was almost 140 MB per second and the minimum was around 70 MB per second. Take for example when transferring files from one hard drive to another. I did an experiment on copying files on copying files from my old storage drive to my new drive. When the file is copy single file at a time the speed remains almost full of around 100 MB per second. But when I copy two files at the same time, the speed chokes down to around 25 MB per second for the two files. I try again on copying two files accept at this time, one file gets copied to the new drive and the other file is copied to my boot drive. The speed also get choked down again to around 25 MB per second for the two files. This proves in a way that the bottleneck is on my old storage drive.I tried this transferring test again except the new drive is the source this time. I copied one file to my old storage drive as well as copying another file to my boot drive at the same time. Only this time the speed remains the same on whether I copy one file or copying two or more files at the same time. The transfer speed remains close to 100 MB per second whether copying one file or two files at the same time.
Скроменый эксперт
20.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Works as I expected - but takes a while to wake up from sleeping. That could be because it is 2TB, or because it is the Green, low power, version. It works though and has been able to hold my media library. It is a great solution and I have been happy with it.I do wish that the warranty was longer though. 1 year just isn't quite enough that I have warm fuzzies with this drive.
Скроменый эксперт
26.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I take HDD quality very seriously. It's my data at stake. WD is my drive of choice. The price is right and the quality is high. You can get drives in the WD line that will match your durability to price needs.
Скроменый эксперт
14.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Purchased a few years ago, had no problems since. Works fast and great space for the money. Totally would recommend on a budget build
Скроменый эксперт
04.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
ALWAYS HAD BEST LUCK WITH WD HD. NEVER HAD ANY ISSUES AND THIS ITEM IS STILL BEING USED TODAY WITH GOOD RESULTS.
Скроменый эксперт
23.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I USE WESTERN DIGITAL HARD DRIVES 90% OF THE TIME, SPECIFICLY THE BLACK DRIVES. I HAVE FOUND THESE DRIVES (BLACK) TO BE VERY DURABLE.
Скроменый эксперт
31.12.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Got this to work with my other identical item. Doubled storage speed and increased read performance a bit (maybe 20% so far but I'm not sure if there's more I can do to tweak). On RAID 0: make sure you have the correct RAID drivers. I clearly identified "WIN 7" as my OS but Asus gave me plenty of non-Win 7 drivers to choose from so I went with the first/most recent which ended up being WRONG. Wasn't a big deal but it ate up a few hours as I tried to follow the procedure with the wrong drivers and with a 300Gig image to transfer... there goes a few hours. The Win 7 procedure is okay-ish but plenty of opportunities to botch it: Make recovery disk, make image backup of data (kept mine on an external HDD), tell your Bios you want RAID, configure your raid (ctrl+F1 i think... it tells you when you boot up), boot from recovery, option to restore from image, install drivers, pick the RAID drivers from your storage location (again had mine on a USB drive, thumb this time) in my case I had two drivers and a RAID console... installed all three no problem. With the first set of WRONG drivers I had it gave me like 50 drivers to chose from... it took forever to do whatever it was doing and gave no indication that it correctly installed so I went on to install the rest just to see what would happen and I would get an error message. when I got the correct drivers there was still no indication of "successful install" but I never got an error message and there was only three to choose from instead of 50 so I felt a lot better), Okay, where were we... yes, now just continue to load the image with all your files/settings and VOILA, DONE!! SIMPLE, right!?!? lol.. anyways it works, just a few steps to follow. I'm sure everyone's experience is a little different. I can't tell you how happy I was to walk back into my room and see that my computer had rebooted itself and all my desktop clutter/i-net favorites and everything else was right back where it should be but now on a 1.2 TB RAID array instead of 640GB... well, that's partially true... the drives were there but I had to go right click on "Computer" from start menue and then select "manage" and adjust settings in the disk managment section... Yeah... WOOHOO more crap to do! Well after clumsily Googling and a few head scratching moments and actions that didn't work... I think I ended up extending a drive or something and then VOILA went from 640GB to 1.2 TB. No data lost, no complete reinstall of Win 7. Just an awesome nerd experience for me to share. YES!!!
Скроменый эксперт
29.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This drive is just like brand new I am going to install it in my iMac when I put it into service as a household server.
Скроменый эксперт
08.07.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this 1.5 years ago and so far have had no issues with it. Performance is pretty good, though it is a tiny bit noisy. HD Tune Pro says that the default AAM setting is 128 (low noise) - but on a performance drive how could that be? It must be reading it wrong. I set it to 254 (high performance) anyway. It makes quite a bit of difference. This drive does make some noise at times when randomly seeking (ex. booting Windows), and I can hear it even though it's in my mid-ATX case that's under the desk. Otherwise, aside from the motor running (and that's not much, it might be my Samsung drive), I can barely hear it.This drive runs a bit hotter than my Samsung, but I believe that one is not meant for performance, which this is. Right now it's 76F or so in here and the WD is at 39C, and the samsung is at 33C. I have the os and programs on the wd though, just some files on the samsung. That's a little odd though, given the Samsung is on the top drive bay and this WD is on the bottom (one free bay inbetween them).Given the luck I've had with WD drives, I'm expecting this to last for quite a while. Of course, the 5 year warranty should help if I ever have an issue.Although SATA 2 is typical, I'm really not sure why they bother given a spinning hard disk cannot saturate the bandwidth of SATA 1 (in theory anyway).Anyway, this is a good drive and I'd definitely buy another one if I needed it (maybe higher capacity though). $70 for 640GB isn't too great when you can get 2TB drives for less than $100. They are significantly slower drives though. I bet the $80 WD Caviar Green 2TB doesn't compare with performance.
Скроменый эксперт
10.05.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Okay so i received my hard drive in the mail today, and it was packaged in a small priority Envelope, once single piece of packing paper around it for shielding. Really you couldn't spend 1.50 more and get a small box and pack it better. your shipping a HARD DRIVE!!!they are very temperamental, you cant ship them like that without the proper packing...Im just flabbergasted that you really sent me my hard drive like this. i am really amazed. Other than that i will try out the hard drive tonight or tomorrow to see if it works. i hoping for the best.
Показаны отзывы 49-72 из 497.
