Отзывы о Видеокамера Sony HDR-CX900E
333 отзывов пользователей o Sony HDR-CX900E
Пользовались
Sony HDR-CX900E?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Папа Карло
04.07.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Отличная модель,очень высокое качество,но чтобы полностью оценить,нужен FullHD1080i телевизор(на выходе камеры для простого телевизора сигнал Standart Density). Хорошее программное обеспечение позволяет записать фильм в формате AVCHD на диск или конвертировать в любой удобный формат без заметной потери качества(при...
odminovich odmin
12.09.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + хорошая камера, получаются большие снимки. стандартный узб. нет геморроев по поводу переписывания кассет и постоянной покупки мелких двд болванок. для домашнего видео...
Скроменый эксперт
24.07.2008
1/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Видеокамера очень компактная, в полне удобная в обращении, снмает очень качественно.
- - Единственный недостаток пока заключается в том что не поддерживает Memory Stick Pro Duo китайского производства.
Если Вы хотите иметь простую, удобную, современную камеру берите эту. Я не разбираюсь в балансе белого, красного и прочего, я купил эту камеру и очень доволен. Качество съемки отличное, звука тоже.
иванов владимир
02.09.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- - все в ней хорошо,только при перекодировании в dvd сильно теряется качество изображения и когда освещение неочень яркое много шумов даже при съемке в формате avchd,а вообще доволен...
Пырьевский Никита
09.06.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Компактность. Понятный интерфейс (пока еще не читал инструкцию). USB вход стандартный. Удивительное качество изображения и звука. Нет никаких посторонних шумов - только чистый и объемный звук. Большой запас по времени записи (еще ни разу стирал записанные с первого дня фрагменты). Удивительный софт - пометил нужные...
Петунин Димыч
23.06.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Отпишу ещё немного для "выбирающих" камеру..
Снимал уже несколько раз..монтирую в пинакле 11..всем доволен..картинка хорошая..
Одно но..при вечерней сьёмке(снимал фанов с балкона 13 этажа-при выходе наших в полуфинал)...
Снимал уже несколько раз..монтирую в пинакле 11..всем доволен..картинка хорошая..
Одно но..при вечерней сьёмке(снимал фанов с балкона 13 этажа-при выходе наших в полуфинал)...
Sea Aleks
05.07.2008
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- - Единственный и самый важный ШУМЫ!
Купил блин. Обратите внимание на уровень шума при отличном освещении в квартире! Вот пример выложил http://uaimage.com?page=i&u=72a099e Как...
igla-igla
20.06.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Это HDV,а не загадочный AVCHD.
Яркие,сочные цвета,достойная работа стабилизатора,отлично лежит в руке...
Секов Игорь
06.06.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Не смотря на то, что камера находится в любительском сегменте у неё великолепное качество изображения,...
Александр
06.07.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Искал рабочую лошадку для съемок. Не смотря на то, что модель 2008 года, все ее ТТХ меня полностью устраивают. Как то эта камера оказалась...
Gleb Kozyrev
16.10.2022
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Хорошее качество фото и видео, сенсорный LCD дисплей, есть ночная съёмка, до сих пор живая, удобно держать...
Yohan Edelshtain
02.12.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + - очень компактная, при этом есть все органы управления, включая колесико ручных параметров фокусировки, корректировки экспозиции и тд.
- оптика Carl Zeiss c фирменным просветлением.
- отличный оптический стабилизатор.
- CMOS матрица Clear Vid, в этой камере она действительно большого разрешения, при этом для серии любительски Хендикамов большого размера (до этого была UX10, там картинка уступала немного), тут четкость и детализация прямо завораживают.
- Night Shot ))) Мелочь - а иногда выручает.
- HDMI наконец то сзади, удобно при подключении внешнего монитора для съемки
- звук 5.1 Dolby Digital - великолепен даже на встроенном микрофоне. - - - жаль, что отказались от видоискателя,...
Павел Лосев
02.12.2020
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Продукция Sony, и этим во многом все связано. Камеры изготовлена в Японии. Отличное качество. Качество видео отличное. Фото тоже на уровне. Зум ручной и цифровой. Есть возможность установки дополнительной оптики и аксессуаров. В комплекте с камерой приложения...
Yohan Edelshtain
02.04.2019
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + - Хорошая брендовая оптика.
- Действительно классный стабилизатор.
- Отличное управление (особенно если со штативом VCT серии, камера расскрывается полностью).
- Адаптивный 5.1 микрофон с шикарным качеством записи.
- Удобно что гибридная память, хотя DVD безнадежно устарел, но делиться видео на месте очень удобно.
- NightShot - а я Вас вижу...
Наталья А.
18.07.2019
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + девять лет, записано более 110 кассет, все безотказно, качество записи на кассету на порядок выше, объектив...
Скроменый эксперт
07.09.2011
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I probably should not write a review when I'm in a bad mood or when I'm having problems with a product . . . but here goes anyway.The good news: The Sony HDR-SR10 40 gb is indeed a High Def. camera that records a high definition picture and a fairly decent audio track in (supposedly) 5.1 Surround Sound. It seems to be robust and error or trouble free in terms of glitches, software and otherwise. And it interfaces with both my PC and iMac with Standard and HiDef footage. However, for the price, you're paying way too much for a camera with as many limitations as this one has.Let's start with Sony support. It's basically non existent. Nuff said there.So let's go to the manual. Oh hell, what's the point? The manual was apparently written by a team of engineers from many different countries, all of whom were supervised and/or edited by a person who perhaps did not originate on this planet. Not to mention the fact that the camera, for which you pay nearly $1,000, does not actually come with a full operations manual. The full manual is only available as a PDF download. You know what it's like to figure something out from a pdf file, how easy it is to scroll and/or search for something? How about having to look something up in the field when you don't have your laptop or iphone with you?You have this tiny touchscreen screen with Klingon-like icons. very confusing. Just now I was trying to divide a video into separate clips. Impossible. You're also suppose to be able to create a playlist of some kind. Haven't figured out how to do that. Why? Because I have a life and I don't want to spend a week trying to decipher Sony's poor excuse for an instruction manual.But forget that for a sec. Let's just talk about performance.5.1 Surround Sound? From one microphone? If you believe that, I have some Florida swampland, I mean real estate to show you. Seriously, I would be happy if the camera would just record in the field once without all the annoying snap, crackles and pops. Every time I show a video it sounds like I was shooting the footage while eating a bowl of Rice Krispies.Battery Life? Crap. And believe me, I'm great with batteries. I know how to treat batteries. Big deal. My 8 hour battery lasts 2-1/2 hours. Why? Who knows?Stills? OK, why make a High Def. video camera and only put in a 4 mp digital camera? I have a 10 mp camera I can carry in my ear canal.Ergonomics? It's small. Big deal. Small isn't that great. Make it a little bigger so you can have audio inputs. Wouldn't it be nice to record mp3 format directly to the hard drive? Then maybe you can have real, honest to goodness sound quality, although, if you ignore the snaps and pops. the audio isn't half bad.Video perfomance. In High Def. Pretty good, as long as you have plenty of light. Don't shoot inside under normal room lights. You'll be disappointed. In other words, if you're buying a camera to take videos and pictures of the kids, you can do just as well or better for half the money or less. In fact, I have an iPod Nano that takes better video indoors than this thing does. Sure, I can get into the guts of the camera and change the settings, but that would require doing a Vulcan mind meld with the manual. I'd rather bury myself neck deep in a vat of spoiled herring juice.OK, that wasn't so bad. At least I didn't resort to profanity and say stuff like, Sony ****s.
Скроменый эксперт
15.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
It is what it is - HDR-SR10 but the HDR-SR11 is much better. However, this camcorder will only be used for Static Cameras in paranormal investigation. However though, upon filming in the day - I noticed the Automatic Focus kept on blurring in and out when moved suddenly. There may be a way to change this but far as I can see it - I don't think I have the control for manual focus. It doesn't have 60 frames per second just only 30 frames per second.What I didn't appreciate was there were still video files in the memory card. I'm not sure if anyone has came across this before but yeah - at least erase the memory card before shipping it out.
Скроменый эксперт
03.02.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought is back in 2008. This was a hot product at that time. Sony products are always good. Picture quality is good. I recommend this product.
Скроменый эксперт
13.02.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The TG1 is Sony's attempt at producing a premium quality ultra-compact camcorder. They touted it as the world's smallest full HD camcorder and yes the thing is very slim, and pretty much pocketable in a coat pocket. Much of the body is titanium metal with some kind of coating to help resist scratches. This is a camcorder that you could comfortably carry with you everywhere you go, which makes it a great choice as a secondary camcorder. It's great for the person who wants to travel as light as possible. I'm not going to write a verbose review describing every feature, because frankly, you can read much of what you need to know about its features, specs, in the marketing description above. Rather I'll just focus on the essentials of what I think of it as a user. I'm still experimenting with it so I will keep this review up to date if I discover anything new.- Build: This thing feels solid and substantial. From what I gather, the body is basically all metal, mostly high-tech titanium alloy to save weight, and everything about it feels high quality. Easily meets my expectations for the price.- Accessories: the package includes a docking bay so you can charge and transfer files from the camcorder without fiddling with cables. If you don't want to use the dock, it also includes a special cable that plugs into the dock connector which allows you to plug in a USB cable to transfer files. It includes brick charger that plugs into the camcorder or docking bay. You do not get any sort of case, nor does it include a remote (none is available). It's also missing an HDMI to mini-HDMI cable if you want to view your videos on your HDTV (note: there are some inexpensive online sources for this....you don't have to buy a $50-75 cable that your local big box store might be charging you). You get a 4GB memory stick which gives you around 30 minutes of video at highest quality, but of course if you lower the quality and resolution setting, you can get a lot more recording capacity. For my precious memories, I always kept it at the maximum quality setting. I recommend buying a 16GB memory stick for about $80 (as of early 2009) which gives you 2 hours of full quality recording which was enough for me to capture my one week vacation.- Software: I don't have anything to report on this because I didn't even install it. People say it doesn't do much for editing so I've been looking at using other software to transfer and edit my videos. More on this later. You don't really need to install this if you have other editing software.- Quality: if there is good light (e.g. daytime, outdoors). The quality is very good at the high quality setting. Being HD, the scenes are chockfull of detail that are lost on lesser non-HD camcorders. There is a small degree of graininess but nothing objectionable unless your reference is much bigger camcorder. However, the picture quality falls apart when the light level falls. It becomes very grainy and the focussing is slow and gets confused often. When I took the camcorder on side theme park rides that went into some dark areas, the camera lost focus fairly easily and seemed to "search and hunt" a lot and very slowly regain focus. The 10X lens is decent enough to capture a lot of detail, more than average for this size class. It's not particularly wide-angle (starts at 43mm) but it's about the same as others. The still picture is 4 megapixels which seems like it could be good enough on paper, but I suggest that any $150 point and shoot still camera will still take better pictures than this camcorder so. I think it is worth carrying around a real still digital camera rather than relying on the TG1 for still pictures for your precious vacation shots. The stabilization is decent, as good as my last two camcorders in that respect, so no complaints there.- Battery: the real-time charge indicator indicates around 60 minutes of recording but in reality you'll get much less if you start/stop/shutdown your camcorder repeatedly. I'd estimate more like 30-40 minutes if you have that usage pattern. So you really want to have an extra battery with you if you plan to go all day recording on your vacation. The camcorder goes into "standby/quick start" mode every time for about 10 minutes when you first shut the LCD panel, and then finally shuts down completely after that. That could contribute to the diminished battery life if you film in short bursts over the day.- Ease of use. The touch screen operation isn't that complicated to use if you are the type to not read the manual and you plan to use it in "fully automatic" mode most of the time. There were a few things I needed to consult the manual for, like how to get it into the "Fireworks" mode (which by the way, you'll want to use this mode because it locks the camera into long focus so the fireworks don't go out of focus and sets up a better exposure). I also had to look up how to get the camera hooked up to transfer the files (use the dock, flip on the display, pre
Скроменый эксперт
19.10.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have several sony HD VIDEO CAMERAS, Infact I purchased three on these. One got ran over by truck. I quickly found two more to buy. These work great, they are small and you can carry with you. the quality is very good,
Скроменый эксперт
07.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
December 2008I am writing this preliminary review after I saw all the negative ones here on Amazon. I am amazed on how people can differ so greatly on the exact same item. I think the negatives here are not fair for this nice little marvel of technology.I bought this camera here on Amazon and have been playing with for about a week now. Let me start by saying that I take more video now than ever before, the key here is the size of the camera. I am an avid photographer & videographer and I usually go for high end equipment which also means large, heavy and complex controls. I already own 2 other Sony HD camcorders and I was looking for something I can keep in my pocket for those unexpected and spontaneous moments with the kids.Let me tell you this is the perfect little camera for that purpose. If you are looking for a high end HD then you are looking at the wrong camera. Nothing on the market at this point will be comparable to the full size cameras and offer the size advantage of this little gem.Now having said that, this statement applies to any camera that size, and that is true. However at this point there is only one other worthy competitor on the market and that is the Sanyo Xacti HD1010. I did very careful research for 3 weeks before I made my decision, I love Sanyo and had many good products by them. But there was one deal killer for me with the HD1010 and that was image stabilization. It is just terrible, really it should have went back to the design board. Shaky images is the Achilles heal of video. The Sony image stabilization on the other had is very impressive, Sony uses optical system vs. Sanyo which is electronic.This Sony is not without criticism either, it records in AVCHD format which is really a pain in the butt to edit on windows or even to view right out of the camera. You must convert the file first to something Windows can understand, and unless you like to tinker with that stuff this becomes a headache. Windows just cannot handle AVCHD file without some conversion first.You can use Sony Vegas, Pinnacle Studio 12 and a few other on the market and you must have a newer computer with lots of horsepower to keep up with this format. For Macs, all the newer Mac/Intel machines can handle AVCHD, older ones need some software additions. This is a limitation of all AVCHD at this point, so not unique to this camera. Sony, Canon, JVC and Panasonic all moved to this format now. The only way to avoid it at this point is to use tape based camcorders using HDV.This Sony has fair low light performance compared to the full size HD cams, but the way I look at it is this, I have the fair image now to look at, when I had nothing before because I never carried the bigger camcorder everywhere. The kids have fun instantly watching to footage on the camera screen & I caught priceless moments that I would have otherwise never had. Not to mention that I can download the files in seconds on to hard drive and I view & edit using Sony Vegas, the freebie software that Sony send with the camera is lacking. If you own a PlayStation (PS3) you're in luck, you can view the video directly from the memory card or you can dump it on a regular DVD and view it in HD on the PS3.If you want the ultimate video quality, then tape is still the way to go today using HDV. Even the top of the line AVCHD today the Sony HDR-SR12 is not capable of delivering the quality of the HDV & tape like Sony HDR-HC9. So it is all a matter of perspective.The digital photo function on the TG1 is average, only 4mp, consider this part a bonus feature. If you are looking for a real high quality digital camera, the HDR-TG1 is not going to provide it for you.The Sanyo on other hand uses an easier file format that works with most existing software and is readily recognized by Windows. That could be a big advantage for someone who has no interest in dealing with editing and software ..etc. To me that was never an issue though, I already do a lot of editing with my other HDV footage. Another plus for me was the compatibility of batteries, chargers & other accessories from the other Sonys I already own. I just could not deal with the very visible jittery video that the Sanyo produced.All in all, I think this is an excellent buy, not perfect but I now have the memories when before I did not, how much is that worth? I don't think the kids will complain much when they grow up that the video was not shot on the top of the line camera of it's time !!If you are buying this camera, it is strictly for the size and portability,and it does make a big difference between getting it on video or nothing at all. If this the only video camera you plan on buying then I recommend the HDR-SR12 if you don't mind the size. This HDR-TG1 on the other hand is truly a joy to hold and play with. It is very well made has a lot of heft to it, and feels solid.What I like:1. Size: extremely portable, shirt pocket size & can take it everywhere.2. HD video: smallest on the market, very h
Скроменый эксперт
20.11.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've tried out a number of high definition camcorders in the last few years and so far this is my favorite, even compared to bigger, more robust models. That's not to say that the HDR-TG1 isn't full featured. It is. It's also one of the most elegant and easy-to-use HD camcorders on the market today. Admittedly, I like Sony products a great deal but they've raised the bar here and the HDR-TG1 looks good, feels great, and produces video of such startling clarity that it can take your breath away.Here's how the HDR-TG1 breaks down:PROS:- Insanely high resolution 1920x1080i video that's super sharp.- Audio picked from the top mounted mike is clear and loud. I was worried this was going to be the weak point of the design, but the sound is tremendous and can even focus on specific targets when using face recognition mode.- The titanium body makes it light and doesn't dimple, which is what I was worried about when it's in my pocket for long periods of time. Since it's brushed, no fingerprints ever appear. Very slick.- Fast startup. I can take it out of my pocket and start recording in 4-5 seconds if it's not in standby and in 1-2 seconds if it is. Never miss a shot again.- Very well designed menus usable by touch screen. Auto-scene indexing is excellent and the options for most features are quickly found.- LCD is amazingly sharp and bright, even outside.- Zoom control is about the most ergonomic I've seen on a camera, though I've found it's also easy to forget which direction to go in.- One handed operation for all major features while recording.- The automated lens cap is extremely handy and tries hard to keep the lens covered at all times except when actually recording.- Battery life is good, if not stellar. Have not run out of power yet, but you'll need to be good about keeping it on the charging stand.- Nice heft and just about perfect size. Fits easily in a coat or pants pocket. This thing is slightly smaller than it even looks in the pictures.- The steadyshot makes a big difference in video quality compared to other compact HD camcorders. I've tried a number of other compact camcorders and with the resolution of HD, image stabilization is a must. The HDR-TG1's steadyshot may not be the very best but it produces very decent results compared to other camcorders in the same category.CONS- The AVCHD format that the camera uses is not the most well supported HD video format out there. Many editing applications and video upload sites will not like the *.MTS files that the HDR-TG1 outputs. iMovie on the Mac is about the best for handling them though there are others. Bottom line: You will have to get used to some post processing of the files to use them elsewhere.- The joint mount of the LCD display seems to be a design weak spot in an otherwise incredibly well built device. I'm having no problems right now but I can see how this might wear out in a year or two of regular use. I bought the extra warranty so I'm hoping Sony will just give me a new camcorder if this breaks.- No audio input jack. Although it doesn't really seem to need it, but it's always a nice feature to have on a camcorder. But it would also make this little gem seem a little uglier.- The still photos the HDR-TG1 takes are the typically awful ones you get from a camcorder CCD. No surprise here but it's definitely a downside; for good stills you'll still need to pack a dedicated digital camera.- Connecting to USB on this device requires a special dongle or the base station. Not very convenient IMHO but they've tried very hard to make this iPod-like in terms of utter simplicity and understated elegance, meaning that there's really not much room to stick an ugly USB port on the body of this device without ruining the design. There is a dock connector at the bottom that turns into the USB port with dongle or dock (both included with the device.)- Low light performance is not the strong point of this camcorder. The lens is just too small to gather enough light. That being said, its BIONZ processor does well compared to other compact HD cams. I just pack a portable light, though I wish the HDR-TG1's built-in flash was really a video light source since the still photo function isn't worth much anyway. Note: Well lit interiors record just fine, but candlelight and a little bit brighter do not come out as well.All in all, the HDR-TG1 has become my new favorite camcorder since the size and features are just right and I end up having it with me for all occasions. I'd buy this again in a heartbeat and I'm using it almost every day now. Finally a compact HD camcorder with just about zero compromises.
Скроменый эксперт
14.05.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Everything is great! It is great for quick pics and clips that are an appropriate size for uploading quickly to websites. The night-shot feature is also great if objects filmed are in close proximity.
Скроменый эксперт
28.05.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have this camera and a Canon HF10 so I'm going to lift some of the AVCHD-specific stuff from my HF10 review.I bought the HF10 for it's super-fast focus when shooting my kids' sporting events. I bought the TG1 for it's superior portability. I'm happy to say both are awesome cameras. One big negative for the Sony camera is that 16gb of memory (Memory Stick Pro Duo Mark 2) costs 2.5 times as much for this camera as it does for the HF10 which uses SDHC. That's a complete rip off but no other HD video camera fits in your pocket like this one so that's the price you pay for portability. Battery life is another price you pay but I got every video I wanted, in great quality, from the beach this past weekend and had plenty of battery and memory to spare. If you're going to film long events this is not the camera for you. In still camera terminology think of it as pocket point-and-shoot and not an SLR.This is a fantastic camera but people need to have more realistic expectations of what to expect from AVCHD. It is a highly compressed format so using this camera in low-light conditions is going to produce pretty "grainy" results. In good lighting AVCHD output from this camera can produce some really great looking results in HD but don't kid yourself into thinking you're going to get professional HDTV quality. This is a point-and-shoot.This is a great camera if you use a Mac but you will probably find it very frustrating if you use a PC...I use both Macs and PC and I have to tell you that you that PCs suck for AVCHD - you will waste a lot of time and pull your hair out. I'm sure PC video software vendors will address this eventually, but seriously folks if you want to do this the easy way get an Intel-based Mac (caveat: only Intel based machines using Leopard support AVCHD) and use either iMovie or Final Cut Express 4. Both of these programs (iMovie 08 and FCE4) just LOVE this camera (and Canon HF10 and hard disk-based Sony AVCHD as well) and they work like a charm. Video making has never been this easy. FCE4 lets you mix AVHCD, HDV and SD video on the same timeline and save in whatever format you want so it's worth the $200 if you want to do that or have more exacting control over your videos. It is basically a (lightly) stripped-down version of Apple's excellent professional video software (Final Cut Pro) and it is very good. For most home videos iMovie 08 (which comes in iLife 08) will be just fine. No, better than fine. You will LOVE how easy it is to create great movies with iMovie 08 and how easy it is to save them in a variety of formats and sizes and share them with friends and family. It is a piece of cake to edit movies in iMovie 08 and then put them on a Mac Web Gallery (at up to 960x540 which is higher than DVD quality) for family members to see or dump them out on a DVD (using iLife 08's iDVD) for your family members who are less tech savvy. You can even dump them out to 1080p Quicktime movies if you desire. I enjoy sticking movies of the kids on my wife's iPhone so she can show them to her friends.I've had no problem transferring the movies directly from the camera but you do need to have the camera plugged into the AC to do it. You can avoid plugging the camera into your Mac to transfer the files by getting a memory stick reader. You can get a Transcend M5 reader here on Amazon for under $10 and it works great with the Memory Stick Duo Mark2 cards.The video camera is just acting like a USB reader when you connect it to your Mac anyway - it is the file layouts that the software recognizes. When read in and converted to Apple Intermediate Codec at 1920x1080 they will balloon in size. If you want to store the raw video in a more compressed way you can simply copy the root directory of the card to another directory and copy it back again later. If you're working with AVCHD you need to buy the biggest hard drives you can afford. 60 minutes of video will use up something like 50Gb of storage on your Mac when converted to 1920x1080. If you just want great looking home video to show on your HDTV, but don't want to go broke on hard drives, Apple offers to import the movies at a slightly lower resolution (960x540) which takes up a LOT less space with very little drop in quality. I have been making home videos and showing them on an Apple TV at that resolution and they look stunning. The quality difference between that resolution and full HD isn't that big of a deal.If you want to try to get truly professional-quality video you should avoid AVCHD cameras and stick to the HDV format concentrating on cameras with larger sensors. But this is great camera for HD home videos at a great price.The user interface on this camera is better than the Canon HDF10 for reviewing your video but sucks for adjustments on the fly. Adjusting exposure manually is a pain in the butt and the UI for it obscures a lot of the picture. I wish they had added a dial or button set for adjust exposure and/or backlighting control on the came
Показаны отзывы 241-264 из 333.
