Отзывы о Сканер Plustek OpticFilm 8200i SE

146 отзывов пользователей o Plustek OpticFilm 8200i SE

Пользовались Plustek OpticFilm 8200i SE?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Profile no image

Супернова-3HZQO

08.04.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

After getting back into 35mm film shooting, I was finding scanning with my Epson V500 very frustrating. Even with ANR glass inserts, it was still hard to avoid Newton Rings on my images. While the medium format scanning was great, something was lacking on the 35mm end. So I started searching for an affordable option that would yield acceptable results.As far as a dedicated 35 scanner goes, the Nikon Coolscans are top of the food chain, and out of my price range. I searched Flickr for a couple of weeks and viewed images scanned with different equipment. I decided I liked what I saw with the 7300 so I ordered it up. Amazon's shipping was ridiculously quick, by the way.What I get from the 7300 is beyond what I could have expected at this price point. The Silverfast software packaged with the scanner is $120 by itself. It is a very powerful piece of software with a tremendous amount of control. Once I got the basic understanding of the software suite down, the very first scan was amazing. It was the same sized tiff that I would get from the V500, but the detail in the grain was so sharp! I'm still blown away at the sharpness that this little scanner is able to read. When enlarging a file in Photoshop, it's just like looking through a grain magnifier in the darkroom. The negative holder holds the film very, very flat. Most film would have to be flattened under the weight of books for a day or two just to get a half way decent scan with the Epson.While it is missing some features, such as digital ICE, and auto-feed, it works perfectly for my needs. I also wish I was able to scan 100% of the image, borders included, but it's pretty close. The actual footprint of the scanner is tiny too, easy to fit on a desk.I love it and wouldn't hesitate to buy it.
источник
Profile no image

МехаРейнджер-4ZQHD

01.05.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This scanner works like scanners costing 10 -20x the price. I am impressed. However the software is not easy to figure out. Has so many options you mistakenly click the wrong button and jam the computer. It's best to use the simple scan option and clean and color correct the image with Photoshop or some other program. All in all, a great deal. Highly recommended.
источник
Profile no image

ХроноГость-8RVFV

04.05.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Out of the box the 7300 does just what it should do. I am using it with my Corel photo software because that's what I'm used to. I am scanning slides from 1960 - 1965 at present and they look wonderful. I will try the supplied software later but for now the quick setup is zipping along and doing everything I need for clean, clear pictures.
источник
Profile no image

Дроид-0VRBD

23.04.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This scanner works beautifully right out of the box. Very easy to digitize old slides, and have also scanned some old b/w negatives. Very quick and simple operation. Location of digital user manual is not immediately apparent, but is not really needed. I'm pleased, and have pleased others by surprising them with an email containing photos they'd forgotten, or never seen.
источник
Profile no image

Супернова-9NFXZ

20.12.2008

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I hope this review helps out any MAC / OSX 10.5 people out there.My criteria was to buy a decent 35mm film scanner that fell within $200 - $300. Had to be OSX compatible and create scans around 5 megs each I believe it can go up to 12 meg scans.At first I thought I would be stuck with buying a really expensive scanner but did read some reviews of this Plustek. As others have described the instructions are lacking.Installation.Based on the my installation experience of the software this improved compared from the past reviews. I installed the silverfast software SE software and and started scanning within 10 minutes. I recommend that you also go to their website for the latest update. I received this in November 08 and was several revisions down. Everything went smoothly after the update.ExperienceDepending on the quality you are looking for this unit did go beyond my expectations with old 35mm film. The speed to scan is not bad. If you are using single pass. You can use up to 16 pass scans but that does take much longer (Noticed the Silverfast app would crash after first installing the sotfware. To fix this I ran disk utility to repair permissions and everything is working fine). A single pass scan take about a minute to show up on my macbook pro. Dust removal does work but really depends on how much damage was done to the film. The more damage, the more you will need to retouch using photoshop.Finally, the filter presets for the type of film does work great. Use this!Final ImpressionsAs I am writing this I dropped this down from 5 to 4 stars. For the price this is a great scanner. Works with my Macbook Pro and and does excellent scans. It is a manual feed scanner. I am taking one star away because it does not include the best documentation and the web site support is rather lacking. The Silverfast software is not as intuitive as other OS X applications but isn't too bad after getting used to it. If you have prior experience with scanning and retouching this is a great film scanner.
источник
Profile no image

НаноПилигрим-9YLEJ

23.04.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Mechanically it's simple to use. The software is something else however. After installing the software, one has to fine tune it to give optimal results. This isn't a bad thing just tedious, it's got a lot of filters to turn on or off. The results are well worth the tuneing.
источник
Profile no image

Астрон-7VUTF

18.04.2010

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I bought this scanner specifically to improve my efficiency in scanning slides on a Mac and could not get the same scan quality as I had with my Canon flat bed scanner. Scans consistently were under exposed with poor color saturation. I could not easily correct with the software.
источник
Profile no image

Сатурниан-3XCYE

16.10.2009

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I have used it for about a month. It is sooo slow. It also has glitches in the software. It was hard to install taking 3 attempts to even get it running. Quality of scans is satisfactory. Positioning of slides is poor and often takes a couple trys. It frequently gives the message, Not Responding and requires a second scan taking several minutes. A bunch of minutes if scanning at a level with quality. You can make a cup of coffee between scans and i mean starting with pumping the water, going to the store for the beans and grinding them by hand.If you have countless hours to dedicate to scanning your slides it might be OK. it took me three days to scan a tray of 100 slides. If you only have a few then go for it. If you have several hundred or thousands then prepare to spend the rest of your life doing this choir.
источник
Profile no image

Альфа-Юнит-5VYLO

21.04.2009

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I was a professional photographer and photographic lab technician for a total of 17 years and find the Plustek 7300 a cost-effective and useful tool. I have approximately 8000, old slides and negatives to sort through, and I will probably only scan a small fraction of them, so a medium-priced,dedicated scanner like this Plustek makes sense for me.It gives amazingly detailed scans of both slides and negatives, even at just 3600 dpi. You can go even higher if you like, but the files become huge, and unless you are going to print a 16x20, you don't need to go beyond making a 3600 dpi/50 megabyte TIFF (which will convert to an approximately 5 to 8 megabyte JPEG). You can send 4 or 5 JPEGs of this size via e-mail at one time, but if you go bigger, expect a lot of problems.The Silverfast software that comes with it gives excellent control over color and contrast. Based on what I have read about flatbed film scanners, I doubt that I would have been satisfied with the resolution they offer as I have always been a high-definition hound. Neither am I worried about scanning every negative I ever shot, so I don't need the speed of a flatbed scanner. If you want to escape to your computer now and then to convert your best negatives and slides into a modern, useable format, this scanner will serve you well.
источник
Profile no image

Альфа-Юнит-2BWHW

10.02.2010

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

The product is good for quick scanning slides. I have already scanned over 1000.Support was pretty quick when I had an issue.The silver fast prorgram is very confusing and I will stick with Photoshop Elements for editting
источник
Profile no image

Капеллан-9HJGY

16.12.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I PURCHASED BY THE REVIEWS I READ. THIS ITEM IS COMPACT AND DOES WHAT IT SAYS, IT'S NOT THE FASTIEST BUT YOU WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER ALL THOSE OLD PHOTOS AND SLIDES. I ALSO PURCHASED ADOBE PHOTO SHOP ELEMENTS VER.8 AND VUESCAN SOFTWARE WHICH ARE EASIER TO USE THAN THE SILVERFAST SOFTWARE IT COMES WITH. THIS TAKES A LITTLE LONGER BUT GREAT RESULTS. I'M VERY PLEASED WITH MY PURCHASE. VUESCAN SOFTWARE AT [...]
источник
Profile no image

КиберНаблюдатель-3QLSF

18.01.2009

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

the scanner comes with 2 software cd's. i installed the one that is for the 7300 and not the Silverfast which i was saving for later. after the software installation said Finish i finished but i did not think the software really installed correctly. i began to use the scanner. i have about a zillion slides i want to put on dvd. i scanned in 2 slides and got 2 itty bitty 9k images smaller than a thumbnail. i still suspected a software install problem as when following their procedure one screen display never appeared.i then tried to install Silverfast and it crashed my system. i uninstalled the first software and tried a reinstall. no go.i went on plustek web site and submitted a tech support request.four weeks later no answer.eventually i found out my dvd player was crapola and had gone flakey on me right about the time i got my plustek. after installing a new dvd i got a good install from both softwares and i am up and running now!product is great, both softwares similar and both are good.so provided your dvd player is operative i recommend this product.
источник
Profile no image

МехаРейнджер-0MGJD

09.09.2009

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

This is a good product overall. I used it for couple client project to do about 1000 slides total. I would have rated 5 stars if it was not for the clunky software. For the price this is a great scanner. I would recommend.
источник
Profile no image

ХроноГость-8VEKG

23.05.2009

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Easy to use. I am not wild about the software that comes with it. Seems like you can find other scanners that remove dust and scratches when it makes the scan. The software that comes with it is very average. The actual piece of hardware is nice, but all your touch up work has to be done in Photoshop.Because of the software issue I'm not sure I would recommend it to someone. Do your research on the software that accompanies your scanner. That the one problem I have with this scanner
источник
Profile no image

НоваГость-0CEWE

24.01.2008

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I've been using this scanner for a couple of days now, and have scanned approx. 50 negs.Pros: Works as promised. Installation is quick and easy. You can get the software installed and ready to work in minutes. I tried both Quick Scan and Intelliscan. If you are trying to preserve your treasured memory recorded on your negs, don't bother with Quick Scan as its result is quite poor. Intellican, together with SliveFast software, on the other hand can produce very good results. I'm now using Intelliscan exclusively to scan all my negs into digital photos. SilverFast software is powerful and feature rich. There are many switches and knobs you can turn to adjust your scan result. The build quality of this machine is also very impressive.Cons: I consider these things minor, but they do affect user experience.1) There are 3 Quick Start guides when you open the box, how will you know which one to go first? Well, let me document it here so everyone else can save some time. Follow the Quick Start guide for hardware and driver installation first. If you don't want to bother with Quick Scan that generates poor result, skip the guide on that. Follow the guide on SilverFast software installation guide. Once finished, you can start scanning your negs and slides using Intelliscan.2) The learning curve for SilverFast is steep because its documentation is not very well organized. The CD does contain QuickTime movies that explain various features in the software, but there is nothing to connect them together to give you a bigger picture on the work flow that you will go through. But I still find that to be more useful than the doc.3) The film holder is not the easiest thing to use. I wish it had "teeth" that can quickly and easily hold your neg strips in place.4) If you plan to scan all your negs accumulated over the years in one weekend, it won't happen.Conclusion: Overall, it's a very good machine that gets the job done. Result is good, and price is reasonable. For all the memory recorded on your early pictures, spending a bit time to preserve it is well worthwhile.
источник
Profile no image

Лунатик-8QTOS

22.02.2009

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

There are a few issues, but I'd buy it again. Originally, there was a film alignment issue: the frames had a 2 degree tilt and the bottom of the image was cut off. I probably should have sent it in for warranty work, but instead took it apart and fixed it. Now it looks great. SilverFast works okay, but the scratch & dust removal feature is pretty much worthless. Plan either to upgrade to a more expensive version of SilverFast, or spend a lot of time manually removing scratches and spots. And the scanning process itself takes awhile. If I was scanning professionally, I would not be happy. But the quality of the scans themselves is very good, so for personal use and considering the price, I'd buy it again.
источник
Profile no image

КиберНаблюдатель-0YWCR

12.05.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This scanner is a marvel! It arrived less than 24 hours after I'd place theorder, and it has changed my life! I'd struggled with terrible name-brandflat-bed scanners for years [they produced terrible noise in the shadows andwere dead-slow at resolutions above 200dpi] in my efforts to digitalize acollection of many thousands of treasured 35mm slides dating back 50 years.Not only is this scanner incredibly fast compared to the my old ones, but itdoes a triple pass for every slide, then averages the results to produceimages that are beautiful and have no noise in the shadows. I've succeededin making wonderful pictures from slides that were terrible! One set, veryimportant to family memories, taken in 1969 at a special occasion, had beenunusable due to inadequate flash technique [they made everyone look likestainless steel; i.e., no flesh tones and gleaming highlights]. Due to thecapacity to try different resolutions [up to 7200dpi] and then use theremarkable software to achieve optimal tones, I was able to resurrect theentire collection, with the exception of a few that had been hopelesslyunderexposed. Trouble with finding the detente position for the slide carriagereported for earlier/other models has been eliminated on this model. While Ican't just set it and walk away the way commercial processors would have todo, I'm thoroughly delighted with this unit. Thank you, Plustek & AOL.
источник
Profile no image

Плазмонавт-4LSHB

01.04.2009

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Does an excellent job. I had to disable my camera on the computer to get it working however. On the other hand I was guided very carefully and tactfully by a telephone service person who responded promptly (next day) to my e-mail for help.
источник
Profile no image

Кварковец-5MLJE

31.01.2009

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

This is marginal at best. If you are looking for high quality imaging, THIS IS NOT WHAT YOU WANT. It was so bad I returned it for a refund.If you purchase - here's what you'll experience:1. Inordinate amount of time to capture the image.2. Image quality is poor.Save your money.
источник
Profile no image

Сириус-0DIAX

07.02.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I've done some research on scanners but still wasn't sure if this was the right one.. That was until I set it up and used it. Great Unit! Made the right choice, good quality, very happy with the results.
источник
Profile no image

КиберНаблюдатель-2QQTD

13.06.2008

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

This is the second one of these I have purchased. The first on was windows only, but didn't say so on the Amazon site. I bought it through AntOnLine via Amazon marketplace, won't do that ever again. Ant would not take the return because they said they don't take returns on things with optics. So I gave that scanner as a gift to someone who uses windows. I bought this new scanner, now Mac compatible, but NO mac instructions in the docks. The driver disc had no Mac software. I tried the Silverfast software, again no Mac instructions, but DID find a Mac instal, after really looking around on the Silverfast disc. It installed well, weird install but worked fine, and now Silverfast talks to the scanner and I can finally scan!! But just to prove the Mac software still has need to improve, there is no quit command. You need to use command Q or force quit. But it works, it works well, and that's all I really care about.
источник
Profile no image

Сириус-7WVIU

31.01.2008

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Yes, It's slow but worth the wait. I left film photography several years ago to get "into" the digital era. But I missed the quality of Ilford and Kodak B&W film. Plus I have tons of Negatives laying around. As a result, I've taken my old film camera's out from storage (Nikon fe, Nikon f100) and began shooting several roles. I then decided to have most of my c41/b&w film developed at the local mini lab and scanned on a disc for digital editing... The best of both worlds I thought.But something was missing... I soon realized that taking film to get developed by others takes the fun out AND is frequently a hit or miss experience. So I dug into my storage room and found my developing/darkroom equipment and then began to do some research on quality 35mm scanners. Plustek was the best for it's price and was recently reviewed on Shutterbug mag. The downfall... Plustek Opticfilm 7200 wasn't MAC compatible. BUT... to my surprise this new model (7300) as well as the 7500 are now MAC compatible. Fairly quick and painless to set up and get started. And yes it takes some time to scan (especially at highter res) but I'm in no hurry especially since I'm so particular of results. I totally recommend this scanner to anyone looking to digitize old 35mm film or for those creative folks that want to use both analog and digital formats. Does the trick!
источник
Profile no image

Синтрон-1YPES

20.12.2008

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

This product works as advertised. Well made. Very easy to use although the provided software isn't. I just use Adobe Photoshop.
источник
Profile no image

НаноРейдер-2WANX

18.11.2008

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Easy to use with good quality results but it can be a time-consuming process. Probaby not the best for someone with thousands of 35mm negatives to process as there is no "batch processing"...
источник
Показаны отзывы 121-144 из 146.

Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой

8.9/10 баллов

Canon CanoScan LiDE 300

1163 отзывов

от 8986.00 руб.

8.7/10 баллов

Canon CanoScan LiDE 400

558 отзывов

от 10775.00 руб.

8.7/10 баллов

Epson WorkForce DS-870

23 отзывов

от 54585.00 руб.

8.6/10 баллов

Canon P-215II

167 отзывов

от 50650.00 руб.

8.6/10 баллов

Plustek OpticFilm 8200i SE

146 отзывов

от 75138.00 руб.

8.6/10 баллов

Plustek OpticFilm 8100

45 отзывов

от 64424.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

Plustek OpticSlim 2610

30 отзывов

от 33677.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

Epson WorkForce DS-1630

112 отзывов

от 24999.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

Epson Perfection V19

352 отзывов

от 11297.00 руб.

8.5/10 баллов

HP ScanJet Pro 2000 s2

23 отзывов

от 48200.00 руб.

8.4/10 баллов

Canon ImageFORMULA P-208II

38 отзывов

от 28490.00 руб.

8.2/10 баллов

Epson Perfection V39

615 отзывов

от 28067.00 руб.

8.2/10 баллов

Avision FB10

50 отзывов

от 9923.00 руб.

8.1/10 баллов

Avision FB2280E

7 отзывов

от 8650.00 руб.

8.1/10 баллов

Epson FastFoto FF-680W

330 отзывов

от 149900.00 руб.

8/10 баллов

Fujitsu FI-5000N скансервер

17 отзывов

от 5500.00 руб.

8/10 баллов

Canon DR-C225

33 отзывов

от 52809.00 руб.

7.9/10 баллов

Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai

29 отзывов

от 177809.00 руб.

7.8/10 баллов

Canon DR-M260

16 отзывов

от 141456.00 руб.

7.7/10 баллов

Canon image Formula DR-C240

10 отзывов

от 51897.00 руб.