Отзывы о Видеокамера Panasonic HC-V160
163 отзывов пользователей o Panasonic HC-V160
Пользовались
Panasonic HC-V160?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
НаноРейдер-9GMPE
20.03.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель , понравилась.
- + Матрица 1/3."Ширик" родной.ZOOM 22. Дублирующая запись на второй слот.Pre-Rec.
- - Матрица MOS. ЦЕНА явно завышена
Предыдущий "товарищ" назвал камеру "так себе". Или он работает на чужом проф.оборудовании, или его зависть гложет.
Пандорец-1ONIH
09.02.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Хорошее качество съемки
Функция O LUX (Ночью все идеально видно)
Отличный зум - - Управление слишком муторное
Запись в моно звуке
Тяжелая
Маленький экран...
Нейрон-7SNIP
19.04.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Это довольно мощная камера в рамках аналогового видео. при нулевом освящении нулевой шум(то есть нет мурашек). Качество идеальное. Звук отличный. имеется ручное W-T что позволяет мгновенно подстроить фокус.
- - при использовании более чем двухчасовой кассеты, допустим трёх или четырёхчасовая кассета у вас и вы вставили эту новенькую кассету в видеокамеру, если сразу же не нажать на запись и не удерживать в режиме записи секунд 30(ну или если находится в режиме...
ТехноНаблюдатель-9NYQN
23.01.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
При покупке, имейте в виду, это набор, не для стрижки головы поросшей огурцами! Если вы носите короткую причёску - подойдёт что бы ровнять. Набор по тому и не дорогой. К самой машинке нареканий нет, работает отлично. Там, грудь забрить, бороду подровнять от лишних волос - в самый раз. Но это, по факту вся её функция. Голову ей не брил, но знаю что лучше для подравнивания машинка. Вам не придётся ходить в парикмахерскую для этого) Тример... Удобен, прост. Один только момент расстраивает - он работает на батарейке. Аккумулятор в него не встроен. Набор понравился, всё что нужно есть. Если давать себе трезвый отчёт, для чего берёте. А мощные машинки, на кабеле, с грудой насадок... Это уже в той же парикмахерской. Так что...
Гелиос-4BCEA
06.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
По личному опыту пользования, дома для себя, самое то!Объясню почему.Во первых насадка для стрижки волос свыше 15 миллиметров будет бесполезной, потому как волос при такой длине заваливается проходя через насадку и ровной стрижки не получиться, в парикмахерской стригусь под самую длинную насадку 12 миллиметров, и то редко у кого бывает, остальное стригут ножницами. Так что если вам нужна длинна волос 3-4 сантиметра то таких насадок нет.Второе скорость ножей, да есть профессиональные машинки которые стригут быстро, но это опять же для салонов, вечером дома вы застрелитесь от треска проф. машинки.Эту машинку можно считать бесшумной!Аккумулятор считаю лишним, так как за неделю-две он разрядиться если убирать ее в тумбочку без зарядки, но если уж он есть, то пусть будет, лучше не хуже!
Туманник-0RANL
03.11.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Как она получила статус бестселлера просто уму не постижимо. Старая машинка которой уже лет 10 справится с задачей раз в 20 быстрее. Эта же бреет медленно, насадка для головы забивается просто не реально быстро. Единственный плюс индукционное ЗУ
Капеллан-2TQER
05.07.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Купили. попробовали и пришли к мнению. что данный комплекс очень подходит для мужчин с очень короткой стрижкой не более 1,5-2см длины. Триммер для носа работает без нарекания.а вот когда подстригаешь зону бикини специальной насадкой, то бес толку (проще пойти подбриться бритвой). И волосы другими насадками берет слабо (сравнивали с машинкой другой фирмы и более дорогой)
Туманник-4AATK
16.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Хороший, удобный набор. Что немаловажно, имеется подставка и емкость для насадок это очень удобно.
Квантум-8DVEG
05.05.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Положительные эмоции закончились ровно в тот момент, когда перенес отснятое видео на компьютер. На экране камеры ясное дело незаметно ни чего необычного, но при просмотре на мониторе оказалось что на записи много "шума", цвета бледные, ощущение размытости, вобщем неприятно для глаз смотреть. в минимальном разрешении 640х480 еще пойдет, но в HD качестве 1280х720 явно видно все косяки! Расстроил Панасоник таким низким качеством, товар успешно сдал, больше не возьму камеру этой фирмы, страшно уже ))
Астрономад-2GQON
21.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Хороший набор, со своей работой справляется "на ура", водонепроницаем, что очень кстати.
Вектрон-5ITVV
04.05.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Привез курьер через день после заказа, даже в моск. область доставили бесплатно. При выборе основными критериями были максимальное оптическое увеличение, приемлемое качество записи видео и небольшая цена. Данная камера максимально сочетает в себе все заданные условия! Зум действительно огромный, а в сочетании с оптическим стабилизатором можно с легкостью снимать на максимальном увеличении без штатива, реально впечатлило! В управлении и в меню все просто, на русском, чтоб понять не нужна инструкция даже. Заряжается от любого порта usb, например от ноута или от порта usb магнитолы в авто, очень удобно. Но в комплекте есть сетевой usb адаптер, он помощнее, зарядит раза в 2 быстрее! Единственное хотелось бы, чтоб изображение весило меньше, а то например в максимальном разрешении на карту 8 Гб помещается только чуть больше часа видео... Придется дополнительно сжимать на компе.
Альфа-Юнит-4DMRV
10.10.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
хорошая, качественная машинка.
Интеллектор-4DLQV
15.12.2019
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Посредсвенная модель
- + - Компактная, малая масса,
- Хороший оптический зум на x42.
- При длительной съемке нарезает файлы по 4 Гб,
- Удобное расположение кнопки включения и регулировки зума,
- Хорошее качество видео в FHD, но не фантастическое, из-за малой матрицы,
- Хороший стабилизатор...
Эксопилот-7ULVB
17.04.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + те камера панасоник на екассете контректно нет запчастей любых к нему
Астрон-4BLHL
14.09.2023
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + Хорошая камера для своих лет. До сих пор используем в работе.
- - Тяжелая, есть скрипы в кнопке зума при зуммировании, но это происходит со временем, хлипкий и самое главное если у вас она упадет с рук то сломается точно! Боится удара, падения с высоты от 50 см. Падала со стола, включается звук есть но видео сигнал пропал.
Аргонавт-0OAND
09.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
хорошая,простая микроволновка.купил маме в подарок.выглядит не убого,работает хорошо.
Интеллектор-5STAN
20.05.2020
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + Zoom очень хороший. Качество днём отличное.
- - Съемка ночью не сильно хорошего качества. Но снимает хорошо...
Небулоид-5BTOA
21.01.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Решил сменить утюг. Долго выбирал на маркете. Остановился на зтой модели.Почему Панасоник. Вот сколько вещей было от зтого бренда, все работают! Просто морально устарели и их приходиться сменять. Включил, нет запаха пластмассы, в отли-чии от некоторых брендах, всё заявленное работает, надеюсь так и будет работать.Выглядет как будто громоэдко, по сравнению со старым утюгом. Кнопки пара и брызгалкарасположенны удобно. Жене понравился.
Гелиос-4GKZD
11.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This beautiful camera is to me the pinnacle of "handheld" HD cameras for the event videographer (I quote "handheld" cause it's a bit hefty for long handholding). After years of prosumer HD cameras that never quite lived up to the promise of 1080p resolution, this generation of Panasonics nails it with both enough sensor resolution to max out the 1080p, and sufficient low-light capability that noisiness doesn't make the low-light footage look low-res. The lens range is stupendous, starting extremely wide and with tremendous reach, leaving one with no desire (in event situations) for anything else. It has the revered Panasonic "mojo" for color rendition and light handling. DRS is a tremendous help in the unpredictable and extreme world of event lighting (especially theatrical lighting). Manual controls are excellently laid out and intuitive; while assist features (especially focus-in-red) really are a step up in event situations. The various shooting modes and qualities provide a wide range of shooting possibilities, with a 32GB card providing from 3 to 12 hours of recording. Dual card slots with simultaneous or relay recording provide different types of security for event shoots. Finally, the lack of PCM audio on AVCHD camcorders was what made me continue to hold onto my HVX200A for a long time, but the 160's ability to record uncompressed was the final point that enabled me to completely separate from P2!
For those familiar with Panasonic prosumer cams, and thinking of upgrading, here are some comparisons:
HVX200A - finally free of P2 cards! I love the security of P2, and the speed of transfer when it's at its best, but I have gotten very tired of the P2 workflow. CardBus is a thing of the past, so one has to rely on ad-hoc solutions or expensive Panasonic readers. But mostly, decent SDHC cards in high capacities are fairly cheap, and GB for GB, of course, AVCHD stores a lot more. Which means, in practice, I don't have to spend hours after a long day of shooting to transfer and back up P2 cards so they will be available the next day. I had 108GB of P2 cards, which cost me thousands of dollars over the years, but were barely enough to cover 3 hours of shooting (and restricting me to 720pN for most things). I can now fit more footage, at better resolution, on a $25 Transcend SDXC card. I can keep enough cards around that I can offload them at my convenience, or even just keep 'em, or pass them on at the end of a shoot. The freedom, convenience, and flexibility is a world of difference. Also, in a pinch, I can buy media almost anywhere. I'll discuss image quality below... but feature-wise, the 160A surpasses the HVX in every way EXCEPT 4-channel audio recording.
HMC150 - The HMC150 shares the benefits of SDHC media (though it only has one slot and lacks relay or simultaneous recording). I discuss image quality below. But it is relatively feature-poor. And lacks PCM recording, which is important for musical events. The HMC is a much lighter and smaller camera, which is useful in some situations, though. While the HMC150 has DRS, it only works in 1080i and 720p60, neither of which are of use to me! On the AC160, DRS works in all modes.
HVX200A and HMC150 - Image Quality - The HVX and HMC share a sensor block, and thus have very similar image quality. First off, the AC160A has dramatically superior resolution. The 960x540 sensors in the HMC/HVX did not approach the limits of the HMC150's full-raster 1080 modes, or even the HVX's reduced (1280x1080) DVCProHD frame. In fact, even 720p on these cameras is noticeably less sharp than on the AC160. Put another way, the AC160 can stand a lot more reframing in post. And while the Ac160 is nominally less sensitive than the HVX/HMC, the image is so much cleaner and less noisy, even with moderate gain, that it trumps the older cameras in low-light capability. I get much more flexibility in post for grading than the HVX/HMC provided - less banding, less noise, more ability to increase levels and still appear natural. The only potential issues is are course CMOS jello and flashbanding - but these have not been an issue for me (though admittedly I'm almost always on a tripod). Otherwise, the images are beautiful, with all the familiar Panasonic image settings to "paint" your video, and the famous Panny organic look.
AC130 - I have an AC130 as well, and for most event situations the 160 doesn't provide a lot more. The variable frame rates might have some benefit for some event situations (weddings? some product/technique demonstrations?), but in general not so much for live events, and also... just shooting 60p gives you 95% of your slow motion needs for 30p or 24p projects. SDI? Never use it. But for me, the PCM audio was highly compelling. Otherwise, the two cameras are the same, with the same image quality. For two or three-camera shoots, I'd never want more than one 160 and the res
For those familiar with Panasonic prosumer cams, and thinking of upgrading, here are some comparisons:
HVX200A - finally free of P2 cards! I love the security of P2, and the speed of transfer when it's at its best, but I have gotten very tired of the P2 workflow. CardBus is a thing of the past, so one has to rely on ad-hoc solutions or expensive Panasonic readers. But mostly, decent SDHC cards in high capacities are fairly cheap, and GB for GB, of course, AVCHD stores a lot more. Which means, in practice, I don't have to spend hours after a long day of shooting to transfer and back up P2 cards so they will be available the next day. I had 108GB of P2 cards, which cost me thousands of dollars over the years, but were barely enough to cover 3 hours of shooting (and restricting me to 720pN for most things). I can now fit more footage, at better resolution, on a $25 Transcend SDXC card. I can keep enough cards around that I can offload them at my convenience, or even just keep 'em, or pass them on at the end of a shoot. The freedom, convenience, and flexibility is a world of difference. Also, in a pinch, I can buy media almost anywhere. I'll discuss image quality below... but feature-wise, the 160A surpasses the HVX in every way EXCEPT 4-channel audio recording.
HMC150 - The HMC150 shares the benefits of SDHC media (though it only has one slot and lacks relay or simultaneous recording). I discuss image quality below. But it is relatively feature-poor. And lacks PCM recording, which is important for musical events. The HMC is a much lighter and smaller camera, which is useful in some situations, though. While the HMC150 has DRS, it only works in 1080i and 720p60, neither of which are of use to me! On the AC160, DRS works in all modes.
HVX200A and HMC150 - Image Quality - The HVX and HMC share a sensor block, and thus have very similar image quality. First off, the AC160A has dramatically superior resolution. The 960x540 sensors in the HMC/HVX did not approach the limits of the HMC150's full-raster 1080 modes, or even the HVX's reduced (1280x1080) DVCProHD frame. In fact, even 720p on these cameras is noticeably less sharp than on the AC160. Put another way, the AC160 can stand a lot more reframing in post. And while the Ac160 is nominally less sensitive than the HVX/HMC, the image is so much cleaner and less noisy, even with moderate gain, that it trumps the older cameras in low-light capability. I get much more flexibility in post for grading than the HVX/HMC provided - less banding, less noise, more ability to increase levels and still appear natural. The only potential issues is are course CMOS jello and flashbanding - but these have not been an issue for me (though admittedly I'm almost always on a tripod). Otherwise, the images are beautiful, with all the familiar Panasonic image settings to "paint" your video, and the famous Panny organic look.
AC130 - I have an AC130 as well, and for most event situations the 160 doesn't provide a lot more. The variable frame rates might have some benefit for some event situations (weddings? some product/technique demonstrations?), but in general not so much for live events, and also... just shooting 60p gives you 95% of your slow motion needs for 30p or 24p projects. SDI? Never use it. But for me, the PCM audio was highly compelling. Otherwise, the two cameras are the same, with the same image quality. For two or three-camera shoots, I'd never want more than one 160 and the res
Дроид-4LUTU
12.12.2014
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Are you shooting on a DSLR? If so you'll love this package. All the extra goodies are really stuff you'd use for a DSLR. The camera bag is a Vivitar bag. The tripod is wayyy too weak for holding the AG-AC160. You would actually put your camera in jeopardy if you put it on this tripod!
I believe the lenses will work on the camera. I haven't fully checked out the camera yet, but I assume it will work fine. The shipment did come very quickly.
Bottom line: Don't buy this package if you think It'll make you a professional shooter overnight.
I believe the lenses will work on the camera. I haven't fully checked out the camera yet, but I assume it will work fine. The shipment did come very quickly.
Bottom line: Don't buy this package if you think It'll make you a professional shooter overnight.
Кронос-9GGGZ
08.10.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I love this camera. Every time I pull it out of the bag, which is every day because I'm a news videographer, I feel good. Another opportunity to record great video.
I had the AG-AC130 (and loved it) but decided to spring for the 160A when it came out. So far I've shot everything in 1080 60p. The quality is terrific. I FTP my news video to the station in an MP4 format, so the 28mbps is higher than I need.
I'm using the new expanded focus feature on the 160A instead of the focus-in-red. I find that with EFV detail on, the image sort of "blooms" when you lock it in and that's the best way for me to get crisp images. However, I used to use the focus-in-red function and liked it too. The only thing about focus-in-red is that if you use it at the same time as EVF detail, you get a much wider range of things that appear in focus. If you use focus-in-red, turn off the EVF detail.
I also think the LCD on the 160A offers a better color image. On my old 130A, the color on the LCD had a greenish cast to it so I configured the LCD to operate in black and white. That was good in tandem with the focus-in-red function. But with the 160A, I'm using color in the LCD to give me more peace of mind about white balance. The colors in the LCD are very vivid at 0 settings, so I have dropped the color to -4 and upped the contrast to +4. I wish I could adjust the color settings for the LCD but you don't get that option.
But you get many, many options for adjusting the camera's images and I have played around with them a lot. I was shooting material with the DRS function on, which really boosts the brightness of the image, but you get more noise in the darker areas of the picture. So right now I'm using a BPRESS setting with the mid knee option. Blacks are better and the overall picture is less noisy.
The camera is just the right size - not so small that you feel like it's a toy camera but small enough, and light enough, to be portable when you're running around shooting news. The optical image stabilizer is terrific. I use it all the time when I'm hand-holding the camera. I also bought a Manfrotto monopod with a fluid head (costs $245 at B & H) and love using it with the OIS for quick interviews. The shot looks as if it's on a tripod and the monopod is quicker to use than a tripod and more portable.
I can't say enough about the ability to use SDHC cards in this camera, as well as the 130. I'm using Class 10 cards (Transcend, Sandisk and PNY) and all have worked flawlessly. I have used the function that allows you to record simultaneously on two cards, but typically set the camera to relay record so it transfers to the next card if one runs out of space. I just bought an SDXC UHS-1 card, 95 mb/s, (from Amazon) and am waiting for it to arrive. Glad to have the option of using very fast cards with tons of space.
Finally, kudos to Amazon for its customer service. When I bought the 160A on Amazon, the transaction was quick, easy and straightforward. The camera arrived faster than I expected. Plus, I had more peace of mind that Amazon would back me if there was an issue. Amazon sets the new standard for customer service in the 21st Century.
I had the AG-AC130 (and loved it) but decided to spring for the 160A when it came out. So far I've shot everything in 1080 60p. The quality is terrific. I FTP my news video to the station in an MP4 format, so the 28mbps is higher than I need.
I'm using the new expanded focus feature on the 160A instead of the focus-in-red. I find that with EFV detail on, the image sort of "blooms" when you lock it in and that's the best way for me to get crisp images. However, I used to use the focus-in-red function and liked it too. The only thing about focus-in-red is that if you use it at the same time as EVF detail, you get a much wider range of things that appear in focus. If you use focus-in-red, turn off the EVF detail.
I also think the LCD on the 160A offers a better color image. On my old 130A, the color on the LCD had a greenish cast to it so I configured the LCD to operate in black and white. That was good in tandem with the focus-in-red function. But with the 160A, I'm using color in the LCD to give me more peace of mind about white balance. The colors in the LCD are very vivid at 0 settings, so I have dropped the color to -4 and upped the contrast to +4. I wish I could adjust the color settings for the LCD but you don't get that option.
But you get many, many options for adjusting the camera's images and I have played around with them a lot. I was shooting material with the DRS function on, which really boosts the brightness of the image, but you get more noise in the darker areas of the picture. So right now I'm using a BPRESS setting with the mid knee option. Blacks are better and the overall picture is less noisy.
The camera is just the right size - not so small that you feel like it's a toy camera but small enough, and light enough, to be portable when you're running around shooting news. The optical image stabilizer is terrific. I use it all the time when I'm hand-holding the camera. I also bought a Manfrotto monopod with a fluid head (costs $245 at B & H) and love using it with the OIS for quick interviews. The shot looks as if it's on a tripod and the monopod is quicker to use than a tripod and more portable.
I can't say enough about the ability to use SDHC cards in this camera, as well as the 130. I'm using Class 10 cards (Transcend, Sandisk and PNY) and all have worked flawlessly. I have used the function that allows you to record simultaneously on two cards, but typically set the camera to relay record so it transfers to the next card if one runs out of space. I just bought an SDXC UHS-1 card, 95 mb/s, (from Amazon) and am waiting for it to arrive. Glad to have the option of using very fast cards with tons of space.
Finally, kudos to Amazon for its customer service. When I bought the 160A on Amazon, the transaction was quick, easy and straightforward. The camera arrived faster than I expected. Plus, I had more peace of mind that Amazon would back me if there was an issue. Amazon sets the new standard for customer service in the 21st Century.
Квантум-2YVHE
27.12.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Great camera, easy to use. We do get some contrast issues with darker colors though. Blacks look pixilated.
НаноПилигрим-8MMWP
20.12.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Beacuse when iam shooting in aparticular place where there is not a smooth hydro electric power supply, I prefer to be equiped with long hours of portable battery pack,. My choice is 6600mah, which i have just received from you. They are professinally well made and Iam excited about it.
Аэронавт-2VJKD
25.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I am very satisfied with the quality, craftsmanship durability of the craftsmanship, performance, and expertise that this camera continuously delivers. Great job Panasonic; I am proud so far.
Показаны отзывы 121-144 из 163.
