Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D610 Body

I have been a Nikon fan since I could afford to buy my first camera - a Nikon F3HP - an outstanding camera that was bullet-proof. I became an early digital convert and have been waiting patiently for a full-frame digital camera that made sense for me to buy and leverage my base of full frame lenses. i've never liked the DX format when it comes to wide angle shots. The specs of the D600 and D800 are outstanding and both cameras feel great, but I watched in disbelief as Nikon let this D600 shutter issue play out on the Internet. Now it appears to be addressed with the D610 and my experience with the camera has been excellent. My concern now is that a company that manages product issues in such poor fashion with their loyal customer base is probably going to fail in long run. The market is too competitive. Canon and Sony and others have great products. Nikon needs to treat its customers better if is going to survive as a company. The D600 issue was such a basic product/PR issue and Nikon seemed clueless about doing the right thing. I would have bought the 600 or 800 earlier if this issue hadn't played out over the past year, but I am hesitant to invest further in such a poorly managed company. Nikon should be doing something for its d600 owners --- trade-in, credit, rebuild --- and should start by admitting and managing the issue straight up. Product issues happen --- Nikon needs to show that it has the integrity to do the right thing to maintain its brand and customer base. I can assume from Nikon's past history that if there's a problem with the D610, then they will burry their heads and focus on a D620. So, the D610 gets 5 stars for now but the company behind it gets 1 star, averaging out to 3 stars.

I'm changing my former 1 star review. Why did I give them a 1 star review? Because I was very upset with Nikon's handling of the D600, the camera that's nearly identical to this one. They never admitted a problem, gave simple "have you tried not changing the lenses in a dust filled area?" responses, and after attempting to fix my D600 a few times, I have simply given up on that and came to an understanding with Nikon. That's all I will say about that.The D610 on its own merits is a solid 4.25 star full frame camera. Why not 5 star? because it's still using the same sensor as the D600 which came out last year. It's a year old sensor being sold today for $100 cheaper than the D610 did initially. The AF points are still somewhat centered in the middle but in the real world, very usable. I should know, I've used the D600 for a year. The sensor is still one of the best full frame ones out there so having used the D600 and spending some time with the D610, it will likely be my next camera.I wish it was't like this. I wish I would have just bought the D600 and there were no issues and Nikon would have offered a recall but they didn't. Still, I don't see myself ever going to Canon (that was a bluff) - Sony, maybe but not Canon. No need to bash Nikon anymore. They have learned their lesson hopefully. They have brought dishonor to themselves with the D600 so maybe now they will follow the righteous path.Update *March 2014*I was looking for a camera to replace my D600 and decided to buy the D610 after the first price drop. This really is what the D600 SHOULD have been. No dust or oil. Not thrilled that I'm using 2 year old technology, but that's all Nikon has now.

First off, I know it's crazy talk but, I think Amazon should only allow customers to review here if they actually own the camera. If you own the D600 and are unhappy with it, please review it there.I'm an amateur at photography and upgraded from the entry level D3100. This was definitely an overkill upgrade but I've always wanted to take professional grade photos. I took the Michael Maven online D600 class which shows all features and settings (highly recommended) and purchased a few FX lenses: 1.4 50mm prime, 28-70mm 2.8 (refurbished), and a 70-300 4.5 VR2. I specifically waited until this camera came out due to all of the reported dust and oil issues from the D600. After about 2000 shots, no dust or oil issues at all.As expected, picture quality is excellent. There is a noticeable difference in contrast from my DX, even in auto mode. The colors just seem to pop. Also as expected, low light shots are brighter and can be shot with lower ISOs. I'm not super impressed with the low light auto white balance but it's possible that it's on par with every other DSLR. I just shoot in RAW so I can modify the white balance and exposure after the fact. The auto white balance was supposedly modified from the D600 so not sure if it's improved or they made it worse!Overall it's a great camera and probably was a smart decision vs. the Canon 6D. Seems like the Canon performs better in low light and has better video. I just wasn't impressed with any photo samples from it.

***Be wary!! Some models come with a broken diopter control! I got one***Compared to the D700:Pros:-Better in low light.-Nice file size.-Video capability.Cons:-D700's performance is a lot better (faster FPS w/MB-D10 and reacts faster)-Not as sturdy. Feels like a D200.-SD Cards and controls need getting used to.*I bought this camera mainly for non-sports usage. I tried it on a couple of soccer games and noticed that on occasional sequence shots, the first frame will be about a third of a stop darker than the following frames. Happened multiple times. Might stick with not shooting fast action sports with it because it doesn't seem to have that problem otherwise.Update - 3/20:-Upset the price dropped $100 after I bought it.-After running over 10k photos through the camera, I still like the file size, but I can't trust the camera to do the job with it's auto-focus on objects that are moving around a lot. You would think that after a seven-plus year difference between it and the D700, the auto focus technology would be a lot better. It's not. It's a step back.-The Auto WB is actually pretty good. Although, the yellowish/green cast of the LCD on the back would tell you different.

I just bought the D610 as a backup for my D800 and for macro photography. The D610 is a great camera and the 24.3 mp sensor is much more forgiving than the D800's, especially for hand-held, natural light macro. And; my 65 year neck is very grateful; it's quite a bit lighter than the D800. Coupled with my 60mm micro-nikkor "G" lens, it's turning into a superb "walking around" camera. So far, after about a week, I've found the image quality to be excellent and my images are very sharp with the micro-nikkor. It's also very quiet. I'm used to the D800, which has a really noisy shutter release guaranteed to scare all the wildlife away.I only have two minor "gee, I wish it would do this" comments. The auto-bracket function limits you to only 3 frames, at 0.3, 0.7, 1, 2 or 3 ev; not a deal-beaker, but I like to do HDR and I wish Nikon had designed the camera to do 5, or better yet, 7 frames. The D800 will allow you to auto-bracket up to 9 frames but at no more than 1 ev increments. A little consistency, Nikon, please! Second, there doesn't seem to be a way of programming the multi-selector center button so that pushing it in playback mode immediately brings up the luminance histogram. You can do this with the D800 and I find it very convenient. Still the D610 costs a third less, so again, no deal-breaker.BTW, a bit of advice: If you want more objective reviews on the D610, go visit the product page on the B&H Photo's website, in addition to Amazon's.

As the title says, this camera has "fixed" the problems that plagued the D600. I had purchased the D600 as a pre-order when it first came out. I had sensor oil spots within the first 100 images and I dealt with spending endless amounts of time cleaning up my images in Photoshop. I had over 10,000 actuations on it (with sports photography) and had returned it to Nikon 5 times for sensor cleanings. Actually, on the 4th return they replaced the shutter and the spots still returned. So with my 1 yr. warranty approaching this fall I put my foot down with them and they offered me a full refund, which I took. This was in September. I heard the rumors about the D610 and waited until I could read a few reviews and tests on it. Satisified with what I was seeing on the reviews I went ahead and purchased the D610 in November. While I haven't had time to use it extensively since I received it I DO have about 500 actuations on my D610 and so far so good. NO nasty oil spots. It is such a pleasure to have clean images again. I am very happy so far with the purchase. I just wish the Nikon haters who don't even own it would stop posting all of their negative crap and trying to ruin the camera. This camera is fine and has addressed the issues that the D600 had.

I had D300 for five years, just bought D610 this month. Image quality appear to be twice better than D300. I'm happy to move to FX. I just wish it has built-in WIFI. Maybe at this point Nikon cares more about image quality than WIFI. The WU-1B device does not connect to PC using a router, only mobile devices. I bought Nikon 1.8 and 2.8 lens. Aperture mode doesn't appear consistent in exposure level from wide opening to smaller apertures. The image taken at wide open appears to be always slightly darker than the rest. It's only slightly but no big deal. It can be fixable by adjusting shutter speed or ISO. I tested aperture mode range using D300 and D7100 and it appears to produce the same results so I would guess it's the general Nikon camera itself. Nikon probably thinks it's no big deal fixing this little problem that no one has complained about or notice. In White Balance, it has incandescent and no tungsten like Canon camera has. It appears slightly yellow, not white enough, but will try to test it some more. I would recommend the camera for excellent image quality but warn it has no built-in WIFI. Not many people are happy with WU-1B.

Have been using DX Nikons since the D70, and was ready to be blown away by the difference in FX with the 610, but quite the opposite was the case. Aside from the added pixels per image and a slightly more spacious viewfinder, I could not find an additional $800-900-worth of value over the D7000 I now own. Amazingly, the 610, together with a 70-300 VR FX zoom, created a seriously vignetted image on a clear, sunny day in one of my test runs, something I never get with a DX body. Internal camera controls may have been able to deal with that flaw, but why should I even have to worry about it? Never had to with film cameras... Anyway, my curiosity with respect to FX has been completely satisfied and I won't have to spend any more in the future to try it again. However, kudos to Amazon for allowing me to return it and even refunding shipping for both directions! Now that's a big deal!

Some have asked if there was any chance Nikon was going to make good for the customers duped into buying the Nikon D600. I took the liberty of posting my question to Nikon and the company's reply. You can be the judge. I suspect I'll have to become a Canon user.Question:Since everyone on the photography planet knows that the D610 was developed to address the nasty and low quality problems of the dust/oil issues of the Nikon D600 will Nikon be offering a trade in program for those of us who had the unfortunate lack of foresight to purchase the D600 in the first place?Granted it would require a Herculean effort to get upper management to admit to the problem and to provide a redress that would show forthright corporate character traits, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to ask. Offering such a program would of course be admitting a flaw but also purchasing untold amounts of goodwill and positive PR for years to come.Answer:Response Via Email (James W.) 10/23/2013 04:02 PMHello Robert Gaskin,Thank you for contacting Nikon Customer Support, I'll be happy to assist you.Nikon has, and will continue to provide quality service to all of our D600 owners. We have never and will not now, however, offer a trade-in program.Don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or concerns, below I have attached a link with contact information:[...]Incident Number: 131022-000623Best Regards,James W.Nikon Technical Support

After having some challenges with my last Nikon (D300), I thought it might have been an isolated issue. I was very excited to order and receive my Nikon D610 thinking the issues with the D600 were resolved. However, out of the box, the viewfinder was completely blurry.....couldn't see a thing. Tried adjusting with the diopter control, looked on Nikon support site, and nothing worked to correct it. After doing some research online, it appears I'm not the only one to have this issue. I was also unhappy with the lens hood included with the 24-85mm lens. It was so loose, it kept rotating around and fell off a few times. I REALLY wanted to like this camera and there are a lot things I like about Nikon, but feel their quality has really suffered in the last few years. With the price of the Canon 6D dropping today, I'm sending this Nikon back and moving to Canon. I have always felt the brands were close, but this has put me over the edge toward Canon.

I'd owned a D7000 for a few years and it was far and away my best experience thus far with any digital camera. My initial idea was to simply sell my 7000 and change to a 7100. Upon the fast sale of my 7000, I was just about set to buy a 7100 when once again it hit me..do I want to go FX? I'd heard of the issues with the D600, and then realized the D610 had been released, which seemed clearly as a means of fixing the shutter debris issue that many had talked about on the 600.I read many of the new reviews on the 610 and it seemed clear that the issue had been resolved, so I purchased one.I of course checked the sensor right off, it was spotless...after around 1000 shots it remains spotless, actually it's cleaner than my D7000 typically was. I'd cleaned the D7000 sensor a couple times in 3 years.The operation of the D610 is so similar to my 7000 that there's almost zero learning curve. The low light performance is just another notch better than my 7000.All in all I'm extremely happy with it. ..but now I've got to consider some FX glass.

In my previous post, I wrote about the strange color band found in my long exposure shots with the d610, i.e. 2+ minutes. I posted a complaint about it on my instagram, and a friend gave me some insight about this issue. It turns out that the strange color band was the result of light leaking into the EYEPIECE. When you are doing a long exposure shot, make sure you use your eye piece cover or else light will leak into it and onto your sensor. In addition, I have read that this issue happens to other nikon's higher end cameras, like the d700. Still, I think this is really poor designing on nikon's part. Why does my entry level nikon d7000 have no issue with light leaking into the eyepiece yet a more expensive, semi pro d610 have this issue is beyond me. Maybe it was a marketing strategy. Maybe they want the inconvenience of placing on that eyepiece every time we shoot long expo so it will annoy us enough to buy more expensive nikon cameras like the D3x or something. But in terms of the camera's performance and image quality, I am pleased with the d610 results. I even like the image quality of this camera more than canon's 5d mark iii, a 3400$ camera compared to 2000$.Sample pics of color bands:[...][...][...]

I wanted - really wanted - to buy the 600 a year ago but like most of you, was scared by the thousands of negative reviews for white balance issues and dust spots. So I struggled through 12 months with my trusty Nikon D90 - anxiously awaiting for Nikon to do something. The 610 was, eventually, their response. Even though they never admitted (publically) an issue, the creation of this model is undeniable proof that the 600 was flawed. I hope Nikon suffers because of this - its a classic example of how not to respond to a flawed product. I was very close to switching to Canon at one point.I'm glad I waited - so far, I can find no issues with this camera. The D600 is a much better solution for me than the D800 simply because I don't need the 36MP sensor - which is fantastic but creates larger file sizes than I really need for the type of photography that I do. You can read all the super tech opinions on other reviews - I'd just be echo-ing their opinions. I'll simply add that if you were like me and waiting for the D600 fiasco to reach an acceptable solution - the 610 is your answer.

What a nightmare! We have had our D600 for a year and it's been into the shop three times for the same issue. Oil drops on the sensor. Nikon replaced the shutter but has taken a new response as of today. They say some dust is normal and that there is software out there to remove spots if needed. WOW! I had a D200 and cleaned the sensor ONCE in five years, and this camera has needed cleaning 30-45 days after I receive it back from the factory three times in a row. If this is normal dust, why is it accumulating all in the left, upper side of the picture? Why are others having so many issues? Why is there a new D610 replacement that has a new shutter mechanism, it was released in a year with little upgrade otherwise? Mnnn, could it be Nikon is trying to get out of the D600 business because the camera is defective and they can't fix the problem? They don't care, that is the worse part. At this point, I would guide you to Canon. Nikon doesn't stand behind their products. This particular issue is ripe for a class action suit in my opinion. If the bad reviews were mixed, I would say it's bad luck. But just about every bad review has the same issue with oil on the sensor.

I ordered a D610 and received it on Jan 26th. Charged up the battery and tried to use it. Viewfinder was very blurry, could not be resolved by using the diopler adjustment. Called Amazon and they sent me another one ASAP. I was to have UPS pick up the package at my home. I picked up the second one at the UPS office on Jan 28th. Again camera has a blurry viewfinder. Spoke to several people at Nikon Service. Nothing they had me try worked. They wanted me to send it in, to them, for repair. I did not want to wait a couple of months for this. Contacted Amazon to return the 2nd one, tried to change to get a D800. 2 strikes and the 610 was out. Amazon said I had to return the 2nd camera at my expense, It has been sent back costing me over $47. I lost my home to a fire on Dec 11th, need a camera to get back to doing some work, until insurance replaces my lost equipment. I have never had this much problem in 33 yrs of Nikon camera usage.

Beware: All the bad reviews on Amazon are backlash of issues with D600. This version is supposed to fix those issues and the fix is working perfectly :)I upgraded from D3100 to D610 a few months ago. I love this camera. The images I get from this are so much better. I love the U1/U2 modes, the flash commander and infrared remote support. Much higher percentage of pictures from this camera become popular on 500px compared to D3100. Friends and family have been loving the pictures much more too.For the record I have only been using Nikon 28-300mm lens along with this body.

Edit for clarity: I do actually own the D610.Nikon has finally got it right with the D610 - it is truly a fantastic camera, and that's quite a statement coming from a former D600 owner like myself.The D600 was an absolute debacle; after 2 replacements I still had massive dust and oil problems. I strongly disagree with the way Nikon "handled" the D600 problem, but people should know that the D610 is truly a fantastic camera. I was motivated to write this review after I saw numerous people writing poor reviews of the D610 based on their disapproval of Nikon's actions.I don't think it's fair to criticize the D610 based on the shortcomings of its predecessor, so I wanted to take the time to say that all of the problems I had with the D600 seem to have been solved with this camera. My D610 produces absolutely fantastic images and there hasn't been a hint of the dust or oil problems that plagued the D600.For detailed analysis of this camera and its image quality, check out DXOmark.com; they do a much better job of objectively reviewing cameras than I can. But in my opinion the D610 is an excellent camera. I highly recommend it.

I bought the 600 and sent it back 4 times for repair and replacement. Ultimately I demanded and Nikon agreed to give me my money back. I decided being an early adopter was not a good strategy. So when the 610 came out I waited several months to see if this camera repaired the dust/spot issue. I really didn't want all the megapixels of the 800. The 600/610 seemed to hit a sweet spot in affordability and megapixels. I had this camera a few weeks and I began noticing dust through out the sensor. I decided it must be the lens. So I cleaned three lenses thoroughly and tried each--50 mm, 28 to 300 and 14 to 24. Each image taken, no matter the lens showed an increasing accumulation of dust in the upper left hand corner. Ground hog day all over again. I sent it back and bought the 800e and so far I am a happy camper but have a late/hate relationship with Nikon.

I'm a longtime Amazon customer but they screwed up on this one. I purchased a new camera and what they sent me was a used one with 769 shutter clicks! Not even factory refurbished. Fingerprints all over it. Nothing sealed. I sent it back and ordered it from B&H Photo. Same price as Amazon but they also throw in-free spare battery-free Ruggard camera bag-free 16 GB memory cardI don't have any stake in B&H and I am not benefiting from sending people there, but I recognize superior service and wanted to pass this along.

It's interesting to see Nikon releasing a faulty product into the marketplace...only to fix it one year later with a new product and not addressing the defect in the original product!!This may be a relatively small blip for Nikon, however, I wonder how much they care about people who invested $2K and have to live with a badly designed product.I own a D600 and have had to send it in for sensor muck issues for over 5 times in less than an year. The muck issue crops even after the sensor and shutter mechanism are replaced - Nikon claims to have replaced the my D600's sensor at least two times, however, the dust keeps cropping up.This speaks volumes about how Nikon chooses to run their product development and the sort of company they are turning into. As a consumer, I have no option but to either live with a product with a design flaw or spend another $2K on the improvement - or maybe dump the brand, go Canon....The clear message is that, with Nikon, "Brand loyalty does not equate to Customer Service"...

I really like this camera. I shoot with Nikon D3, D3s, D800e and I needed another full frame camera for portraits and bridal shots with a little more resolution than my D3 series cameras and the image quality is great with the D610. My only gripe about the camera is the maximum shutter of 1/4000 of a second. I love to shoot fast primes wide open in bright sunlight and 1/4000 of a second is not fast enough. Great studio camera.

I don't think I can say anything bad about this camera. I upgraded from the D90, and this camera is leaps and bounds beyond what I've been use to. Much better picture quality in low lighting with minimal grain at high ISO. The sharpness and picture quality in general is amazing. I can zoom in 100X, and have the eyes of my clients still be tack sharp.This is a great camera for me as I am starting my own small business in portraiture. I am very pleased with this purchase, and will probably end up buying a second down the road.

nikon gets one star because there's no way of giving it a zero. a camera is only as good as the company that stands behind it. i have had other nikons, and these bums really do not have any respect for their loyal consumers.i bought a couple of cameras that substituted inches for centimeters in the advertising, e.g., promising photo-quality exposures up to 16 x 20 inches when the fact was 16 x 20 centimeters. these were small, compact cameras.my first nikon was the old analog F-5. THAT was a camera, but those days are long gone now. Today, upper management is more concerned with how much of a bonus they'll walk away with instead of returning customers.SHAME on you Nikon. and SHAME on you AMAZON for not taking care of your customers by preventing thieving manufacturers like NIKON from selling their goods on your web site.Time to buy a CANON on another web site.

As a Nikon D600 owner I should have just as much right as Nikon, by them completely scrapping the D600 and replacing it with the D610. Therefor, I should be given the option to either refund my whole purchase amount, or given credit towards trading in my malfunction Nikon D600 for any other Nikon camera of my choice. It?s absurd for a multi-national corporation like Nikon to completely ignore all the D600 owners complaints and not address them properly in the form of a recall or service advisory. Nikon neglect their clients who have put faith in them in the form of their hard earned money, and decided to re-release the D600 with a new shutter mechanism and name it the D610. All while still not addressing us the D600 owners and early adopters. DSLR purchases such as this are a once every 10 year purchase for many including me, I have dreamed and saved up in order to own a Full-Frame camera only to be let down and negligent by Nikon.