Отзывы о Веб-Камера Logitech C920
1092 отзывов пользователей o Logitech C920
Пользовались
Logitech C920?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Тимофей Яковлев
26.07.2025
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + Не высокая цена
- - Не слишком высокое качество
Михаил Шевченко
31.07.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Хорошее качество картинки.
- - Микрофон тиховат (слушатели немного жалуются).
Владислав
12.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Хорошая картинка, приличный звук, симпатичный дизайн
- - Немного есть гул, но я полагаю, это неизбежность встроенного микрофона
Марина Эдуардовна Сысоева (Чуйко)
12.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + отличная камера
Анастасия Павлова
12.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Все работает как надо, цена приятная
- - Долгая доставка , но цена компенсирует ожидание
O B
12.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Высокое качество изображения даже при низком уровне освещения. Автофокус - четкость там где нужно (на лице). Полная совместимость с Ubuntu/Debian.
Workpop
12.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Спасибо, подключил, доволен
Андрей В.
28.05.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + лучшая за свои деньги
- - не нашел
Артем Гольцов
31.05.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + За свои деньги топ
Василий Дадонов
05.06.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + сын доволен
popavutin
06.06.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Качество и надежность за эту цену
Вячеслав Лазарев
09.06.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + хорошее качество, легко устанавливается
Роман Быковский
11.06.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Хорошая камера, качество нормально, оригинальность не понятна, на камере и коробке разные серийные номера
Скроменый эксперт
27.09.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Разница действительно ощутима! Качество намного лучше. Если вечером шли приличные шумы и было размазано изображение,то сейчас все четко! А Днем уверенна будет вообще чудо изображение! Красивый дизайн, прорезиненные ножки. Приятное синее свечение при работе! Звук намного четче и громче, но других отличий пока не заметила. В общем я не пожалела, что теперь она у меня есть! Доставка прошла раньше срока :D В общем все отлично! ;) в общем 5+ ! Минусов не нашла!
GOF
09.03.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Цена - качество, но для лучшего достижения нужен хороший свет, а так я доволен камерой, одобряю!
Юлия К.
11.02.2019
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Запись видео в программе Webcam Software по сравнению с C270: цветопередача более естественная, чёткость и резкость более высокие, при движении в кадре не смазывает изображение, нет рывков, угол обзора шире. Захватывает всю комнату и меня в ней, а не только одно лицо во весь экран (хотя в скайпе это не столь сильно проявляется). (Стоит на мониторе параллельно с С270). Хорошее большое крепление. Цепляется не только на монитор, а также и на толстую старую плазму, она у меня в качестве дополнительного монитора. Забавно сделан индикатор работы камеры в виде красного ободка вокруг логотипа. Длинный шнур. Обе камеры HD720p. Pro 9000 2 Mp, а C270 3 Mp. По всем показтелям Logitech Webcam...
Frederik Palzer
09.03.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- - нет
Егор
09.03.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Отличное качество, герцовка тоже хорошая
- - Нету шторки чтобы закрывать обьектив
Александр
20.11.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Качество видео до сих пор устраивает. Камера работает лет 10, может чуть больше. Но нужно обязательно ставить драйвер и ПО от Logitech. Достойное качество изображения даже при слабом освещении. Хороший встроенный микрофон.
- - Нет обновлений программного обеспечения года так с 2012, рано забросили достойный продукт. При слабом освещении не всегда...
Анастасия С.
09.03.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Очень хорошее качество, простая установка. Советую к покупке !!
Антон М.
09.03.2024
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + Шикарная Картинка
- - Нет программного обеспечения в комплекте а в интернете пока найдешь 99 сайтов обойдешь
Скроменый эксперт
21.05.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've been testing and using the Logitech C920 for a week now. This is really a nice little camera! It takes good, sharp video, and the Logitech Webcam Software (LWS), works fine, though a bit limited in settings.For those wanting some tech specs, I ran a bunch of tests and analyzed the files with MediaInfo.LWS provides 4 modes: 360p (640x360 WMV), 480p (864x480 WMV), 720p (1280x720 MP4/AVC), and 1080p (1920x1080 MP4/AVC).In "Preferences," under the "Quick Capture" tab, it provides 3 audio and 3 video quality settings:Audio:Good (16) -- 16kHz at 20kbps (mushy)Better (32) -- 32kHz at 48kbps (fine for voice)Best (48) -- 48kHz at 191kbps (DVD quality)-- These only matter at 360p and 480p.-- In the higher modes, the audio (AAC) is always 48kHz at 99kbps (vbr), no matter where you set the audio quality setting (bug?).kbps and frame rates : ( 360p WMV / 480p WMV / 720p MP4-AVC / 1080p MP4-AVC )Standard (small file): 549 at 15 / 1155 at 15 / 2000 at 30 / 3000 at 30High Q (medium file): 943 at 15 / 2848 at 15 / 3000 at 30 / 4000 at 30Lossless (large file): 1723 at 15 / 3848 at 15 / 4000 at 30 / 6000 at 30-- In 360 and 480, the video bit rate will vary quite a bit depending on the amount of motion in the video. Frame rate is constant at 15.-- In 720 and 1080, the bit rate is constant, and the frame rate is constant at 30, tho MediaInfo sometimes shows it as variable.So you can see the highest quality mode is 1080p at 6000kbps at 30fps, which is probably what you wanna use if you're gonna pull it into an editor, and then spit out the results at say, 2000, which makes a good quality video at a reasonable file size for uploading to YT, etc.I don't know what they mean by "lossless," because what the software calls "lossless" is a mere 4-6 Mbps, highly compressed by the camera. But it's more than good enough.For the two AVC modes, the camera is putting out profile Baseline @ L4.0, no CABAC, 1 Reference Frame, CBR, and CFR. The color model is YUV 4:2:0, 8-bits, Progressive, as expected. This profile is widely compatible with many consumer HD video devices and software players.If you're gonna simply downsample the bitrate with Handbrake, you should make a profile that matches what the hardware in the camera puts out. Make your Handbrake (v0.9.6+) profile like this: -f mp4 -O --crop 0:0:0:0 --strict-anamorphic -e x264 -b 1500 --vfr -a 1 -E copy:aac -B 0 -6 auto -R Auto -D 0 --gain=0 --audio-copy-mask none -x bframes=0:8x8dct=0:cabac=0:weightp=0:ref=4:psy-rd=1.00,0.15 --verbose=1 (where -b = bitrate and -E copy:aac = audio pass-through). Note that I set RefFrames to 4, as it falls back to L3.1 if the ref is left at 1.What about other video resolutions and modes? Running other capture software, like BB Flashback or AVS Video Recorder, you can pick all resolutions from 160x90 to 2304x1536 (at 2 fps) and the C920 will switch to any of them -- so, yes, it will do all the 4:3 modes like 640x480, but not with LWS. There's no reason they couldn't put some common 4:3 modes in it, because the camera will do'em all, and wide-screen isn't always desirable.Does the camera put out raw video in the non-AVC modes, like a regular webcam? In LWS my processor (dual 3.06GHz) runs about 25% capturing 1080p, but about 45% capturing 480p. In other capture software, capturing 1080p in mjpeg or mpeg2/xvid maxes out the processor and stutters badly. So it would appear that the camera's hardware compression only kicks in with 720p and 1080p AVC, and a good thing it does! My computer (and its USB2) won't handle raw 1080p/30 video.Snapshots, using LWS (all JPG, Q unknown and not settable):Low: 1920x1080 (2MP, 472kB), a bit blurry in the detailsMed: 2304x1536 (3MP, 649kB), the native resolution of the image sensorLrg: 3280x1845 (6MP, 1047kB), interpolatedMax: 5168x2907 (15MP, 1984kB), interpolated-- I can see no detail difference in medium, large, and max, so interpolation is useless (as expected).-- I took the sharpest snapshot at 2304x1536 (its native res.) in another capture program that will save a BMP (uncompressed). Indeed, I took that and up-scaled it to 15MP in IrfanView, then saved it as 80% jpeg, and it's half the file size and better quality than what LWSs "Max" setting provided. IrfanView took the 45 meg BMP down to a 1 meg JPG (at 80% Q) and I can't see any difference in details.Now for the little complaints: None for the camera, but the LWS software could use some 4:3 resolutions and finer-grained controls, like setting the bit-rate of the audio and tweaking some AVC profile settings, more video containers like AVI and MOV, and an uncompressed (BMP) option for snapshots.RightLight: Doesn't seem to do anything. Either the Exposure and Gain are in Auto or not, and you have to uncheck RightLight to uncheck Auto. In auto, the exposure slider usually stays at 9 (of 14) clicks, and the gain varies. Fast motion is nice and smooth, though blurry. With ample lighting, you can improve the video a little by going to manual and putting the exposur
Скроменый эксперт
24.02.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Length:: 4:41 MinsPlease disregard my "Spanglish" accent in the video review.I have to admit I was delighted to hear that Logitech had come out with a newer version of C910. I could not wait to try it and post a review. I knew this review would not compare to the video review I did for the C910 since there was no way my dogs were going to come in on "my" own terms. If you have no clue what I am talking about you need to see the video for yourself at this link: Logitech HD Pro Webcam C910 (I had dark brown hair back then). When I did the video review for the C910 I just talked about the picture, lighting and sound quality. Pretty much all of that stayed the same with a few minor enhancements. So this time around I wanted to show the some of the fun "extras" the webcam comes with like avatars, fun fillers and video mask effects.I understand that with time you need to upgrade and make improvements, but I wanted to understand and "dissect" the changes Logitech made with the C920. First thing I noticed was that the C920 is quite smaller in size. I posted several pictures on the product page so you can see the size difference. I wondered if the size variation would interfere with the dimension of the image that is captured or the quality of the sound because housing around the lens and speakers is smaller and more condensed. To my surprise, the picture and sound looked and sounded great. I was pleased it has a 6-foot long cable - great for a desktop computer, not so great for laptops. The cord is actually a foot longer than the C910. The camera sits perfectly on my 23-inch screen. The C920 has a "new" tab located underneath the front of the webcam. This allows the camera to sit more securely in place without worrying it will fall backwards or slide forwards Another great feature the C910 did not have is that it is tripod mountable.The C920 has 15 MP compared to 10MP on the C910. Let's talk about mega pixels a little bit. The resolution of a picture/image is represented by its mega pixels aka MP. The higher MP the larger you are able to view or print an image. Typically an 8MP resolution allows you to make an 8x11 photo quality print. If you try to make it large, your image quality will start to get worse and become blurry. In general smaller MP are great for Internet postings because most of the time you crop and edit pictures to make them even smaller. So how important is that the C920 is 15MP compared to 10MP? I guess it depends on what you are using it for. If you need to post or print a 15x20 or larger picture than 15MP will be great for you. This is not important to me since I do not use the webcam to print out or post HUGE pictures. The only pictures I might post using the webcam are silly looking "duck face" pictures on social sites. If I need to take photos, I will just use my digital camera. This webcam is primarily used to video chat with friends and my family.Please be aware in order to get 15MP quality pictures you must use the enhanced software Photo Capture which is included in the download - just like it is with the C910.Now lets talk about Full HD 1080p with H.264. I have heard of 1080p but what is H.264? I did some research. There are three different types of high definition modes: 720p, 1080i and 1080p. The 1080p is the only full HD. It is able to display a native resolution of a least 1080 lines, the higher the number of lines the sharper the image. The "p" means that the screen display images very quickly by completely refreshing the screen with every frame. This allows quick movements to display in sharp detail. Now let me explain H.264. The H.264 is best known as being the codec standards for Blu-ray discs. It is widely used by video streaming sources such as YouTube, Vivmeo, iTunes, Amazon and web software such as Adobe Flash Player and Apple QuickTime. So what does this all mean - it allows you to be viewed in 1080p in a clearer, faster, smoother and high definition (as long as the "viewer" has good quality equipment as well). The C920 does video processing in the webcam as opposed to the C910 using the computer's central processing unit. This means less lagging and hesitation on your system since everything is going on in the webcam - that makes a very big difference in framerates in HD quality.Installation was simple. I am using it in a Windows 7 Home Edition 64-bit OS environment. This webcam does NOT come with an installation CD. You must go to Logitech's website and download the software. The web address can be found in the instructional booklet. It only took less than 1 minute to download the file and about 2 minutes to install the software. The webcam was up and running in less than 3 minutes!The image is clear and the movement and response time is fast and smooth. Sound is heard loud and clear. It comes with all the extras the C910 comes with such as motion detection, follow me, face recognition, avatar, video mask features, RightLig
Скроменый эксперт
29.03.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Just pulled this out of the box (thanks UPS!), plugged it in and going through the setup process. No attempt at video-skype yet, but since the pictures/video seem to be good so far, I'm guessing that it will perform well with that as well.Pros:1) H.264 compression!! It's about time that Logitech got around to putting out a camera that had this. When shopping for a webcam for my wife early last fall, we ended up getting her the FaceVsion N1 (which has onboard H.264 compression). The C310 that we picked up would crash her computer (C2D U9600, 1.6ghz) when using it with Skype (Skype would try to switch to 720p, and the processor wouldn't be able to handle it. So I got the C310, and the N1 has worked perfectly on hers, using a fraction of the computing power of the C310. (My cat puked on the C310, so that's why I'm reviewing my brand-new C920.) We've yet to try either the N1 or the C920 on anything weaker than her C2D processor, but it might work with older/slower computers that can't run the non-compressed HD signals.2) Solid construction, non-slip surfaces for mounting on a computer monitor or shelf.3) Tripod mount, for those times when you are going to be recording video that's *not* pointed straight away from your laptop.4) Extra-long, 6' USB cable, so you can mount it wherever you need to.Cons (including features that aren't really worth paying for):1) USB cable is not detachable. I need ~18" to get from the top of my laptop to the nearest USB port, and so I have the remaining 4.5' wrapped in a loop, cluttering my desk. A detachable (standard) USB cable would have been best, since everyone has a ton of them in various lengths (from different pieces of electronics). It also makes the whole webcam rather heavy (comparatively), which would become noticeable if you're traveling for work and carrying it in your bag. The non-detachable aspect also makes dropping it into a small protective bag a bit more difficult.2) Doesn't fold flat. At all. The smallest this can be is a reasonably large "L" shape...3) Something about the combination of this webcam and the paint scheme in my room is throwing the white balance WAY off. It seems to be using the entire shot to determine the auto white balance, and the wide-angle lens picks up far more of the yellow walls / wood background. None of the other cameras I've used have had an issue in this room, but that could be that they weren't as wide-angle as this. If they could shrink the area that's used to determine white balance (like on most digital cameras/DSLRs), it would be VASTLY improved. Maybe they could combine it with face-tracking so it always ensured that your face was properly adjusted for?4) The "auto focus" seems to be relatively worthless, unless you're trying to show something in the ~3" range (possibly for work?). Anything more than ~18" away from the camera (ie, normal laptop range) is "infinity", so there's no more focusing needed due to the small aperture. With less wide-angle webcams this feature is definitely more important, but here it just seems like unless you're REALLY close.I'll add an update after I use it for a while, including for video Skype / Google Hangouts (it's main use). It seems like it's a great combination of things (Logitech's sharpening and color software are excellent, and it has the onboard H.264 that I loved from the N1), but it seems let down by a few notable problems (won't fold flat, non-detachable cord, questionable auto white balance) that keep it from getting 5 stars. Overall I think that it's a very, very good product, and considering how far technology has come in the past few years it's an excellent value. Now just fix those damn issues!edit: Update after using it for Skype, it's definitely a pretty neat little webcam. The H.264 was interesting, as watching the call tech data I'd watch it go from using ~65% CPU usage while streaming at 640x480 down to ~25% (occasionally in the teens) after it bumped up to 720p. Apparently it only does onboard compression at the 720p level and up, and not below it. Was funny watching video quality go up at the same time as CPU usage plummet. At the 720p level of CPU usage, I'd imagine that it would work with a (reasonably) slow computer, although who knows if it would actually work or not. My computer: Intel C2D P8700 2.53ghz, 4gb ram.Lastly, if anyone has the opportunity to try this with an ancient computer (like.... a 3.0ghz Pentium 4 or D), I'd love to know whether it would work. Trying to figure out if this would work with my parents or my sister's computer, and it'd be great to know whether it works or not before going through the hassle.
Показаны отзывы 601-624 из 1092.
