Отзывы о Видеокамера JVC GY-HM180E
Где купить Видеокамера JVC GY-HM180E
 | JVC Видеокамера JVC GY-HM180E | Яндекс Маркет | 315 000 ₽ | Посмотреть |
198 отзывов пользователей o JVC GY-HM180E
Пользовались
JVC GY-HM180E?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Сириус-3ZTKO
06.03.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Дешевые аксессуары,если сравнивать с Sony.Очень быстро стартует. очень мощный оптический zoom (20х), легкая, при хорошем освещении картинка хорошая на твердую 4.Хорошая камера за сущие копейки - 12000 руб!!!
- - Плохой стабилизатор,естественность цветов нарушена в сторону фиолетового, плохая чувствительность...
НаноПилигрим-6BUCQ
22.01.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Full HD за относительно скромные деньги. Легкая, компактная, практически полное отсутствие движущихся частей.
- - Отсутствие сенсорного дисплея. Я думал, что уже не бывает ни камер ни фотиков, ни телефонов без сенсорного дисплея...был удивлен. Но 10 минут упорно тыкал пальцем в кнопки на дисплее.
Полная стоимость!!! Она намного дороже чем ее продают.
Да нормально она снимает. По большому счету и фото прокатит. Камера нужна для чего? Правильно...вот это великая китайская стена, вот это мы в ницце, это казино в монте-карло, это мы в отеле в Шарме...никто кроме вас ЭТО смотреть не будет. Как дети растут снимает, думаю около процента людей. Остальным камера нужня для съемок турпоездок. Тут она просто супер как подходит - компактная, легкая, вешается на шею, если надо, можно всегда скинут видео с SD в ноут.
А теперь прокомментирую на счет полной стоимости. Тут все просто - надо внимательно читать документацию. А там написано - поток на XP 17 мбит/сек. Это минимум, что нужно(вообще ей нужно 24 мбит/сек). А еще запутка в доке - написано SD карта калса не ниже 6. Ну-ну. Только...
А теперь прокомментирую на счет полной стоимости. Тут все просто - надо внимательно читать документацию. А там написано - поток на XP 17 мбит/сек. Это минимум, что нужно(вообще ей нужно 24 мбит/сек). А еще запутка в доке - написано SD карта калса не ниже 6. Ну-ну. Только...
НоваГость-2OSTP
28.02.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Можно брать, соотношение деньги-качество
- + Пользую месяц, по своим деньгам очень достойная камера, цветопередача отличная, простая в работе, всё доступно и просто, с конкурентами- на уровне, ( у кума самсунг 200).При съёмке в помещении картинка немного шумит, ( как у всех) надо правильно выбирать баланс белого, на ТВ HD воспроизводит очень и очень достойно, видит флеху на 64 гиг.
- - Нет своей флехи, и шнурка к крышке объектива, можно потерять.
НаноПилигрим-2WUKJ
31.08.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Неплохое соотношение цена/качество. Приятная картинка, особенно на природе, но и в помещении шумы не слишком велики, а цвет остается. Наличие некоторых ручных режимов и ручного автофокуса.
- - Цифровой стабилизатор уступает оптическому у камер конкурентов этой, или даже более дешевой цены. Автофокус работает не лучшим образом, особенно в помещении (часто перефокусируется) при этом любая работа автофокуса сопровождается легким скрежетом, который записывается вместе с видео и слышен при воспроизведении. При ручной фокусировке ничего не поскрипывает...
Аргонавт-5BXIL
24.06.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Отличная сборка, в мою руку камера легла, наличие отдельных кнопок для выбора выдержки и диафрагмы, удобное управление ручным фокусом. Отличная съемка при плохом освещении. Качественный звук, фирменная технология К2.
- - Маленький экран, у конкурентов намного больше и лучше по разрешению и размеру, плюс сенсор. "Узкий" объектив, для съемок в помещении будет желание отойти подальше.
Снял несколько тестовых роликов.
Все ролики кроме одного сняты с отключенным оптическим стабилизатором, так как штатива под рукой не было, то все снимал с рук.
Первый ролик, много мелких объектов:
http://narod.ru/disk/22179781000/00036.MTS.html
10-и кратный зум, стабилизатор отключен, снимаю с рук:
http://narod...
Все ролики кроме одного сняты с отключенным оптическим стабилизатором, так как штатива под рукой не было, то все снимал с рук.
Первый ролик, много мелких объектов:
http://narod.ru/disk/22179781000/00036.MTS.html
10-и кратный зум, стабилизатор отключен, снимаю с рук:
http://narod...
Гелиос-0UGSW
14.02.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + достойное качество видео, фотки 1 0на 15 как на цифровой мыльнице, поэтому получается 2 в 1(камера и фотик)
в помещениии на редкость хорошее качество без зернистости и без скажения света...2 слота было неожиданно увидеть...
Плазмонавт-3NRKP
08.05.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Малый размер, пишет на сменные карты памяти
- - Отвратительное качество записи видео при недостаточном освещении. Недостаточное освещение начинается при трех открытых горящих лампочках по 100вт в люстре в комнате 15кв.м. Заявленные три мегапикселя в матрице нигде себя не проявляют. В фоторежиме максимальное разрешение снимка 1920x1080, что соответствует матрице в 2 мегапикселя. Качество снимков неважное. Так, что фоторежим вообще не пригодится. На моем телефоне sony ericsson K790 стоит тоже матрица 3 Мегапикселя и снимки идут с разрешением 2048x1536. Ну и фотки более достойные получаются.
Память купил 10 класса. По хорошему здесь нужна оперативка ещё более высокого класса, чтобы обеспечить более высокий битрейт. Но в продаже не нашел...
Туманник-0TTLZ
23.05.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Качество картинки на уровне фильмов Blue-Ray 1920х1080 (то, что режим съёмки 1080i узнал только из описания). Телевизор -- плазма 42 дюйма.
1. Действительно высокая чувствительность матрицы (снимал вечером с максимальным увеличением -- адекватная картинка с различаемыми деталями)
2. Очень быстрая фокусировка (снимал салют на 9 мая с балкона -- на резкость с неба на фейерверк наводилась очень быстро)
3. Оптический зум большой
4. Оптическую стабилизацию (как раз и приводящую к замыливанию или дёрганию изображения при движении) можно включить в 2-х режимах или отключить вовсе.
5. При длительной съёмке с рук оптическая...
Квантум-0ZFXS
24.10.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Это моя 3 камера уже.Маленькая по размеру.В руке удобно сидит.Купил карту памяти на 16 гб.Места для съемки теперь полно.Со штатива в помещении качество отличное...
НоваГость-0UCLS
18.10.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
Недавно приобрели данную модель! Очень довольны! Качество видео порадовало, удобный интерфейс! Удачное сочетание цены и качества. Единственный минус, который замечен, но не считаю его весомым: съёмная крышечка на объективе, да ещё и без ремешка.
ТехноНаблюдатель-8XUGM
02.09.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Цена, дизайн, компактность, вес
- - Маленький объем встроенной памяти
Пользовался пока немного. В самом шикарном разрешении объема встроенной памяти хватит на 40 минут записи...
Дроид-5JMON
06.06.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Суперкомпакт! "СВОЯ" память 8Гб. Качество съемки на улице- отлично! То что она на флешке, а не на харде, двойной плюс!(батарею жрет не так быстро)
- - При недостаточном освещении шумит, качество фотографий- отстой(дома, на улице...
Астрономад-7XHZK
05.08.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Снимает на SD карты до 32 Гигов или внутреннюю флеш память 64гига. Достаточно широкий объектив, чтоб...
Спектр-2JHVV
24.04.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + понравился дизайн, соотношение цена-технич. показатели.. Короче прикупил я ее ..., а через пару дней вернул в магаз обратно.
- - очень огорчила картинка при просмотре на компьютере - много шума при плохом, но все-таки освещении, границы предметов при повороте...
Астрономад-8RCWS
19.04.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Хороший звук и картинка, малошумная в условиях плохой овещенности
- - отсутстие подсветки
у кого есть - берегите,...
МехаРейнджер-9HAIF
01.07.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Очень маленький размер. Легкая, вопрос взять или не взять с собой не возникнет. Это моя первая HD камера, в сравнении с предыдущим Canon Mvx качество на порядок выше, картинка очень хорошего качества. Читал о большом количестве проблем с перегоном информации на комп с последующим редактированием, обработал файл скопированный с камеры в Sony Vegas 9.0, с последующим конвертированием в более широко используемые форматы, достаточно быстро и без глюков. Очень быстро готова к работе, буквально 1-2 секунды и можно снимать.
- - Недостаточно емкий аккумулятор,...
ИнфраГость-7MUAM
10.07.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Вприципе не плохой аппарат, для съемки семейного видео. Быстрый запуск с режима ожидания. На мой взгляд достаточно памяти (14ч. при самом высоком качестве). Неплохой зумер 32х на оптике.
- - Недостатки я бы отметил: плохой стабилизатор; малое продолжительнось аккумулятора(90м...
ХроноГость-3TZKZ
01.08.2009
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Большой размер матрицы.
- - При плохом освещении лучше не снимать
Я видеокамерами пользуюсь редко. НО. Купил эту модель. Поснимал на улице - КЛАСС! Пришёл домой - поснимал - посмотрел и продал эту...
Кронос-2WFIL
17.03.2009
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Вчера купил. Пришел домой, и поснимал в комнате при искусств. освещении. Подсоеденил к ЖК телику 52" - качество никакое, всё размыто, ужас, как-будто гуашью рисовали (качество...
Зета-Орион-1UWXH
16.06.2008
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Светосила
Оснащённость
Компактность..... - - Только один - малое время работы от стандартного аккумулятора...
Гиперион-3EWYW
30.08.2019
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Посредсвенная модель
- + Удобное крепление, маленький размер, водонепроницаемость. Своих денег стоит.
- - Качество съемки могло быть лучше. Маленькая батарея. На фулл хд батарея садится примерно за час. На 40 км/ч сильно шумит микрофон (даже заклеивал...
Квазар-3HHXE
09.01.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
This review is for the JVC Models GZ-E10, GZ-HM35, GZ-HM40 and its variations.
Given the heritage of JVC products, my expectations were relatively high. Though I'm sure the unit is mechanically and electronically sound, I found the ergonomics to be disastrous. From other reviews I understood that the unit was small and not for those with larger hands. I felt I was safe because my hands are small.
However, this unit was small even for my hands - perhaps a good candidate for children. Here are the ergonomic weaknesses I found:
1. No matter how I positioned the strap, I could not seem to get a comfortable and useful grip on the device.
2. With the battery projecting from the back of the unit, it was nearly impossible for my thumb to reach the record button. I imagine it would even be worse with the extended-life (and depth) of the larger batteries. I suppose one could use the index finger of the right hand.
3. The Play, Up/Left, Down/Right, OK/Info, and Menu buttons run down the inside rear of the camcorder and are impossible to press with one's thumb. I found I have to use my index finger (or fingernail) from my other hand to press these tiny buttons. Though it would probably be too much to expect for the cost of this unit, it could have benefited from a pushbutton wheel with center OK as is popular with many digital cameras. Backlighting would also be helpful to identify the buttons, so don't expect to press any controls at Becky's recital without a flashlight.
4. The index finger is supposed to rest on the Wide/Tele lever. But just behind the lever is a rarely used button toggling between Auto and Manual modes. I don't know why this option couldn't have been selectable from a menu. I found I needed to use my middle finger to adjust the W/T lever so as not to accidentally switch to manual mode.
5. Speaking of menus, some functions are several levels deep. For example, one has to press buttons no less than five times to get to the focus function in manual mode (from auto mode.) And then the rough focus, (pressing and holding the tiny up/down buttons, and not using the lever as one would expect,) swept too large a range, and the fine focus performed by single presses of the buttons took an eternity to reach total manual focus. It helped to zoom in to the subject area for manual focus, and then zoom back for composition.
There was also a nuisance I should have taken heed from another user. This would have been a deal breaker if I knew what I know now. The resultant files this camcorder produces is not in a typical video format such as AVI, WMV, MOV, FLV, MPG, MPEG, or MP4. Instead, it formats video as MTS files (mpeg transport stream, supporting HD video reproduction.) This is fine if you want to watch videos directly from the camcorder or while connected to a TV or other video device. Trouble is, if you want to download the files and watch them on your computer, you have to locate and download an MTS viewer to watch them. Worse, if you want to convert the files to another format for editing and other purposes, you have to locate and download a converter. The converters I've found take about ten minutes to convert a four minute file. It doesn't take a math genius to calculate the conversion time for a half hour video.
About the only redeeming quality I found on this camcorder is its amazing 40x optical zoom. All said, if one can get around the ergonomic nightmares, this could be a good value as an entry level camcorder for the kids, grandkids, or adults with VERY small hands.
Given the heritage of JVC products, my expectations were relatively high. Though I'm sure the unit is mechanically and electronically sound, I found the ergonomics to be disastrous. From other reviews I understood that the unit was small and not for those with larger hands. I felt I was safe because my hands are small.
However, this unit was small even for my hands - perhaps a good candidate for children. Here are the ergonomic weaknesses I found:
1. No matter how I positioned the strap, I could not seem to get a comfortable and useful grip on the device.
2. With the battery projecting from the back of the unit, it was nearly impossible for my thumb to reach the record button. I imagine it would even be worse with the extended-life (and depth) of the larger batteries. I suppose one could use the index finger of the right hand.
3. The Play, Up/Left, Down/Right, OK/Info, and Menu buttons run down the inside rear of the camcorder and are impossible to press with one's thumb. I found I have to use my index finger (or fingernail) from my other hand to press these tiny buttons. Though it would probably be too much to expect for the cost of this unit, it could have benefited from a pushbutton wheel with center OK as is popular with many digital cameras. Backlighting would also be helpful to identify the buttons, so don't expect to press any controls at Becky's recital without a flashlight.
4. The index finger is supposed to rest on the Wide/Tele lever. But just behind the lever is a rarely used button toggling between Auto and Manual modes. I don't know why this option couldn't have been selectable from a menu. I found I needed to use my middle finger to adjust the W/T lever so as not to accidentally switch to manual mode.
5. Speaking of menus, some functions are several levels deep. For example, one has to press buttons no less than five times to get to the focus function in manual mode (from auto mode.) And then the rough focus, (pressing and holding the tiny up/down buttons, and not using the lever as one would expect,) swept too large a range, and the fine focus performed by single presses of the buttons took an eternity to reach total manual focus. It helped to zoom in to the subject area for manual focus, and then zoom back for composition.
There was also a nuisance I should have taken heed from another user. This would have been a deal breaker if I knew what I know now. The resultant files this camcorder produces is not in a typical video format such as AVI, WMV, MOV, FLV, MPG, MPEG, or MP4. Instead, it formats video as MTS files (mpeg transport stream, supporting HD video reproduction.) This is fine if you want to watch videos directly from the camcorder or while connected to a TV or other video device. Trouble is, if you want to download the files and watch them on your computer, you have to locate and download an MTS viewer to watch them. Worse, if you want to convert the files to another format for editing and other purposes, you have to locate and download a converter. The converters I've found take about ten minutes to convert a four minute file. It doesn't take a math genius to calculate the conversion time for a half hour video.
About the only redeeming quality I found on this camcorder is its amazing 40x optical zoom. All said, if one can get around the ergonomic nightmares, this could be a good value as an entry level camcorder for the kids, grandkids, or adults with VERY small hands.
ТехноНаблюдатель-6RTTP
09.01.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
This review is for the JVC Models GZ-E10, GZ-HM35, GZ-HM40 and its variations.
Given the heritage of JVC products, my expectations were relatively high. Though I'm sure the unit is mechanically and electronically sound, I found the ergonomics to be disastrous. From other reviews I understood that the unit was small and not for those with larger hands. I felt I was safe because my hands are small.
However, this unit was small even for my hands - perhaps a good candidate for children. Here are the ergonomic weaknesses I found:
1. No matter how I positioned the strap, I could not seem to get a comfortable and useful grip on the device.
2. With the battery projecting from the back of the unit, it was nearly impossible for my thumb to reach the record button. I imagine it would even be worse with the extended-life (and depth) of the larger batteries. I suppose one could use the index finger of the right hand.
3. The Play, Up/Left, Down/Right, OK/Info, and Menu buttons run down the inside rear of the camcorder and are impossible to press with one's thumb. I found I have to use my index finger (or fingernail) from my other hand to press these tiny buttons. Though it would probably be too much to expect for the cost of this unit, it could have benefited from a pushbutton wheel with center OK as is popular with many digital cameras. Backlighting would also be helpful to identify the buttons, so don't expect to press any controls at Becky's recital without a flashlight.
4. The index finger is supposed to rest on the Wide/Tele lever. But just behind the lever is a rarely used button toggling between Auto and Manual modes. I don't know why this option couldn't have been selectable from a menu. I found I needed to use my middle finger to adjust the W/T lever so as not to accidentally switch to manual mode.
5. Speaking of menus, some functions are several levels deep. For example, one has to press buttons no less than five times to get to the focus function in manual mode (from auto mode.) And then the rough focus, (pressing and holding the tiny up/down buttons, and not using the lever as one would expect,) swept too large a range, and the fine focus performed by single presses of the buttons took an eternity to reach total manual focus. It helped to zoom in to the subject area for manual focus, and then zoom back for composition.
There was also a nuisance I should have taken heed from another user. This would have been a deal breaker if I knew what I know now. The resultant files this camcorder produces is not in a typical video format such as AVI, WMV, MOV, FLV, MPG, MPEG, or MP4. Instead, it formats video as MTS files (mpeg transport stream, supporting HD video reproduction.) This is fine if you want to watch videos directly from the camcorder or while connected to a TV or other video device. Trouble is, if you want to download the files and watch them on your computer, you have to locate and download an MTS viewer to watch them. Worse, if you want to convert the files to another format for editing and other purposes, you have to locate and download a converter. The converters I've found take about ten minutes to convert a four minute file. It doesn't take a math genius to calculate the conversion time for a half hour video.
About the only redeeming quality I found on this camcorder is its amazing 40x optical zoom. All said, if one can get around the ergonomic nightmares, this could be a good value as an entry level camcorder for the kids, grandkids, or adults with VERY small hands.
Given the heritage of JVC products, my expectations were relatively high. Though I'm sure the unit is mechanically and electronically sound, I found the ergonomics to be disastrous. From other reviews I understood that the unit was small and not for those with larger hands. I felt I was safe because my hands are small.
However, this unit was small even for my hands - perhaps a good candidate for children. Here are the ergonomic weaknesses I found:
1. No matter how I positioned the strap, I could not seem to get a comfortable and useful grip on the device.
2. With the battery projecting from the back of the unit, it was nearly impossible for my thumb to reach the record button. I imagine it would even be worse with the extended-life (and depth) of the larger batteries. I suppose one could use the index finger of the right hand.
3. The Play, Up/Left, Down/Right, OK/Info, and Menu buttons run down the inside rear of the camcorder and are impossible to press with one's thumb. I found I have to use my index finger (or fingernail) from my other hand to press these tiny buttons. Though it would probably be too much to expect for the cost of this unit, it could have benefited from a pushbutton wheel with center OK as is popular with many digital cameras. Backlighting would also be helpful to identify the buttons, so don't expect to press any controls at Becky's recital without a flashlight.
4. The index finger is supposed to rest on the Wide/Tele lever. But just behind the lever is a rarely used button toggling between Auto and Manual modes. I don't know why this option couldn't have been selectable from a menu. I found I needed to use my middle finger to adjust the W/T lever so as not to accidentally switch to manual mode.
5. Speaking of menus, some functions are several levels deep. For example, one has to press buttons no less than five times to get to the focus function in manual mode (from auto mode.) And then the rough focus, (pressing and holding the tiny up/down buttons, and not using the lever as one would expect,) swept too large a range, and the fine focus performed by single presses of the buttons took an eternity to reach total manual focus. It helped to zoom in to the subject area for manual focus, and then zoom back for composition.
There was also a nuisance I should have taken heed from another user. This would have been a deal breaker if I knew what I know now. The resultant files this camcorder produces is not in a typical video format such as AVI, WMV, MOV, FLV, MPG, MPEG, or MP4. Instead, it formats video as MTS files (mpeg transport stream, supporting HD video reproduction.) This is fine if you want to watch videos directly from the camcorder or while connected to a TV or other video device. Trouble is, if you want to download the files and watch them on your computer, you have to locate and download an MTS viewer to watch them. Worse, if you want to convert the files to another format for editing and other purposes, you have to locate and download a converter. The converters I've found take about ten minutes to convert a four minute file. It doesn't take a math genius to calculate the conversion time for a half hour video.
About the only redeeming quality I found on this camcorder is its amazing 40x optical zoom. All said, if one can get around the ergonomic nightmares, this could be a good value as an entry level camcorder for the kids, grandkids, or adults with VERY small hands.
ТехноНаблюдатель-2INMD
31.05.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
First, Im not comparing this to a $500 or even more expensive camera, it's not fair. It's like complaining my chevy aveo is slower than my friends camaro.
For the price you won't get external audio inputs or a wide range of manual camera features and recording options on most any camera. This camera only records at 1080x19020I or 720x480I, your only options are video bitrate. It is misleading on JVC's part to say it records at 1080x1920 since it only has a 1.5MP sensor, with that sensor it can only capture around 1440x900, the image is then resized and recorded to full HD. A typical SD camera will have around 0.3MP sensor, a true full HD sensor will have 2.1MP or more. This camera could have recorded true 1280x720 but oddly it does not have that option.
The bit rate ranges from around 24,000 (175MB / Minute) to 3000 (22MB / Minute). Unlike some off brand low cost HD cameras, this JVC is quick to focus and maintains focus while zooming. The zoom is variable speed, although the zoom button/slider is almost to small to control accurately. Overall, the video is ok to good quality, meets expectations for the price.
Since it records avchd, the video files are buried in the directories. Once you find them Windows media player and VLC player both play the raw .mts files from off the SD card in a card reader with no extra software. You can also upload the video files directly to youtube with no conversion. I dont see why some people are going though so many extra steps of using software to transfer and convert the videos just to watch them on their computer. Sony Vegas Pro will read/edit these files with no problem. I have not tried other programs, make sure they support avchd so you dont have to waste time and quality converting them. Since it's HD, you will need to bring the quality down to if you want to make a standard DVD, video conversion does take a good computer, if yours is only a single or dual core cpu, expect to walk away and come back later when it's done. If your serious about quickly editing the video, adding effects and converting them to other formats you should have a 4 core or better cpu. Mine is 6 core, 8GB ram with 4TB (4000 GB) hard drive space. A good video card will also unload the work from your cpu, given both your gpu and video editing software both support this feature.
One drawback on all jvc cameras are their smart batteries, they are not available as direct drop in's from the aftermarket sellers and very expensive. I bought a battery for a Panasonic for around $22, the same capacity sold by JVC would sell for around $69. You can get a kind of universal aftermarket battery, that fools the camera into thinking it's plugged into an ac power adapter, it may work but the battery life will not be displayed on screen. The battery that comes with this camera is only good for 45 minutes to 1 hour, but again this is the low end model. The more expensive models come with a larger battery.
In the end, if you need something near HD quality, light, low cost and something that will probably last, this will do the job.
For the price you won't get external audio inputs or a wide range of manual camera features and recording options on most any camera. This camera only records at 1080x19020I or 720x480I, your only options are video bitrate. It is misleading on JVC's part to say it records at 1080x1920 since it only has a 1.5MP sensor, with that sensor it can only capture around 1440x900, the image is then resized and recorded to full HD. A typical SD camera will have around 0.3MP sensor, a true full HD sensor will have 2.1MP or more. This camera could have recorded true 1280x720 but oddly it does not have that option.
The bit rate ranges from around 24,000 (175MB / Minute) to 3000 (22MB / Minute). Unlike some off brand low cost HD cameras, this JVC is quick to focus and maintains focus while zooming. The zoom is variable speed, although the zoom button/slider is almost to small to control accurately. Overall, the video is ok to good quality, meets expectations for the price.
Since it records avchd, the video files are buried in the directories. Once you find them Windows media player and VLC player both play the raw .mts files from off the SD card in a card reader with no extra software. You can also upload the video files directly to youtube with no conversion. I dont see why some people are going though so many extra steps of using software to transfer and convert the videos just to watch them on their computer. Sony Vegas Pro will read/edit these files with no problem. I have not tried other programs, make sure they support avchd so you dont have to waste time and quality converting them. Since it's HD, you will need to bring the quality down to if you want to make a standard DVD, video conversion does take a good computer, if yours is only a single or dual core cpu, expect to walk away and come back later when it's done. If your serious about quickly editing the video, adding effects and converting them to other formats you should have a 4 core or better cpu. Mine is 6 core, 8GB ram with 4TB (4000 GB) hard drive space. A good video card will also unload the work from your cpu, given both your gpu and video editing software both support this feature.
One drawback on all jvc cameras are their smart batteries, they are not available as direct drop in's from the aftermarket sellers and very expensive. I bought a battery for a Panasonic for around $22, the same capacity sold by JVC would sell for around $69. You can get a kind of universal aftermarket battery, that fools the camera into thinking it's plugged into an ac power adapter, it may work but the battery life will not be displayed on screen. The battery that comes with this camera is only good for 45 minutes to 1 hour, but again this is the low end model. The more expensive models come with a larger battery.
In the end, if you need something near HD quality, light, low cost and something that will probably last, this will do the job.
Показаны отзывы 145-168 из 198.
