Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Fujifilm Instax Mini 12
3936 отзывов пользователей o Fujifilm Instax Mini 12
Пользовались
Fujifilm Instax Mini 12?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
The best in sound videos .and voice messages....went out a few days ago and my camera fell and the zoom was not working ..my world turn upsidedown .. so i quickly went online and hoping to find that same one... one week after I purchased the same exact camera from amazon and was so thrill to have it all set up again....thanx to fuji and amazon
I will recommend this camera to any and any one which is why im having it twice in a Row
For many things it's great. The optical zoom is something that you would have to pay through the nose for in lenses in an SLR. It's versatile and has lots of the features and customisability of an SLR. Infact it behaves just like one.
Good points:
1.You can shoot in RAW (although this is buried in the menu),
2.Allows for shot bracketing for HDR,
3.Varying levels of control offered for aperture, shutter speed, ISO, focus, white balance to suit any possible level of interest and to be useful in most situations - As good as an SLR on this.
4.Live display on LCD which is clear and large
5.Anti shake technology useful for High Zoom
6.Hot shoe for external flash
7.The macro and super macro setting are pretty good.
8.It's pretty cheap.
9.The Tilting screen is super useful! For taking shots in crowds/on the floor it is essential.
and all the obvious ones they tell you on the website. If you were to upgrade an SLR from the kit lenses it comes with in order to do the same you would find your wallet considerably lighter. All in all a great camera. So why not buy?
Bad points:
1.The manual focus sucks! The focus once button redeems this slightly but this is a pain.
2.I don't like the digital viewfinder being digital I'd rather an optical one but that's just me. It is useful in very sunny conditions.
3.The sensor is significantly smaller than an entry level SLR and you do notice it although it is better than any other non SLR camera I've tried.
4.The smallest aperture I can get to on min Zoom is F8.... This is really annoying and frankly rubbish compared to F22 of the entry level SLR. This means that without buying neutral density filters It is impossible to take long exposure pictures in all but the worst of light. This camera is not good for long exposures or photos where a large Depth of Field is required for this reason.
However, I'm very glad I own one. The Pros definitely outweigh the cons. These are really the only 4 cons I have. I could have listed Pros all day I just stuck to the ones that aren't mentioned much.
Hope that helps
Takes pictures anywhere under most conditions very easily.
All options are within finger reach and can be changed very quickly.
Tip- read the manual and keep it with you while you get use to the options.
So it came as a surprize when I downloaded my first images from the 2000HD that they all appeared blurred - and those taken using the integral flash were all overexposed.
I tried the camera on many of the other settings and eventhough the images were better, they were still blurred and no way matched my old camera, despite offering a 10MP resolution.
Having finally tried and failed to produce some quality images, I felt that perhaps there was a problem with the lens - and have therefore returned the camera to Amazon.
It may well be that the camera that I received was faulty - and is not a true reflection of the model, but paying £160 I did expect similar or better results to my previous Fuji.
That said, the camera is laden with many useful features including the zoom bracketing (which takes three shots of the same image at different zoom settings simultaneously).
Having been a real fan of fuji cameras, I now feel dissapointed and will probably be looking at another brand in future.
However, since the obvious comparison is between the s5 and D200, the s5 is clearly superior to the D200 on image quality, particularly right out of the camera. In speed of operation however, the D200 leaves the s5 in the proverbial dust.
The Nikon D200 is sure and fast, very fast. Like all the latest digital Nikon's, they will keep shooting for extended periods. However, the images demand you tweak the camera and do copious amounts of post-processing. The Fuji is more deliberate. It is fast enough to get out of its own way and get the shot and as well as the next, but not fast enough to keep shooting under demanding conditions, at which the Nikon excels. It isnt that the s5 is sluggish, it is that the Nikon is just so fast.
However, once you understand the reason for this relative slowness, you can deal with it. Again, it's all about the images.
The Fuji will produce stunning images from RAW files. It will do beautiful images straight from the camera. If you are a JPEG shooter and hate processing images on the computer, this is the camera for you.
Although the metering is very, very accurate under all but the most backlit conditions, it has a tendency to underexpose the images in anything less than sunlight, so exposure compensation is a must. The good news there, is that unlike most other cameras Ive used, where exposure compensation can be hit or miss - or thoroughly ineffective, compensation is even and responsive. This keeps me from having to fiddle with metering options trying to get the proper exposure. A seriously underrated feature of the camera.
Before the v1.06 firmware update, I was not impressed with the Automatic White Balance, having to constantly change the custom white balance, particularly with street lighting or ANY kind of flourescent lighting. Charged-gas lighting would give a nasty yellow or green cast to the images. After the update, the AWB is stunning, able to handle almost any lighting thrown at it. Since the update, I rarely touch the white balance settings. I simply dont have to. Amazing.
Also, before the update - the images would go "Blue" under strong light and deep shadows, with a deep magenta-ish cast at night. After the update, that tendency has been minimized and the images are far better balanced - giving that true Fuji color without overdoing it either way.
If you get a unit without the latest firmware, upgrade it at once. Period. This update gives me the camera I expected out of the box.
So, the good news: The images are worth every penny you pay.
The only way I can put it - standard, out of camera images often look like HDR images with unreal detail in both shadows and highlight. When you get that characteristic glossy look from a shot, you will involuntarily gasp.
More good news: For low light images, this camera is nothing short of amazing. I shoot primarily at night and in low light, and I rarely, almost never - shoot above ISO 1250. I have shot (using a f/2.8 17-55mm Nikkor) at ISO 2000 in near darkness, and the images came out as if I had studio lights with VERY little noise. And thats another thing, noise is near nonexistent on the vast majority of my images, and what there is has a nice even film-like grain, not blotchy or nasty as you would see on a D200 shooting above ISO 400.
However, all this goodness comes at a price. The high quality images are HUGE. A JPEG file set at the highest quality (FINE) takes up 5 - 7 megs. A RAW file averages 25 megs. This is why the camera doesnt feel as fast as the Nikon, as it is transferring massive amounts of data through the buffer to the card. You will start looking for large and very fast CF cards as well as upgrading your storage in short order.
The camera is expensive compared to the D200, but it is definitely worth the premium if you demand the highest quality images. To bring out the best in this camera, you need the highest quality lenses. It is also murder on sloppy camera technique, so be sure to avoid shake.
In all good conscience, I cannot rate the camera as 5 stars, but it is definitely a 4.5 - 4.75, even at the price.
If I had to choose between the D200 and S5, the S5 wins hands down. In fact, I would get a D2Xs as a speedy backup to this camera, not the D200. My wish would be if Fuji decided to put this sensor and technology into the body of a D2Xs. Then Id probably give it 5 stars.
-----------
(Edit)
So, after 5 months and 35,000 images later...
For image settings I dont fark around with the film simulation
I have had a great deal of fun with this, and have taken great shots in a variety of scenes. For the price this delivered exceptional value, with quality and flexibilty.
I would highly recommend to anyone who wishes to take the first step from a standard camera but does not want to invest as much time and money in the more expensive DSLRs out there.
The Movie feature is also excellent. I hadnt really paid much attention to it, but later discivered it produces HD quality movies with zoom features whilst filming. Better than my recently purchased camcorder.
Watch out for the accessories linked via amazon. I bought a camera case which was much too small!
Bottom line - It's a nice handy go-anywhere camera.
Like all of the modern stuff these days, it isn't straight forward to get used to at first and you can get your settings mixed up if you don't know what you are doing. This said however, there is a handy 'reset' setting that can get you out of trouble and return the camera to its original settings (ideal for 'point and clickers!') There are a few drawbacks with the camera but nothing major. For example, when taking pictures at 7 mega pixels, the camera takes a while to process your shots. This means that you are unable to shoot a succession of shots quickly. I also find that the 10X Zoom is occasionally insufficient but lets be fair here we are talking about a cheap camera! You will spend quite a bit of money on batteries if you take a lot of film but I reckon I get around 2-3 hours of footage for a set of Duracell batteries which isn't bad really.
Once you do get used to using this, you will be keen to get out and use it. Believe me, if a technophobic like me can learn to use this to ANY degree it must be user friendly! HA HA
No, I have taken thousands of pictures and hundreds of films with this and would not hesitate to buy another should anything happen to mine.
A real bargain.
I previously owned a FinePix S5700 which was a very good all rounder. For Christmas 2009 My wife bought me a Toshiba Camelio HD video camera (which i hinted for) but to put it mildly it was rubbish..rubbish rubbish.
My wife took it back got a refund.
My wife then bought me S2000HD via my amazon account (unfortunately the first one never turned up). All I can say is WOW
The picture quality is fantastic even in very low light and the HD video is better than anything i have seen on any HD video camera.
The camera is very easy to use and has some very good professional features, which would give some high end Nikons or Cannons a run for there money.Its also worth mentioning that the S2000HD which I got from Amazon has the Version 2 firmware, which is not even listed on the official Fuji website (The latest version on Fuji website is version 1.1)
The price on Amazon is exceptional good value for money as you dont just get the camera you get the full HD connection kit and remote control which is normally £35.00 to £50.00 alone.
My tip would be to buy a screen protector for the LCD screen.
This is not a indepth review, as you can see but if you are thinking about buying this camera "BUY IT NOW" you wont regret it.






