Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Fujifilm Instax Mini 12
3936 отзывов пользователей o Fujifilm Instax Mini 12
Пользовались
Fujifilm Instax Mini 12?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Many people seem to have problems with the battery life, my suggestion is to get Lithium batteries. They have lasted up to five concerts before I have needed to change them. That's pretty good seeing that I often take between 200-300 pictures a concert (and a couple of videos as well).
This camera is easy to use. Was able to do everything I needed to do without reading the manual. Plugged it in my computer (Mac) and iPhoto came up and did everything I needed it to do. Easy as pie! And I am not a technical person, by the way. :)
What amazed me was the great color my photos has. Really bright, really sharp. Made me look like a much better photographer than I am.
Good size. Not the smallest, but comfortable to carry around with you, in a pocket or purse. Display is large enough to tell what is going on, although it's good to have a bit of shade for easy reading.
The last couple of cameras I have purchased have been Nikon. After the great experience with this one, I am definitely getting a Fuji when this one goes out. I expect that to be a few years from now though because it has all the features I need, it's small, and it is well constructed.
The construction of the camera (build quality) is incredible at this price point. It's really built solid - and has the finish of a luxury product. I have it in the brown color and have gotten many compliments. The logo on the front also lights up at power up and when a photo is taken. It's a nice touch that adds just a little extra polish; you can disable it if you like (another nice touch!). I've used Sony's offerings in this class (W50, W80) and they feel cheap by comparison.
I bought this a couple months ago - it's not a super new camera at this point, but it's still very current - especially with the "lower" resolution - you avoid the noise and file sizes of those first generation cameras with the 10-12 megapixel CCDs. Plus you're not paying out the nose for that higher pixel count which really doesn't help the quality of your photos. There is a newer version of this model (Z10), but I'm not a big fan of where they're taking it design-wise.
I also have a Fuji F30. Obviously the image quality of that camera is better with its bounty of manual options - however the 'F' series isn't the greatest in terms of compactness. The F30 also bothered me - it takes a while to get a decent picture - even longer to get the ideal exposure, there's just a lot of fiddling to do to get the job done - something that's not always possible in every situation. The Z5 is the opposite, you might not get the highest quality possible, but you're going to get a great shot in the shortest amount of time in just about all the situations the F30 can handle.
Low light performance isn't on par with the F series, but it's head and shoulders above everything else in its class.
Face detection works pretty well - not every time, but it generally does a good job regardless of light level and is a welcome addition.
My only quibbles with this camera are that the lens cover can sometimes slide open in your pocket, it would have been preferable to make it slightly harder to open, but it's minor - only happened a couple times so far. I also wish that there was another quality setting for the 3:2 aspect ratio - for the lowest compression level (best quality) you have to use the standard size. Fuji has another camera coming out that is similar in design to this model (I think it's going to be the Z100 - it's not on the site yet), but adds optical image stabilization. I'll probably pick that model up after it drops in price a bit. I really love my Fujiflm cameras, very high quality in every regard, definitely the best value out there.
I wanted/needed more zoom and was intrigued about a camera designed with nature photographer in mind. . . was annoyed that Fuji went to a special battery and cautious about the reported 'major' problem with purple fringing - but decided to buy the S100fs anyway.
A) I have yet to be able to kill off the battery. I take mainly existing light photos with ALOT of zooming and changing settings - so almost the same as flash. . . I haven't even gotten a 'battery is half gone' indicator yet (after 295+ pictures on one charge over 4-5 days of shooting) - so that doesn't seem to be a problem.
B) OK - purple fringing - to be frank, I've had a HARD time getting it to do this, mainly because most of my shots are zoomed or wide-angled. Yesterday I tried really, really, hard to get the fringing to appear - it only shows up in shots at 55mm or so and was only really visible in a shot that I just wouldn't normally take - the sun was at an angle I didn't like and the sunlight was bouncing off the brick building, it was that bright out. Soooooooo, if you take a lot of pictures at 55 mm (why do you want an ultrazoom then) and like really bright light - then it's a concern.
C) I LOVE THIS CAMERA! There are some differences from the S9000 and lower series that is taking a bit of getting use to - i.e. only two positions on on/off switch - preview is achieved with another button on S100fs. They moved the macro button back to the 4-way on the back (instead of on the left side - for the S9000).
D) I have gotten some fantastic shots - for example, a damsel fly about 20-30 ft away (on a piece of grass) - I was able to zoom in, hit the 2x digital and get a incredible close up (with a little work - see below for webpage with example). The angle isn't the best, but it's a great example of what is possible with this camera! Insects can be a pain, since usually to get close enough to get a great, detailed, shot - it becomes obvious to them and they move.
E) I'm haven't tried much more than about 1/3 of the stuff available on this camera - but I am very, very, very happy with it.
I made up a webpage with some examples: [...]
It takes great out-door pictues, but not as good INDOORS or longer distance indoors. I was never sure if it looked better with or without flash and somtimes get blurry without flash due to it probalby holding the shutter open longer without flash. All depends on distance and lighting indoors. I was getting used to using my wifes camera,, a sony cybershot DSCH-10 which took much better pics indoors. But it is a double the cost camera. I like that it also takes regular SD or XD cards, but manual says the video may be jumpy on the SD cards depending?? The olympus version of this says it takes Micro SD, not the full size sd,and you would need that stupid adapter thing, but don't quote me on that. I also was looking for a cam that took AA batteries due to availability, but once you get a few ion battery packs, you should be set. Batt life was acceptable, but factory batteries are $$$. I got a couple maximal power's off ebay cheap, and they seem to be ok, though may not last as long as original. Im very leary on no name batteries, but for $7-$14 for Two,, I can't complain. I wish it had a 5mp setting. It looks like it goes from 4mp to 8 and 8.2. Over-all, im happy with the camera for a lower cost or backup/ something small camera.
Very easy to use on auto setting with good results.
Have had pics published in the local press and on the Raycam net site. Never thought my photos would ever reach the qualaty demanded.
A very good camera. To be recommended.
John T Hazlehurst.
I chose this camera because I already own a Fuji and thought familiarity with the brand would help in learning how to use it. Additionally, I was looking for a camera with a viewfinder, and one which would use my existing xD memory cards.
I am amazed at the number of different modes and functions this camera has! I've only had chance to play with a few of them so far, my current favourite being sunset mode, as we've been having some great ones locally since the camera arrived.
I've been quite surprised at just how quickly I feel comfortable with the camera and it's operation - it's really easy and intuitive and the grip makes one-handed use a doddle, especially since the on-off switch,the shutter button, and the zoom control are all at the top of the grip. It's smaller than I expected and very lightweight even with 4 AA batteries in!
All in all I am delighted with this purchase and I know the camera will be well used to take lots of photos for a long time in the future!!
This is my field camera. I take pics for three column newsprint runs, digital interview projects that document people in their homes, and sense of place photography. I always shoot in auto, sometimes macro.
When set on the highest resolution, the images are about 3.2 to 3.3 in size (ok for large newsprint applications) and the shutter speed is quick. Quick.
Best of all, the camera is completely silent- no shutter speed sound to distract people like my friend's lastest pro canon. It's small, it's light, and it's affordable.
The flash is super bright (I don't usually use it) and will light up the night, literally. The video is more than sufficient, and is smooth in frames, with across the yard sound of kids talking to you coming in clear.
I have owned three since the s5000, and- even as a pro- have no plans to switch cameras. The worst I can say about it is the body is crafted out of cheaper materials than the s5000 was, and I'm not fond of the hinged part of the battery case. But, it hasn't broke yet, and I've had it since it first shipped, and I batter it in my purse daily.
Oh- without the flash battery life is excellent, and you always find a couple more aa batts no matter the time or place.
All photos at [...] were taken with this camera. Have a look at pottery wall for closeups, and "people" (esp. k & d) for moving action shots.
Considering another for work in schools with kids...
If you plan to use this camera in isolation and are not concerned with the incompatibility of the card and the cable, then the camera is great. However, if you want a camera that allows flexibility in taking, transferring, and sharing pictures, I recommend getting camera more standard.
As a side note, I am also not happy with Fujifilm's contact us on the their website. They run you in circles and never actually give you an email address to make comments. So that is another x against them...
I haven't had time to check the Fuji out fully, but the one thing that I find a tad annoying is the lack of zoom when in video mode. The Konica was pretty good at that, except for the noise of the zoom and the 'out-of-focus' image for a short while, but I could edit that out. But the Fuji (which is my 2nd Fuji because I loved the first one!) doesn't offer a zoom facility.....once the recording starts you are stuck on the focal length selected when you started.
The S100fs is a real DSLR alternative at last - and this is from a REAL USER - not someone who has just read reviews or posts on the Internet.
The image quality is magnificent. Fuji have outdone themselves with this lens, it is a step above most Tamron, Sigma and kit lenses and approaches the quality of the higher priced offerings of the big manufacturers. The PROOF is in the images. I have standard scenes I always photograph to test cameras - one of them of the lake view from the rear of my house. Using the Velvia film setting on the S100fs I was astonished at the images it captured - some of them exhibiting an almost 3D appearance. This camera has produced the best images of this scene I have taken with any camera!
There is a lot of talk about Purple Fringing - mostly by Pixel Peepers who have never held the camera but who inspect low grade images uploaded to the Internet and make derisory comments. I have found however that using the camera involved a learning curve that I hadn't expected. Some of my first images were not as good as I had hoped - but I concluded that the camera was better than what I was seeing. More careful handling and attention produced startlingly better results. Have I seen some purple fringing - yes - but LESS than in Tamron and Sigma lenses I own, some of which approach the cost of this camera itself. This is easily corrected in post processing however. Though as I have spent more time with this excellent camera I have seen it less and less - implying that most of what people are seeing is USER error and not due to the camera itself.
And let me say this - IMAGES IN POOR LIGHTING / Night Scenes ARE MAGNIFICENT - better than my K10D!
If you are looking for the BEST superzoom camera out there - this is it - by far. If you are looking for a DSLR - but cannot afford the investment of good quality lenses (don't fall for the "kit offerings") - this is it. Tired of lugging around countless lenses and accessories for your DSLR - give this a try. You will not be disappointed (as long as you persevere and learn how to use this camera).
The only negatives are that it is battery power hungry when using the flash and higher resolutions, and on my model the flash fails to pop up when required due to it sticking on occasion.... but other wise it is sturdy, easy to use and the picture quality it gives is excellent.
The zoom control is a real problem - it's just to fast and awkward to frame the picture.
With hindsight I should of tried before I bought so now would give it 3 stars and learnt not to give instant reviews but to leave it a while for the novelty of something new to wear off !
I find I use my old Samsung more because it just slips into the pocket, carry anywhere, point and shoot. The S2000 is slightly to large for the average coat pocket so ideally needs to be carried in a camera bag. It is a different type of camera.







