Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Fujifilm Instax Mini 12
3936 отзывов пользователей o Fujifilm Instax Mini 12
Пользовались
Fujifilm Instax Mini 12?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
First impressions weren't bad : good menu system (though I never really understood why the F-button functions and the Menu were so confusing). The lens did extend longer than expected, but I could live with that.
But when taking the first pictures, I was truly disappointed. The images looked grainy, unsharp, undetailed. Like a camera from several generations ago. I then started experimenting with all the settings, abandoned the AUTO, tried every imaginable manual/high-quality/Low ISO setting, but I felt the results remained poor. I then compared with my little Canon Ixus 55, compared identical pictures... and found the Canon - smaller, lower Pixels,..) came out WAY better, WAY sharper, WAY more natural.
And that was just on low ISO. Going to ISO 200 and above? Forget it, quality was so terrible, you thought you'd be looking at one of those VGA cameras they give away as business gifts.
I tried and tried again to make the pics look good - in bright light, customized settings, everything... but again, disapointment....
Oh, I also noticed that at full lenght zoom, the camera refused to focus on objects 2-3 meter further. And there is an unacceptable amount of purple fringing.
So, after 2 weeks, I sold it, and bought the Panasonic FZ 18. And, though that too isn't perfect, at least that's acceptable, qualitywise!
Fujifilm FinePix A920 Digital Camera - Silver (9MP, Super CCD, 4x Optical Zoom) 2.7" LCD
The camera is light, but that is because where most quality camera manufactures use metal (usually an aluminum alloy) in the barrel (zoom lens) of the camera, Fujifilm uses plastic. And the plastic lens has around 125 thousandths movement from side to side when extended.
Fuji used to mean quality. I've owned several over the years, starting with the one I bought while serving in Vietnam. I wonder if Fujifilm is the same company. If so, the company seems to have lessened their standards.
Too bad a person couldn't "try before you buy," like some software manufactures offer.
I mostly use "Auto" and this does for ALL my needs.
If you are an amateur but need something more than a point and shoot - this is for you.
It is so easy to use. I love it!
My one qualm is that the software it came with sucks. It won't work properly on my new computer (and I don't have an old PC to test it on) and crashes when I try to upload photos from the camera. My PC does have a memory slot reader so I've been able to get around the problem without difficulty, but if the software and cabling are key for you, you might want to look into an alternative.
The camera works well, pity about the batteries, it would be better if it was rechargeable but battery life is OK.
I would be happpy to recommend it for a real amateur like me.
So, to sum it up - great picture quality, settings gallore, big lens. Great camera.
The features and menus are both easy to find and use.
It is small and lightweight but it feels well-built and durable.
I have tried the camera both indoors and outdoors with great results, it has the auto function but if you try using the the settings you may obtain better results.
I uploaded 3 pictures I took featuring my cat, and I must say I was amazed at the detail level obtained by the camera.
If you are on a budget this is definitely a great purchase.
I originally purchased my Canon as a replacement for my Sony F828 (unfortunately, Sony does not make any camera anymore that have the great design of the F828!), and I found myself struggling going backwards in time - missing the convenience of the F828 (tilting the body/lens) badly.
After doing a lot of research I ended up with the S100FS.
I can highly recommend this camera if you're (like me) in need of a good camera, but you just do not want to deal with the limitations of a DSLR.







