Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10040 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
I already own a Canon PowerShot S3 IS and I'm a fan of Canon cameras, so I wanted to buy another Canon. I was looking for something easier to use, more compact and lighter than the S3. I've studied the Canon cameras, read a lot of reviews and settled for an A550, but I wasn't very sure. I've discovered the SX by mistake, while visiting an electronics store. I was amazed by the clarity of the pics and the lightness, compared to the S3. And the zoom... it's actually hard to give up a 12x optical zoom like the one the S3 has, and that quality of images. But the SX proved to be a good choice. Reviews generally criticised the inacceptable noise at 1600 and the poor movie quality. I do agree about the ISO 1600, but movies seemed quite nice and the pictures are good even compared to the S3, although night isn't SX's best friend.
I recommend the SX100 for those who want something more than an A camera, but don't like the bulky feel of an S3 and need something portable and more friendly-user. Otherwise, go and buy an S3 or an S5, their quality in pics is better and the price is almost the same.
All in all, I'm happy with my little SX and thanks Amazon for the order. 4 stars from me - because night and ISO 1600 are poor and reaching for the USB port ain't very easy
The price is very good, my son bought one so thats why I got the same incase I need help.
Thanks
Irene
I don't know why people complain about low light performance. Professionals always have lots of light for video or movies - there isn't really any equipment out there that does a lot more in low light.
I took some test photos and video in a bedroom poorly lit by a desk lamp - the TX1 could shoot what I could see. It was really very dark. TX1 did better than other digital and film cameras I have used.
I have shot a lot of 35mm with ISO800 film indoors at night using fast lenses. TX1 with image stabilization can capture more quality images than I could before with a heavy camera and monopod. Maybe there are other cameras with better low light performance, but I still think the TX1 does an amazing job of low light work. It does have some trouble focussing in low light - which is not what dpreview said. (I am still working on figuring out the conditions in which the focus has problems.)
Infrared nightshot would be nice, as I have it on a mini-DV video camera, but practically its uses are limited.
Very few cameras will do macro to 0cm (16x12 field of view), without special macro lenses. Super macro with optical image stabilisation is amazing.
Pros:
color choice: For those of you without the money to buy Adobe Photoshop, this lets you pick a color and the picture only shows that color. It's really amazing, and a lot of fun to use for effects.
manual: it's got manual settings (along with some others) for those of us who know how to use them and want a little more out of a digital camera without buying an SLR.
Sturdy: In my opinion, it's a good camera; won't break easily. My dad dropped my first one onto concrete and the only thing that broke was the flash (yeah, that's pretty important, but if you keep the camera in a case, unlike I did, you'll be fine). I'm also not afraid to move the flip screen a lot; it doesn't feel like it will fall off.
7.1 MP: this is awesome. I can zoom in a ton on my computer, even if I can't with my camera. I get a ton of detail and can pick out what I want, even if it's really far away. I took some pictures of tigers at the zoo and I could zoom in so much I could see their fur. It was awesome.
Automatic settings: If, like me at first, you dont' know how to use all those crazy manual settings, there's a ton of other settings to pick from that you can use for pretty much anything. It makes it really easy for quick shots, no matter the conditions.
Cons:
No movement: If I try to take a picture of something moving fast, most of the time it's blurry on the auto settings. I have to go to manual settings, and if the lighting is crappy, don't even try it. The shorter you make the shutter speed, the less light gets in.
Focus: because it's digital, you can't focus on your own, and the camera just picks something it thinks is most important. There's tricks to get it to focus on what you want, but it's a little hard.
Weight: It's a little heavy, but it's worth it. It takes four AA batteries, but if you get rechargables, you're fine.
I haven't owned any other cameras, at least, this was my first digital, besides the family one, so I'm not as knowledgable as some others, but I've had it for quite a long time, so I've gotten used to it. It's a good camera, definitely worth the money!
PowerShot SX100 IS is a very similar camera to S1 but is smaller and comes with macro mode that I found very useful. I took the camera to many trips already and I have taken lots of pictures. The camera takes good quality pictures similar to those I took with S1IS. I really love larger screen (2,5 inches versus 1,5 inch), macro mode, manually pop-up flash. i dislike long time of recharging the flash that might be annoying to people taking lots of pics indoors.
I really like this camera and I really recommend it to anybody who wants to take good quality pictures. However S1 IS is as good as this one but larger and with smaller screen.
and easy to spot ! It has all the features I
was looking for in my price range. And of course
it is Canon quality.






