Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 7D

столкнусля со следующими проблемами: 1 при включение не включается экран- надо нажать на кнопку INFO она имеет три режима экрана. 2 на режимак с выдержкой и диафрагмой зеркало при нажатой...

I approach camera selection differently than most folks -- I start at the lens. Like a $200K sports car, you don't get the most out of it if you're rolling on bargain rubber. Same with a camera -- the glass makes it or breaks it. I will be talking about L-glass only in this review. If you're not interested in L-glass, you may still find it useful.FOCAL RANGEUnless you're a dedicated landscape or interior photographer, I find the L-glass selection of standard zoom lenses pointless if you have a full-frame camera like the 5D. They are just too wide for general purpose. Even the 24-105mm f/4L, if viewed on the 5D, looks like the equivalent of a mere 65mm on a 1.6x crop sensor like the 7D. I find that approximately 70mm on a 1.6x is the equivalent to what your naked eye sees. To get the same effect on a 5D, you need at least 112mm. The problem is, at that length, large-aperture L-glass starts at 70mm, so you're losing your wide angle capability.PERFORMANCE IN LOW LIGHT (HIGH ISO)Large-aperture glass should always be your first weapon, and consider ISO your "Plan B". This is where it gets interesting. The 5D performs better than the 7D at high ISO due to its full-frame sensor. But lets look at our lens choices. For standard zoom, we have the 24-70mm F/2.8L and 24-105 F/4L. Remember our little issue about focal range? If I want to combat the "too wide" issue of the 5D and upgrade to the 24-105mm F/4L, I'm losing a full F-stop. So even though the 5D performs better in low light, I'm getting more light onto the sensor with a F/2.8 mounted on a 7D. In other words, I've leveled the technology playing field and both cameras are producing nearly the same quality of image right now. Except the 5D MkII costs $700 more (!)CONCLUSIONI can think of only one type of person who would receive an advantage with a 5D MkII -- someone who needs to shoot in low light often (without a tripod) and owns BOTH a 24-70mm F/2.8L AND 70-200mm F/2.8L. Anything slower and you're defeating the purpose of a 5D. Considering the newer technology in the 7D (which I didn't even touch on), the 7D is clearly the most practical for most folks and WAY better bang for buck.

Прошло чуть более двух лет после приобретения данной модели. С тех пор как семерка была анонсирована, я понял, что этам камера мне нужна. Я очень люблю творческую, художественную фотографию, и прекрасно понимаю, что для этого нужен фуллфрейм, соответственно 5д марк 2 я до сих пор хочу, и этот фотик будет моим следующим приобретением. Но так вышло, что зарабатываю я в основном на репортаже. И когда я только начал пользоваться семёркой, я был полностью удовлетворен работоспособностью этой камеры. Фокусировка+скорострельность - меня убила наповал и это с учетом того, что в начале у меня был обычный тамрончик 17-50 без юсм мотора, ну и кэнон 85 1.8 юсм - тут я конечно просто остолбенел от скорости. Карту памяти я купил не самую блатную, но кадров 6 в секунду получал точно и мне этого хватало, затем еще шустрее карту взял и 8 кадров получал отчетливо. Конкретно в...

Был куплен в феврале 2012 и успешно продан в ноябре.
Если вы репортажный фотограф,фотокорреспондент или фотоохотник с ограниченным бюджетом-то это ваша модель,в остальных случаях-это обычная кроп-камера в очень качественном исполнении и с хорошим автофокусом...

I love this camera. It is packed full of essential features, which take some time to learn and get used to, but it is well worth the effort put into it. What I especially like in the Canon 7D is the fast shutter speed and sensitive autofocus. Also, the fact that it's a cropped sensor (1.6x) sits well with me, since I use this camera mostly for wildlife, with a Canon 100-400 L 4.5-5.6 and the combo Canon 70-200 F2.8+Canon 2x Extender. The extra reach afforded by the camera itself comes in handy.

I purchased this camera a month ago as an upgrade from my Rebel XSi. I considered a couple of Nikon models, but wanted to keep compatability with my existing, and growing, Canon glass collection. I considered the 5D, but decided that for outdoor sports photography, often taken at the long end of 250mm, which has been my main focus, so to speak, that it did not make sense to pay up for a full-frame camera that would also require longer lenses. So I went with the best APS-C camera Canon offers - the 7D.It is notably larger and heavier than my XSi. Mostly I like the extra heft, but it is a mixed blessing. Certainly the solid feel is nice. Also nice for sports is the 8fps in servo mode,which is gatling-gun fast. The dual processors also help display images quickly, unlike the long lag in my XSi.This is a high-performance camera for photographers who know at least a bit about what they are doing. It is not a camera for newbees. For example, there are no "sport" or "landscape" modes built in, as there are in the XSi. There are custom modes, but you need to know something about the camera, and about photography, to create and use them effectively. This is not a complaint, just something you should understand if you are considering buying this camera.Coming from the XSi, I found the controls took some getting used to. Even after a couple of months, I still find myself using the quick dial when I need to use the main dial, and vice versa. And some controls that were easy to access on the XSi, like White Balance, are not quite as easy to access/change on the 7D in some cases. White balance is a particular gripe. It's displayed in the top LCD, but the icons are too small for me to see well, so I wind up using the main LCD, going through screens, etc.The ability to use ISO settings above 1600 to capture indoor action was a major reason I upgraded, and the 7D does very well on this front, albeit to date I not often needed to venture over 3200.Image quality has been very good, though not notably better than the XSi. I take mostly action shots rather than portaits or landscapes, so the gating factor in terms of image quality for me is typically the abilty to use a sufficiently fast shutter speed rather than sensor size/resolution. The higher ISO settings available on the 7D do help in that regard.Improved autofocus was another reason I upgraded from the XSi, and in this regard, the 7D excels. The ability to select groups of the 19 sensors provides a lot of flexibility for different situations, and the ability to strike a balance between the control offered by single-point autofocus, and the cover of multiple points for those shots where a subject in motion may not be covered by the central point. My rate of in-focus action shots improved dramatically using the 7D, and now after having used it I would not want to go back to the XSi's 9 widely-spaced sensors for sports shooting.In sum, this camera is very capable, but does not suffer fools gladly. The question is, is it $1000 more camera than an XSi, or $600 more than a 60D, when $800 more can get you a 5D with a full frame sensor and the image quality and noise reduction improvements that come with that? For my purposes, I would buy this camera again, and would recommend it to anyone who shoots sports and doesn't have the budget for a 1D.

Сей фотоаппарат покупался мной под конкретные цели- съёмка футбола и экстремального спорта. И его скоростельность в 8 к/с создана именно для этого. Про него и так много написано, но всё же мне хочется отметить немного важных моментов: Оптика. Для данного фотика- только топовое стекло L серии(для недорогой есть 650D). Серийная съёмка на макс. скорости- только Jpeg. Купившим счастливую Семёрку, советую докупить батт. блок и доп. аккумулятор. Пока всё.

i use this camera atleast 2-3x a week for taking pictures of wildlife, weddings, sports, events. i am still an amateur photographer and i am still trying to learn however i feel like even though this might be a bit too advance for me learning with this camera makes learning the functions a lot of fun because every shot taken carefully comes out great.this camera is especially good for low lighting settings no need for flash at all, just make sure you have a tripod.if you are hesitant about buying a camera like this, thinking that it might be too much to handle for a beginner, dont' hold back because there are plenty of how to videos and tutorials on youtube which is what i did and the more i learn about the camera the more i love it even though its not a full frame with a good lense that won't make a differencethe lens that comes with the kit is great althought if you really want to take photography seriously i would recommend to later on upgrade to a L glass lens

При покупке был выбор между пятеркой и семеркой. Предварительно с продавцом обсуждались цели, для которых будет использоваться аппарат.
Если кратко, сради моих задач съемка быстродвижущихся объектов. Как пример - авиашоу, автоспорт.
Для этого важны 1 - точность автофокуса, 2 - скорострельность серийной съемки. Был проведен простой тест. Две камеры 7D и 5D Mark II с одинаковыми объективами EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM. Объект съемки - птичка на расстоянии примерно 4 метров. Птичку спугнули, она полетела в сторону.
О результатах в двух словах: Серийной съемку с 5D Mark II назвать трудно. Даже 4 кадра в секунду не получается скорее 2-3. Фокус на птичке уплыл уже после второго кадра в серии, "поймав" в итоге статичный объект. 7D показал отличный результат. Полноценные 7-8 кадров в секунду. Очень точная фокусировка на птичке до того, как она исчезла из поля зрения.
Стоит заметить, что этот тест нисколько не преуменьшает достоинства пятерки. И, скажем, при съемке в студии статичного объекта пятерка конечно же выигрывает полным кадром. Отсюда вывод - обе камеры хороши, но назначение разное. Семерка больше репортажная. Качество же самих снимков у обоих на высоте.

I have only used the camera twice but am finding some new features, I plan on learning more about the video application. so far so good,

Уже 8 лет снимаю зеркалками (были 350, 400, 500D 30, 40, 50D)-т.е. есть с чем сравнивать в аналогичном сегменте.

Появилось по сравнению с прошлыми: с одной стороны удобное добавление режима фокусировки по...

The ergonomics are wonderful with numerous customizable buttons that are placed conveniently. Great for the intended sports photography functionality as well as other areas of interest. Wonderful choice prior to one's entrance to the professional field. It is suggested to look up specifications and tests online for better understanding.

Очень хорошая модель, значительно обгоняет 5d mark по автофокусу и многим...

A great camera, however the pop-up flash failed. I looked to find several people with the same problem. I did the trouble shooting recommended, but after two times it failed again and will not open but gives an error code. Max Brown

I was looking for a HDSLR to replace a Panasonic HMC40 camcorder. I wanted to shoot more light weight and still wanted that shallow DOF in my images. The Panasonic was good, but I still needed to get a Letus adapter to get the same look. So I started researching What Canon and Nkion had to offer. I am already a Nikon guy and I have the terrific D7000. That camera also does 1080p video, but the only issue is that you can't change the aperture settings while in the live movie mode. But for taking pictures, the camera is my go to body for sure. That left me with a choice between the Canon 60D and the 7D. I was looking at the 60D mainly to save some $$ over the 7D, but in most of the reviews that I looked at the 7D was a better fit with the dual Digic 4 processors. Plus it more in the same class as the Nikon with the magnesium alloy body as well. But like I said, I was looking at this from the perspective that I was only going to use this camera for videos and not photos.I got the body and the Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 and the Canon 50mm 1.4 as the starting point. In my opinion, both of these lenses are a great fit for shooing video. I did not want to get the kit lens, because most of all kit lenses are average at best. Having a constant aperture lens is great because wherever the zoom is, the lens is still fast. I got the prime for more close up work and low light use with the 1.4. The camera body itself is big, but not as big and chunky as the D7000. lots of control buttons and menus to go through but it you take the time to learn them, well worth it. Shooting video is really great because you have complete manual control over every aspect of the camera while in live mode. White balance, aperture and ISO so that you can get that great exposure at the start. I love the fact that you can visually see the changes in the live view. With the Nikon, to change aperture, you have to get out of live view, make the change reset the light meter and then re-engage live mode to set it.I have the 7D mounted to the iDC System Zero base plate with follow focus. Attached to this I have the Rode Video Mic Pro and a Zoom H4N recorder for dual System sound. I also have a couple of XLR shotguns and a pair of Sennheiser G3 lavs for interview work. I also use a Manfrotto 501HDV head and tripod as well as a GlideTrack HD 1m Slider. This system works really well of for most of my on the go HDSLR video productions.

I paid over $1,800 for the body and the RAW file takes 25M bytes, which is more than twice the size than my previous camera. So, I assumed that the picture quality should be good. Yes, the picture quality is indeed good, ONLY IF you resize the 25Mbytes of RAW file into something like 1024 pixels width, at ISO 400 and above. You buy a cheap point and shoot camera, and it's image quality will be incredible in low ISO and when there is enough light. We pay more and spend more memory (and pay extra for that) for DSLR to get more descent ISO performance when there isn't enough light. If you willing to resize to 1024 pixel width, there is no problem in high ISO - but then why would you spend 25Mbytes for the RAW ? And why would you pay $1,800 for the body ?I took about 40 pictures in a gathering. It was in the evening and light was more than enough to read books very comfortably. So, at least the light was enough not to create bad quality pictures. However, I used high ISO (1600 and 3200) so that I don't have any blurred pictures. Besides, I read so many praises by 7d fanatics about how good 7D's ISO performance was. Somehow, I trusted them. But I was very surprised to see so many white dots/pixels in the dark area when viewed in 100%, as I showed in the uploaded picture. Indeed, there is no problem if you down-sample (resize) to 1024 pixel width. You won't be able to see them.I asked around about this problem and there were two types of responses. One is that it is the expected behavior of 7D, which has so many pixels in a small sensor. And I need to remap those white pixels using software. Indeed, LightRoom does it automatically. But not DPP (Raw processing software from Canon). And LightRoom is not ready for 7D as of now. The other response is that 7D is so good in high ISO performance, and I must have gotten a lemon. I hesitated what to do. And I just decided to return it and try an another 7D, only finding that this was a disaster. The new one showed the exactly the same behavior. In addition, the new one has hot pixels that appear even in ISO100. In fact, there are five such dead pixels. I know that this is OK, only if they are spread around. Unfortunately, all those five pixels are adjacent together and the whole white dead spot area is quite visible in every picture.So, I don't know at this moment what to do. I will definitely return this 7D that has the dead pixels. But unfortunately I can only exchange. Would I just exchange to another 7D and live with those white dots in high ISO, and be satisfied with down-sample'ed pictures ? Or would I exchange to other Canon camera or even Nikon... Anyway, my opinion is that this camera should not be this expensive and waste 25Mbytes for the RAW file just to create this kind of bad images in mid to high ISO. And for my horrible experiences, I can only give one star. But YMMV.--edit---OK, I decided to get the replacement of 7D - this is the 3rd one. This time, I was tired. Whatever it is, I would just take it. I'll live with white dots or some dead pixels or whatever. Let it be my destiny... So, I did not go through mid-to-high ISO testing, and I don't know what it would be this time - and I would not care any more. But then when I took some pictures, I found that they were so soft. I investigated, and saw that 7D is not focusing correctly. The lenses required AF micro-adjustments. At least the previous two 7Ds did not have this AF problem and need not AF microadjustments, as the manual says. They were focusing correctly. Since the 3rd 7D is not, I went through AF micro-adjustments. However, I also found out that the AF microadjustment at particular distance and aperture is not global within one lens adjustment. For example, if I set the microadjustment correctly at F2.8 from 1 foot (this was +15), AF at F 5.6 from 7 feet was very fuzzy. So, I set the AF microadjustment from the setting, and the value was - 20, but then the pictures are fuzzy at F2.8 from 1 foot distance. I tried to find the middle value which would work in all cases, but once I found a AF miroadjustment for particular distance and aperture, it wasn't working for other aperture and distance. So, there is no global setting for one lens. It varies depending on the distance and aperture within one lens adjustment. What a bummer... I think that a lot of people who are complaining about 7D's AF problems have 7Ds like the one that I have now. BUT if you take picture at F8.0 or higher, AF will look OK - not because 7D works correctly, but because at this aperture the depth of field is deeper.So, for all the people who praise Cannon 7D, either you are extremely lucky people, or you just don't care/know about the details.Or I am the extremely unlucky person ...

вполне...

I upgraded to 7D about 3 months ago, skipping 60D. I'm so glad I did! I consider my picture taking style - always chasing my dogs and kids to capture on the move. It was an easy decision to make as 7D offers the best fps, and another major decision factor, the super tough body that is weather proof. Turned out 7D is not only perfect for the picture taking on the move, but performs wonderfully in low light situations. Love the arrangement of function buttons as well as back lit panel for the night time shooting. If you set correctly, 7D also surpass to take wonderful night sky shot. Super tough magnesium body gets rid of the concern little dings and dongs while in action, and any outdoor photo shoots, you don't have to worry about weather as it is weather proof (but you have to make sure that your lens can take it). For those who worry about the weight of this camera, or any midsize DSLR, 7D's body is shaped so easy to grab and handle, feels very good and secure to the hand. The video quality of 7D is outstanding, I got rid of my handheld compact VCR! For faster writing of the photo files, I recommend to use a high speed CF card, like Transcend 600X, which I've been using it with my 7D, and it's been working wonderful.I'll keep using 7D until I save up enough to upgrade to 5D Mark III eventually, but at the moment, I'm very happy to find the perfect camera that fits my lifestyle!

Своих денег аппарат, безусловно стоит. Выбор стоял между 60D и 7D соответственно. Окончательно все решилось, когда взял его в руки... По поводу отзывов за его плохую видео-съемку, говорю сразу - бред. Во-первых...

I purchased the Canon EOS 7D to use exclusively for short film and music video work. Prior to buying, I spent a fair amount of time researching the pros and cons of shooting video with DSLRs in general, and specifically as it relates to the 7D.Initially what I had read about the "rolling shutter" issue with DSLRs had me concerned. Essentially the shutter is held open and the image from the lens is recorded off the sensor in a vertical linear fasion. (ie. in "rows") In fast-moving subjects, or if the camera is panned too quickly, this can yield a "jello" effect. For instance, a fast pan of a tall building could cause the building to appear more diagonal than vertical.Thus far, I've had no noticeable issues with rolling shutter. The nature of careful shooting at 24fps (ie. being mindful of panning speeds to avoid jarring/judder, etc.) helps greatly here.Prior to the 7D, I was using a Canon VIXIA HF100 as my main camera, attached to a 35mm depth-of-field adapter. We still use the Vixia as our handy "home movie" camera (It is, afterall, a nice camera!). However, after using the Canon EOS 7D, I don't think I could ever go back to a standard video camera - or any camera that involves a depth-of-field adapter - for short film shooting.Here are the reasons: - No need to flip the video (in the case of 35mm DOF adapters) - Wide array of lenses to choose from. (I use my old M42/Pentax lenses + $12 EOS adapter.) - Convenient video codec (H.264 .MOV file... drops right into most any NLE) - Extreme low-light capability (Wide ISO range can be adjusted quickly) ...great for natural or available-light shooting. - Totally customizable (more below)Starting with my older Canon GL2, I've had a habit with every camera I've owned... that is, I dial the sharpness all the way down (no electronic enhancing) and also knock the saturation down a bit. This tends to give a bit more lattitude in post for color correcting. While the Canon EOS 7D has a LOT of menu options, I was able to figure this out after spending 15 minutes or so flipping through the menus. I now have C1 on my dial set for 1920x1080 24p, 1/50 shutter, no sharpening, low contrast, and a few other features either enabled or disabled. I also have the ISO defaulted to around 200, but this can be quickly changed while shooting, via a button on the top-right and selecting the ISO from the list.Audio recording is an area I read as a drawback to the camera, but I capture all sound wild so it wasn't a big deal in my case. For those requiring quality audio on-camera a quality shotgun mic could help.Being so small... you'll definitely want to add something to this camera to get a bigger form-factor. I've read great things about the Z-Finders but I don't have one yet as they are quite expensive. They can greatly aid in focusing, particularly in bright outdoor shoots, and they give that extra point of contact against your eye for stability. I'm using the IndiFocus setup I'd used previously with the Vixia. Generally speaking, bulking the camera up really improves shots and prevents the jittery look you may get when shooting with a DSLR alone. I find the camera's LCD display to be sufficient for focusing. (One other nice feature: Just prior to shooting, you can hit the zoom/magnifier to ensure your subject is in tack-focus before pressing record.)I'm researching variable ND (neutral density) filters, as one of those is a must for bright outdoor shooting, in cases where you want to maintain the shallow depth of field but not crank up the shutter speed and get that stacatto freeze-frame appearance. Standard NDs can be used as well, but it would likely require a set of them to stack on and remove as needed, which in my opinion wouldn't be as preferable as a single adjustable filter.At any rate, the camera itself is just fantastic. I really can't say enough good things about it for its video capability. It's a pleasure to use, gives total control over the look, and captures stunning HD footage!

Almost everything is perfect, except that it is not water proof. I understand there may be specific products for DSLRs to overcome this shortcoming, but if itself had this feature it would be great. BTW, this is my 2nd 7D, my last one was destroyed by sea water 1 month after the purchase :-( Couldn't believe it was not functional after being touched by the wave slightly and shortly...

Люди пишушие нелестные отзывы про семёрку либо им не снимали долго, либо...

This is considered a prosumer camera, yet my wife uses it for her arial work attaching her Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM Lens and hangs out airplane windows getting amazing shots she didn't even get with film.My son bought one and uses it for his professional video work in NYC shooting HD for the likes of Disney (his rig is extensive).Price/performance both my wife & son paid for their rigs in months.