Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 5D Mark III

This has been my dream camera and I was soooooo happy when I got it as a gift. This is a major upgrade from my canon 40D (but I still kept it) It's beyond comparison, the picture quality that it produces and ease of use - it's so worth it. If you're thinking of getting one, get it. You will not regret it. You'll definitely have fun taking pictures.

I have spent so much on professional photography for my daughter, and although I consider myself a hobbyist photographer, I never thought I could get the same quality. I used a Nikon D90 for a while, and my pictures were nice, but didn't have the same WOW factor that I got with my professionally shot photos.Since I started using my 5D Mark III, my pictures are in a different ballpark. It's way too simplistic to say that the camera makes the picture ... because a great photographer can take amazing shots with an iPhone ... lighting, framing ... lots more to a shot than the camera.But I will say that with the 5D in my hands I haven't taken a bad shot. I've done some sessions for friends, and through word of mouth I've gotten inquiries for some paid shoots and have done a few (so I guess I'm borderline past hobbyist).Also, the low light performance is INSANE. I get clear sharp shots in dimly lit rooms without a flash. Took some family shots in a restaurant for my daughter's birthday, and they're perfect ... even with low lighting.Love this camera in every way. And the kit lens is really well past what you expect from a kit lens.

UPDATE as of 17 June 2012:I have now taken more than 10,000 shots with my new 5D mk3. I have returned from a trip to Italy where I took about 4000 shots over 11 days. I traveled light and only used two lens (24-105 IS and 70-200 IS),90% using the 24-105. I did not use a flash, about 70% were inside shots. The low light (many at ISO 12,800) performance was very good to excellent and allowed shots that could not have been taken as flash was not allowed in many inside locations. My outside shots were excellent with outstanding color and sharpness.This is a great camera!The July 2012 issue of Popular Photography has reviews of the Canon 5D mk3 and the Nikon D800. The Test Results sections are very interesting.Keep having fun.Original Review:First let me say that I don't appreciate people who write a review on a product that they have not used. I believe that anyone who rates the new 5D MkIII below 4 stars has not properly evaluated this camera. It is excellent and I only have one gripe (I wish it had a simple built-in fill flash as my D700 and 7D have/had).My last two favorite DSLRs were the Nikon D700 and Canon 7D; both were excellent and worthy of a five star rating when they were introduced. Until now the D700 was my only Full Frame DSLR but I gave it to my nephew (my nephew has become a very good photographer) after I used my 7D for several months. Because of the high cost of lens and other accessories, I have now decided to standardize on Canon. As a side note, I plan to keep my 7D or it's replacement as I like the 1.6 crop factor for telephoto work. The 7D body is less expensive than most good telephoto lens ( I already own the EF 100-400 ).I received my new 5D MkIII from Amazon on March 26th and have taken about 1200 shots. What I like best about the new 5D is the quality of my pictures. I also enjoy 2 stops + or - higher ISO performance ( vs D700 and 7D ) and at a recent Easter dinner event was able to take all my shoots w/o a flash (95% were taken inside) using f/4 lens (24-105 IS and 70-200 IS). I used Av mode with Auto ISO ( Auto ISO set to Max range ). I try to keep Av at f8 unless I have a depth of field, shutter or ISO issue. The 61 Point AF worked well but I also used single-point Spot AF alot. Auto WB was excellent. Evaluative metering was used as my default but I used Spot metering with certain light issues. I did not record in RAW for this family event. I recorded Large jpegs to my CF card and small jpegs to the SD card. Only a few shots needed a slight adjustment in Photoshop. I absolutely LOVE the Q function when I forget what I am doing ( thanks 7D ).I have played a little bit with my 50mm f/1.4 len in low light and my pictures are better than "my eyes".So far all is good and I am having fun.

After some years, finally I got my 5D. I took some pics son my last trip to China... and the quality of pics is wonderful.

Love this so far, great upgrade from my 7d (Non full frame). the 24-105 lens on this camera actually is a good low light lens compared to the same lens on my 7d. Nice sturdy build and outstanding pics, also the HDR mode works nicely also.

I am upgrading from the original 5D to the 5D Mark III. This is exactly the upgrade I was looking for. I skipped the Mark II because canon decided to retain the AF which was a constant source of frustration in anything other than broad day light.This is a perfect upgrade for me because of the low light capability, AF, speed, customability, etc. This model corrects and improves on the feature set of the original 5D and the Mark II. So this more of an evolutionary camera not a revolutionalry one like the D800.In correcting and improving features of the the previous 2 models, canon has created a near perfect camera, but there are some cons that would prevent it from being a 10.0.Cons:1. PRICE: This is a big one. Canon decided to increase the price by $500 because they were delivering a near perfect camera. This becomes less palatable because of the release of the D800 and D800e which have a revolutionary sensor at a $500 less price.2. Disabled feature set:Metering : Canon deliberately did not include features like the metering of the 1DX unlike the D800 which has the same AF and metering as it's big brother.HDMI out : Video out quality is not high quality uncompressed unlike the D800AF linked spot metering : This is a big omission. Canon in it's infinite wisdom reserves this for only it's professional model, while Nikon has it in every model.UDMA enabled SD slot: the canon implementation is on the slower cards, the D800 has the faster UDMA SD standard.USB: canon uses the slower 2.0 standard, the D800 has USB 3.0AF assist light : would have really helped in low light.3. Sensor technology : There is essentially very little advancement from the Mark II's sensor. The D800's Sony sensor is revolutionary with incredible resolution without paying a penalty for cramming 36 MP in the same size sensor.I guess canon listened to it's user base on some issues but decided not to reward it's loyal users. This seems to be the direct opposite of what Nikon is doing. While this is disappointing to me as a Canon user for 20+ years, the Mark III camera is the first camera that is close to near perfect in ergonomics and usability. Canon missed a chance to make another legendary T90 type camera that it had done in the past.So highly recommended with some reservations (see cons). I am definitely going to enjoy this camera.Kenko High-Spec. LCD Protector for Canon EOS 5D Mark III camera | KLP-CEOS5DM3N

The New Canon 5D Mk IIII have a Canon 5D Mk II and it's been a real work horse. I love the Canon glass and the photos that the 5D Mk II produces. So when the 5DMk III was announced, I ordered it - even at the steep price of $3,500.00 USD. I like the way Canon delivers their products soon after the announcement - wish Nikon did the same, but I digress. I've been using it now for a couple of weeks. There are several things I like about the newest 5D Gen:1. The Auto Focus is much faster in actual use. Setting it up is another matter.2. The locking mode switch is nice - Canon charged me $100.00 to mod my 5DMk II for this feature.3. There is in- camera correction of chromatic aberration (CA) and vignetting of select lenses . Why Canon didn't install this in the camera out of the box is questionable. You have to load software and manually select the lenses from a list and install them into the camera YOURSELF. While not a problem for most people, with a price tag of $3,500.00 USD, why not spare us that drill? Just saying. There are some older lenses missing from the list too (oh well.)4. The on-off switch is now on top of the camera instead of at the bottom - this is a big plus for me at least. In my clumsiness I often inadvertently switched the 5DMk II off when pulling it out of the bag.5. I like the location of the Depth-of-Field (DOF) preview button - now I only need one hand to preview and shoot (thanks Canon!)6. I haven't done any scientific testing of either camera, but I do see a bit of improvement in the Image Quality in the 5D Mk III, and the low-light images are far better - this is probably due to the re-working of the sensor.7. This is totally subjective: It just feels better in my hands.This all adds up to an incrementally better camera than the 5D Mk II. But it's not the "game-changer" that the original 5D was. The 5 D Mk III is not a "revolutionary" model. It's a lovely upgrade from the 5D Mk II, but there's really no compelling reason to ditch your 5D Mk II and switch to the 5 D Mk III. I have the feeling that the Nikon D800 has stolen the thunder of the 5D Mk III, and will cause many people to jump ship - simply because the D800 IS a major game changer and it IS REVOLUTIONARY, while the 5D Mk III just isn't. By the way, I've already ordered my D800 (sorry Canon.)I have one major complaint with my 5DMk III and that is that I cannot save the Custom 1, 2, 3 features I want. This can probably be fixed in a subsequent firmware update, but it's been a royal pain for me in the meantime. I was able to save one Custom setting, and I have not been able to add C2 and C3. It's just not possible. Hope Canon fixes this soon before I go nuts.

Wish it came with a warranty!! I've gotta buy one separate which kinda sucks. Still cheaper than at a store. BEST BUY WILL PRICE MATCH ANY AMAZON PRODUCTS I LEARNED WHILE BUYING A FLASH MEMORY CARD. IF YOU FIND A DEAL THROUGH AMAZON, GO TO BEST BUY AND GET IT THERE WITH THE PRICE MATCH. THEN YOU'LL GET A 1 YEAR WARRANTY WITH IT.

Photography:+ Improved High ISO Performance (Up to 102,400)+ Faster Focusing System (Similar to 7D)+ New & Improved Digic 5+ Processor (Dual Core) 14x Faster Than Digic 4+ Faster Burst Shooting+ Gains 1 Extra Megapixel from its Predecessor but Nikon D800 is 36MP (Cheaper Than 5D)- Still No AF Light, Needed for taking Pictures in Dim Light Situations (Nikon Has One)- No Pop Up Flash! (Nikon Has One)- Price Increase from it's Predecessor- Still Slow AF in Live View Mode (Taking Pics with LCD Screen)- No APSC or DX Mode, Shrinks Your Sensor Size and Gives Your Lens 1.5, 1.6x more Reach (Sony & Nikon has it)Video:+ Improved ISO Performance+ Improved Moire & Aliasing in Video+ Improved Rolling Shutter+ Head Phone Jack for Audio Monitoring+ Can Record Video Up to 29'59 Minute Before Stopping (Because of European Law)+ Improved Video Bit Rate+ Added Timecode- Still Lame Video Codecs, No 1080p at 60fps (Panasonic & Sony Has it)- No Tele Converter/APSC Crop Mode, Extended your Lens 1.5, 2, 2.9, 3.6x, etc. More (Panasonic & Sony Has it)- No Full Time Auto Focus for Video (Panasonic & Sony Has it)- Dynamic Range Still Sucks (Black Magic Cinema Camera has 14 stops, Cheaper Than 5D)- Video Resolution is Soft (Panasonic & Sony is Much Sharper)- HDMI Out is Not Clean, Compressed (Not Good for External Recorders)- No SDI or XLR Inputs (Black Magic Cinema Camera has it)- Cinema Lens Selection is Limited Due to Mirror Flap, Flange Distance & No Crop Mode for Video (Sony Has it)- No Vari-Angle or Touch Screen (Sony & Panasonic Has it)- No Peaking, that help manual focusing (Sony Has It)I'm Proud that Canon Help Pioneer the Video DSLR Revolution with the 5D Mkii, But After Many Years and Attempts with the 7D, Rebels, 500D, 550D, Etc. They are Only Mild Changes.New Exciting Affordable Video Cameras are on the Horizon, Panasonic GH3, Black Magic Cinema Camera, Sony NEX 6, A99, FS100, VG900. Canon Better Step Up their Game.The New Canon 6D is Not the Answer, I'm 99% Sure it's Just a Dumb Down 5D with Wifi & GPS Photo Tagging.Guess We Will Have to Wait Until Digic 6, Until We Get the Full Frame Canon Video DSLR of Our Dreams

I went from Canon EOS 60D DSLR with 3 Prime lenses, EF-50mm F/1.4 EF-85 F/1.8, Sigma 35mm F/1.4. I have been shooting 50/50 still and video for about a year and I finally decide to go full frame. I was so tore between 6D and 5D mrk III. I chose the 5D mrk III because it has the advance auto focus system of a $7000 camera, Canon EOS 1DX. The camera is high quality build and it felt good in my hands. Took me a while to get used to with the menu and buttons. But after a few hrs of messing with it. I now love the 5D mark III lay out. I got some 1000X CF cards and will try out raw video soon. This is a awesome camera with a awesome price to go with it. I went with the kit lens 24-105, over all I am very happy and a big hole in my wallet.

If so, do yourself a major favor and buy the 5DIII now. You know you want to, or you would not be reading these reviews. Like many 7D owners, I've wanted to step up to full frame for years. I agonized over the price of the 5DIII. Is it worth it? Is it THAT much more satisfying to use than a 6D? I asked myself and read every review that I could. After biting the bullet and buying the 5DIII, I got my answer within the first hours of shooting: HELLZ YEAH!This camera isn't for everybody. If you're stepping up from a Rebel, you'll be just as happy or happier with a 6D. If you use a camera occasionally for family photos and vacation pics, this camera is probably expensive overkill. But if you're a serious enthusiast-- particularly one who has pushed a 7D to its limits, you're going to love the 5DIII. (If you're a pro, it's a business decision and you probably aren't looking to Amazon reviews for guidance).The image quality and handling are nothing short of amazing. With the ability to add lens profiles, this camera makes even your cheapest glass look stellar. My 50 mm 1.4 USM looks better with this camera than the $1,200 50 mm 1.2 L does on a 5DII. And if you own any L glass, there aren't enough superlatives for how fantastic they look when shot with the 5DIII.If you can part with the money, buy with confidence. You'll get over the financial pain as soon as you see your first test shots.

Before I bought the 5diii, I has been relying on Rebel T3i, S95, Sony NEX-7, Sony RX-100, as well as my daughter's Canon 7d.I rely on auto mode most of the time, sometimes Programmed auto and manual mode.Sony RX-100 is a great P&S, NEX7 is also great camera to own, but I think Canon 5diii has a little better IQ when you need it, trading off the weight and inconvenience to carry, most of the time Sony NEX7 will do the job.I was in search of a best picture quality, reliable DSLR camera, that can be owned for a long time without worrying what is hottest model this month.After purchase and spent extensive time, among Nikon d3200, d800, then this Canon 5diii, Canon 5diii is my favorite.At the beginig hoping Nikon can do wonder for me, but after purchased and spent some time with D3200 and D800, I was very disappointed at the IQ, so I got rid of the Nikon d3200, and d800.Canon 5diii (with 28~105mm L, and 70~300mm L lens) to my eyes has most natural color, very sharp, like high end audio tube analog components vs digital sound (Nikon), unbelievable low light performance, great auto mode, great focus speed, you do not need much skill to take great photos.Using Live View, focus sometimes slowed down a bit, but using EVF focus is lightening fast.Even in the evening without flash, this camera is very capable.(I had some problem with Canon Rebel 3i, in low light condition)I also bought a Canon 430ii flash, works great and very easy with the 5diii.So the 3 camera I own now, the Sony RX-100, NEX-7, and Canon 5diii, each one serves well in its condition.In a word, I am extremely happy with the Canon 5diii purchase, other than a little bulky ( so are other DSLRs), this camera I think will serve a long time.

As much as I can be in love with a camera I am. I moved up from a 7D because I was shooting more and more weddings and the full frame and awesome auto focus system were desired. Could I have kept on making it with the 7D...you bet and it wouldn't have been hard. My second shooter needed a camera so the 7D went there and the Mark III is now my go to.

How good is it? After getting this camera, I stop looking for another one. Now I can spend all my time taking and enjoying pictures.

I received the camera today to supplement my library of cameras and lenses. I am not a pro; I'm a physician with a photography hobby. My current shooters are a Nikon D700, a Canon 40D and a Canon 5D. They are all fantastic cameras. In just the several hours I've had it, shot with it - primarily with my 35-1.4 L and my 50-1.8 - it's great. Given that I already have stock in both the Nikon and Canon camps, I could have easily gone with the D800 or D800E. So in this (?initial?) posting, let me tell you what shaped my decision between the 5D Mark III and the D800.The Fred Miranda website did a direct comparison between the two and the D800 outperformed the 5D Mk III especially in the high contrast / dark area noise category. The Ken Rockwell review put the 5D Mk III on top. Site after site went back and forth, but the only review which gave pretty dramatic, objective material going against the Canon was the Fred Miranda review. But I had read about the High Dynamic Range features, the Auto Lighting Optimization features, and the Highlight Tone Priority features of the 5D Mark III and was convinced they could make moot the high contrast / dark area noise issue. And they DO. So far I cannot create worrisome noise in the shadows of a brightly lit object on what is a rare sunny day in January here where I live.The FEEL of the camera is wonderful. Much like the feel of a 7D.I could have bought a D800, and indeed I will likely pick one up eventually (unless Obama-care spanks me as much as I fear it will), but for now my Canon lens collection (including a 300 - 2.8 L and an 85 - 1.2 L II) will continue to be put to good use on this fine tool

Before I bought the Mark 3, I had a Canon 40D but I dropped it. The Canon's repair center asked for $390-plus. I said forget about it. Not that I don't like the 40D. It's just that a 40D on Craigslist with fewer actuations sells for less. So I bit the bullet, I mean the wallet, and bought a used Mark 3 from Canon's Direct Store in March 2013 for $2,500 plus tax. As a semi-retired photojournalist my experience tells me only two criteria are important: How fast is the auto focus and how good is the low light performance. The Mark 3 receives a perfect 10. Digital camera is a little like automobile now. They give you all kinds of options that won't make you a better photographer, or driver. We all should have a camera like the Mark 3. However you should spend more time taking photos instead of playing around with customizations. Think of those great photographers 50 years ago who had none of these features. Folks, check out some of my samples photos here as well: [...]Ben Chan

Sure it's expensive, but the full frame and quality behind the camera make it worth every penny. I've taken mine to 25+ countries and hope to travel to even more. It's survived a dust storm in the African desert without any problems.

I originally had the Canon XT, then upgraded to the Canon 50D and now the Canon 5D Mark III. As all the reviewers have mentioned, this is simply a great camera. The most annoying factor in my previous camera(s) was the AF. No AF issues with this camera even in low light. The improved AF is the reason I chose it over the 5D Mark II.No significant noise even in minimal light and easily correctable in Lightroom.Silent mode is fantastic.Feels substantially more rugged than my 50D.I shoot mainly JPEG unless traveling or special events. This camera produces great jpegs. (RAW is still the best for IQ.)The menu settings were daunting at first, but these are the ones I use.Shoot I:Image quality JPEG LImage review: 2 secs.Beep: EnableRelease Shutter without card: OffLens Aberration correction: Enabled. you do have to load your lens profile manually.External Speedlight Control: Firing Enable,ETTLII Meter Evaluative,Flash sync in Av AUTO,Mirror Lockup OFF (will change if I need to)Shoot 2AEB 0ISO Speed Setting: Iso range 50-12800Auto ISO 100-12800Min Shutter speed: AutoALO: EnableColor space: Adoble RGBShoot 3Picture Style: Auto or FaithfulLong Exposure NR: OFF (will correct in LR)High ISO Speed NR: StandardHighlight Tone Priority: ON (unless it is sunny then OFF)Multiple Exposure: DisableHDR Mode EnableShoot 4: no preferenceAF 1Case 2AF 2AI Servo 1st Image PriorityAF3USM after One shot AF: ONAF-Assist Beam Firing: ONAF4Lens drive when AF Impossible: OFFSelectable AF points: Only Cross TypeAF area Select Mode: Click the first 4.AF area Selection Method: M-FnOrientation Linked AF: Same for horz. and vertic.AF5Manual AF point ...pattern: ContinuousAF point display during focus: SelectedVF display illumination: OnAF microadjustment: Currently off (but will enable it when Focal software can do it automatically.)Playback 3Highlight alert EnableAF point display EnablePlayback grid OFFHistogram disp: BrightnessMovie: no preferenceMagnification: Actual size (image is now at 100%)Setup 1Autorotate ONSetup 2Autopower off: 1 minuteC.Fn 1no changeC. Fn 2Warnings in viewfinder: NoneCustom controls DOF preview: one shot <-> AI servo This changes to single shot when I am in AI servo. Lens AF stop button: AF-OFF M-Fn: * Set: ISO Multicontroller dial: AF point direct selection. Main Dial: Tv Quick Dial: AvHope this helps.

We already have the Canon EOS 5D full frame camera and thought this would be a great step up and it is. Just wish some of the EF-S lens would fit it. It takes great pictures whether scenery, flowers, people, etc. We only use the L series lenses and with the combination of that and the camera the quality of the pictures cannot be beat. It was well worth the money we had to spend to buy it.

Unless you're going into the 1d world this is the premier Canon full-frame camera, and it completely meets my expectations in that regard. I need (and use) the autofocus performance that comes with this level of spending -- if you don't, the 6D has every bit the image quality but a much-nicer price. Either way you can't go wrong in the Canon line for a quality full-frame camera.

Awesome camera for stills, but I bought it for the video capabilities and it certainly delivers, If yoy need a single camera that does both, this is it.

I made the (huge) leap from the 40D to this 5DM3 and cannot believe how well this does, especially in Low-Light. I'm no longer afraid to crank up the ISO if I want a specific shutter/aperture combo.This camera, however, has made me realize how important good glass is, and that's where I've been spending my money lately. I got the KIT version of this camera (with the really good 24-105mm lens) and since then have added several primes as well as a 70-200 f2.8 MK2, which makes for an amazing combo with this camera.focus is fast, performance in low-light is phenomenal, and I couldn't be happier. I cannot imagine what Canon will do next to entice me to upgrade - I think I'll be happy for years with this thing!

Having owned the legendary Canon 5d MARK ii for more than 3.5 years, I finally decided to upgrade to this camera knowing the pros and cons discussed extensively on the web.Before I bought the camera, I actually got the chance to play with it as my friend had purchased one several months ago.I did some serious test, particularly on focusing, which I have a lot of complaint on the 5d2.Here are some subjective assessments:1) Low light focusing seems to have improved greatly on my 50 f/1.2 L, particularly on the side focal points.2) High ISO performance out of JPEG is "mind-blowing"--- although the raw photos improved only by 1/2 step; Picture quality does not really improve that much at low ISOs except that the high ISO images look stunning.3) The settings took some time to get adjusted to. But overall, I got most things figured out intuitively. The advanced settings are simply beautiful.4) The feel of the camera is nothing short of comforts.I have used the Nikon D800 and D7000 for a significant amount of time as well.My general suggestions are:If you can put up with the D800 focus issues complained by so many, you may want to consider that camera for landscape and studio shots. D800 has much better dynamic range (because of the Sony Sensor) and better low ISO performance.However, if you want to find an all around camera, 5d mark iii is probably the best choice other than some other more expensive options.I am very happy that I upgraded myself to this camera.I am looking forward to seeing Canon coming up with a high mega-pixel camera with better DR.

I am glad I bought this ibcredible camers. Superb photo qualities, just what you need! Kind of pricey Worth every dollar.