Отзывы о Объектив Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
170 отзывов пользователей o Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
Пользовались
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
- + фокусировка, легкий, простой, качество снимков
- - сложно сделать общий план - приходится бегать, итяжелый
- + За такую цену очень приятное качество картинки. Тихий. Хобот при наклоне не выезжает. Реально работающий стаб.
- - Недостатки ожидаемы - это дешевизна материалов, пластиковый байонет. Легкий (но это уже на вкус).
- + не шумит
- + Быстрый и цепкий автофокус, очень приятно с ним работать. Наконец выпустили достойный КИтовый объектив! Не вращается передняя линза, можно использовать полярик. Наличие стабилизатора частично компенсирует низкую светосилу.
- - Шустрый, легкий, бесшумный.
- + Отличный! Бесшумный в работе, очень быстрая фокусировка, лёгкий
- + Товар свой забрала,очень удобно делать заказ. Сайт простой в оформлении, зашла посмотрела, почитала характеристики,...
- + Объектив доставили целым и невридимым. Объектив новый, в рабочем состоянии.
- + Достаточно резкий.
Не большой вес и размер.
Быстрый автофокус, не рыщет туда сюда.
Хорошая стабилизация
Цена - качество...
Having picked up the 18-135mm STM lens I was quite happy with that, but this lens was quite a lot better than I expected it to be.
The previous "kit lens" was quite decent too, but this is improved in a number of ways over that version.
My quick fire pros and cons list:
Pros:
+ Improved build over the previous version. Better quality plastics used (feels better put together too) This isn't a classy feeling lens but it doesn't feel as hollow as many 18-55mm's do. Zoom action is smoother too
+ AF is fast and very quiet, new stepper motor is useful for video (you can't hear the AF at all on my 70d)
+ Very sharp, at all focal lenghts and apertures very usable, at the 18mm mark you only need to stop down slightly to tighten up the extreme edges. Very decent at the 55mm mark too
+ Excellent close up ability of 1:2.8 max mag, ok it's not a true macro but that's very good for an 18-55mm and might be enough for semi macro shooters
+ CA is mostly well controlled (better than the older version by far) but I did see more CA at the wider end
+ IS works very well around 3 to 3.5 stops from field use
+ 58mm filter is the normal common size, does not rotate with filters either
+ Full time MF with the new STM motor (unlike the older version)
+ 7 blade aperture ring quite decently smooth out of focus areas, but at 55mm f5.6 this isn't the lens for "bokeh" shots
Cons:
- Still has a plastic mount. Par for the course on 18-55mm lenses, but would be nice to have metal as the build is better v the older version
- Vignetting is present at the wider end from 18mm up to around 30mm worse at the 18mm end wide open. Take it down a stop or so to make it a non issue for most shooting
- STM motor is great for video, but as it's focus by wire (not mechanical focus) you don't get the feedback of a true mechanical manual focus lens. Not a huge deal but worth a mention. I have the same on my 18-135mm STM too
- Some distortion at the wide end fairly notable at the 18mm mark, this again is pretty much common for any of the 18-55mm lenses I've tried, once you move up the focal range it's no issue at all and can be corrected easily
I found the lens to work very well with the 70d I have with quick and quiet/accurate focus using both the viewfinder and the new phase detect AF off the sensor.
I do like the 18-135mm for it's very useful range, but was taken aback a bit just how sharp this lens is. It is a touch bigger than the older 18-55mm it replaces (maybe the new STM motor) but in every other way it's a better lens all around, optically sharper, improved build, though it does cost more than the older kit lens.
Compared to the Tamron 17-50 this lens isn't as well built, but holds up pretty well. I would say the Tamron does seem to have a bit more bite to the images, but it lacks IS...though the constant f2.8 is very useful to have. Personally I would look at this as a really good deal as a kit bundle (well worth getting), do think about your options though the 18-135mm costs more but covers a very nice range (135mm top end v 55mm is a big difference handy for portrait/candid shooting the longer focal length) the Sigma/Tamron offerings are also worth a look.
To date this is the best 18-55mm I've tried (used the Sony, Pentax, Nikon and previous Canon kit lenses), and by some margin too
If you're on a budget and this range covers your needs (ie landscapes/general shooting) really you will be very happy with the lens and you'll get some very sharp images from it.

This part is important given the reviews below. THIS WILL NOT FIT A STANDARD EOS DSLR. It is designed solely for the EOS M CSC and has a smaller mount. This lens is not made of plastic as many describe below and is not part of the EF-S series. Amazon is getting really bad for grouping reviews of similar items onto each other.
All in all, if you need something with a variable focal length if you picked up the 22mm bundle for the EOS m, this is worth a shot, but I would actually advise to get a standard EF kit lens and an adapter so if you ever upgrade to a full DSLR you have it. If you don't own an Eos-M do not buy.

These lenses are superb in every aspect - smooth, sharp, and silent - this last attribute being so important when taking video - no focusing noise or stabilising noise is picked up on the audio. BRILLIANT.
They are not built as solidly as the professionally L type lenses, but then they are a tiny fraction of the cost of one of those lenses.
Their ability to track a subject and to switch focus silently and almost instantaneously, is second to none.
I have no qualms in highly recommending this lens to any one (novice or experienced enthusiast) looking for other than a full blown professional L model ( at a price) which might get get a bit of rough treatment in the professional arena !
I have been so impressed that I have now also just purchased the EF-S 10-18mm IS STM.
Just to be clear, I'm not affiliated in any way to Canon but, having been an EOS user since the 300 film camera, these lenses take the photo experience to another level.
I hope my review is of help.


I would never get rid of this lens. Despite its modest price and appearance compared to its L red banded big brothers and sisters, it still has some distinct advantages. It's lighter. It's smaller. And despite being cheaper smaller and lighter its performance is often more than adequate. It's IS system is as good as any I have used. Its relatively low price means that if when it eventually goes wrong (and they all do eventually under the law of what moves a lot must wear out) you can afford to bin it and replace it with a newer version. Even if I didn't use it very often now, it would still be taken along as a lightweight backup.
Its not financial good sense for the camera industry to promote its cheaper lenses. The last thing they want is for a well known professional photographer to be seen using a kit lens. And despite Bert Hardy going out of his way to prove that the best photos can be taken with the cheapest equipment with his iconic Blackpool Railings photo, many amateurs still crave exotic lenses. Some people may criticise its distortion performance or edge definition, but quite frankly if I was doing work where these things were that important I would use a fixed focal length lens.
So, in short, don't underestimate this lens, and I speak as someone who has used and worked with some very expensive cameras and lenses in my time. It may look and feel like a cheap toy, but its performance is far from poor.

Construction and feel:
This is metal with metal bayonet. It feels solid, no rattles like some of their plastic kit lenses. Zoom movement is fluid and precise. Manual focus is smooth, although the manual focus ring is pretty small.
Image Quality:
Stunning, absolutely stunning. The photos are tack sharp, with good color and punchy contrast. Some falloff at the edges, but the camera compensates and corrects that. I can't say enough good about this lens, it's quickly become my GoTo lens and that's saying something, since I have a bag full of Canon L glass.
Compact, sharp, all metal, perfect.


(and that's while using the default Canon lense)...
It is not always easy to realize while you are on the move, but is very visible once you transfer to a computer.
I have countless holiday pictures plagued by that.
Disappointing.

Whereas the 22mm pancake lens is so good that it lets the sensor provide all the quality it offers, this lens holds back the sensor a bit.
And that's my only real gripe - it's just not as sharp as I'd like. Admittedly most of my shots have been toward the long end of the zoom and with smaller apertures for wide depth of field (on a tripod); maybe it does better at wider angles and with an aperture around f8-f13...







Took some really nice close up photos.
