Отзывы о Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 400
Где купить Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 400
| Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 черный | Яндекс Маркет | 11 900 ₽ 23 000 ₽ | Посмотреть |
| Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 400 черный | Яндекс Маркет | 12 095 ₽ | Посмотреть |
558 отзывов пользователей o Canon CanoScan LiDE 400
Пользовались
Canon CanoScan LiDE 400?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Астрономад-1XDYQ
08.09.2005
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
It works well,but I have been unable to perform the tasks that I purchased it for. Perhaps I have to use it more to get use to the proceedures. I beleive Cannon should have a more comprehensive guide book.
ТерраБот-5JHUO
23.10.2004
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I love the image quality on the scans. Scans of negatives are excellent (although I can't compare to a true film scanner). Scans of photos are great, too. Compared to the Epson 4180 I returned, image quality of negatives is MUCH better on the Canon.The software was easy to install on my Windows XP computer.However, I've had some annoyances with this scanner. I still give it 5 stars because image quality is my priority, and I don't do a high volume of scanning.* I had to return 2 scanners because of particles under the glass. If you look closely, you can see some "ferning" patterns and white dots near the top of the glass where the light rests (in the EXACT same place on both scanners!). Canon says they apply an anti-glare coating to the underside of the glass which may look foggy or hazy. I'm not sure what happened with my first 2 scanners, but the 3rd has no artifacts under the glass.* The cover for the film scanning light is a flimsy paper thing. As well, you cannot scan many negatives at once. If you scan a good quantity of film, this would be bad. For me, it's not much of an issue.* No driver for Macs.* So-so photo-editing software. Again not an issue for me since I already have great software.
НаноПилигрим-7DHVB
17.09.2004
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
The image quality is very, very good for a scanner of this price. The size is convenient, the use of USB 2 for power is convenient, the scanner looks good. It's fast at 300 dpi, slower at 600 dpi, and remarkably slow at 1200 dpi.Two issues, however. First: the box says max resolution of 2400 x 4800; the software shows a max resolution of only 1200 dpi. Yes, 99 times out of 100, 1200 dpi is plenty; but why market as 2400 dpi then? Second: with the exception of the included copy of Photoshop Elements 2.0 (a great deal), the software for OS X is horrible. The installer requires classic to run; and the installer is not necessarily successful in running. I downloaded an update to the drivers, and that was set to run in classic, even though it will only run in native OS X (not classic). I ended up having to install the CD, download the update, and copy the install script from the CD to the correct location in the update to get that installed, and then make an alias in one of the library folders. Compare this to the process for installing a digital camera: just plug it in. So while I'd recommend this as a nice home scanner for the price (don't expect the quality of a professional scanner), I'd also recommend that Canon do something about their installation software.
Спектр-7VLRW
25.04.2005
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've been nothing but satisfied with this scanner. My old Visioneer scanner broke, so I bought this one to replace it since I've always been a fan of Canon products (they last), and it seems to be the right choice. It's super compact, only runs off of one USB cable, and scans wonderfully. I use it for scanning in drawings and negatives for graphic design. And with the compact design, it would be easy to carry around with a laptop for scanning on the go. And at this price, it's a wonderful deal.
Сатурниан-1TXYT
29.09.2004
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I had much the same experience as Outis Nihil (below). The software package is apparently designed for OS 9. There is a separate OS X folder with installation drivers for each separate package, rather than the all-in-one installation driver for OS 9. In order to get the scanner to function under OS X, OS 9 installation is required, then you need to download the OS X driver upgrades from the Canon USA website. This allows direct scanning via Photoshop; I haven't tried anything else at the time of this writing. This is not revealed in their instructions, which are pretty much useless.Also, as mentioned, 1200 dpi is apparently the maximum scanning resolution, which makes their claim of 2400dpi not merely deceptive, but very simply a LIE. This claim needs to be retracted immediately from all their literature.The imaging results are very good and I'm happy with that. For that reason and the great price I've decided to keep the unit. Time will tell if the hardware is long lasting. The metal lid is a bit thin (admittedly contributing to the device's lightness and portability) but will easily be nicked, scratched, or dented over time with even moderate use.Hardware: B+, Software: D
Интеллектор-7XEEW
02.01.2005
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this scanner as a gift for my Mom who has boxes full of slides from her Dad, but didn't know what to do with them. I helped her set up the scanner and start scanning them, and the results are impressive. (We installed this on her AMD Duron 900 system with USB 1.1 ports. One day later, I installed a USB 2.0 card for her, and the scans are significantly faster.) We scanned negatives and slides and the results were excellent. The software works quite well, and the media autodetection works great. Mom pops two slides in, hits the scan button, and comes back a few moments later and pops two more in. The software crops the scan, drops it on the hard drive under My Pictures, and doesn't require any user intervention. I will probably buy one of these for myself once my old Canon CanoScan FB620U dies!
Спектр-8RAKG
06.03.2005
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this thing to convert some of my negatives to digital. First off you have to use a clumsy Fare 2.0 module which plugs into the scanner and fits on top of the negative into the 35mm film adapter. This is not a good idea becuase you can only do one negative frame at a time. Also it doesnt seem to push down on the negative to make it flat. Negative scans are horrible, its comparable to a 1-2 mega pixel digital image.Regular photo scans are not to shabby. The image detail seems good enough but the color accuracy is off. Only thing saving the color is Photoshop Elements.
Гелиос-4WMLI
20.05.2005
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
The Mac drivers for this scanner are faulty and unpredictable. Canon should be ashamed of this product, Do not buy this scanner if you have a Mac using OS X
ТехноНаблюдатель-1JENL
15.08.2004
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Scope of use and review: I use a scanner primarily for OCR and for capturing black and white photos.After several years of good service, my HP 6200C has turned into a nightmare: for some reason it began to require a 15-30 minute battle, after which it sometimes did scan -- and sometimes did not. So I bought an HP 3970, only to find another nightmare with the software: I took the HP 3970 back. In fact the HP 3970 was such a disappointment that I struggled to keep working with my HP 6200C for a few months, despite taking 15 minutes or more to get it to scan.I am extremely pleased with the Canon LiDE 80. It is fast and very easy to use. The OmniPage SE OCR software that comes with it does a very respectable job. And the scanner easily fits into my laptop bag for travel -- plus there are no power cords to haul along. The fact that it uses LED rather than a bulb also is a plus -- one less maintenance problem to worry about, one less thing to worry about in travel. I have already done more in a month with the LiDE than I was able to do with the HP 6200C in the last six months.
Кронос-9LCYC
19.03.2005
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Never had a product that claimed to be compatible with Mac that is SO incompatible that it's a joke. Don't waste your money on this if you're using OSX. It's a truly lousy piece of equipment, and the software is terrible. I'm giving mine away.
Астрономад-7RAQY
22.01.2005
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this scanner on sale for about $90 so I could scan negatives and film. Pros: It installed easily on my HP WinXP machine, it is satisfactory in speed, it scans negatives well, its small, and it does not require a separate power block. Cons: Its a bit noisy. I would not recommend it for the photo professional, buts its certainly a good amateur scanner and is also quite portable.
Астрон-5NDTT
01.11.2004
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Pros: Small and compact. Powered through USB. Does great with 35mm negatives.Cons: Poor scan quality.I bought this scanner along with the Epson 2480 to test. Although tedious with scanning 35mm film, the color and scan quality is great. But for scanning pictures and other items, the scan and weak, and the color washed out (greens come out too yellow, blues much lighter in comparison with the 2480 which I would give 5 stars for scan quality). There is also a horizontal banding in the scans which is very noticable when the image is printed.I would recommend this only if you wanted to scan film and didn't really care to have a high quality scan of anything else.
Лунатик-5PFXP
06.01.2005
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I recently bought this scanner. Its a great device. Small, light, produces good scans. The drivers and software provided for Mac OS X are pathetic. I have had many other Canon products before (printers & cameras) and they have always had good software. So, I am really astonished.This scanner is less than 10 days old and I am strongly considering returning it for one with better Mac OS X support.
Лунатик-1UUEJ
21.01.2005
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I was rather unimpressed with the cheap cardboard-like slip cover that you have to remove to scan in 35mm film strips. After 20 scans, the scanner stopped working. I emailed cannon support and after a few emails, they informed me that the scanner was defective. Wonderful. Next time, I'm getting an Epson.
НаноРейдер-6QEED
21.10.2004
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Good:This unit is an industrial design gemSpeed increase is very noticable over my older CanoScan N1220USoftware for Windows XP is decent (lots of options)Includes both TWAIN and WIA driversNo transformer block/AC cord to deal withBundled with USEFUL, quality software such as Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 and ScanSoft OmniPage SEBad:Scanning film negatives is a PAIN IN THE ASS (scanning one at a time and FORCING you to do a preview first - very tedious and time consuming)A bit louder than my older CanoScan N1220U during SOME processesOverall, scan quality is good and I think Canon put together a fantastic package.
Вояджер-3CONK
28.11.2004
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Just bought this scanner and tested it with text, photo, film, and slide. It did an amazingly good job on all. The bundled software worked great. OCR handled text great. Installation was super easy on XP pro machine (install software and hook up scanner -- ready to go!). No hassles. Looks great too. It's a low cost scanner (had been looking at a more expensive one but decided to save money). This scanner performs beyond my expectations.
Астероид-2NFQP
20.10.2004
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
For the money the Canon LiDE 80 is ideal for most users. The scanner will scan at 2400 dpi, but only in the mode the really matters, film (negative) and slide (positive) mode. The Canon LiDE 80 does this to prevent you from generating a large, and most of the time unnecessary file. For most users 300 to 600 dpi is all you need correctly digitize your image. If you want full control, you need to invest to the next level of scanners which will probably triple in price.
Синтрон-4GRKY
24.08.2004
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
When I bought it I didn't even know (or care) that the scanner could scan film but the other day I found some negatives at the back of a drawer and decided to try scanning them. I have to say I was quite impressed. Scanned at 2400 dpi, digital prints up to 5"x7" are almost indistiguishable from the photographic prints. I find that the images from scanned colour negatives have an overall bluish cast but this is easily corrected.I have found the scanner's small size and lack of a power cord to be a real advantage; it is handy to be able to tip the scanner on its side and store it out of the way when it is not in use.
Туманник-6KGOK
22.03.2004
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I have an iMac with OS 10.3.3 operating system. The scanner works well with the machine once you get through some start up difficulties. If you have programs that run in the classic mode, OS 9.2, then you must turn off the 9.2 system or the scanner will not work. Canon spells this out in the installation directions, but it is a bit of a chore as you have to open System Preferences click on OS 9 and stop OS 9. Then you can scan. As they point out, just hitting quit on the active program isn't enough. If you don't use any old programs, then there is no problem, but most of us do have them. As soon as you use one, OS 9 starts up automatically, and then you have to go through the stop procedure again if you wish to scan. Also, When I first try to print what I have scanned, I am told the printer is off line and I have to stop it, and then restart it to get the print. As you can see, Canon has a few program bugs they need to address. I emailed Canon to see if they have any fixes, but in two weeks they haven't bothered to answer.
Зета-Орион-3GZZR
02.03.2004
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I just purchased this scanner to replace a slow, unwieldy HP 5300C. After 1 week, here's what I think.===============================================================PROs:1. Slim form factor.2. Good quality photograph scans. Maybe not for a professional, but for us amateurs, it rocks!3. Very quick scanning4. Negative scannning possible with included adapter.5. Canoscan software definitely a cut above the norm6. Windows XP installation is fast and simple.-->a. Install Canoscan Drivers and software, reboot THEN-->b. plug scanner into nearest HighSpeed USB (USB 2.0) port-->c. You're good to go!7. Full Photoshop Elements 2.0 included================================================================CONs:1. A bit noisy2. Some software supplied as "SE" or limited versions3. Scanning Kodak APS film pictures can be tricky due to the nonstandard print sizes.================================================================A final piece of advice - make sure you acquire the latest Canon software from the Canon, USA website.
Нейрон-2IVYL
28.05.2004
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I have a Dell with only two USB ports. Using one for ethernet and the other for a Belkin 4 port USB hub for printer and digital camera. I was disappointed when I got the message that the LiDE 80 wouldn't work with a hub but had to be plugged directly into a USB port on the tower. I did not see any information about this in the product information I reviewed before I purchased the scanner. Now I must unplug the hub from the back of the tower and plug in the LiDE 80 before I can use it. A major inconvenience since the Dell tower is in a computer desk and has to be pulled out to reach the USB port.
Эксопилот-1DXXY
19.01.2004
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The Canoscan LiDE 80 is easy to use for a variety of applications and the USB Hi-Speed (no longer USB2) interface is super fast and convenient since it not only is the data link, but supplies power to the scanner. If your power hub is as congested as mine, you'll appreciate this bonus. The LiDE 80 comes standard with a film adapter unit so you can scan 35 mm film or unmounted slide film. although the literature claims the film scanner runs at 2400 x 4800 DPI, I don't buy it. My Nikon fim scanner is 2900 DPI and gives MUCH better scans of 35 mm film. No contest. Then again, it was quite a bit more (4X)expensive than the LiDE 80 and only scans film...The LiDE 80 includes software for automatic retouching of scratches and dust - and it also now has grain and fading correction. I tried these features on color photos taken over 50 years ago and was pleasantly surprised with the results. Overall, this is a nice package that goes well beyond the typical bargain scanner.
Квантум-5NGUF
27.06.2004
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Short and sweet I'm just a guy with a computer no fancy computer job no fancy education in computers. I read the manuals but they are not my cup of tea. This scanner took me about 2 days to really get the hang of it. Which was a short time compared to what most of this stuff takes for me. If your like me just go to cannon on your menu open canno scan tool box, click save and start there.
Гиперион-9QUNJ
14.05.2004
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I just bought this scanner for use with my G5 tower, and despite reading reviews to the contrary, it works brilliantly with OS X 10.3.4 - no problems whatsoever. I downloaded the latest CanoScan scanner driver (v7250) and CanoScan Toolbox (v4130) and within a few minutes of installing the software I was scanning with no problem at all. Scanner performs well considering its size, weight and one-cord convenience. This scanner should be ideal for all but the most demanding applications - highly recommended!
Показаны отзывы 505-528 из 558.
