Отзывы о Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 400
548 отзывов пользователей o Canon CanoScan LiDE 400
Пользовались
Canon CanoScan LiDE 400?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Небулоид-7KSLS
31.03.2006
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have only tried to scan documents and photos so far. The procedure seems slow but does a nice job with the finished product. I have not yet tried to scan film.
Сатурниан-5FOXA
13.03.2006
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This scanner is a wonder. Easy to use with idiot proof features. I love it - sorry I did not buy it sooner.
Зета-Орион-5WUCM
27.05.2005
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I have had this scanner for a couple of years and I loved it with my old Windows 98 computer and my Mac OS 9.0 laptop. Then I bought a Mac Mini with OS 10x. I have had compatibility nightmares ever since.I found out that it'll work with OS 10 IF and ONLY IF I install Adobe PhotoShop or Elements. Why should I have to spend $100 or more on software to get an $80 scanner to work? So, I got my laptop back out and started scanning and working on my graphics files on the laptop, where I have expensive programs that I cannot yet afford to replace. But in order to get an external CD Burner to work I had to upgrade to OS 9.1.Now, after just upgrading from Mac OS 9.0 to 9.1 I have to go through the whole process of troubleshooting again. I've already spent half a day in total frustration.This scanner should be off the market - without new drivers it's totally useless. It's more of a shame because I had liked it very much until a couple of months ago. There should be no reason for Canon and/or Mac to get appropriate drivers up and online.
МехаРейнджер-2QRGD
31.10.2005
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Don't buy this scanner if you are going to use it to scan b&w pages of text from text books. This scanner does an extremely poor job of a very basic function. The quality of the scans are terrible and the time required to get a preview of the scan on the screen is almost a minute! If you are trying to hold a text book open and flat against the bed that is way too long. This scanner doesn't compare with an old HP scanner that only scanned at 300 dpi!
Лунатик-7WVIZ
08.04.2005
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I am very happy with this scanner. It is actually a refreshing experience. I bought an hp about a year ago and it immediately crashed my computer.Since then I was wary of buying another scanner, but finally broke down and decided to try this one because I needed it for my freelance cartooning work and the price was right. I needed something to scan black ink lines (sometimes very thin or textured) accurately and smoothly. This little scanner did the trick. I've only had it for a couple months and it does what I need.The software is easy to use and the set up is simple.The scanning is a bit slow (waiting for it to warm up the light then scan), but I can certainly live with that seeing how much easier this thing has made my work.I've scanned color photos as well and it seemed to work with that too. Sometimes I use photos for different projects, but so far I havent scanned photos for serious work. So that is still somewhat untested. But for just scanning holiday snaps to email or whatever, it works just fine.Conclusion: So far so good! Best scanner I've had (and that includes another ridiculous and more expensive hp that I have at the office)...
Кварковец-9BYYH
27.02.2005
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Well, It looks like I'm going to be the disagreeable odd-ball person on this review page. I like this scanner. Mainly I like its size and weight. Thin-line is perfect for my desk and the scanner is quick and efficient. I use the advanced features for scanning, cropping the image rather than using the default of scanning the whole bed.I find the colors to be true when compared to the original photograph. If you scan at a high resolution with any scanner, you should be happier than anything of a low resolution. So, read the features and the implementation of them and you'll be happy, too. The Canoscan was the right price for what I needed. I wasn't into capturing slides, so that wasn't important to me. There were cheaper models, but I passed them up. There were more expensive models with features I didn't need.The bundled software comes with an OCR program which I've used repeatedly for scanning textbook pages. Another plus for the price.Because this scanner is so portable I can move it around and simply plug it in to the front USB connection on my PC whenever I have the need to use it.No problems with drivers, etc. I'm using Windows XP.Gail Gupton, Author: The 31-Day Diet of Spiritual Enlightenment and Seekers of Truth.
Вектрон-3TQFT
14.07.2005
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
An excellent scanner. Have had no trouble with the scanner or the software supplied with the unit. All of the software as well as drivers supplied on the bundled CDs have worked without problem with Windows XP. Already have a lot of time logged on the unit scanning magazine articles for storage on CD because I no longer have room for the magazines. Circuitry/software does a great job of automatically compensating for old magazines where yellowing of the paper has occurred. Somewhat unhappy that I cannot register the bundled PhotoStudio software to qualify for upgrades, whereas the other software supplied can be registered.
Нейрон-5ARAH
04.10.2005
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This scanner works very well, is very fast, and comes with pretty decent software.My one complaint: the claim of 3200dpi is misleading. 3200dpi scanning is ONLY available for FILM NEGATIVES; platen scanning maxes out at 1600dpi.
Интеллектор-1HEFO
22.12.2004
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I purchased the LiDE 80 from another vendor about a year ago. Worked fine for 11 months and then I started to get some relatively minor errors from the software. May have to do with upgrade to Windows XP SP2, I don't know.I called up the Canon Tech Support people (they are nice and very knowledgeable), and they told me to uninstall and then reinstall the scanner. Okay, fine. I do this for hardware all the time.However, ever since, I have been unable to reinstall the device, either with drivers from the OEM CD or from the Canon website. My operating system simply does not accept these drivers--when I install them, it is like nothing happened. The hardware installation wizard DOES NOT work for this scanner, presumably because the drivers are not "digitally signed" (translation--Canon didn't pay Microsoft a lot of money; that's okay with me as this would propagate into the price of the scanner, however it still needs to function properly to have any value).So basically I am stuck with a piece of equipment that is useless to me. My computer is a Dell that is only 6 months old--this should be able to work.In conclusion, the scanner is very nice when it works but the operating system is lousy...
ОмниКод-4BOBW
08.02.2005
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Although I love my Canon LiDE80 scanner, it will not scan 35mm slides, so I ordered a CanonScan 4200f. For documents, this scanner seems just as fast as the LiDE80--which is high praise. For film (35mm negatives or mounted slides), the scanning process is m---u---c---h slower, but effective nevertheless. The integrated film holder will take a 4-frame 35mm film strip or 2 mounted 35mm slides (even glass mounts!) and it's possible to scan all of the frames or slides in a single operation, though not in a single scanning pass.The 4200f is driven by one of Canon's typically excellent interface programs and this one offers PDF image scanning in addition to the typical options.Some reviewers have complained about the 4200f's "paper" or "paper-like" film scanner cover. These folks need some material recognition training: the cover in question is made of light, strong plastic, not paper. It seems very sturdy to me.I've docked this unit one star only because of its slow film scanning speed.
Альфа-Юнит-8JVKI
12.11.2004
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
SCANNER IS SLOW: Since it's a USB2.0 device, I didn't really think much about how long it would take to transfer an image to my computer. The answer is: A really long time. The scan itself happens quite quickly, but the actual transfer takes about 100 seconds per 3x5 photo at 300dpi.SUPPORT SUCKS: I thought something was wrong so I sent a note off to their email support. I explained that my USB port was functioning perfectly, but I got some stupid canned response back that, more than anything, demonstrated that they just didn't read the email. I replied asking for a more thorough readthru of my note and they simply never wrote back.SCANNING NEGATIVES IS DIFFICULT: I won't bore you with the details, but basically, somebody important left the room when they were designing the software for scanning negatives. The fundamentals are all there, but you're forced to preview each frame, even though the negative frame holder is held in a fixed area. It makes bulk scanning cumbersome for no reason. I've heard others complain about this little gaff.OVERALL: The image quality is good. If you're scanning the odd photo or negative, it's a good choice. If you want to scan a lots of images, this thing is just going to frustrate you to death.
Астрономад-1XDYQ
08.09.2005
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
It works well,but I have been unable to perform the tasks that I purchased it for. Perhaps I have to use it more to get use to the proceedures. I beleive Cannon should have a more comprehensive guide book.
ТерраБот-5JHUO
23.10.2004
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I love the image quality on the scans. Scans of negatives are excellent (although I can't compare to a true film scanner). Scans of photos are great, too. Compared to the Epson 4180 I returned, image quality of negatives is MUCH better on the Canon.The software was easy to install on my Windows XP computer.However, I've had some annoyances with this scanner. I still give it 5 stars because image quality is my priority, and I don't do a high volume of scanning.* I had to return 2 scanners because of particles under the glass. If you look closely, you can see some "ferning" patterns and white dots near the top of the glass where the light rests (in the EXACT same place on both scanners!). Canon says they apply an anti-glare coating to the underside of the glass which may look foggy or hazy. I'm not sure what happened with my first 2 scanners, but the 3rd has no artifacts under the glass.* The cover for the film scanning light is a flimsy paper thing. As well, you cannot scan many negatives at once. If you scan a good quantity of film, this would be bad. For me, it's not much of an issue.* No driver for Macs.* So-so photo-editing software. Again not an issue for me since I already have great software.
НаноПилигрим-7DHVB
17.09.2004
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
The image quality is very, very good for a scanner of this price. The size is convenient, the use of USB 2 for power is convenient, the scanner looks good. It's fast at 300 dpi, slower at 600 dpi, and remarkably slow at 1200 dpi.Two issues, however. First: the box says max resolution of 2400 x 4800; the software shows a max resolution of only 1200 dpi. Yes, 99 times out of 100, 1200 dpi is plenty; but why market as 2400 dpi then? Second: with the exception of the included copy of Photoshop Elements 2.0 (a great deal), the software for OS X is horrible. The installer requires classic to run; and the installer is not necessarily successful in running. I downloaded an update to the drivers, and that was set to run in classic, even though it will only run in native OS X (not classic). I ended up having to install the CD, download the update, and copy the install script from the CD to the correct location in the update to get that installed, and then make an alias in one of the library folders. Compare this to the process for installing a digital camera: just plug it in. So while I'd recommend this as a nice home scanner for the price (don't expect the quality of a professional scanner), I'd also recommend that Canon do something about their installation software.
Спектр-7VLRW
25.04.2005
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've been nothing but satisfied with this scanner. My old Visioneer scanner broke, so I bought this one to replace it since I've always been a fan of Canon products (they last), and it seems to be the right choice. It's super compact, only runs off of one USB cable, and scans wonderfully. I use it for scanning in drawings and negatives for graphic design. And with the compact design, it would be easy to carry around with a laptop for scanning on the go. And at this price, it's a wonderful deal.
Сатурниан-1TXYT
29.09.2004
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I had much the same experience as Outis Nihil (below). The software package is apparently designed for OS 9. There is a separate OS X folder with installation drivers for each separate package, rather than the all-in-one installation driver for OS 9. In order to get the scanner to function under OS X, OS 9 installation is required, then you need to download the OS X driver upgrades from the Canon USA website. This allows direct scanning via Photoshop; I haven't tried anything else at the time of this writing. This is not revealed in their instructions, which are pretty much useless.Also, as mentioned, 1200 dpi is apparently the maximum scanning resolution, which makes their claim of 2400dpi not merely deceptive, but very simply a LIE. This claim needs to be retracted immediately from all their literature.The imaging results are very good and I'm happy with that. For that reason and the great price I've decided to keep the unit. Time will tell if the hardware is long lasting. The metal lid is a bit thin (admittedly contributing to the device's lightness and portability) but will easily be nicked, scratched, or dented over time with even moderate use.Hardware: B+, Software: D
Интеллектор-7XEEW
02.01.2005
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this scanner as a gift for my Mom who has boxes full of slides from her Dad, but didn't know what to do with them. I helped her set up the scanner and start scanning them, and the results are impressive. (We installed this on her AMD Duron 900 system with USB 1.1 ports. One day later, I installed a USB 2.0 card for her, and the scans are significantly faster.) We scanned negatives and slides and the results were excellent. The software works quite well, and the media autodetection works great. Mom pops two slides in, hits the scan button, and comes back a few moments later and pops two more in. The software crops the scan, drops it on the hard drive under My Pictures, and doesn't require any user intervention. I will probably buy one of these for myself once my old Canon CanoScan FB620U dies!
Спектр-8RAKG
06.03.2005
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this thing to convert some of my negatives to digital. First off you have to use a clumsy Fare 2.0 module which plugs into the scanner and fits on top of the negative into the 35mm film adapter. This is not a good idea becuase you can only do one negative frame at a time. Also it doesnt seem to push down on the negative to make it flat. Negative scans are horrible, its comparable to a 1-2 mega pixel digital image.Regular photo scans are not to shabby. The image detail seems good enough but the color accuracy is off. Only thing saving the color is Photoshop Elements.
Гелиос-4WMLI
20.05.2005
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
The Mac drivers for this scanner are faulty and unpredictable. Canon should be ashamed of this product, Do not buy this scanner if you have a Mac using OS X
ТехноНаблюдатель-1JENL
15.08.2004
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Scope of use and review: I use a scanner primarily for OCR and for capturing black and white photos.After several years of good service, my HP 6200C has turned into a nightmare: for some reason it began to require a 15-30 minute battle, after which it sometimes did scan -- and sometimes did not. So I bought an HP 3970, only to find another nightmare with the software: I took the HP 3970 back. In fact the HP 3970 was such a disappointment that I struggled to keep working with my HP 6200C for a few months, despite taking 15 minutes or more to get it to scan.I am extremely pleased with the Canon LiDE 80. It is fast and very easy to use. The OmniPage SE OCR software that comes with it does a very respectable job. And the scanner easily fits into my laptop bag for travel -- plus there are no power cords to haul along. The fact that it uses LED rather than a bulb also is a plus -- one less maintenance problem to worry about, one less thing to worry about in travel. I have already done more in a month with the LiDE than I was able to do with the HP 6200C in the last six months.
Кронос-9LCYC
19.03.2005
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Never had a product that claimed to be compatible with Mac that is SO incompatible that it's a joke. Don't waste your money on this if you're using OSX. It's a truly lousy piece of equipment, and the software is terrible. I'm giving mine away.
Астрономад-7RAQY
22.01.2005
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this scanner on sale for about $90 so I could scan negatives and film. Pros: It installed easily on my HP WinXP machine, it is satisfactory in speed, it scans negatives well, its small, and it does not require a separate power block. Cons: Its a bit noisy. I would not recommend it for the photo professional, buts its certainly a good amateur scanner and is also quite portable.
Астрон-5NDTT
01.11.2004
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Pros: Small and compact. Powered through USB. Does great with 35mm negatives.Cons: Poor scan quality.I bought this scanner along with the Epson 2480 to test. Although tedious with scanning 35mm film, the color and scan quality is great. But for scanning pictures and other items, the scan and weak, and the color washed out (greens come out too yellow, blues much lighter in comparison with the 2480 which I would give 5 stars for scan quality). There is also a horizontal banding in the scans which is very noticable when the image is printed.I would recommend this only if you wanted to scan film and didn't really care to have a high quality scan of anything else.
Лунатик-5PFXP
06.01.2005
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I recently bought this scanner. Its a great device. Small, light, produces good scans. The drivers and software provided for Mac OS X are pathetic. I have had many other Canon products before (printers & cameras) and they have always had good software. So, I am really astonished.This scanner is less than 10 days old and I am strongly considering returning it for one with better Mac OS X support.
Показаны отзывы 409-432 из 548.
