Отзывы о Жесткий диск Western Digital WD Red Plus 1 ТБ WD10EFRX
623 отзывов пользователей о Western Digital WD Red Plus 1 ТБ WD10EFRX
Пользовались
Western Digital WD Red Plus 1 ТБ WD10EFRX?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Кварковец-9QWMH
13.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Один из лучших, за 3000тр.
Сириус-4XDSF
13.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Качество, цена.
Гравитон-1FAGO
13.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Просто кину результаты тестов, чтоб могли сравнивать со своими винтами
Астрон-9BYVR
20.08.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Here is a quote from a review at pcper.comI'm going to let the cat out of the bag right here and now. Everyone's home RAID is likely an accident waiting to happen. If you're using regular consumer drives in a large array, there are some very simple (and likely) scenarios that can cause it to completely fail. I'm guilty of operating under this same false hope - I have an 8-drive array of 3TB WD Caviar Greens in a RAID-5. For those uninitiated, RAID-5 is where one drive worth of capacity is volunteered for use as parity data, which is distributed amongst all drives in the array. This trick allows for no data loss in the case where a single drive fails. The RAID controller can simply figure out the missing data by running the extra parity through the same formula that created it. This is called redundancy, but I propose that it's not.Since I'm also guilty here with my huge array of Caviar Greens, let me also say that every few weeks I have a batch job that reads *all* data from that array. Why on earth would I need to occasionally and repeatedly read 21TB of data from something that should already be super reliable? Here's the failure scenario for what might happen to me if I didn't: * Array starts off operating as normal, but drive 3 has a bad sector that cropped up a few months back. This has gone unnoticed because the bad sector was part of a rarely accessed file. * During operation, drive 1 encounters a new bad sector. * Since drive 1 is a consumer drive it goes into a retry loop, repeatedly attempting to read and correct the bad sector. * The RAID controller exceeds its timeout threshold waiting on drive 1 and marks it offline. * Array is now in degraded status with drive 1 marked as failed. * User replaces drive 1. RAID controller initiates rebuild using parity data from the other drives. * During rebuild, RAID controller encounters the bad sector on drive 3. * Since drive 3 is a consumer drive it goes into a retry loop, repeatedly attempting to read and correct the bad sector. * The RAID controller exceeds its timeout threshold waiting on drive 3 and marks it offline. * Rebuild fails.At this point the way forward varies from controller to controller, but the long and short of it is that the data is at extreme risk of loss. There are ways to get it all back (most likely without that one bad sector on drive 3), but none of them are particularly easy. Now you may be asking yourself how enterprises run huge RAIDs and don't see this sort of problem? The answer is Time Limited Error Recovery - where the hard drive assumes it is part of an array, assumes there is redundancy, and is not afraid to quickly tell the host controller that it just can't complete the current I/O request.Here's how that scenario would have played out if the drives implemented some form of TLER: * Array starts off operating as normal, but drive 3 has developed a bad sector several weeks ago. This went unnoticed because the bad sector was part of a rarely accessed file. * During operation, drive 1 encounters a new bad sector. * Drive 1 makes a few read attempts and then reports a CRC error to the RAID controller. * The RAID controller maps out the bad sector, locating it elsewhere on the drive. The missing sector is rebuilt using parity data from the other drives in the array. *Array continues normal operation, with the error added to its event log.The above scenario is what would play out with an Areca RAID controller (I've verified this personally). Other controllers may behave differently. A controller unable to do a bad sector remap might have just marked drive 1 as bad, but the key is that the rebuild would be much less likely to fail as drive 3 would not drop completely offline once the controller ran into the additional bad sector. The moral of this story is that typical consumer grade drives have data error timeouts that are far longer than the drive offline timeout of typical RAID controllers, and without some form of TLER, two bad sectors (totaling 1024 bytes) is all that's required to put multiple terabytes of data in grave danger.The Solution:The solution should be simple - just get some drives with TLER. The problem is that until now those were prohibitively expensive. Enterprise drives have all sorts of added features like accelerometers and pressure sensors to compensate for sliding in and out of a server rack while operating, as well as dealing with rapid pressure changes that take place when the server room door opens and the forced air circulation takes a quick detour. Those features just aren't needed in that home NAS sitting on your bookshelf. What *is* needed is a WD Caviar Green that has TLER, and Western Digital delivers that in their new Red drives.End quote and back to reviewer.I've got 5 of these in a Synology DiskStation 5-Bay (Diskless) Network Attached Storage (DS1512+). It is really a sweet setup.The Synology software has a S.M.A.R.T. test that can do surface scans to detect bad sectors. I have their Quick T
ИнфраГость-6HUPU
29.11.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
If you're looking at this review, you're probably in the market for some honkin' big drives to stuff into a server or a NAS box. These Western Digital "Red" series drives are probably a total waste of money if you're planning to put them into a regular PC. If you're not doing a raid array of some kind, then save your money and buy the green or black series drives instead. If you're looking to set up a raid array of some sort, these are a bargain. They aren't the fastest drives, but they are rated to run 24x7 serving up data! Their 3 year warranty is above the current industry standard for consumer hard drives.For my home-made FreeNAS (google it!) NAS/Server, I bought 5 WD Red drives from Adorama (purchased through Amazon) and 1 drive directly from Amazon.The one drive from Amazon came very well packaged, double boxed in what looks like a WD cardboard box with a shock absorbing cradle. Very well packaged for shipment. Honestly, Amazon has been stellar for packaging boxes for shipment.The 5 hard drives from Adorama came in a big box which 'clunked' when it was tilted. Opening the box revealed some big plastic pillow air strips, and 5 loose smaller boxes. Inside each of the smaller boxes was a few pillows and a factory bagged hard drive. There were not enough pillows in each box to securely cushion the hard drives against rattling around, so there's a high likelihood of damage in shipment. BAD SHIPPERS! NO DONUT!Anyway, getting on to the performance of the drives... I'm running 6 drives in a ZFS RaidZ2 array. They are all controlled using an IBM M1015 PCIE 8x SATA 3 controller which has been flashed to be an HBA providing JBOD to the ZFS OS. That's a lotta acronyms! The speed of the array is quite fast... more than fast enough to saturate a gigabit network. I currently have about 5TB of data stored on the 10TB array.On to the bad stuff...One of the drives (I haven't checked the serial number to see which shipper it came from) is starting to give signs of premature failure after about 70 hours of operation. During a scrub of the data pool, drive DA5 is experiencing unreadable sectors. Luckily ZFS is able to calculate the correct values for the corrupted data, and is busily recreating the data onto another part of the drive. ZFS rocks for data reliability! If the drive does turn out to be bad, I have a WD Green 3TB drive that I can put into the array as a hot swap temporarily until the failed drive can be replaced. *UPDATE* The ZFS scrub just finished, and it repaired 1.53MB of data, with no data loss. Did I mention that ZFS rocks?Warning/Advice about Data Storage: Note 1: If you're going to be using these drives, or any data storage device for that matter, make sure that you take into account that these are highly fragile and delicate devices which can be easily damaged in shipment, or just plain up and fail when you least expect it. You really need to use some sort of redundant array of drives so that if one drive fails, your data doesn't vanish. In my case, the final configuration is going to be 6 drives in a RaidZ2 (dual parity striping), which means that my data stays intact and accessible even if 2 drives fail simultaneously. Also, there is going to be a 3TB Green drive as a hot spare that can take over for any failed drive in the array. With the hot-spare, my data can survive the loss of 3 drives without losing data (as long as the failures don't happen all at the same time). Note 2: Always, always, always have a backup. In my case, I have two external 3TB USB3.0 drives which will be used only for backup purposes. Every so often, I'll backup the critical data onto the drives and stash them in my locker at work. If you don't have TrueCrypt, google it and see why your backup removable drives should be using it. If someone steals the drives, they only get the drives and not my data.I'm giving 5 stars for the drives that work... 1 star for the failing drive... averages to about 4 stars score! I'll update this review once I have details on how the drives do in a week or so. Currently it ain't looking too good for drive DA5!
Дроид-4SBYR
18.08.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
After about six months of searching for the perfect drive, I finally settled on two of these Western Digital Red 2TB WD20EFRX hard drives. I was ready to purchase HGST enterprise drives, the former Hitachi, but WD came out with these drives just in-time. I wanted to get the 3TB WD30EFRX version for my Synology DS212 NAS, but the price difference didn't make that much of a sense, and 2TB drives are more than enough for a few years of my home office use. I am very happy that these drives MTBFs are rated at 1,000,000 hours, they use less power, and they are cheaper than other enterprise drives.Upon receiving, I immediately installed them in my NAS. It took about 15 minutes to install DSM 4 and begin the inspection process. I neither chose Raid 1, JBOD, or SHR, and I took some online advice and created two separate volumes, one on each disk, to have two independent file systems. In this case, you don't have to worry about rebuilding disk arrays if any drives fail, and you always have a backup present. I was planning on using Folder Sync feature to sync all folders from Disk 1 to Disk 2 every other hour, but I found out this feature only works on two independent Synology Disk Stations; however, you can use automated backup feature to backup data from Disk 1 into Disk 2, and it produces about the same result as Folder Sync does, and it gives you a few more options for backing up system and application files as well.Synology volume creation took about 7 hours for each drive with automatic bad sector reallocation feature. I later tested each drive with S.M.A.R.T extended test--each took about 4 hours--and I am happy to report that I did not have any bad sectors on either of the drives. That is, the "Reallocated Sector Count" reads zero in S.M.A.R.T report.The drives are surprisingly quiet. I had an enterprise RE2 500GB in my NAS, and it was thunderstorm loud compared to these. The temperature is also very reasonable. When the drive is resting it is about 31C/88F, and under heavy usage it rises up to 35C/95F. Although these drives speed are only 5000 rpm, I don't see any difference in file transfer speed. The only downside that I could sense was the startup time from sleep. I feel that compared to my old WD RE2 drive, it takes a good 2 to 5 seconds more for the NAS to come out of sleep each time. Not a deal breaker, but something to consider when you invest in these drives.I think WD has done a good job with these drives, and they are currently the best on the market for home or home office use. That being said, I still think WD RE4 drives are the best enterprise drives and ultimate in performance; however, if you are looking for a good set of drives for your NAS, and the power consumption and noise are important to you, these WD Red drives will work just fine. Compared to desktop drives, these come with a few enterprise features that come in handy and will save you some time and money down the road.
Астрон-3DXUR
05.01.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this WD Red drive to provide backup for my large (data) desktop. I use Windows backup. I paired the drive with a StarTech USB 3.0 enclosure and a Koutech USB 3.0 PCI card (each of which worked fine. I can't say enough positive things about Koutech support, BTW). Tested it for reads and writes: very fast. Then I tried to run backup, and Windows backup failed. Without belaboring the many phone calls and hours of research on the web, the problem is a combination of Microsoft Win 7 inability to handle 4K logical & physical sectors with WD's failure to provide microcode to emulate 512e sectors for this drive. (NB: Windows 8 does support 4K sectors). After a number of emails back and forth - over several weeks - I finally wound up with WD level 2 support who informed me that the drive was intended as an "internal drive" with the implication that I was unreasonable to try to use it as an external drive. Of course, WD markets this as a (and has an approved enclosure list for) NAS drive when it's connected via ethernet. When I queried what a NAS drive was if not an external drive, I was told that it was the USB attachment that created the problem. BTW, level 1 tried to blame the enclosure first, then the USB card, then my motherboard... anybody but them.The good news is that the drive is fast attached as I have it via USB 3.0 and if there were not a specific problem with Microsoft Windows Backup (or some other critical application), it would be fine. The real problem is the marketing language and lack of cautions from WD about a well-known and well-documented problem.(If you want more detail search for "Windows 7 Backup error 0x8078002A" or "4k sectors and windows backup.") Despite what you may read about potential solutions, the WD Quick Formatter cannot find WD Red drives when USB attached. Further, Level 2 WD support assures me that there is no microcode in the WD Red drives which can be used to emulate 512 sectors, so there is no solution.As for now, I have switched backup programs, hardly my favored workaround. But it took so long for WD to get back to me and finally give me a definitive answer that my 30 day window to return the drive passed.As long as you are dealing with applications which are not sensitive to 4K vs 512 sectors, the drive is fine. If there is a dependency, pass it by.
Капеллан-3XGBS
24.03.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Between music, movies, pictures and games our pcs fill fast. Instead of always buying a new machine every 3 or 4 years I've been updating my computer with the latest peripherals and so far so good, until now. I purchased one of the largest drives I could find, unfortunately a 3 terabyte drive only showed as 746 gigabytes on my Windows 7, 32-bit computer. No matter how much I tried formatting with several third-party programs and many hours on line reading Tech Guru suggestions nothing worked or made my computer read the drive's true capacity.I don't want to be unfair about the drive, it seems to be very good (thus the 3 stars), but not everyone who buys a larger hard drive has the newest machine and like me, just needed some extra space on a not so old machine. But there's really no fix out there that works and there should be included at least an install disk that might fix things and set the drive up properly. The drive comes with no software and Western Digital's site is a waste of time to find answers, as you're pretty much just reading a forum of others having the same problem.Is it the motherboard, the way it's formatted, the bios or the operating system? No one seems to know, they only guess at solutions, yet are well aware of the problem and what causes it. No third party program worked for me; some I paid for, others I downloaded free trials, all for naught.I even disconnected my original hard drive and an extra 1.5 terabyte drive I bought only a few years ago and plugged in only the new drive, re-loaded Windows, but still only 746GB showed. Finally enough was enough and it's being returned. Also be aware that there seems to be no such thing as a Sata Data Y cable so make sure you have an extra port on your motherboard to accommodate the drive.I'm not saying everyone will have problems, it just didn't work for me and less than a 3rd capacity drive just doesn't cut it if you're trying to expand your system.
НоваГость-6CFTO
17.08.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Earlier this year, I took a chance purchasing Seagate's new 3TB HD for media storage and it died 2 months later. Since then I've purchased a 3TB Western Digital "RED" drive (I would have picked the WD "BLACK", but the price difference was a deal breaker). It's not in a NAS (just in PC), and with only one month in service I can say that at this point I'm pleased with the drive and it's performance. It's not as noisy, and certainly runs cooler than the dead Seagate, but time will tell.UPDATE: 10-14-12I didn't wait for the six month period to bump it to 5-star status. I didn't mention it before but the dead Seagate was in a USB external housing which is what I put this in. I almost never hear it, and while I haven't been as scientific as some (holding a stop watch, etc.)I have moved many large files to/from it, and then to two other external drives (same file each time) and the "RED" is by far the fastest, making things less time consuming. The others leave me toe-tapping or playing solitare until the transfers are complete. I bought a 2TB, not too long ago and plan to get 2 more 3TB drives before the end of the year. Yes, the RED series has a 3-year limited warranty.UPDATE: 11-17-12The 3TB RED and my 3, 2TB RED's are still very happy campers, on a 24/7 basis. I recently built a PC for a customer and put the 1TB RED in it (about 3 weeks ago) and they are very happy with the build, and the first comment I received was "It's so quiet". Our distributor tried to sway us from using these in anything other than a NAS, remarking that they were too slow, so I did some digging around various tech sites and came up with additional info:Due to it's variable speed, Western Digital upped the MTBF from 650,000 hours to 1,000,0003 year warranty with dedicated 24/7 supportWD doesn't state the actual spin-speed, merely saying it's Intellipower (meaning less than 7,200rpm), and from what I've seen most put it in the 5400 to 5900 RPM range.The Drive's cache memory was upgraded from DDR to DDR2In a test pitting RED against other brand hard drives which run at 7200 RPM, it came out in the middle of the pack on random data tranfers, however, when transferring large media files (in the 20+ GB range) the RED beat the Seagate Barracuda by 2 minutes.UPDATE 12/31/12No problems, runs cool, streams media great. The same goes for the 2- 2TB "RED" label drives in use.UPDATE 02/26/138 months of 24/7 and still going strong (3TB), 6 months of 24/7 and still going strong (2TB). So far, everyone I've recommended these drives to (and bought them) are also "Happy Campers".
МехаРейнджер-1UZHW
29.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I will try to keep this short. I have owned over 10 Western Digital hard-drives and I have only ever had one go bad on me, but it was in a very hot slim height PC and that was 5 years ago. These drives have continued the Western Digital legacy (at least for me, maybe I am lucky).I own 4 of the WD Red 2 TB Hard Drives. 2 of the drives I bought here on Amazon, 2 of the drives I bought a week later on the Egg Site...Amazon had decent packaging, Egg had probably more packaging than was needed (and that is never a bad thing when it comes to hard-drives)I installed the first 2 drives, absolutely no problems. I immediately ran long hard drive tests using Seagate Seatools. 5 hours later and the drives are completely fine. I am using these to store large 1080p movie files (18GB's a piece usually). I use one drive to mirror the other using a program called Synchronicity. This is for the simplest (and in my opinion best) form of redundancy.I ran the long harddrive tests every 2 days for the next 6 days and the 2 drives passed completely fine on both of them (they were both nearly full from consolidating my movie collection to these drives).I bought 2 more of these drives on Egg when they were on sale and I had the exact same experience as before, they are perfect.I now have a total of 8TB of storage from these drives. (4TB for storing files, and 4TB for redundancy).Pros:Good value depending on when you buy (I got first batch for $106.99 a piece and the second batch for $99 a piece) I wouldn't pay over $120 for these.Reliable (I have had these for about a month and have ran many long drive tests and have had no errors so far. I will continue to do so and update this review)Cons:I don't have any thing bad to say about these drives.Other Advice:If you receive a drive that wasn't packaged well THEN RETURN IT.You can only blame yourself if you use and don't return a drive that is packaged incorrectly, and then the drive goes bad.
Супернова-0CDSZ
29.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
We bought two WD 3TB Reds to go in a Synology DS213 NAS. The drive installed as drive one in a modified Raid 1 array that Synology calls "SHR" has been fine in the month or more it's been running. The second drive crashed after a week. I elected to return it to Western Digital for replacement under their "Advance Replacement" program, whereby they ship the new drive, and one simply returns the defective drive in that packaging. There are several kickers. One is that they put a hold on a credit card until they get the old drive returned, and it's for $250- much more than the going price on Amazon, so be sure to return it within the 30 days given. The other caveat is that shipping the old drive back is on you. That will currently run $15 insured to return the drive UPS.Anyhow, I promptly received the replacement drive, installed it (this is extremely easy in the Synology NAS), and lo and behold, although it ran normally it would not pass the extended S.M.A.R.T. test. I notified WD, and they asked if I wanted to replace it. I stated that I did not if it meant I was going to have to pay for shipping a second time. They sent me a new drive (that had been pre-tested) plus a prepaid return shipping label. This new drive is installed and running fine.The WD Red series is designed to run in NAS applications, and presumably it does. I give the highest marks here to Western Digital for how the problem I had was handled. All manufactured products have a certain number of defective units, nobody can do anything about that. The real test of a manufacturer is how they deal with such issues, and that went very well in my case.
Альфа-Юнит-2FIHH
21.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I just got a couple of these 3TB WD Red drives a week ago! If you want some nice drives for your NAS these are it! Recommended for 1 to 5 drive bay systems. My new NAS has 4 bays so I'm using 2 of them right now. Formatted you get 2.7TB from them! You want a HDD that is guaranteed to support a NAS, these WD Red drive are them!!!The are Basically Green drives and yet so much more! They are much faster yet use less Power then other drives and have less heat. They also have a 3 year warranty and their own phone number to call if you have any problems. So the little higher price is worth the longer warranty of these over the other drives. These have software designed to work in a NAS environment that other HDD can have issues with!NAS's are a fast growing market right now I think. Since they need Hard Drives, I'm surprised WD is the only ones out with these RED NAS drives. I'm sure others are working on their own versions for this growing market. If you want to sell HDD's, especially the 3.5" ones, because Laptops and whatnot is the growing market and they take 2.5" drives or going with SSD drives.Both of my drives worked problem free. Just mounted to the frames and popped them into my NAS and the NAS did the rest on it's own. Simple easy!!! Lower power saves you money in electricity over the years using it and less heat means longer lasting drives! How can you go wrong?So how do these really stack up in Comparison to other HDD? Well when it comes to Hardware Reviews everyone knows anandtech.com right! Check it out.[...]Toms Hardware is also another great review site. Check out their review of these Red drives![...]
Пандорец-0AJXB
08.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have installed 35 of these as of this review.Out of the 35 I haven't had a single DOA Drive or one fail yet. The Oldest is now about 6 months old and I have no bad sectors or other issues with the drive...I utilize them as Storage drives in Media Center PCs and they are low enough power that you can put multiple drives in a relatively low power setup without taxing your power supply. These are not completely silent drives but even under heavy read/write loads they are barely audible in an HTPC case.If you are looking for a 24/7 rated Hard Drive (If you are using a NAS system or an HTPC you absolutely are) This is a great choice, cheaper but just as reliable as the enterprise and black level drives but much cheaper overall.They are a great addition to any Media PC and I would recommend them to add a significant amount of storage at decent cost.I've been racking my brain to find a con, but honestly Price is the only remotely down side I can find, and that's not really bad considering it's half the cost of enterprise drives...I would recommend these Drives for any storage application, get rid of the consumer level drives and get these, they are basically enterprise quality at near consumer prices...Just my thoughts.
КиберНаблюдатель-8CTIO
21.09.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I've been quite happy with these drives, so far, in a Synology DiskStation 5-Bay (Diskless) Network Attached Storage (DS1512+) . As the review for this item from Gary E. Peterson (referencing a review from pcper.com) says, regular consumer grade drives in RAID are an accident waiting to happen. Much less so with these drives, which are designed specifically for use in home NAS (specifically, TLER and the fact that they are designed to be on 24/7...). Now, as far as quality control is concerned, of the 3 drives I ordered, 1 of the three threw some S.M.A.R.T. test errors, so I RMA'ed the drive; the other two, and the replacement have all had no problems. I get adequate speed from the drives (I'm seeing transfer speeds of 500-640 or so mbps over gigabit ethernet) in a raid 5 (shr) setup on the Synology. It's a sweet setup, and someday I'll probably add two more of these drives...A brand new drive throwing errors, and hence needing replacement, makes me knock the review down to 4/5 stars.As a side note, my purchasing experience (in August 2012) wasn't the best for this product (WD30EFRX); it seems that it's been pretty hard for reputable sellers to keep sufficient stock of this drive (1 of the 3 drives I ended with is from Amazon Prime, but the others were from Amazon marketplace sellers). Some Amazon marketplace sellers (in my case ANTonline) were perfectly willing to call an item "In Stock" when they apparently only thought that they could get them in time to make their estimated shipping time. This is unacceptable, and this cost me time (waiting 5 days for the order to be shipped) during which a different reputable seller may have actually delivered the product had I ordered it during this time... Eventually, the Amazon seller MWave (3 drives, one of which was bad) and Amazon prime (for the final drive) came through for me.
Вояджер-2BDIR
18.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought these disks, even though they are officially only recommended for smaller NAS enclosures (up to 5 disks, if I am not mistaken). even though these disks were about 5-10% more expensive than the slightly faster rated Barracudas.As speed was not my top selection criterion, I was willing to be flexible, in favor of quiet operations, and a more NAS aware behaviour of the disks. Well... In terms of speed... These 8 disks are running 10 inches from my ear, and while I do hear car doors close at the other end of the street, I don't hear these disks, even when running at operational speeds.Moreover these disks (as opposed to the Barracudas) have a variable spindle speed, which means that they can idle down when the NAS detects no activity is needed.BUT... I must say, even the speed amazes me. I do uncompressed non-linear video editing, and the rendering speed of the effects is near instantaneous, offering me all the speed I could ever need.These disks are amazing thus far, and if the reliability keeps up, I would be a repeat buyer anytime, that is, until pricing of nearline disks would come to within 15% of them.I would recommend these disks to anyone looking for NAS optimized disks with great performance and reliability, and quiet operation and idle noise levels.
Вектрон-2TBYQ
05.12.2012
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I have it installed in a server tower, with a mix of other drives to include WD Green drives. The Red drive performs as well as any other drive and the drive temperature is lower than surrounding drives, which was one reason I purchased this drive.So far, so good. As I slowly upgrade or replace my current drives with Red drives I will try and come back and report again.UPDATED: 7 JAN 2013Failed! WHS said it was missing, I took out the drive. Re-installed, tried another cable/power connector, took it out and plugged it into a win 7 box, files came up for a moment then dropped. Drive is sort of seen in drive manager but states that it is not ready. Ran Spinrite 6.0, couldn't see it.Downloaded WD Data Lifeguard Diagnostic for Windows, it stated that it failed due too to many bad sectors detected. I have been a long, long time shopper of WD drives and their media boxes. I was very surprised that it failed and so soon too, since these Red drives are supposed to be tougher, longer lasting, quieter, and cooler than the 5 green drives I have had for years. Not so sure about that...So I will be trying to recover any data I can for a bit but more than likely it is gone, had about half the drive duped using stablebit butnot sure which files...I guess I will find out soon.I am not saying stay away from WD, this is the first drive that I have had fail as far back as I can remember. Even so, every company makes mistakes, I will give them the benefit of the doubt but we will see how customer support works out.
МехаРейнджер-9VYSH
09.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
WD Red 3 TB NAS Hard Drive: 3.5 Inch, SATA III, 64 MB Cache - WD30EFRXThis Drive is awesome with error correction runs a cool 95-110 Degrees F. Also has twice the life hours of the WD Green that just a short time ago was the best on the market for the price.. Now WD Red for the price and Life, this by far is your best investmentif you have stuff on your computer you really care about.. The Error Correction alone was the Part that I care'd about the most.. I do not USE NAS or RAID .. they say in reviews if you do not use a NAS or RAID, this drive is not worth the extra money! I have to Disagree Strongly here. If you have Data On your Computer that you cannot lose and you cannot spend the big ($) Money for the Solid State Drives (Besides they are still much too small still). This is your Best drive on the market today :)CrystalDiskInfoIt is Very Important to know your Hard Drive's Health on your computer at all times. If you did not know that this can be done.. The Free Software Link I provided is Still "The Best" software out today..Yes it is freeware... Enjoy
Квазар-9IHKK
24.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I don't know much about the technicals of hard drives. Yet, I guess at the end of the day as long as they are working and not making much noise that is all I need to know.I placed two of these 'Red' drives in a Synology DS-212j NAS as basically a RAID 1 setup. The Synology recognized them without a problem.Synology's DSM 4.1 software has some aggressive power management schemes and it seems these drives take greater advantage of those schemes than other drives. When both drives are in operation I am seeing about ~22 to ~23 watts of electrical usage from the wall outlet. When they go into deep hibernation mode the unit get down to ~8 to 9~ watts.I think the best feature so far is when the drives go to sleep they stay asleep. Unit activity does not necessarily wake the drives. That may be more of a feature of the DSM software but also, IMO, the new algorithms in the firmware of the hard drives is part of the equation.I'm sure some of the other features that make the drive quiet and smooth running help.I got two of these when the price of was a Franklin and half each...about the same as WD green series pricing. At the regular price, I don't think they are anything special over the green pricing so for me I would not pay the premium.However, I am happy with the performance thus far and if they failed for any reason not related to the mechanicals of the drive itself I would not hesitate to purchase them again. But really, when do hard drives fail not related to its components?
НеоВояжер-7GEYE
15.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I decided to switch all my 3TB Green drives to 3TB RED ones after the Greens started to fail, ran hot and had poor performance. I'm happy to report the new RED drives run 7 degrees cooler, transfers are always over 100MB! (was only 20-40) and I'm confident they are built to last in NAS setups. I have all 8 drives hooked up via two of these 4-bay USB 3.0 enclosures:Mediasonic HF2-SU3S2 ProBox 4 Bay Hard Drive Enclosure with USB 3.0 & eSATAI also have much higher transfer performance when I added a USB 3.0 hub instead of connecting direct for some reason.Anker® Uspeed USB 3.0 4 Port Hub + 12V 2A Power Adapter + 3ft USB 3.0 Cable , Backward Compatible with USB 2.0I can access one giant pool thanks to stablebit drivepool. (works great, transfers have never been faster)I'll post a link in the comments with more performance and real world details.So again, I fully recommend these if you are serious about home storage. The extra $20 over green is WELL WORTH IT!!!!
ТехноНаблюдатель-1KSQW
28.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Bought this drive because I leave my computer on 24/7. So far, it is very quiet and runs as cool as my Samsung and Hitachi drives. It took less than a couple of minutes using Windows Disk feature from Administrative Tools to format and partition the drive. Since I installed it, It has been working very well without any noticeable sounds or heat issues. I was concerned about buying the other Western Digital or Seagate Hard drives due to all the negative reviews from other customers. I bought the Red Hard drive because it is made to run for long extended period of time. As of today, I am very happy with the drive. Amazon.com packed it very well which kept it from being DOA when I received it.Update: 01/07/2013 Since installing this NAS hard drive in my tower, when you boot up to restore a system image from another hard drive in your computer case, it won't recognize it. It only recognizes the NAS drive. I needed to put my system Image backup on my NAS drive to be able to be recognized during boot up or repair function of Windows 7 or 8. If you have a network, then it won't be a problem but if you don't, be aware that, at least on my computer, it will only recognize the NAS drive during boot up when it comes to restoring your backup. The NAS drive has an embedded program so that it can be used in a Network type of computer configuration but looks like it isn't meant to be installed in a Non-Networked Computer case.
Зета-Орион-8SFAF
21.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I purchased this 2 TB Western Digital Red drive to swap out with the old internal drive of my Owned HR21-100 DirecTV DVR to add some serious recording space. Drive came packaged well from Amazon (double boxed) and checked out well upon arrival. I put the drive in the DVR, allowed the DVR to format it and have been using it for the past 2 weeks or so. 2 TB is a lot of HD recording space when you were previously limited to 500 GB. This drive is extremely quiet, much more quiet that the old OEM WD Drive that it replaced. With your ear right next to the DVR, you can barely tell when it's spinning. Due to several of the included features, this drive is very well suited for a DVR environment. So far, it's running cool and smoothly. Hopefully I'll get many years use out of it.As a side note, in case anyone is thinking about cracking open their DirecTV DVR, most customers do not own their DirecTV receivers and would be breaking their lease agreement by opening the DVR. In fact, I have 2 DVRs and 2 regular HD receivers and only one of them is a customer owned unit. In any case, this drive will function equally as well in an external ESATA enclosure connected to your leased DirecTV DVR without violating your lease agreement.
Интеллектор-0FSXO
28.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Reasonable tradeoff of speed, power consumption and price. No defects so far (according to CrystalDiskInfo) after a couple of complete surface tests.I don't understand why the warranty of the Red isn't at least as long as the Caviar Black. The Black uses more power, spins faster, and lacks the Red's advanced anti-vibration mechanism, which ought to make the Black less reliable than the Red (assuming all else is equal).According to its S.M.A.R.T. health status, this drive's temperature is only 32C. This may be too low for optimum health, because Seagate's large study of Seagate drives found that running too cold (or too hot) increased failure rates significantly. If this were a Seagate drive, I would wrap a blanket around it to raise its temperature a few degrees. I may do that anyway, if I can't find contrary info about Western Digital drives. (On the other hand, it's possible that many of the "too cold" drives in Seagate's study actually generated more heat than the WD Red does and were kept "too" cold by air conditioning. I expect powerful air conditioning would cause uneven temperatures inside the drive--hotter at or near the components that generate the heat, colder at the surface--and perhaps that is what caused the increased failures.)
КиберНаблюдатель-2PLTN
27.02.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I was looking to create a RAID1 setup to help prevent data loss. I chose these drives because they were touted to be designed for 24/7 use at a decent price point (compared to standard desktop drives not built for this, and expensive enterprise level drives). After first installing these drives I was impressed, the speed was great; that was the end of my enjoyment. I was never able to successfully set up my RAID, one or both of the drives would always drop from the setup. The RMA process was painless and within a day I had a replacement; unfortunately that failed as well. In total, through multiple vendors (I originally believed it may have just been a bad batch) I had 7 of these hard drives and only 2 were able to complete the initial RAID setup (let alone actually move data to them), though I was never able to test the two less defective drives together. Be very careful if you decide to use these in any machine that must be reliable.The views posted are solely my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
Капеллан-5TPXQ
28.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
2 drives installed with no problems after two days. Running nicely and very quiet--at 82 & 90 degrees. True, they do take several seconds to spin up from hibernation--if I can't wait 5 seconds, something is wrong with my patience level.I have a hard time believing the "dead on arrival" stories--especially the 3 out of 3. They don't just work instantly like a flash drive. Drives do have to be formatted and file systems installed AFTER they are plugged in, so be sure to tackle that little problem. That is not meant to insult anyone who experienced a problem--I have had a few hard drives die in my 28 years of computing experience.Can a drive be defective or damaged in shipment? Sure. Can a drive die early or get zapped by a power surge? Of course--but that's why I bought *two* and placed them in the DS212j with RAID. Swap a drive and no data loss.Looking forward to years of backup peace of mind now.
Дроид-1IWTQ
25.11.2012
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
First the good news, these drives are really quiet and run relatively cool. They are also one of the least expensive 3 TB drives currently availble certified for use in some NAS models. At least with my shipment, Amazon seems to have (finally!) improved their shipping packaging for hard drives. Mine came double boxed.But the bad news is Western Digital quality control seems to either be nearly non-existant or they simply have cut too many corners with their latest large drives. I purchased four and one failed after only a month. You don't have to search very far on the web to learn many people are having problems with the 3TB Red drives. There are reports of people using these in NAS and other RAID arrays and, while they're waiting for one failed drive to be replaced, another drive fails which means they lose all the data in the entire array. Ouch!There are now only a few companies left making hard drives. It seems with little competition quality is no longer a priority. This is really sad considering how catestrophic data loss can be. I suggest doing lots of research before buying any Red drives. Check the reviews on Newegg for example and look for verfified purchases. WD seems to be rather active in "managing" reviews. It's too bad they don't put a similar effort into making better drives.
ХроноГость-5VGQJ
24.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Purchased this drive for backing up data from my RAID arrays to prevent data loss if one became corrupt. I chose this drive because it is enterprise quality and less expensive / GB than a Caviar Black. The drive passed WD drive tools short and long tests fine, so immediately went into use on my Win7 system. Copying data to this was reasonably fast, 500GB from a RAID array moved at an average of around 80mb/sec . HD Tune test shows max 156, average 115, and minimum 63.7 mb/sec with 16.8ms access time, and 175 burst rate.This saved my data when I recently upgraded an array to a larger size using 4 1TB RE4 drives and had a problem with the resize script which corrupted the array. I will use it for periodic back up, but won't keep it in the case (it's in a back plane so easily removed) to ensure data isn't lost in the event of a power surge or other catastrophe.It's quieter than the RE4 drives, and about the same as a Caviar Black for noise. Runs at 84 degrees F in my case.
Капеллан-0KSWZ
05.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have a Netgear ReadyNAS Ultra4 Plus that had been running with four 1TB Hitachi "enterprise" drives. Needing more capacity, I replaced two of them (so far) with these WD Red 2TB drives. Not only do they work very well, with performance at least as good as the Hitachis, but I find that they run about 10-15F cooler than the Hitachis in the enclosure, which will certainly encourage a longer lifespan.I will likely replace the last two Hitachis with WD Red drives in the near future. An excellent product at a more reasonable price than "enterprise" drives.Edit: March 28, 2013I have now replaced all four Hitachi drives with the WD drives and they're working fine. As I noted above, they run cooler than the Hitachi drives. I did note that the SMART diagnostic feature on the WD drives doesn't report as much information as the Hitachis did, such as a performance rating, but the basic stuff is there.
ТерраБот-3NWLY
13.03.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I have a NAS setup, I originally had 4 Seagate drives in there which worked perfectly for over 3 years. I needed more storage so I ordered 4 of these Red drives which I noted were made specifically for the demands of NAS. The first drive has failed within 5 months. I have had to power the system down o I don't lose any data while I await the arrival of a new drive through WD's rather clumsy warranty procedure. I had to argue with them to get them to pay the cost of postage - why should I have to pay to send back a failed disc drive as well as them taking a $250 charge against my credit card - more than twice the cost of a single drive on Amazon.These are clearly not up the demands of NAS storage - I should imagine that they are no different from their cheaper drives, just branded differently to get people to pay more for the same product!
Туманник-9CWPM
19.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was happy to find that, not only did this drive produce almost no noise or heat, it also proved a very significant upgrade the drive it replaced - which was an upscale but old seagate barricuda. In contrast to that drive, which produces significant noise and heat at idle, the WD Red is nearly silent and very cool to the touch.The red series is designed to function as NAS drives where they are on all the time, but need better performance than the "green" line but not so much as "enterprise" drives and such; for me this is a very appropriate performance point for a desktop that runs much of the time.In this context I used a drive clone to keep all the old drive contents, then partition re-sizer, to tweak the results. System is running excellently with nearly no interruption, as contrasted to the hassle and disruption associated with a complete system re-installation.Drive is highly recommended for scenarios like those for which it was designed, which do go beyond NAS to many medium performance desktops.
Капеллан-9MNDN
13.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I purchased 4 of these drives to create a 12TB RAID5 array with mdadm on Ubuntu 12.04LTS. Prior to putting any trust into them I ran 'badblocks -wsv' on each. Took pretty much an entire weekend to scan all the surfaces. Interestingly enough, one of the drives tended to lag behind the other 3 in progress. Badblocks also indicated a bad sector on it, but SMART did not. I am keeping my eye on that one in particular. All 4 passed short and long SMART tests.Overall -- good drives. The TLER wasn't useful to me -- I am using Linux software RAID. What is more useful is that these drives are designed for 24/7 operation and have tweaks like not parking the heads as frequently. This adds to their reliability compared to something like a WD Green or Black at the cost of power savings (vs the Green) and performance (vs the Black).
Спектр-1OBLY
19.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Red vs GreenRed has 3-year warranty. Green has 2-year warranty.Red uses less power than the Green. (Red power uses 4.10 watts for standby and 4.40 watts for read/write. Green (WD20EZRX) uses 5.50 watts for standby and 6.00 watts for read/write.)Red offers free Premium 24/7 toll free support line. Green offers standard phone support which is free for 30 days from first call. After that it's $14.95 per incident. Phone support is only available during certain hours, but it is available each day, including weekends. Email support is free regardless.My server has 6 Green 2TB drives and one of them was failing. I purchased the Red over the Green because it had a longer warranty and it uses less power. When my other Green drives eventually fail I plan to replace them with the Red.
Квантум-0DWGK
02.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought two of these for my ReadyNAS NVX and it loves them. They are quite and cool. The two of them have been running for only 100 hours so far, but they are holding temps of 32C and 34C. Compared to the Seagates they are sharing the NAS with are running at 34C and 37C.I haven't noticed any speed increase but that could be because they only make up half of the NAS. I still download files at 40MB/sec off the NAS to my single disk desktop (the NAS isn't necessarily the bottleneck)Here is a print out of the full SMART+ StatusSMART AttributeRaw Read Error Rate 0Spin Up Time 5458Start Stop Count 93Reallocated Sector Count 0Seek Error Rate 0Power On Hours 97Spin Retry Count 0Calibration Retry Count 0Power Cycle Count 3Power-Off Retract Count 1Load Cycle Count 91Temperature Celsius 32Reallocated Event Count 0Current Pending Sector 0Offline Uncorrectable 0UDMA CRC Error Count 0Multi Zone Error Rate 0ATA Error Count 0Packaging was great as well. Both drives were in individual boxes with the plastic end caps. Then the boxes were bubbled wrapped and boxes together.I will buy two more when they get back down to $150 each and I have the money.
Синтрон-6YDWC
16.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Ordered these for a great price through Amazon two month ago and it's been running great ever since in my QNAP 659 Pro II. Even though it's meant to be used in a 5-bay NAS, mine is 6, and I haven't gotten any issues. My 4 other Hitachi drives temp are between 100-103 F while these operate at only 87-89. That's a huge difference!! I ran them through the WD Drive Diagnostic test and it was whisper quiet. This is especially important if you have your NAS inside your living room like I do and the spinning drives can be annoying. What it also does is lowers the operating speed on your NAS' cooling fan as well, which means lower operating cost. Once I upgrade to a 10 bay NAS, I will only go with these drives. They're cheap, reliable (TLER is absolutely necessary inside any RAID setup... look it up if you don't know what it does), quite, and fast.
Дроид-5FBMI
19.10.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I can't speak to the longevity or performance compared to other products, but I ordered two of these, and they have both been running for the last 4 hours (without a work load on them) in my Network Attached Storage and are at about 90 degrees F. My NAS ran a test on them and says they're both in good health.*edit a few weeks later:they are also very quiet, and I have transferred a very large amount of data on and off of it every day for the last few weeks... no issues - my Network Attached Storage still says they're in good health. If this "status" ever changes or I encounter any issues, I will at that point amend this review. Until then, assume the previous statements to still be true.Ps. These rated as highly reliable, and spin at 5400 RPM. I would have preferred 7200 RPM for the faster read/write speed, but to get that speed with the same reliability rating in a NAS evironment, the price was double to triple what these were. Also, being limited by network speed and computer processing power, these seem quite good - and I couldn't justify the pay increase for the small speed gain. With the rate at which this technology develops, I'm sure my next upgrade will have more storage, faster speeds, and probably cost less... so I'll wait until then :)
Квазар-0RCIU
16.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was waiting to populate the rest of my new NAS(Synology DS1812+) with the 4TB version of the RED drive that i was hoping to be released maybe sometime this year. But I just got a message from WD saying they have no plans to make another 4TB drive, part from the ones they already have. So no 4TB RED version drive, which is a bummer, maybe to protect their enterprise drives.So my question to all is what 4TB drive and from which manufacturer would be a good fit(low-power, decent-to-high-speed and excellent reliability) for my NAS? I'll mostlybe using it to stream audio and HD videos and a little for data storage.Thanks,DavidPSI also asked about TLER in the RED drives and they said "The WD Red drive does support TLER, And the drive is intellipower so it will change from 5400 to 7200 if it's needed."Also they said to make sure you have a Gigabit network in your system for optimum performance. I guess this is a given.
Квантум-6WJEV
01.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I really really like the concept behind these disks. I was kinda skeptical about them, based on the seemingly high failure rate. But I pulled the trigger and bought the 3Tb model. I built a GPT partition and performed a long format, right out of the box. No trouble was found.After a few weeks of constant operation and having filled it up to about 70% capacity, I did a SMART check on it. The reallocated sector count was definitely higher than I wanted to see (~145 so far), but no catastrophic failures so far. I will be watching it closely.I think Western Digital has a product that could really knock one outta the park...if they just get their QC under control.
НеоВояжер-8MWXF
15.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I got two of these to replace the RAID array in my workstation. The array had been set up with WD Green drives, a configuration not recommended by WD, but at the time, the only WD-recommended drives (the RE black series) were noisy and expensive (though faster). When I swapped out Green for Red, I noticed no increase in noise and no decrease in performance. Plus, the new drives are larger and are approved by WD for 24/7 use and for use in RAID arrays. They carry a longer warranty. Recommended for NAS and workstation RAID when a quiet, economical drive is more important than the last increment of speed.
Квантум-2YWZC
10.11.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I recently bought two of these WD "Red" 3 TB drives to replacetwo WD Caviar Green 2 TB drives (Western Digital 2 TB Caviar Green SATA Intellipower32 MB Cache Bulk/OEM Desktop Hard Drive WD20EADS) in my QNAP TS-259 Pro NAS; theCaviars had been in service since 2010 and I have never had aproblem with them; the RED drives took about 6 hrs to format into RAID-1on the QNAP and I have copied about 2 TB's data to them in the last few days;the QNAP also functions as a second Time Machine backup destination for my MACworkstations; the new RED drives are extremely cool under load and insleep mode; the aluminum case is cool to the touch; drive temps areabout 90 DEG F under load and about 80 DEG F in standby; the drives areextremely quiet as well and the QNAP fan is hardly working....great NASdrives! Write performance in some large video file transfers approached100 MB/sec and read performance of large files varied from 50-70 mb/sec bothhigher by about 30% compared to similar transfers using the Caviars;so far so good...;I'll report back after a month or two to report onreliability of these new drives..for now 4 out of 5 stars
Гиперион-7JJBO
24.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
New Alienware aurora desktop, loaded with ssd main drive.Leaves 3 empty drive bays for upgrades.Needed something as my photo, music, and video server.Easy installation, just slid it right in the tool-less drive bays, started the computer.Remember to go to drive manager to initiate the drive and partition as needed, please read up on this. It is not a simple plug and play device, a little bit of work is needed, though minimal.Very quiet drive, fast for streaming bluray rips, iTunes music at high bit rates, photos load nearly as fast as my ssd.I'm very happy. It runs as what you should expect a good hard drive to do... No more, no less.CheersH
Вектрон-2QWTY
16.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I returned this drive unfortunately. I really wanted it. Could not get it to format with my older MBR(master boot record system). You need to have an up to date computer that is able to format the drive under GPT(GUID partition table). Three TB drives now MUST be formatted in GPT. MBR is not an option. I returned this drive and got the two TB version and voila, done.A little bit about that drive. It is the coolest running drive I've ever seen. The first test of this, I have a USB adapter system to connect bare drives to a computer, and the drive runs continuously until you physically unplug it from the wall. These drives still feel cool and not even the slightest bit warm. I have WD Blue, green, and Black drives that cannot do this. Many of them get very hot during continuous runs for hours.At $109, this drive crushes the competition, and so quietly too.
НаноПилигрим-6ABSO
16.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Granted I Just installed these yesterday, but I thought my feedback might help others. As many of you know older motherboards don't support Hard Drives with capacities larger than 2TB. I am using an ASUS P6T deluxe ( 1st gen 1366 socket i7 ). Something to keep in mind is with this motherboard you have 2 controllers. The Intel, and the Marvell. These Hard Drives will only work on the Intel SATA Ports. After getting these plugged into the right ports, I was able to configure these into a Mirror array using the Disk Management in Windows 7. Don't try to configure your RAID Arrays with these using the Boot Manager. Their Storage will only show 768 ( or something ) GB of storage. You have to setup your array directly in Windows. Also don't forget to set them in GPT ( not MBR ), You will find this setting as you initialize them in Windows 7.Thus far they are working great. I bought these to replace a 2TB WD green drive that was on its death bed.I was getting 120 MB/sec on my SATA 2 Ports when migrating the data from my 2TB to these 3TB drives.
НоваГость-8HLVJ
08.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
These work like a champ so far so good. Using 6 of them in a Thecus N6850 and they work like they are suppose to....like a rockstar. 5 year warranty from WD, made specifically for NAS systems, cool red sticker, quiet, etc....what else to say. Bought from Amazon so packing and shipping was spot on superb. The only negative is the way the prices swing around on this website....up and down, its like timing the stock market buying something on Amazon. Item good - pricing bad. Although I did get the lowest price on these things...at least for a week. Then it went down then back up then down and up and now its at what I paid...at least for the minute. Anyway.....
Плазмонавт-5SRCR
21.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have three 2 TB drives in my home NAS which is running on a Synology DS 1512+ (awesome product btw). I added a large amount of data nad wanted to expand my NAS and was prepared to buy another 2 TB drive from a competing manufacturer when I saw this Red line of drives. I did some research and decided to purchase one (the 3 TB model). I plugged it in and it detected without issue. I ran a SMART test to make sure all was good (and it was) and then expanded my volume (Running Synology Hybrid raid). It took a while but in the end, it added nicely to the volume and I now have a large amount of storage available. I will probably buy another 3 TB drive and add it as a hot standby to handle a drive failure.I would recommend this to anyone deploying a NAS. I use my NAS to store family photos and movies but the NAS gets its workout from the three apple TV's in my house which are streaming Spongebob, Simpsons, Futurama etc. for the kids (and me) :-) The large cache and improved technology aimed at NAS make this a solid choice.
Эксопилот-0ZLUA
29.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have only had two of these installed for four days, but I am delighted at the high performance of these drives. I am consistently reading and writing 120-140 megabytes per second with these drives in a Mediasonic raid box using RAID 1.While the random seek time isn't quite up to par, the sustained read/write speeds with ext4 are superlative. And when I am hitting the cache, the RAID box literally maxes out the SATA speeds. The Samsung drives that I was using previously (not RAID grade drives, also in a RAID 1 configuration) had better random seek times, but were slower at around 80-90 megabytes / second and never had this kind of cache performance.Well done, Western Digital -- very well done. Along with a Crucial M4 SSD as its boot device, this computer is performing like a champ.
Гелиос-6UHCW
16.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have been slowly replacing 3 to 4 year old hard drives in my home server. This is the second Red drive that I have purchased to replace a WD Black Drive. For one thing the Red drive runs about 10 degrees cooler than the Black. WD has stated that these RED drives are running special firmware that handles recovery of bad sectors in a way that would prevent storage controllers from timing out. Since I just run JBOD with StableBit's DrivePool to create the storage pool I wouldn't expect that other drives wold have timed out the pool if they took longer to recover and remap sectors. I plan on buying two more over the next 12 months and may move up to the 3TB model depending on my storage requirements.
Фотон-3GDEH
29.12.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
These Western Digital Red drives are low-power low-performance 5400rpm consumer disk drives! They provide significantly less performance than any 7200rpm disk drive, such as the Western Digital Black and RE4 drives. They are too slow to playback 1080p24 movies without stuttering. Anandtech showed that these Red drives offer a small performance improvement over other low-performance 5400rpm consumer drives like the Green drives when you use them in a RAID configuration. But even in that situation, any 7200rpm drive will offer much greater performance. Bottom line -- these drives are only suitable for backing up your data on a low-power low-performance home server. Don't use them in your desktop or server unless you are willing to endure significantly increased read and write times. Shame on Western Digital for not publishing the spindle rotational speed of these drives.
Астероид-6LZTQ
19.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
After my initial hesitation to purchase these I went ahead and replaced the failing Seagate Barracuda 1.5 TB drives in my Netgear NAS Pro with these. WD recommends using up to 5 in a unit, however Netgear had these on their approved list for the NAS Pro, which holds 6. These drives arrived packaged in individual boxes which seems to have protected them just fine. The drives were made in Jan of 2013 and all of them worked fine with no problems. They do run cooler and quieter than the Seagate drives. Access time seems to be about the same. So far all is well and I am happy with these drives.
Интеллектор-2TPAM
10.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I got the 2TB to replace a dying 320GB WD. The 2TB drive I received had 2 partitions and 2 unallocated spaces. My attempts to format the drive were unsuccessful. Some of my concern was exasperated through the use of an older SATA enclosure that was either, dying or not supporting a 2TB drive. I could only access approx. 756GB capacity. I called WD who told me a new drive should not have any partitions to begin with and offered to replace the item. I am glad they gave me a 3TB in exchange. The new drive works well.
Показаны отзывы 297-344 из 623.
Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
