Отзывы о Жесткий диск Western Digital WD Red Plus 1 ТБ WD10EFRX
609 отзывов пользователей o Western Digital WD Red Plus 1 ТБ WD10EFRX
Пользовались
Western Digital WD Red Plus 1 ТБ WD10EFRX?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
19.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Red vs GreenRed has 3-year warranty. Green has 2-year warranty.Red uses less power than the Green. (Red power uses 4.10 watts for standby and 4.40 watts for read/write. Green (WD20EZRX) uses 5.50 watts for standby and 6.00 watts for read/write.)Red offers free Premium 24/7 toll free support line. Green offers standard phone support which is free for 30 days from first call. After that it's $14.95 per incident. Phone support is only available during certain hours, but it is available each day, including weekends. Email support is free regardless.My server has 6 Green 2TB drives and one of them was failing. I purchased the Red over the Green because it had a longer warranty and it uses less power. When my other Green drives eventually fail I plan to replace them with the Red.
Скроменый эксперт
02.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought two of these for my ReadyNAS NVX and it loves them. They are quite and cool. The two of them have been running for only 100 hours so far, but they are holding temps of 32C and 34C. Compared to the Seagates they are sharing the NAS with are running at 34C and 37C.I haven't noticed any speed increase but that could be because they only make up half of the NAS. I still download files at 40MB/sec off the NAS to my single disk desktop (the NAS isn't necessarily the bottleneck)Here is a print out of the full SMART+ StatusSMART AttributeRaw Read Error Rate 0Spin Up Time 5458Start Stop Count 93Reallocated Sector Count 0Seek Error Rate 0Power On Hours 97Spin Retry Count 0Calibration Retry Count 0Power Cycle Count 3Power-Off Retract Count 1Load Cycle Count 91Temperature Celsius 32Reallocated Event Count 0Current Pending Sector 0Offline Uncorrectable 0UDMA CRC Error Count 0Multi Zone Error Rate 0ATA Error Count 0Packaging was great as well. Both drives were in individual boxes with the plastic end caps. Then the boxes were bubbled wrapped and boxes together.I will buy two more when they get back down to $150 each and I have the money.
Скроменый эксперт
16.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Ordered these for a great price through Amazon two month ago and it's been running great ever since in my QNAP 659 Pro II. Even though it's meant to be used in a 5-bay NAS, mine is 6, and I haven't gotten any issues. My 4 other Hitachi drives temp are between 100-103 F while these operate at only 87-89. That's a huge difference!! I ran them through the WD Drive Diagnostic test and it was whisper quiet. This is especially important if you have your NAS inside your living room like I do and the spinning drives can be annoying. What it also does is lowers the operating speed on your NAS' cooling fan as well, which means lower operating cost. Once I upgrade to a 10 bay NAS, I will only go with these drives. They're cheap, reliable (TLER is absolutely necessary inside any RAID setup... look it up if you don't know what it does), quite, and fast.
Скроменый эксперт
19.10.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I can't speak to the longevity or performance compared to other products, but I ordered two of these, and they have both been running for the last 4 hours (without a work load on them) in my Network Attached Storage and are at about 90 degrees F. My NAS ran a test on them and says they're both in good health.*edit a few weeks later:they are also very quiet, and I have transferred a very large amount of data on and off of it every day for the last few weeks... no issues - my Network Attached Storage still says they're in good health. If this "status" ever changes or I encounter any issues, I will at that point amend this review. Until then, assume the previous statements to still be true.Ps. These rated as highly reliable, and spin at 5400 RPM. I would have preferred 7200 RPM for the faster read/write speed, but to get that speed with the same reliability rating in a NAS evironment, the price was double to triple what these were. Also, being limited by network speed and computer processing power, these seem quite good - and I couldn't justify the pay increase for the small speed gain. With the rate at which this technology develops, I'm sure my next upgrade will have more storage, faster speeds, and probably cost less... so I'll wait until then :)
Скроменый эксперт
16.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was waiting to populate the rest of my new NAS(Synology DS1812+) with the 4TB version of the RED drive that i was hoping to be released maybe sometime this year. But I just got a message from WD saying they have no plans to make another 4TB drive, part from the ones they already have. So no 4TB RED version drive, which is a bummer, maybe to protect their enterprise drives.So my question to all is what 4TB drive and from which manufacturer would be a good fit(low-power, decent-to-high-speed and excellent reliability) for my NAS? I'll mostlybe using it to stream audio and HD videos and a little for data storage.Thanks,DavidPSI also asked about TLER in the RED drives and they said "The WD Red drive does support TLER, And the drive is intellipower so it will change from 5400 to 7200 if it's needed."Also they said to make sure you have a Gigabit network in your system for optimum performance. I guess this is a given.
Скроменый эксперт
01.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I really really like the concept behind these disks. I was kinda skeptical about them, based on the seemingly high failure rate. But I pulled the trigger and bought the 3Tb model. I built a GPT partition and performed a long format, right out of the box. No trouble was found.After a few weeks of constant operation and having filled it up to about 70% capacity, I did a SMART check on it. The reallocated sector count was definitely higher than I wanted to see (~145 so far), but no catastrophic failures so far. I will be watching it closely.I think Western Digital has a product that could really knock one outta the park...if they just get their QC under control.
Скроменый эксперт
15.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I got two of these to replace the RAID array in my workstation. The array had been set up with WD Green drives, a configuration not recommended by WD, but at the time, the only WD-recommended drives (the RE black series) were noisy and expensive (though faster). When I swapped out Green for Red, I noticed no increase in noise and no decrease in performance. Plus, the new drives are larger and are approved by WD for 24/7 use and for use in RAID arrays. They carry a longer warranty. Recommended for NAS and workstation RAID when a quiet, economical drive is more important than the last increment of speed.
Скроменый эксперт
10.11.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I recently bought two of these WD "Red" 3 TB drives to replacetwo WD Caviar Green 2 TB drives (Western Digital 2 TB Caviar Green SATA Intellipower32 MB Cache Bulk/OEM Desktop Hard Drive WD20EADS) in my QNAP TS-259 Pro NAS; theCaviars had been in service since 2010 and I have never had aproblem with them; the RED drives took about 6 hrs to format into RAID-1on the QNAP and I have copied about 2 TB's data to them in the last few days;the QNAP also functions as a second Time Machine backup destination for my MACworkstations; the new RED drives are extremely cool under load and insleep mode; the aluminum case is cool to the touch; drive temps areabout 90 DEG F under load and about 80 DEG F in standby; the drives areextremely quiet as well and the QNAP fan is hardly working....great NASdrives! Write performance in some large video file transfers approached100 MB/sec and read performance of large files varied from 50-70 mb/sec bothhigher by about 30% compared to similar transfers using the Caviars;so far so good...;I'll report back after a month or two to report onreliability of these new drives..for now 4 out of 5 stars
Скроменый эксперт
24.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
New Alienware aurora desktop, loaded with ssd main drive.Leaves 3 empty drive bays for upgrades.Needed something as my photo, music, and video server.Easy installation, just slid it right in the tool-less drive bays, started the computer.Remember to go to drive manager to initiate the drive and partition as needed, please read up on this. It is not a simple plug and play device, a little bit of work is needed, though minimal.Very quiet drive, fast for streaming bluray rips, iTunes music at high bit rates, photos load nearly as fast as my ssd.I'm very happy. It runs as what you should expect a good hard drive to do... No more, no less.CheersH
Скроменый эксперт
16.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I returned this drive unfortunately. I really wanted it. Could not get it to format with my older MBR(master boot record system). You need to have an up to date computer that is able to format the drive under GPT(GUID partition table). Three TB drives now MUST be formatted in GPT. MBR is not an option. I returned this drive and got the two TB version and voila, done.A little bit about that drive. It is the coolest running drive I've ever seen. The first test of this, I have a USB adapter system to connect bare drives to a computer, and the drive runs continuously until you physically unplug it from the wall. These drives still feel cool and not even the slightest bit warm. I have WD Blue, green, and Black drives that cannot do this. Many of them get very hot during continuous runs for hours.At $109, this drive crushes the competition, and so quietly too.
Скроменый эксперт
16.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Granted I Just installed these yesterday, but I thought my feedback might help others. As many of you know older motherboards don't support Hard Drives with capacities larger than 2TB. I am using an ASUS P6T deluxe ( 1st gen 1366 socket i7 ). Something to keep in mind is with this motherboard you have 2 controllers. The Intel, and the Marvell. These Hard Drives will only work on the Intel SATA Ports. After getting these plugged into the right ports, I was able to configure these into a Mirror array using the Disk Management in Windows 7. Don't try to configure your RAID Arrays with these using the Boot Manager. Their Storage will only show 768 ( or something ) GB of storage. You have to setup your array directly in Windows. Also don't forget to set them in GPT ( not MBR ), You will find this setting as you initialize them in Windows 7.Thus far they are working great. I bought these to replace a 2TB WD green drive that was on its death bed.I was getting 120 MB/sec on my SATA 2 Ports when migrating the data from my 2TB to these 3TB drives.
Скроменый эксперт
08.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
These work like a champ so far so good. Using 6 of them in a Thecus N6850 and they work like they are suppose to....like a rockstar. 5 year warranty from WD, made specifically for NAS systems, cool red sticker, quiet, etc....what else to say. Bought from Amazon so packing and shipping was spot on superb. The only negative is the way the prices swing around on this website....up and down, its like timing the stock market buying something on Amazon. Item good - pricing bad. Although I did get the lowest price on these things...at least for a week. Then it went down then back up then down and up and now its at what I paid...at least for the minute. Anyway.....
Скроменый эксперт
21.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have three 2 TB drives in my home NAS which is running on a Synology DS 1512+ (awesome product btw). I added a large amount of data nad wanted to expand my NAS and was prepared to buy another 2 TB drive from a competing manufacturer when I saw this Red line of drives. I did some research and decided to purchase one (the 3 TB model). I plugged it in and it detected without issue. I ran a SMART test to make sure all was good (and it was) and then expanded my volume (Running Synology Hybrid raid). It took a while but in the end, it added nicely to the volume and I now have a large amount of storage available. I will probably buy another 3 TB drive and add it as a hot standby to handle a drive failure.I would recommend this to anyone deploying a NAS. I use my NAS to store family photos and movies but the NAS gets its workout from the three apple TV's in my house which are streaming Spongebob, Simpsons, Futurama etc. for the kids (and me) :-) The large cache and improved technology aimed at NAS make this a solid choice.
Скроменый эксперт
29.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have only had two of these installed for four days, but I am delighted at the high performance of these drives. I am consistently reading and writing 120-140 megabytes per second with these drives in a Mediasonic raid box using RAID 1.While the random seek time isn't quite up to par, the sustained read/write speeds with ext4 are superlative. And when I am hitting the cache, the RAID box literally maxes out the SATA speeds. The Samsung drives that I was using previously (not RAID grade drives, also in a RAID 1 configuration) had better random seek times, but were slower at around 80-90 megabytes / second and never had this kind of cache performance.Well done, Western Digital -- very well done. Along with a Crucial M4 SSD as its boot device, this computer is performing like a champ.
Скроменый эксперт
16.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have been slowly replacing 3 to 4 year old hard drives in my home server. This is the second Red drive that I have purchased to replace a WD Black Drive. For one thing the Red drive runs about 10 degrees cooler than the Black. WD has stated that these RED drives are running special firmware that handles recovery of bad sectors in a way that would prevent storage controllers from timing out. Since I just run JBOD with StableBit's DrivePool to create the storage pool I wouldn't expect that other drives wold have timed out the pool if they took longer to recover and remap sectors. I plan on buying two more over the next 12 months and may move up to the 3TB model depending on my storage requirements.
Скроменый эксперт
29.12.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
These Western Digital Red drives are low-power low-performance 5400rpm consumer disk drives! They provide significantly less performance than any 7200rpm disk drive, such as the Western Digital Black and RE4 drives. They are too slow to playback 1080p24 movies without stuttering. Anandtech showed that these Red drives offer a small performance improvement over other low-performance 5400rpm consumer drives like the Green drives when you use them in a RAID configuration. But even in that situation, any 7200rpm drive will offer much greater performance. Bottom line -- these drives are only suitable for backing up your data on a low-power low-performance home server. Don't use them in your desktop or server unless you are willing to endure significantly increased read and write times. Shame on Western Digital for not publishing the spindle rotational speed of these drives.
Скроменый эксперт
19.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
After my initial hesitation to purchase these I went ahead and replaced the failing Seagate Barracuda 1.5 TB drives in my Netgear NAS Pro with these. WD recommends using up to 5 in a unit, however Netgear had these on their approved list for the NAS Pro, which holds 6. These drives arrived packaged in individual boxes which seems to have protected them just fine. The drives were made in Jan of 2013 and all of them worked fine with no problems. They do run cooler and quieter than the Seagate drives. Access time seems to be about the same. So far all is well and I am happy with these drives.
Скроменый эксперт
10.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I got the 2TB to replace a dying 320GB WD. The 2TB drive I received had 2 partitions and 2 unallocated spaces. My attempts to format the drive were unsuccessful. Some of my concern was exasperated through the use of an older SATA enclosure that was either, dying or not supporting a 2TB drive. I could only access approx. 756GB capacity. I called WD who told me a new drive should not have any partitions to begin with and offered to replace the item. I am glad they gave me a 3TB in exchange. The new drive works well.
Скроменый эксперт
15.02.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Purchased 2 of these drives so far. 1 to replace a failed drive in my readynas pro business running Quantity-6 seagate 1.5TB AS drives and the other to start the total disk replacement of my NAS. I'm running 6 drives with dual redundancy and had a seagate fail after 4 years. Time to start thinking about a total replace one drive at a time as I don't want to worry about old drives failing. WD Red seems targeted towards NAS devices. I really wanted to put the WD Black drive in but economy dictated the WD Red drive. If you can afford to populate your NAS with the black go for it. I plan on buying 4 more of these drives to move my storage capacity up and also have drives under warranty.
Скроменый эксперт
10.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I hesitated to buy this drive. One of the Western Digital 2TB caviar green drives that I use for system and data backups failed, and most of the reviews said that this drive was overkill for a backup drive. I beg to differ. There was very little price difference between this red drive and WD's "lesser" drives, but the speed difference is phenomenal! I have not gone to the trouble of measuring the actual speed performance, but this drive easily completes backups in less than half the time taken by my "green" drives. Also, since this drive is intended for NAS arrays, it is unlikely that there will be any data loss, which can be a problem with those drives intended for streaming media, where a bit or byte won't be missed. I would highly recommend this drive, and shipping from Amazon was super fast, as usual.
Скроменый эксперт
29.11.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Bought 3 of these drives to go into a ZFS storage pool (raidz). No cables provided with drives, so I am subtracting 1 star from review. All drives were immediate recognized by Ubuntu 12.0.4 server. Formatted capacity of each drive was a little over 2.7 TB. After creation of the storage pool, useful storage available was 5.4 TB (8.1 TB counting parity). Initial test of the write speed of the array was 162 MB/sec, copying from /dev/zero. I was also able to copy 51 GB of multimedia files from another drive in the box to the array in less than 10 minutes. Everything appears stable. The three drives added approximately 50 additional watts of power on the UPS (72 to 125 watts). Will post additional review after I have done additional burn-in and load testing.Addendum -- Have now run the drives for several weeks. I have 1.2 TB stored in the array without any read, write or checksum errors. Drives to this point have been 100 percent stable.
Скроменый эксперт
23.03.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I installed this in my desktop as a backup drive. Worked great while it lasted. Quiet, cooler temps, and faster data transfer times. One day I noticed that the hard drive activity light was a constant red. I tried to access it through chkdsk, but it had trouble reading it and eventually found a bunch of bad sectors. Shortly afterwards, the operating system and the BIOS could not see the drive.I do have to credit Western Digital for their quick turnaround time to receive the RMA Recertified drive. Hopefully this one will last longer, but time will tell.
Скроменый эксперт
06.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
After having all five of my Seagate 7200.11 drives (three old, two brand new) fail within a month of each other, I decide to go back to Western Digital after years of avoiding them because of the silent TLER firmware snafu they perpetrated. (To be clear, I didn't mind them dropping the feature from consumer-level drives to push people to more expensive commercial or, now available, Red drives. What I minded was them silently dropping it in the middle of a production run and failing to tell anyone that their website claims of the drive being suitable for use in all consumer desktops were now totally false.)After a month of continuous but light use in a ZFS box, these three WD Reds have been infinitely more stable than the Seagates. Only time will tell if they hold up like my pre-TLER-snafu WD drives have.
Скроменый эксперт
02.01.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Working for one month now without flaws. Using it in a simple JBOD setting for backups.I am hopeful it will sustain the test of time. If so, I will go with those drives from now on, since my one year old Seagate drives fail one after the other, and the painfully obtained replacements through self paid return shipping from Seagate fail even faster. No more Seagate!I used to buy Samsung 2TB drives, of which 8 are running flawlessly without a single failure yet. But since those drives are Seagate as well now, they are no longer an option for me either. Hopefully WD will be reliable again.Will report an update in a few months.------------------ UPDATE 2/25/2013 -----------------------The drive FAILED after running 3 months flawlessly. Disappeared from windows explorer and never came back. SMART error. Initiated RMA today...
Показаны отзывы 313-336 из 609.
