Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R
468 отзывов пользователей o Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R
Пользовались
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

It cost under $9 after coupon, so it was worth it overall.




In reading some of the negative reviews it has become apparent many people have the wrong expectations of the RX1. Let's look at what you can expect, and what you can't.
What to expect:
1. Unmatched image quality. At the end of the day isn't this the most important aspect of any camera? Simply put, the RX1 will give you beautiful images.
2. Low light capabilities. I've shot many indoor pics including in a dark restaurant, and have yet to use the flash. How this little camera can produce such stunning images in low light is, to me, one of it's strongest features. Now I understand why Sony chose to not include image stabilization for stills; it doesn't need it. You can always adjust the ISO to get the shutter speed needed for hand-held shots (not to mention the high speed lens). The full frame chip constantly produces low noise images even at relatively high ISO.
3. Customizable buttons & dials. This is a great asset when conditions require a quick change of settings.
4. Rich colors & creamy bokeh. The people at Zeiss got this lens right. And it's WAY sharp at all apertures.
5. First class build quality. Feels very solid & well machined.
6. Last, but certainly not least, is portability. No camera is worth anything if you don't have it with you. You'll find yourself grabbing the RX1 at times you most likely would have left that hefty DSLR & lenses at home.
What not to expect:
1. Long range shooting. You must learn to use 35mm as your only focal length. (okay, it does allow for 50mm & 70mm "zoom" but it's merely cropping). I read Steve Huff's article on how shooting exclusively with a 35mm fixed lens can make you a better photographer. He makes some good points. I should mention that I do like birding, so I'm keeping my Minolta D7 with a Sony 70-300mm G lens for that purpose.
2. Price. This is debatable. Clearly Sony has created this camera for the serious photographer, and not the casual consumer. If image quality is your primary need, this could be considered a bargain.
3. Lack of an included viewfinder. I will be getting the EVF when it's available, however I don't miss it to the degree I thought I would. My guess is Sony was not able to hold the price of the RX1 below $3000 with an EVF.
Conclusion:
The RX1 is unlike any other camera in the world, and Sony has hit a home run with it. You'll find yourself amazed by the images it can produce. If you have the proper expectations for the RX1, you will certainly be pleased. Just don't expect it to be what it's not.


I had a perfect application, But this thing screams Cheap.I took it off after 3 days of use and bought another more better screen protector.
Battery life is good and at 1600mAh its higher than the standard sony Battery Camera, Although There were times when the Battery went from full to Zero without warning I only experienced this twice. But I think it gave me a standard useage time.
EVerything just works its a decent purchase









Stand out Pros:
The Lens on the RX1 is superb. Extraordinarily sharp even wide open and really nice smooth bokeh. The lens and sensor will give you more resolution, less depth of field (when you want it), & better low light performance than the X100. The focus speed on the RX1 is better but not by a huge amount. They both struggle in low light even with the AF light enabled. The MF is much better on the RX1. The X100 takes way too many turns plus doesn't have Sony's excellent "Focus Peeking". This is a mute point if you are now considering the Fuji X100S and not the X100 since focus speed & manual focus look to be even better than the RX1.
Stand out Cons:
Not having a built in viewfinder really started to bug me after the initial "this thing is tiny and has a Full Frame Sensor in it" excitement wore off. I also missed the X100's flash that always seemed to give perfectly balanced shots in low light. AF was the last nail in the coffin. Why didn't Sony use their 24mp sensor with on-sensor phase detection like their A99 has? Why if there is enough light for me to use focus peeking and pretty easily manually focus does the AF still miss completely? This happened more than a few times to me in low restaurant lighting. The price is a bit of a con for most too although the sum of it's parts really do add up right now. It would have been a much better value if it had a built in viewfinder though. I'm sure the next version will.
If you have the money to burn the RX1 is an amazing image making machine. I just missed the X100's built in viewfinder, flash and overall feel too much that when I learned of the X100S I decided I would preorder that and send the RX1 back. I will miss the beautiful Carl Zeiss lens and awesome 24mp sensor of the RX1. The usability of the X100S should better suit me though. I wrote a mini review/ comparison between the RX1 & X100 on my blog, portraitSF. Google would probably help you find it if you wanted to read more of my thoughts & to see some comparison photos. "Sony RX1 vs Fuji X100 - Mini Review with Comparison Photos"

The microfiber and screen covers I haven't bothered using, but the batteries and charger alone were worth more than I paid for this. Especially compared to what Sony charges for name-brand replacements.

This is my first Sony camera and the operating system is not intuitive, at least not to me. There are two manuals: There's a crappy newsprint manual that comes with the camera that is badly written and covers only the simple basics. The second manual is complete but is in PDF format only and must be downloaded from Sony. For three grand I think they could throw in a nice glossy high quality manual. The software also must be downloaded and it isn't great software. You don't' really need their software with iphoto and Photoshop but still, it would have been nice. Since I'm griping I may as well mention the strap. The photos and videos on Sony's website show this really nice leather strap. The real camera comes with a standard nylon strap. The leather one must be bought separately. It's not a huge deal but please give me the product you show me.
The justification I used for the purchase was this: I started photography over 40 years ago with a Nikomat FTN and a 50mm 1.4 lens. I loved it and it's the only equipment I owned for years. Then the gadget lust set in and pretty soon I'd have a 30 pound bag full of photo crap. All that junk became too cumbersome to carry around and the simple joy and creativity of shooting was gone. This is a dive into high quality digital but also a return to the simplicity of a basic one-lens rig. I went for the RX1R because I do mostly nature shooting and am in love with fine crisp images.

Pretty disappointed considering the price point of the screen protector, I would think a general full adhesive screen protector would do a better job as long as you squeeze out air bubbles.


A couple of weeks later, my friend convinced me to get the Sony A7 with the Zeiss F2.8 lens. When I walked into Best Buy, I bought the Sony RX1r with the intention of returning the camera while I shopped around for two weeks for a great price on the Sony A7.
It's been over two months since I walked into Best Buy to purchase a camera. I'm not a professional, but this camera gives me no intention of ever buying another camera ever again.
I would suggest you rent the camera or "borrow" from an online store. I was fortunate enough to test the Sony A7 w/Zeiss F2.8, Nex-6 w/Zeiss 24mm F1.8, and the Sony RX1r for an entire week of camping; the RX1r stole my heart.
The only camera I owned before was a Canon S110.
p.s. I loved the camera so much, I gave it to my mother as a present today after re-reading all these wonderful Amazon reviews. I'm pretty confident she'll love it. =)


