Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R
468 отзывов пользователей o Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R
Пользовались
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
09.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
On the hunt for a backpacking travel camera I came across the adage: buy as much camera as you can afford. That directive coupled with portability, simplicity, and image quality brought my attention to the Sony RX1. After renting this and several other cameras for comparison, I went for it and am happy RX1 owner.
Less is more: In my mind, the biggest advantage of the RX1 is its simplicity of use. I'm coming from a very minor photographic background. I learned how to frame and find interesting subjects mostly through the lens of a smartphone. Needless to say, ISO, exposure, aperture, and shutter speed were terms I knew nothing about. I wanted something that didn't rely on the 'right' settings. Having said that, I'm also a willing student and wanted to find a camera I could grow with. The RX1's external dials and on-lens aperture ring were the perfect solution. Instead of burying these key elements of photography in menus, they're right at your fingertips. I can't express how important this was for a beginner.
The single focal length was critical to transitioning from smartphone to full-frame (I know, it's probably an atypical transition, but one I could see more making as full-frame prices come down and the photography bug hits a younger generation that grew up with their smartphones as their sole photographic instrument). Instead of evaluating focal length, zooms, and aperture capability the RX1 simplifies the equation. The 35mm focal length is strikingly similar to that of the iPhone. There was no framing adjustment needed whatsoever. Sure, I may lose the flexibility of interchangeable lens systems, but my current needs not only didn't match up with those systems, the increased flexibility comes with increased complexity.
Shoot and marvel: The image quality of this camera blows my mind. The bokeh is beautiful. The image is incredibly sharp. The colors are brilliant. The B&W conversions have tons of character. Even all the way up to ISO 25600, the camera gives me shots that are amazing.
Alternatives: I rented three other cameras in my search: Fujifilm X100s, Nikon V1 w/32 mm, Sony a7 w/35mm. Let's start with the X100s. A beautiful camera with a brilliant JPEG rendering. I don't enjoy post-processing and with the X100s I didn't have to. However, the camera wasn't quick to lock focus, had a confusing menu system, and never gave me a shot that dropped my jaw. The Nikon V1 was incredibly fast to auto-focus. I mean, it focused before I knew what I wanted to shoot! The pictures I was getting out of the 32mm lens (an 85mm equivalent) were very interesting. That combo has potential. But, again, the menu system and settings were far more complicated than I wanted to endure. Everything is buried in menus. Not the experience I want when firing on the streets of Phnom Penh. Last, the Sony a7. Great size, great image quality. Obviously very similar to the RX1 in a lot of regards. However, the 35mm F2.8 lens just couldn't match the output of the RX1. I think in a year or two a really great 35mm F2 or F1.8 lens will be released that could meet or surpass the RX1. But for my current needs, the a7 didn't leave me with the same feeling. All three are great cameras and have received plaudits from more experience photographers than me. But the RX1 was the perfect instrument for my photographic needs at this point in my shooting.
Less is more: In my mind, the biggest advantage of the RX1 is its simplicity of use. I'm coming from a very minor photographic background. I learned how to frame and find interesting subjects mostly through the lens of a smartphone. Needless to say, ISO, exposure, aperture, and shutter speed were terms I knew nothing about. I wanted something that didn't rely on the 'right' settings. Having said that, I'm also a willing student and wanted to find a camera I could grow with. The RX1's external dials and on-lens aperture ring were the perfect solution. Instead of burying these key elements of photography in menus, they're right at your fingertips. I can't express how important this was for a beginner.
The single focal length was critical to transitioning from smartphone to full-frame (I know, it's probably an atypical transition, but one I could see more making as full-frame prices come down and the photography bug hits a younger generation that grew up with their smartphones as their sole photographic instrument). Instead of evaluating focal length, zooms, and aperture capability the RX1 simplifies the equation. The 35mm focal length is strikingly similar to that of the iPhone. There was no framing adjustment needed whatsoever. Sure, I may lose the flexibility of interchangeable lens systems, but my current needs not only didn't match up with those systems, the increased flexibility comes with increased complexity.
Shoot and marvel: The image quality of this camera blows my mind. The bokeh is beautiful. The image is incredibly sharp. The colors are brilliant. The B&W conversions have tons of character. Even all the way up to ISO 25600, the camera gives me shots that are amazing.
Alternatives: I rented three other cameras in my search: Fujifilm X100s, Nikon V1 w/32 mm, Sony a7 w/35mm. Let's start with the X100s. A beautiful camera with a brilliant JPEG rendering. I don't enjoy post-processing and with the X100s I didn't have to. However, the camera wasn't quick to lock focus, had a confusing menu system, and never gave me a shot that dropped my jaw. The Nikon V1 was incredibly fast to auto-focus. I mean, it focused before I knew what I wanted to shoot! The pictures I was getting out of the 32mm lens (an 85mm equivalent) were very interesting. That combo has potential. But, again, the menu system and settings were far more complicated than I wanted to endure. Everything is buried in menus. Not the experience I want when firing on the streets of Phnom Penh. Last, the Sony a7. Great size, great image quality. Obviously very similar to the RX1 in a lot of regards. However, the 35mm F2.8 lens just couldn't match the output of the RX1. I think in a year or two a really great 35mm F2 or F1.8 lens will be released that could meet or surpass the RX1. But for my current needs, the a7 didn't leave me with the same feeling. All three are great cameras and have received plaudits from more experience photographers than me. But the RX1 was the perfect instrument for my photographic needs at this point in my shooting.
Скроменый эксперт
27.01.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I had Nikon D90 with 35mm 1.8 lens before owning this. I am casual user who just needs a camera to capture memories from couple of trips and few occasions every year. Naturally like anyone, I want to get the best quality (looking) pictures with not much need of post processing. I have basic skills to get the job done and dont mind spending some money for the same. I have been satisfied with D90 results but always felt it lacks the pop and sometime due to size of DLSR I will just end up taking pics with my smartphone under utilizing D90. I started looking for something which is small but with comparable image quality of DSLR in most situations and ended up getting RX1 after some research and seeing samples.
The image quality out of this camera will blow you off. Its capable of taking sharp pictures even in absolute low light and you will be amazed by the results and will keep pushing the button and take more pictures. Its outstanding innovation and I cant think how the camera industry will change over next few years. It offers the best image quality I have come across any camera so far specifically at this price point and size. Even any critical reviewer will agree with it so there are no questions on this.
The biggest question - is it right choice for me?
1. Autofocus - The camera has slow autofocus which means you will not able to capture sports, kids etc. Sometimes you will be frustrated. But when it locks the focus, you are pulled into its magic again. if fast autofocus is absolute must then this is no go.
2. Lens: The lens is fixed and crazy sharp. Its like getting an iphone where you are pretty much tied to an experience as per apple. But the fixed lens is what gives its consistent and superb image quality. If you cant work with a fixed focal length then this is no go.
3. Battery Life: Yes battery life is bad for professional users. For me, I need to charge once a day and if I am carrying spare this is not a big problem. But it is an inconvenience for sure and for any professional users it may be a deal breaker. One thing I noticed is as it is so fun to take pictures, I am draining my battery faster pace than I would normally do. From my experience you can get around 225-250 shots without flash easily.
4. Pricing: This is definitely not cheap specially with above constraints but not as expensive as many claim. Think of it as you are buying a high end DSLR with one best lens. Flexibility and autofocus of DSLR are negated by size benefit you are getting. I was able to get really good price from amazon warehouse and was able to pay with discounted gift cards which I was able to get from many other deals around thanksgiving/christmas so it was moot point for me. I recouped most of it by selling my existing gear as I don't want to be invested heavily and not missing anything. Accessory pricing is out of this world and thats the only reason I am taking one star off. I would love to get a EVF but cant justfy at that price.
I believe most of these points are covered in all the reviews. There are few users who are very happy and few who are very disappointed. So it shows clearly, this is not meant for everyone. Product itself is awesome and best technology you can buy at this point of time. Just weigh in your needs when you consider with above constraints before you make a purchase. You will not be disappointed.
The image quality out of this camera will blow you off. Its capable of taking sharp pictures even in absolute low light and you will be amazed by the results and will keep pushing the button and take more pictures. Its outstanding innovation and I cant think how the camera industry will change over next few years. It offers the best image quality I have come across any camera so far specifically at this price point and size. Even any critical reviewer will agree with it so there are no questions on this.
The biggest question - is it right choice for me?
1. Autofocus - The camera has slow autofocus which means you will not able to capture sports, kids etc. Sometimes you will be frustrated. But when it locks the focus, you are pulled into its magic again. if fast autofocus is absolute must then this is no go.
2. Lens: The lens is fixed and crazy sharp. Its like getting an iphone where you are pretty much tied to an experience as per apple. But the fixed lens is what gives its consistent and superb image quality. If you cant work with a fixed focal length then this is no go.
3. Battery Life: Yes battery life is bad for professional users. For me, I need to charge once a day and if I am carrying spare this is not a big problem. But it is an inconvenience for sure and for any professional users it may be a deal breaker. One thing I noticed is as it is so fun to take pictures, I am draining my battery faster pace than I would normally do. From my experience you can get around 225-250 shots without flash easily.
4. Pricing: This is definitely not cheap specially with above constraints but not as expensive as many claim. Think of it as you are buying a high end DSLR with one best lens. Flexibility and autofocus of DSLR are negated by size benefit you are getting. I was able to get really good price from amazon warehouse and was able to pay with discounted gift cards which I was able to get from many other deals around thanksgiving/christmas so it was moot point for me. I recouped most of it by selling my existing gear as I don't want to be invested heavily and not missing anything. Accessory pricing is out of this world and thats the only reason I am taking one star off. I would love to get a EVF but cant justfy at that price.
I believe most of these points are covered in all the reviews. There are few users who are very happy and few who are very disappointed. So it shows clearly, this is not meant for everyone. Product itself is awesome and best technology you can buy at this point of time. Just weigh in your needs when you consider with above constraints before you make a purchase. You will not be disappointed.
Скроменый эксперт
01.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Before buying, I was worried about the following questions:
1) is it too expensive for what I'm getting?
2) will I be limited by 35mm focal length ?
3) is the auto-focus speed a problem ?
4) is there some other camera out there that is better than this one?
5) will I miss the view finder?
Here are the answers I have learned after buying this camera:
This camera is a game changing camera. The jpg files that come out of it, without editing are so delicious that it pretty much turns everyday snapshots into magic.
1) The cost is totally justified because of how great the images come out even before editing. The amount of flexibility in playing around with whats in focus on the full frame sensor, through this f 2.0 lens with crystal sharp clarity makes it worth it. The perfect ergonomics, and still fast shooting speed, and unequaled low light performance makes it worth it. The fact that its so small and light and can feasibly be carried everywhere with you at any time, makes it worth it.
2) for the first week, yes. After a week, no. You have to learn to move yourself around a little bit. If you can't take 2 steps forward or 2 steps backward, then move to a different angle. Your compositions will improve by learning this. Need to zoom in? no problem - this camera has digital zoom and you can zoom 200%. because its 24 mpx, its no problem at all. Need to take a huge landscape and wish you had a 10 mm wideangle on a full frame body? use panoramic mode and get the job done. for the 99% of pictures I take, with family and friends, doing cool things and living life? 35mm is perfect. Its not portrait photography and its not landscapes. Its portraits IN landscapes.
3) Auto-focus speed. I really think the complaints about this are ridiculous and stupid. In normal lighting, it is just as fast as my canon 5d. No thought need enter your mind about how long will the camera take to focus. You compose the pic, and push the button and it takes the picture. In VERY low light, like a dark restaurant with 1 candle in it, it will hunt for 0.5-1.5 seconds, and then lock on. I would like to remind those people, who are NOT taking life changing pictures 8 times every second of every day, that you can probably afford to hold the camera up for 1 second and let it lock on to the target. I'd also like to remind those people who don't have even 1 extra second, about what they are getting in exchange for that 1 second - they got to go out for the night carrying a tiny camera in their palm, which can shoot dslr quality photos, instead of a 5 pound DSLR rig with a 10 inch lens sticking out. For those whose life depends on trying to freeze frame a golf ball coming off the driver head in 1/10000 sec, at midnight, then yes, this is the wrong camera for you. While I'm on the issue of low light, try taking a picture of people in normal city lighting at night at 6400 iso and be amazed at how the picture glows and feel vibrant and alive.
4) in the market of small size cameras with full frame sensors and top quality lenses, well this camera has exactly Zero competitors. This is the only camera of its kind.
5) I haven't felt the lack of a view finder (not because I don't know how to use one). I keep the screen brightness at max, and the screen is extremely high quality. I can see it clearly in bright daylight. I bought the accessory optical view finder and returned it. It doesn't really add that much. For some people it may and for them the OVF and EVF accessory is always available to purchase and if you have the disposable income to spend 2800$ on a camera, you can come up with the 600$ more for the view finder if for some reason you just can't live without the view finder.
Some people also complained about the battery not having an external charger. I like the fact because the premise of this camera is small and compact. it charges with a micro USB charger, which all android phones also charge through. You can use the same charger for your phone and your camera. Absolute worst come to worst, drop 40$ and buy yourself a spare battery and external charger.
Summary: Amazon takes returns no questions asked for 30 days. Buy it, and you'll see what I'm talking about.
Good Luck, and I hope it helps!
Note: I tried the sony wide angle converter, and fish eye lens on here. They DO fit on, but the images are unusable. That is unfortunate but its not a big deal, for reasons I mentioned above.
1) is it too expensive for what I'm getting?
2) will I be limited by 35mm focal length ?
3) is the auto-focus speed a problem ?
4) is there some other camera out there that is better than this one?
5) will I miss the view finder?
Here are the answers I have learned after buying this camera:
This camera is a game changing camera. The jpg files that come out of it, without editing are so delicious that it pretty much turns everyday snapshots into magic.
1) The cost is totally justified because of how great the images come out even before editing. The amount of flexibility in playing around with whats in focus on the full frame sensor, through this f 2.0 lens with crystal sharp clarity makes it worth it. The perfect ergonomics, and still fast shooting speed, and unequaled low light performance makes it worth it. The fact that its so small and light and can feasibly be carried everywhere with you at any time, makes it worth it.
2) for the first week, yes. After a week, no. You have to learn to move yourself around a little bit. If you can't take 2 steps forward or 2 steps backward, then move to a different angle. Your compositions will improve by learning this. Need to zoom in? no problem - this camera has digital zoom and you can zoom 200%. because its 24 mpx, its no problem at all. Need to take a huge landscape and wish you had a 10 mm wideangle on a full frame body? use panoramic mode and get the job done. for the 99% of pictures I take, with family and friends, doing cool things and living life? 35mm is perfect. Its not portrait photography and its not landscapes. Its portraits IN landscapes.
3) Auto-focus speed. I really think the complaints about this are ridiculous and stupid. In normal lighting, it is just as fast as my canon 5d. No thought need enter your mind about how long will the camera take to focus. You compose the pic, and push the button and it takes the picture. In VERY low light, like a dark restaurant with 1 candle in it, it will hunt for 0.5-1.5 seconds, and then lock on. I would like to remind those people, who are NOT taking life changing pictures 8 times every second of every day, that you can probably afford to hold the camera up for 1 second and let it lock on to the target. I'd also like to remind those people who don't have even 1 extra second, about what they are getting in exchange for that 1 second - they got to go out for the night carrying a tiny camera in their palm, which can shoot dslr quality photos, instead of a 5 pound DSLR rig with a 10 inch lens sticking out. For those whose life depends on trying to freeze frame a golf ball coming off the driver head in 1/10000 sec, at midnight, then yes, this is the wrong camera for you. While I'm on the issue of low light, try taking a picture of people in normal city lighting at night at 6400 iso and be amazed at how the picture glows and feel vibrant and alive.
4) in the market of small size cameras with full frame sensors and top quality lenses, well this camera has exactly Zero competitors. This is the only camera of its kind.
5) I haven't felt the lack of a view finder (not because I don't know how to use one). I keep the screen brightness at max, and the screen is extremely high quality. I can see it clearly in bright daylight. I bought the accessory optical view finder and returned it. It doesn't really add that much. For some people it may and for them the OVF and EVF accessory is always available to purchase and if you have the disposable income to spend 2800$ on a camera, you can come up with the 600$ more for the view finder if for some reason you just can't live without the view finder.
Some people also complained about the battery not having an external charger. I like the fact because the premise of this camera is small and compact. it charges with a micro USB charger, which all android phones also charge through. You can use the same charger for your phone and your camera. Absolute worst come to worst, drop 40$ and buy yourself a spare battery and external charger.
Summary: Amazon takes returns no questions asked for 30 days. Buy it, and you'll see what I'm talking about.
Good Luck, and I hope it helps!
Note: I tried the sony wide angle converter, and fish eye lens on here. They DO fit on, but the images are unusable. That is unfortunate but its not a big deal, for reasons I mentioned above.
Скроменый эксперт
12.03.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Super item, thicker than the usual film we buy to cover the face of our phones. I followed Michael Catbagon's very useful directions, and the cover mounted perfectly, without any bubbles or visual effects. I'll build on Michaels directions to make sure they as clear as possible.
1. Put the camera face down on something soft, like a thin cloth, on a flat surface like a table. Completely clean the screen with the microfiber cloth.
2. Note that the side of the protector with the black frame is the side that faces away from the camera, and the side with the yellow frame goes over the screen.
3. Peel the very thin plastic from the side with the yellow paper frame.
4. Before exposing the glue, which is under the yellow paper frame, practice placing the protector, yellow paper side down, thick edge to the right and thin edge to the left.
5. Peel off the yellow paper frame that covers the glue.
6. Holding the protector at a slight angle, touch one edge of the protector to the corresponding edge of the screen.
7. Don't press the center. Place the whole protector flat on the screen.
8. Inspect. If all looks right, no bubbles (and there were none in my case), press around the edge of the protector to set the glue.
9. Remember the glue will not necessarily set up and reach full strength immediately.
Good luck; certainly looks like a good item to have on our much loved Sony 100s.
2. Turn over the protector so that the yellow edge, not the black edge, faces up. The glue is under the yellow paper around the edge.
3. Peel off the very thin plastic that ensured the protector would arrive safely.
3. Before you peel off the yellow paper frame on the reverse, give the placement of the protector a couple of dry runs to make sure you will set it perfectly once the glue is exposed. Turn the protector over, so the top is
1. Put the camera face down on something soft, like a thin cloth, on a flat surface like a table. Completely clean the screen with the microfiber cloth.
2. Note that the side of the protector with the black frame is the side that faces away from the camera, and the side with the yellow frame goes over the screen.
3. Peel the very thin plastic from the side with the yellow paper frame.
4. Before exposing the glue, which is under the yellow paper frame, practice placing the protector, yellow paper side down, thick edge to the right and thin edge to the left.
5. Peel off the yellow paper frame that covers the glue.
6. Holding the protector at a slight angle, touch one edge of the protector to the corresponding edge of the screen.
7. Don't press the center. Place the whole protector flat on the screen.
8. Inspect. If all looks right, no bubbles (and there were none in my case), press around the edge of the protector to set the glue.
9. Remember the glue will not necessarily set up and reach full strength immediately.
Good luck; certainly looks like a good item to have on our much loved Sony 100s.
2. Turn over the protector so that the yellow edge, not the black edge, faces up. The glue is under the yellow paper around the edge.
3. Peel off the very thin plastic that ensured the protector would arrive safely.
3. Before you peel off the yellow paper frame on the reverse, give the placement of the protector a couple of dry runs to make sure you will set it perfectly once the glue is exposed. Turn the protector over, so the top is
Скроменый эксперт
21.08.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Other reviewers have already given an excellent detailed review of this camera, so I'll just add some thoughts.
Cost: some complain that it's expensive, but at 2800 it's about the same cost (or cheaper) than an FF camera and 35 mm lens.
Lens: The lens is a work of art. It's razor sharp at wide open, doesn't get soft around the edges... it's as good as any 35 mm lens available for full frame cameras, but it's only f/2.0. If you're looking for ultra-shallow DOF, look elsewhere. Another issue is if you chose to weld a single lens to a FF camera what would it be? For me, this camera was to be mostly for portraits, candids, travel and I think that 50mm would be a better choice, especially for portraits. I'm guessing Sony went through a lot of soul searching, and thought hard about their decision. But in the end I find myself shooting with my 50mm more than my 35mm on my mkII.
AF: Works great good light and high contrast situations. AF performance suffers in low light/low contrast: translation, photographs of people in suboptimal lighting conditions come out blurry more often than not. The performance of this camera vs a full-sized FF DSLR in bad light really shows the faults of its AF system. AF assist light is also very bright, and camera really can't focus without it in low light. Tracking moving people, objects, animals, etc. is also rudimentary and this is NOT a camera meant for taking any action photos. The poor performance of the AF is why I give this 3 stars. This camera just can't focus well except in the most ideal conditions.
ISO: The camera has great high ISO performance, with low noise, but in most situations your low light photography will be limited by the AF's inability to focus in low light.
Flash: There's a flash, it's there. If you really find yourself needing to use this camera with a flash, you probably need to get something else. It's acceptable in a pinch.
Design: There's no LVF, you have to buy one aftermarket, meaning you have to hold the camera at arm's length and use the LCD to compose. This isn't natural for anyone used to shooting a DSLR. Control points aren't that intuitive and Sony's menus aren't as user friendly as Nikon or Canon. Aside from the aperture ring, quickly changing settings while shooting is challenging. The camera is "compact" but it's a slim rectangle fused to a huge lens, so it's not pocketable and it will have to be worn around the neck/shoulder like a DSLR. The body has no real hand grip, and a bit slippery.
Sensor: Perfect. The photos this camera generates are gorgeous. If you take the time to compose your photos and get everything just right, the quality of the images is heartbreakingly good.
In short: I wanted this camera to be a portable replacement for an FF DSLR with prime lens. In good light, it takes better photos than my 5DmkII and Sigma 35mm. The quality of the RAWs is just gorgeous. The lens is razor sharp and is perfectly married to the body. The camera is smaller than a DSLR, but a DSLR with prime lens isn't that cumbersome to someone used to carrying one around. Shooting is awkward without an LVF, and Sony will gouge you if you want one. What really upset me is that the AF just can't cut it when photographing people in moderate to low light, and this is where this camera really suffers. This camera shines in good lighting, but it just can't do all the things I need it to do, and when it fails (low light) it can be very frustrating. And, ultimately, the cumbersome controls don't make up for its small size over a proper DSLR, making shooting more of a chore than it has to be. I'd like to revisit this idea if Sony ever wants to address some its faults, until then I think I'll just work on my Canon lens library.
Cost: some complain that it's expensive, but at 2800 it's about the same cost (or cheaper) than an FF camera and 35 mm lens.
Lens: The lens is a work of art. It's razor sharp at wide open, doesn't get soft around the edges... it's as good as any 35 mm lens available for full frame cameras, but it's only f/2.0. If you're looking for ultra-shallow DOF, look elsewhere. Another issue is if you chose to weld a single lens to a FF camera what would it be? For me, this camera was to be mostly for portraits, candids, travel and I think that 50mm would be a better choice, especially for portraits. I'm guessing Sony went through a lot of soul searching, and thought hard about their decision. But in the end I find myself shooting with my 50mm more than my 35mm on my mkII.
AF: Works great good light and high contrast situations. AF performance suffers in low light/low contrast: translation, photographs of people in suboptimal lighting conditions come out blurry more often than not. The performance of this camera vs a full-sized FF DSLR in bad light really shows the faults of its AF system. AF assist light is also very bright, and camera really can't focus without it in low light. Tracking moving people, objects, animals, etc. is also rudimentary and this is NOT a camera meant for taking any action photos. The poor performance of the AF is why I give this 3 stars. This camera just can't focus well except in the most ideal conditions.
ISO: The camera has great high ISO performance, with low noise, but in most situations your low light photography will be limited by the AF's inability to focus in low light.
Flash: There's a flash, it's there. If you really find yourself needing to use this camera with a flash, you probably need to get something else. It's acceptable in a pinch.
Design: There's no LVF, you have to buy one aftermarket, meaning you have to hold the camera at arm's length and use the LCD to compose. This isn't natural for anyone used to shooting a DSLR. Control points aren't that intuitive and Sony's menus aren't as user friendly as Nikon or Canon. Aside from the aperture ring, quickly changing settings while shooting is challenging. The camera is "compact" but it's a slim rectangle fused to a huge lens, so it's not pocketable and it will have to be worn around the neck/shoulder like a DSLR. The body has no real hand grip, and a bit slippery.
Sensor: Perfect. The photos this camera generates are gorgeous. If you take the time to compose your photos and get everything just right, the quality of the images is heartbreakingly good.
In short: I wanted this camera to be a portable replacement for an FF DSLR with prime lens. In good light, it takes better photos than my 5DmkII and Sigma 35mm. The quality of the RAWs is just gorgeous. The lens is razor sharp and is perfectly married to the body. The camera is smaller than a DSLR, but a DSLR with prime lens isn't that cumbersome to someone used to carrying one around. Shooting is awkward without an LVF, and Sony will gouge you if you want one. What really upset me is that the AF just can't cut it when photographing people in moderate to low light, and this is where this camera really suffers. This camera shines in good lighting, but it just can't do all the things I need it to do, and when it fails (low light) it can be very frustrating. And, ultimately, the cumbersome controls don't make up for its small size over a proper DSLR, making shooting more of a chore than it has to be. I'd like to revisit this idea if Sony ever wants to address some its faults, until then I think I'll just work on my Canon lens library.
Скроменый эксперт
03.06.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
It's a great camera with a mostly fantastic build quality. I won't dwell too much on the many things I love about this camera, it's been well covered in these reviews already. Suffice it to say the lens and the sensor are expertly matched. I've never had pictures that correlate so closely to my mind's eye, to my memories of scenes and events past. They say the eye sees somewhere around 45mm, but I'm almost certain the heart and mind remember everything in 35. And as 35mm lenses go, this is among the best ever produced. For this reason alone it's worth the price to me. The controls are also well placed. When you have time to setup a shot - and you're not relying on the autofocus - it handles like a dream. But as much as I love this camera, it's far from perfect.
Firstly, there's some evidence of Sony having skimped on a few of the pieces and dials, manufacturing them out of plastic where they should have used metal (for example on the battery door, and rear jog dial). This is strange and breaks the spell of an otherwise brilliant design. The lack of weather sealing is also a real concern if, like me, you sometimes shoot in the rain - but these are forgivable shortcomings. More forgivable than the cheap build quality and poor design of the optional digital viewfinder (FDAEV1MK)- which despite all the downsides is still a must-have accessory.
Another sore point has to be the incredibly poor focus system, which has suffered without a single firmware update to address it over the life of this camera (as of June, 2014). This says something strange about the software culture inside of Sony. I can only speculate that the CyberShot team apparently has fewer resources available compared to other imaging teams. Or maybe they're busy working on the RX2. Either way, it's a shame to see a camera this expensive (and yet popular!) be set out to pasture so soon. Sony should take a page out of Apple's book and show more love for current owners.
Lastly, it might be worthwhile to underline the lackluster battery life - though it's a niggle easily mitigated by the purchase of a few extra batteries. I'd strongly recommend you do NOT leave the house for any length of time with less than 3 fully charged batteries. I'd recommend you stick with Sony's NP-BX1, and do not go out of your way to try and save a few dollars on something this important after dropping so much money on the camera itself.
I also want to recommend the half-case made by Ulysses, a company based in Japan, which is excellent. Their website is a little hard to find, last time I visited it was sort of run on Facebook - but their RX1/R case is really well made, features a clean and functional design with an integrated grip, which greatly improves the handling.
Firstly, there's some evidence of Sony having skimped on a few of the pieces and dials, manufacturing them out of plastic where they should have used metal (for example on the battery door, and rear jog dial). This is strange and breaks the spell of an otherwise brilliant design. The lack of weather sealing is also a real concern if, like me, you sometimes shoot in the rain - but these are forgivable shortcomings. More forgivable than the cheap build quality and poor design of the optional digital viewfinder (FDAEV1MK)- which despite all the downsides is still a must-have accessory.
Another sore point has to be the incredibly poor focus system, which has suffered without a single firmware update to address it over the life of this camera (as of June, 2014). This says something strange about the software culture inside of Sony. I can only speculate that the CyberShot team apparently has fewer resources available compared to other imaging teams. Or maybe they're busy working on the RX2. Either way, it's a shame to see a camera this expensive (and yet popular!) be set out to pasture so soon. Sony should take a page out of Apple's book and show more love for current owners.
Lastly, it might be worthwhile to underline the lackluster battery life - though it's a niggle easily mitigated by the purchase of a few extra batteries. I'd strongly recommend you do NOT leave the house for any length of time with less than 3 fully charged batteries. I'd recommend you stick with Sony's NP-BX1, and do not go out of your way to try and save a few dollars on something this important after dropping so much money on the camera itself.
I also want to recommend the half-case made by Ulysses, a company based in Japan, which is excellent. Their website is a little hard to find, last time I visited it was sort of run on Facebook - but their RX1/R case is really well made, features a clean and functional design with an integrated grip, which greatly improves the handling.
Скроменый эксперт
14.09.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This camera is a little treasure, I bring it to events, concerts, music festivals, and other venues where you can photograph interesting people but cannot lug around a 5DmkIII, and its results are quite comparable! A camera is only as good as it is being used, and the problem with the 5DmkIII's and the D800's and the A7R II's out there is that, unless you're a professional photographer being paid to shoot an event/wedding/portrait, you will not take these cameras anywhere with you, and their awesomeness will stay home collecting dust. I take 5 times the amount of photos that I used to take with my DSLR (which I sold, thankfully). This one carries a hefty pricetag (just like they do) but it will give your photography that extra umph that you cannot get with any other portable camera (except the Leica Q, for $1500 more and not that nice focal length - 35mm on a FF is more than enough wide, and 28mm means you can't use the Q for anything other than landscape). \
Скроменый эксперт
08.04.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Would I pay full price for this camera? No way! I won it in an auction for an awesome price, a tad bit lower than what you can get it for on ebay used. So why would I say that? Well, for 2700, one would expect the autofocus to be much better. It's auto focus is slower than the NEX-6, and the accuracy of the camera nails it's focus 50% of the time. That's a bummer. I was going to trade this bad boy in for the A7II, but I would have to shell out an extra grand for it to include the 55 1.8, so I decided not to. So what do you do when you get to know a camera's limits, you learn to work around it. You will find ways to use the tool and make it work to your advantage. The biggest upside to this camera is it's picture quality. The F2 will give you nice creamy bokeh and the zeiss lens is sharp. The detail on this lens is amazing. You will enjoy it if you're a pixel peeper.
Another thing about this camera is the grip, it will fall off your hands easily. So what I did was I bought the fotodiox grip for it. Totally worth it.
So, is it worth the price. I'd say no. Not unless they update the firmware, add faster autofocus, and add sony apps. Wifi feature would've been a nice addition too.
I really wanted to love the camera...but after using it for a while, I just feel like it's missing too much. So I gave it 4 stars because it's an awesome camera for the price I got it for but missing a lot. For 2700, I'd say get something else.
Another thing about this camera is the grip, it will fall off your hands easily. So what I did was I bought the fotodiox grip for it. Totally worth it.
So, is it worth the price. I'd say no. Not unless they update the firmware, add faster autofocus, and add sony apps. Wifi feature would've been a nice addition too.
I really wanted to love the camera...but after using it for a while, I just feel like it's missing too much. So I gave it 4 stars because it's an awesome camera for the price I got it for but missing a lot. For 2700, I'd say get something else.
Скроменый эксперт
25.12.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
let me get this out of the way, If I were basing this camera solely on image quality, sharpness and high ISO performance, I would have given this camera a solid 5 stars!! The images that come up on my screen are so razor sharp that it completely annihilates my Nikon D700 DSLR. As a matter of fact, the resolution of the images from the RX1 make the Nikon D700 images look like it came from a point and shoot, ironic isn't it?
I was expecting a slight increase in resolution in the RX1, but I certainly wasn't ready for the huge advantage that the Rx1 held over the Nikon D700 in resolution. The high ISO performance WOW! I can shoot all the way up to 12,000 ISO and be confident that the file will hold up in post. The build quality is beautiful!! Every button and dial is tight, solid and purposeful on this camera. Sony wanted to make a statement with the RX1. They wanted to announce to the Nikon/Canon giants that they are here to seduce their market share into a tighter, sexier photographic package, and they might even seduce some of the Leica users into their world.
I love the customization options of the buttons. I have the left button assigned to ISO, the right button assigned to Quality, the down button assigned to WB, and the C button assigned to focus modes. This is a hugely customizable camera and one that can adapt to a wide range of user preferences. Bravo Sony!
Okay so let's get to the nasty bits of the camera.
Sony wanted to make an engineering statement, but they went a little overboard. They sacrificed ergonomics, and a viewfinder just for the sake of showing off the sizable miniaturization of this camera. I have fairly small hands and I find it very awkward to hold the camera. Most of the weight, about 70 percent of it, is built into the beautiful Zeiss lens. The body feels like it's a light weight and feels disproportionately weighted to the lens. Consequently, the camera feels very front heavy and requires quite a bit of squeezing on the grip to feel that it's not going to dive bomb onto the concrete below. I really hope someone comes out with a grip that can negate the disproportionate weight balance of this camera, and simultaneously offer a larger grip area.
Where's the Viewfinder? Again, I know that Sony wanted to make this camera as small as possible, but the lack of viewfinder really saddens me. Adding insult to injury, Sony wants to charge $450.00 for an electronic viewfinder that should have been included in the first place. The bigger joke here is that the Zeiss optical viewfinder is selling for $600.00, I seriously see low sales for the optical viewfinder. However, I have to state that shooting with the LCD screen has been okay and I have not really missed any shots because of the lack of a viewfinder.
The lens is brilliantly contrasty, renders colors vividly and truly gives punchy results with awesome micro contrast and beautiful Bokeh. However, I feel that the Zeiss lens is always "cranked to 11" and lacks some of the subtle tonality rendering nuances of the Leica equivalents. However.... the Leica 35mm Summicron is over 3K and is not as sharp as the one on the Sony, so I will gladly accept this as a fact of life. The Zeiss Lens is so sharp that it can excite aliasing/moire artifacts ;even with the inclusion of an AA filter infront of the camera sensor. I have to wonder how much more detail the camera sensor would capture if Sony decided to forgo the AA filter.
Finally, the biggest flaw that I can see with this camera is that there is some distortion present with the 35mm Zeiss Lens. Yes it can be fixed in post production, yes you can select an option in-camera to fix the distortion, but lines and faces still look a bit "wavy" in the corners of the image.
It may seem that I'm being overly harsh on the camera, but with all the negatives that I have stated, I still LOVE the RX!!!!! There is nothing else like it on the market and it gives me beautiful images fast and easy. The RAW files are flexible and seem to have infinite detail in the shadows begging to be pulled out of the abyss. I just hope that Sony makes future iterations of this camera with better weight distribution, less distortion in the lens and a built-in viewfinder. Thanks for reading :)
I was expecting a slight increase in resolution in the RX1, but I certainly wasn't ready for the huge advantage that the Rx1 held over the Nikon D700 in resolution. The high ISO performance WOW! I can shoot all the way up to 12,000 ISO and be confident that the file will hold up in post. The build quality is beautiful!! Every button and dial is tight, solid and purposeful on this camera. Sony wanted to make a statement with the RX1. They wanted to announce to the Nikon/Canon giants that they are here to seduce their market share into a tighter, sexier photographic package, and they might even seduce some of the Leica users into their world.
I love the customization options of the buttons. I have the left button assigned to ISO, the right button assigned to Quality, the down button assigned to WB, and the C button assigned to focus modes. This is a hugely customizable camera and one that can adapt to a wide range of user preferences. Bravo Sony!
Okay so let's get to the nasty bits of the camera.
Sony wanted to make an engineering statement, but they went a little overboard. They sacrificed ergonomics, and a viewfinder just for the sake of showing off the sizable miniaturization of this camera. I have fairly small hands and I find it very awkward to hold the camera. Most of the weight, about 70 percent of it, is built into the beautiful Zeiss lens. The body feels like it's a light weight and feels disproportionately weighted to the lens. Consequently, the camera feels very front heavy and requires quite a bit of squeezing on the grip to feel that it's not going to dive bomb onto the concrete below. I really hope someone comes out with a grip that can negate the disproportionate weight balance of this camera, and simultaneously offer a larger grip area.
Where's the Viewfinder? Again, I know that Sony wanted to make this camera as small as possible, but the lack of viewfinder really saddens me. Adding insult to injury, Sony wants to charge $450.00 for an electronic viewfinder that should have been included in the first place. The bigger joke here is that the Zeiss optical viewfinder is selling for $600.00, I seriously see low sales for the optical viewfinder. However, I have to state that shooting with the LCD screen has been okay and I have not really missed any shots because of the lack of a viewfinder.
The lens is brilliantly contrasty, renders colors vividly and truly gives punchy results with awesome micro contrast and beautiful Bokeh. However, I feel that the Zeiss lens is always "cranked to 11" and lacks some of the subtle tonality rendering nuances of the Leica equivalents. However.... the Leica 35mm Summicron is over 3K and is not as sharp as the one on the Sony, so I will gladly accept this as a fact of life. The Zeiss Lens is so sharp that it can excite aliasing/moire artifacts ;even with the inclusion of an AA filter infront of the camera sensor. I have to wonder how much more detail the camera sensor would capture if Sony decided to forgo the AA filter.
Finally, the biggest flaw that I can see with this camera is that there is some distortion present with the 35mm Zeiss Lens. Yes it can be fixed in post production, yes you can select an option in-camera to fix the distortion, but lines and faces still look a bit "wavy" in the corners of the image.
It may seem that I'm being overly harsh on the camera, but with all the negatives that I have stated, I still LOVE the RX!!!!! There is nothing else like it on the market and it gives me beautiful images fast and easy. The RAW files are flexible and seem to have infinite detail in the shadows begging to be pulled out of the abyss. I just hope that Sony makes future iterations of this camera with better weight distribution, less distortion in the lens and a built-in viewfinder. Thanks for reading :)
Скроменый эксперт
20.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The first feeling I had when I first held the RX1 was underwhelmed. After a few minutes of shooting, I realized it's because I had fallen victim to the hype about cameras that can sometimes make you think that a camera will just, "Make good pictures." I had been anxiously awaiting the chance to use it and expected the first photo to just jump off the screen and knock my socks off! But it didn't. Because it was a snapshot in fluorescent light. Every camera is capable of making good pictures. But you still have to be the one building them.
However, when I got to spend a week with it starting a few days later, my impressions were very different. The feel, look, image quality, and ergonomics are absolutely wonderful. In fact, I would put them as close to perfect as any camera I've used, and I have used a lot of them both as a working photographer and camera salesperson.
I, like a lot of people, have been searching for a small camera with good image quality for years. I've gone back and forth on little Rollei film cameras, I've strongly considered the NEX-6, RX100, XE-1, S95, etc. But, having shot with a canon full frame SLR for about 4 years, I could never pull the trigger on buying a camera that could not be used professionally (within reason), and would sacrifice some low-light/background blur/image quality. The RX1 (which I accidentally just typed as RX!--a fitting name, haha) finally fills that spot perfectly. It is as small as I would ever imagine a full frame digital camera and lens combo could be. Easily jacket-pocket-sized.
The camera is truly wonderful to use. There are so many customizable buttons that I have a button for everything I use, and for the first time since I switched to digital, one of them is not ISO. I leave it on Auto ISO 100-25,600, and I don't even think about it. In color with all NR turned off, the luminance noise is very film-like, though there is some chroma noise (very easily removed in PS). In black and white, ISO 25,600 is genuinely printable at 8x12" (possibly further, though I hadn't tried).
There are small issues, though. For example, the trash can button doesn't do anything while shooting, which is sad, because it would be nice to be able to customize that. But that is the level of issues we're talking about. This camera is a revolution, so I'll spot them a few bugs. Every new Canon and Nikon has issues too, expect those are refreshes of cameras that already exist. This is the only thing like this ever. So I'll deal.
If you are still reading this, you are likely someone who is seriously considering the camera. I have two final things to say to you:
1. If you are unsure, rent it. There is a very reputable site where one can rent lenses... or cameras. Try it out. I have had it for a week, and I am actually waiting for an email back from the rental place to see if I can keep it longer. I've never loved shooting a camera more than this. Canon 6D, Nikon D600, D800 -- they are lovely cameras that do their jobs very effectively. But if I didn't shoot weddings, and I just wanted one camera, this would certainly be it. I just shoot all the time with it. But, if you want to take a portrait from 6 ft away, this isn't the camera. It is a 35mm, and that's just fine -- your phone doesn't zoom either, but it never stops you from taking pictures with it.
2. You have also, no doubt, read the review done by the Internet's most prolific and pompous camera "expert" and "artist." Please ignore him. He doesn't like it because "the colors are too green" and he can't figure out how to add tint to WB (press right when you're on WB...), and also that on AUTO the camera chooses f/4 instead of f/2.This can also easily be fixed by SHOOTING IN APERTURE PRIORITY. Meanwhile, there is nothing else like this camera in the world! It is a pleasure to use, and constantly gives me exactly what I want. It is a pocketable full frame camera with a Zeiss 35mm f/2 lens that is JUST AS SHARP at f/2 as it is at f/5.6, and is usable at every ISO, for what is normally just the price of a much bigger camera.
This camera is incredible. Get it in your hands for a few days and you'll understand. Steve Huff is completely right.
However, when I got to spend a week with it starting a few days later, my impressions were very different. The feel, look, image quality, and ergonomics are absolutely wonderful. In fact, I would put them as close to perfect as any camera I've used, and I have used a lot of them both as a working photographer and camera salesperson.
I, like a lot of people, have been searching for a small camera with good image quality for years. I've gone back and forth on little Rollei film cameras, I've strongly considered the NEX-6, RX100, XE-1, S95, etc. But, having shot with a canon full frame SLR for about 4 years, I could never pull the trigger on buying a camera that could not be used professionally (within reason), and would sacrifice some low-light/background blur/image quality. The RX1 (which I accidentally just typed as RX!--a fitting name, haha) finally fills that spot perfectly. It is as small as I would ever imagine a full frame digital camera and lens combo could be. Easily jacket-pocket-sized.
The camera is truly wonderful to use. There are so many customizable buttons that I have a button for everything I use, and for the first time since I switched to digital, one of them is not ISO. I leave it on Auto ISO 100-25,600, and I don't even think about it. In color with all NR turned off, the luminance noise is very film-like, though there is some chroma noise (very easily removed in PS). In black and white, ISO 25,600 is genuinely printable at 8x12" (possibly further, though I hadn't tried).
There are small issues, though. For example, the trash can button doesn't do anything while shooting, which is sad, because it would be nice to be able to customize that. But that is the level of issues we're talking about. This camera is a revolution, so I'll spot them a few bugs. Every new Canon and Nikon has issues too, expect those are refreshes of cameras that already exist. This is the only thing like this ever. So I'll deal.
If you are still reading this, you are likely someone who is seriously considering the camera. I have two final things to say to you:
1. If you are unsure, rent it. There is a very reputable site where one can rent lenses... or cameras. Try it out. I have had it for a week, and I am actually waiting for an email back from the rental place to see if I can keep it longer. I've never loved shooting a camera more than this. Canon 6D, Nikon D600, D800 -- they are lovely cameras that do their jobs very effectively. But if I didn't shoot weddings, and I just wanted one camera, this would certainly be it. I just shoot all the time with it. But, if you want to take a portrait from 6 ft away, this isn't the camera. It is a 35mm, and that's just fine -- your phone doesn't zoom either, but it never stops you from taking pictures with it.
2. You have also, no doubt, read the review done by the Internet's most prolific and pompous camera "expert" and "artist." Please ignore him. He doesn't like it because "the colors are too green" and he can't figure out how to add tint to WB (press right when you're on WB...), and also that on AUTO the camera chooses f/4 instead of f/2.This can also easily be fixed by SHOOTING IN APERTURE PRIORITY. Meanwhile, there is nothing else like this camera in the world! It is a pleasure to use, and constantly gives me exactly what I want. It is a pocketable full frame camera with a Zeiss 35mm f/2 lens that is JUST AS SHARP at f/2 as it is at f/5.6, and is usable at every ISO, for what is normally just the price of a much bigger camera.
This camera is incredible. Get it in your hands for a few days and you'll understand. Steve Huff is completely right.
Скроменый эксперт
05.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
As one of the three reviewers here so far that actually own the camera I would like to point out that first and foremost I have to say that this is definitely not a camera for hobbyists. Absurdly and with much amusement I have read several complaints here regarding the camera from people that have a) never touched the thing, b) have no intention whatsoever in buying it and c) lack the knowledge or experience in photography that Sony had in mind when developing and releasing this camera, a world's first. Nothing like it has ever existed before.
This is a niche product, let me say that again, this is a niche product.
- no, it doesn't have an articulated screen.
- no, it doesn't automatically upload to facebook via wifi.
- no, you don't get a one year subscription to cheezburger or lolcatz.
- no, it's not bundled with a "Sony RX1 for Dummies"
- no, you have to buy the accessories, it's not like that 100 piece tool kit on QVC for $49.99
- no, it doesn't have a f1.2 lens (anyone that has seen size of the canon 35mm f1.4 or Canon 85mm f1.2 would immediately understand why Sony went with a f2 lens).
- no, you can't change the lens (Cartier-Bresson shot with one lens his whole life: a 50mm. Well, okay, the rest of us like options but this is not a deal breaker at all for me, 35mm is considered a standard lens on a 35mm camera). The Mamiya 6 was also a fixed lens camera and immensely popular.
What it is however, is the world's first full 35mm frame, leaf shutter (can sync at 1/4000s, let's see Canon or Nikon accomplish that) compact camera in the world Considering that the lens would retail for about $2,300 by itself, I'm assuming that Sony is betting that they will make up in volume what they are losing in cost on the body and sensor.
I'm a professional photographer and I bought this as a backup to my Canon 5D MKII, my other digital camera is a Phase One 645DF with a P65+ back and the Schneider 55mm & 85mm LS lenses.
Having just unboxed my new RX1, I have to say that my first impressions were that it reminded me slightly of my Leica M6 in heft and feel. Also, the slightly rounded edges only supported this sensation. Sony might or might of done this deliberately but I'm sure aren't complaining if the comparison is raised. I've only just started shooting some samples but so far I found the Carl Zeiss lens to be sharper and tonally smoother than my Canon 35mm f1.4L lens, which is pretty impressive to say the least. Highlight blooming is also less.
I only shoot RAW and the Sony format of ARW 2.3 will as Steve Huff pointed out stymie a lot of software. So far I have not had any problems opening it Capture One Pro 7.0.1 which is a relief as the Sony image conversion software is extremely poor. I rarely use on camera flash but the RX1's built in flash appeared to me to have better coverage than my previous Sony NEX-7.
In my opinion this also is definitely not a pocket camera, it's just too bulky. Again, it's not a deal breaker for me. I bought this purely for when I'm not working and for a backup to my Canon 5D MKII. I've yet to compare the low light capabilities with my 5D but Steve Huff did a great job over on his blog with similar cameras. I have not tried to digital zoom however, haven't touched it. I've always ascribed to Robert Capa's maxim: "If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough."
In my opinion the quality of the optics, the size of the sensor and the form factor of the camera will allow anyone using it to produce images that simply will stand out from other compact cameras.
Lastly, the second I unbox any camera I immediately put a UV filter on it. I highly recommend B+W filters as you can see here.
B+W 49mm XS-Pro Clear UV Haze with Multi-Resistant Nano Coating (010M)
**UPDATE**
I erroneously stated that Photoshop CS6 camera raw 7.2 can open these files, this is not the case sadly. The only software that I have found that can convert the ARW files is the latest version of Capture One Pro (version 7.0.1)
This is a niche product, let me say that again, this is a niche product.
- no, it doesn't have an articulated screen.
- no, it doesn't automatically upload to facebook via wifi.
- no, you don't get a one year subscription to cheezburger or lolcatz.
- no, it's not bundled with a "Sony RX1 for Dummies"
- no, you have to buy the accessories, it's not like that 100 piece tool kit on QVC for $49.99
- no, it doesn't have a f1.2 lens (anyone that has seen size of the canon 35mm f1.4 or Canon 85mm f1.2 would immediately understand why Sony went with a f2 lens).
- no, you can't change the lens (Cartier-Bresson shot with one lens his whole life: a 50mm. Well, okay, the rest of us like options but this is not a deal breaker at all for me, 35mm is considered a standard lens on a 35mm camera). The Mamiya 6 was also a fixed lens camera and immensely popular.
What it is however, is the world's first full 35mm frame, leaf shutter (can sync at 1/4000s, let's see Canon or Nikon accomplish that) compact camera in the world Considering that the lens would retail for about $2,300 by itself, I'm assuming that Sony is betting that they will make up in volume what they are losing in cost on the body and sensor.
I'm a professional photographer and I bought this as a backup to my Canon 5D MKII, my other digital camera is a Phase One 645DF with a P65+ back and the Schneider 55mm & 85mm LS lenses.
Having just unboxed my new RX1, I have to say that my first impressions were that it reminded me slightly of my Leica M6 in heft and feel. Also, the slightly rounded edges only supported this sensation. Sony might or might of done this deliberately but I'm sure aren't complaining if the comparison is raised. I've only just started shooting some samples but so far I found the Carl Zeiss lens to be sharper and tonally smoother than my Canon 35mm f1.4L lens, which is pretty impressive to say the least. Highlight blooming is also less.
I only shoot RAW and the Sony format of ARW 2.3 will as Steve Huff pointed out stymie a lot of software. So far I have not had any problems opening it Capture One Pro 7.0.1 which is a relief as the Sony image conversion software is extremely poor. I rarely use on camera flash but the RX1's built in flash appeared to me to have better coverage than my previous Sony NEX-7.
In my opinion this also is definitely not a pocket camera, it's just too bulky. Again, it's not a deal breaker for me. I bought this purely for when I'm not working and for a backup to my Canon 5D MKII. I've yet to compare the low light capabilities with my 5D but Steve Huff did a great job over on his blog with similar cameras. I have not tried to digital zoom however, haven't touched it. I've always ascribed to Robert Capa's maxim: "If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough."
In my opinion the quality of the optics, the size of the sensor and the form factor of the camera will allow anyone using it to produce images that simply will stand out from other compact cameras.
Lastly, the second I unbox any camera I immediately put a UV filter on it. I highly recommend B+W filters as you can see here.
B+W 49mm XS-Pro Clear UV Haze with Multi-Resistant Nano Coating (010M)
**UPDATE**
I erroneously stated that Photoshop CS6 camera raw 7.2 can open these files, this is not the case sadly. The only software that I have found that can convert the ARW files is the latest version of Capture One Pro (version 7.0.1)
Скроменый эксперт
19.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I am NOT a pro, so take this for what it's worth. I bought the first revolutionary digital camera ever in 2007, the Nikon D3 12mpx and shot up to 25600 ISO. Fast forward to 2013, and I bought the second revolutionary camera, the Sony DSC-RX1!!! It's all that and a bag of chips!!!
In between 2007 to 2013, I dropped about $30K on DSLR stuff. Then, I realized one day that I'm not paparazzi trying to get a close up shot of Jennifer Aniston in a thong, and I don't shoot F-1's races at 250 mph. So, in one fell swoop, I sold off ALL of my DSLR gear and bought the Leica M9-P and gathered up some M lenses (the Lux 35 and 50 ASPH, and the Cron 90). Happily on my way to complete freedom and bliss with a preorder in for the M type 240, until Sony released the RX1!!! I couldn't see dropping $3K for a P&S from Sony, to boot, who has had all sorts of QC problems with their consumer electronics. But this was different. For one, it was made in Japan, not elsewhere in Asia. Second, I read just about every review I could read or watch on the Internet, and talked to the guys at B&H, Adorama, etc. In the end, I felt this was too much to pass up, so I bit at the chance when I could get a discount on this bad boy.
This camera does NOT limit me. It liberates me. I can say with 100% confidence that there is no camera that can best this beast for image IQ, at any ISO in its range!!! And I can fit it into my winter coat pocket!!! Now, I don't fall in love easily and when I do, I don't have blinders on. Yes, its accessories are ridiculous in price ... a hood for $180 made in Japan? Why? The EVF is hideous on top of the camera and $450 also made in Japan? The AF is sluggish compared to the OM-D E-M5 but fast compared to my Leica M9-P (it's a joke). I used the Fujifilm X-Pro1 with the updated FW and the RX1 is faster IMHO. The colors are FLAT and nowhere near my Leica, but I have to tweak my Leica's colors too, which is why I shoot in RAW and adjust later. I also wished that Sony would better implement the focus peaking for normal mode, not just magnified mode, but that may be fixable in a FW update. All this bad, yet let me say this again ... there is NO CAMERA that exists that can best the image IQ from this little (just bigger than) P&S camera. Combined with the fixed Zeiss lens with 2.0 aperture, this is a GEM!!! It is REVOLUTIONARY as much today as the D3 was in 2007!!! I am liberated from thinking about whether I have the right equipment for the situation. I just take my RX1 and go and it FORCES me to frame my picture. It forces me to reconfigure the image in my head, and consider the picture before I just ham handed press the COMPLETELY SILENT shutter. And the fact that you can customize the D-pad, well that just keeps me out of Sony's messed up menu layout but is genius!!! Is my Leica M type 240 still en route to me??? YES YES YES. Do I now have an ample lieutenant on hand in the RX1??? ABSOLUTELY YES!!!
In my mind, there is ONLY ONE OPEN QUESTION and that is whether Sony can deliver on QC. If it's built as well as it seems holding it in one hand, then this is a DIAMOND. DO NOT dismiss this camera until you use it ... I also thought it would go back but it's here to stay for good!!! Now, when I travel, I drop my Leica M9-P with the 90 Cron (big lens for Leica M lenses) and yes, the RX1 or as I now affectionately refer to it as my little wonder!!! 35mm f2.0 Zeiss with a ridiculously good sensor, and 90mm f2.0 Cron is TOTAL FREEDOM. Yes, CaNikon can keep their hundreds of pounds of gear!!! If you're in the market for the most remarkable camera to date, then pony up and get this bad boy b/c Sony hit this ball back back back to the wall, and ... It's GONE!!! Not a grand slam but a HR!!!
In between 2007 to 2013, I dropped about $30K on DSLR stuff. Then, I realized one day that I'm not paparazzi trying to get a close up shot of Jennifer Aniston in a thong, and I don't shoot F-1's races at 250 mph. So, in one fell swoop, I sold off ALL of my DSLR gear and bought the Leica M9-P and gathered up some M lenses (the Lux 35 and 50 ASPH, and the Cron 90). Happily on my way to complete freedom and bliss with a preorder in for the M type 240, until Sony released the RX1!!! I couldn't see dropping $3K for a P&S from Sony, to boot, who has had all sorts of QC problems with their consumer electronics. But this was different. For one, it was made in Japan, not elsewhere in Asia. Second, I read just about every review I could read or watch on the Internet, and talked to the guys at B&H, Adorama, etc. In the end, I felt this was too much to pass up, so I bit at the chance when I could get a discount on this bad boy.
This camera does NOT limit me. It liberates me. I can say with 100% confidence that there is no camera that can best this beast for image IQ, at any ISO in its range!!! And I can fit it into my winter coat pocket!!! Now, I don't fall in love easily and when I do, I don't have blinders on. Yes, its accessories are ridiculous in price ... a hood for $180 made in Japan? Why? The EVF is hideous on top of the camera and $450 also made in Japan? The AF is sluggish compared to the OM-D E-M5 but fast compared to my Leica M9-P (it's a joke). I used the Fujifilm X-Pro1 with the updated FW and the RX1 is faster IMHO. The colors are FLAT and nowhere near my Leica, but I have to tweak my Leica's colors too, which is why I shoot in RAW and adjust later. I also wished that Sony would better implement the focus peaking for normal mode, not just magnified mode, but that may be fixable in a FW update. All this bad, yet let me say this again ... there is NO CAMERA that exists that can best the image IQ from this little (just bigger than) P&S camera. Combined with the fixed Zeiss lens with 2.0 aperture, this is a GEM!!! It is REVOLUTIONARY as much today as the D3 was in 2007!!! I am liberated from thinking about whether I have the right equipment for the situation. I just take my RX1 and go and it FORCES me to frame my picture. It forces me to reconfigure the image in my head, and consider the picture before I just ham handed press the COMPLETELY SILENT shutter. And the fact that you can customize the D-pad, well that just keeps me out of Sony's messed up menu layout but is genius!!! Is my Leica M type 240 still en route to me??? YES YES YES. Do I now have an ample lieutenant on hand in the RX1??? ABSOLUTELY YES!!!
In my mind, there is ONLY ONE OPEN QUESTION and that is whether Sony can deliver on QC. If it's built as well as it seems holding it in one hand, then this is a DIAMOND. DO NOT dismiss this camera until you use it ... I also thought it would go back but it's here to stay for good!!! Now, when I travel, I drop my Leica M9-P with the 90 Cron (big lens for Leica M lenses) and yes, the RX1 or as I now affectionately refer to it as my little wonder!!! 35mm f2.0 Zeiss with a ridiculously good sensor, and 90mm f2.0 Cron is TOTAL FREEDOM. Yes, CaNikon can keep their hundreds of pounds of gear!!! If you're in the market for the most remarkable camera to date, then pony up and get this bad boy b/c Sony hit this ball back back back to the wall, and ... It's GONE!!! Not a grand slam but a HR!!!
Скроменый эксперт
10.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The RX1 has one of the top sensors of all time. It also has one of the best (if not the best) 35mm FF lenses of all time. They provide a one-two punch capable of producing the best photography (from a technical perspective) ever, to date. Of course, ultimately it is the photographer that makes a photo. A great photographer can make a great photo with a camera phone. A rookie photographer surely can take thousands of crappy photos with this camera.
The build quality is exceptional. Basically all is magnesium, rubber or glass, except for the battery door and plug input door, which are plastic. It feels like a brick, which is good to help stabilize the hold. It has no image stabilization, but most lenses of 35mm or shorter do not. The P and A buttons typically settle on 1/80 shutter speed. Generally that is good enough. However there is no minimum shutter speed setting. The work-around is to work in M mode, set shutter speed to 1/100 or 1/125 or more and leave on Auto ISO and then set the aperture ring (which is on the lens) to whatever you want to compose the picture. The camera has amazing ISO noise control up to the default 6400 ISO so this manual mode technique can be quite effective most of the time except in bright light, when you have to be a bit more active controlling the shutter speed dial. The MF, AF and DMF (AF w/ MF override when shutter release is half depressed) knob is on the front of the camera. PASM and Exposure Correction knobs are on top. Shutter dial is on the back up top + a bunch of programmable buttons and thumb dial are on back. Enormous amount of customization is possible.
The menu is quite intuitive and is modeled after that of the Sony Alpha DSLRs. The LCD is quite bright with very high resolution. Battery life is so-so, generally allowing 150 - 200 images between charges. It also has a pop up flash. However, due to the bright lens and great noise handling characteristics at high ISO, the flash may rarely be needed. The RAW files produced are exceptional providing magnificent Dynamic Range. There is tremendous resolution from the 24.3MP sensor... and combine that, once again, with that beautiful extremely sharp lens with creamy bokeh and amazing images can be produced.
The RX1 fits a very specific need... someone that uses and appreciates the 35mm Full Frame focal length, is seeking incredible Image Quality in a very small form factor. If you are not a real photo enthusiast you will find the very short depth of field (at f/2) a challenge to focus. This camera has CDAF technology like most mirrorless cameras. The shallow DOF further exposes the limitations of CDAF for auto-focusing if the subject is not fairly still. If you are aware of this fact before buying, it is a camera limitation you learn to work with. All cameras have limitations. The other obvious limitation is it is a fixed lens. If you want an amazing IQ small camera with a 35mm focal length because you either want it on you most of the time or you travel a lot... or you just love photographing with 35mm on non-active subjects... and if you do indoor photography a lot and need a bright lens with a camera sensor that has amazing noise handling, the RX1 may be the camera for you. It is a very unique type of camera and has the potential to be a classic. It also has the potential to hold its value for a long time. "Potential" does not mean "definitely"
If you think you are buying an amazing point and shoot Cybershot to photograph your young children DO NOT BUY THIS CAMERA. The auto-focus will disappoint unless you know you have the skill to photograph young children with manual focus (which, by the way, while the lens is focus by wire, it is smooth and buttery with just the right resistance on the RX1).
The RX1 is 3 thumbs up if you are the right individual with the right unique needs.
The build quality is exceptional. Basically all is magnesium, rubber or glass, except for the battery door and plug input door, which are plastic. It feels like a brick, which is good to help stabilize the hold. It has no image stabilization, but most lenses of 35mm or shorter do not. The P and A buttons typically settle on 1/80 shutter speed. Generally that is good enough. However there is no minimum shutter speed setting. The work-around is to work in M mode, set shutter speed to 1/100 or 1/125 or more and leave on Auto ISO and then set the aperture ring (which is on the lens) to whatever you want to compose the picture. The camera has amazing ISO noise control up to the default 6400 ISO so this manual mode technique can be quite effective most of the time except in bright light, when you have to be a bit more active controlling the shutter speed dial. The MF, AF and DMF (AF w/ MF override when shutter release is half depressed) knob is on the front of the camera. PASM and Exposure Correction knobs are on top. Shutter dial is on the back up top + a bunch of programmable buttons and thumb dial are on back. Enormous amount of customization is possible.
The menu is quite intuitive and is modeled after that of the Sony Alpha DSLRs. The LCD is quite bright with very high resolution. Battery life is so-so, generally allowing 150 - 200 images between charges. It also has a pop up flash. However, due to the bright lens and great noise handling characteristics at high ISO, the flash may rarely be needed. The RAW files produced are exceptional providing magnificent Dynamic Range. There is tremendous resolution from the 24.3MP sensor... and combine that, once again, with that beautiful extremely sharp lens with creamy bokeh and amazing images can be produced.
The RX1 fits a very specific need... someone that uses and appreciates the 35mm Full Frame focal length, is seeking incredible Image Quality in a very small form factor. If you are not a real photo enthusiast you will find the very short depth of field (at f/2) a challenge to focus. This camera has CDAF technology like most mirrorless cameras. The shallow DOF further exposes the limitations of CDAF for auto-focusing if the subject is not fairly still. If you are aware of this fact before buying, it is a camera limitation you learn to work with. All cameras have limitations. The other obvious limitation is it is a fixed lens. If you want an amazing IQ small camera with a 35mm focal length because you either want it on you most of the time or you travel a lot... or you just love photographing with 35mm on non-active subjects... and if you do indoor photography a lot and need a bright lens with a camera sensor that has amazing noise handling, the RX1 may be the camera for you. It is a very unique type of camera and has the potential to be a classic. It also has the potential to hold its value for a long time. "Potential" does not mean "definitely"
If you think you are buying an amazing point and shoot Cybershot to photograph your young children DO NOT BUY THIS CAMERA. The auto-focus will disappoint unless you know you have the skill to photograph young children with manual focus (which, by the way, while the lens is focus by wire, it is smooth and buttery with just the right resistance on the RX1).
The RX1 is 3 thumbs up if you are the right individual with the right unique needs.
Скроменый эксперт
06.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I will briefly touch on what I find to be this camera's strong points as compared to my Nikon full frame:
Terrific low light sensitivity. Yes, this camera is slow to focus in low light, but once it locks, you get a very useable image, even in very dim light. The digital noise with this camera is somehow more like film grain than the usual digital noise.
Images looks terrific regardless of aperture. If you want confirmation, do a search on Flickr for "Sony RX1".
Very customizable, with three memory banks for your preferred settings.
It is a lot lighter that a DSLR and lens, so great for travel.
I think the color rendition, both in JPEG or RAW, is just terrific. Some disagree, but I disagree with them.
Bokeh is also nice for a wide/normal lens.
Cons:
Short battery life. You definitely need at least three to be ready for a day's shooting. Fortunately, they can be purchased on the secondary market for a reasonable price along with the wall charger that you should have received from Sony to begin with.
Fixed focal length makes shooting sports or action out of the question. This is a travel/landscape/informal portrait type of camera, which works for me. I can always bring out my DSLR and 70-300mm when I need that.
I have the EVF and it helps when you are in very bright light that obscures the LCD, but otherwise I prefer the LCD.
I know a lot of folks extoll the virtues of manual focus but I generally don't fool with it. I just compose-focus and fire away.
I have never used its video functions. I suppose they might be useful if you see Sasquatch but I am not a video guy.
Finally, note that the flash is not "bounceable", unlike the RX100, where the little flash can be manually tilted to get a bounce effect. Sony, what were you thinking?
Finally, for those who choose to buy, I strongly recommend using "manual mode" with auto iso and auto-focus. This gets you around the stubborn auto-iso feature that has been much discussed elsewhere. With manual mode, I first select the shutter speed (which is really a function of whether I am shooting any sort of movement or am in intense sunlight) and then choose aperture based on whether I am going for bokeh or depth of field. Once the aperture and speed are free of the auto-iso baked into aperture priority mode, you get a lot more flexibility.
Terrific low light sensitivity. Yes, this camera is slow to focus in low light, but once it locks, you get a very useable image, even in very dim light. The digital noise with this camera is somehow more like film grain than the usual digital noise.
Images looks terrific regardless of aperture. If you want confirmation, do a search on Flickr for "Sony RX1".
Very customizable, with three memory banks for your preferred settings.
It is a lot lighter that a DSLR and lens, so great for travel.
I think the color rendition, both in JPEG or RAW, is just terrific. Some disagree, but I disagree with them.
Bokeh is also nice for a wide/normal lens.
Cons:
Short battery life. You definitely need at least three to be ready for a day's shooting. Fortunately, they can be purchased on the secondary market for a reasonable price along with the wall charger that you should have received from Sony to begin with.
Fixed focal length makes shooting sports or action out of the question. This is a travel/landscape/informal portrait type of camera, which works for me. I can always bring out my DSLR and 70-300mm when I need that.
I have the EVF and it helps when you are in very bright light that obscures the LCD, but otherwise I prefer the LCD.
I know a lot of folks extoll the virtues of manual focus but I generally don't fool with it. I just compose-focus and fire away.
I have never used its video functions. I suppose they might be useful if you see Sasquatch but I am not a video guy.
Finally, note that the flash is not "bounceable", unlike the RX100, where the little flash can be manually tilted to get a bounce effect. Sony, what were you thinking?
Finally, for those who choose to buy, I strongly recommend using "manual mode" with auto iso and auto-focus. This gets you around the stubborn auto-iso feature that has been much discussed elsewhere. With manual mode, I first select the shutter speed (which is really a function of whether I am shooting any sort of movement or am in intense sunlight) and then choose aperture based on whether I am going for bokeh or depth of field. Once the aperture and speed are free of the auto-iso baked into aperture priority mode, you get a lot more flexibility.
Скроменый эксперт
27.05.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I will try to be very brief as there are tons of detailed reviews on Amazon as well as extended online discussions. I have read them all and still was not sure until I saw a refurbished Sony RX1 at 70% of the original price. That was too tempting and I decided to give it a try.
What can I say after taking a few dozens of comparative shots with RX1 and x100s? Yes, IQ (Image quality) of pictures taken by RX1 sometimes looked a bit better than what I have gotten with x100s. But 90% of the time I could not tell the difference - full frame or not, Zeiss lens or not. Dynamic range seemed about the same. The only noticeable difference was the blurred background effect at f2.0 thanks to the full frame sensor. Yes, that was quite impressive compared to x100s as it made the objects really stand out. But in terms of overall image quality between x100s and D600 with Sigma 35 f 1.4 Sony RX1 felt closer to x100s than to D600.
I really wish RX1 could replace both my x100s and D600, providing the IQ that would match stunning D600 pictures in a camera that weights as much as x100s even if a bit more bulky. Nope, I did not get that. Also, I noticed some green flaring in the pictures taken against the sun by RX1 when x100s would not have those.
Also, even with the discount the RX1 was 50% more than what I paid for my x100s. Higher price kind of kills the purpose of having a smaller camera as you don't want to carry a very expensive camera around too much. I feel that I can live with the risk of x100s being damaged or stolen, but I do not want to make this potential loss 50% larger if I upgrade to RX1.
This is how I feel about this camera. If you really really value image quality and really really hate large DSLRS, this camera might work for you. But I feel that x100s gives me what I want 95% of the time and for those special occasions when I want to be on the top of technical perfection I will pull out my D600 from the drawer.
I hope it helps. Happy shooting! :)
What can I say after taking a few dozens of comparative shots with RX1 and x100s? Yes, IQ (Image quality) of pictures taken by RX1 sometimes looked a bit better than what I have gotten with x100s. But 90% of the time I could not tell the difference - full frame or not, Zeiss lens or not. Dynamic range seemed about the same. The only noticeable difference was the blurred background effect at f2.0 thanks to the full frame sensor. Yes, that was quite impressive compared to x100s as it made the objects really stand out. But in terms of overall image quality between x100s and D600 with Sigma 35 f 1.4 Sony RX1 felt closer to x100s than to D600.
I really wish RX1 could replace both my x100s and D600, providing the IQ that would match stunning D600 pictures in a camera that weights as much as x100s even if a bit more bulky. Nope, I did not get that. Also, I noticed some green flaring in the pictures taken against the sun by RX1 when x100s would not have those.
Also, even with the discount the RX1 was 50% more than what I paid for my x100s. Higher price kind of kills the purpose of having a smaller camera as you don't want to carry a very expensive camera around too much. I feel that I can live with the risk of x100s being damaged or stolen, but I do not want to make this potential loss 50% larger if I upgrade to RX1.
This is how I feel about this camera. If you really really value image quality and really really hate large DSLRS, this camera might work for you. But I feel that x100s gives me what I want 95% of the time and for those special occasions when I want to be on the top of technical perfection I will pull out my D600 from the drawer.
I hope it helps. Happy shooting! :)
Скроменый эксперт
04.12.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I purchased and received this camera from Amazon.
I also own a Canon 5D Mark II, Olympus OM-D E-M5, and Sony RX100
I must say I had really high hopes for this camera. I hoped for a low-light monster that would provide the critical image quality that I turn to my 5D Mark II for, just in a more portable package. For reference I also own the Canon 35mm L f/1.4. For better or for worse, this review will be based on my experience with the RX1 compared to the 5D, OM-D and RX100.
First the good...
1.) The image quality is really that good. If you read Steve Huff and look at his samples, they are representative. I must admit the lens/camera combo *is capable* of producing images better than my 5D Mark II (see negatives). the lens is sharper at wide apertures than the Canon. The high ISO performance is really amazing. Probably one of the best Full Frame cameras of any form factor with respect to ISO performance.
2.) It's well built, if not perfect (more on this in the negatives). It feels much more solid than the RX100, but not at the level of the 5D or the OM-D.
3.) The ergonomics and controls are pretty good for the small form factor. I like the manual aperture ring and exp. comp. dial, but really I still prefer the ergonomics on both the 5D and OM-D
4.) Good Auto features for deep pocketed amateurs. In truth I did not test these features extensively
Now the Negatives...
1.) The camera struggles to focus in anything but good and great light. In low and moderately low light (read normally lit interior of a home) the camera misses focus on anything that is not static or has high contrast. Taking pictures of people / faces in these conditions, the camera focuses on the background (which is static and higher contrast) in 30-70% of my shots. This is very similar to my experience with the NEX 7, another camera I have owned and shot with. It is truly maddening to have a camera with so much potential that will not nail focus with any consistency. I warn any OM-D E-M5 owners, you will not be satisfied with the focusing performance on this camera unless you only shoot outdoors in good light or shoot still life. If you like to shoot pictures of kids or any non static people in less than ideal lighting, the camera does not cut it.
2.) The ergonomics should be better. I get the cool look of the camera, but given how far the lens sticks out from the body, Sony could easily have added more grip and better ergonomics without adding to the form factor negatively. The OM-D paired with the very sharp Panasonic 20mm 1.7 or Leica 25mm 1.4 has a similar form factor but better ergonomics
3.) if Olympus can weather seal the $999 OM-D, why can't Sony weather proof the RX1 which has a fixed lens and cost $2,800.00.
4.) The lack of image stabilization nullifies some of the ISO performance vs. the OM-D
5.) I love the idea of a fast 35mm prime, but for some, $2,800 might be to much to commit into a fixed lens camera.
6.) When you spend this much on an item, do companies like Sony really have to price-gouge you on the accessories, like viewfinders and thumb rests!??!?! I digress....
7.) the lens does not perform as well at smaller apertures and when focused closer to infinity, so it's not quite as good for landscape shooters
As I mentioned at the beginning, this review has been based on my experience and comparison of the RX1 and my other camera systems. This camera's sensor and lens are capable of real magic. In the right conditions it is really a dream. But for me, the RX1 did not fit the bill, literally at $2,799, and figuratively in terms of performance in lower light, which to me is where I would be using it often.
Hope this helps someone in deciding.
I also own a Canon 5D Mark II, Olympus OM-D E-M5, and Sony RX100
I must say I had really high hopes for this camera. I hoped for a low-light monster that would provide the critical image quality that I turn to my 5D Mark II for, just in a more portable package. For reference I also own the Canon 35mm L f/1.4. For better or for worse, this review will be based on my experience with the RX1 compared to the 5D, OM-D and RX100.
First the good...
1.) The image quality is really that good. If you read Steve Huff and look at his samples, they are representative. I must admit the lens/camera combo *is capable* of producing images better than my 5D Mark II (see negatives). the lens is sharper at wide apertures than the Canon. The high ISO performance is really amazing. Probably one of the best Full Frame cameras of any form factor with respect to ISO performance.
2.) It's well built, if not perfect (more on this in the negatives). It feels much more solid than the RX100, but not at the level of the 5D or the OM-D.
3.) The ergonomics and controls are pretty good for the small form factor. I like the manual aperture ring and exp. comp. dial, but really I still prefer the ergonomics on both the 5D and OM-D
4.) Good Auto features for deep pocketed amateurs. In truth I did not test these features extensively
Now the Negatives...
1.) The camera struggles to focus in anything but good and great light. In low and moderately low light (read normally lit interior of a home) the camera misses focus on anything that is not static or has high contrast. Taking pictures of people / faces in these conditions, the camera focuses on the background (which is static and higher contrast) in 30-70% of my shots. This is very similar to my experience with the NEX 7, another camera I have owned and shot with. It is truly maddening to have a camera with so much potential that will not nail focus with any consistency. I warn any OM-D E-M5 owners, you will not be satisfied with the focusing performance on this camera unless you only shoot outdoors in good light or shoot still life. If you like to shoot pictures of kids or any non static people in less than ideal lighting, the camera does not cut it.
2.) The ergonomics should be better. I get the cool look of the camera, but given how far the lens sticks out from the body, Sony could easily have added more grip and better ergonomics without adding to the form factor negatively. The OM-D paired with the very sharp Panasonic 20mm 1.7 or Leica 25mm 1.4 has a similar form factor but better ergonomics
3.) if Olympus can weather seal the $999 OM-D, why can't Sony weather proof the RX1 which has a fixed lens and cost $2,800.00.
4.) The lack of image stabilization nullifies some of the ISO performance vs. the OM-D
5.) I love the idea of a fast 35mm prime, but for some, $2,800 might be to much to commit into a fixed lens camera.
6.) When you spend this much on an item, do companies like Sony really have to price-gouge you on the accessories, like viewfinders and thumb rests!??!?! I digress....
7.) the lens does not perform as well at smaller apertures and when focused closer to infinity, so it's not quite as good for landscape shooters
As I mentioned at the beginning, this review has been based on my experience and comparison of the RX1 and my other camera systems. This camera's sensor and lens are capable of real magic. In the right conditions it is really a dream. But for me, the RX1 did not fit the bill, literally at $2,799, and figuratively in terms of performance in lower light, which to me is where I would be using it often.
Hope this helps someone in deciding.
Скроменый эксперт
11.11.2015
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
WONDERFUL CAMERA WITH HORRIBLE SONY SUPPORT. A FIRMWARE UPDATE WOULD HELP THIS PRODUCT IMMENSELY BUT YET HAS NEVER RECEIVED ONE. I WILL NO LONGER BUY SONY PRODUCTS BECAUSE OF THIS.
Скроменый эксперт
20.08.2015
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Only lasted two years before a major common defect with the manual focus lens. Many folks reported this issue online. Sony has all but abandonded rx1 owners, no firmware updates ar all and now they recommend a shady third party that claims misleading flat rate repairs. The camera was great but I lost my faith in Sony imaging products.
Скроменый эксперт
25.07.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The level of image quality produced by this camera is no less than extraordinary. The RX1 produces 24 megapixel images that contain tons of detail as well as realistic color and tonality. The full frame CMOS sensor also delivers a great deal of dynamic range.
Bottom line, if you want a small camera that produces DSLR quality images and provides a good deal of manual control, this is a fantastic camera.
Bottom line, if you want a small camera that produces DSLR quality images and provides a good deal of manual control, this is a fantastic camera.
Скроменый эксперт
13.03.2015
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Package was nicely packed - contained two batteries individually packed. One charger individually packed. Some lint for camera cleanup etc. A Cigarette lighter adapter which was nice to have.
I was able to charge all three batteries including the Sony original battery using the adapter. Adapter has a green and amber light to indicate charging/charged status.
I have not used the batteries yet so I cannot tell you how long they last compared to the original batteries or how many charge cycles it will last. I do hope they will last about 2 hrs each just in case I play a marathon tennis match (not really likely) but wishful thinking.
Over all, I am very pleased with the product, I am giving 3 stars because I have not used the batteries yet. I will revise this rating once I use the batteries and see how they work/last etc.
I was able to charge all three batteries including the Sony original battery using the adapter. Adapter has a green and amber light to indicate charging/charged status.
I have not used the batteries yet so I cannot tell you how long they last compared to the original batteries or how many charge cycles it will last. I do hope they will last about 2 hrs each just in case I play a marathon tennis match (not really likely) but wishful thinking.
Over all, I am very pleased with the product, I am giving 3 stars because I have not used the batteries yet. I will revise this rating once I use the batteries and see how they work/last etc.
Скроменый эксперт
01.05.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The image quality is second to none. If you need a silent, sharp, small full frame camera, then this is it. You get what you pay for and this camera is not cheap. Built like a solid brick, all dials smooth like butter, and also has a 50mm and 75mm equivalent zoom. Focusing on moving objects could be improved upon but if you know what your doing and have patience, you can nail those moving objects.
EVF isn't a deal breaker but is nice to have. Buy it. Now.
EVF isn't a deal breaker but is nice to have. Buy it. Now.
Скроменый эксперт
04.02.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Get this camera and keep it. There is nothing else like it. Seriously, nothing else. The only full frame point and shoot in the world but it's fantastic. I know it's expensive but look for good used deals on Ebay and Amazon and local stores, etc. The IQ thru the Zeiss glass always impresses me on Lightroom 5.
I find myself using this camera more and more and it has spoiled me. My ILC camera is an APS-C sensor and I have four lenses for it but, because of my RX1R, I'm thinking I'll have to go full frame ILC. Thanks Sony for a great product but PLEASE update the firmware. They never have updated the firmware on either the RX1 or RX1R. Paying too much attention to their A7 series!! This camera is a classic. I have determined it to be so! :)
I find myself using this camera more and more and it has spoiled me. My ILC camera is an APS-C sensor and I have four lenses for it but, because of my RX1R, I'm thinking I'll have to go full frame ILC. Thanks Sony for a great product but PLEASE update the firmware. They never have updated the firmware on either the RX1 or RX1R. Paying too much attention to their A7 series!! This camera is a classic. I have determined it to be so! :)
Скроменый эксперт
29.01.2015
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I really loved this product at first. I was surprised that it has a little bendable quality to it so it isn't a hard glass product like others I have purchsed in the past. I tried it anyway and it worked for a while but eventually I think the bending part caused it to bubble in the middle. It caused a rainbowing which I didn't like and so I took it off. It did go on and come off easily and cleanly. Vendor did offer to replace the product but I think I'm going to find a glass one instead. I did LOVE the magic fiber cloth it came with. That is fantastic and works great! Might go see if I can buy a few more of those to keep around.
Скроменый эксперт
23.11.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
****** PLEASE READ ****** Reviews have noted that there is a "rainbow" effect once the protector is applied. Sort of looks like bubbling between the protector and the LCD screen. I have encountered this and was able to correct it as soon as we saw it.
The adhesive for this product lines the edges of the protector around 1/32 of an inch. When applying, slowly lay the protector on without PRESSING in the middle. Have it naturally lay on the screen and then press ONLY on the edges of the screen. Run your fingers around the edges making sure the adhesive has contact.
After doing it this method I was able to achieve a perfect fit without any dust or rainbow-ing effect. The middle portion of the LCD screen is perfect. Even when pressing and cleaning the protector in the middle, is it still perfect. Hope this works out for others.
The adhesive for this product lines the edges of the protector around 1/32 of an inch. When applying, slowly lay the protector on without PRESSING in the middle. Have it naturally lay on the screen and then press ONLY on the edges of the screen. Run your fingers around the edges making sure the adhesive has contact.
After doing it this method I was able to achieve a perfect fit without any dust or rainbow-ing effect. The middle portion of the LCD screen is perfect. Even when pressing and cleaning the protector in the middle, is it still perfect. Hope this works out for others.
Показаны отзывы 25-48 из 468.
