Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit
147 отзывов пользователей o Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit
Пользовались
Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
10.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Picture/Video quality:Coming from a Canon Rebel XSI and having a friend who bought a Nikon D5100 recently I have some decent comparisons. I'm an amatuer and don't wanna mess with RAW which means my initial impression was based on JPG quality. My primary use is home movies and pics of my kids, mostly indoors/low light. With the default settings I was very disappointed with the results in mid-low light (Firmware 1.03). Something in the sharpening algorithm makes everything look swatchy and unnatural, probably because of too much noise suppression. I took the same pics with XSI and they looked smoother and nicer to me even after downsizing the a65 pics to 12mp. But, on sonyalpharumors.com they mentioned JPG's might improve in some new firmware and in the meantime using -2 contrast, -2 sharpening helps, I tried that and it is dramatically improved for my taste. I also shot in RAW a little prior to that change and could tell there's plenty of detail so there's obviously room for JPG improvement. After playing around with it for a while I'm starting to like it more and more. The autofocus and steadyshot work great during movie mode, a little slow in mid-low light. Kit lens autofocus noise is present but fairly minimal. 60p greatly reduces rolling shutter. Video quality is AMAZING. Exposure, ISO, and AF Modes can all be adjusted during videos. Pictures are great up to ISO 1600. 3200 is fairly decent, 6400 and on degrades quite a bit. Starts up so fast most of the time. Not sure why but sometimes takes 4-5 seconds, most of the time it's less than 1 second from off to pic. Battery life is decent. Took it on a weekend trip, used it about 1/3 of each day for a couple hundred pics and a dozen 1-2 minute videos and got home with 22%. I felt like I had to use it a little conservatively to last the weekend but might be able to improve that by turning GPS off.Novelties:2x Smart teleconverter is nice but no different than cropping a picture down after the fact, would be way more useful if enabled for video. It's nice novelty to be able to review photos/access menus in the EVF, and the quality is great for both the EVF and LCD. Can set camera down with Articulating screen facing you for self portrait because the screen folds out to the bottom. Smile detection didn't work with large group (15 people) probably because faces become too small to detect. Also, if you try to do a self portrait it's so fast that sometimes only one person is smiling and then takes about 5 seconds to automatically start detecting again. HDR/Panorama/Bracketed shots work well. I'm not a big fan of separate folders for pics and videos in review mode. Takes 3 "clicks" to switch from one to the other.Positives:* Autofocus during video/live view works great, a little slower in lower light.* EVF/LCD quality is amazing* Haven't noticed overheating* 60p video virtually eliminates rolling shutter* Super fast startup* No EVF/LCD blackout during burst mode* Menus very user friendly and presentable* Like the AF Zone option (XSI didn't have this. Uses left, right or center AF points)* Exposure, ISO, and AF Modes can all be adjusted during videos* Menus and photo review accessible in EVF* Articulating screen* GPS works well and locks fairly fast* Battery life good enoughNegatives* Default JPG settings disappoints, but can be improved* No smart teleconverter during videos* Pics and videos are separate in review mode* Wish max ISO was configurable in P/A/S modes and video mode* After 10-12 pic burst at 10 fps, slows to 1.5 fps while buffer is clearing. Can still see LCD/EVF tho (just can't burst as fast)* Slow shutdown, although not really a problem* Screen folds out to the bottom so can't set it down facing you for self portrait* Deleting pics a little slow. Takes about 1 second per pic, although multiple delete is available.* Hand grip is a little cramped for my big hands, but not too bad* Not as big of a "newer" lens selection as Canikon. Lots of great older minolta's, but not as many newer budget options that generally have quieter autofocus motors which would be nice for videos.All in all i'd definitely recommend it. I don't think I could justify the a77 personally since there's very few differences I care about. More cross-type AF points, configureable max ISO in P/A/S modes, lens AF micro-adjust and weather sealing are the main ones, but not enough to justify the price. Definitely prefer it over my Canon XSI and friends Nikon D5100 though.
Скроменый эксперт
13.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
To start, this will be a review from a newbie. I have no experience in photography what so ever. I have always used a decent point and shoot but never seemed to get a properly focused shot. I decided to finally spend the money and invest in a DSLR. After receiving this Sony, I was immediately impressed with the overall build quality and overall ease of use even though I have no experience with the unit.Between yesterday and today, I have taken approximately 500 shots, some in light, some in dark with flash. Let's just say that this camera can NOT take a bad picture. The details in every single picture that I have taken are awesome. Keep in mind I have no clue when it comes to professional photography, what they would be looking for. The viewfinder itself is amazing to look through. It has the built in level and grid showing focus points and the image is crystal clear. The lcd screen is also very crystal clear and easy to use. I really like how it automatically switches from LCD to viewfinder when you put your face close to it.I find the 18-55mm zoom kit lens to be very nice. I took a few images of some landscaping from about 100 feet away and was able to get some really clear shots. The auto tracking focus does a great job for snapping shots on the go.From power off position to actually taking a picture is lightning fast. Pretty much as fast as your hand can switch it on and then take a picture is how fast it will process the first image.Movie mode I tried a couple of times and it takes AMAZING audio and video. Between movements, there is no sudden jerks or jolts shown in video. Audio is crystal clear.Battery life seems decent. After taking 300 shots and playing with different menu functions and taking video, I still had about 33% left. I will probably pick up a second battery just to be safe.Overall I am very happy with my purchase and look forward to learning the art of photography.
Скроменый эксперт
04.01.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this strictly for video work but I have to return it and get the A77. I really liked this camera though. It shares the same large sensor as Sony's NEX-VG30H $2,700 semi-pro video camera. Problem: The LCD flip out screen only turns to face outward from below. If the camera is on a tripod it's almost useless if you're in front of the camera. I knew that before I bought it but I thought I could get by and line up shots before stepping out front. I tried but it just sucks to work that way. It's too much of a hassle re-doing takes I messed up because I couldn't see. The A77 screen flips over the top and that's what I need. It's just a lot of money for that one feature. Otherwise I would have kept it.I think the auto focus is way too fast for video work. It's too jarring and sometimes erratic. Manual focus is the way to go or just be very careful with the AF zones and avoid large shifts in focus. FYI, in video mode, you cannot use auto-focus unless you're in total automatic mode with this camera, i.e. you cannot adjust shutter speed and/or aperture ~and~ use auto-focus at the same time. I don't think the A77 can do it either. (My Panasonic HC-X920 can do it.) This is really only an issue for me in very low light when I want to lower the shutter speed down to 1/25 but the cost/benefit ratio outweighs this issue.The footage looks great though. Nice shallow depth of field when I want it. It matches almost perfectly with that from my Panasonic HC-X920. I can barely tell the difference. I got the 18-135mm lens and it's pretty good. It's a little noisy in indoor lighting with the ISO above 400. Gonna try the f/2.8 16-50mm and that should help.The built-in mic is a total hiss factory but who cares. It's good enough to sync to.
Скроменый эксперт
01.01.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I consider myself a novice when it comes to photograph although I've been taking pictures as an amateur for decades now. So, I wanted a nice DSLR (smart) camera that can take nice pictures and videos without having to do too much in terms of adjustment in the process. After some extensive research, I decided to settle for the Sony A65V for a couple of reasons, first, the price has stabilized in the past year or so compared to other cameras on the market with the same features, second, it supports all my old Minolta lenses which means that I won't have to dish out hundreds of dollars more to buy lenses ....sweet.When I received the camera I immediately charged the battery for about 6 hours straight, then affixed the a Minolta lens to it while I study the different features in the menu. Once I had enough knowledge of most of the features, I took it outside and started taking pictures using different settings including the use of the GPS which is a nice feature to have to impress your friends (lol). I found this camera to be light, easy to carry, and ergonomically fit for my big hands which means that I can reach any button of the camera while looking through the viewfinder. The pictures are crisp, colorful, vivid, one might say they are of Post Card quality. I also took a 30 minute video at Epcot Center of a Choir performance which turned out quite well. As we speak, I am still evaluating the camera, but as of now, I must stay that I am very pleased with its performance. I'll upgrade this review if I experience anything negative in the future. Would I recommend this camera to a friend? YES. Absolutely.
Скроменый эксперт
24.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have owned many cameras in the past 20+ years from different manufacturers. I've never had a Nikon but always used Kodak, Fuji, Canon and as of late Sony. All camera manufacturers have the ability to produce nice to excellent image quality, it is important to have the right tool then go get creative with it. Now for my review.I won't go into great detail but I can tell you that I was always a big fan of Optical Viewfinder's. They let you see through the lens and the image is not an electronic representation of what you're shooting. When the SLT's first came out, I thought I would never get one but boy was I surprised! I like being able to make changes and knowing what the picture will look like before I take it. This is one of the benefits of the electronic viewfinder, also it has an overlay of information regarding the camera's functions, or you can tailor it to your liking.At 10 frames per second, it's really fast. I haven't had any lag issues with the electronic viewfinder when panning my shots, "i.e. birds in flight". But it helps to have a fast shutter speed trust me! The focus speed is also very quick and it will auto track the subject that is in motion. I haven't had an issue with this, except for the very rare out of focus shot.ISO performance is where this camera loses ˝ star. You would be fine up to ISO 1600, but after that details in lowlight get a bit mushy. Also, it depends what you call acceptable. For my purposes, I can print up to ISO 3200 on 8 x 10 and still be happy. Those extreme pixel peepers might want to look elsewhere, but you would be happier with a better lens "wider constant aperture".The JPEG's are for me very acceptable, but for even better image quality you should be shooting in RAW which is where this 24 megapixel sensor excels. Image quality is a matter of opinion for most, but this is not an issue for me.As for the cameras construction, it is mostly made of polycarbonate plastic, with a nice, firm rubber grip and it does feel well-built. This camera is not weather sealed, so if you do purchase this make sure to buy a good camera bag. For that, I purchased the Lowepro Nova 170 AW which is an all weather bag that also has a bonnet to pull over in case of heavy rain.In conclusion, I would say this camera has been worth the purchase for me. You would benefit from buying a good lens and perhaps Carl Zeiss is not out of the question. I hope I have helped "somewhat" with your decision on this camera and if you do purchase, that it will serve you just as well. I couldn't be happier :-)
Скроменый эксперт
20.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I read all the reviews about people not liking the quality of the low light photos.However for my use case, (mostly fast moving kids in a darker home), this works wonders compared to other cameras we've used. As mentioned elsewhere, it can take 4 pictures in rapid succession in low light and then merges them into one to deal with noise. I'm sure getting a lens with a larger aperture will also help when I have money for that.Otherwise, pictures are incredible and I'm so glad I got the camera. The video is also incredible. Generally speaking, people say that video on a dslr isn't very good compared to a handheld camcorder. However, because of the autofocus (yes I'm aware that "real" photographers/videographers don't uses autofocus, they like manual), the video quality is incredible. It's worlds better than our panasonic HC-V100M that's only a year or so old. Other brands like Canon and NIkon supposedly don't have this same feature and the video quality suffers because of it. We wanted one machine for high quality images and video.Lastly, my wife was concerned because it wasn't as simple as a point and shoot. However, she also loves it now, even though she is just using the auto settings. Her pictures are turning out great. Only downside is the size and weight of the camera. But I think it's worth it.
Скроменый эксперт
01.04.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
My main camera is a Canon 5D Mkiii, I will be honest I love the camera and it works great! I am a semi professional photographer and work far from my studio. I was looking for a camera I could leave in studio and doing some research I saw that DXO ranked this camera very close to my 5Dmkiii for portrait color depth and sensor performance at LOW ISO's. So at 24mp this camera might be what I am looking for. I found a used camera on craigslist locally for 450 dollars and it came with a kit lens. I ended up picking up the Sony 50mm 1.4, 35mm SAM lens and 85mm SAM lens. With this I should be good to shoot most anything.For studio use:Dislikes of the camera-When only the modeling lights are on AF is a bit slow and can be off from time to time.-EVF makes for a grainy viewfinder to look through-Needs adapter to use standard hot shoeLikes:-Image Quality is very good for a cheap camera-Face detect AFAll in all for price, this camera is great. Outside of studio I will say once the ISO starts to rise the image gets noisy fast! But what do you expect, 24 MP on an APS sensor. Of course.Great value!
Скроменый эксперт
28.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
My old Sony A100, which has served me well for several years, was due for an upgrade. I did a fair amount of research on cameras in the Sony brand and began to lock in on the A65. The features it contains fit my style of photography very well...which includes just about everything from nature and landscape to events and people, and the price fell within my budget. Many of the comparison reviews I read/watched compared it favorably against comperable Canon and Nikon cameras with the Sony winning out in most categories. My first impressions from day one of its arrival were favorable. My only concern was I wasn't sure how I would like the digital viewfinder, but my fears were set aside when I discovered how easy the digital viewfinder made it to use manual focus...which I need to do sometimes. Using my A100 I just could never get manual focus to work very well...plus my third party 1.4 teleconverter would not autofocus with the lenses I have using the A100, but discovered to my delight that for some reason with the A65, it appears to no longer be an issue...more testing is required though to determine if that holds true.The only negative I see with the camera is that it seems almost too lightly built to be rugged enough for heavy outdoors/nature photography. The old A100 feels more robust than the larger A65. It's certainly not a show stopper, but a noticable factor to me. It just needs to be handled with proper care. My A100 was dropped several times, fell off the tripod a time or two, and had the tripod fall over at least once, plus I used it in rain and fog and cold and heat, and it never failed once...that was one tough little camera. The only other negative was that with my main goto lens...again a third party 50-500mm lens...there was an auto focus compatibility issue with the A65. To their credit, the lens manufacturer offered a free upgrade to resolve the issue and said the upgrade would make it fully compatible...at this writing I am still waiting to test out that promise. So far from what use I've been able to apply...the A65 makes a great upgrade.Update:I've used the A65 for a few weeks now and have fallen in love with it. The upgrade on the 50-500 lens worked beautifully with no issues. The navigation on the menu screens is easy and logical...love the OLED view finder and the video is supurb!
Скроменый эксперт
01.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Although, I am somewhat of a rookie to the new electronic SLRs, I found this camera to be a good camera on which to cut my teeth. I did own a Minolta SRT-102 in its hey day and this is a nice transition to the new-fangled scene. The range of effects that this camera can reproduce is astonishing. I will admit to going to this product because of its price entry point (and the fact that all my stereo and multi-media presentation devices are Sony) and am pleased that I got what I did for less than a thousand dollars. Believe me, there are plenty of cameras out there that may do more and be more "professional" in their leanings, but this camera does what it says it will do. A word of advice, get the model with the telephoto lens (18-135mm). You can always buy a different lens later. I love this camera and I will be heard to say, from this point forward, "This is MY camera. There are many like it, but this one is MINE."
Скроменый эксперт
28.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Photography has been a hobby of mine for the past three years, and I've been through several Sony alpha series cameras. I started with the a330, sold that to upgrade to the a550, and then sold that to upgrade to the a65. I also own the a37. More on that in a bit.I primarily use this camera for concert photography, as live music is another hobby of mine. While the a550 was excellent at low-light photography, the a65 pretty much blows it out of the water in terms of shooting at high IS0 (usually at 1600) and its super fast 10 shots per second feature. Even shooting at ISO 3200 will produce usable results.The video feature, however, is where this camera truly shines. I've gotten more and more into video production in the past year, and the cinematic quality that this camera produces matches top tier Canon cameras at a much lower price. Seriously, if you are considering shooting video with a DSLR, this is the wisest and most affordable purchase you'll ever make. I highly suggest shooting in Manual mode with a shutter speed of 1/50, and shoot at 24p if you can. You will be blown away by how "filmic" the results are. This camera paired with my a37, has produced some pretty amazing footage.The high resolution swivel screen is also a major plus. You can view the screen from any angle and it always looks beatiful. I suggest you keep the screen in its closed position (with the screen facing the camera) when you store it in your bag. The screen, although somewhat resistent to scratches, CAN get scratched, so be careful. Buy a screen protector if you don't think you can remember to close it every time you're done using the camera.Some people don't like the electronic viewfinder. It's a matter of taste. I loved the optical viewfinder on my a550, but honestly the electronic viewfinder is pretty awesome. Get with the times, this is where photography is heading.I can't reccomend this camera more if you're very much into photography/video but don't want to spend thousands of dollars on pro equipment. It really isn't necessary when you can get a camera of this quality for under $700.
Скроменый эксперт
25.12.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I tried the T4i (650D in Asian countries) by Canon. However, I and my wife both missed a lot of shots during kids parties as that live view of the Canon was not suitable for fast focusing ability. This Sony SLT-a65, however, is stunning in that regard. Plus, after using Lightroom 5 for final touch ups, WOW !!! The photos are clear, noise-free, detailed, and carry no noticeable noise up to ISO 1600 or even ISO 3200. We also purchased a Sony A-mount 50mm f 1.8 prime lens. That really comes in handy at night and depth-of-field or bokeh are great and smooth as well.We are not pro level at all, we just love taking interesting shots and doing some touch-up of photos, and that's about it. This Sony SLT-a65 is wonderful and easy to work with. We still are yet to experience its video side though. I have also purchased the SLT-a77 with the f2.8 18-55mm Sony lens. We are also thinking about getting the NEX-5t since sometimes we do want a smaller alternative when we have a long trip. My uncle is buying the new full-frame A7r mirrorless camera from Sony also.Anyway, thanks Sony. Keep on innovating .....
Скроменый эксперт
01.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'll have to admit, I was a little apprehensive in purchasing a Sony brand camera. Perhaps because I've always known that Nikon and Canon are the brands the pros use. Well, I'm not a pro but I did take a basic photography class in college and I must say this camera is truly an amazing piece of equipment. Before purchasing, I went to the Houston Camera Exchange store and compared the Canon 60D to the Sony A65. (Having in mind I was going to purchase the Canon or perhaps a Nikon of similar quality). Both having a similar quality lens, the pictures on the Sony were significantly better looking in terms of color. The Canon seemed to loose the true color images i was shooting. The Sony also felt better in the hand and I really liked the explanation of the shooting modes when you move the dial. The translucent mirror seems to be an outstanding concept. I believe the other brands will soon do away with the reflex mirror and use the translucent mirror technology. It just seems the less moving parts, the better. The Sony Alpha is not an SLR. It's an SLT. Single lens Translucent (mirror). The mirror does not move as with the SLR's.I purchased the body only and additionally purchased the Sony SAL 18250Alpha DT 18-250mm lens from Amazon as well. Although the lens was almost as expensive as the camera body, it's much better quality than most lenses that come with camera package deals. The 18-250mm covers just about anything I'll ever need it for. I might get one more lens in the future.I've only had the camera two weeks so I'll make a promise to update this rating in the future in terms of longevity. However, at the moment, I'm more satisfied than I thought I would be. I like shooting in low light situations and this camera is outstanding in that category. I've taken some cool night time pics without flash. With and without tripod and all pics were really great quality.I would recommend purchasing David Bush's Sony SLT - A65 Book. It's 386 pages and very comprehensive yet very easy to read for beginners as well as seasoned photographers. The book along with a SanDisc Extreme 32 GB will provide you with an outstanding camera package.
Скроменый эксперт
06.05.2014
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
have had this camera for 1.5 years and have been very frustrated with the (lack of) quality of the pictures. Back focus is a major problem with this camera and unlike the higher end cameras it cannot be adjusted by the user. Sony service is dismissive and simply will refer you to a Sony web page that tells you how to test for back focus problems. It is telling that there actually is a Sony page for this problem! I recently purchased a iPhone 5S and have to say that it makes better pictures than the A65. My wife's Canon Powershot S100 (at $350) makes WAY better pictures than this!
Скроменый эксперт
27.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is a really nice camera. I have been taking pictures for 45 plus years and use this camera to produce really great photography. It has a very rich feature set, take great detail pictures that are accurately color balanced. You have some really great options with this camera as it offers a wealth features to aid in doing almost any type of photography you want. To me the result is a great picture whether taken in raw or J-Peg. After all is that not what you buy a camera for?
Скроменый эксперт
03.04.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Before buying Sony A65, I was convinced to buy nikon D3200. Ever since I wanted a camera, I imagine I will have the Nikon, not a Sony. But, through researching, I went to Sony Store and played with the displayed cameras. I fall in love with the Sony A65 for its features. The screen...awesome to do selfies. I can take 3d pictures. And its easy to use. Still a beginner but slowly Im learning how to use my new camera. I also went to Sears where the nikon D3200 was displayed. And I barely understood it. So between these to I recommend obviously the Sony A65 for any beginner who wants a dsrl camera.
Скроменый эксперт
12.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this camera December 2011, while looking for a camera that could do both photographs and video on an acceptable level. I was considering to go with a Nikon or canon because people made it seem as if they were the only 2 brands that could work professionally (they were so wrong).I was reviewing a bunch of Nikons and canons n found that they all sucked at video autofocus . Then I read that it was Sony providing Nikon with image sensors, that made me start looking at Sony.I found the a65 and it was in line with all the top brands and beating them in allot of areas so i took a chance(absolutely no regrets).In less than 2yrs I now own 2 a65, 1a77, my photography website and a blooming company............ Thanks Sony, you took me from ZERO TO HERO.
Скроменый эксперт
28.03.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have only used this camera for a short time, but I like it so far. The absence of an optical viewfinder takes some getting use to. The images appear sharper compared to my previous Canon Xsi. Auto exposure seems to be adequate, unlike the Canon, which routinely overexposed the sensor. My biggest complaint is that the panorama mode simply does not function. It displays various errors upon trying to use it and those errors are not correctable. I hate to send it back to SONY just for that, especially as I need to use it and do not have a back-up. I will try to report more in the future.
Скроменый эксперт
09.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Great camera. Live view is excellent for natural family photos. No need to use viewfinder so people are not so self conscious. Indoor shots with Sony 16-50mm f2.8 are very good. Even better with Sigma 20mm f1.8. The camera is worth the good lens. 24 megapixels is great for cropping. Camera zoom is nice to extend lens for further away shots w/o changing lens(does lower megapixels to 12 or 6)
Скроменый эксперт
14.01.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was needing to get a new video camera to record reference footage for an animation project. I almost made a mistake and purchasing an expensive production video camera. My producer advised me to go with a DSLR and after looking at several reviews and already having an Sony A200. I found the best bang for the buck in the Sony A65. I have done some test shoots with this camera using a Minolta 50mm F1.4 AF lens and I have been blown away. This camera has amazing speed in its auto focus and I dont have to pay an arm and a leg for lenses due to the AF being built into the camera. This camera also works well with vintage lenses for manual focus shooting. I would suggest this camera over any other for those who shoot video productions with DSLRs.
Скроменый эксперт
25.02.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
this sony for some reason has glitches i have purchased other cameras exactly the same models as this one and they worked fine but for some reason this one has issues that i do not understand,I do not blame the seller i believe it is just a bad one for some reason this is my back up camera for another a65 that i own that recently broke down after much use with out any issues i enjoy the other camera so much that i amsending it back to get repaired than perhaps i can send this one back to get its bugs worked out as well.I hope this was a useful comment and helped you decide which camera to purchase
Скроменый эксперт
24.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I had a Sony Cybershot that I had used for about ten years and loved it. The camera was awesome and I had wonderful pictures from it. This made me want to get another good camera that had a larger pixel size and a little more advanced. This camera is wonderful. I am always using the 3 inch display; however what I like is being able to turn it back facing the camera so it does'nt get scratched. The photos I have taken from this camera has excellent color and size. I liked it so well that I purchased a model somewhat cheaper for my grandson who is now interested in taking special pictures.
Скроменый эксперт
09.04.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Very much satisfied with the performance of the new Sony A65 camera. I have only had it for about 2 weeks but have found it puts out excellent pictures. I'm only an amateur but this camera seems to automatically put me into a higher class of photographers. So far shooting mostly in auto mode but as I get more acquainted with the numerous settings available I'll be headed to more specialized picture taking. Satisfied, yes, more than satisfied.
Скроменый эксперт
16.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Okay so I purchased this around February, I have to say this is the biggest step I have every taken from beginners to a higher end camera for photography and film making and I'm glad I made the perfect choice to upgrade from a beginners Dslr like the Nikon D3100 to this puppy the A65 and its beastliness!
Скроменый эксперт
13.11.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
A professional photographer, I acquired a Sony A-65V as a second body. The A-65V is indeed a nice camera...impressive given it is an baseline consumer model.Perhaps my favorite feature: Shooting in full Manual mode, doing tripod based work (e.g. product shoots), I like how the viewfinder highlights and outlines edges that are in focus.Rather than repeat what all the other reviews have said, I do have one major nit with this unit:The A-65V is the noisiest digital camera I own. In anything resembling low-light conditions it is very noisy. As the ISO climbs and/or light levels fall, image noise rapidly becomes unacceptable. For professional work I can only use it during daylight or with flash.For the average consumer I believe most will be suitably wow'd with what the camera offers. However if you are looking for a revenue-producing tool, you need to be aware this camera is -not- an ideal all'rounder.
Показаны отзывы 73-96 из 147.
