Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit
147 отзывов пользователей o Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit
Пользовались
Sony Alpha SLT-A65 Kit?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
28.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + -Цветопередача
-Удобный, хорошо лежит в руке, не тяжелый (я девушка, не хотела тяжелый)
-Взяла с объективом 18-135: отличное приближение, снимала на разных расстояниях
-Возможность снимать в 3D(приятный бонус)
-Видео (конечно, не видеокамера, но стабилизация неплохая) - - Нет
Я непрофессионал, просто в один прекрасный день поняла, что мыльницы не хватает. Люблю путешествия, брала именно для этого. Лучше брать сразу с большим объективом, чтобы не менять по дороге объективы. Фотоаппарат классный, снимки шикарные.
воронов андрей
30.09.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Привет всем.Вобщем прикупил себе этот аппарат,очень доволен.Расписывать достоинства фото не буду все кто снимал знает что снимки отличного качества,дам оценку видео съемке,видео наивысшего качества+полностью ручные установки дают возможность экспериментировать.
- - Брал 2 KIT 18-55 и 55-200 оба объектива не важнецкие по резкости.Слабоват аккумулятор,можно сказать очень слабоват особенно при использовании скоростной съемки,съедает на раз-два-три.Но заявленные 500 снимков держит,мне кажется что как бы не 600-650.
Аппарат отличный,есть куча недостатков перед конкурентами но столько...
Техова Ольга
19.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + эргономика, удобный хват, качество сборки (тайланд), эви, поворотный экран, настраиваемые кнопки, емкий аккум, кит 18-135, 24 мп, множество художеств примочек и возм прямого доступа к ним с помощью настраиваемых кнопок, HDR и много много всего,что перечислено ниже
- - в моем экземпляре крышка аккум отсека какая-то не такая. то ли из др пластика, то ли брак - отлич по цвету от корпуса (светлее), выглядит дешево, хлипкая конструкция. . . но...
уколов николай
06.03.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + эви подсказки начинающим отличное видео множество функций жк экран пикинг удобный хват
- - пока не нашел
приобрел с kit 18-135 фото занимаюсь с 1967 года. видео пользоваться очень легко. к фото какое то время надо...
Пресняков Николай
02.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + много полезных функций,удобный алгоритм ,отличные снимки с великолепной цветопередачей,возможность использования старой оптики,широкий выбор выдержек,хороший хват.
- - Китовый 18-55 НИКАКОЙ!16-105 ЛУЧШЕ ,Юпитер37А класс!.Шумы выше 1600,посредственное руководство пользователя,мал диапозон диоптрий,не найти внешний микр. в продаже,оптика дороже...
Красько Олег
02.04.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Фазовый АФ в режиме видео.
Возможность сьемки AVCHD 1920x1080
Ухватистая рукоять
Довольно емкая АКБ
Хорошее качество при ISO 100-400 (при условии качественного объектива)
Много функций (но в основном ненужных серьезным любителям)
GPS - - Нет подсветки аф
Большинство серьезных настроек в меню отсутствует =>
Нет возможности подстраивать АФ если объектив дает бэк/фронт фокус
Управление нестандартное, мало управляющих кнопок.
На ИСО 800 и выше шумодав замазывает все мелкие текстуры
Объективы в среднем дороже (но не лучше чем аналоги от кэнон/никон)
Оптика видоискателя не ахти - по бокам поля обзора мазня
Макс. шаг экспобрэкетинга - всего 0.7 EV
Бедная комплектация
Смехотворно короткая бумажная инструкция
Цена завышена
Купил а65+18-55кит в подарок. Хотел проверить объектив и матрицу при покупке, но не...
Скроменый эксперт
23.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Матрица 5+,эргономика,скорость серии,качество видео и авто фокуса в видео.
- - малая эксповилка, отсутствие...
Мазин Петр
28.07.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + 1)24мп
2)Качественный видоискатель
3)10к в сек.
4)Откидной дисплей с двумя степенями свободы и очень качественной цветопередачей.
5)Хоть и пластиковый но качественный корпус :)
6)Логичные и удобные элементы управления.
7)Поставляется в весьма хорошем комплекте, и провода и софт и всё весьма дополняет образ.
8)GPS
9)Редко промахивается в экспозиции :) - - 1)Стандартный kit объектив мылит по краям что не есть гуд. И резкие снимки выходят с d6.5 но моём...
Никифоров Ефим
27.07.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + 1.Полупрозрачное зеркало!
2.Съемка видео - нет слов!
3.Ёмкая АКБ, у меня хватает на 600-800 фото(вспышкой мало пользуюсь)+видео около получаса...
4.Шустрый АФ
5.все необходимые порты есть, даже стерео мик подключается)))и не слышно шур-шур фокусировки от кита! - - 1.качество объектива. До 28 явно заметные искажения, 35-55 норм. Немного люфтит фокус.
2.Цена явно завышена!(купил за 28 в мае)
3.нет подстройки АФ
4...
Горшков Дмитрий
29.03.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Покупался в первую очередь для съёмки видео - так вот качество видео лучше за такие деньги не найти..
-Отличнейшее качество видео (1920х1080, прогрессивные 50 кадров в сек)
-Приличное качество фотографий
-Очень быстрый процессор (все срабатывает мгновенно)
-Очень удобно держать его
-Поддерживает не только memory stick но и SD которые дешевле первых
-Достаточно емкий аккумулятор, родной еще ни разу не садился хотя и по много часов видео снималось
-Насыщенные цвета
-Кучу мелочей (GPS, определение лиц, эффекты фото\видео и тд)
-В -25 работает отлично, проверено. Часов 5 снимали в дикий мороз - никаких...
Мякин Дмитрий
09.06.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + При максимальном разрешении 24 Мп минимальный уровень шумов, скорость съемки видео 60 кадров/с при разрешении FullHD, четкая работа HDR и систем шумоподавления и стабилизации, удобно ложиться в руки, в режиме серийной съемки честно отрабатывает 10 кадров в сек, отличный электронный видоискатель. Ну и конечно же, качество снимков. Это далеко не всё, просто отметил то, что для...
Дружбин Евгений
10.09.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Удобный, неприхотливый. Поворотный экран у зеркалки - это супер! Аккумулятор держит столько, что даже и не надо. Производитель может быть любой - мне всё равно. Главное - работает безотказно...
Andrestud
17.06.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Этот фотоаппарат - достоинство! Легкий, удобный , эргономичный! Размером не велик, удобные функции, отличное расположение кнопок.
- - Мало объективов, нестандартный разъём вспышки. Но читал в инете за 150р. можно приобрести переходник.
Работал на Olympus C-8080 потом перешёл на Canon 600D. Скажу сразу, Canon скорее похож на отечественный...
Созинов Евгений
11.08.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Отличный фотик, Большое количество различных режимов сьемки.
- - пока не выявил
все пишут что оптика кит отвратительная, смазывает углы и фиговый фокус, снимает просто отлично, фотографии очень сочные...
Скроменый эксперт
02.08.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Отличный аппарат за свои деньги. Поражает качество, дальнобойность объектива 55-200, скорострельность!. У него свой характер, нужно привыкать.
- - Автофокус иногда теряется в пространстве, но в нем есть MF.
Ниже...
Васильев Леонид
07.04.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Очень красивый. Идеален для девушек. Из рук не хочется выпускать. Очень удобно работать с различными проф режимами - на экране пояснение. Цвета абсолютно реалистичные - не ожидал. Масса настроек.
- - Похоже по удобству работы ни одна камера не сравнится со старым пленочным Олимпусом ИС 200. Не хватает кнопки "ближе-дальше". Объектив немного...
as Евгений
10.02.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + можно снимать на ISO 800,1600 без потери качества особого
пикинг при ручной фокусировки
эргономика
батареи хватает надолго - - пока не обнаружил разве что хочется иметь подстройку автофокуса.
До этого был фотоаппарат sony a330, по сравнениюс с ним цвета немного хуже у а65, но можно фотать на iso 800, 1600 и картинка...
Скроменый эксперт
21.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Ну что сказать, за свои деньги прекрассный аппарат.
Качественный, меню очень удобное, масса возможностей,новый процессор, отличная матрица,AF.
Поначалу хотел брать Canon но продавец отговорил,сказал что если брать то это. =) Масса возможностей. Скорострельная 10 кадров сек.Фильмы пишет...
rodionk93
17.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + 1) ну то что 24Мр радует.
2) аккума хватает где то на часа 2-3, но не помишает 2.
3) картинка на видео прекрасная.
4) в видео Af автомат это хорошо, но слышно когда просматриваешь видео.
5) Sony это реально качество хоть и цены они лубят завысить. - - 1) рукоятка немного маленькая мизинец можно сказать...
Скроменый эксперт
16.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I had a Sony A55 for just over two years. Unfortunately it failed twice and I've had to send it out for several weeks to a repair shop both times. I do think this is unusual and it is the first camera I've ever had that failed on me. I decided to step up to the A65 and keep the A55 as a backup. I'm a little miffed at Sony for the poor A55 reliability but I do think it isn't common. I'd have a hard time switching away from Sony. First I have a large investment in three lenses. Second I really like the translucent mirror technology and all it brings to the party. I think Sony is pushing the envelope and the camera has some really nice features.Here are my observations on the A65 compared to the A55.There are a number of web sites that you can use to compare the A55 to the A65 so I won't elaborate on the specification differences. But I did find some things about the camera that I had not read about, and of course there are my personal observations too.1) The weight difference between the lighter A55 and the A65 is quite noticeable to me. I used the A55 a lot and was very familiar with how it felt hanging from my wrist by the wrist strap. The truth is the three lenses I have add so much weight that the overall weight difference with the new body isn't really that much. I'll get over it.2) Size. The A65 is larger but not so much as to resemble one of the huge bodies of other DSLR cameras that just look obnoxious to me. The main benefit of the larger body is the hand grip now is comfortable. The A55 grip was initially too small for me (I think I have average man's hands) and it never felt better with time.3) The extra megapixels. I've never been chasing megapixels. I was quite happy with the image quality of the 16MP A55. So I was quite surprised when I took the first few photographs with the A65 and it's 24MP sensor. I was blown away with the quality improvement, something not born out by all of the technical reviews on the camera. After several hundred photos I've taken over the week I've had the camera I continue to be impressed. The other big benefit is I can crop images on my computer and still have really good image quality even if I've zoomed in 4x or so. Very nice.4) Expecting a lot from the OLED viewfinder that is so highly touted in the reviews it just didn't jump out at me. I'll have to wait until the A55 comes back from repair and compare the two. It does look larger but if I didn't know there was a published big difference I might not have noticed. I am quite pleased with both the A55 and A65 EVFs. After a week of use I have to say the EFV is good, but not so I marvel at it.5) Sony did move some buttons around a bit and for the most part I like the changes. The Video, AEL and tele-converter buttons are moved off the top a bit more and are easier to access and depress. The other buttons on the top of the camera near the shutter have been moved closer to the shutter so they are easier to access.6) I see Sony decided to put a dedicated ISO button by the shutter button, but they removed the D-Range button. This is a big disappointment to me. It may be that more sophisticated shooters play with ISO a lot but I don't do it often enough for a dedicated button on the top of the camera. On the other hand I did use the D-Range button a lot. I find a lot of high contrast shots are better handled by the Auto HDR feature. Gratefully I was able to reprogram the ISO button to activate D-Range but now my D-Range button is labeled ISO!7) I'm so glad the stereo microphone is colored black rather than the silver shown in many photos of the camera.8) The A55 has an infrared focus assist while the A65 uses the flash. I don't know which has better performance but I really like the infrared action over the flash. It is much more subtle.9) The On/Off button on the A55 has a nice crisp snap to it whereas the A65 feels soft and mushy.10) Placement of the small red Access Lamp (used to show when files are accessed on the SD card) is better on the A65. The A55 was too low and small. No big deal either way though.11) I REALLY like the shutter sound. The camera comes with the Front Curtain Shutter ON. When ON the first shutter action is electronic instead of the physical curtain moving. This means there is only one shutter sound per shutter release where as the A55 has a double click. The camera has a nice crisp sound for each photo. A big bonus is the shutter will have 1/2 the operations this way which should extend the life of the shutter. It was a fail of the shutter on the A55 which has it in the repair shop presently.12) When the A65 processes the Auto HDR images it takes much longer than on the A55. I suppose this is due to the larger image size. It is quite noticeable to me.13) I may be wrong about this but when reviewing images on the A55 holding the Zoom In button would automatically step through zooms until it reached the limit. On the A65 I have to manually push the button several times to effect the same result. I'll
Скроменый эксперт
04.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Got the camera body by itself rather than with the so-called "kit lenses" since I want to have a better choice of lenses than what comes in the kit.Along with this camera I purchased the following lenses and external flash unit: Sony 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM DT Telephoto Zoom Lens for Sony Alpha Digital SLR Cameras Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 Standard Zoom Lens for Sony A-Mount Cameras Sony 50mm f/2.8 Macro Lens for Sony Alpha Digital SLR Camera Sony HVL-F43AM Sony Alpha System HVL-F43AM Flash Unit for Alpha DSLRI didn't purchase everything at the same time so I'm still waiting for the macro lens and flash to arrive.I've tried the telephoto lens and the standard lens already but only on inanimate objects. The combinatin of the camera and these two lenses was fantastic! I'm hoping to do some portrait shots once the macro/portait lens arrive and the flash unit.I'm not a pro by any stretch of the imagination but do have some basic knowledge of photography. Like most people that are not making a living as a photographer, I cannot justify spending thousands of dollars on a camera body and thousands more on lenses so this camera and the lenses I bought fit my budget knowing full well I'm not going to see super professional results but the results are excellent for the money invested compared to other cameras.The only drawback I see so far is the somewhat high noise level with ISO settings of 1600 and higher. I'm trying to stay around a maximum of 400 ISO. I haven't tried the noise reduction feature yet so maybe wtih that I can get good results at least at 1600 ISO. I won't be taking that many photos in low light conditions and with the lenses I have I should be much better off than with the kit lenses in low light conditions.I'll add to this review as I get more experienced with the camera but for now I'm perfectly happy with my purchases.------------------------------------------------------------January 31, 2013 - Here is my follow up review after having received the Sony 50mm f/2.8 Macro Lens and Sony HVL-F43AM flash and having put more hours of use on the camera trying out various features.My wife and I and one of our daughters went to a local botanical gardens this past weekend (yeah, middle of winter is not the best time to look for flowers to photograph!) and I took along the camera with the 50mm f/2.8 macro lens mounted on the camera in hopes of finding insects and flowers on our hike thru the gardens. I did manage to find two bushes that had flowers on them (but no insects) and was amazed at the macro shots when I got back home and viewed them on the computer monitor! Colors were natural with no saturation problems and the image was very sharp in the focal plain region. Since the lens also is a 50mm fixed lens I took photos of the surrounding landscape and a few portrait shots of our daughter which turned out fantastic as well.The GPS feature of the camera is not mentioned in the owners manual beyond telling the user how to turn it on and off. I was clueless in what to look for to find the GPS location data until doing a bunch of searching on the Internet. As far as I can tell, the GPS data is not visible in real-time; it is only available AFTER you take a photo and shows up in the display of the camera when viewing stored images. The data is also embedded in the RAW and JPG files which can be used with Google Earth to show the location where the photo was taken. It may take about 10 minutes outdoors with the camera before the camera locks in on the GPS satellites in a fairly open space with some trees around. This feature was not on my list of features I was particularly looking for but it is nice to have.The Sony HVL-F43AM flash unit was tested out taking photos of our black cat and, using the macro lens, taking photos of some small troll dolls my sister-in-law wanted to sell on eBay. No complaints on the flash pictures or the flash unit.The panoramic photo feature was tried out and it did a very good job of stitching the photo frames together but because you have to continuously move (pan) the camera to use this feature there is, of course, some motion blur when you zoom in close in the resulting panoramic photo. This is a feature I don't see me using very often so this doesn't bother me.Battery life is great on the camera and I do recommend buying a spare battery if you are going to do a lot of photos at one time and can't wait for the battery to recharge. Be careful of Chinese made fake "Sony" batteries. I bought mine from B&H Photo since they do cary the real McCoy Sony battery (with Amazon you are taking your chances from what I have read in the reviews).The memory card I bought with the camera is the SanDisk model SDSDX-032G-AFFP which is working out real well for both video and 10 shots/second stills.BTW, I set the camera to store both RAW and JPG images just in case I'm not happy with the way the camera's JPG image is created. So far the JPG images have been excellent 90 percent of th
Скроменый эксперт
27.01.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
My previous camera was my first DSLR, a Sony A700. I always had to keep in mind that the viewfinder wasn't 100% accurate in terms of framing, but I loved that camera. It went around the world with me, and served me very well. When I started to hear about Sony's new prisms and electronic viewfinders (EVFs), I had my doubts. Call me old fashioned. I was particularly concerned about how it would perform in low light; photographing dance performances, for example.But I recently got an A65 at work, and also received one as a gift, and it didn't take me long at all to become a total convert. This is a great camera. It's smaller and lighter than my A700 was, but it still fills my hands well. If you have really big hands, you might find it a bit cramped, but for medium/average hands it should feel good.The sensor is fantastic. Doubling the megapixel count hits you in the hard drive, but you can crop the living daylights out of the image and still have fantastic quality. The focus performance is very good, and the button layout makes a lot of sense. It was a very smooth and easy transition from the older Sony. The autodrive speed is amazing; the prism is worth it's weight in gold if you need fast autodrive in a moderately priced camera.Now, on to the EVF. It's fantastic. The level is extremely useful to me; I don't know how much time I've spent straightening a photo by half a degree. No more. The best feature for me is focus peaking. I'd read about it, and it sounded interesting, but now that I've used it, it might be my favorite feature on this amazing camera. My right eye is a bit weak, and I never felt like I had the diopter set right on my A700, so I almost never used manual focus. Focus peaking, made possible by the EVF, shows you exactly which pixels are in focus. It's a fantastic feature. I'm using manual focus more than I even have, and getting great results. Yes, Sony has some of the best autofocus in the business, but there are times when manual focus is just faster, more intuitive, and more creative. And now, for me, it's very sharp and accurate too! I love sweep panorama and the tilting LCD, but focus peaking might just be my favorite feature on this camera. It's changed the way I shoot. Proofing photos without taking your eye away from the viewfinder (again, only possible with an EVF) is also great.So, I'm thrilled with this camera. If you've been wondering, or maybe skeptical, about the latest generation of Sony SLTs, take the plunge. I'm really, really glad I did.
Скроменый эксперт
14.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Sony A55 vs. A65: is Newer Really Better?When Sony released info on the Nex-5N, NEX-7, a65 and a77 models, I decided that the technological leaps on the new line was enough to make me a believer. What really put me into the Sony system over Canon and Nikon was the lower price points on the Sony lenses. Yeah, they don't have as many lenses as the Big Two, but I don't know any photographers with 25+ lenses in their closet, either. The NEX-5N looked nice but I like viewfinders and didn't want to be gouged on that accessory. The NEX-7--while pricey--still doesn't have a release date. The a65 was priced below the a77 by almost $500, so that was a no-brainer, but was it $200-worth more than the a55, a camera that--for the most part--touts a devout ownership?I actually bought the a65 and the a55 at the same time, opting for the a65 because of its corrected overheating issue while filming video (the tie-breaker for many) and the a55 because, aside from the overheating issue (a "logical" deal-breaker for many with the arrival of the a65), it offers just about everything else the a65 does, minus some cosmetic differences and a handful of megapixels most of us will never use or need.First, the differences. The a65's swivel LCD is a nice little touch over the a55's traditional vertical flip-out. With the rotating swivel I was able to take shots by holding the camera down low and high over my head. The LCD view on this unit is crystal clear. The electronic viewfinder on the a65 is superior to the a55. (**I'm not going to get into the differences between the OVF and Sony's EVF; if you are reading this, it's because you're either used to EVFs in general, don't mind them, or think Sony cameras are cool, regardless.) The EVF here offers a FULL view of my shots. Also, if you use the EVF instead of the LCD, there is a level meter that basically tells you if your shot is in focus, and if your horizon/vanishing points are perfectly level; this is invaluable if you're taking landscape or wide shots. When shooting people it eventually recognizes redundant faces and will instantly articulate in on the principle person you're shooting automatically if they are in a crowd or shot with multiple people; this I also found to be a rather nice innovation and would be tremendous if I were shooting a wedding and only cared about the bride, for example. The thing that I liked most about the a65 over the a55 however was completely unexpected: on the a65 there is a dedicated ISO button next to the aperture/shutter wheel, and next to it is a dedicated exposure button that will give you accurate adjustments in the EVF before you shoot. AWESOME. After a couple hours of shooting with this unit I could easily toggle between the Aperture, ISO and exposure intuitively by simply moving my finger slightly from one button to the next. In this regard, making on the fly adjustments while shooting on the street was a snap.One cosmetic/function quirk that really bugged me on the a65: the frame-zoom button is in a weird place. Located in the top right behind the wheel and shutter button, I kept hitting it by accident and it was quite annoying. I also didn't like how it basically took me a day and a half to 1) find the playback function for video and 2) toggle back and forth between video and regular picture playback mode. After two days I still didn't know how to download the video off of the card. It was like Easter egg hunting! Also, some of the novelty shooting camera modes looked like fun when I first powered up, but I quickly realised that the shooting potential of this camera was so great that I'd actually be doing a disservice by being too cute with the toy functions. The regular shooting and BW modes were all I truly needed to get really impressive results.The a55 by contrast shoots just a clip slowerŹŹ--though the AF is just as snappy--with little discernable difference, unless you put the camera in review mode to look at shots after you take them, then it sorta bricks out for longer seconds than its successor. (**On the a65 the review mode is default to OFF.) The a55 is also decidedly lighter in weight. I will note that because I have egregiously long fingers, it was actually a less comfortable handle than the a65, and I almost felt like the two models are specifically tailored to different hand-types. Actually, this is a BIG DEAL if you don't care about cute functions: if you have little hands and generally prefer light equipment, the a55 (at $200 less I remind you) carries more value in day-to-day carrying and shooting. If you have bigger hands, the a65 is an absolute must, you will thank me later.Finally, the video mode. On the a65 the quality on the 60i is far superior to anything I've ever seen on a DSLR, hands down. I actually wanted the a65 because it shot in "cinematic" 24p, but I can attest that compared to the 60i on this unit it left a lot to be desired. If you are mulling the a65 specifically because it has a 24p option, do yourself a
Скроменый эксперт
08.03.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I bought this camera having fallen in love with EVF. EVF at the beginning certainly looked impressive, a lot more clearer than Nikon or Canon. But as I used the camera for a couple of months I started getting uneasy with Sony. I tried to convince myself that may be I am not taking pictures correctly etc.but finally I decided to take some loss and sell the camera/lenses and buy Nikon 7100. I would say that that is my best decision in photography. Here are some salient points to consider:1) EVF feature adds a lot of clarity for sure. However it is hard to use it at night. One advantage of EVF is that you can view the pictures with full clarity in EVF which is not possible to do in Nikon.2) LIVE mode makes sense only in EVF as I see it. I hardly use it for Nikon as what you see in display outside does not resemble the picture. However what you see in EVF does. So you are more inclined to take pictures with LIVE shots in Sony.3) Video is significantly better in Sony. However if you need Video, get a Video camera, do not use expensive DSLR for videos4) Lenses for Sony/Minolta seem to be more cheaper than Nikon and they are of as high quality as Nikon/Canon5) The main issue I see with A65 is that color rendition is very poor. Colors are flat. Look unnatural in evening or sunlight condition. Also in portrait mode they tend to have reddish tinge while in sunlight they tend to have more yellow tinge. I first thought that I am adjusting colors but that is not the case. I expect the default photos to reflect the actual colors as your eye sees it. I did not succeed to make this work on Sony. So much so that every shot I took made be uncomfortable until I sold the camera. When EVF starts looking not what your eye sees and when pictures seem to have artificial colors unlike what our eye sees, if you are a bit obsessive, it makes you uncomfortable. To me, it reached a point when I decided to let go Sony and get Nikon and now I live in peace with colors.
Показаны отзывы 49-72 из 147.
