Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Alpha A3000 Kit

118 отзывов пользователей o Sony Alpha A3000 Kit

Пользовались Sony Alpha A3000 Kit?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Profile no image

Buzz Ray

08.10.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

  • + Результат фото и видео. Эргономика. Цена (взял за 9900 кит в интернет-магазине)
  • - вряд ли недостаток, но: чтобы получить нужную резкость в нужном месте кадра, зачастую приходится пользоваться ручной корректировкой фокуса после автонаведения.
Обзор больше предварительный, тем не менее, первые выводы сделать уже можно. Во-первых, выбор на форм-фактор пал осознанно. До этого был компакт со сменной оптикой Olympus. Фотки качественные, но держать было неудобно. Поэтому Нэксы отпали сразу же. На 3000 эргономика на высоте.
Во-вторых, аппарат сразу показал мой низкий уровень умения фотографировать и заставил погрузится в изучение фотонауки)))...
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Шарапов Игорь

01.06.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

  • + Матрица. При недостатке света с шумами все в порядке. Их практически нет. И самое главное - байонет Sony E. С SEL-50F18 можно делать практически идеальные портретные снимки. Впрочем...
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

кирильченко станислав

28.10.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

  • + Цена, матрица, объектив, удобный хват, видоискатель..
  • - Нагрев матрицы, концерт снять на видео (кусками по 30 мин) не получилось.В комплекте только зарядка по USB, но при зарядке работать с фотоаппаратом нельзя. Долгая зарядка по USB. Чтобы извлечь карточку или закрыть объектив при установленной бленде, нужно либо сломать пальцы, либо фотоаппарат. При фотосъемке ведет себя как зеркалка: громкий хлопок "зеркала?" и исчезновение изображения (но это же беззеркалка!) как...
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

18.11.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

  • + Отличный фотоаппарат!!! большая 20 мегапиксельная кропнутая матрица- это главное, удобный хват,надолго хватает заряда батареи, вспышка достойная,недорогая цена, запись видео не ограничена 30 минутами, пишет фул хд, 25 точечный автофокус!
  • - Существенных недостатков нет!!!
Касаемо видоискателя и дисплея люди...
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Стольникович Миша

29.11.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

  • + Приемлимое качество фото. Сравнительно малое количество шумов. Уже две недели хожу с данным аппаратом и пока что никаких нареканий. Для начинающего фотографа - самое оно! Большое количество ручных настроек радует так же, как и цена.
  • - Большой корпус как у зеркалки начального уровня. Это ведь беззеркалка! Корпус должен быть компактным, как у аналогичных моделей никон и кэнон.
    Но это дешевая камера — все в ней об этом буквально "кричит". Сборка неплохая, но материалы, ход клавиш, качество исполнения отдельных элементов — все это наводит на мысли об «эконом-классе».
Выпуск самой доступной камеры со сменной оптикой в исполнении Sony сопровождается простейшей идеей — максимальное качество съемки за свои деньги. Sony A3000 спрятана в неказистый и не слишком качественно исполненный корпус, слегка урезана функционально, оснащена слабым экраном и далека от компактности. Но при этом...
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

18.02.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

  • + Беззеркалка выглядит как зеркалка со всеми вытекающими последствиями (башмак, видоискатель, лучше садится на штатив), матрица, цена, понятное обучающее меню на русском языке, долгоиграющий аккумулятор.
  • - Посредственный жк-экран и ЭВИ, нет "горячих" кнопок, приходится копаться в меню, чтобы выставить например баланс белого, дорогая оптика.
Это мой первый более серьезный аппарат после двух мыльниц. Выбрал по совету профессионального фотографа, который посоветовал не брать дешевые зеркалки, т.к. качество снимков может разочаровать. Посоветовал присмотреться к беззеркальным аппаратам со сменной оптикой. Т.к. мне все таки хотелось, чтобы аппарат выглядел более-менее солидно выбрал эту модель. Уже прикупил телевик SEL-55210.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Кристина

28.04.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

отличная модель
Хорошая камера с APS матрицей и сменной оптикой. Камера мечты! Достоинств масса. Очень качественная сборка. Богатые функциональные возможности,позволяет полностью контролировать съёмочный процесс. Встроенная вспышка, видоискатель, диск выбора режимом. Небольшой вес и габариты,по сравнению с зеркалкой, позволяют брать её с собой, куда бы ты ни пошел. И снимать не привлекая к себе особого внимания. Но главное и неоспоримое достоинство -это возможность использовать практически любую оптику, любого производителя, через обычный не чипованный переходник. (Особенность всех камер именно Sony).
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

landco landco

07.05.2014

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

  • + Размер матрицы, цена
  • - Остальное
Отвратительный видоискатель - маленький и мутный. Нет четкого изображения, юстировка диоптрий не дает нужного эффекта. Практически неработоспособен, а значит, исчезает главный резон покупать эту камеру, как дешевую APS-C беззеркалку с ЭВИ...
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Грешнев Дмитрий

10.07.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

  • + Ни чем не уступает зеркалке ценой до 25 000.
    Сравнивал с Nikon D5100 Sony оказалась в разы лучше.
    железные крепления на штатив и...
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Анурин Сергей

05.01.2014

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

  • + особых нет, интегрированный в корпус "видоискатель" и "башмак" под вспышку, ну и относительно большая матрица характерная для данного класса...
  • - дешевый корпус чувствителен к пыле и влаге как и все пластиковые аналоги, нет привычного для Sony качества сборки. 2,5 кадра в секунду для 20 мегапикселей - это явно шутка маркетологов, которая будет мешать при разных видах съемки...
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Александра Колесникова

05.04.2014

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

  • + Видео превосходное
  • - Ощущение, что стабилизатор изображения отсутствует напрочь, фотографии детей вообще не получилось ни одной!!! Если фоткать, что-то статичное то неплохо, панорманый...
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Никита

17.02.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

отличная модель
Фотик можно купить спокойно не сомневаясь. Фотки четкие , даже получаются лучше чем на зеркалке.Много режимов фото. Недостаток один ,это не удобное расположение кнопок , но с этим смириться можно. Меня он устроил во всем, а самое хорошее его матрица на 20мп и максимальная фокусировка. Еще в нем очень внимательный видоискатель. Берите , не пожалеете.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Сергей

23.12.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

отличная модель
Приемлимое качество фото. Сравнительно малое количество шумов. Уже две недели хожу с данным аппаратом и пока что никаких нареканий. Для начинающего фотографа - самое оно! Большое количество ручных настроек радует так же, как и цена, неплохой вариант для начинающего фотолюбителя
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Алина

31.12.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

отличная модель
Купила недавно эту зеркальную камеру,очень довольна,быстро фокусируется,много возможностей,просто радует эта модель,и цена приемлемая для данного аппарата,не смотря на его способности.Дизайн очень аккуратный,и удобный. Всем советую в выборе данной модели.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Катрин

23.02.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

отличная модель
Отличный фотоаппарат,ни сколько не уступает профессиональным фотоаппаратам, многофункционален, прост в обращении, в общем советую.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Игорь

03.01.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

отличная модель
Оптимальное вложение денег в данной ценовой категории. Есть и лучше, но мне как не профессионалу очень понравился. Много настроек и главное все понятно.Качество снимков хорошее(особо еще времени не было с ним разбираться)
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Ирина

04.01.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

отличная модель
Купила данный фотоаппарат как подарок на Новый год.Все хорошо работает без шума,дочка быстро к нему привыкла(за один день), фоткает все и везде. Настраивает все быстро автоматом.И я советую только эту модель))))
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Евгения

23.12.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

отличная модель
Фотик классный, для домашней съемки лучше не найдешь, всем советую!!!
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Оксана

06.11.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

отличная модель
Классный фотик .....Изображения такие как и у зеркалок .
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Виталий И.

02.12.2019

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Хорошая модель
  • + Качество фото и Sony E маунт, то есть очень много оптики на неё подходит.
  • - Качество видео подкачало, но я особо его и не снимаю. Так же видоискатель отдает...
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

23.03.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I now have two of these A3000's....Unfortunately AMAZON is selling this camera for 60 to 70 dollars more than they should. This A3000 camera has several in-camera HDR options....again all in-camera...that create dramatic effects you would work your rear end off doing on the computer sandwiching a series of bracketed photos.I have used it in Sedona ...just stunning, jaw dropping HDR effects and hand held and easily done.......it is like the Sony A37 and others in the Alpha series re the HDR capabilities and the A3000 has an APS-C sensor ...so it immediately separates itself from so called fixed lens bridge cameras since they all have tiny sensors.How Sony can price a version of an SLR like this at this price (again Amazon is totally out of line in their price currently) is beyond me....even their small CYBER shots are more expensive and their NEX line doesn't offer built in view finders like this one which uses the same E mount lenses. The A3000 is kind of odd in that it is more in the Alpha series but then again it has a big foot in the NEX series because of the lens mount.. It is sort of like an A37 that uses E mount lenses instead of Sony/Minolta auto focus mount lenses!!!The A3000 differs from the A37 in other ways as well since a lot more of its functions are in the menu..So you MUST know the menu to be able to really get the most out of the A3000. It is much lighter and smaller than the A37. But it is just as capable giving on pause why they would pay almost double for the A58 which is commonly known as the A37's evolutionary offspring...This A3000 came to earth out of nowhere since it is an E mount camera but looks nothing like an NEX line of camera... It has been mentioned here that you can use old glass by using very cheap and easily found lens adapters like Canon EOS or Nikon to E mount...These sell from 12 dollars to 25 dollars on Amazon and EBAY.....Yes you lose the auto focus ability...but the vibration technology is in the body not the lens on Sony cameras. The meter system of course will still work by you setting the aperture on the lens and then the camera will automatically set the shutter speed. You have to tell the camera when you do this manual operation telling it that there is no lens on the camera which is an odd way of telling it to recognize the manual adapter...or a T mount adapter....You have to find that entry in the menu or else the camera will not work under these conditions unlike most other DSLR's in which you just mount these adapters and that's it... Not so with Sony.I have used this camera extensively at Joshua Tree and Sedona...re the HDR effects... I have used it with people in a patio setting with high contrast problems abounding and it does a spectacular job. The slats in the patio cover with the sun (yes we have had lots of sun in SOCAL this winter) created lines of high contrast areas but with the HDR working, it automatically resolved/mitigated that issue without the use of fill flash.....though of course that too is available with the A3000.I own a lot of Nikon pro models but carry these Sony cameras with me as well due to the sensor size and the HDR capabilities..Again this is the best SLR-like value in the history of digital cameras bar none since you can pick this up between 248-279 dollars pretty commonly right now.. This is stupidly under priced ...The 18-55mmm kit lens is perfect for most shooting situations....The only drawback is the LCD and EVF are not eye controlled like on the A37.....you have to push a button to switch between the two....the same FW50 battery is also used on the A37/A33 and others in the Alpha line.... (the A58 does NOT use the FW50 battery). You can pick up external 3rd party dual battery chargers as well for around 20 dollars on EBAY and possibly AMAZON since AMAZON has now caught on big time to making lots of camera accessories that you used to find only on EBAY...Amazon rocks in this regard from lens mount adapters to 3rd party batteries and battery chargers...One of the nicest features on this A3000 camera is that in manual mode, the EVF or LCD will show you EXACTLY what the the image will look like! You can let in more or less light by adjusting the shutter and/or aperture depending on the situation and you can see exactly what the final image will look like if not using HDR..... So you don't have to take a photo and then review it and then make adjustments....This Sony A3000 is kind of what you see is what you get...the A37 operates the same way.. Being able to see real time your adjustments taking place is just great......for example if you have the lens wide open and you reach too slow of a shutter speed, you can just change the ISO and it will then give you some more parameters to play with .......and the raising of the ISO number will brighten the image instantly on the EVF/LCD so you can start looking at grain issues though this camera is capable of mitigating that as well..automatically!Again...the in-camera HDR
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

30.11.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

And that is about all I think the language filters would allow me to quote from Stringer Bell’s (The Wire) observation regarding enthusiasm over a product or performance. As he noted, 20 degree days (smaller sensor P&S cameras, mobile devices) may make picture takers complain and frown while 50 degree days (entry level DSLRs, compact interchangeable lens cameras) often bring about a smile from photography hobbyists but no one talks or remembers 40 degree days (an arguably curious crossover like the A3000).Yet, here I am typing about it. It wasn’t immediately clear to me what market segment Sony aims to attract with this camera until I it dawned on me I’m right in the midst of it. No matter how I think I can slice it, fundamentally, I am a point and shoot user who is more interested in looking like I have some skills rather than actually devoting the time, effort and dedication required to refine my limited abilities with higher level equipment.In auto modes, the A3000 can produce some very good photos. It has the form factor of a DSLR with a competitive APS-C sensor but otherwise is deficient in comparable build quality although at the price point it is somewhat understandable. On the other side of the ledger, with the flexibility of interchangeable lenses and the features of LCD and EVF, for me potentially it could be a step above most comparable P&S competition, with the caveat the prospective buyer has to understand exactly what they are getting since in auto mode specifically, I don’t believe definitively superior Image quality will be realized.The mirrorless A3000 is lightweight, in my opinion as comfortable in that regard as any bridge I have tested. It can use the Sony E-mount lenses, somewhat of a mixed blessing since I also think they are rather pricey. With an optional adaptor, A-mounts may also be used. That is a major consideration, since as noted above with the included 18-55mm lens only, I didn’t feel breadth of functionality and overall image quality justifies taking this camera instead of my Pentax X-5 on an upcoming trip.Other factors are the viewfinders as at 230K pixelation neither the non-tilting LCD nor low resolution EVF are very impressive. The latter plastic housed component also may present some problems for eye-glass wearers. Additionally, I have yet to get a diopter setting with it I am happy with and rear positioned control setting wheel seems comparably minimalist compared to others I have used.Most functions have to be accessed via a menuing system that seems a bit tedious to me. It might be merely what I have become accustomed to but as the power switch is positioned in exactly the same location as the zoom switch on the Pentax, I have already turned off the camera a few times when I forgot which body I had in hand (they are very similar in size and weight) and thought I was about to zoom in on a subject. Also, while there is a quality drop off with the Pentax, at 10fps compared to the A3000’s 3.5 fps in burst shooting, which one I would opt for with motion shots is a toss-up, although for panoramic shots, the A3000’s relatively quiet shutter is impressive. I found both AF and low light performance very good. It also features a built-in flash and hot shoe housing.I’m not sure Sony’s engineers were any more certain of who ultimately they were targeting either since images cannot be saved in RAW format independently. It seems to me any user who elects to use RAW and manipulate thereafter would find the requirement to save in JPEG as well an unnecessary annoyance. This camera will produce great everyday photos with the base kit and has features that will allow those who are interested in more flexibility than is typically the case with most point and shoot cameras to upgrade their equipment without being initially overwhelmed, but for the experienced DSLR user this model is most likely one that can be passed by.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

15.09.2013

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I won't go into all the features because you can find that information elsewhere.Upon picking up the camera, the first thing I liked was the feel. It's the perfect sized travel camera for someone used to a bigger DSLR while having a comfortable, deep recessed, rubberized grip. The included 18-55 zoom feels mechanically solid for a kit lens, and it's also fairly sharp corner to corner. There's very little geometric distortion or chromatic aberration.Shooting stills in low light, the shots are amazingly clear with very little noise. In decent light or with flash, the photo quality is amazing for a 400 dollar camera. Pretty much in the top ten list in this price range. It's also quick to turn on and shoot the first shots. If you're buying this to shoot primarily stills, you'll be very happy. It's good enough and fast enough for anyone but a hard core pro. You'll have the usual gamut of full auto, full manual and many combinations in between.The first videos I shot were at night in a well lit downtown open air mall. What I observed through the view screen was stunning. The stabilizer isn't very good at damping out motion from walking, but it's fine for stabilizing shots while you're standing still. Looking at the well lit video shots on a computer at 1920x1080, I was impressed. The autofocus tracked accurately and silently, and the auto white balance always kept the colors true. Depth of field, while not film-like, was better than most video cameras. Edge sharpness was better than my Alpha 57, but saturation looked more video-like than film-like. Again, you can use full auto, full manual or several combinations in between. Your outdoor vacation shots will simply be amazing. It shoots video better than most cameras under 1000 dollars, especially if you go through the menu and turn off some of the automatic features. So why the three stars?When I shot some indoor footage at home, I was expecting decent results, and a first quick look didn't disappoint. But as I looked with a practiced eye, I saw blue vertical lines throughout the image on all my indoor footage. Granted, they are very subtle and in very soft focus, but they are there regardless of the camera settings. I noticed them particularly when slowly panning against solid colored areas like a plain wall. At fist, I thought it might be an interaction with my LED room lights, but this was dispelled when I saw the blue bars in the outdoor footage as well, just not as prevalent. This may be a subtle problem, and many viewers may never notice it or be bothered by it unless it's brought to their attention. But to me, it means I could never use this camera for footage I intend to use in a project. The blue bars are caused by what is known as fixed pattern noise in the image sensor. It's not something you can solve by a firmware upgrade or by replacing it with another camera of the same model. While fixed pattern noise exists to some extent in any image sensor, it is usually mistaken for grain and not visible as a pattern of vertical lines.Another huge disappointment is there is no HDMI port. I like to hook the camera to a TV to set up various parameters and see the live results as I make changes. No can do with this camera. It also means you can't immediately play back footage from the camera on a TV until you edit it and put it on a disk or an SD card if your TV has a slot. There is also no external mike jack, so you are relegated to using only the built in mikes.Sound quality is clear, but there is no means of making any adjustments to the volume or turning off the AGC. However, the AGC does a good job bringing down the levels of loud music without distortion.In conclusion, the image quality is excellent on this camera aside from the aforementioned sensor noise. That may not be noticed in outdoor shots, and may not be objectionable enough to most users on indoor shots.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

06.02.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

My first impression is that the A3000 is a 5-star camera. My last camera (PowerShot G15) was unceremoniously retired when I had to jump into a lake. Before that, I owned a Nikon D90 with a Nikkor 50mm 1.4 and 24mm 2.8D.The Canon was a great camera with a great lens, but my wife and I were always disappointed with its image quality vs. what we'd had with the D90. It (the G15) had all of the manual control I could ask for but lacked punch in low light situations. Also, its sensor size vs. that of the D90 was quite underwhelming. Abysmal, really.So, the Canon was drowned but, due to my having purchased a warranty, I was reimbursed for the current value of the camera. I went to the store expecting to get the Sony Nex-3N, but saw this camera. I will take a low-res EVF over no finder any day of the week.Regarding that: I have seen detractors of this camera for its low-res EVF and display. Those things don't bother me, as I don't spend very much time on composition and just like to ensure that everything that I want to capture in the frame is there. Don't expect to be impressed by the LCD on the back, either.Besides, the thing that matters is the output. Looking at the photos on the computer, quality is great. Even ISO 3200 images look good enough for snapshots or other casual shooting.The camera is not fast compared to DSLRs, but it's fast enough. Because there are not many external controls, you have to go through menus to access settings. It takes a little more time but that's fine with me. If i want manual control, it's there... but as time goes on, I want to spend less time on all of that and more time on composition. Sony's iAuto setting seems capable enough. However, everything about it (except maybe the AF) seems sluggish in comparison to the Nikon, though that may not be an entirely accurate nor objective statement.As far as build quality goes, this camera is very light and doesn't feel like there's much to it. I suspect that is because there *isn't* very much to it. At this price point, I feel as though I've paid for an excellent image sensor and the basic means by which to get light there. I think the minimalist nature (and not minimalist in the same way as a Leica, obviously) is very nice.It doesn't necessarily feel cheap, either. I worked in a camera shop for 5 years and handled plenty of entry-level DSLR's (including the original A33 and A55 SLTs), and this feels no less capable durable than any of those. Having said that, it by no means feels rugged. I wouldn't drop it, and would invest in any drop and spill protection. It might survive a knock or two, though.The playback mode doesn't auto-rotate the image (or if it does, I haven't found that setting). In playback, you can choose to rotate the photos manually. Also, the inability of the camera to switch back and forth to the finder automatically can be a little aggravating when you have to press the Finder/LCD button up top. Oh well. Again, this is just the sensor and the basics to get your image there. Lens is capable enough too. It was able to satisfactorily resolve some geese about 50 yards away when zoomed all the way (both with the lens and with the zoom function in playback).Memory Card: Sandisk Ultra 8 gig. Great cards.Bag: Lowepro Hatch Back 16L. Great bag with the all-important AW cover.
Отзыв предоставлен
Показаны отзывы 25-48 из 118.

Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой

9.8/10 баллов

Nikon Z6 Kit

115 отзывов

от 276890.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-7M3 Kit

189 отзывов

от 185000.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Canon EOS 5D Body

645 отзывов

от 114051.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Nikon D6

107 отзывов

от 1369231.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Canon EOS 50D Kit

170 отзывов

от 1075533.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Canon EOS 600D

593 отзывов

от 35750.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-6400

184 отзывов

от 124090.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Nikon D3100

1621 отзывов

от 32617.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Canon EOS 1100D

472 отзывов

от 24990.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Pentax K-1 Mark II Kit

724 отзывов

от 448990.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Panasonic Lumix DC-S1H

89 отзывов

от 229990.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-7M4

77 отзывов

от 214990.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 100D

103 отзывов

от 173310.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Fujifilm X-T30 II Kit XC15-45mm, серебр

77 отзывов

от 142690.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

314 отзывов

от 49900.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 7D Kit

542 отзывов

от 36000.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 30D Body

236 отзывов

от 31151.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Nikon D5

1290 отзывов

от 30900.00 руб.

9.4/10 баллов

Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 Kit

128 отзывов

от 357309.00 руб.

9.4/10 баллов

Canon EOS R Kit

138 отзывов

от 249990.00 руб.