Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D90 Kit
1022 отзывов пользователей o Nikon D90 Kit
Пользовались
Nikon D90 Kit?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
22.03.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
If you are considering buying this camera, do not think too much. It is an EXCELLENT camera. It is not big but feels solid and, most important, it is so well built! it is and feels like a pro camera. It is light but very well balanced, therefore, a large lens such as the 70-200 fits it well; obviously, in this particular set up, the lens centers the weight. I use the live-view all the time to frame my pictures best. I seldom use the "video" or the sound recording. It has great things such as the sensor cleaner that could be programmed. I have lots of photographer friends who keep a D90 as their main camera. Beginners need to know that It takes time to learn to operate this camera it is not an aim and shoot type of camera. You will need a lot of pictures taken before you feel comfortable with your D90.
Скроменый эксперт
10.07.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Great entry level camera for a the enthusiastic armature. Easy enough to use right out of the box with enough features to keep you interested an exploring the cameras capabilities. Note that the DX sensor produces a digital crop 1.5x (this explains it better than I ever will [...], but if you are looking at an entry level price range for DSLR digital crop is unavoidable. Very happy, will recommend this camera to anyone.
Скроменый эксперт
08.12.2008
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've been using a point and shoot camera for about 5 years now - I'm by no means a photographer, just an average dad trying to take some pictures. My son recently turned one and I've been finding it more and more difficult to capture those precious moments. I press the button on my point and shoot....delay...missed the shot. Also whenever I take photos indoor I've found they are always blurry or noisy, just not very good. So I elected to get a Digital SLR camera - wow they are expensive! I did very extensive research before making the most important decision. Which one do I get??? I decided to narrow my search to Canon and Nikon, the two top brands. I was considering the Canon Xsi, Canon 40D, and Nikon D90. I quickly decided the Xsi was not for me. On paper it looks great. It has a ton of great reviews and I'm sure it takes amazing pictures. The price was the cheapest of all the cameras I was considering. After visiting Best Buy and actually trying the cameras out the xsi felt like a toy compared to its big brother the 40D. Also the kit lens was very disappointing as far as zoom capabilities. I did like the 40D a lot. The body seems really solid and well build (even more so than the D90). I loved the 6fps rapid shooting (although I can't imagine I would every really need to shot quite that fast). The kit lens seems like a huge improvement over the wimpy one on the xsi. The camera seemed good to me but after picturing my wife using it, it seemed just a tad to "big and heavy". Some people might disagree. The D90 had a few features that really appealed to me. One of the main things I really liked about the D90 was the beautiful 3" VGA screen for reviewing. This screen was a big reason why I went with this camera over the Canon models. It's the same size but has 4 times the resolution. Why would you care about this? It's just really nice when you take a shoot you can immediately tell if you got it or not. With the canons I found you had to either zoom in or download to the computer before you could really tell if the photo came out well. The D90 also just had a lot of other tricks up its sleeve that I thought were nice. There is a HDMI output to hook this baby up to your fancy HDTV. The camera also has built in software that creates an animated slideshow of your pictures for viewing on the TV. Again, doesn't really effect image quality but it's a cool feature. There's also some neat post processing you can do right on the camera including red eye removal, black and white filter, or tilt the picture if you accidentally took it at a slight angle. Of course there is the movie mode also (lack of auto focus makes this feature a little disappointing actually). One final selling point for the D90 over the 40D was the kit lens. For me the kit lens is very important because I don't really plan on purchasing a bunch of different lenses and swapping them out all the time. I just want a decent "all purpose" lens. The 40D's 28-135mm kit lens just felt a little to "zoomed-in" for me. After playing with it I wanted to be able to zoom out more but was unable to. The D90's 18-105 feels like a pretty good range for me (keep in mind that these cameras have a 1.5 multiplier built in). The best advice I can give is to go try the cameras out before you order one. Just go with the one you feel most comfortable with, trust your gut. I've been very happy with my D90 but I'm sure all of the cameras I was considering would have been a huge step up from a point and shot.UPDATE 12/3/12Still really happy with this camera. It takes amazing pictures and has held up very well. I would buy it again no questions asked.
Скроменый эксперт
19.11.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
First off I want to say that I have used this camera for a year now. I am a semi pro, which means I earn a little on the side with photography. I also upgraded from a D50 to this camera. I originally wanted to upgrade to the D300 but for the price and what I use it for I decided to go with the D90. Almost the same sensor and I really didn't need the tank build of the 300. The weather proofing would have been nice though.So far I have been very pleased with my choice. The low light capability up to 3200 iso is fantastic. 6400 is pushing it though. It focuses quickly in lowlight. The body fits comfortably in my hand without it feeling too small like the D40/60/5000. It may feel a bit small if you have large hands though. The battery life compared to my D50 is fantastic. The battery, however, is a bit slower to get out if I need to change quickly. You actually have to pull it out instead of it sliding out practically on it's own. The display in the back is awesome. It may actually be too bright though. I have done alot of Fight promo shots on black backrounds where it's hard to use the histogram to see if your lighting is right. On the display they looked good. Once downloaded I had to boost the exposure by as much as 1 stop. I really can't review the jpg setting as I always shoot in RAW. As far as RAW goes, I read a post on here where someone complained that all his software didn't support the new raw format. No need to buy new software, just download a small file from the Nikon website that allows compatibility with most software. The adobe site has it also. I LOVE the "My Menu" feature.As far as the video goes. If you are buying this camera for videoing, don't. It's a nice little gimmick and can be convienient to use in some instances, but it's not a video camera. If you want to video, buy a video camera.I have had a few problems with this camera. The most annoying is when it just stops working because it thinks no lens is attached. I have really only had this problem with my Tamron lenses and can't remember it happening with the Nikons. It was easily fixed by unseating then reseating the lens. I have also lost autofocus with the Tamrons and it was fixed in the same way. When you are actually working with a client this can be both embarassing and annoying. This is the biggest reason I gave this camera only 4 stars.Bottom line is this is a fantastic camera for both beginners and advanced photographers. [...]
Скроменый эксперт
03.08.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Had this for two years now and even though it's being phased out, I'd still keep it and won't be upgrading for a while, It serves me well and I've never had any single issue/problem with this camera, I love using it for landscape, portraits and macros. Awesome camera!
Скроменый эксперт
11.01.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Picked up the camera when it first came out, and over 15,000 shutter releases later (according to my EXIF photo data), I couldn't be happier with this purchase.Ergonomics: First, the camera has enough weight to it and curves to your hand to just feel solid when you are holding it. After playing around with settings, buttons, wheels, and walking through the manual to read up on everything, I slowly became competent at getting my camera into the right setting for the shot with one hand.Pictures: The low light performance at ISO 3200 is incredible, and combined with the 4.5FPS mode, I've nailed some awesome pics at evening football games from the stands. The pre-set color settings, and built in editing (mostly crop & straighten) definitely speeds up my post-production. The Autofocus took a while to master (center, zone, 3D), but works well now that I have the hang of it. My friends and colleagues are blown away by my shots, but that's more a result of getting some direction on composition from friends and doing lots of culling of the bad ones.Video: Manually refocusing a video mid-shot is a pain. The contrast/brightness/white balance adjustments mid-video can get a bit odd as well. It is a bit rough, but can still produce some nice results if you have a unipod, and not a ton of motion with your subjects. For the most part, video has just been a toy, as I haven't attempted anything serious with it. My $180 Canon SD780IS does better job overall with video, but I can't put a f/1.8 on that, and play around with the focus to get a neat hollywood effect.Lenses/Extras: The lens selection for Nikons is nice (have since picked up a 50mm f/1.8, and a 55-200mm VR to go along with the kit 18-105mm, but envy the Canon 55-250mm IS lens at its similar price point to the nikon 55-200mm VR), and the auto-focus performance on the kit 18-105mm lens is pretty fast. The SB-400 was a nice addition (lets me bounce light for indoor shots and get some good results), but using my f/1.8 without a flash has been a better low light solution, even though the color requires more retouching. In retrospect I would have gotten the D90 with the Nikkor 18-200mm VR instead as changing glass is a nuisance.
Скроменый эксперт
31.03.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
This is the first time I have used anything but a point and shoot. I have been wanting a DSLR since I visited a friend with a Canon Xti and took some great pics of my child. I thought getting any DSLR would "work" and bought a Sony A230. I was so not satisfied and read that maybe the lens would help. Still not happy with the pics so I took it back and after extensive review bought the D90. The pics I am taking with this thing are outstanding. I bought the $100 potrait lens, the exposure books and some Nikon D90 guides. I still am deciding between a telefoto lens, between the 55-200mm or the 70-300mm. I also did a 30 day trial with lightroom and decided to buy it. Since buying this camera a month ago and learning all I could to do portraits, I have actually been asked for the copyright of the pics I took of my daughter and her baby brother because the photo guy thought a professional had done the pics. I also have been asked to take a pic for my friends article in a sports magazine. I knew nothing about photography before this. I've never adored a piece of equipment before where I thought if I could only save one thing in a fire it would be obvious what I would save until I got this camera. I would save the D90 (after people and pets of course). I L-O-V-E this camera.EDIT - it's been a year and I've used this camera a lot. I have found a big problem with my camera that I have seen various photographers complain about that doesn't appear to be user error. This camera can have a very soft focus or misplaced focus. I have found that toggling to focus does not work on this camera. I have used a 50mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, and an 85 mm 1.4 and all have had the same issues. I transfered the pictures through ViewNX which shows you where the focus was aimed at and seen pictures where the focus is sharp on the pants when the focus was on the eyes. The auto focus is very hit or miss.
Скроменый эксперт
21.10.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The D90 has been reviewed many times on Amazon, and some of those reviews are highly detailed and lengthy and go into lots of the technical specifications. Mine will be brief. I had the D80 for a few years prior to purchasing the D90. I enjoyed it a great deal, but I sold it and upgraded to the D90. It was definitely worth it. While the high ISO quality is better than that of the D80 by a perceptible but not great margin, for me the most noticeable difference was truer color, particularly in mixed/difficult lighting conditions. It may be that in the intervening time, I've learned more of the nuances of tweaking white balance settings, but I truly do not think that that accounts for all of the difference. Even at times when I don't have time to fiddle and futz with using a custom setting, I just seem to get truer colors with the D90. If you look at some of the online photography review sites, you will find evidence to back that up. I don't know how soon Nikon may be coming out with another camera, but I intend to stick with this one for a long time. I think you really can't go wrong with the D90 unless you are a pro and need an extremely rugged camera or one with an even higher frame rate.
Скроменый эксперт
19.09.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have had several SLR bodies from Nikon and I have to say I feel very pampered with the D90. The Auto ISO and ADR (Adaptive Dynamic Range) make all forms of shoot SO much more convenient than a SLR that does not have these features. I truly can not imagine stepping backwards from these features. I love how high the ISO can go without showing obvious noise. I set Auto ISO to max out at 3200, set my aperture as large as I can get away with and just start shooting.The build quality is awesome. Nikon bodies just feel substantial in my hand. Every low to mid level body made by Canon feels like a cheap toy in my hands, but not my D90.This camera will soon be replaced by some newer body, but if you have the opportunity to buy this used or on the cheap DO SO! You will not regret it. Even if a new model brings better video features (which would be very welcome) the camera traits of the replacement surely would be only baby steps better. From what I have seen of the D7000 which is actually a higher level model, I can say there is no (non-video) feature that is a leap in convenience or image quality.If you don't believe me Ken Rockwell has some awesome statements about this camera. Read what he says at KenRockwell.com. If all of these other comments have not convinced you then maybe he will.
Скроменый эксперт
04.12.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this as an upgrade from a D60, because the D90 added a few features I was really missing with the the D60 (namely the better AF system, Live view, and built-in Commander mode), and much improved shooting controls. The ability to change just about any setting, even metering modes and enabling the IR remote, without diving into menus is wonderful, and was sorely missing from the D60. It's much more enjoyable, and easy, to shoot and get good pictures when the setting you want is easily available.A few other good/bad points:-The flash doesn't pop up automatically, except in 'Auto' mode, and even then you can disable the flash with the flash button and command dial. The D60 seemed to always want to use the built-in flash unless it was in daylight.-You can turn auto-ISO off in every mode, including 'Auto'. My only complaint here is that while you can select auto-ISO with the ISO button and command dial in 'Auto' mode, you can't in P/S/A/M, unless you have auto-ISO turned on overall, which prevents you from setting the ISO yourself.-For some reason, you have to go into the menus, or use the Function button, to select the AF area mode. You can select between continuous AF, single-servo AF and AF-Auto with the AF button and command dial, but the sub-command dial does nothing. It would be nice to use the AF button/sub-command dial to select between the AF area modes, rather than having to use up the only programmable button for it. Not really a big deal, but there's no need for it to be that way.-The AF/MF switch on the body is great. I assume it's to turn the built-in motor on and off for screw-drive AF lenses, and it also disables autofocus with AF-S lenses. I like being able to just flip that switch to turn the AF off, rather than having to mess with the tiny switches on the lens and hope I don't turn VR off or something.-A menu option to disable video recording would be nice. The video mode is practically useless anyway, and that would keep me from worrying about hitting the OK button while moving the focus point in LV and accidentally recording a movie.No huge complaints, and the few I mentioned could easily be fixed with a simple firmware update. Otherwise, I can't think of anything that I'd change, even compared to the heavier, much more expensive D300s.
Скроменый эксперт
06.05.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I am a nikon snob. I currently have 3 nikon cameras. Love them all. The D90 is perfect for my needs. I love taking pictures, mostly nature, flowers, insects, lots of 90 mm macro photos. This camera works beautifully. Plenty of features, breathtaking images (with the right lenses, of course), easy to use. I paid about $750 with shipping. Wouldn't have considered another brand after owning a nikon 6006n for years. I bought this one in anticipation of our first born child. Well worth the money.
Скроменый эксперт
12.05.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I just upgraded my D40 with D90. The body is big and we have more controls over than D40. I don't see much difference in this new upgrade. Better don't need to upgrade those who don't need more mega pixel & movie feature. I could get good pictures in D40. They could improve D-movie feature more professional. I see more issues while recording D-movie (Flickers,Noises,Auto focus,More heat on battery side,more vibrations) But Still it works good on taking photographs.
Скроменый эксперт
23.05.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
We have both a D300 and the latest addition is the D90 which replaced a D100 that finally died. The D300 is a fabulous camera well worth every penny. HOWEVER you can have a D90 which is just as nice and nearly as functional as the D300 for a lot less money. The D90 has 70% of the D300 features and they just happen to be the features we use. Seriously, do yourself a favor and think long and hard when choosing a D300 over the D90.
Скроменый эксперт
16.08.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I don't have much to add about the camera itself. It is stellar. Image quality and dynamic range are superb.However, a reviewer below comments that it could be worth waiting for the D90's replacement, which is due out sometime this fall (or maybe later). There is a strong case for not waiting and picking up the D90 now. First, the price may not actually go down that much after the launch of the successor. Like the D40, the D90 is a milestone camera that will likely continue to be in demand even after its official product life is over. The D40, which itself has been discontinued for many months, is currently sold by various sellers on Amazon for a couple of hundred MORE than the last official MSRP. This is simply a function of supply and demand, and the same may be expected for the D90 over time because of how highly it is regarded. Second, while a new model usually has desirable new features - and there is no reason to think the D90 replacement will not have improvements over the D90, especially with respect to video capability - it may be worth waiting for the launch hype to subside, take in a few in-depth reviews, and wait for any initial firmware updates.In a nutshell, the D90 is a great camera, regardless of what will come after it. Unless more advanced video capability is a must-have, there is not much reason to miss out on shooting with the D90 now.
Скроменый эксперт
04.03.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've had the D90 for about a month and can't recommend it highly enough. My main camera for the last 4 years has been a Nikon D50. I also have an assortment of Nikon Af & af-d lenses, and I wanted to continue to use them (the D5000 lacks the necessary motor for the older lenses to autofocus). I shoot a lot of live theatre, and so low-light/high iso performance is important to me, and the D90 delivers extremely well up to 1600. Noise is well-controlled, and looks a lot like film grain. Once you learn how to mess around with the picture controls in the menus, jpegs can look stunning. Raw NEF files seem to need less processing after than the ones from my D50. The screen is big, bright & colorful. There are a ridiculous number of custom settings for almost every function, which means you can do a lot to configure the camera to the way you like to shoot. There are a lot of buttons & two wheels--almost too many controls--but with a little practice you can access almost any function you're likely to need in the act of shooting without menu-diving. I also do a lot of flash photography, and the highly-variable ISO control in conjunction with the ease of tweaking the white balance means a lot less time fixing color in Lightroom or photoshop.It also has Live View--but I'm not so crazy about that function. The autofocus in LV is slow, and taking a shot is noisy one loud click when the mirror gets out of the way, then the shutter, then the mirror jumping out of the way again (I think...). One other niggle: the multi-point autofocus doesn't work so well in low-contrast situations--ever since I changed it to the center point, I've never had a focus problem. I haven't shot any moving subjects yet, which is what it's designed for. I also haven't used the video function--newer cameras have much better implementation of this feature. In short: beautiful images, customizable, many pro features at a consumer price. Don't hesitate.
Скроменый эксперт
25.09.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I am new to photography and new to the world of digital slr camerasthe camera is easy to use for the beginner and in discussions with other owners most just leave in auto mode when shooting picturesI went to dslr because most of my crtical shots are taken during my daughter's musicals where there is very low light conditions and the compact digital cameras just can't deal with the low lightin just about any condition other that the theatre the camera is smarter than me and I use fully auto or I'll use sport mode for soccer and other fast action situationswhat you must keep in mind is the importance of your lens for example I was not able to get pictures any better at the theatre with the kit lense than I could with my wife's coolpix 8000 that is why I ended up returning my initial purchase of the d90 kit and purchased just the bodyI then purchased a used nikon 2.8 80-200 zoom lens and a new nikon 1.8 55mm lensthe d90 has many features that most will never use but there are many lenses that fit this body which makes it versitalI like the feel of and it is easy to hold and change settings while shootingif you are new to photography I highly recommend a class prior to purchasing a camera this way you'll know what is best for you
Скроменый эксперт
28.03.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Purchased the D90 to replace a D70. The primary features that were desired was greater ISO rating, larger playback LCD display and in camera image management and review. I found all of these features to be a significant improvement for photo shooting events. I was also pleased with a number of the improvements in the on camera button control features. They were more intuitive and functionally placed for ease of the photographer. Overall it was very similar to the D70 so the learning curve was greatly accelerated. Have used on two major events that I really was greatly a benefit to shoot with the D90.
Скроменый эксперт
10.08.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
It's like I've entered a whole new world of photography. I love how fast this camera is, and I couldn't be happier with the photos it takes.
Скроменый эксперт
21.10.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've owned a point and shoot camera for 2 years now, and I have always been jealous of the quality and versatility of DSLR cameras. I didn't want to chunk down $1K on a camera without knowing about them, so I did a lot of homework. Before purchasing the Nikon D90 w/ kit lens, I researched several web sites along with other photographers and artists alike. All sources pointed to the Nikon brand for it's high quality build, reputation and ease of transition from newbie beginner shots to the professional arena. I opted for this model in lieu of previous cheaper Nikon's so I can use older glass prime lenses with the D90, thus potentially saving me money in the future when it comes to buying different lenses. The kit lens is an excellent beginner lens, however after 500 or so pictures, I can see it's limitations, and will be looking for a 50mm f/1.4-f1.8 lens for better portrait pictures. I would not, however, go and buy a ton of expensive lenses before you use the kit lens and determine if it is enough for you or not. I searched several competitor web sites and stores and Amazon offers the best price for this kit. Other web sites are roughly $120-200 more for the same kit (October 2009). I knew that a camera of this caliber would be a challenge, so I bought a book on digital photography specifically around the D90 prior to purchase. I have the grasp of the basic functions, and regular day pictures, however night photography is a little trickier. I would highly recommend a tripod if you plan to shoot a lot in low light conditions. Even though the camera has VR, it does not fix all movement/exposure issues in low light conditions.MAIN PROS:- Great price- Ease of use (with basic features)- Interchangeable with older lenses for better future value- Live View- Great 12.3 megapixels for very sharp photos- In camera photo editing- Shoots in RAW & JPEGMAIN CONS:- Nikon software is TERRIBLE! I use a Mac running 10.6 snow leopard and the software crashes constantly. Nikon's web site has no solution for this, even after the software supposedly updates itself after install. Apple's Aperture, iPhoto and Adobe products have no problem recognizing the camera and quickly importing the photos.- Kit does not include a SD card, therefore preventing you from taking pictures right out of the box. Prepare to make a run to the store for a minimum of 4GB SD card (takes about 1K JPEG photos).
Скроменый эксперт
04.12.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is my second D90. It is of the same quality as my first. I'm a professional wedding photographer and the D90 meets or exceeds my wedding photograhy requirements...It is an excellent camera for portraiture (when used in combination with Nikon's CLS). I bought another D90 before the D7000 was available simply because I don't think the 7000 is significantly better than the D90 except for the addition of a few more pixels in the same size sensor. That does not yield better photo quality than the D90 at 12.2 mp. Admittedly the 7000 has a higher framing speed but I don't think it's significantly higher to warrant the extra cost. In essence, my opinion is that both are excellent cameras and why not save a few hundred while you can. Wedding photography produces a large number of images and the last thing I need at this point in time is larger file sizes when I'm ultimately going to re-size the "finals" back down to around 6 mps for the couple's DVD. "Good on ya" Nikon!
Скроменый эксперт
06.04.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I am a professional photographer and I bought this on a whim when I was in Hawaii a few years ago. It's probably too big for most moms to carry around but it's very lightweight in comparison to what I usually lug around. I haven't used it to shoot client sessions but my daughter has and she's gotten amazing results. I love having it and I take it everywhere. The video is really fun. The images are beautiful and you can get really nice prints. This kit is a great value and you can play forever trying different angles and settings. Cristy [...]
Скроменый эксперт
21.05.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I don't usually write reviews, but this product was just awesome. I was very skeptical at the beginning because I read other reviews saying that the camera would get error messages when attaching the lens to the body, but I still ended up buying the product. I've had my Nikon D90 for about 4 months now and haven't had any problems at all. I've also taken at least 1000 shots already.
Скроменый эксперт
21.01.2011
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Per product description, I expected D90 could drive my old Nikkor AF zoom lens. It can, but unfortunately not the whole range. For example, it cannot drive my AF zoom lens of 70-210mm. It's not totally compatible with all Nikkor AF lens. Also, for those ones it can drive, it works at only one aperture setting.Another feature I looked for in this model was the LCD display of live-view. However, D90 needs a button to turn on the live-view. The button is at an inconvenient position. To take the photo, we need to press the button to shut off the live-view first. This is a clumpsy operation. Canon uses a photo-sensor to perform the same operation, which is much smarter than Nikon in this sense.D40 uses a CCD sensor. However, D90 goes backwards to use a CMOS sensor. Is it a compromise for cost?
Скроменый эксперт
27.08.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Flat out...the D90 is one excellent camera! Nikon has done themselves proud with a camera that is now in a market that is full of tough competition. A while ago when the D80 first came out Nikon was way ahead of the pack because there wasn't much competition. Things have changed signifigantly and Nikon has kept pace with the demand. The camera has several preprogrammed "scene" modes like most digital cameras, such as "Portrait", "Landscape", "Micro", "Sports" and "Night" There isn't anything unusual about the modes of course, it's the quality of the image that you get from each of those modes that dazzles. The camera has a multitude of features including custom programming modes so you can adjust the camera to take a particular scene the way YOU want instead of the way the manufacturer wants.The camera is built very well, solid and it feels great in your hands. It's the kind of camera you can take with you to a football game and not worry about someone damaging it with a slight bump. It comes in body only or with several "kit" lenses. The most common being the 18-105mm Zoom lens with Vibration Reduction. The lens is of good quality although you could buy a better one by avoiding the kit lens.The camera is a bit overpriced. Not outrageously so but Nikon could have shaved a few dollars off.The bottom line is the D90 even with a slightly inflated price is an excellent camera that takes quality images even under the most demanding conditions. If you are inexperienced at photography but want a quality camera set the D90 to "auto" and point and shoot. The camera will do the work and the images will be consistantly perfect. Once you have built up some experience you can program the camera to set your mood.As for "Cons" I have just one. It has a movie mode with 24 FPS (frames per second). The movie mode is not very good if that's an important feature to you. When panning you get "shutter lag" which causes image attributes such as straight lines (the sides of a building for example) to get "skewed." If you are using it for occasional movies and avoid action scenes you won't mind but football games are out. The D90 was the first DSLR to have movie mode so I suppose one can excuse Nikon as they were the first on the block to try it. Of course you don't buy a DSLR for movies so it's kind of a "white elephant" Take it as a nice feature to play with but your camera is for taking photographs not movies.I can't recommend this camera enough. It simply takes great photgraphs. That's the job of a camera and the D90 does it very well.
Показаны отзывы 457-480 из 1022.
