Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D5200 Kit

Для начинающего фотографа отличная зеркалка, но если собираетесь еще и видео снимать, то есть проблема при настройках ручного режима, такие как диафрагма, ISO и выдержку. В остальном нареканий нет пользуюсь уже больше года доволен, но думаю купить что-нибудь посерьезней, т.к. освоил технику и понял что не хватает возможностей.

Фотографии шикарные и сам замечательный,спасибо))

Только приобрел, отличная игрушка, многому нужно научится, так как только начал, больше увлекается фотками!

Отличное качество снимков, покупкой очень довольны. Батарея держит долго, в руке лежит легко, глюков или тормозов не замечено, качество фоток супер, авто-режим хорошо справляется когда некогда настраивать ручной

Не являясь профессиональным фотографом, всё равно снимки отличные получаются и так же радует возможность менять различные режимы съёмки

приятный на ощупь, удобно держать одной рукой, много кнопок, на авто получаются хорошие снимки, дороговат

Этот фотоаппарат - моя первая зеркалка. Поэтому каких либо профессиональных комментариев дать не смогу... Качество снимков по сравнению с "мыльницей" Canon - просто шикарные! Это не "минус", но надо иметь ввиду, что оригиналы снимков занимают очень много места на компьютере. Для снимков придется выделять отдельный съёмный диск или записывать на диски для хранения. Иначе вся память будет очень быстро забита снимками.Этот аппарат надо изучать. Просто сделать снимки на автомате - легко и просто. Но там очень большие возможности, которые стразу не постигнуть.

Неделю заняла доставка до Иркутска, что вполне приемлемо с учётом невысокой цены (у нас в Иркутске такой комплект стоит на 1500 руб дороже). Плюс к этому часть покупки оплатил бонусами СПАСИБО от Сбербанка. В пункте выдаче понимающе и даже с интересом отнеслись к моей комплексной проверке фотоаппарата (проверял на битые/горячие пиксели и бэк/фронт-фокус). Гарантийный талон заполнен, как полагается, в случае каких-либо проблем должны принять в сервисных центрах Nikon. Дома уже детально изучил возможности фотоаппарата. Общее впечатление - супер. Есть, впрочем, небольшие недостатки: тушка небольшая по размерам, мизинец "болтается", когда держишь камеру (но это дело привычки, некритично). Второй момент - при съёмке видео сильно слышно поскрипывание автофокуса объектива. Читал про это на форумах и видел некоторые тесты видео на ютубе - у меня всё точно так же. Говорят, что устраняется при использовании внешнего микрофона. Мощность вспышки средняя, наверное стоит впоследствии купить дополнительную, но пока смысла в этом не вижу, ибо только-только начал заниматься фотографией.Кстати, не совсем было понятно, когда заказывал - есть ли бленда к объективу. Бленда есть. Пластиковая, но довольно неплохая.Вобщем, камерой очень доволен. Рекомендую проверять не только комплектность, но и базовые функции фотоаппарата непосредственно в пункте выдачи заказов - меньше проблем будет впоследствии.

Пересмотрел огромное количество отзывов о D3200, также нашёл массу сравнительных обзоров с ближайшими конкурентами - Nikon D5100, Canon 600D, Canon 650D. В итоге, посоветовавшись с другом-фотографом, остановился на D3200 с этим объективом. Пока жду доставку. Отпишусь о качестве фото после 16-17 февраля.

Купил на ОЗОНе месяц назад. Это моя первая зеркалка. Радости нет придела. После цыфромыльницы, аппарат супер. Советую всем. Недостатков пока не нашел. Отдельное спасибо ОЗОНу за сервис, все супер!!!

Before reading my review you should know this one crucial detail. Until I took a chance and bought this camera, I've only ever used Canons. I was actually looking to get a Canon 6D, then I checked out the specs, compared images and videos between the 6D and so many other cameras, and I went with the Nikon D5200 in the end. It really does capture an image with a slightly higher quality. It's subtle but significant. In terms of overall image quality alone, the only real advantage the Canon 6D has over the Nikon D5200 is the full-frame sensor's resolution, which does give you about 2x sensitivity to light as well. But full-frame DSLRs aren't right for everyone, and they incur extra expenses for more specific lenses as well.If you're after image-quality, video-quality, versatility, and affordability, I'd say this is the best DSLR you can get for under $1k USD. In fact, hands down, I truly believe this DSLR even has the best quality image you can get for under $2k USD.Again, I'm not a fanboy of Nikon or Canon or Sony or Pentax or anything. I've used a Toshiba VHS camcorder, a Sony point-and-shoot, a Panasonic Mini-DV camcorder, a Canon DSLR, a Kodak disposable, and anything else that worked well and made sense... I don't care what the brand is or how expensive or "pro" it is. All I care about it is: How good is the image quality, and is it designed well enough to easily master using it? The second point I can throw out the window if the image quality is that much better than it's competitors, but that isn't the case here either. It's a great camera all aroundPROS:1.5x crop sensor Vs. Canon's 1.6x (very close to a 35mm cinema camera crop-factor)6000 x 4000 resolution with 15.3 ľm˛ pixel size (Image is sharp, colors are detailed and very accurate!)921k dot LCD resolution which is more than you even need for the screen size.Shoots .NEF RAW... (Get the free plugin from Adobe if you use Photoshop or Lightroom)Battery lasts a very long time when not shooting (about 500 shots when shooting)30 second to 1/4000 of a second exposure range.Discrete built-in flash with multiple modes / Shoe for external flash24.2 bit color depth, 13.9 EV Dynamic range (tones are detailed, colors are rich and vivid!ISO can go up to 1200 in almost any scenario before getting noisyCompatible with almost all Nikon LensesHas a built-in help system, accessible on the fly, for every single feature and setting!Shoots HDR precomposed in camera or by bracketing multiple exposures to combine later.This baby can capture a crisp and beautiful image! The resolution is large enough, the dynamic range and color depth are wide enough, and the ISO efficiency is so good, I can take a low-light photo of a streetlamp at night, crop out a third of the image, blow it up to the original's size, and still have a crisp, clear, vivid, and noiseless image that I could print at 13x20 inches and hang on a wall, or sell at a gallery. The noise is so low, and the images are so sharp that you could easily blow up an un-cropped image to twice the captured size (26x40 inches) and it would still look fantastic.I was taken aback when I took this little guy out for it's first night shoot. Of course, a little know-how and some trial and error plays a role, but I was amazed by how accurately this sensor represents colors. I took a picture of some flowers in the immediate foreground against a backdrop of a park in the midground and a downtown strip in the far distance. Despite the street lighting, the moonlight, the neon signs, and all the little details in the store fronts, cars, trees, grass, benches, cobblestone walkway, and the telephone poll about a mile away... The picture I took was a spitting image of what I saw with my own eyes. Maybe even a little better. From the flowers in the foreground to the telephone poll far away, everything looked clean and clear and as it was in life. I was about 50 yards away from the storefronts with a 35mm lens, and I could still make out license plates in the photo. If I had focused to infinity, I probably could have made out the plates from even further away. Just as an example! That's not a regular habit or a hobby of mine. hahaha...CONS:Definitely not 100% intuitive menu settings... Read the manual before using to avoid possible confusion.ISO does not have it's own button/dial, however it's very easy to get used to using the "function" button for this.Menu system works well, but organization feels a bit chaotic and crammed in certain menu tabs.Nikon doesn't distinguish much between photography and videography. READ MANUAL to get familiar with all settings!Non-CPU manual lenses can only be used in Manual Mode. Would be nice to at least have auto ISO/Exposure as an option.The (BRONZE) paint job is not a matte finish like it looks in every photo you see. It's a glossy finish like the red version.PART 2 ~ THE LENSE:The Kit lens feels a little cheap compared more expensive lenses, but it actually performs very well. I used it a couple times an

Updated November 25, 2013Professional camera reviewer Ken Rockwell suggests that the 5200 body for about $800 can do mostly everything the can be done by the D600 $2,000 body so why pay the difference for some extra dials and buttons? I followed his advice and bought the D5200 and will keep it, but if a good used D600 body were offered for sale for $1,000 I'd gladly swap. While I realize the camera can do a lot, the lack of easy control buttons and extra modes bugs me. It's a downsizing I know, but to have to hold down one button while activating another ... not intuitive after shooting for years with a larger more expensive D300. Example: somewhere along the line I was trying to adjust the aperture in A mode and apparently wound up sending the exposure compensator to +4.5, thus way over exposing my shots beyond any use. This would not have happened with the additional dials and buttons on the more professional Nikon series. (My dog was happy to fetch another ball for another test.)The camera can indeed take great images. After resetting the exposure compensator to zero I shot images of my dog running back with a ball. In Aperture mode with aperture set at f4 the auto exposure system chose a 1/1,600 speed and the auto focus worked well; the resulting image was very sharp, even for the eyes of the dog and the marks on the tennis ball in his mouth.As another reviewer noted, this camera's auto focus feature works with some, but not all, Nikon auto focus lenses. For example, it works with my AF-S 70-200 and 18-200 lenses, but not with a 50mm Nikon auto focus AF lens nor with a Tamron auto focus lens that I own. That's understandable and should not be a problem for people buying new lenses. Just be aware.This might be a good starter camera for someone who thinks he or she might grow into doing more creative photography than normally done with a simple point and shoot camera.The D5200 might also be a relatively inexpensive camera body for someone wanting to do fast moving sports photography; I've not tested the fast tracking feature, but it sounds great and the large number of megapixels should allow wider angle photos. I.e., rather than zoom in on a galloping horse and perhaps later discover the nose is missing, one could take a wider photo of the horse and background to be sure all of the horse is in the photo and then in editing crop out the unwanted parts and still have a high resolution image of the entire horse. To me that's a fairly significant advantage.The D5200 seems to me a great technological achievement in a compact plastic size. On the other hand, for about $1,000 for the D5200 and a compatible lens, perhaps most consumers (particularly those who won't be wanting to use various lenses)could do as well with a lower cost, more pocket size camera, while photographers who are used to a larger size camera with controls we can use without looking may find themselves a bit frustrated.It's a matter of fit between the buyer and the camera. Good luck and have fun._______Nov 25 2013 I just returned from a month long trip on a large sailboat crossing the Atlantic Ocean. Because weight and size were concerns in traveling, after debating I took only my D5200 with only my Nikon 18-200 VR lens.This worked well! I used the weight saving to take my older larger laptop with my familiar LR and PS software; accessing the "cloud" was mostly not possible / practical and I was glad I'd made this choice.I found the video mode surprisingly useful. When I was at the helm of the huge sailboat, the person to whom I passed my D5200 camera could not quickly use it to shoot photos, so I put it in video mode and handed it back to her. The video mode worked well in full automatic, allowing anyone who can point and shoot to create good memories. The built in microphone picked up some wind noise, but that's to be expected on the deck of a moving sailboat.With days at sea, I began playing with the video and to push the limits. I tried videoing flying fish which sometimes skimmed above the waves, which proved too difficult for the camera's autofocusing(at least in my hands). However that was asking a lot - with the photographer sailing forward while also moving up and down from sideways swells, the background consisting entirely of waves in motion, and airborne fish briefly skimming in a different direction! In another unfair test, I got acceptable results: Others on the boat had created a slideshow on a laptop using contributed photos and were attempting to record music to match the images. I essentially had my D5200 look over their shoulders to video the laptop images while also capturing the music being played. I instead of a tripod I used a bunch of masking tape to tape my camera to a brass rail to keep it stable relative to the subject (both gently rolling sideways at the same rate). In this interior setting we would want the aperture to remain constant because only the music is changing. However, the ima

Using a DSL is allot different than a point-n-shoot camera. It's a different mentality and user experience.Think of the DSR as a platform, for different lenses. In order to take advantage of its full potential, you need different lenses to attach to the platform body.The point and shoot has those built in. But, once you attach the correct lens to a DSR, then its magic will come out. It is a very precise platform, when attached to the correct lens, where as a P'n'S is not.I send mine back...they are coming out with a d7100, with better specs."Nikon has revealed a new enthusiast-level flagship DX-format camera, the 24.1-megapixel Nikon D7100. The much-awaited update to the aging D7000 has a professional-level 51-point AF system, and continuous full resolution shooting at 6 fps. Notably, the camera also does away with the optical low pass filter - meaning it should be able to capture sharper detail than cameras with a similar resolution.The Nikon D7100 has been given a specially designed DX-format (APS-C) 24.1-megapixel CMOS sensor (so not the same one employed in the D5200) which doesn't use the traditional optical low pass (anti-aliasing) filter found in most cameras. Nikon says this means it can produce sharper images that make the most of its resolution ... and presumably the firm is confident users won't suffer (too much) in terms of moiré and aliasing artifacts.Autofocus is another area where Nikon has significantly improved the camera. The D7100 uses the Nikon Advanced Multi-CAM 3500DX autofocus sensor module, and employs the same algorithm used in the Nikon D4. This gives what Nikon describes as "professional-level performance" from the 51 focus points (15 cross-type sensors), including speedy subject acquisition, and phase-detection AF down to a minimum luminance of -2 EV (really dark conditions).Using an EXPEED 3 image processor, the new camera has an ISO sensitivity of 100-6400 (expandable to 25600) and can shoot full resolution images at a not-too-shabby 6 fps, though the buffer capacity is only good for six frames in full 14-bit RAW (or 33 frames in JPEG fine and large).Interestingly, Nikon has also introduced a new 1.3x crop function which crops images, giving an extra telephoto effect - and taking it to about double the 35mm-format focal length. This is likely to be welcomed by sports and wildlife shooters, who will also benefit from the way focus points cover a wider area of the cropped frame ... and the increase in continuous shooting speed, which goes up to 7 fps. Cropped images are 15.4 megapixelsOn the video side of things there's Full HD (1920 x 1080) recording at frame rates of up to 60i/50i and 30p/25p/24p. Dropping the resolution to 1280 x 720 gives users the option of 60p recording. Video recording can be based on the full DX-format or using the 1.3x crop (both in an aspect ratio of 16:9). While there's a stereo microphone, videographers will also be pleased to see an external microphone jack and headphone connector.There's a 3.2-inch LCD on the rear with 1,229k dots, while the 100 percent coverage optical viewfinder has been given an OLED display (for the information under the image) which is said to be very bright and have low power consumption.Measuring 5.3 x 4.2 x 3 inches (135.5 x 106.5 x 76 mm) and weighing 23.8 ounces (675 g) the D7100 features magnesium alloy top and rear covers in a durable body which is dust, weather and drop resistant. For those who prefer their cameras with a vertical grip, Nikon has also introduced the MB-D15, which adds the usual shutter-release button, AE/AF lock button, multi selector, and command dials. It can be powered either by six AA batteries or the standard D7100 batteryThough there's no built-in wireless capabilities, the Nikon D7100 is compatible with the optional WU-1a Mobile Adapter which allows users to transmit images wirelessly to an iOS or Android device, or to remotely control the camera.While the numbering of the Nikon D7100 shows it's an update to the D7000, it's also possibly the closest thing the D300s is going to get to a replacement. Nikon is choosing to refer to it as the "flagship of Nikon's DX-format HD-SLR lineup" and it's hard to see what the fabled D400 could add ... other than a larger full-metal body and faster continuous shooting with a bigger buffer.The Nikon D7100 will sell for US$1,200 body-only when it goes on sale in March, or $1,600 with the AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR kit lens."I mean for $300 more, why not get a better one? Coming out soon!

This camera may be the best APS-C in its class so far. After Nikon's quality control issue with the full-frame D600 (sensor oil spot problem), Nikon may be able to win back its trust with this new release, again aimed at enthusiasts and amateur photographers. Being an amateur photographer for years and have invested quite a sum in Sony, Canon and Nikon bodies and lenses, I myself settled with Nikon in personal preference. I would say all three brands got its personality (good and bad), especially with Sony pushing the translucent mirror technology.The D5200 is a step up from the D3200 as an entry to mid-level body. Very solid performance and thank god it does not suffer the fate of the D600. The D5200 produces extremely good quality images just like the D3200. Both the D3200 and D5200 share the 24MP sensor resolution, with the difference being the light sensitivity in high ISO situations. Both cameras are able to produce extremely well results in terms of photo quality. I am usually able to get better image results from the D3200 and D5200 compared with Sony's A65 and A77 in actual use. Sony somehow made the older A55 easier than the A65 and A77 at getting a clean and noise free shot (maybe due to sensor difference). So Nikon wins here, I would say the image quality of the D5200 is as good as the well acclaimed Canon 60D in most cases easily done (with the D5200 at a higher resolution). So the major difference of the D5200 compared with the D3200 is the focus sensor and exposure meter sensor. The D5200 borrows the technology from the bulkier D7000 and presents 39 AF points including 9 cross-type AF points for accuracy and a more precise exposure metering system (D3200 have 11 AF points, 1 cross-type). This is extremely useful in specific situations, such as shooting moving objects or in macro photography. The D3200 performed very well in everyday shooting, but with my 40mm and 60mm Nikon Micro lenses, the AF failed to accurately or effectively focus on very close subjects. The D5200 however is much better, the body focused efficiently on to desired subjects precisely. The focus speed is still mainly dependent on the lens.The swing-out LCD screen is useful in some situations and video shooting, but proves less useful to me. And keep in mind when using live-view, the camera no longer uses the phase-detection AF sensors, but rather switches to use contrast AF, which utilizes your APS-C image sensor and the CPU (less accurate and slower AF in most cases).The D5200 is not designed to be weatherproof, but it will survive a short time of mist and a few droplets. Anything more may just end up killing the camera. The battery life is very good for photos, will last you 1000+ shots on a single charge in most cases while not using live-view. However when you need it for a video project, consider carrying a few extra batteries with you or resort to an external power source.If you are starting out in Nikon or just DSLR in general, buy the 18-55mm Kit, and add on the 55-200mm VR lens (you get $100 discount bundled). The Nikon 55-200mm DX VR is a VERY GOOD lens, you do not want to get it later since you may be paying the full price for a new one. The VR (Nikon's optical vibration reduction) of the 55-200mm will allow you to capture subjects/people at a good wanted distance with extremely well image quality and brilliant background defocus, opens many doors for quality and creativity. The Nikon 55-200mm DX VR is one of the best lenses I have used and also at a very affordable price.The other kit lens offering of the D5200 is the 18-105mm kit. The 18-105mm is not very good and I'm not going to get too much into the details; it generally is not very good in terms of construction for a heavier lens and causes more barrel distortion.For me, how the function buttons are positioned on the D5200 is a little awkward, but for others it may just be a matter of time to get used to. Compared with the D5100, the D5200 is quite a big step-up in terms of crucial internal hardware.