Фотоаппарат Nikon D5200 Kit — 419 отзывов, плюсы и минусы

Правда у меня объектив 18-105. Выбирал долго и упорно, анализировал как интернет пространство, так и мнения тех кто уже давно в теме. Это моя первая зеркальная фотокамера, поэтому пребываю в состоянии восторга и настороженности. На данный момент агрегат намного умнее меня, поэтому и осторожничаю)) Метод "тыка" я не приемлю, поэтому изучаю его возможности поэтапно. Начинаю видеть свои банальные промахи - игра света, тени, неверные настройки, "мыло" из-за кривых рук. Появилось желание серьёзно изучить возможности и методы современной фотографии.

На тыщщу цену снизили? Смотря с каким временем, я его здесь же где-то 2 года назад за 28 брал...Хороший фотик, с нормальным объективом для начинающего - само то будет. Уже два года пользуюсь в равках снимаю, правда, объективы получше приобрел, никаких жалоб )). Хотя есть мысли уже что-нибудь покруче приобрести

Классный фотик хороший подарок для себя сделала!!! Не пожалела! Разбираюсь методом тыка)))) читать некогда ! Все получается!

Заказ № 04357892-0033 06 марта 13. Подарила себе любимой на 8 марта. Нам понравился. Четко фотографирует.

Для начинающего фотографа отличная зеркалка, но если собираетесь еще и видео снимать, то есть проблема при настройках ручного режима, такие как диафрагма, ISO и выдержку. В остальном нареканий нет пользуюсь уже больше года доволен, но думаю купить что-нибудь посерьезней, т.к. освоил технику и понял что не хватает возможностей.

Фотографии шикарные и сам замечательный,спасибо))

Только приобрел, отличная игрушка, многому нужно научится, так как только начал, больше увлекается фотками!

Отличное качество снимков, покупкой очень довольны. Батарея держит долго, в руке лежит легко, глюков или тормозов не замечено, качество фоток супер, авто-режим хорошо справляется когда некогда настраивать ручной

Не являясь профессиональным фотографом, всё равно снимки отличные получаются и так же радует возможность менять различные режимы съёмки

приятный на ощупь, удобно держать одной рукой, много кнопок, на авто получаются хорошие снимки, дороговат

Этот фотоаппарат - моя первая зеркалка. Поэтому каких либо профессиональных комментариев дать не смогу... Качество снимков по сравнению с "мыльницей" Canon - просто шикарные! Это не "минус", но надо иметь ввиду, что оригиналы снимков занимают очень много места на компьютере. Для снимков придется выделять отдельный съёмный диск или записывать на диски для хранения. Иначе вся память будет очень быстро забита снимками.Этот аппарат надо изучать. Просто сделать снимки на автомате - легко и просто. Но там очень большие возможности, которые стразу не постигнуть.

Неделю заняла доставка до Иркутска, что вполне приемлемо с учётом невысокой цены (у нас в Иркутске такой комплект стоит на 1500 руб дороже). Плюс к этому часть покупки оплатил бонусами СПАСИБО от Сбербанка. В пункте выдаче понимающе и даже с интересом отнеслись к моей комплексной проверке фотоаппарата (проверял на битые/горячие пиксели и бэк/фронт-фокус). Гарантийный талон заполнен, как полагается, в случае каких-либо проблем должны принять в сервисных центрах Nikon. Дома уже детально изучил возможности фотоаппарата. Общее впечатление - супер. Есть, впрочем, небольшие недостатки: тушка небольшая по размерам, мизинец "болтается", когда держишь камеру (но это дело привычки, некритично). Второй момент - при съёмке видео сильно слышно поскрипывание автофокуса объектива. Читал про это на форумах и видел некоторые тесты видео на ютубе - у меня всё точно так же. Говорят, что устраняется при использовании внешнего микрофона. Мощность вспышки средняя, наверное стоит впоследствии купить дополнительную, но пока смысла в этом не вижу, ибо только-только начал заниматься фотографией.Кстати, не совсем было понятно, когда заказывал - есть ли бленда к объективу. Бленда есть. Пластиковая, но довольно неплохая.Вобщем, камерой очень доволен. Рекомендую проверять не только комплектность, но и базовые функции фотоаппарата непосредственно в пункте выдачи заказов - меньше проблем будет впоследствии.

Пересмотрел огромное количество отзывов о D3200, также нашёл массу сравнительных обзоров с ближайшими конкурентами - Nikon D5100, Canon 600D, Canon 650D. В итоге, посоветовавшись с другом-фотографом, остановился на D3200 с этим объективом. Пока жду доставку. Отпишусь о качестве фото после 16-17 февраля.

Купил на ОЗОНе месяц назад. Это моя первая зеркалка. Радости нет придела. После цыфромыльницы, аппарат супер. Советую всем. Недостатков пока не нашел. Отдельное спасибо ОЗОНу за сервис, все супер!!!

I imagine most are coming to this camera as either an upgrade to a point and shoot, or as a next step from a lesser Dslr.My needs are a little different, so bear that in mind when you read this. This will be primarily a camera used for a studio setup, as I don't need weather sealing, high FPS, or super fast/accurate AF. That said, here are the things that I note. Both pro and Con.Pros:1. Excellent resolution (and I would be the 5300 is better still in this area) that tops out well above what I have needed in the past (about 16mp)2. Very nice ergonomics and handling. The feel in your hand (I have medium hands) is comfy and just large enough to feel "real".3. Af is better that I experienced with the D5100, or even the D7k (both previous studio bodies for me).4. The menu layout has minor improvements that I find are just notable enough to feel better than its predecessor.5. The colors out of camera seem closer to reality with this than either the 5100, or 7k bodies were. Not as nice as the D700's though.6. Swivel screen is perfect for me, esp. when using it to get low angle shots of kids and pets.Cons:1. The position of the AFL/AEL button (which I use for AF-on), is slightly off to the thumb. Too far out IMO.2. 1/4000th a tad slow.Above average functionality and great files are what make this a very good camera for my current use. For what the market seeks when looking at this sort of camera, it does very well. Even along side the best competitors, it easily holds its own IMO.Is it up for the task? Yes.Are the images it can produce pretty good (allowing for the skill behind the camera, and the lens in front)? - No, its not pretty good, its excellent overall.Will it make toast and tuck you in at night? Well if that was what you hoped for, you were looking in the wrong place anyhow.EDIT: Nikon updated the firmware today, and fixed the only real bug this camera suffers from. Namely the AF-on functionality during certain shooting setups.

This is my first digital SLR. I began using film SLRs back in 1965, but quit photography for a while when the last one broke down in the 1980s. I've been through a variety of small digital cameras starting in 2000, the last being a 4-megapixel Nikon Coolpix 4500 purchased in 2003 (for $529.95).I've taken at least 6,000 photos with the CP 4500 -- mostly macros of insects and spiders, since it can focus down to 0.7 inches, but also lots of bird shots. When the flash quit working on the CP 4500 early in 2013, I decided that it was time for something a bit more advanced. I did a lot of research online and settled on the D5200 with the 18-105mm zoom. We were heading out as far west as Tucson, AZ for our spring vacation, and I wanted more zoom than the usual 18-55mm kit lens for birding.The combination of D5200 and 18-105mm zoom worked out extremely well during our 3-week vacation, and I got hundreds of great shots. I've recently added the 85mm f/3.5 Micro-Nikkor for macro work and Nikon's 55-300mm zoom to get closer to the birds, and will be trying them out during a couple of weeks in Florida just after Christmas.I've been completely satisfied with the D5200 so far, and I like having an SLR with interchangeable lenses again. The flip-and-tilt LCD screen is one thing that influenced my decision. The CP 4500 had a twistable split-body that permitted taking shots of arthropods from lots of odd positions, and I wanted that flexibility, even though the D5200 will be too large to get in everywhere the CP 4500 will fit.Of course, things are a bit pricey nowadays. My first film SLR cost $59 (and didn't have auto-anything -- not even a built-in light meter), which is about 1/17th of what the D5200 cost, but then again I used to buy Levis for $2.95, and cameras have improved a whole lot more than blue jeans have.

Our six year G9 Canon camera had a failure too expensive to fix.So we decided replace it. I considered the new Nikon Coolpix 600. It has no RAW mode and no socket for an external flash, I looked at Canon SX-50. Based on my G9 Canon experience, this is quite complicated to operate. The UI of cameras seems to not make much progress compared to cell phones.Nikon D3200 as an SLR camera,. Because the new model D3300 came out, the D3200's price is suddenly closer to the long zoom point and shoot. The camera is very light and all commands are intuitive. We added a WiFi access via WU-1a Nikon accessory.The Nikon D5200. I has a rotating display, so one can take a "selfie" It has more pre-set shooting programs and a better focusing system. I could not resist the temptation so we got the Nikon 5200 instead of 3200.The clarity and color of the photos is astonishing. Compared to my Canon 7D, this camera weights almost half. We bought it in red, which looks like a modern art piece in a modern art museum..The price of Nikon D5200 compared to what it offers is a steal. Simply out of the box, If you are real beginner, the camera takes pictures in only two setting; automatic, and automatic no flashThen slowly, you can learn more features as the camera smoothly invites you to try from its sheer simplicity that seems to say "you can do it".

About a year ago I went from D70 to D7000 in one gulp. Despite all the "D7000 is a very great move" suggestions online it was a very silly idea because I could barely operate the D7000. I tried a variety of lenses, but nothing could fix my lack of know-how. Eight wonderful D70 years did NOT prepare me for the D7k. The fact that the d7k even HAS an Auto button is a JOKE. I had to shoot manually to get even half decent shots (although I have to say it was great for doing high speed shots of dogs leaping through the air)So a few months ago I craigslisted my D7000 - it pretty much covered a nice new D5200.The D5200 was a good move for me. Even video became a possibility with the d5200 (quite difficult on the D7000 due to the awful fixed screen and the 24fps)The D5200 works nicely with my 50mm prime lens and with my old kit D7000 lens. It even works well with my old D70 kit lens!!However it would seem that the skin color of pictures with the prime + D5200 seems off,bland, and often a little overexposed. But sometimes it's great. I have no idea, really.Anyway to sum up: good snapshots, easy to use all round. LIGHTER than the D7k. Good in low light. But for video? BEWARE! This isn't a camcorder! The autofocus on my lenses in AF-F trying to track kids/dog/baby is awful. It does the best it can but the technology for a rank amateur just isn't there, and won't be anytime soon.If I could just stop the pictures from being a little too bright it would be a perfect camera for me!

I'm not going to get into the stats of this camera. There are many other reviews and websites that already have this information available.The Nikon D5200 is a nice camera. It has a swivel screen which is useful for video or weird camera angles. It has a lot of nice features, one of my favorites being all the auto-focus points and the low noise at high ISOs. The stock lens is perfect for a beginner. You can learn on the kit lens and still have quality pictures. You will want to upgrade eventually though.I think this camera is great for people who want to actually learn photography. If you're just going to shoot in Auto mode all the time, get a nice point and shoot and save yourself a lot of money. If you're actually interested in learning how to manually control your camera, then get a DSLR. The D3000 series (D3300 is most recent at the time I wrote this) is another great series by Nikon with a few less features. Also a great starter DSLR.

I bought this camera primarily for the increase in pixel count over my D7000, but it turns out to be much simpler to operate and much lighter in weight. While the D7000 can accommodate most vintage Nikon Nikkor lenses, the D5200 pretty much has to use the new S VR lenses because it does not have the lens motor drive built-in. The increase in pixel count from 16 to 24 allows a little more cropping of distant shots over the D7000 (the newer D7100 now has 24 megapixels). I also like the swivel view screen over the fixed view screen on the D7000, this makes it easier to view your subject when the camera is held well above or well below your head. The D5200 is a good buy for the money, I got mine "used" on Amazon.

I am a senior citizen and a novice to photography so I enrolled in a Digital Camera class at my local Adult Ed program to learn the basics. Soon I wanted to upgrade from my (excellent but ageing) little Kodak point-and- shoot digital camera. I began my research by visiting the larger electronic retailers to see the varieties and options available and deciding what kind of photos I might like to capture. I like stills of family vacations, landscapes, group shots and stop action photos of grandkids but I NEED easy to operate. I also want low light capability for "No flash" venues like museums. Over a six month span I gravitated to Nikon D series. I asked myself, "What are the minimal camera features I would need to satisfy my intentions?" and "If price is no object which version should I choose?" I discovered the flexible view screen of D5100 would allow me to shoot from a low angle without hurting my arthritic back and knees. The discounted D3200 kit with two lenses was a tempting option for me but the testimonies of other reviewers stated that they liked their Nikon cameras so much that they later bought the next generation as well--not a prudent and economical strategy for me. Also, the lenses offered in the kits were entry level so I would surely later wish I had upgraded to the better Vibration Resistant lenses available. My choice has been to purchase a D5200 black body separately instead of a kit with lenses. Then I selected two lenses more to my liking--Nikon 18-170mm VR to use as my "Do-it-all" lens and a Wide Angle lens for scenery and group photos. No doubt I'll grow to want a portrait lens as well someday. Meanwhile, I have the ideal entry level set up for my needs.

too many problems, so after 2 hours of TestingDID NOT BUY this nonsense...a... Pix are NOT sharp. BAD LENS.you have to buy Better MOTORIZED LENS,so you need to budget few hundred dollars more...first they are dishonest to you, then you pay more for their greed.( i talk of garbage lens AND non motorized body too,(oops sorry, amazon, is Garbage allowed inyour world ? )b.... iso, speed, aperature, etc...TOO DIFFICULT To changeas if some UNFORTHCOMING engineer with Severe Logic problems designed this.compare to any other REAL camera by ricoh, fuji etc etc.in which the above things are EASY to change, and you dont need an INSTRUCtion manualto do so....c.... this is class C type nikon, NO focus motors in the body...so you are blackmailed yet again, you need to find motorized lenses...class B cameras also have same prob...only top end, over usd 2000 camerashave a cheap 20 dollar motor in them, in the camera body.extreme greed by nikon nowadays...d....if you plan to use manual lenses and focus thru tiny viewfinder,you will find it too dark to see that tiny green circle in left bottom cornereven with an f 2 lens.over the years, nikon doesnt give a HOOT for us,so better to drop them altogether now.TOo heavy in weight and yet a bit big for smaller asian hands...remember this is half chip size, NOT full format size...even.nikon wonders why slr cameras aint selling so hot. duhhhfor this price,one has SO MANY OTHER Smaller options and sharper fotos, andEASIER To use logical menus.Try cameras from ricoh , fuji, pentax and even canon...best of luckthanks

This is a great camera; takes beautiful and clear pictures. There are many settings and filters to learn. I am new at using this kind of camera, but it is easy to learn without reading the entire book. If you are looking for a great camera with many settings, filters and takes clear photos then look no further. The only thing I wish I would have purchased at the same time was the 55-200mm lens because the 18-55mm lens (that comes with it) doesn't have any telephoto or real close up view. I have ordered the additional lens.

The subject says it all. I've been going back and forth about this camera for over a year now. I am very pleased I finally got it. It takes fantastic pictures, AND it works with all my old lenses. The catch with the old lenses is that they don't auto focus during the videos. I'll apparently need to get a new digital SLR lens that will auto focus properly for me. I want it mostly for vacation pictures and videos so I don't really need to have the absolute control over the focus when I'm taking a video

I have only owned this camera for about a month now. It does everything as advertised.The only things I would mention to people upgrading to a dslr would be that the D5200 autofocusis built into the lens. Where as if you spend a couple hundred dollars more the autofocus systemis built into the camera. With the latter type camera you can use older lenses.The other thing worth mentioning is other than the shutter setting you need to push and hold down a button andthen rotate the setting wheel to change your ISO and aperture settings. This can become challenging whenlooking through the view finder.For the price, if you are on a budget you can't go wrong with this camera. The bottom line is the actual picture andthe D5200 takes an awesome picture!

I've always been a Canon guy, but recently decided to try out Nikon. The D5200 has become a great,reliable backup camera for me. It's lightweight, takes high quality images and full HD video up to 60i which is great for moving images. There isn't much noise even at high ISOs. My only gripe is that it is harder to adjust settings using the buttons and scroll wheels, so you are forced to enter menus to make fine changes that could be more easily be done on my Canons.However, even for a main camera, not just a backup, I can still recommend the D5200.

I own a D5100 and 50 mm 1.8 G, absolutely love every picture 5100 takes,the pictures are sharp in focus points.Recently i upgraded to 5200 thinking it will improve low light image capturing and better pictures and more focus points. But I was wrong, 5200 cannot produce sharp image with any lens i own (Kit lens, 50mm and 55-300). The picture is not sharp even at focus points regardless of settings. The images seems like taken from compact cam.Its my fault that I didn't test this camera within 30 days. I think mine is faulty but not sure.With Nikon warranty you have to have pay shipping cost for repair, so I would recommend everyone to test you cam within 30 days or you have go through all frustration and "copy paste" response from Nikon customer care (seriously irritating).1 start for Nikon and when the camera is repaired , i'll test and provide stars.

I am upgrading from the Nikon D40 and I found that the D5300 was very easy to use and it has the no flash feature which works great in lower light scenarios. The stock lens is just right in size and ability to take your everyday shots. I find that the feel of the camera is just right and I don't notice it being to bulky or too small for an SLR (The D40 seemed to be a bit small for my larger hands).The speed and quality of the shots form this camera are outstanding and I am very happy with my purchase!

It is a great camera, lightweight with controls very convenient placed on the camera body. There were two instructions that should be highlighted. I did not read that you had to press the screen button twice to go to the menu selection and spent a while to figure it out. My fault. Also I had set the AP-C instead of the AP-S and the camera would not shoot the picture. After I read the manual I understood the specific condition that AP-C to be used for focusing on moving targets. Again my fault.I really like it where you could cover and protect the screen side. This is because I accidentally damaged and cracked my D90 screen. It is really a fantastic camera with lots and lots of features that I would probably use about 30% of the sophisticated features. I hope to really test it out when I go on a 10 day business trip to China.

This is an awesome camera. It was between this or the canon rebel T5i. It's not cumbersome to operate. In fact my wife is terrible with tech items and she finds it simple to use and loves it. If you have kids in sports/activities the rapid fire option is great. Beware you will take a lot of pics so make sure you have a large SD card and hard drive. We also bought the extra lens for long shots and it was a little expense but worth it.

If you are looking for a middle of the road camera when it comes to budget, This is hands down one of the best options out thereRidiculous quality on photos and videos, I did some research on every different type of camera and the dslr type cant be matched when it comes to delivering quality in this price range(this is my opinion)Only negative with this camera would be the power drainage it suffers when shooting high quality video, as well as the mic, the mic in the camera is cell phone like, this didn't disappoint me because the quality of everything else greatSo I recommend getting an extra battery and an external mic if you want to shoot videosAlso the Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 lens should be one of the first lenses you get, incredible lens, the nikons 35mm and 50mm dont seem to match its sharpness

I already owned Nikon gear but decided to get a smaller, lighter, higher pixel count camera for vacations and now for shooting video. It will work along side my Sony video camera with a similar sensor size. Once you see the big sensor on video there is no going back to the smaller camcorders (1/6 or 1/3" sensors I mean). The camera works great. Good images. But the batteries or not very long lived. Get extra batts if you buy this for heavy video use. The camera shuts down after 30 minutes of video recording and that is really as long as the battery charge is good for. Maybe an other 5 or so minutes. So it works out well 1 Battery per 30 minutes of recording. The battery seams to be fine for still pictures though. I never went through a complete charge in a day for that.

Like others, we finally made the leap to a SLR. This is an intermediate choice, with a sophisticated and robust processor. There is a great review by "Faymous Media" that provides a nice video of the capabilities and specs. It helped tipped scales in favor of this model over the 3000 series, and over comparable Canon models. We are very happy with the photo quality, excellent frames per second, and depth of options.After a month of playing, we are beginning to get an understanding of how to use the vast range of the D5200 capabilities. We are now shopping for other lens varieties for other types of photos, both long distance and ultra-wide. We highly recommend the WU-1a adapter if you have an iPad or iPhone. With that you don't need to bother with buying the remote shutter. It also allows quick views and wireless copying of photos already on the SD card.

I have not used an SLR (Pentax K1000) since i started having problems finding film and developers. I began using my phone to take pictures but they were not exactly what i wanted each time, i kept missing the ability to backlight and change the aperture to increase the focus range. The D5200 has been great, i have been taking much sharper pictures and i continue to play with the manual mode to perfect my shot. What is best now is that i can bracket my pictures without wasting 3 or 4 frames of film. As a new comer to DSLRs i cannot give a great comparison to other cameras on the market, but i can say that this camera did not have a steep learning curve due to the scenes mode and i was impressing people with my first shots. I love the manual, aperture and shutter speed priority and the ability to set the ISO (equivalent) has been great. My only con is that the lenses are much more expensive than i remember from the 90's.