Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Nikon D3300
257 отзывов пользователей o Nikon D3300
Пользовались
Nikon D3300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
15.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This item is very easy to use, I use it often and it is of high quality. I'm very happy with the purchase.
Скроменый эксперт
28.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
it is working great... The lens that comes with it might not be enough for a learning student. So buy some good lenses. It's a great product for a learning student. I think a professional photographer might not be very pleased with it though.
Скроменый эксперт
26.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The only way this camera could have been better for what I need is to have a zoom lens. I don't need a macro lens with this camera because the sensor will pick up and magnify things that are much smaller than the human eye can see. I can't wait until springtime to get some close-ups of insects and tiny flowers with this thing.
Скроменый эксперт
09.04.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
User friendly and the grey color looks really chic!!!The camera is Just nice size for having in my bag:)
Скроменый эксперт
26.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The best camera ever!! Love it!! Perfect picture, and you can take beautifull landscape, It's a wonderfull use for every photo you want to take
Скроменый эксперт
22.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
There is nothing to dislike I just need to spend the time to understand all the bells and whistles and there are quite a few of those.
ASLAN
30.01.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Все четко, объектив 18-105 как и писали
Никита К.
13.09.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Качество съёмки, время работы без подзарядки
Дмитрий Петров
28.08.2022
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + Дешёвый. Ещё и с китовым объективом. Всё, что надо есть. С функциями зеркалки справляется в полном объёме.
- - Тормоза с фокусом на низких ИСО - это, кстати, был первый симптом начала смерти первой тушки. Малоремонтопригоден. Проще новый купить.
Раньше...
Михаил М.
10.03.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Всё приехало как заявлено в описании товара, фотоаппарат цел и исправен
- - Не обнаружено ничего критического
Nt Walker
01.11.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Можно смело брать б/у тысяч за 10.
Брать нужно body (без объектива) и докупать хорошие фиксы (35mm или 50mm). Благодаря их диафрагме 1.8 будут получаться те самые красивые фото с размытием, глубиной и резкостью. Дешевые зумы же, к коим относится и китовый объектив, во-первых, темные, во-вторых, менее резкие и имеют сильные оптичесике искажения. - - Иногда промахивается автофокус. Лучше всегда делать по 5 кадров с перефокусировкой для верности.
Я все время сбиваю точку фокусировки случайными нажатиями на навипад.
Шокирующе медленный режим лайв вью.
Нет датчика...
Скроменый эксперт
26.12.2022
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + Хорошо фотографирует
- - Отвалилось стекло, изначально было не до конца вставшим внутрь стекло немного больше. Совет- сразу проверяйте не только функциональность но и внешний вид.
Про...
Надежда
22.03.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Отличный фотоаппарат для новичков.
Павел Д.
09.12.2023
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + хорошая кропкамера, со всеми необходимыми функциями. отличное качество фотографий, простой и удобный интерфейс.
- - довольно медленно работает в лайв режиме, но это типично для никона
Наталья Мартыненкова
09.12.2023
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Посредсвенная модель
- + не знаем
- - вещь точно б/у. на карте памяти куча фотографий других людей. противно до жути!!! обман чистейший воды. ооооочень противно! отзыв точно отфильтруют! фуууууу, мерзко!
Андрей Аверин
01.01.2022
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Плохая модель
- + Цена
- - Нет диска , коробка вся затертая. Доставку задержали на три часа от назначенного времени.гарантия...
Анастасия Н.
09.01.2022
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Хорошая комплектация товара, быстрая доставка. Прекрасный фотоаппарат для новичков. Снимки получаются волшебные. Как только он оказался у меня в руках, мне хочется снимать...
Александр А.
22.05.2022
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + Цена,лёгкость эксплуатации
- - слабая батарейка 🔋 ,ну и наверное слабенький стандартный объектив ,но для...
Елена Белопухова
06.07.2022
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Товар пришел быстро. Упакован достойно. В комплекте фотоаппарат, батарея, руководство пользователя,...
Пинаев Артём
11.12.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Удобный, качественный
dzz446
13.12.2024
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- - Пока не разобрался, нет диска
Фрумсон Владимир
17.01.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + хорошее качество снимков.
- - не выявленно
Скроменый эксперт
29.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Previously I owned Sony DSC F717 which was best in class back then and it still performs well, within its limits. So I would be making few comparisons along the way when necessary.Let me cover the points which matters to me the most in this cameraFocus - I use spot focusing 99% of the time and its very accurate and rarely misses a shot. It can even lock on a subject with ease in challenging backgrounds.View finder - While the focus is great, the view finder isn't the best i've seen. For most part of my shooting, I find it sufficient but on some situations its not so great.For example, when I trying to shoot a grey & black striped dragon fly sitting on a fungus infested wall, I could see where it was with my naked eye but through the view finder it was very hard to locate it. But then I was just barely able to see it with naked eye.Also when shooting very bright subject, when shutter is half pressed the Red focus spot lighting up is barely visible but I work around this by checking the green spot which confirms focus which is clearly visible in the view finder.OVF vs EVF - My previous camera had EVF which is very handy in direct sun light to check for focus on the images I just shot. So I will miss it in bright sunny conditions but I think I can manage by increasing lcd screen brightness in Nikon.Focus points - I just use the center spot metering most of the time, so I dont really care much about 11 points vs 36 points etc.Kit Lens - The kit lens is pretty good. It can do superb macro @55mm and is sharp at that focal length. The VRll is really effective in low light conditions where the shutter speed drops below 1/30.I bought 35/1.8, assuming it will perform significantly better than the kit lens and the difference wasn't that big as the kit lens held its own which I never expected to happen.I tested by setting the 18-55 lens to 35mm and shot few pics of some flowers, distant objects etc. I did the same with the 35 mm/1.8 @ same aperture values and then compared them. The first thing to notice is the 18-55 gives you more in-focus shots which I believe is due to the VRll. The 35/1.8 looked ok on normal viewing but when looked at 100%, its just not so great and 18-55 won more times.Even in low light situations, where the 1.8 aperture was supposed to perform better than the kit lens, it could not match what the VRll function could do at much slower shutter speeds.There were photos where 35/1.8 had lesser noise in the out of focus areas but the kit lens had more in focus shots which I think matters the most.Not to mention the chromatic aberration when wide open in high contrast scenes which is not so with the kit lens, probably due to the smaller aperture than the 35mm lens.However when I can get higher shutter speeds (good light), the 35/1.8 gets better and with small apertures (over 5) it gets sharper than kit lens and picks up more finer details than the kit lens.For portraits, I found 35mm @2.8 was sharp enough with pleasing results.In low light, using a tripod gave impressive results with 35/1.8, which proved the kit lens's VR function gives it the edge in low light for hand held shots.Also the kit lens allowed for a much closer distance with the subject than the 35/1.8The 35/1.8 was much better than kit lens for indoor video, where it has no noticeable noise indoors while you can see some noise with the 18-55 lens. The clarity also seemed better in video with the 35/1.8.But then I may have very few situations where I go to the extent of switching the lens for a short video clip.Just buy with the 18-55 kit lens which makes it super light and comfortable to use. If you want to upgrade, go for 18-140mm which will give better range with very similar image quality and doesn't cost much. Get the 35/1.8 for price/performance and it can get some great shots in good light and some good ones in low light.White Balance - This camera has the standard options for its class and the auto white balance is good enough to cover most situations. However when I did want to preset manually, I noticed it took about 10 seconds or so to get it done via the menus. The same could be done in 3to 4 seconds on my 8 year old Sony camera (DSC F717) as it has a direct button to set white balance manually. I just have to find anything that's white and big enough to cover most of the frame and press that button and its set for that light. But with Nikon the same process takes much longer which discourages me to use that option often. However the auto white balance on Nikon is far superior to the old Sony I have.Strangely the auto mode on Nikon seems to be more accurate than the manual setting in it.ISO performance - For viewing pictures at normal size, even ISO 6400 is easily usable. But if you are going to crop at 100%, then better to stay around 800 and less. Overall I'm impressed with the ISO performance. Combined with the VRll of the kit lens, it covers you for most situations except long range.Shutter Lag - For moving subjects it was
Скроменый эксперт
27.04.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
This is my second-ever DSLR purchase, a first for the Nikon brand. I'm pretty much Nikon's target customer -- entry level with just enough interest in photography to spring for a DSLR. What sold me on this camera, beyond any reviews I read attesting to its merits, was a store display. The newly designed compact Nikkor VR II lenses make the overall camera + basic 18-55mm kit lens lighter and less bulky than the smallest counterpart from Canon. Compact and easier to carry means I am inclined to use my Nikon D3300 more often, whereas my former DSLR felt like lugging around a rock.In a nutshell, this camera captures pleasantly sharp images outdoors but relatively soft high ISO images indoors under average light. Menus are easy to figure out with or without reading the manual, although I did find it odd in that it is necessary to hold down the "i" button to navigate on-screen menus. It would be nice if the scroll wheel could assist in menu access (it doesn't).My first use of the camera produced outstanding battery performance, some 650 pictures (using the viewfinder, not the "live view"). Subsequent charges, however, haven't held up. In spending more time familiarizing myself with the menus and functions, the battery drain occurs that much faster -- only about 200 shots were captured before I had to charge the battery a second time. There is no GPS or WIFI functionality included with this camera, which suits me because those features can also drain the battery faster.There are a slew of in-camera image retouching options, ranging from red-eye reduction to alterations in perspective. Personally, I don't care for making image quality adjustments on a small LCD screen -- I prefer Photoshop for that -- but the Retouch options could be handy in a pinch.As a first-time Nikon DSLR owner, my experience customizing menu options runs counterintuitive to what I might otherwise expect. Too many parameters are grayed out in the menu except in the PSAM modes. And yet even in a mode that allows the user to set his/her preference, it's not always clear whether or not the defaults are overridden. Take ISO. If I set the ISO to 400, picture info nonetheless indicates ISO 3200 (in red lettering). On other cameras, picture review info indicates what is actually captured (rightly or wrongly), not what the camera thought should have been captured. Here's another example: First time out with the camera at an event, unfamiliar with how the AF would perform and unwilling to take chances, I moved through several modes to select Single Point as the AF prior to my arrival. Upon scrolling the dial to a position I previously set, I found the AF selection reset to factory defaults.Color capture defaults to a setting that is too contrasty for my liking, particularly outdoors under full sun. The good news? Dynamic range is impressive. I found very little evidence of highlight clipping, even under harsh sunlight. The bad news? When the initial batch of pictures I shot were viewed at home, "off camera" as it were, skin tones took on a yellow/red (orange) cast under full sun and a cyan/magenta (purple) cast under shadow (images shot with Auto WB, viewed on color calibrated display). On another day, portrait photos taken outdoors under similar conditions produced decidedly different results -- images under full sun took on a notably cooler, with a bluish haze (after that I purchased UV filters for the kit lenses in hopes of obtaining more accurate color). Whatever the cause may be, one downside is that in the scene/auto modes you can't change the default color capture settings. The upshot? I found it necessary to gamma correct images in Photoshop more so than I typically find necessary with JPEG output from other cameras. In contrast -- no pun intended -- Program, Shutter, Aperture and Manual modes allow for the menu selection of Standard, Neutral, Vivid and Monochrome, among other JPEG color choices. I wish Nikon would allow for more menu access throughout the range but in general most manufacturers have an annoying habit of limiting what settings will give you access to additional options and what modes will not. (My biggest gripe is that some modes appear to omit a force-on option for flash, restricting quick access to fill flash.)I haven't tested out the video function yet and I don't own other Nikkor lenses for comparison's sake, so I'll speak to the kit lens performance next. Nikkor kit lenses for the D3300 include an 18-55MM and a 55-200MM telephoto featuring the latest collapsable, space-saving design. Right off the bat I had to change out the zoom lens because it had multiple specs of dust inside the lens, some of them not particularly small or insignificant. (I thought they assembled these things in clean rooms, but I could be wrong.) Dust, however, was not the worst of it.A major fault with the 18-55mm kit lens pertains to geometric performance. Images are sharp but architectural elements are skewed to the point of bordering on comical. E
Показаны отзывы 217-240 из 257.
