Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon Coolpix P330
116 отзывов пользователей o Nikon Coolpix P330
Пользовались
Nikon Coolpix P330?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Бровкин Александр
01.10.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Множество ручных настроек, RAW, отличный конструктив, по этим параметрам "минизеркалка". Обладатели зеркальных камер Nikon в интерфейсе P330 будут "как у себя дома."
- - Камерный jpeg для меня не пригоден, как впрочем и с зеркалки D5100. Качественный результат только из raw.
Прошивка не обновляется.
Камеру купил исключительно из-за великолепной картинки в видеорежиме. Гораздо более дорогие камкордеры не выдают ничего подобного. Великолепная детализация. Но только...
Насташенко Сергей
29.12.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Качественный корпус, удобное расположение управления, быстрое включение, цветопередача на высоте, четкое изображение .
- - цена адекватна аппарату , проверяйте матрицу на битые пиксели.
Фотоаппарат очень хороший, надежный, удобный в эксплуатации,...
Скроменый эксперт
07.01.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + качественный корпус, все необходимые кнопки, хорошие фото и видео, светосильный объектив
- - медленный автофокус при плохом освещении, неадекватный указатель уровня заряда
Вполне приемлем за свою цену: лучше обычных мыльниц, но хуже беззеркалок и зеркалок. Нормальное соотношение между качеством съемки, габаритами и стоимостью.
Кузьменко Иван
10.01.2014
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Очень хорошие заявленные характеристики,красивый
- - Вообще фотик сплошное РАЗОЧАРОВАНИЕ ! Работает медленно ,особенно со вспышкой.На начальной точке зуммирования видны искажения...
Бычков Вячеслав
05.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Компактный. Хорошая сборка, не плохо смотрится. Отличные снимки для такого класса фотоаппаратов, особенно если...
Скроменый эксперт
05.05.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Хорошо фокусируется, вспышка самопроизвольно не выпрыгивает, удобный хват (резиновые вставки), яркий экран, легко-выполняющаяся панорамная съёмка
- - Не быстрое включение, включается нажатием с усилием. Не быстрое переключение между режимами (задаёт доп.вопросы). Нумерация файлов последовательная (без вариантов), при просмотре кадров увеличение срабатывает с невероятной задержкой, зум видео сверхшумный (как впрочем и положено при оптическом увеличении).
Все достоинства и недостатки приведены на основе сравнения с Canon S100, который я заменила Nikon-ом. Это мой первый Nikon. Купила белый P330, по фактуре напоминает пластиковые окна, но не жалею.
Первые пробные снимки:
http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/debethune/view/654850/
http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/debethune/view/655832/
http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/debethune/view/654851/
Первые пробные снимки:
http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/debethune/view/654850/
http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/debethune/view/655832/
http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/debethune/view/654851/
Скроменый эксперт
09.05.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Хорошо фокусируется, вспышка самопроизвольно не выпрыгивает, удобный хват (резиновые вставки), яркий экран, легко-выполняющаяся панорамная съёмка.
- - Не быстрое включение, включается нажатием с усилием. Не быстрое переключение между режимами (задаёт доп.вопросы). Нумерация файлов последовательная (без вариантов), при просмотре кадров увеличение срабатывает с невероятной задержкой (т.к. увеличивает сразу x3), зум видео сверхшумный (как впрочем и положено при оптическом увеличении).
Все достоинства и недостатки приведены на основе сравнения с Canon S100, который я заменила Nikon-ом. Это мой первый Nikon. Купила белый P330, по фактуре напоминает метало-пластиковые окна, но не жалею.
Первые пробные снимки:
http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/debethune/tags/nikon%20p330
Первые пробные снимки:
http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/debethune/tags/nikon%20p330
de Bethune
19.09.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Хорошо фокусируется, вспышка самопроизвольно не выпрыгивает, удобный хват (резиновые вставки), яркий экран, легко-выполняющаяся панорамная съёмка, прекрасно справляется со съёмкой в помещении и на улице ночью.
- - Не быстрое включение, включается нажатием с усилием. Не очень удобное переключение между режимами (задаёт...
Скроменый эксперт
21.09.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Стильный. Приятно держать в руке и фотографировать. Хорошие четкие фото. Хорошее видео HD качества.
- - Наворотов много, но для любителя они ни к чему. Никак не могу просмотреть видео и фото на современном TV. Комп. тоже не видит камеру. Не пойму в чем дело. Для чего в комплекте шнур к старым TV тоже...
Шурик Саня
20.08.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Компактный, удобный, хорошо снимает видео, заряжается от компа, RAW и JPG формат, есть много полезных функций (например: проинтервьюированная съемка, замедленная съемка, выдержка)
- - До него был Coolpix p5000. На мой взгляд качество фото было намного лучше, было меньше шумов и четче изображение даже когда фоткал...
Васильева Светлана
18.10.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Красивая модель
- - Не понимаю, возможно у меня недостаточно навыков фотографирования, но кроме того, что на фотографии получаются достаточно бледные цвета, еще и изображение "искривлено"...
Григоров Анатолий
29.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Компактность
Легкость
Быстрое включение (0.5 сек примерно)
Быстрая фокусировка
Очень быстро делает снимки
Много настроек в ручных режимах
Хорошая светочувствительность (пока тестировал только со штатива)
Есть HDR с настройкой количества снимков за раз - - Функция колёсика которое правей кнопки затвора(если смотреть на экран) - при режимах кроме ручных - отсутствует, т.е. поворачиваете, а ничего не происходит...тупо как то
Инструкция путанная, проще тыком разбираться
В недостаточной освещенности...
Скроменый эксперт
12.05.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Быстрая фокусировка.
Хорошие фото при плохом освещении.
Можно использовать карту памяти с Wi-Fi, если не хотите заморачиваться с проводами при передаче снимков на компьютер.
GPS работает на ура, но не всегда быстро ловит спутник! - - Немного неудобен в управлении, особенно в ручном режиме!
Не отображает отдельно флешкарту на компьтере, а хотелось бы этого!
Да, батареи хватает не на долго, придется покупать дополнительную!
Аппаратом доволен.
Основные отличий от фотоаппарата с меньшей матрицей, это четкость и чистота фото, т.е. меньше размыленноси!
Пробую режимы съемки!
Основные отличий от фотоаппарата с меньшей матрицей, это четкость и чистота фото, т.е. меньше размыленноси!
Пробую режимы съемки!
Beletskiy Michael
01.10.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + хороший стабилизатор изображения, в тёмное время суток снимки немного лучше аналогичных мыльниц
- - видео в режиме автофокуса иногда сходит сума, например когда я снимал...
Шушарин Александр
04.10.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Хороший фотоаппарат, брался для путешествий, с зеркалкой не хотелось таскаться, а этот:
легкий и компактный, корпус крепкий
получаются...
Скроменый эксперт
16.09.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Стильный. Приятно держать в руке и фотографировать. На это и повелась.
- - Привыкла к хорошим фото в авторежиме. Здесь неважные фото. Цвет полохо передает. Видео тоже так себе. Ни окаком FULL HD нет и речи. Наворотов много, но для любителя они ни к чему.
Дорого и не очень качественно. Думаю сдать его.
Наливкин Вадим
18.07.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + компактный,большая матрица,RAW,ручные режимы как прямо у зеркалки.
- - слабенький аккумулятор и пока всё.
Перепробовал...
Скроменый эксперт
19.09.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have had this cam about 10 days, my gf bought it for me as a birthday gift. I wanted it for the larger than average sensor, 1.8 lens, pocketable size, RAW capability, macro capability, and decent price. Overall, I like the style and size of the camera (I have it in white), and it has an impressive array of settings and controls including GPS, wifi capability, and 1080P video. I will not address those bells and whistles in this review, only image quality.The P330 is capable of very good image quality, but to get the best out of it, it takes some tweaking. Shooting in jpeg, I compared the different quality settings. Even at 200% magnification, there really was not much visible difference between 12 MP and 8 MP settings. However, there was a more visible difference between Normal and Fine quality settings. I would say for casual photos that will be emailed or file shared with friends & family, or used for web publishing, stay with the 8MP Fine setting (file sizes average 3 MP). You will not be able to tell the difference from 12MP Fine, even at 100% image size. But if there is a chance the photo will ever be blown up and printed larger than 8 x 10", definitely shoot full resolution.Shooting JPEG, even in good daylight at lowest ISO (80), you can still see JPEG artifacts at high magnification on the computer monitor. It is not terrible, but it does not look as good as a DSLR photo, but no one expects it to be as good, since the P330 has a much smaller sensor. I also recommend keeping the noise setting on LOW, to help preserve detail, especially in dimmer light. I have assigned the front Fn button to access ISO because it saves two extra button presses when accessing via the menu.I usually have ISO set to auto range between 80-400. While some noise is evident at ISO 400, it's not bad and can easily be dealt with in post processing. The colors of the JPEG images look pleasing overall, but there is some evidence of hue shifts. If true color is essential, shoot in RAW-that seems to be very accurate colorwise.I have set my User setting to be optimum for handheld low light conditions. My settings are: Aperture Mode @ 1.8 (incidentally, to keep the lens at 1.8 means no possibility of telephoto, since the 1.8 setting is only available at the widest 24mm focal length; you'll have to move in and out with your feet, not the zoom lever); ISO- auto range 80-400; Picture Control- Standard; Exposure Compensation- minus.3; noise-low; Active D-Lighting- OFF; Vibration Reduction- ON; Continuous Mode- BSS (Best Shot Selector). This last one has proved useful handheld in low light: keep the shutter pressed down and it will take a photo about every two seconds until you release and then automatically choose the sharpest version to save.But to get the highest photo quality from the P330, you should shoot in RAW. For RAW, I use Picture Control set to Natural and the sharpness turned down to 0 (better to adjust these things in post). The RAW images will have more accurate color, fewer digital artifacts and will accept sharpening and noise reduction better for an overall creamier, smoother yet sharper result. The NRW RAW files generated by the P330 are BIG- about 26MP each. For comparison, my Pentax DSLR DNG RAW files average only about 11 MP--that with a 16MP sensor! The other issue with RAW files from the P330 is that there is an enormous amount of lens distortion at the wide end of the tele range. What are supposed to be straight lines curve like rainbows. With JPEGs, the camera removes the distortion; with RAW, you must use software to remove it. I use both Adobe Lightroom 4 and Photoshop CS6. Lightroom 4.4 (which uses Adobe Camera RAW 7.4) does not have a lens profile for the P330, so you must use the manual controls to compensate for it. The current Camera RAW used in CS6 (8.2) does have the P330 lens profile, so it is one click and done.To sum up, to get photos that look close to a large sensor DSLR with the P330, you will need to shoot RAW and use post-process software that can correct the lens distortion. Unfortunately, the corners of the P330 photos will never be as sharp as what a good DSLR lens will give you. The P330 also has other operational issues such as slow image process times and slow focus, which other reviewers have commented on. Nevertheless, this cam offers a lot of flexibility and quality for the methodical shooter willing to dive deep into the menus to get the best from it. I will also add that the camera is extremely good for close ups and macro style shooting with very deep depth of field and extraordinary sharpness. When I am photographing things like jewelry, the P330 is preferable over my DSLR.
Скроменый эксперт
05.06.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The last Nikon P-series compact I owned was the P5100 - Which delivered excellent image quality, was built extremely well, but suffered at high ISOs and had a frustrating interface.I replaced it with the S90, which I loved, and then a Fuji XF1, which is great but flawed - much in the same way as this P330 is. In reading over my XF1 review, this isn't too far removed - Many of my complaints are the same.The P330 is my first foray back into the Nikon compact world, as it seemed to be close to what I loved in the S90, and close what I have been looking for - A reasonably high quality sensor, great wide angle, some advanced controls, good in low light for the class, and most importantly, pocketable.The sensor and the lens deliver extremely well for the class. I have no complaints there, you can get WONDERFUL output from this, exceeding the S90 and the XF1 - and even reasonable in low light.The build quality is also excellent - This seems as if it will be a very durable camera. I have to say that adding the textured surface to the lens "barrel" was a nasty practical joke by Nikon - It exists only to trick you that it may do something. However, this is a solidly built camera.My complaints are mostly the same ones I had with the P5100, in that the interface is sluggish and quirky. It's "typically Nikon" in that it matches much of the Coolpix series, but still isn't as geared towards advanced users as it should be for where it is positioned. It will remember where you were last, but it's not exactly quick to navigate. The dials are arguably most effective within the menu system, as they allow for changing options without going into the submenu, but the responsiveness leaves much to be desired.Which brings me to the next point - The "command dials" are completely useless most of the time, and cannot be reprogrammed. This is a massive oversight, in my opinion. The entire reason I (and many others) loved the S90 was because in addition to providing good quality output for a compact at the time, it had EXTREMELY rapid handling - assigning white balance to one control and exposure compensation to another allowed for a level of handling never before seen in a pocketable camera.The functions on both are fixed - The command dial adjusts the program shift in P mode, and the shutter speed in M and S mode, and that's it. The rear dial adjusts aperture in A mode, and is largely useless outside of that. Again, they are more useful within menus.Why on earth would you provide "advanced" handling features and restrict them so greatly? Even an "easy ISO" mode or SOMETHING would have been better than the "nothing" they do most of the time. Don't kid yourself -- how often do you shoot in Aperture Priority mode on a camera like this? Given that your DOF is EXTREMELY limited by the small sensor and the aperture/focal length combinations available, "not much" is my guess. So the rear dial is mostly there to spin uselessly.The FN button is theoretically interesting, but is thwarted by slowness. It was not immediately apparent how to remap it, which is done through the FN menu itself. It improves things some, and it's probably the most useful of the "advanced" controls.The ability to use FN or some other button to go into a quick menu, like the My Menu function on the Nikon DSLRs, would have been incredible, and would have really brought quicker handling to the camera.In short, there is a certain degree of customization I've come to expect from an "advanced" compact camera. The P330 falls short here, rather severely, and that compromises what could otherwise be an excellent camera for advanced users.I would have loved an external charger, the internal charging wasn't apparent to me on looking over the product. Easily remedied by buying third party batteries and a charger. I'm on the fence about this one... In some ways, it simplifies what you have to carry. However, it makes an extra battery about useless. You basically have to treat it like a smartphone. Which would be fine if it used the same size USB cable as anything else I had, but of COURSE it's different. If the battery lasted longer, then this wouldn't be as much of an issue.Slow image-to-image shots if you aren't in a continuous mode, and it takes a long time to write to the card. Might as well get some coffee if the buffer is full, you won't be doing anything for a while.It's not all bad news, though. The built-in ND filter is very unusual for the class, and if you aren't screwing with settings, the handling is great and the shutter is responsive. Still handles quite good, for a coolpix. Does a wonderful job with exposure and auto white balance. And again, impeccable image quality.I'm really torn on this. I want to love it for the output and features, but the usability suffers. If you don't care about the handling I care about, it's outstanding. I suspect that I will like it over time, but I'm not in love with it just yet. For my portability and
Скроменый эксперт
12.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This is going to be a long review but before I start, I don't want to scare anyone.. this camera is not hard to use, anyone could use it.However, I want to emphasize how this camera could satisfy a most hard core photographer among us, even those who shoot in manual and RAW modes.This review is from a photography enthusiast. I am a hobbyist, not a pro, but I am serious about my hobby. I own cameras like the Nikon D600, D5100, Olympus m4/3 system and their excellent e-pm2. I've owned Canon DSLRs and SLRs, even their tiny ELPH 300, I've started with photography in early 90s, with a 35mm Nikon FM2 camera.Let's start with the reason why anyone serious about photography would buy this camera. The word is: size. If you're looking for image quality, value, control, feel.. DSLRs, m4/3 cameras have that. But what they all lack is the ability for you to put the camera in a pocket and always have it on you. But would it be possible to still retain some of the control "big" cameras offer even in a tiny pocketable point and shoot camera?I started my search for an advanced point and shoot few months back and everything led me to the Sony's excellent rx100. But something kept me from pulling the trigger and getting it. Maybe it was the $650 price tag. And it's not that I couldn't afford it, but I wanted something I wouldn't have to baby. If I dropped it, I wouldn't be too upset about it. Something in a small package that could give near enough decent pictures bigger cameras can produce and give me the control that I want.I have not considered many Canon options, just because I am not a fan of the Canon UIs. I have owned multiple Canons in my life and they were all fine cameras, it's just not my preference. So keep that in mind, there may be a Canon camera out there that may suit you better, I just haven't considered it for personal (and subjective) reasons.I have however considered cameras from the following manufacturers: Sony, Olympus, Panasonic, Fujifilm and Ricoh. After a lot of deliberation I came down to the following choices.- Sony: rx100, pound for pound champ, point and shoot. Huge image quality from a tiny camera. Not without its issues. Sony UI is not the most intuitive to me. Battery life may be of a concern, however ~300 shots is plenty for me. It is slightly bigger than the Coolpix P330 and like I explained slightly more than I wanted to spend.- Panasonic: Lumix LX-7. Great camera. This was the closest contender. I handled one actually from a friend who owns one. Camera feels solid, I thought it felt better than Coolpix P330. It is bigger as well though. This was the main concern, as well as the issue of a lens cap. Although the latter has a solution in form of a foldable lens cap that can be obtained for ~$10. Fantastic Leica lens as well. There was even a recent sale of this camera at $300. Similar sensor size as the P330 and without any scientific tests I am assuming should be capable of similar if not better picture quality properties as the P330.Since size was the main criteria for the pick, here is the reference comparaison tool that I used to drive my decision: [...]I have received the camera few days ago and have put it trough its paces. I mostly shoot in manual mode on my DSLRs but I do like Aperture Priority as well on my smaller cameras. I exclusively shoot RAW, as I enjoy post processing and the flexibility RAW files provide in post. I would have been happy with just the ability to disable noise reduction but having RAW is so much better. On the topic of Noise Reduction. I am not a fan of it, I don't like how it tends to turn images into mush. I would much rather have noise, and convert the image to black and white if the noise was an issue. I find it quite annoying that point and shoot cameras or smart phone cameras don't have a way to disable noise reduction.Pros: - Size. This camera is not only tiny and easily fits in my pockets, it is also very light. (I've uploaded an image of the camera next to my D600 for size comparaison) - Relatively fast lens (good low light performance). f/1.8 at the wide end, similar to the rx100 in aperture. - RAW support. It is so nice having this. This means you can rescue badly exposed images and manage the tonal quality not possible with jpegs. - Manual Exposure: ISO, shutter speed, aperture size are all easy to adjust. If you want to get creative and do some light painting you can. The camera even has a Neutral Density filter option. Haven't had a chance to test it yet. - 1/1.7" sensor and low megapixel count. Bigger than the 1/2.3" sensor size which ships in most point and shoot cameras, combined with lower than average megapixel count. Means, photo cells on the sensor can gather more light, resulting in better low light performance (less noise). I am getting relatively low levels of noise at ISO 800, and ISO 1600 is better than expected. I commend Nikon for electing to go with a low megapixel sensor despite the trend of "more megapixel the better" marke
Скроменый эксперт
02.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Just a few thoughts after a week of limited use.I wanted a point & shoot camera that would fit in my pocket to carry at all times. I am a pro photographer but don't want always to be hauling a bag of heavy DSLR's around. But the camera had to have the following:-1. Small and well made.2. 24mm equivalent lens at the short end. Didn't care much about the tele end so 120mm was more than enough for my needs.3. Need WiFi connection so could fire and view what camera was seeing from my cell phone or tablet.4. Needed RAW file format.5. GPS nice addition but not the most important thing for me - I could live without it.Well the P330 has all the above and I can tell you that can be hard to find in a small point and shoot (I consider the Canon G15 too big and besides I have a G11).Noise levels seem low at 400 ASA I have not tested at higher ISO's but hardly ever use them. In Photoshop CS6 the noise in a blue sky looked good and with noise reduction applied it then just about disappeared. I have the noise set to LOW in the camera as didn't want to softern the image - although that may not happen with this camera. There is a LOW, MEDIUM and HIGH setting for noise.I found setting the aperture hard to figure out as I kept mis-reading the book. In Apperture Priority or Manual the aperture is set by turning the 4 way controler on the back of the camera and I was pressing different sides of this wheel.The ON/OFF button is flush with the top of the camera body so it is best to turn on or off the camera by using a finger nail tip rather than the pad of the finger. It is designed this way (I guess) to stop the camera being accidently turned on or off during use.Images seem sharp and what you see on the view finder (no viewfind eyepeice) is what you get as far as exposure goes.I put a 64GB SanDisk 45MB/sec card in it and that works fine. Thats about all I can contribute for now. I am sure more detailed reviews will appear shortly. But I'm happy with this well made and good looking camera.Oh, I do have one issue with Nikon. There appears to be only the limited VIEW NX2 software (that came on CD with the camera) to convert the cameras RAW files (NRW format, not NEF) into TIFF or JPEG. I think Nikon could have updated CAPTURE to co-inside with this camera launch. It does not even appear to be included in the next Adobe Camera RAW conversion update for Photoshop. Too many RAW formats nobody can keep up - apparently even the camera manufactures. That's as of today April 2, 2013.Correction: As of today April 4, 2013 Adobe have just released Camera RAW update 7.4 and included the NRW format used by the Nikon P330- yea!!! It appears to see the camera as the Nikon P6000 but looks to be making the corrections OK. My earlier information was incorrect. Life just got a whole lot better for NRW shooters, which is the only way to go for serious picture takers. JPG's are fine for snapshots.New Update June 14, 2013: Adobe just added the P330 to their ACR lens corrections a few days ago (around 6/7/2013). I took the camera to Thailand and used it daily where it replaced DLSR's and tripod some days unless I was planning something serious. I set the ISO to Auto, something I would not do for serious photography but liked the results better than flash, which is unpredictable for quick pickup and shoot pics. I know many would disagree and that's OK but as a pro I find I have to take several shots before the flash lights the subject just right, unless you get lucky. I have a very high regard for this little dude. Of couse it's not perfect - what is?. It may not be your personal first choice but with its W/A lens (24mm on 35mm camera) and slips into pocket unnoticed, I'm just glad I laid my money down.
Скроменый эксперт
09.10.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I was looking for a camera that I could take with me when I travel. My want list was: GPS tagging, HDR or exposure bracketing, panorama, RAW, and a ND filter, 1/1.7" sensor, and most important - pocketable. I, of course, ruled out the G15, Olympus xz-1 and 2, and the Lumix LX-7 due to size. My other options were a travel zoom, such as the SZ30. Without sacrificing image quality and my want list, the only two cameras that met my requirements were the Nikon P330 and Canon S100. I didn't want to have to worry about the lens problem, so I crossed off the S100. That left me with on choice, the P330. I also wanted wifi, but the P330 is compatible with eye-fi cards and has an optional adapter. When it went on sale for $296, I didn't hesitate.Now, after using it for 3 weeks, here are my impressions:The good:- Great size - pocketable, but not too small that it becomes unusable.- Comfortable to hold- Very light weight making it more comfortable in a pocket.- Great features. Has it all. Wish the Panorama mode didn't limit you to 180 degrees or 360 degrees.- Very very good picture quality. Better than a P&S. Obviously, not as good as a DSLR.- RAW files are very detailed. Can really get a lot from the RAW files if you want to spend time post processing- great for scenery/landscape- great for portraitsThe Bad:- Feels cheap and plastic. However, this is also good as it makes it light weight. You decide.- Slow UI. Navigating through the menus is slow, requiring multiple presses of the same button before a response.- Slow performance. Not the camera for action shots, or if you are in a hurry.- Slow focus in low light. Sometimes have to switch to manual as the AF won't work.- not great for moving objectsHonestly, that's about it for the bad. I do not have an issue with the on/off button, except that it is small. I will mainly use the camera for travel and geo tagging where it will always be with me. My Pentax K-30 takes outstanding images, but too big for travel. Most of my travel pictures are scenic areas of interest, which makes this camera perfect. Up to this point I have been using my iPhone 4S when I don't have my DSLR. The iPhone image quality is not even close to the P330 image quality. Yes, the slowness of the UI, and focus can be frustrating. But, if Nikon ever gets their head out of their arse, a firmware update can easily fix these issues. Overall, it fits my needs. It is not a speed demon. If I am going to take any kind of action shot, or have my DSLR available, I will choose it over the P330. But, to me, the excellent image quality of the P330 far exceeds the bothersome slowness of the camera. I can live with the slowness, but never poor image quality. Obviously, the new Sony RX100ii at $700 will blow the P330 out of the water. But, for a second always have it with you camera, that takes excellent pictures, for under $300, I find it hard to beat.
Скроменый эксперт
23.03.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I've owned a couple of DSLRs and a bunch of pro-sumer/enthusiast compacts over the past decade. Not looking for professional results from this camera, just decently usable JPGs in all light conditions. I've used this camera for several months including 2 months of traveling. I'm about to carry it on a 2,650 mile thru-hike of the Pacific Crest Trail.First, the good.- The combination of exceptionally bright lens for a compact camera (f/1.8 at the wide end), and a larger sensor than usual, means that this camera has significantly more signal and less noise to work with in low-light situations than its peers. With practice and skill, you will get gorgeous handheld low-light photos out of this camera. ISO 400 looks great. ISO 800 is usable, but you lose some sharpness with Nikon's default noise reduction processing, which is pretty aggressive.- Also, the really wide 24mm equivalent is great, especially for landscapes and indoor shots. You can stand in a corner of a room and capture most of what's going on.- I chose this instead of the Canon S100/S110 because the lens gets brighter/wider and you can expose for longer: 60 seconds rather than 15.Now, the bad.- The UI is usable, but barely. A few things that should be quickly accessible are buried in the main menu. You can assign the function button to control the ISO setting, but then you need to dig into the menu to change white balance. Nikon's interface feels much clunkier than Canon's, for example. In manual mode, the top dial (which controls shutter speed) is stiff and doesn't turn very smoothly. Not a big deal for me: I usually shoot in aperture priority mode, using the better rear dial.- There are some glitches, too. Sometimes, the camera doesn't turn on, and you need to remove and re-insert the battery. This happens to me every couple of days on a hiking trip. Only takes a few seconds to fix, but sometimes you miss the shot.- You can only charge with the included USB cable using the included AC adapter, not from another source of USB power. Lame!On balance, if you are patient enough to deal with the barely functional UI, you will be rewarded with exceptionally good low-light performance and image quality for a compact camera.
Скроменый эксперт
01.03.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I'll try to make this short and informative, and helpful to those in the market for a compact camera.I bought the p330 because of the name, the available features, and the price. At the time of this review, I paid a little bit over $250 here in Amazon. This is also considered as discontinued because the p340 is out already. Regarding the p340, I believe the only difference is the built-in wifi, more scene options, tenths of ounces lighter, etc... not that would be significantly different from the p330 that I care about.I chose Nikon because simply, I'm used to the Nikon UI. I had the D60 and the D90 and was pretty happy with the user-friendly menus ergonomics, and I've never had an issue so far.Now in regards to features/body, I really like the simplicity of the design. Being a minimalist, I like the matte black color uni-color of the body with no colorful accents. It also has a square-ish design rather than rounded, and no bulking portion aside from the lens. Not too much buttons but not too few. I've only used the camera for a day at the beach and so far I've gotten acquainted with the menu and buttons. A few things that I've noticed so far:1) I wish I could assign the FN button to adjust exposure comp. The settings that I could assign the FN button for seems very limited.2) I wish I the lens would pop back in when I'm in play mode (pic review).3) I wish the on/off button isn't as close to the shutter button as I keep on pressing the shutter when I'm trying to turn the camera off.4) After I recorded a video and turned the camera off, when I wanted to turn it back on, it wouldn't. I had to take out the battery and put it back in to get the camera to turn off. This happened about two or three times. I bought the Nikon wireless adapter as well and had not have any issues so far. I've transferred a couple of images to an iphone and it worked. Setting up the connection is needs a little bit of work but once you're connected it's pretty easy to upload files.Now for the pic quality, I think they're great. For the price and for being a compact camera, I'm glad there's Manual mode to adjust shutter and aperture.These are all I have since I've only had the camera for one day. Hopefully I can add more into this review sometime in the future.
Показаны отзывы 25-48 из 116.
