Отзывы о Объектив Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
159 отзывов пользователей o Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
Пользовались
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Duncan
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
UPDATE (to my review below): Everything said below is accurate (to me) but I have found one major downfall with this lens. The lens flare/ghosting is horribly unnatural and just ruins photos. My other lenses are not this dramatic. Taking photo's into the sun or just off center produces unpredictable results. A huge issue for landscape photo's. I have not removed 'stars' at this price point (more expensive lenses do this too) but do take note for your intended purpose (sun rise/set photo's). I have attached pictures of what I am talking about.
======================
Let’s face it people, don't fool yourselves, camera equipment and post processing has gotten Soooo good, the only reason someone cannot get great pictures is skill, vision, conditions, chance and a lot of luck. Stop blaming lenses or your camera body, this lens will not save you. Unless you are PRINTING pictures larger than 10”x6”, most 1080P computer monitors are only 2 megapixels, 4K is only 9MP. That’s right, your 25MP camera can only be reproduced at 2MP on a 1080P monitor. It does give you freedom to crop mind you.
In fact, if your pictures are 100% tack sharp, perfectly lit corner to corner, they are probably not very interesting anyway. Just search for "most expensive photographs ever". You'll see 99% of them are grainy, blurry and corners are dark.
You are not buying this lens for image quality, for which it is VERY good (most are), you are buying it for light weight, small size, low cost and portability. I will not review lens parameters as this is listed all over the web. The only thing this lens is missing is Image Stabilization, which could be had with the EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM at four times the price, more weight and larger size. If this lens had IS, it would be a home run.
Case in point, I will post three VERY mundane pictures (F2.8 1/320sec, ISO-100) that I have taken hand held on an overcast sky. First is original, the next two VERY cropped. No post processing has been added (i.e. no sharpening, saturation, corner falloff correction at F2.8). This is taken on a Canon T1I (2009) in JPG (not RAW). You can see balls of water frozen in midair and the ribs in the rebar that are undetectable in the original full size. The cropped pictures are only 457KB & 116KB when I uploaded it and that is before Amazon messes with it. Last picture is not usable but am just pointing out the detail. Do these sharp "details" make this a good picture (no)? If you want/need 24mm @ F2.8 in a small, light, inexpensive package, just buy it already it's great.
======================
Let’s face it people, don't fool yourselves, camera equipment and post processing has gotten Soooo good, the only reason someone cannot get great pictures is skill, vision, conditions, chance and a lot of luck. Stop blaming lenses or your camera body, this lens will not save you. Unless you are PRINTING pictures larger than 10”x6”, most 1080P computer monitors are only 2 megapixels, 4K is only 9MP. That’s right, your 25MP camera can only be reproduced at 2MP on a 1080P monitor. It does give you freedom to crop mind you.
In fact, if your pictures are 100% tack sharp, perfectly lit corner to corner, they are probably not very interesting anyway. Just search for "most expensive photographs ever". You'll see 99% of them are grainy, blurry and corners are dark.
You are not buying this lens for image quality, for which it is VERY good (most are), you are buying it for light weight, small size, low cost and portability. I will not review lens parameters as this is listed all over the web. The only thing this lens is missing is Image Stabilization, which could be had with the EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM at four times the price, more weight and larger size. If this lens had IS, it would be a home run.
Case in point, I will post three VERY mundane pictures (F2.8 1/320sec, ISO-100) that I have taken hand held on an overcast sky. First is original, the next two VERY cropped. No post processing has been added (i.e. no sharpening, saturation, corner falloff correction at F2.8). This is taken on a Canon T1I (2009) in JPG (not RAW). You can see balls of water frozen in midair and the ribs in the rebar that are undetectable in the original full size. The cropped pictures are only 457KB & 116KB when I uploaded it and that is before Amazon messes with it. Last picture is not usable but am just pointing out the detail. Do these sharp "details" make this a good picture (no)? If you want/need 24mm @ F2.8 in a small, light, inexpensive package, just buy it already it's great.
shalbk
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
If you are a vlogger or need generous wide field of view then this lens is must have. For shooting a product videography and reviews nothing can beat this lens. It has got good lie light performance. STM preforms smooth and silently. Compared to 50 mm f1.8 this lens can well be your day to day shooter. If you are into street photography then too this lens is perfect. Sharpness is not as great as that of 50mm but all in all of you are stepping into some serious photography then this lens is must have. If your are into wildlife photography and you need closeups of course you can't go to close to lion to film the king, in that case it's not ment for you. Though for a day to day usage and every other kinds of photography and videography I recommend this lens.
Kartik
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I love this lens
Ed Sedlak
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
We exchanged our 50mm 1.8 lens for this 24mm one because it has a wider field of view.
The 50mm was also excellent but brought the subject a little too close for our use.
This 24mm is a great general use lens for low-light indoor pics as well as crisp outdoor pics. Much better than the 18-55mm kit zoom lens that came with the camera.
Very happy so far.
The 50mm was also excellent but brought the subject a little too close for our use.
This 24mm is a great general use lens for low-light indoor pics as well as crisp outdoor pics. Much better than the 18-55mm kit zoom lens that came with the camera.
Very happy so far.
Ravi Lakra
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
My favorite lens ever since I started using it. It's an EF-S lens meant only for cropped sensor camera bodies. 24mm x 1.6 = 38mm field of view. Which is a very good focal length for general, street, landscape & even for portraits with wider aperture f/2.8, doesn't create much distortion. The image quality is sharper than the usual kit lens. It's small & lighter but well built which makes it easier to carry anywhere along with you. The STM auto focus is very smooth and fast but the manual focusing is just not as good. At under 10k this lens is worth investing in.
N Satyarthi
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
ItS focus on a subject is amazing, and the bokeh background turns out very good.
Con: you can’t zoom in or out.
Pro: handy, light weight, good picture quality
Con: you can’t zoom in or out.
Pro: handy, light weight, good picture quality
HavvkEyes
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Great lens for night shots.
Love the size. Fits in pockets no problem.
Attached test of lens.
Love the size. Fits in pockets no problem.
Attached test of lens.
Siva
08.01.2021
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I had the Canon 50mm and got this to complement it but I never seemed is this. The 50mm is always fun to shoot with but this is useful if you do a lot of landscapes or macro photography.
Vancouverite
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Good pancake lens. Good focal length to shoot pictures for small parties.
Would recommend to buy this before ef 50mm for beginner photographers
Would recommend to buy this before ef 50mm for beginner photographers
Daniele
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Un obiettivo davvero leggero, molto nitido e con una buona messa a fuoco automatica. Leggera vignettatura che si può tranquillamente eliminare in post produzione. Davvero consigliato!
Chantel
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Probably my new favorite lens. Yes the lens is a little loud on autofocus, so not completely Ideal for video. However it's awesome for experimenting with astro photography or taking photo's in lower lighting.
Troydon Dcruz
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Really versatile amd sharp lens.... Great for street shooting.... Even for everyday documentary style shoot... Outstanding lens overall
Ana N.
08.01.2021
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Estoy encantada con este objetivo ! tal y como me esperaba. aunque si es cierto que yo lo queria para video y me he encontrado que el enfoque hace un ruido robotico bastante alto para mi gusto
Tree
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm an amateur/beginner in photography and this is a great lens when shooting on the go! I take it hiking and on day adventures in this city and I love how it cuts down on the bulk!
umashankar
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Lens is too sharp..good with full frame camera. First step for candid and portrait photographers
Alec B.
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is an amazing pancake lens. It is a great addition to my setup. I love the compact size, it's light weight and the build quality. I am very pleased with the sharpness. I love it for video, STM is virtually silent.
Jas Kambo
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is one of the first lenses i got for my Canon SL2 and I'm so happy I did. I use this lens for so much. The price on this is a steal and I definitely recommend it for anyone that is starting out.
Jacopo
08.01.2021
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Inizio dicendo che io ho provato questo 24mm e il 50mm su una canon2000D. L'obbiettivo ha dei pro e alcuni contro(sopratutto paragonandolo con il 50mm):
PRO:
-leggero e piccolo
-ottimo per fotografie da interni e paesaggi sia grazie alla luminosità che all'angolo di visione(è un 24mm ma su aps-c diventa circa 38mm) quindi vantaggioso rispetto un 50mm che non permette foto in luoghi con poco spazio
-messa a fuoco silenziosa
-qualità dell'immagine bella ma forse un 50mm dà più soddisfazione
-con tanta luce è più semplice da usare di un 50mm perché meno luminoso e si farà più fatica a bruciare le zone più luminose (consiglio comunque di fotografare in RAW e poi di elaborare le foto con lightroom)
CONTRO:
-in controluce la messa a fuoco può far fatica
-l'effetto sfuocato pensavo fosse più presente essendo 2.8 ma invece rispetto il 50mm(che però è 1.8) c'è un abisso
-le immagini sono nitide ma non quanto un 50mm
In sostanza se uno può permetterselo economicamente consiglio di comprare sia un 50mm sia questo 24mm in quanto sono complementari e in base alle situazioni si può decidere quale usare.
Se invece bisogna scegliere uno dei due:
-50mm per ritratti(all'aperto o perlomeno dove si ha molto spazio visto che su aps-c diventa un 75mm) dove si vuole un bell'effetto sfuocato
-24mm per ritratti dove si ha poco spazio(con un effetto sfuocato nettamente ridotto) e per foto di paesaggi
-Per lo street-photography sono belli entrambi ma bisogna tenere conto dei pro e dei contro
Comunque hanno entrambi un'ottima qualità prezzo(100-150€) e li consiglio
PRO:
-leggero e piccolo
-ottimo per fotografie da interni e paesaggi sia grazie alla luminosità che all'angolo di visione(è un 24mm ma su aps-c diventa circa 38mm) quindi vantaggioso rispetto un 50mm che non permette foto in luoghi con poco spazio
-messa a fuoco silenziosa
-qualità dell'immagine bella ma forse un 50mm dà più soddisfazione
-con tanta luce è più semplice da usare di un 50mm perché meno luminoso e si farà più fatica a bruciare le zone più luminose (consiglio comunque di fotografare in RAW e poi di elaborare le foto con lightroom)
CONTRO:
-in controluce la messa a fuoco può far fatica
-l'effetto sfuocato pensavo fosse più presente essendo 2.8 ma invece rispetto il 50mm(che però è 1.8) c'è un abisso
-le immagini sono nitide ma non quanto un 50mm
In sostanza se uno può permetterselo economicamente consiglio di comprare sia un 50mm sia questo 24mm in quanto sono complementari e in base alle situazioni si può decidere quale usare.
Se invece bisogna scegliere uno dei due:
-50mm per ritratti(all'aperto o perlomeno dove si ha molto spazio visto che su aps-c diventa un 75mm) dove si vuole un bell'effetto sfuocato
-24mm per ritratti dove si ha poco spazio(con un effetto sfuocato nettamente ridotto) e per foto di paesaggi
-Per lo street-photography sono belli entrambi ma bisogna tenere conto dei pro e dei contro
Comunque hanno entrambi un'ottima qualità prezzo(100-150€) e li consiglio
Helladog
08.01.2021
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I’ve been using this lens as my everyday lens for a month now, and love the deep bokeh possible at f/2.8. I bought this instead of the “nifty-fifty” EF lens as it is similar considering the crop factor, in both focal distance and especially aperture. The 50mm f/1.8 becomes an f/2.9 on an EF-S body. The 35mm macro would be a closer match but considerably more expensive. Of course with the 35mm you get image stabilization and the ability to do extreme closeups.
Picture quality is likely somewhat better than the kit lens, but when I use a RAW editor, I don’t notice a great difference; the benefits are in better low light functionality, less chromatic aberration, and deeper bokeh.
I recommend this lens to anyone looking to get a nice decently wide prime lens on a budget.
Picture quality is likely somewhat better than the kit lens, but when I use a RAW editor, I don’t notice a great difference; the benefits are in better low light functionality, less chromatic aberration, and deeper bokeh.
I recommend this lens to anyone looking to get a nice decently wide prime lens on a budget.
Alessandro
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Ho tirato fuori dall'armadio la vecchia ma valida eos 350d aps-c e ho cominciato a fare street photography. Però col battery grip e il tamron 24/70 non sempre passavo innosservato. Ho rivoluzionato l'approccio togliendo battery grip e sostituendo l'ottica con questa. Ora sembra una compatta evoluta. Poi per chi come me ha una certa eta' avere un solo obbiettivo fisso e non uno zoom è un tornare alle origini perché una volta le reflex venivano vendute col 50 mm, ottica alla quale questa a conti fatti si avvicina (24*1.6=38).
Non sempre da ragazzi si riusciva ad acquistare subito una seconda ottica e questo fattore ci portava, nostro malgrado, a divenire "esperti" fotografi perché col solo 50 mm dovevamo coprire alla meglio tutti gli ambiti fotografici, avvicinandoci o allontanandoci dal soggetto. Ecco, questa è un ' ottica che porta a fare questo non potendo zoomare comodamente da lontano. A questo punto consiglio anche, ai giovani, di provare virtualmente il fascino della pellicola simulandola con pochi accorgimenti: oscurare lo schermo così da non controllare lo scatto, imporsi un valore ISO, qualsivoglia, e non cambiarlo al variare dell'illuminazione e, importantissimo, scattare SOLO 36 scatti, che era la misura del rullino. Avere a disposizione solo 36 scatti e, ancora meglio, scattare in manuale o al massimo in priorità tempi o diaframmi, ma non in automatico, può solo far bene alla fotografia vostra e allo spirito di chi poi guarderà quanto prodotto.
CONCLUSIONE: l'ottica fa il suo dovere alla grande ed anche a tutta apertura mi è parsa avere una vignettatura contenuta peraltro presente anche in altre ottiche ben più costose. Per il costo tutto sommato contenuto non mi sono lamentato dell'assenza del paraluce. Anche lì questione di abitudine perché una volta erano sempre venduti separatamente. Un filtro uv lo consiglio per protezione agli urti. Dopo di che via, uscire a scattare variando orari e meteo con la consapevolezza di avere un ottica che se usata bene si presta a qualsiasi genere di fotografia.
Buona luce.
Non sempre da ragazzi si riusciva ad acquistare subito una seconda ottica e questo fattore ci portava, nostro malgrado, a divenire "esperti" fotografi perché col solo 50 mm dovevamo coprire alla meglio tutti gli ambiti fotografici, avvicinandoci o allontanandoci dal soggetto. Ecco, questa è un ' ottica che porta a fare questo non potendo zoomare comodamente da lontano. A questo punto consiglio anche, ai giovani, di provare virtualmente il fascino della pellicola simulandola con pochi accorgimenti: oscurare lo schermo così da non controllare lo scatto, imporsi un valore ISO, qualsivoglia, e non cambiarlo al variare dell'illuminazione e, importantissimo, scattare SOLO 36 scatti, che era la misura del rullino. Avere a disposizione solo 36 scatti e, ancora meglio, scattare in manuale o al massimo in priorità tempi o diaframmi, ma non in automatico, può solo far bene alla fotografia vostra e allo spirito di chi poi guarderà quanto prodotto.
CONCLUSIONE: l'ottica fa il suo dovere alla grande ed anche a tutta apertura mi è parsa avere una vignettatura contenuta peraltro presente anche in altre ottiche ben più costose. Per il costo tutto sommato contenuto non mi sono lamentato dell'assenza del paraluce. Anche lì questione di abitudine perché una volta erano sempre venduti separatamente. Un filtro uv lo consiglio per protezione agli urti. Dopo di che via, uscire a scattare variando orari e meteo con la consapevolezza di avere un ottica che se usata bene si presta a qualsiasi genere di fotografia.
Buona luce.
Wayne Chow
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Great little lens for video and photography. It is very small and light weight so i makes a great walk around lens. Combine this lens (any STM) with any Canon DLSR that has movie AF servo (auto focusing) and lens is relatively quiet, it still makes noise that internal camera mic picks up. At f/2.8 the lens makes noise as it hunts. At f/5.6 and higher the lens makes less noise as it doesn't hunt to focus as much. However, if you get an external mic like a Rode Video Micro it helps cut the lens noise. There are other STM lenses like the 50mm STM f/1.8 and the 40mm STM f/2.8. I like the 24mm f/2.8 the best of them all for video.
Amit Chauhan
08.01.2021
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have been using 24mm lens mostly for landscape and group photos. It is a versatile lens. At f2.8 @24mm, it does cover a lot of space and also at the same time gives decent bokeh affect. Lens is good for taking room photos where there is not enough space. Very lightweight and silent. If you are confused between 50mm f1.8 and 24mm f2.8, I would suggest to get both as both serve different purposes :).
PS: I am no longer using the 18-55mm kit lens after buying this one :) as the picture quality of this lens is far better than kit lens.
Pros:
Sharp photos
Lightweight
Faster autofocus
Versatile lens
Good for photography in room and tighter conditions
Cons:
Less background bokeh as it max out at f2.8
Overall good lens to have in the kit.
PS: I am no longer using the 18-55mm kit lens after buying this one :) as the picture quality of this lens is far better than kit lens.
Pros:
Sharp photos
Lightweight
Faster autofocus
Versatile lens
Good for photography in room and tighter conditions
Cons:
Less background bokeh as it max out at f2.8
Overall good lens to have in the kit.
Dhananjay
08.01.2021
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
If you have kit lens 18 55 then no need to buy this.. Just waste of money. Same result like kit lens. Use kit lens for indoor. And buy 50mm for outdoor. 50mm really worth.. Note:- i m experience about film making.
Matthew
08.01.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was looking or a prime for my 70D and am very pleased with this choice. I found using my 18-55mm lens that most of my shots were taken around 24mm. So I thought i'd give it a try. It was delivered quickly in the original box, and has been my go to ever since. the 2.8 f stop is good enough for most night shots. It's so compact it's easy to take anywhere.
Показаны отзывы 73-96 из 159.
