Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
547 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
03.01.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Excellent pocket camera with everything a lover of photography can expect. It is also made in Japan and very friendly to use.
Скроменый эксперт
16.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is a gift for my son who had one that was accidentally destroyed by his wife. He wanted another one, so based on that evidence am giving it 5 stars. He had said he was very pleased with the zoom and low light capability for pics. He was very satisfied with the video also.
Скроменый эксперт
16.12.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have a regular canon camera but the size and features of this camera made it easy to carry and use when I didn't have my regular camera with me.
Скроменый эксперт
25.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm a mother of three young children, so most of the pictures I take are of running kids inside the house. I'm also not skilled at all in photography. I've had three digital cameras before this one (one Nikon and two Kodaks), and I'm quite certain I'll remain a Canon customer from now on.The downsides of this camera are as follows:1. You must protect the front of the camera; the metal around the front lens is very delicate. My husband dented it even though it was in a case in his pocket, and he only sat down at the computer. When it was dented, the lens covers wouldn't retract. I used a knife blade to carefully flatten some of the dents, and it's worked normally since.2. You must also learn to hold this in a different way so the flash pops up. I looked at the instruction manual and it showed me to hold the camera in the nook between the extended forefinger and thumb of my left hand, with the forefinger along the bottom rather than up the side, and I've found this provides a much sturdier hold anyway.3. This doesn't have a dedicated sports setting, which I miss enough to mention, but not enough to curse the camera.4. Sometimes I've missed a picture because maybe I don't press the button long or hard enough.Now, on to the positives:1. The flash is great. Even in low and artificial light, it doesn't always use the flash, but the pictures turn out great. It doesn't wash people out, and it manages to capture what they really look like. I hated pictures of me taken with my old Kodak because I looked bloodless, but those of me taken with the Canon 230HS show me as the living, breathing person I am. I appreciate that.2. The Auto setting works very well. It accurately transitions from a Macro setting for taking pictures of my kids' drawings, to snapping one of them pulling a face, to taking a beautiful picture of the moon outside.3. I love the dedicated Video Recording button. It does have a Video setting, but why rotate the dial when I can just push a button?4. This is important: It has a fast processing speed. It takes almost no time to take a picture, record a video, and take another picture. My old Kodak had a 10 or 15 second delay between each of those settings, and it drove me mad.This takes pictures quickly, but you'll probably find you won't need to be taking picture after picture like I used to try to do because the Canon 230HS just plain and simple takes beautiful pictures. In other words, I've found I take fewer pictures now I've got this camera, because one good picture is worth 10 mediocre pictures.This camera was expensive for me, but it is worth the price. It works well in low light, takes beautiful pictures, and works quickly. I strongly recommend it to others.
Скроменый эксперт
07.12.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The camera works well. I should have paid closer attention to the rechargeable battery instead of replaceable batteries. A second rechargeable battery is pricey.
Скроменый эксперт
27.11.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I wrote this review a few weeks ago. All reviews got moved for some reason, but now the camera is offered at $100 less than what I paid for it, making it a very good deal indeed.I got this camera after returning a Sony HX9V - and I am very happy with my choice. I still think that the Sony HX9V and Nikon 9100 run the Canon very close, but this is the best choice for me. One major criticism of the Canon is that the GPS doesn't work well - I don't use it, so no opinion. What I really wish is that Canon had offered the SX220 - the same camera without GPS - in the US! Here's what I like about the Canon:- Great value - now about $100 less than direct competitors.- Excellent image quality (with the exception of purple fringing)- full manual control, PASM modes (one of the main reasons I replaced the Sony)- Intuitive layout, responsive controls (especially if you've used Canons before)- Good focal range (though less than competitors)- some fun modes: I like toy camera, fish eye and color swap as toys. The high-speed video is very cool, but lo-res (VGA), which is fine with me since it's a gimmick I won't use often- good screen quality- decent low light performanceThere's things I don't like as well, though.- battery life. It's pretty weak, and the reason why I originally got the Sony. Luckily, batteries are cheap online.- the flash is very weak, and only illuminates the closest subjects. EDIT: not as weak as I thought. You can adjust flash power, but turning it up DECREASES flash power, turning it down increases it.- the flash always pops up when you turn on the camera, and it's in an inconvenient place.- the screen is 16:9 ratio - great for video, not for pictures- the video quality is ok, not great (24 frames/sec in full HD, no refocus while shooting)- deleting images takes too many button presses - a delete button would be helpfulUltimately, I think the Canon is great because of the image quality and the manual options. If you know something about photography, you will get more out of the Canon than out of the Sony or the Nikon. However, if you want a straighforward point and shoot, the Nikon is almost certainly better (though that has issues with long range autofocus and stabilization). If you want more, smarter options, the Sony is a better choice (but it suffers from slow operational speed and aggressive noise reduction - especially noticeable in portraits).In conclusion, I think the Canon is definitely a good camera, but whether it's the best for you really depends on your preferences. For me it works, though it would be much better still with better battery life, a 4:3 screen, and an extra (programmable) button (that could also be used to delete images in review mode)
Скроменый эксперт
01.12.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I love this camera. It takes beautiful video and pictures and they are crisp and clear. I have owed this camera for several years and I have not had any problems with it.
Скроменый эксперт
19.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
bought this camera as I lost my previous Canon camera and had to have another. This camera is awesome for us amateurs. For what i use and need a camera for this one does everything.
Скроменый эксперт
17.09.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I got this camera and was immediately pissed off because a week later it was discounted heavily in the stores. I was happy with the camera for quite awhile despite the price issue. But several months ago I started having some trouble with it being blurry. Not sure what is going on, haven't had the time to devote to try and figure it out, instead, I grab my husbamds better camera.
Скроменый эксперт
16.09.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
My daughter bought this camera specifically for going to concerts. The quality of the video and photos she takes with this camera are awesome. Even when she is far away from the stage, she is able to zoom in and get really good quality shots. But, be sure to keep an 2nd, fully charged battery on hand, as the camera uses the battery up quickly when using the video feature.
Скроменый эксперт
05.05.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The Canon PowerShot SX230 HS produces images of very good quality and the video HD 1080p quality is just simply, stunning when displayed on an HDTV. I like to get an image the highest quality that I can first "capture" and then downgrade from there.The SX230 is designed in the sleek, minimalist spirit of the ELPH series, though longer and slightly thicker than its ultra-compact brand-mates. This fits my style perfectly for my daily use.Anti-shake works very well when hand-holding the camera in low-light conditions or when using the telephoto end of the zoom range. I took some pictures of the full moon in low light conditions (I used a tripod) and it blew me away how this inexpensive camera performed.I am very pleased with this camera overall as it is my third point and shoot camera from Canon. It is a jack-of-all-trades for Canon Point and shoot market.A couple of little annoyances about it:The pop-up flash seems to always pop up whether needed or not.The GPS feature works pretty good, but here's my tip to conserve battery life and to get the best GPS signals when you need them. Keep the GPS Logger in the OFF position and the GPS in the ON position.Right before you take your picture that you want the GPS location, go to the menu and THEN turn ON GPS Logger. It seems this approach provides a greater chance of gathering many satellites so that you can snag your position. I tried not turning on the logger function and just leaving the GPS on and it was frustrating that I was only getting 2 images with tags out of 50 pictures taken and my success rate increased after I modified my approach.I read a lot of complaining about the battery life consumption with leaving the GPS Logger on and it is true as this logs your position even when the camera is turned off. This logger is used if you want to view the route you have traveled on a map.I paid 198.88 from Amazon when I bought this in December 2011...I guess because Canon was/had introduced their 2012 model of this camera. I don't regret it at ALL. I am thrilled over this camera for the price I paid and its features.
Скроменый эксперт
14.11.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Bought this camera for daughter to take to school, but after 1 year the phone is the only thing being used. Loved the Canon product and camera still working fine.
Скроменый эксперт
13.04.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm going to the UK in June for two weeks, so I wanted to buy a new camera. Like many people, I was debating between Canon's S95 and the SX230. I chose the SX230 for the following reasons:-- ZOOM! Many photographers claim that zoom is overrated, that you should always "zoom with your feet". That's good advice, but think about those times when you're at a crowded tourist attraction and you can't get right up to your photographic target. Sometimes you may want to take a picture of something really high up. Also, it can allow you to achieve the illusion of closeness in your shots without disturbing the scene.-- 1080p video with optical zoom. S95 has 720p with digital zoom only. Most people won't need a dedicated camcorder if they get this camera.-- Picture quality. Yes, the S95 has the best picture quality, and that f2.0 lens in low light can't be beat. However, the picture quality of the SX230HS is very good, and the high-sensitivity sensor makes up for a lot of the shortcomings of the slower lens. If you're upgrading from an Elph that was made 3-4 years ago, you'll be really impressed.-- Size. Where else can you get all of these benefits in such a small size? It's not that much bigger than an S95, though it's significantly larger than some of the new Elphs. However, I don't need a featherweight camera. The SX230 fits in most pants pockets or in a belt case. I use this one:Caselogic TBC-302 Ultra Compact Camera Case with Storage (Black)-- It's made in Japan at an actual Canon factory.Now for the downsides.-- Battery life isn't as good as my old SD950IS, even though it uses the same battery (NB-5L). For my vacation I'll be taking the battery that came with my camera, the one from my old camera, and another one that I just ordered from Amazon.-- The location of the popup flash doesn't bother me too much. However, it tries to pop up every time the camera is turned on, and I wish that it would pop up only when needed.-- Focus speed could be a little faster, but it's not too much a problem if you half press before shooting. No point and shoot is going to be lightning quick; for fast action you need an SLR.-- Auto Mode seems to favor ISO 400 in the dark, even with flash enabled.-- It's a little pricey for a point and shoot in 2011. Normally I would wait for the price to go down a little bit, but I wanted the camera for my upcoming trip in June.It's not #1 at anything; the S95 has better image quality, the SX30 has more zoom, and the Elphs are smaller. However, I don't think you're going to find a better mix of features in this form factor.Update (9/2/11) -- This camera was definitely worth the money. My UK pictures were really good for the most part. Sometimes it would blow out the highlights, which is a common problem with most point and shoots; try lowering the exposure compensation if you see that happening. The indoor pictures that I took at museums and pubs were surprisingly good; I maybe used the flash 3 times on the whole trips. My friend dropped my camera from about 3 feet onto concrete -- aside from scratches on two corners the camera survived! On the other hand, the metal on the front of the lens is thin. The camera was in the front compartment of my carry-on bag, and the bag tipped over on top of it. The metal bent, and the lens covers wouldn't open anymore. After bending the metal back into place, the lens works perfectly again.
Скроменый эксперт
18.07.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I love this camera, but it takes some work to get out of it what you expect.Fully auto, this camera is not at its best. Even in 'SCN' mode, Taking a photo of the moon, at night, even using the requisite pre-set night mode, does not yield a decent photo. My best shots were when I put the camera in Aperature Priority, fiddling with the aperature, and adjusted the ISO manually down to 100. Then the camera was *significantly* *Faster*, like 1.5 or 2 seconds, as opposed to 10 seconds, per shot. Equally impressive, was using the camera in Full Manual, of course.Fireworks on the 4th of July didn't prove to be as expected either. After putting the camera in Fireworks mode, the shots I got were 10 seconds between exposures, and there was so much jitter that it didn't yield a decent picture of any of my shots. Perhaps a tripod would've helped, but I did steady the camera against a support on my porch. The exposure wait-time was interminable.What *really* surprised me was when a friend, who keeps her camera in Auto *all the time*, was taking crisper, sharper, and rich color shots - even of fireworks without being in Fireworks preset mode. She takes all her shots in full auto using her inexpensive Canon SX130. For point-and-shoot, with "Canon Color", (she takes incredible sunset shots, and landscape), the no-muss, no-fuss solution is the Canon SX130.I *love* my SX230, and all the options, advanced features and especially the flexibility it offers. Unfortunately, I don't believe the firmware is setup very well for "Auto", or "Easy Auto", *or* the presets for the SX230.Has someone else had a different experience? Perhaps my camera is bad? Can someone suggest what I might be doing wrong when using this camera in full auto, or using one of the Presets? I am open to suggestions.
Скроменый эксперт
11.10.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The best camera i have ever had. this is the camera you want. I never have to mess with any settings. I take shot after shot after shot and they all turn out high quality. You will not be disappointed with this camera. would definelty buy again.
Скроменый эксперт
12.10.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I got the best price possible on this camera. The Canon SX230 HS is an earlier model to the now current SX260 HS and the SX280 HS cameras. It has a lot of features for a travel zoom camera and does fairly well in low light situations.
Скроменый эксперт
18.12.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I am an advanced amateur photographer who owns roughly a dozen digital, 35mm, medium format, and large format film cameras. I bought this camera based on three criteria:1. Picture quality that almost rivals a DSLR.2. Portability. Small enough to carry in my pocket and take almost anywhere, hiking, skiing, and horseback riding.3. GPS. I take a lot of pictures while traveling in the back country, and I want to be able to locate scenes when I get back home.I am very happy with my choice. This is a great camera that COULD BE AWESOME if Canon would fix some annoying features and functions:1. Poor battery life. Very disappointing. Get at least two extra batteries, especially if you use the GPS a lot.2. Terrible flash position. Need I say more?3. Frivolous features such as "Color Swap", "Fish Eye Lens", "Miniature Effect", and "Toy Camera Effect" are included, instead of serious features such as Exposure Bracketing.4. Some of the functions are almost impossible to perform. For example, to lock the focus, one must "keep the shutter button pressed halfway and press the < button". If you are holding the camera correctly, you will need a third hand to do this.5. The overall build quality is excellent. However, the cover for the interface jacks seems rather fragile. I would have preferred rubber instead of plastic.6. The included software programs are a bit cludgy, and this release of the ZoomBrowser has omitted a feature, Camera Remote Control, that I use with my Canon S3 IS when digitizing 35mm slides.7. The User Guide provided on the CD is poorly organized, and the function descriptions are incomplete. For example, "When the camera is turned off, it will continue to receive a signal from GPS satellites for a certain interval of time...". It would be nice to know what that certain interval is, and how often route information is updated.8. The current GPS location cannot be viewed unless one takes a picture and then reviews the picture information. An active location display would be more appreciated than the real-time clock display that Canon has provided.9. One cannot change batteries if the camera is mounted on a tripod. (This would not be a big deal if the battery life were longer!)Overall, the optical quality is excellent for a camera this size. There is some barrel distortion at wide angle, but that is to be expected.I would not hesitate to recommend this camera, even with the above caveats. It's not a perfect camera...but then, there is no such thing, is there?
Скроменый эксперт
05.08.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I spent a few hours researching the best camera within my budget and this camera was the one I went with. I am very pleased with the camera & cannot believe how clear the shots are! The only negative thing is that you need to purchase an SD card for it right away as it has no internal memory and will not store anything without it. But all in all, I would recomend this camera to anyone looking for a great camera under $300.
Скроменый эксперт
14.08.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Have had this camera for app. 6 months now. It was purchased from eBay brand new and I am NOT a camera specialist.I replaced my bulky Canon SX20 which was bulky with the SX230HS based on countless reviews I read regarding quality, performance and video quality. I didn't expect exactly the same quality..but based on what I read, it should have come close. Here comes the quick review:Good:- I can deal with the proprietary battery. There a number of knockoff copies that are 1/10 the price. They just don't last as long..- Outdoor pictures have amazing colour depth- Options are relatively straight forward- Optical zoom shots are reasonable- Price; Great price point for the features..if they worked as expected...Bad:- Video is below what I expected. I find both indoor and outdoor somewhat grainy and constant refocusing in light changes- Sound on video is crackly from just the lightest adjustment of hand or wind or anything.- Indoor pictures are hit and miss. I really don't understand how crappy some reasonably lit photos can be. I took a recent photo at my daughters graduation that had plenty of lighting and a clear day outside through big windows. And, the photo was completely blurred. I have tried the quick touch to focus. But, this is again hit and miss.- Related to the above, I found focusing/lock takes WAY TOO LONG. I feel like I have force a shot at times...and it doesn't know what to do- A little thicker and heavier than I anticipated- Sports mode or lack of (speed shots) do not exist. Don't buy this camera for sporting events..All in all, disappointed. Canon name has taken a hit on this one in my books.
Скроменый эксперт
28.08.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have been a Canon fan and this one won't disappoint me. It's easy to use and great quality of both pictures and videos will make me come back for its future brands. The blue color costs about 30 bucks more but it is up to you to pay for the blue color. But overall this worth every penny that you spent in it.
Скроменый эксперт
24.11.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Having owned a good Canon camera in the past & after reading such good reviews posted for this camera, I got this camera for its compact size & zoom capability to replace an old Kodak bridge camera that I had which was malfunctioning (which took crystal clear pics before it deteriorated.) What a huge mistake!! This Canon camera takes all the joy out of taking pictures (never mind having mediocre images of your memories) b/c all-like over 90%- of the pics come out soft & not sharp, no matter outdoors or indoors. I guess if you never plan to print your pics or enlarge them, then it's not too much of an issue. At first I thought maybe I got a lemon or perhaps it's not fair to compare the results of a small camera to a bridge camera but after reading up on some negative reviews of another Canon bridge camera (the Canon SX 40) & viewing the uneditted soft pics of that camera on youtube, I realized that maybe this IS the level of image quality Canon is producing nowadays for it's AF cameras, so I will not take the risk of getting another Canon for my next camera purchase to replace this. On the plus side, the 14X zoom is pretty good, w/ the image quality not too much softer than the unzoomed pic & the camera does take good videos even in full zoom.
Скроменый эксперт
29.08.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have to admit, after reading all of these reviews, my review is going to seem very minimal. Bottom line: I've owned all different kinds of makes and models of point and shoot cameras and this one by Canon is by far, THE BEST! I have always stuck with other brands and why it took me this long to finally purchase a Canon, is beyond me. I've been missing out, for sure. Anyway, I got my camera only a couple of weeks ago and have not had the pleasure of trying every feature just yet. However I have taken pictures in the most difficult setting I usually come across - concerts! The low lighting at concerts makes even the best cameras out there seem like a piece of junk sometimes. I took a chance bringing this, a new camera, with me to the concert. You only get one shot at taking pictures at concerts so you better make it worthwhile. I had confidence this camera would be able to do its job and do it well. After reading all of the positive reviews and knowing Canon's excellent reputation - why not try it?! Well, it did not disappoint. It took fantastic shots. I've never been able to get such clear shots at any concert, sitting even closer than the 14th row, off to the side, as I did this concert. I wish I would have had this camera at all of my previous concerts. Since it was the American Idol concert, I knew this would be a great opportunity to test out the camera with both fast paced and slow paced acts. It took absolutely phenomenal shots of the lighting of the stage. I took pix from all different zoom ranges and they all came out fantastic! The zoomed out range looks professional. When I zoomed in on a slower act, non-moving, it looks as though I was right on stage with them and they are so clear. The fast-moving acts were a little more difficult to get a picture of but this camera did a great job. I was able to get some really unique action shots where the top half of their body would be super clear but their legs, which they were moving, would be in a weird, cool looking, action motion. When there were alot of Idols on stage at once, the camera was able to get clear shots of every one of them without zooming out too far. For example, I was able to get crystal clear shots of about 5 of them at once, in one shot, depending on the distance between them. I took some video and that came out wonderful: both audio and video. I do not use GPS therefore I have not even tried it. I found the battery life to be great and I had the camera on throughout the concert as well as usage for other things before and after the concert. I am very happy with this camera and it's just confirmation that I should have bought a Canon years ago. I've missed alot of great concert shots. I can say that I will forever buy Canon when it comes to cameras ... lesson learned. 5 Stars
Скроменый эксперт
07.07.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I've had this camera for a few weeks and spent some time with it in various conditions. I used it at a wedding, going rock climbing indoors and out, at a paintball field, and at night photographing fireworks. My impression so far is that this camera has the most flexibility in a point and shoot I've seen yet. The low light performance is really impressive; I can only imagine the S95 would be even better with a full F-stop wider lens. However, I have to say that the long lens on this SX230HS has really been more useful on multiple occasions. It's just fun to be able to get closer in certain conditions like on the paintball field or shooting details on buildings, or getting close up to the bride and groom, or even closer up shots of fireworks.It's not the most ergonomic camera ever; I'm sure you'll read about the flash positioning and small controls. The pop up flash is fine since 95% of the time I don't use flash. I simply hold it down while I turn on the camera and it's out of the way. But when I do need it, I have to turn the camera off and back on; a small inconvenience. The size is on the edge of being too big and heavy for a "back pocket" camera. I use a small neoprene bag with a carabiner clip. The LCD is beautiful, but the image frame is smaller than the whole LCD to make room for control displays; a little deceiving but it's high resolution makes up for the size.Some of the other controls take some getting used to; finding the manual controls and many modes. With that said though, the features of this camera are GREAT. Tons of diverse shooting features that meet all average user needs. There is an "easy shoot" mode which I find myself using if I am in a rush for a shot. I didn't find the problems one of the reviewers had with consistently blurry shots at all; when I put it on easy mode, pictures were crisp in most condition unless there was a ton of movement; at that point you're simply limited by physics... not enough light and too much movement = blur. With that said, my low light shots are exceptional for a point and shoot. I was so pleasantly surprised with fireworks.I don't really do videos but one very difficult video I did take in very low light very far away was jittery and the color was off. But in normal light and distance it's fine.Lastly, the complaints about battery life are totally valid. To give you an idea, I ran out of juice from a full charge from mid morning at the wedding to the beginning of the reception. I shot about 150 pics but kept the camera on a lot, zooming in and out. HOWEVER, I got a recharge and it does do that quite quickly. I would buy at least one if not two spare batteries for long trips with no power availability like backpacking or 3rd world travel.Anyway, this camera is really good enough for me to buy a second one as a gift to my brother. If you want a high end point and shoot that's still small enough to carry around in a jacket pocket, this is a great choice.
Скроменый эксперт
22.11.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The features of this camera are well described on its spec sheet and on the Canon website.Purchased it as a replacement for an A-710 which was my wife's "purse camera" until it was lost.The SX230HC is a definite improvement: It does have higher sensitivity, higher resolution and a wider zoom range. The images are reasonably noise free up to an ISO of about 400. The flash range is short, but decent for group shots up to about 10 or 11 feet away. Auto focus is fast and accurate.Like many small cameras, the close focus distance (in macro mode or not) is dependent of the zoom setting. At the longer focal lengths, focus is limited to 1 Meter and at the shortest focal lengths, it's limited to 5 cm. The close focus limit is displayed on the viewing screen as focal length is changed.The lens is quite sharp at the wide angle to to moderately long zoom settings. However at zoom settings of between 40 and 70 mm (the maximum for this lens) it becomes pretty soft and looses contrast. Image stabilization is quite good (around 2.5 stops), with mid zoom range images of stationary objects possible down to 1/8 to 1/15th. sec hand held. Because of its small size, and the location of the pop-up flash, this is not an easy camera to hold, however, with a little practice one can adapt to it. Using the wrist strap is essential if you don't want to drop this camera!My wife's biggest complaint is the view screen. Indoors in moderate light it's fine, but outdoors in bright sunlight, it's difficult to compose a shot, especially of a moving or sports scene. Our "old" A-710 had an optical viewfinder that was much better (in daylight), but today its almost impossible to find a low cost pocket camera that includes one.Some owners have complained of short battery life, but we're getting around 200 shots without flash or 120-140 with flash. Considering the small size and light weight of the battery, that seems more than reasonable. My wife always carries a couple of charged batteries with her, but very seldom need to change the battery.Summery: A decent "pocket" camera capable of recording excellent images in medium to bright conditions at most settings of its zoom lens. Good, but not outstanding battery life, weak built-in flash (typical of cameras this size), and viewfinder that is not great in bright sunlight. Small, light, fast operating.Remember: "The best camera is the one you have."Overall: A decent camera capable of taking excellent images
Показаны отзывы 121-144 из 547.
