Отзывы о Мфу Canon Pixma G3410
921 отзывов пользователей o Canon Pixma G3410
Пользовались
Canon Pixma G3410?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
22.03.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Mac based review. Ran this printer for 5 months. Networking issues galore. Once one computer is removed from the network, the other computers must connect to the printer in a different manner. This forced re-installation of the software on all computers each time. Not very practical when I have to take my macbook with me when I go. Re-installed software on 4 computers, 5 times while I owned it, ridiculous! Was ready to replace it anyway when it finally gave me an unrecognizable print ink error right when I needed to print a boarding pass before leaving for the airport. No more time or patience for this nonsense. Spend your $80 on something else. Also no way to print from mobile devices, iphones, ipads, etc. Too bad...have had good luck with Canon in the past. Went with the HP 6510 ($149) that doesn't have a fax, which is a bummer especially if I want to send documents to 1986. The HP does print from mobile devices, and so does the HP 5510 ($79). Let you know how the HP works out soon, setting it up now.
Скроменый эксперт
28.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I purchased four Dell AIO's,(needed 4 function printers), two years ago and all 4 quit working the same day. Dell's AIO's were beyond warranty by 2 months and we received no help from Dell service. Having paid $265 per machine, I was not going to go into sticker shock again and began researching AIO's that was comparable to Dell. The Canon PIXMA fit the bill for what we wanted and for $69.00 was far less expensive than any Dell printer. Ordered 4, received within four days. I am very pleased with these AIO's. Very easy to setup, but make sure you read the instructions before setting up. Wi-fi built in setup was completed within 7 minutes and when installed on one network, it automatically picked up the remainder computers.Print/copier works great, photos are crisper than Dell, scanning could be a problem as scans are set in PDF, so if you don't have Acrobat, you need OCR--yet, it scans very quickly. Faxing was confusing for receiving and is time consuming, but if you know you are receiving a fax, no problem because you need to be at the machine. Otherwise, you have to add an additional setup which we did not want to do. If you have a dedicated phone line, this is not an issue. Overall, I highly recommend this product because of cost (lowest price I found was on Amazon), quick printing, photos and setup. Some reviewers have said the Canon PIXMA is noisy, but compared to Dell it is a lamb.
Скроменый эксперт
10.07.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I am extremely pleased with this product. I am a freelance writer working from home, and I don't have to print large-scale jobs. This machine fits my needs perfectly. It is small and compact, fitting nicely into a small space and folding up when not in use so that nothing sticks out. (This is important not only because of space considerations, but also so that my cats don't decide to lie down on a feeder or output tray and possibly break it.) The cartridges are easy to change, and not overly expensive compared with those of other printers. The print quality is good. The print speed is rather slow, so the machine would not be appropriate for someone who regularly prints large-scale jobs.The copying function is similar in all respects to the printing function.The scan function is great! It creates PDFs of single- or multiple-page documents and gives you the option of where to file them or just saves them in a date-specific desktop file of scans.I have not had occasion to use the fax function. (The ease of scanning documents into PDFs and sending them via email pretty much makes faxing unnecessary.)The one thing I would change is that print jobs arrive in the output tray in opposite-page order. This means that I have to remember to specify that I want the document printed back-to-front, or be faced with the tedium of reversing the pages after printing. For some reason I can't seem to make this the default setting.There's a neat desktop icon that can be expanded to show separate icons for each function. Unfortunately, if the option of showing the single icon to avoid desktop clutter is used, that icon has a tendency to disappear, and I can't seem to get it back without rebooting. I'm not sure if that is a problem with the Canon machine or of Windows 7.All in all, I highly recommend this machine as an economical and efficient buy for a small home office.
Скроменый эксперт
29.11.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The case is ideal for carrying and protecting your camera when traveling. The S100 fits the case perfectly. Great value for the money.
Скроменый эксперт
29.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Easy to use, compact side, better night shot photos, bigger screen, easy to use especially for dummy, comparing to my Panasonic Lumix!
Скроменый эксперт
07.05.2012
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Simply do not expect DSLR performance from this Camera although the price is almost the same. I took over 1500 pictures for over a month and half and had no option but to return it since there was no justification for the price. Here are some basic drawbacks: There is no option to have flash on! The auto mode does not use flash when it is suppose to. The FPS (if you can call it that) is almost as slow is my 880DS from 3 years ago (over a second, too late for me). Not to mention that at least 1/3 of the pictures come out blurry when on the auto setting. Include the orange affect of the flash and I can't see possibly why you would keep this camera over cheaper options that perform the same. Or even better, get a Nikond3100 for 100 more or brand new d3200 for 300 more and have a real amazing but relatively cheap (SLR) camera.Good luck!
Скроменый эксперт
21.07.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Takes great pictures and is simple to use. Seems tough as we had it in some rainy conditions and it did not bother it at all.My wife used it mostly in europe and she got some great shots. And she is not good with camera's.The BUT is people are right about the battery, if you are not willing to buy a spare battery then passon this camera, would last less then 1/2 and would need a fresh battery. 1 spare was fine for us, the 2batteries would last a good 12-14 hours. 5 stars if longer battery lifeOverall great camera but short battery life. extra battery is cheap I paid like $15
Скроменый эксперт
27.04.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I won't try to add to the reviews here, except to say that this remains the King of Truly Pocketable Cameras.My wife loves the one I bought her, but it took a spill. This cracked the screen, though everything else is perfect. Frustrated by this, I began looking online.First, there are many videos that detail how to replace the screen on this series of camera. Here is one good example; though it's for the S95 I believe the disassembly sequence is the same: [...]Second, the part number for the S100 replacement screen is CM1-7245-000. Canon Parts can be reached at 800-258-0900 or 866-481-2569.The total cost for the screen, with tax and shipping, was under $40. For me, getting this directly from Canon was a far better deal than attempting to get the right thing from an eBay seller.I hope this helps anyone else who'd suffered the agony of Cracked Screen Syndrome!
Скроменый эксперт
05.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
take sharp pics always and it is very easy to carry fit right in my pocket. couldn't have been any better
Скроменый эксперт
19.04.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was informed my father had passed away. I asked if I could take pictures at the funeral and was told that would not be appropriate. At the time, all I had was my cellphone camera and wanted to remember something about the funeral. So when everyone left I took a few photos with my cell phone camera which didnt really do a great job. Another time, I went into a club and had my DSLR. I was told that I couldnt bring the DSLR in because it was "too professional". So I thought I needed a camera I could carry around secretly to remember the moments. This camera seems to fit the bill.It has an F 2.0 lens and Digic V so it is the most capable of all pocket cameras in low light. Is the picture quality as good as a full sized or APS-C DSLR? No it isnt as good, however, there are many places you just cant take that DSLR. This will provide the best pictures possible for a compact camera.
Скроменый эксперт
25.04.2012
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Bought this camera as an upgrade to a Canon 850IS. Main camera is 5d mkII. Found that S100 took very good movies. Took good low light pictures. Colors are good. In some ways camera is superior to 5d mkii, much lighter, it does do a good job overall as a point and shoot. Normal problems with little lens and clarity of pictures, poor detail etc. But the biggest problem is that it stopped working. On an extended trip overseas, the lens locked in an extended position and there is some kind of lens error. Bugger. Now using the old 850IS, but it is not as good as S100. Took the S100 to Hong Kong Canon repair center, and they said since camera had a US warranty, they couldn't honor the warranty, and it would take 5 days to fix it, if I wanted to pay for it.So, don't know what the deal is, but many copies seem to have this same problem. I would not buy it again.
Скроменый эксперт
11.04.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I wanted a camera that was more portable than my 7D for those times when the 7D plus lens and speed light take up to much space (e.g. in a restaurant). It was a great camera to take to the beach on a recent trip to Hawaii. This camera is not a 7D but comes acceptably close. I produces high quality RAW or JPG images in AV and Auto mode. It is compact and easy to carry. The recommended Case Logic case is a perfect fit for this camera and is padded to provide protection against damage to the camera. I take great HD video. The recommended 16 GB card is more room that I need for the way I use this camera. If this was going to be my main camera and get lots of use in one shooting, I would defiantly order a second battery. The only negative about this camera, which was mentioned in all the reviews that I read, was the placement of the pop up flash which is located where the left index finger would naturally go.
Скроменый эксперт
26.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The underwater casing for the camera works really well underwater! No leakage, and delivers really quickly! Worth my every penny!
Скроменый эксперт
20.08.2012
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Canon PowerShot S100 12.1 MP Digital Camera with 5x Wide-Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom (Black)I have both an s95 and a s100 (purchased when I got my first lens error on the s95 since repaired.) The lens error also shut down the s100 on summer holidays so I have gone back to the repaired s95 which has just encountered lens error again this morning. A brief trawl of other users reviews will show this to be a very common problem with the design of the camera.
Скроменый эксперт
14.12.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
My first S100 camera needed to be replaced because all of my photos were soft and needed sharpening. Plus auto focus was having a bit of a hard time focusing, I called canon and they wanted to repair it but I chose to replace it since I only had it two weeks. The photographs on my second camera are excellent even past 100% on Photoshop. I bought this for the RAW capabilities. RAW can only be used in 4:3 aspect ratio. I don't understand that limitation.My one suggestion is read the manual and play with the camera while doing so. While watching TV, with my laptop on which was needed to read the manual, I took a lot of of photos flash-less indoors. Even at a high ISO noise was limited.In the various modes I took photos with the DR on & off and at 200% & 400%, there is a big difference, turned on & off the shadow protection, ..et ... I wish the zoom was more then it is. I suppose they are saving that for the next update since the technology is available. The fact that this camera cost a small fortune & the 'big' manual is not included is annoying. The money lost in customers returning not only this but other cameras because they don't know how to use them most likely outweighs the cost of printing. Do you hear me Canon??? Not everyone owns a ipad, or a kindle, their too broke buying your cameras! ... :)
Скроменый эксперт
21.10.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
...the lens is defective. I just purchased it a few months ago then suddenly the lens got stuck . had to have it finished at the canon service center and it took over 2 months to have the lens replaced. terrible product..the s95 is so much better
Скроменый эксперт
02.12.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Just got the S100 and still playing with it. Picture quality and camera function seems fine to this point. However, you can not post process the pictures in Photoshop. I am using CS 5 and process most of my shots in camera raw. Adobe has not yet added the S100 to their camera file. You can not process raw or JPEG images in CS 5 at all. I assume that means you can't process in lower versions of Photoshop as well. Hopefully, Adobe will update the Camera Raw processor soon and include the S100. By the way, the Canon processing software included with the camera is LAME.Edit 12/21/11: As several comments point out, the recent release of Raw 6.6 now allows processing of raw files in CS 5. Turns out my inability to process Jpegs was due to my card reader. My older card reader would not read the new SD 8GB card. My SLR's use CF and this is my first SD card camera. An new card reader solved the problem. Been using the camera now for few weeks. Lots of functions, many of which I'll never use. Picture quality is very good (but not excellent). Color quality very good. Sharpness, good. Speed, very good. Low light very good. Noise, good to very good. Video, have not used much. I upgraded my rating from 3 to 4 stars. Still not sure the camera is worth the extra money. Compare to the S95 while it is still available before you buy.
Скроменый эксперт
06.01.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I bought this camera for a long cruise. The two features I wanted in addition to taking pictures, were the GPS and movies. There is good news and bad news.The good news:1. The movies are very good, given the problems holding a little camera still while taking a movie. Picture quality is excellent.2. The GPS works, but not usually indoors and some times takes a few minutes to sync. This may be a function of my position and the position of the GPS satellites. Even after it shows sync, it often does not have the altitude for a few more minutes.3. Picture quality is very good.The bad news:1. If you want the GPS to work with the pictures you are taking, you need to leave the camera on. Unfortunately, when you leave the camera on, one would think there would be a way to have the camera not keep running the rear display. I've set it for 10 seconds and indeed, it goes off, but it keeps coming back on and I don't push any of the buttons, but do have it hanging by the hand strap. This means the battery life is terrible. I had 5 batteries and often would be on the 4th one by the end of the day.2. It says it will take a 60 minute movie, but not with any known battery and I have not found a power cord for the camera.
Скроменый эксперт
09.04.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Excellent build quality. I like the ergonomics, which are great for one-handed use using the right hand.I love the detail captured on macro shots. I took a shot of a flower and can see all the little tiny specifics.I also purchased the Canon Powershot 300 HS at the same time, to see if this camera was worth 2.5x as much. The max video length on the 300HS is 10 min, the S100 max is 29'59". The audio in videos seems muffled in the 300 HS compared to the S100. The S100 audio seems to pick up much more detail. I do, however, prefer the reduced zoom speed of the 300 HS. The 300 HS seems fuzzy on details in shots, but the S100 has excellent details. The S100 is somewhat heavier and a little larger, but not by much. The S100 has tons of manual controls as well. The LCD screen is excellent, vivid.I'm keeping the S100 and sending back the 300 HS. The level of detail in the shots is night and day.
Скроменый эксперт
19.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Bought it to go into a "Fisheye" underwater housing. I have dived it several times and am happy with the results so far.
Скроменый эксперт
27.03.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Just bought this camera as a replacement for my last manual-featured point and shoot, a Nikon P7000, which itself was a sucessor to my Canon G10. Both of those cameras were fantastic, and despite being smaller than DSLRs, they were still sufficiently bulky to keep me from bringing them with me all the time, leading to more and more mobile phone photos. This is the first smaller point-and-shoot that actually offers the features and quality to make me walk away from those bulkier counterparts. In just a day of playing around with it, I've found the images to be super crisp and well-balanced, with perhaps a bit of usual Canon saturation. Outside of optical quality and speed, the killer feature for me is the GPS; I'm so sick of having to go into Picasa and manually geotag my photos, and with this camera I won't need to worry about that anymore. Feel-wise, it rests comfortably in the hand, and isn't so light as to feel like a toy.
Скроменый эксперт
23.12.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
So that you know where I am coming from, I am not an expert photographer, but a novice/intermediate. I do not own a DSLR because I do not want the weight and bulk. I carefully researched many point and shoot cameras before buying the S100.That said, I am extremely happy with this camera. It takes much better pictures than my Canon ELPH SD780. Better accuracy in focusing, better color, and sharper.I have taken over 100 photos in one week, and almost every single shot is usable. I have never experienced such consistent performance from a digital camera.Pros:* Great in low light, especially with the flash off. I got better results in general never using the flash.* Form factor makes it portable.* Manual control options. As others have noted, there are some limitations like flash control and exposure length for night shots.* 24 mm capability makes more a difference than I thought it would.Cons:* Battery life is short; 200 shots per full charge seems about right.* Placement of flash is inconvenient. However, you might not even need to use the flash very often.The S100 is not cheap, but I am willing to pay for such high performance in a small package. Overall, this is a wonderful camera, and I am happy with my choice.I bought this camera from Best Buy.
Скроменый эксперт
04.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Very decent quality and well made. Feels like leather and looks quite attractive. Looks and feels like its $40 case or more. Well done. Fits my S100 like a glove..
Скроменый эксперт
03.05.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I finally found a keeper S100 in "champagne silver" and love it. I tried at least 3 (three) S100's and the annoying clicking sound in the video was driving me crazy. I called Canon tech support who said they were unaware of any video clicking issues (NOT)!! They had me turn off the IS as well as other things and the clicking was still there. They simply said "well it's a small camera so that's to be expected). My Elph 300HS and SX230 are small, too but there's no clicking sound during the video playback.It's really worth your while if you have to try a few to find one you like. I am still a Canon fan when it comes to point and shoot digital cameras....now if I could only find an SX260 without that annoying squeal, then I'll be even more happy!!Good luck out there Canon fans!!
Показаны отзывы 649-672 из 921.
